|
Message GMarshal if you request a ban please ^_^
Also when the game you're sitting out is over!
~GMarshal |
Oh no. It was this thread:
On January 15 2014 11:14 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On January 15 2014 10:45 marvellosity wrote:
I think geript is into S&M, he's obsessed with punishments It's about creating a fair system. You can't just pick and choose "Oh this guy is a good guy who's well meaning so he doesn't get a punishment. But that guy, that guy is 'toxic' so lets fuck him as hard as we can." All that breeds is you vets creating and continuing the circle jerk that exists right now. It's blatantly obvious. Completely disrespecting a host by flat out ignoring and going against 3 warning in game if a non-vet like Cephiro or Rean would be a modkill and a ban, quite possibly a multi-game ban, after the second warning. But "BH" is a 'good guy;' he builds the community so he doesn't even get a warning for actively taking part in ruining a game. To say otherwise is complete bullshit. For someone as smart as you are Marv, it's almost comical how you can't even see that.
Dat geript.
|
Like... There is no rule that OO broke that Keisler didn't break in 48h except the selfvoting rule.
And OO his rulebreaking is very subjective. While Keisler his isn't.
|
I didn't read the game but if Hopeless is mad at somebody for trowing the game for mafia who made 10 posts D1, got lynched. But he is not mad at the guy who made 0 posts and got modkilled and ended the game for mafia, strange things must be happening.
|
On October 18 2014 03:24 Koshi wrote:
I didn't read the game but if Hopeless is mad at somebody who made 10 posts and made him lose but he is not mad at the guy who made 0 posts and got modkilled, strange things must be happening.
i'm mad because the 10post guy had a greater impact on my loss than the guy who got modkilled at a point where the game was more-or-less unwinnable, in large part due to the 10post guy. They both deserve some kind of punishment and I personally believe that OO was the worse offender.
|
On September 30 2014 07:32 Koshi wrote:
Hosts forgetting to do nightactions.
Hosts giving away scumteams.
Hosts making mistakes sending the roles.
Hosts quickening deadlines 15 minutes, 30 minutes before deadline. This one is pretty specific but happened 3 times already give or take some minutes.
Hosts inventing retarded game set ups.
Hosts making imbalanced set-ups. aka +75% for a team to win from the start. rng on roles somewhat counted in.
Hosts not enforcing their own rules.
Start temp banning these people.
And put people on balance that actually care and have a brain.
If you want an example for a game I can give you one for any example. I can also do combined ones.
Hosts lieing about postcounts to get their biased views passed and innocent players banned.
|
On October 18 2014 03:26 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2014 03:24 Koshi wrote:
I didn't read the game but if Hopeless is mad at somebody who made 10 posts and made him lose but he is not mad at the guy who made 0 posts and got modkilled, strange things must be happening. i'm mad because the 10post guy had a greater impact on my loss than the guy who got modkilled at a point where the game was more-or-less unwinnable, in large part due to the 10post guy. They both deserve some kind of punishment and I personally believe that OO was the worse offender.
Yes. I agree that making 10 posts while getting lynched is way worse than making 0 posts and getting modkilled.
Good stuff.
|
On October 18 2014 03:18 Koshi wrote:
Wasn't geript one of these people going nuts in the previous banthread that some people were not equally treated? Hmm. Or was that only rayn.
Guess who the new nutjob is.
|
|
|
United States22154 Posts
I'm not ever sure what's being argued, but if we could keep the personal attacks and mocking to a minimum and discuss whatever coherently like adults, that would make me happy.
Thanks.
|
Sorry GM, I'll stop. This game is resolved,
|
On October 18 2014 03:19 Koshi wrote:Oh no. It was this thread: Show nested quote +On January 15 2014 11:14 geript wrote:On January 15 2014 10:45 marvellosity wrote:
I think geript is into S&M, he's obsessed with punishments It's about creating a fair system. You can't just pick and choose "Oh this guy is a good guy who's well meaning so he doesn't get a punishment. But that guy, that guy is 'toxic' so lets fuck him as hard as we can." All that breeds is you vets creating and continuing the circle jerk that exists right now. It's blatantly obvious. Completely disrespecting a host by flat out ignoring and going against 3 warning in game if a non-vet like Cephiro or Rean would be a modkill and a ban, quite possibly a multi-game ban, after the second warning. But "BH" is a 'good guy;' he builds the community so he doesn't even get a warning for actively taking part in ruining a game. To say otherwise is complete bullshit. For someone as smart as you are Marv, it's almost comical how you can't even see that. Dat geript.
