• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 22:41
CEST 04:41
KST 11:41
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy4Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27
Community News
Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer2Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson."2Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey.8Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)14BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2
StarCraft 2
General
Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing How herO can make history in the Code S S2 finals Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey. Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025 Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recent recommended BW games FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 34500 users

GoT Mafia: Lords and Liars

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Normal
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
July 28 2013 16:13 GMT
#20
/in!
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
July 31 2013 08:44 GMT
#84
Monday would be nice and I'm fine about more slots either way <3
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 05 2013 17:19 GMT
#159
Wait I thought this was supposed to start later today? What's going on? :p
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 05 2013 17:38 GMT
#163
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 05 2013 20:33 GMT
#178
Quick someone answer and become host so we can start
REVOLUTION
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 06 2013 08:40 GMT
#243
On August 06 2013 17:28 Xatalos wrote:
OMG Spoilerzzz!!!

Anyways, good to see the game starting soonish (though I still miss the answers to my earlier setup questions :/ ). The deadline is in a bit awkward spot for me, about when I usually wake up (I think), but it's not too bad I guess... At least unless I have a busy morning


Either I cannot into counting or you don't live in Finland but I think it's 6 pm for you.
I guess the other possibility is you wake up at 6 pm!
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-06 09:01:47
August 06 2013 09:01 GMT
#246
But I'm 7 hours behind the forumtime so I did +7 and then +2 (+26)

IM SO CONFUSEDDD

But yeah it's in our morning then xatalos, mah bad
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 06 2013 15:10 GMT
#258
On August 07 2013 00:01 s0Lstice wrote:
im in the nightswatch i can talk its cool


Can't do much of anything else though
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 06 2013 16:51 GMT
#262
Cool beans. The deadline is at 7 am for me so I won't often be around for it, but I will try.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 06 2013 17:10 GMT
#264
On August 07 2013 02:05 s0Lstice wrote:
I just called my banners and got voicemail : /


You have to ask yourself. Did you get voicemail immediately, after two rings, or after four?
Because if it's after two rings, I am truly sorry.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-06 21:49:47
August 06 2013 21:49 GMT
#270
gumshoe the game hasn't started yet.
You can edit.
I'd also prefer trivia questions and answers in spoilers since I haven't read a dance with dragons yet

edit: see?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 08:44 GMT
#515
On August 08 2013 15:08 Oatsmaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 08 2013 15:05 yamato77 wrote:
On August 08 2013 15:04 Oatsmaster wrote:
exactly, it doesnt help you.

Me knowing your reads on players in your own house who you have PM contact with doesn't help me?

Think for a second, Oats, this isn't difficult.

you knowing my town reads on people doesnt help you.
fuck you too yamato.


Why do you instantly reply with "townreads" as opposed to "scumreads". Are you saying you have no scumreads in your house?

Anyway, yes giving out house lists is silly. We don't know how many scum there are so some houses could be 100% town, if there are two houses 100% town why give scum information that town cannot benefit from?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 09:23 GMT
#525
On August 08 2013 18:18 Onegu wrote:
If I wanted a house list it would be Baratheon.


House lords can talk to eachother, if it is as you say (5 vets one non vet) surely the vets will figure him out?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 10:59 GMT
#542
On August 08 2013 19:54 Koshi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 08 2013 19:47 Oatsmaster wrote:
Oats, we just played in Titanic and you come in this thread and say that you know that everybody in your house is town and that you will protect their identity? You must be really REALLY confident in this game.
You prevent us to find scum in your house and you prevent your house by talking about how you got elected or prevent them from giving away information about you.

Um what? My reads were mostly right in Titanic. 1 wrong read. whatever.

I only prevent you from knowing who I can contact through pms.
All this other stuff is really weird. I didnt get elected.

I meant how the person in your house got elected.
Your first scumread in Titanic was on a town that you pushed till the end.
Then you found a "townslip" on an actual scum that we suspected and managed to get that scum enough towncred so he didn't get lynched day 1.

Now in this game you say that your entire house is town and that we should just trust you on it.

That's hilarious.


I think sharing townreads is kinda useless. It makes it easier for scum to choose a nk and giving townreads is easy for scum.
Treat it like a regular game with pms, scumhunt in the thread, scumhunt in pms or share reads with people you're fairly sure are town, only bring up pms in the thread if you got a really strong scumread on someone because of it.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 11:20 GMT
#547
Players are players. Don't need to know which house they're from to scumhunt them. We're also like 6 hours into the game.
But yes we should stop talking about house lists it's silly. I'm not too bothered but I see no reason to share them at this time.
After some flips and lord votes it'll probably be helpful.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 12:45 GMT
#569
Dandel you can come join my house, np.

Koshi played pretty weirdly as town in Titanic so I wouldn't quite say he claimed scum. That said, he did say he was trolling to see how far he could take it without taking heat (and he was town, sigh.

On August 08 2013 19:09 Xatalos wrote:
Heh, you don't need to convince me about that. I've already stated that I see no use in hiding House member lists. It just slows down scumhunting without likely any gain IMO.


I hate to come back to this subject, but Xatalos could you explain how hiding house member lists slows scumhunting?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 12:50 GMT
#573
On August 08 2013 21:46 Dandel Ion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 08 2013 21:45 Clarity_nl wrote:
Dandel you can come join my house, np.

Koshi played pretty weirdly as town in Titanic so I wouldn't quite say he claimed scum. That said, he did say he was trolling to see how far he could take it without taking heat (and he was town, sigh.

On August 08 2013 19:09 Xatalos wrote:
Heh, you don't need to convince me about that. I've already stated that I see no use in hiding House member lists. It just slows down scumhunting without likely any gain IMO.


