EPTWitchcraft Mini Mafia II - Page 28
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
| ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
Fuck now I do want to change it. I don't know if I've ever really seen scum martyr (self-vote, whatever) like that specifically and he gave us pre-death reads. Rayn he quoted you here---does that thought stand? Is his play too shit to be scum? ##Unvote ET I await your return because I want to see if you can convince me now that I don't have a primary target. I still don't think I'd go Sn0 today (though if he acts the same way tomorrow as he does today he's dead tomorrow) and I feel better about Umasi than I did so maybe it is thrawn. The thought process thing has yet to steer me wrong though, and I would find it odd that thrawn would be so happy-go-lucky about talking about town circles and whatnot... | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
I have no idea what to think about it either. Could you comment on what i said about gumshoe? | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On November 05 2013 17:14 raynpelikoneet wrote: Generally yes, it stands. Although now it doesn't because he brought it up. :E I have no idea what to think about it either. Could you comment on what i said about gumshoe? I see your point but the effort he put in while he WAS here (sporadically) gives me a great deal of pause. Why would he do that as scum? What is the motivation? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
I think it's not alignment indicative. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
EchelonTee is there anything you want to talk about | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
On November 05 2013 17:30 thrawn2112 wrote: onegu is town methinks EchelonTee is there anything you want to talk about respond to my case. since you yourself stated that you prefer to be the center of attention. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 05 2013 17:37 EchelonTee wrote: I don't think he is scummier than the people I am talking about. A while ago i commented on your case and asked you to do something. Any reason why you are refusing to answer me? | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On November 05 2013 17:32 EchelonTee wrote: respond to my case. since you yourself stated that you prefer to be the center of attention. The list: I was not making a list of who isn't lurking with the promise to attack lurkers. I wasn't even making a list of anti-lurkers. I was making a list of anyone who (including lurkers, obviously) wasn't committing to conversation. So the people not on the list includes both lurkers and people like yourself, who at the time I didn't feel like they'd done anything meaningful. The list even included some people who were borderline lurking but at least had made some type of impression on me. The only purpose of such a list is to hopefully intimidate people not on the list to dip their toes farther into the water. Rayn vote: If you've really gone through my town games like you appear to then you should see my rayn vote is very much like something I'd do. And you're wrong, I do give my reasoning and I do not regret having my vote on rayn. I think if you read all of my posts about rayn then you can see a clear progression of my read. Everything else: Sorry I just don't take the game seriously 100% of the time, especially when I'm bored. LOL btw I looked at one of my cases you linked as evidence of how I can write a serious case, and one of my points against prom was that he wasn't being my friend. That whole post was kinda trollish, I'm kinda wondering why you used that as an example because there are probably a lot better ones to pick from. With you claiming to have done meta research on me yet you can't see my rayn vote coming from a town thrawn makes me think you went looking into my meta already knowing the outcome of your results. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
On November 05 2013 16:14 raynpelikoneet wrote: ET i don't think those posts you quoted from thrawn make him scummy. There is noone in this game who has contributed to the game in every post of theirs and his vote on me was perfectly reasonable given our interactions in Desert. If you accuse thrawn of being scum because of that i must say you come off as at least as scummy as him ebcause (1) he actually explained his vote and (2) you could have seen that the vote was totally legit at that time for what i said if you looked at his reasoning. The last quote is actually the only thing that i agree is scummy and in addition to that there are more of those in thrawn's filter. But, why are you picking some random quotes from thrawn's filter and make it look like he has not contributed much? Can you do a compilation of thrawn's & gumshoe's contributions to the game and show me thrawn has contributed more than gumshoe has, because afaik that's what you are accusing thrawn of? You don't need to contribute in every post, obviously. The distinction I made is that thrawn said he would do things, then did not follow up. His vote on you was somewhat reasonable, but it seemed like merely a pressure vote and not an attempt to pursue scum. That is fine at some stages of the game but I still have no idea who Thrawn thinks is scum. Deadline is in 12 hrs. I don't know why you are saying I look as scummy as him, because I have stated my thoughts on several people and outlined reasoning as clear as I can make it. I don't think I was picking random quotes from thrawn's filter. I think that I picked specific quotes that I felt showcased how he is not contributing. Posts like these show effort and contribution to me, even if I don't really agree with the content. The second post in particular is one that I don't see a scum gumshoe doing. Thrawn has not contributed as much as these posts of gumshoe's. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On November 05 2013 17:48 EchelonTee wrote: but I still have no idea who Thrawn thinks is scum. yeah me too | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
On November 05 2013 17:47 thrawn2112 wrote: The list: I was not making a list of who isn't lurking with the promise to attack lurkers. I wasn't even making a list of anti-lurkers. I was making a list of anyone who (including lurkers, obviously) wasn't committing to conversation. So the people not on the list includes both lurkers and people like yourself, who at the time I didn't feel like they'd done anything meaningful. The list even included some people who were borderline lurking but at least had made some type of impression on me. The only purpose of such a list is to hopefully intimidate people not on the list to dip their toes farther into the water. Rayn vote: If you've really gone through my town games like you appear to then you should see my rayn vote is very much like something I'd do. And you're wrong, I do give my reasoning and I do not regret having my vote on rayn. I think if you read all of my posts about rayn then you can see a clear progression of my read. Everything else: Sorry I just don't take the game seriously 100% of the time, especially when I'm bored. LOL btw I looked at one of my cases you linked as evidence of how I can write a serious case, and one of my points against prom was that he wasn't being my friend. That whole post was kinda trollish, I'm kinda wondering why you used that as an example because there are probably a lot better ones to pick from. With you claiming to have done meta research on me yet you can't see my rayn vote coming from a town thrawn makes me think you went looking into my meta already knowing the outcome of your results. You said you would focus on them, but I don't see any focus on you. I did not do intensive meta research. I skimmed your posts, but did not skim rayn's posts. If I missed some huge, obvious interaction that shows that you must be town and rayn believes so, I could back off for now. There might've been better examples but I'm not going to spend hours poring over your meta. I picked the first example I saw that looked like a real case. I don't see you making any real cases and your excuse is that you're bored. I don't know the point of trying harder if it's clear that you don't really care and are too bored to play. If you think I am scum, please state so instead of lightly insinuating it. I'd like to know who you want to lynch, if you're not too bored to say something of use. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
| ||
| ||
