On November 16 2013 11:59 Risen wrote: Storr won't vote for you b/c he's afraid you're going to lynch him.
not really that more so his lack of conviction on any single one person i feel
Yeah that's part of my strategy. You'll note if you look in my filter that it's quite intentional.
any update since then? why not post something else with more conviction?
@BC i put my input in, so get off my dick. you want to make a read on me, make a read off my reads or w/e. I just had my brithday, and im going camping this weekend. Sorry that i can't invest as much time as i would like. and if your gonna keep bashing me for that all i can respond is go actually scum hunt and stop bitching.
Yeah I'm looking into Pandain right now - some of his interactions, a couple probeyprobes you know. I got a couple of irons in the fire guy I'll let you know if anything pans out.
On November 16 2013 11:51 Alakaslam wrote: I haven't had any serious reservations toward BloodyC0bbler yet. But I have had reservations, because I am still having reservations about every vet because of Piperism.
Dude that's just not how the game is played. Experienced players don't just magically get followers...not since Palmar was crowned King of the Noobs has a player been just innately able to garner blind followers, and Palmar hasn't played a serious game of mafia in like years it feels like.
I don't believe you.
Well when you reach the promised land and find the holy grail you just let me know so I can come have a sip m'kaay?
My alternative is Blazinghand. He has not given me sufficient reason to vote him however.
BloodlyC0bbler is someone I have zero meta on, as is SuperSoft, who I would otherwise be voting now. He cannot get my vote due to my reservations. However, he will have this semi-endorsement.
On November 16 2013 12:19 Alakaslam wrote: My alternative is Blazinghand. He has not given me sufficient reason to vote him however.
BloodlyC0bbler is someone I have zero meta on, as is SuperSoft, who I would otherwise be voting now. They cannot get my vote due to my reservations. However, he will have this semi-endorsement.
On November 16 2013 12:19 Alakaslam wrote: My alternative is Blazinghand. He has not given me sufficient reason to vote him however.
BloodlyC0bbler is someone I have zero meta on, as is SuperSoft, who I would otherwise be voting now. He cannot get my vote due to my reservations. However, he will have this semi-endorsement.
Even if BH HAD given you reason to vote him, by your own logic you couldn't because of reservations about Piperism (which, by the way, is laughable coming from you SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE of your BH fervor.)
Just vote for me Alak, I promise I won't lynch you. Pinky swear.
supersoft who do you think is scum/plan to lynch if you become mayor? I mainly just see you declaring how obvious it is you are town repeatedly without actually strongly accusing/building a real case against anyone.
On November 16 2013 12:26 Risen wrote: Changed my mind. Of the two I now think yamato is scum. Rayn now more towny, HF more scummy
Still don't wanna qualify your either/or read on me and yamato?
Not much to qualify. Didn't like the interaction between you two. Made my gut feel like one of you were scum. I think it's yamato. I'm voting you now because I like your recent posting more than BC, even though I still think BC's posting is fine.
On November 16 2013 12:04 austinmcc wrote: Risen, why do you like BC's post so much? Also, do you feel like he's "stuck around" and continued?
I felt it was the kind of post someone should be making in the game. Instantly made me like him. Haven't liked his followup as much. Prefer VE.
I like the first bit of this and agree. I just didn't and don't find it alignment-indicative, because I think people of either alignment could feel that such a post would get some love, and could put one together. Especially someone who didn't really have anything else going, that sort of person could make that post and sort of bask in it, because now they're the dude who made that post.
On November 16 2013 12:28 Mig wrote: BC why did you vote super as mayor and why not run for mayor yourself?
because I believe that ve/ss/myself should be elected. I also like the idea of voting for someone else to get in if i can. One doesnt need to vote for themself
On November 16 2013 12:04 austinmcc wrote: Risen, why do you like BC's post so much? Also, do you feel like he's "stuck around" and continued?
I felt it was the kind of post someone should be making in the game. Instantly made me like him. Haven't liked his followup as much. Prefer VE.
I like the first bit of this and agree. I just didn't and don't find it alignment-indicative, because I think people of either alignment could feel that such a post would get some love, and could put one together. Especially someone who didn't really have anything else going, that sort of person could make that post and sort of bask in it, because now they're the dude who made that post.
If that makes sense.
Makes sense, and I don't think it's TOO alignment indicative, but when you're posting well and generating good discussion I'm going to support you. Not because I think you're town, but because I think you're pro-town.
If you know you are town and you believe you should be elected why wouldn't you push for yourself? You have made no case for why you should be elected at all.
Can you explain exactly why ss is a good candidate to be elected?
EPT