I hate to come back to this subject, but Xatalos could you explain how hiding house member lists slows scumhunting?

He was openly going for a no-lord voting.

He's not town.
I've seen retarded town. I've seen trolls. This is not it.


So you wanna lynch him today then?
I might be willing to go with this unless someone else in the house can contradict this.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 13:49 GMT
#628
No you can't post your pms, you just tell your version of the story. So far Dandel seems concise while you seem all over the place.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 13:55 GMT
#637
On August 08 2013 22:54 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 08 2013 22:49 Acrofales wrote:
On August 08 2013 22:47 Xatalos wrote:
On August 08 2013 22:43 Acrofales wrote:
On August 08 2013 22:38 Xatalos wrote:
On August 08 2013 22:24 Oberyn wrote:
With only 25% of the players controlling a vote or kp, we need to find a way to make the non-Lords accountable for their actions. I suggest that each player pm their Lord their preferred lynch target and their preferred kp target. These should then be posted in the thread either at the end of day one or the beginning of day two so we have a better idea where everyone stands. Something we have to watch out for is a mafia bus where a non-Lord pushes a scum buddy without consequence because they have no vote. We have to keep in mind the difference in ones play as a Lord and non-Lord.


That's a major problem. Scum would have zero difficulty faking their "votes" since they didn't matter at all.

I don't know why Oberyn suggests it should be behind closed doors in any case. As I stated to my house members, I will be pressuring people to give their opinions, and why, regardless of whether they are a lord or not. It is far more dangerous that filthy Blackfyres just lurk in the background while upstanding members of the realm murder each other based on false accusations, than that scum "bus" each other when they have no power. In the latter they are at least talking and influencing and involved in the decision process. In the former, the Blackfyres win without sticking out their hands. Lurkers are even more of a problem than usual and I will be keeping an eye on them.


Lurkers should also remember that there's a LOT of KP in the hands of the Lords and they will most likely be used against lurkers.

I, as a lord, don't even know how much KP is in my hands. I have prayed to the gods for more information. Not quite sure how you know it's a LOT.


According to the rules it's 1 KP per Lord per Day. 1 x 7 = 7 KP = a lot.


This game has a health sytem
Also
Each house has an X kp shot every night cycle (combined, so shot every 72 hours) which is used by whoever is currently lord. They must pm the mods to send in the house kp and the action will go through as soon as a mod sees the pm.


How did you derive X?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 16:15 GMT
#727
On August 09 2013 01:13 Onegu wrote:
So im not following the clarity_nl thing because of all the redacted. Someone gave thier role name out, then someone passed that along, but the first person didnt pass it along? Then the third person passed it on to the last person with a analysis?


snb gave me his rolename and told me not to tell anyone. I told someone and asked them what they thought.
snb asked me why and I said to see what he thought, later on he asked me why again and I said to see his reaction.
Not exactly contradictory..
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 16:22 GMT
#730
Because I couldn't figure out what my "lie" was
Could you point out the scum motivation snb?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 16:23 GMT
#732
On August 09 2013 01:22 Chromatically wrote:
What sort of reaction were you hoping for, clarity?


If he were town he would be genuinely upset that his plan got ruined (he was, and early plans are crap anyway)
If he were scum he would go "dang, you ruined my plan, oh well"

Something along those lines. He did the former, obviously.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 16:29 GMT
#736
On August 09 2013 01:27 Chromatically wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 01:23 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 01:22 Chromatically wrote:
What sort of reaction were you hoping for, clarity?


If he were town he would be genuinely upset that his plan got ruined (he was, and early plans are crap anyway)
If he were scum he would go "dang, you ruined my plan, oh well"

Something along those lines. He did the former, obviously.

Why wouldn't scum act upset and try to get you lynched for this?


If it happened in thread they might. But I think that the people pushing others n0 are likely town so far.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 16:34 GMT
#741
On August 09 2013 01:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 01:23 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 01:22 Chromatically wrote:
What sort of reaction were you hoping for, clarity?


If he were town he would be genuinely upset that his plan got ruined (he was, and early plans are crap anyway)
If he were scum he would go "dang, you ruined my plan, oh well"

Something along those lines. He did the former, obviously.

What was the point of intentionally ignore SnB questioning you about your lie, multiple times as he said?
What kind of reaction you were hoping for? And how did REDACTED act? Does he come townie to you or what?


I think he's town, yes. Although not for his reaction to what I said.
Thought he was scum for a little bit but that changed. Also not because of his reaction.

So yeah that part was kinda fruitless. Got a real strong townread on snb though.

On August 09 2013 01:23 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 01:22 Chromatically wrote:
What sort of reaction were you hoping for, clarity?


If he were town he would be genuinely upset that his plan got ruined (he was, and early plans are crap anyway)
If he were scum he would go "dang, you ruined my plan, oh well"

Something along those lines. He did the former, obviously.


It's not much of a plan if I just tell him straight away "oh I'm fishing for a reaction from you"
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 16:34 GMT
#742
quoted the wrong post, my bad.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 16:40 GMT
#745
On August 09 2013 01:36 Chromatically wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 01:29 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 01:27 Chromatically wrote:
On August 09 2013 01:23 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 01:22 Chromatically wrote:
What sort of reaction were you hoping for, clarity?


If he were town he would be genuinely upset that his plan got ruined (he was, and early plans are crap anyway)
If he were scum he would go "dang, you ruined my plan, oh well"

Something along those lines. He did the former, obviously.

Why wouldn't scum act upset and try to get you lynched for this?


If it happened in thread they might. But I think that the people pushing others n0 are likely town so far.

