| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Message GMarshal if you request a ban please ^_^ Also when the game you're sitting out is over! ~GMarshal | ||
|
Vivax
22284 Posts
But you gotta understand that kush comes from a time with other standards, like me, we grew the thick skin you needed not to tilt at 100000 insults, and now it looks like you get banned for something that isn't even an insult. If at least you had to make a point, you made it now, but give your pretty extreme stance switch in modding some time to ripe for players who come from a rougher environment. | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9856 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On February 25 2014 04:55 Grackaroni wrote: I don't think anyone aside from Blazinghand really found Kush's in-game language offensive? It's always up to the hosts but I think the moderation in this case was rather extreme. That's the exact point though. moderation (in BH's opinion at least) needs to be stricter and so BH is being stricter about it in his games. | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
On February 25 2014 05:00 Hopeless1der wrote: That's the exact point though. moderation (in BH's opinion at least) needs to be stricter and so BH is being stricter about it in his games. My personal, fairly unimportant opinion on this would be that BH is free to do so in his games, but unless the OP specifically states that he expects markedly different and clean language from all players (which I checked and it didn't), he shouldn't be pursuing supplemental punishment for cases like this that other hosts wouldn't necessarily be taking in-game action on. In-game modkill is understandable and ENTIRELY his prerogative. Out-of-game punishment (aka here) probably needs a more blatant disregard for rules presented in the OP or a more blatant and intentional disregard for in-game warnings. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18258 Posts
On February 25 2014 05:15 Sn0_Man wrote: My personal, fairly unimportant opinion on this would be that BH is free to do so in his games, but unless the OP specifically states that he expects markedly different and clean language from all players (which I checked and it didn't), he shouldn't be pursuing supplemental punishment for cases like this that other hosts wouldn't necessarily be taking in-game action on. In-game modkill is understandable and ENTIRELY his prerogative. Out-of-game punishment (aka here) probably needs a more blatant disregard for rules presented in the OP or a more blatant and intentional disregard for in-game warnings. He gave an explicit warning, didn't he? He warned about language and then modkilled for it? | ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
On February 25 2014 05:15 Sn0_Man wrote: My personal, fairly unimportant opinion on this would be that BH is free to do so in his games, but unless the OP specifically states that he expects markedly different and clean language from all players (which I checked and it didn't), he shouldn't be pursuing supplemental punishment for cases like this that other hosts wouldn't necessarily be taking in-game action on. In-game modkill is understandable and ENTIRELY his prerogative. Out-of-game punishment (aka here) probably needs a more blatant disregard for rules presented in the OP or a more blatant and intentional disregard for in-game warnings. Does this not cover it? It's from BH's OP: Inappropriate posts: If you want to post something insulting or inappropriate and know the TL mods would have a problem with it elsewhere, don't post it here. If you do, a host will warn you or modkill you and request that you be banned from future games. The hosts have the final say on what is inappropriate. If you do not like how someone is talking to you, please PM a host, Flamewheel, or Mig before involving the TL staff. If you are unsatisfied with how the situation is resolved, then you can appeal to the TL staff normally. As a general guideline: Stuff like "this argument is dumb because XYZ" is fine. Stuff like "you are doing ABC, which is dumb" or "you're dumb because you do ABC, and ABC is dumb" is fine. Stuff like "you're dumb. lolooloooo" is not fine. Insults and abrasive play happen, but it must all be oriented towards trying to win the game. Don't be that guy. The main thing is: don't insult for the purpose of insulting only. I'm very verbal about people getting out of line, so if you cross the line I will let you know. I am not afraid to ruin a game of mafia for 10 people and 4 hosts just to modkill someone. ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ﾉ PUT YOUR FAITH IN THE LIGHT ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ﾉ | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
| ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
If I get modkilled for inactivity because I gave up on a game, I deserve a ban. If I get modkilled for inactivity after requesting a replacement and providing a perfectly good reason for being unable to play, I don't deserve a ban IMO despite both resulting in a modkill and there being no difference to how badly I'm ruining the game. However, I'm really really honestly not going to argue this because it isn't too important to me. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18258 Posts
On February 25 2014 05:59 kushm4sta wrote: i didn't disregard any warnings. i didn't realize "gayfk"would be violation of that warning. That's a fair point. We should just ban you for using "gayfk" in the first place, though! :D | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On February 25 2014 05:59 kushm4sta wrote: i didn't disregard any warnings. i didn't realize "gayfk"would be violation of that warning. That was towards me right? I don't take offense from things like that based purely on myself being a badmouth. Also "gayfk" is pretty rofl and i don't think why that would be offending anyone.  | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
 | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On February 25 2014 06:25 raynpelikoneet wrote: That was towards me right? I don't take offense from things like that based purely on myself being a badmouth. Also "gayfk" is pretty rofl and i don't think why that would be offending anyone. Thats only acceptable cos you kept hitting on me in IRC ! | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
KUSH the easiest way for you to dismiss these charges would be to provide photographic evidence that you are in fact gay and post it in the ban list. perhaps find a guy and ask to suck his dick ( i mean it cant be that hard to find a dick to suck right?? Who doesnt like to get their dick sucked??) and take a picture. that will show them banlist conspirators they are out of line and clear your name. | ||
|
ghost_403
United States1825 Posts
On February 25 2014 10:02 Coagulation wrote: according to general social etiquette kushs guilt or innocence hinges on the identity of his sexual orientation. If kush is gay it is considered socially acceptable for him to use the term "gayfk" without offending anyone. KUSH the easiest way for you to dismiss these charges would be to provide photographic evidence that you are in fact gay and post it in the ban list. perhaps find a guy and ask to suck his dick ( i mean it cant be that hard to find a dick to suck right?? Who doesnt like to get their dick sucked??) and take a picture. that will show them banlist conspirators they are out of line and clear your name. The flaw with your plan is if he says "no homo" before hand, then it's not gay. Since we'll have no proof this did not happen, I submit that we cannot accept it as evidence. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games |
|
CranKy Ducklings
WardiTV Team League
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
IPSL
Hawk vs TBD
StRyKeR vs TBD
BSL
n0maD vs perroflaco
TerrOr vs ZZZero
MadiNho vs WolFix
DragOn vs LancerX
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Team League
OSC
BSL
Sterling vs Azhi_Dahaki
Napoleon vs Mazur
Jimin vs Nesh
spx vs Strudel
IPSL
Artosis vs TBD
Napoleon vs TBD
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