get ripped
|
Koshi I thought you quit tl mafia forever and ever?
|
On October 18 2014 03:53 WaveofShadow wrote:
Koshi I thought you quit tl mafia forever and ever?
you can play mafia games anywhere
but when it comes to sweet sweet mafia butt hurt accept no substitutes.
|
On October 18 2014 03:24 Koshi wrote:
I didn't read the game but if Hopeless is mad at somebody for trowing the game for mafia who made 10 posts D1, got lynched. But he is not mad at the guy who made 0 posts and got modkilled and ended the game for mafia, strange things must be happening.
Maybe you should read the game then. In the least read both of the filters of the players in question. There is a clear effort made by KelsierSC where there is not by ObviousOne. My standard is not "did you post/vote." My standard is "are you trying." I think everyone in that game, cohosts included, that OO didn't and KelsierSC did. Additionally, considering that KelsierSC seemed to put forth more effort the worse his position got and was in ok-ish position at mylo (when he was modkilled) and that his last post (very early in D4) noted exhaustion from work, it seems more likely that his afk was due to "life issues" rather than anything else.
|
On October 18 2014 03:32 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2014 07:32 Koshi wrote:
Hosts forgetting to do nightactions.
Hosts giving away scumteams.
Hosts making mistakes sending the roles.
Hosts quickening deadlines 15 minutes, 30 minutes before deadline. This one is pretty specific but happened 3 times already give or take some minutes.
Hosts inventing retarded game set ups.
Hosts making imbalanced set-ups. aka +75% for a team to win from the start. rng on roles somewhat counted in.
Hosts not enforcing their own rules.
Start temp banning these people.
And put people on balance that actually care and have a brain.
If you want an example for a game I can give you one for any example. I can also do combined ones. Hosts lieing about postcounts to get their biased views passed and innocent players banned.
This guy is blatantly pushing a scum agenda. Lynch with fire.
|
On October 18 2014 03:53 WaveofShadow wrote:
Koshi I thought you quit tl mafia forever and ever?
Quitting the ban-list isn't as easy.
|
On October 18 2014 07:06 Hapahauli wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2014 03:53 WaveofShadow wrote:
Koshi I thought you quit tl mafia forever and ever? Quitting the ban-list isn't as easy.
I wish I could quit you.
|
Say there is a dog on the side of the road, Obvious One stumbles across the dog and says," welp dog is dead, BYE!" and does absolutely nothing to save the dog.
Then Kelsier comes across the same dog and does as much as he can to save him, he mends his broken limbs, cares for him for months and finally the dog is recovering. Then Kelsier brings out his gun and shoots the dog in the face.
When Kelsier is questioned about why he shot the dog in the face, the whole community becomes outraged, "he is the only reason the dog is alive in the first place" they cry. "it is up to him if he want's to shoot the dog" "look at this bastard Obvious One, he didn't even TRY to help the dog in the first place'
The next day Kelsier is arrested on animal cruelty charges, and Obvious One isn't. Why? because despite how much he cared for the dog and nursed it back to health, shooting a dog in the face is illegal, but leaving it on the side of the road is not.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Well said :D
With one omission...
+ Show Spoiler +The next day, Oats comes across the dog and eats it for dinner.
|
On October 18 2014 09:17 DarthPunk wrote:
Say there is a dog on the side of the road, Obvious One stumbles across the dog and says," welp dog is dead, BYE!" and does absolutely nothing to save the dog.
Then Kelsier comes across the same dog and does as much as he can to save him, he mends his broken limbs, cares for him for months and finally the dog is recovering. Then Kelsier brings out his gun and shoots the dog in the face.
When Kelsier is questioned about why he shot the dog in the face, the whole community becomes outraged, "he is the only reason the dog is alive in the first place" they cry. "it is up to him if he want's to shoot the dog" "look at this bastard Obvious One, he didn't even TRY to help the dog in the first place'
The next day Kelsier is arrested on animal cruelty charges, and Obvious One isn't. Why? because despite how much he cared for the dog and nursed it back to health, shooting a dog in the face is illegal, but leaving it on the side of the road is not.
I was actually expecting a genocide analogy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://skimhenson.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/603011_580651281961617_779003640_n.jpg)