^ Isn't this what SnB did? Out you in thread and push you for it?


No I mean, if I ruined someones plan in thread they might, if they're scum.
But since it's in pms during n0 I find it impossible to come from scum that he became suspicious of me in pms.

I think whatever "experiment" he would have had as scum, he wouldn't be too bothered if I did what I did since he's not invested in his experiment. If he's town he'd be more upset. Does that make more sense?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 16:41 GMT
#746
On August 09 2013 01:40 strongandbig wrote:
so clarity's "reaction test" is possible, but unlikely, since it should have been obvious that scum would easily be able to fake anger.

one of the bigger problems for me is why he didn't try to find anything out about what my "plan" was before he intentionally ruined it.

Also why he first said it was just because he was curious about what the other person would think, and then later said he did it on purpose to test my reaction.


Because your reaction was ongoing.

Do you believe I'm scum? If so, and I've asked this before, please explain how what I've done so far is scum motivated.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 16:46 GMT
#748
On August 09 2013 01:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 01:34 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 01:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 09 2013 01:23 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 01:22 Chromatically wrote:
What sort of reaction were you hoping for, clarity?


If he were town he would be genuinely upset that his plan got ruined (he was, and early plans are crap anyway)
If he were scum he would go "dang, you ruined my plan, oh well"

Something along those lines. He did the former, obviously.

What was the point of intentionally ignore SnB questioning you about your lie, multiple times as he said?
What kind of reaction you were hoping for? And how did REDACTED act? Does he come townie to you or what?


I think he's town, yes. Although not for his reaction to what I said.
Thought he was scum for a little bit but that changed. Also not because of his reaction.

So yeah that part was kinda fruitless. Got a real strong townread on snb though.

On August 09 2013 01:23 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 01:22 Chromatically wrote:
What sort of reaction were you hoping for, clarity?


If he were town he would be genuinely upset that his plan got ruined (he was, and early plans are crap anyway)
If he were scum he would go "dang, you ruined my plan, oh well"

Something along those lines. He did the former, obviously.


It's not much of a plan if I just tell him straight away "oh I'm fishing for a reaction from you"

You didn´t really answer me. If you are doing a reaction test you will know he will call you out for lying. You MUST have an answer to that (for reference see what i did in NWM N1) before it happens.

Also when doing reaction tests in off thread comm games you basically gotta have a back up. Someone you tell what are you up to before you do it. Without that reaction tests are either stupid or scum. Mafia can after every mistake they make say "oh, it was just a reaction test", and everyone should believe them? So what was your intention during this whole thing that went on N0 in your place?


I guess? Didn't have one though. The lying part wasn't intentional, it was a mistake.
Me telling the other person snb's rolename was all I did to get a reaction.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 16:54 GMT
#753
I thought he told me he was telling everyone. He didn't.

I don't get how snb's conclusion is that I'm scum. Like, did I, as scum, understand you were only telling me and then decided to lie to REDACTED (lol), telling him you were telling everyone?
How does that help me as scum? Obviously it'll come back to you and I'll get called out for lying.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 16:59 GMT
#757
On August 09 2013 01:57 Risen wrote:
Working on it. Just felt like posting something from my phone while I was on the toilet. Have some definite scum reads.

PSA: Don't post your town reads people. That's just stupid unless you're about to die.


Is Onegu one of them? That'd be pretty cool.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 17:07 GMT
#760
On August 09 2013 02:04 Xatalos wrote:
By the way Clarity, you never responded to my response to your question (about the House member lists)?

snb, what makes Clarity scum from that PM event? What was the Mafia agenda? I can understand losing your trust in him, but it's not the same as being scum. Actually why would a scum want to lose your trust for no reason?


Well I agreed with your answer, actually.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 17:27 GMT
#770
I think me ruining snb's "experiment" isn't even his issue. It's the "lie" which was simply a mistake.
So..... let's move on, yes? A couple of people here can tell you that when I'm town I tend to shine green and when I'm scum I tend to... not shine so green.

Onegu you promised to post your thoughts on everything.
On August 09 2013 01:04 Onegu wrote:
Sorry wifes birthday just back home and processing everything now will post thoughts on everything. First on house baratheon. Koshi looks the worst at first why put himself up after saying he didnt want to be lord, also why not vote for sol, just because DI says he is scum? We also need to hear from sol, why vote a null read over a town read.


Did you cover everything you wanted in the same post?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 17:41 GMT
#780
On August 09 2013 02:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:
SnB, Clarity and REDACTED:

Why can´t you just tell what the reasons for REDACTED is to think Clarity is town?
You are pushing the issue under the carpet after making such a scene out of it first. Why is that?


I'm sure REDACTED will be here at some point and if I'm in danger of being lynched he'll probably share it.
Assume he didn't have a read on me, would you want to lynch me?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 17:52 GMT
#788
I'd like to point out I did say immediately that I didn't believe your claim, but would play along cause the claim was so weird.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 17:54 GMT
#790
Hey rayn, from your giant post:
I have to go after that, i tell people i am gonna vote for myself and why they should vote for me over FT. If they for some reason can´t consolidate on me, i tell them to elect FT, because having no lord at all is the worst thing that can happen.

FT i am leaning scum on for his wishy-washyness.


if you were leaning scum on him why tell your house to elect him? Was there no way to elect one of the other two?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 18:05 GMT
#795
On August 09 2013 03:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 02:54 Clarity_nl wrote:
Hey rayn, from your giant post:
I have to go after that, i tell people i am gonna vote for myself and why they should vote for me over FT. If they for some reason can´t consolidate on me, i tell them to elect FT, because having no lord at all is the worst thing that can happen.

FT i am leaning scum on for his wishy-washyness.


if you were leaning scum on him why tell your house to elect him? Was there no way to elect one of the other two?

Because electing noone is shit and the other people were not running. Even if a house elects mafia as a lord it gives town info. There are 5 lords. People MUST PM with each other (especially Lords). If scumlord, they might out themselves to a town lord.


I understand that not electing someone is terrible. My issue is that if you had a scumread on FT, why not try to convince one of the others to run? Surely you'd try to find a way to not elect your scumread?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 18:06 GMT
#796
On August 09 2013 03:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 02:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
On August 09 2013 02:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.

So events happened like this.

I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever.
Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys?

I read all of this and i´m like wtf?
I am clueless..

so therefore, this is why we dont discuss pm's in detail cause explaining shit is hard. Stick to the thread.

Are you sure Clarity believed your claim? Because he said he didn´t.
If he didn´t, all this proves nothing whatever his alignment is.


I agree with this. Oats disagrees and I'm okay with that.
Then again, if I'm scum and he tells me that, I would probably not give him a rolename and just tell him he's full of it. Just in case. It's not the most absurd role I've ever heard of. (although it comes close)
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 18:14 GMT
#798
On August 09 2013 03:12 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 03:05 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 03:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 09 2013 02:54 Clarity_nl wrote:
Hey rayn, from your giant post:
I have to go after that, i tell people i am gonna vote for myself and why they should vote for me over FT. If they for some reason can´t consolidate on me, i tell them to elect FT, because having no lord at all is the worst thing that can happen.

FT i am leaning scum on for his wishy-washyness.


if you were leaning scum on him why tell your house to elect him? Was there no way to elect one of the other two?

Because electing noone is shit and the other people were not running. Even if a house elects mafia as a lord it gives town info. There are 5 lords. People MUST PM with each other (especially Lords). If scumlord, they might out themselves to a town lord.


I understand that not electing someone is terrible. My issue is that if you had a scumread on FT, why not try to convince one of the others to run? Surely you'd try to find a way to not elect your scumread?

I had no time any more and noone was answering me. There is no reason to have a lord that does not want to be one. They get lazy and we don´t gain information.


I'd like to distinguish between saying they don't want to be lord, and them not running for lord.
Are you telling me 2/4 in your house did not WANT to be lord?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 18:23 GMT
#802
On August 09 2013 03:20 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.

So events happened like this.

I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever.
Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys?


Hmmm..... Clarity, why did you happily pass along snb's role name if you thought that "scum can bluesnipe rolenames"? This chain of events just seems stupid.


As I've said, I thought snb told me he was gonna tell everyone.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 18:27 GMT
#806
On August 09 2013 03:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 03:23 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 03:20 Xatalos wrote:
On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.

So events happened like this.

I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever.
Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys?


Hmmm..... Clarity, why did you happily pass along snb's role name if you thought that "scum can bluesnipe rolenames"? This chain of events just seems stupid.


As I've said, I thought snb told me he was gonna tell everyone.

If you really thought that, then what was the point you telling his rolename to Oats in the first place?


Oh my god we're going in circles. I wanted to see what oats thought and I wanted to see how snb would react.
Guys please, get over it or something.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 18:39 GMT
#814
On August 09 2013 03:28 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 03:23 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 03:20 Xatalos wrote:
On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.

So events happened like this.

I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever.
Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys?


Hmmm..... Clarity, why did you happily pass along snb's role name if you thought that "scum can bluesnipe rolenames"? This chain of events just seems stupid.


As I've said, I thought snb told me he was gonna tell everyone.


I don't see any actual scum motivation in forwarding the role name, so I don't think you even have a reason to lie about this. Definitely not lynchworthy stuff.

What was your basis for hiding Oatsmaster's identity, by the way? Or at least aiding in hiding it? It feels very stupid to argue something for so long with incomplete information.


No real reasoning other than I don't see the point. I don't think Oats' townread on me is justified so it wouldn't change the discussion. Oats tends to be around at this time anyway so why not wait for him.

@Risen

I strongly disagree on Dandel. Yes he kind of messed up the thread but he put himself in the spotlight and put strong pressure on Koshi.

Your case on Xatalos seems compelling but it relies on Xatalos being a good mafia player. I think I recognize the name but haven't been in games with him. That said I see town ask questions to which there is only one answer (or the answer is useless) all the time.

Look at oats his recent post about his pm interaction with me and tell me if that changes your mind about him at all please.
I think you should also look at Oats' filter in the recently played "Titanic Mafia" cause he does this as town.

Grack's "Black Sheep" comment you're misinterpreting I think. It refers to all the other lords being vets and him not being a vet. I haven't really read in to him much so don't have much of an opinion on him.

All in all, your post is huge and has some valid points but you're stretching some stuff and I don't see the reason to post FOUR scumreads, instead of one concise case.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 18:59 GMT
#829
On August 09 2013 03:54 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.

So events happened like this.

I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever.
Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys?

Wait what? YOU are Ser Redacted? And when asked if something interested happened in the confines of your house (Winterfell, apparently), you decided to keep this rather controversial situation to the thread, saying that everything was groovy?

Explain yourself. Also, whatever gambit that was, it is atrocious. It doesn't sound indicative of Clarity's allegiance at all. It sounds like he gave you his real name and you derped it up, by claiming some nonsense name magic. I don't understand at all how you deduce that he is not a Blackfyre infiltrant from that, unless you were already privy to that information and were just dicking around.

While I often find it hard to uncover your motivations for doing things, this seems like a particularly stupid gaff. At first my grievances were with your lord, but it's possible that your entire house is Blackfyre scum?


Yes because obviously with that exchange between me and oats, the possibility that we're both scum somehow still remains?
But yeah, whether I am town or scum I'd have reacted the same way, most likely.
That said, do you think Oats as scum pushes me really hard for my rolename (he underemphasized this, it was like 5 pms each of him asking me rolename and me asking "why?") and then when I refuse to give it he makes up a role like that?

Seems a bit farfetched for scum just to "dick around"
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 19:02 GMT
#834
On August 09 2013 04:01 Risen wrote:
So yeah Clarity's interaction with REDACTED makes much more sense to me now. He told REDACTED about snb's role b/c they were scum mates. Clarity_nl is scum.


So I told Oats snb's rolename, and then oats told snb that I told him his rolename?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 19:02 GMT
#835
What the fuck Risen.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 19:04 GMT
#840
On August 09 2013 04:03 Risen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 04:00 Xatalos wrote:
On August 09 2013 03:53 Oberyn wrote:
Dandel is playing thread bully and I'm strongly considering switching my vote to put him in time out. Nearly every player (koshi, sol, s&B, risen) that has brought up suspicion of dandel, he has responded by attacking their abilities and suggesting that they could be scum. This is extremely indicative of mafia play.

Could the Lannisters explain to me why they felt iamp was the best choice as Lord?


What the heck? If you think that's extremely indicative of Mafia play, you should take a look at DI's earlier games. He's active and spammy as town, inactive and useless as scum. Which do you think fits him here?

I preferred myself, but gumshoe preferred iamperfection and grackaroni also agreed with iamperfection being our Lord. I wasn't opposed to iamperfection either, just preferred myself (naturally I know I can trust myself 100%).


I think the scumteam has coached him to post this way so he appears to be playing to a town meta.


So you agree that he appears like his town meta. But you seem really confident he's scum?
I don't even....
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 19:10 GMT
#848
On August 09 2013 04:07 Risen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 04:05 Onegu wrote:
On August 09 2013 04:01 Risen wrote:
So yeah Clarity's interaction with REDACTED makes much more sense to me now. He told REDACTED about snb's role b/c they were scum mates. Clarity_nl is scum.



This makes zero sense why not do that in scum qt if both scum, or even bring it up to SnB why not keep it to themselves?


Alrighty last post before da beech. I think the PM chain was a scumslip on their part. I think they were supposed to keep it to themselves. I don't think the interaction between Clarity and Oats was supposed to come to light which is why Clarity ended up lying in the PM chain then having to backtrack on it. Clarity probably told Oats the role name, that got revealed because Oats goofed or something, then they had to concoct a story to fit.


Way to take the simplest explanation.

So I as scum told oats as scum (in a pm, instead of in the qt) that snb shared his rolename.
Then, oats, STILL AS SCUM, sent a pm to snb and ACCIDENTALLY told snb that I told him his rolename.

What in the flying fuck
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 19:15 GMT
#853
On August 09 2013 04:13 Chromatically wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 04:10 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 04:07 Risen wrote:
On August 09 2013 04:05 Onegu wrote:
On August 09 2013 04:01 Risen wrote:
So yeah Clarity's interaction with REDACTED makes much more sense to me now. He told REDACTED about snb's role b/c they were scum mates. Clarity_nl is scum.



This makes zero sense why not do that in scum qt if both scum, or even bring it up to SnB why not keep it to themselves?


Alrighty last post before da beech. I think the PM chain was a scumslip on their part. I think they were supposed to keep it to themselves. I don't think the interaction between Clarity and Oats was supposed to come to light which is why Clarity ended up lying in the PM chain then having to backtrack on it. Clarity probably told Oats the role name, that got revealed because Oats goofed or something, then they had to concoct a story to fit.


Way to take the simplest explanation.

So I as scum told oats as scum (in a pm, instead of in the qt) that snb shared his rolename.
Then, oats, STILL AS SCUM, sent a pm to snb and ACCIDENTALLY told snb that I told him his rolename.

What in the flying fuck

You think this makes him scum?


I have no fucking clue. But I hate the argument "too dumb to be scum"
He's really out there though, not a good lynch day1

Although Risen. The way you're currently playing (you currently have FIVE scumreads, FOUR of which are apparantly strong) is disruptive. Tone it down and take a bit more time to come to conclusions
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 19:45 GMT
#872
rayn are you going to be like this all game? He made a mistake, obviously.

On August 09 2013 04:29 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 04:25 iamperfection wrote:
On August 09 2013 04:22 Acrofales wrote:
On August 09 2013 04:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Acrofales do you think Grackaroni is mafia?

All I know about Grackaroni is what you have told me, which is not conclusive at all. How am I to form an opinion without more information about your internal bickerings over there on those godforsaken isles?

wat grack is in my house?

Err, wait. Grack was the black lion, not the black kraken.

I still have not much opinion. His explanation of his behaviour to us seems quite okay, but he hasn't done much other than announce who are his family members. I still don't have much of an opinion of him one way or another. He seems to have some thoughts, which is okay, I guess, but nothing particularly useful.


Please stop doing this unless you're going to come to a conclusion. Otherwise just correct him instead of filling a whole page with this crap.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 20:08 GMT
#878
On August 09 2013 05:02 kushm4sta wrote:
All this redacted stuff is confusing after the fact...who did we learn was scum? clarity?


Everytime it says redacted, insert oats.

On August 09 2013 05:03 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 03:39 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 03:28 Xatalos wrote:
On August 09 2013 03:23 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 03:20 Xatalos wrote:
On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.

So events happened like this.

I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever.
Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys?


Hmmm..... Clarity, why did you happily pass along snb's role name if you thought that "scum can bluesnipe rolenames"? This chain of events just seems stupid.


As I've said, I thought snb told me he was gonna tell everyone.


I don't see any actual scum motivation in forwarding the role name, so I don't think you even have a reason to lie about this. Definitely not lynchworthy stuff.

What was your basis for hiding Oatsmaster's identity, by the way? Or at least aiding in hiding it? It feels very stupid to argue something for so long with incomplete information.

Your case on Xatalos seems compelling but it relies on Xatalos being a good mafia player.


By the way how was Risen's case "compelling" at all...? It was based on DI being scum and similarly stupid assumptions. The only somewhat reasonable point in there was me asking filler questions and you even continued by saying that you "see townies asking questions with only one answer all the time"...........

Also, don't you consider me a good scum player? I think I'm much better as scum than as town.


The thing you pointed out as justified was compelling. I liked your admission of it though.
I don't think I've played with you at all (maybe once a long time ago) so I don't consider you anything.
Me saying "it relies on him being a good player" was more of a question than a statement.

On August 09 2013 05:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 04:45 Clarity_nl wrote:
rayn are you going to be like this all game? He made a mistake, obviously.

On August 09 2013 04:29 Acrofales wrote:
On August 09 2013 04:25 iamperfection wrote:
On August 09 2013 04:22 Acrofales wrote:
On August 09 2013 04:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Acrofales do you think Grackaroni is mafia?

All I know about Grackaroni is what you have told me, which is not conclusive at all. How am I to form an opinion without more information about your internal bickerings over there on those godforsaken isles?

wat grack is in my house?

Err, wait. Grack was the black lion, not the black kraken.

I still have not much opinion. His explanation of his behaviour to us seems quite okay, but he hasn't done much other than announce who are his family members. I still don't have much of an opinion of him one way or another. He seems to have some thoughts, which is okay, I guess, but nothing particularly useful.


Please stop doing this unless you're going to come to a conclusion. Otherwise just correct him instead of filling a whole page with this crap.

I´m sorry, that was not obvious to me because of the RP.
You did not answer me btw. What do you think of FT & Onegu?


I think onegu smells fishy, mainly because of him soft defending people twice (FT and myself). I think the reasons in your giant opening post are less than stellar, though.
I don't know anything about FT except for what's been posted about n0 pms
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 20:14 GMT
#880
On August 09 2013 05:12 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 05:08 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 05:02 kushm4sta wrote:
All this redacted stuff is confusing after the fact...who did we learn was scum? clarity?


Everytime it says redacted, insert oats.

On August 09 2013 05:03 Xatalos wrote:
On August 09 2013 03:39 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 03:28 Xatalos wrote:
On August 09 2013 03:23 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 03:20 Xatalos wrote:
On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.

So events happened like this.

I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever.
Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys?


Hmmm..... Clarity, why did you happily pass along snb's role name if you thought that "scum can bluesnipe rolenames"? This chain of events just seems stupid.


As I've said, I thought snb told me he was gonna tell everyone.


I don't see any actual scum motivation in forwarding the role name, so I don't think you even have a reason to lie about this. Definitely not lynchworthy stuff.

What was your basis for hiding Oatsmaster's identity, by the way? Or at least aiding in hiding it? It feels very stupid to argue something for so long with incomplete information.

Your case on Xatalos seems compelling but it relies on Xatalos being a good mafia player.


By the way how was Risen's case "compelling" at all...? It was based on DI being scum and similarly stupid assumptions. The only somewhat reasonable point in there was me asking filler questions and you even continued by saying that you "see townies asking questions with only one answer all the time"...........

Also, don't you consider me a good scum player? I think I'm much better as scum than as town.


The thing you pointed out as justified was compelling. I liked your admission of it though.
I don't think I've played with you at all (maybe once a long time ago) so I don't consider you anything.
Me saying "it relies on him being a good player" was more of a question than a statement.

On August 09 2013 05:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 09 2013 04:45 Clarity_nl wrote:
rayn are you going to be like this all game? He made a mistake, obviously.

On August 09 2013 04:29 Acrofales wrote:
On August 09 2013 04:25 iamperfection wrote:
On August 09 2013 04:22 Acrofales wrote:
On August 09 2013 04:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Acrofales do you think Grackaroni is mafia?

All I know about Grackaroni is what you have told me, which is not conclusive at all. How am I to form an opinion without more information about your internal bickerings over there on those godforsaken isles?

wat grack is in my house?

Err, wait. Grack was the black lion, not the black kraken.

I still have not much opinion. His explanation of his behaviour to us seems quite okay, but he hasn't done much other than announce who are his family members. I still don't have much of an opinion of him one way or another. He seems to have some thoughts, which is okay, I guess, but nothing particularly useful.


Please stop doing this unless you're going to come to a conclusion. Otherwise just correct him instead of filling a whole page with this crap.

I´m sorry, that was not obvious to me because of the RP.
You did not answer me btw. What do you think of FT & Onegu?


I think onegu smells fishy, mainly because of him soft defending people twice (FT and myself). I think the reasons in your giant opening post are less than stellar, though.
I don't know anything about FT except for what's been posted about n0 pms


Hm. How come that filler point was the compelling part of his case, yet you continued with "I see townies asking questions with only one answer all the time"? Or was that more of a mitigating point to the original point?


That was saying that that point on itself does not a scum make, yes.
Maybe compelling was the wrong word to use. It had some merit is what I was trying to say.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 20:15 GMT
#881
on its own*
English is hard.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 20:36 GMT
#885
I can tell you that vivax told me he didn't run for lord because he wouldn't be that active in the earlygame but that's about it.
Oats seems to have a townread on him but I haven't conversed with him much. Nothing alignment indicative anyway.
Looking at that post though, it seems more aggressive towards Koshi than defensive towards Oats. Although the post itself does both, obviously.

After the game we just played together, I can't say I blame him for not calling Koshi scum at this point. (Titanic Mafia)
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 20:53 GMT
#887
I like being a traffic cop. Traffic being smooth is important.
Do I have any scumreads? No strong ones, Onegu probably my strongest. We'll see what Risen does when he comes back.

You say Dandel looks town but his lord campaign was "odd" (what does that mean?) and he lied to you?
Another question: Do you think the line you bolded makes sense to think of as scum? I definitely don't think that a 3p would talk about the idea of a 3p. I don't see how this line of thought would be more likely to come from scum than from town.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 21:37 GMT
#911
If you had made notes while reading the thread you should already know every house' list.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 21:47 GMT
#918
vivax is in stark, gumshoe is in lannister
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 21:53 GMT
#922
Why is this conversation happening in the thread as opposed to pms?

#Trafficcop
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 22:01 GMT
#925
On August 09 2013 06:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 06:53 Clarity_nl wrote:
Why is this conversation happening in the thread as opposed to pms?

#Trafficcop

If you mean me & Acro, it already happened in PM´s..


Why is it happening again in the thread? Are you accusing him of something? Or are you trying to convince him his plan (whatever it is) is bad?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 22:01 GMT
#926
On August 09 2013 06:55 jrkirby wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 06:53 Clarity_nl wrote:
Why is this conversation happening in the thread as opposed to pms?

#Trafficcop


We cannot PM people outside our houses, right?


lords can pm all other lords
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 08 2013 22:23 GMT
#932
No it's not. I did do something he asked me not to do, though.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 07:55 GMT
#1033
On August 09 2013 11:15 s0Lstice wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 06:53 Clarity_nl wrote:
Why is this conversation happening in the thread as opposed to pms?

#Trafficcop


Clarity my boy. I see no reason not to assume that you think your play so far has been pro-town. With that said, what are you doing here? If your thread directing is useful and pro-town, what is with the self-conscious acknowledgement of the behavior? If it's protown then you should just be carrying on. It seems like you have some inherent guilt here.


Merely poking fun at you for calling me a traffic cop. Ofcourse I become aware of it when you point it out.
I don't know how that's inherent guilt, or why, as any alignment, I would feel guilty for trying to avoid people shitting up the thread.

Are you calling me scum, or are you just pointing out something as "noteworthy"? If you're gonna push something, push it.

On August 09 2013 08:35 Chromatically wrote:
Why isn't everyone voting Sol already?


I agree with this.

The rayn/acro shitfest that happened was dumb. One side saying that the other is COMPLETELY MISREPRESENTING ME when they use a slightly different word or interpretation is useless.
I dunno why you guys are voting eachother, but please find out if your vote is to lynch or if your vote is OMGUS.

rayn saying "I'll reconsider my read if you tell me the plan" can easily come from town
Likewise, acro being protective of his plan seems more likely town than scum. Issues with oberyn not withstanding (he called it a joint effort so you think he's scum?)

In fact, oberyn..... please walk me through this
You vote him because he is buddying up to you.. fair enough I guess? Not sure how that makes him more likely scum that solstice but let's roll with it.
On August 09 2013 08:20 Oberyn wrote:
I'm not really sure what you're rambling about Acro. You essentially took my plan from my first post, decided that you and me worked on it together (I have no idea where that comes from) and now won't share it for whatever reason.

I'm still suspicious of sol, but for now I'm going to:

##Unvote
##Vote Acrofales

Then you emphasize the buddying up part:
On August 09 2013 08:50 Oberyn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 08:24 Acrofales wrote:
On August 09 2013 08:20 Oberyn wrote:
I'm not really sure what you're rambling about Acro. You essentially took my plan from my first post, decided that you and me worked on it together (I have no idea where that comes from) and now won't share it for whatever reason.

I'm still suspicious of sol, but for now I'm going to:

##Unvote
##Vote Acrofales

What the hell are you smoking? Here is the first thing you sent to me about using magic:


Onegu told me that he wants to use the hp check on day one, which would give the mafia an idea of how many kp it takes to eliminate a player with their night hits. I've had a town read on him otherwise. Do you think there is any benefit to wanting to use it early as town?


Here is your second missive, after my reply:

You say that it is important for us to know to coordinate our shots, but then want to use it on your own hosue? Does that suggest that you want the Lords to fire in your house? Wouldn't it make more sense to use it on the house you want to fire into?


And MY REPLY to that is the plan.

After this we have not communicated about using the magic, and were discussing Yamato.


Exactly. Nothing there points to us working together on come to your plan. It gives me the creeps that you decide to bring up three different times that I helped formulate the idea as if we're working behind the scenes to come up with something incredibly pro-town. I feel like you're buddying up to me in that sense. Furthermore, the plan isn't so great that you have to keep it a secret from rayn. You're overstating your contribution right now.

Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 06:44 Acrofales wrote:
Are you upset because I am unwilling to disclose with you the way the Red Viper, Sharrant and myself came up with a way of potentially foiling a Blackfyre plot by using our life check magic?


Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 08:11 Acrofales wrote:
I also made an allusion to the plan concocted by Sharrant, the Red Viper and myself


Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 06:44 Acrofales wrote:
Are you upset because I am unwilling to disclose with you the way the Red Viper, Sharrant and myself came up with.



All is cool up until this point. He's buddying up to you, he's overstating his contributions. These are decent points.
Here comes the thing I have an issue with though:
On August 09 2013 09:02 Oberyn wrote:
More on Acrofales:

I first contact him via pm's because I found his conclusion that DI and koshi are both town quite puzzling. When I asked about it futher, he explained that he doesn't think DI truly thinks that sol and koshi are scum, he is simply pressuring them. Based on DI's emotional tunnel, I certainly do not draw the same conclusion. He also inadequately explains why koshi is town. He states that DI is overreacting on his views about koshi., but how is this indicative of koshi's alignment? He states that he isn't interested in considering a koshi lynch, but doesn't provide a solid reason. Furthermore, if you earlier thought that DI was faking his read on koshi to pressure him, how is he suddenly overreacting on his read? That's a contradiction.

Initially, he thought that it was a good idea to use the health check simply to figure out the hp system. This is incredibly anti-town. When I attack him for his plan, he quickly drops it.

Acro's house is a slew of inactives, but he has shown little interest in dealing with them.

In the thread, Acro has said a lot of nothing. He is using the role playing nonsense to cover up the fact that he isn't sharing many strong reads. I see little reason why he shouldn't be considered for a lynch today.

Suddenly every interaction you've ever had with acro points to him being scum? Why didn't we hear from this earlier?
You had not mentioned any of these points until now. Could anyone from Oberyn's house say if he ever mentioned these things before, and whether or not he talked about acro possibly being scum?

You had a vote on him for one concise reason, implying you could lynch him for just that reason, and then you felt the need to suddenly attach 5 more reasons.
Why is that, Oberyn?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 08:47 GMT
#1035
Yes.

If he believed him to be scum enough to vote him over solstice (while stating he's still suspicious of solstice) why does he feel the need to add more reasons to his vote?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 08:56 GMT
#1036
Let me put it this way.

In chronological order:

1. He takes advantage of the mess rayn and acro have created by voting for acro
2. He then goes back and explains why his reasoning in his votepost makes sense (this is fine)
3. He now shows that he went back and looked at his interactions with acro

Why did he not look back at the interactions before voting him? Surely you look back at it BEFORE you vote someone?
I believe he is scum who tried to take advantage of the situation, and acted too quickly, started doubting that the reasons he posted in thread looked genuine, so he went back and slapped on everything that he could twist to look scummy.
He had not mentioned acro at all before this point.

If anyone has received pms from oberyn in which he expresses concern of acro being scum prior to the rayn/acro outburst then I might be willing to change my mind on this.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 09:06 GMT
#1041
On August 09 2013 18:02 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 17:47 Clarity_nl wrote:
Yes.

If he believed him to be scum enough to vote him over solstice (while stating he's still suspicious of solstice) why does he feel the need to add more reasons to his vote?


Hmmm. I don't really see that as a scum-only motivation. Scum would certainly have reason to pile more suspicion on their target after selecting him, but similarly town can be consumed by confirmation bias and focus on convincing others of their read. Look at Dandel Ion's tunnel on Koshi, for example.


Do you believe his original reasoning for voting acro was enough to vote him, especially over solstice at that point?

FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 09:22 GMT
#1049
On August 09 2013 18:15 Grackaroni wrote:
ok 15 minutes past and nobody read my post. cya tomorrow guys


I read it. I don't really agree simply because I see townies do this all the time. They enter like halfway through day 1 but act like it's still the first hours of the game. Because to them it feels that way.

Could you comment on my points on Oberyn? didn't think I'd need to ask, since you seemed willing to look into people if we asked you and I just made a giant post about him..
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 09:34 GMT
#1053
On August 09 2013 18:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Another thing. In Oberyn´s defense he was suspicious of Acro before our thing happened. He expressed his suspicion to me in PM´s and told me to not tell anyone about that (as there was this house HP stuff going on, he wanted more information from Acro regarding that). So i can see why he voted / laid out his case on Acro when he did and it makes sense to me.


Hmmm, okay. Could you specify what he said to you, does it match the reasons he laid out after his vote post?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 09:58 GMT
#1061
On August 09 2013 18:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 18:34 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 18:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Another thing. In Oberyn´s defense he was suspicious of Acro before our thing happened. He expressed his suspicion to me in PM´s and told me to not tell anyone about that (as there was this house HP stuff going on, he wanted more information from Acro regarding that). So i can see why he voted / laid out his case on Acro when he did and it makes sense to me.


Hmmm, okay. Could you specify what he said to you, does it match the reasons he laid out after his vote post?


First we started talking about Onegu (his suggestion of using the house HP check), i told Oberyn this:
"Onegu´s suggestion is beyond stupid or scummy. Why should we give mafia information about how many HP people have, od D1, when there is not much to go with? Have you tried to ask his reasoning for that?"

Oberyn agreed with me. Then he said he finds it weird Acrofales agrees with Onegu and wants to use the HP check on their own house because it´s important for the lords to know about the HP so they can direct KP accordingly. Then he said Acro is his biggest suspect at the moment and asked me to not share this with anyone yet so he could keep questioning him.

Me:
"Hmm.. Ask him (Acro) about his motives to use the HP check. I find that extremely anti-town thing to do at this point, at least if a scum!Lord uses it (as they get the information). Assuming mafia does not know how much HP people have they are in the same boat with us townies right now. there is no reason to push that information to be known right now as mafia is the holder of the KP besides us lords. It does not help town at all. Keep up messaging with Acro, and keep me informed. "

Oberyn then told me that Acro had misunderstood the check as a single target check (i assume this means that you can pick one person - when in fact it´s a full house) and in that case Acro´s suggestion is not that scummy. First Acro had told Oberyn he thinks it should be used on D1 to find out about hp, which Oberyn thought was scummy, but then he had said it should be used to confirm lord kp, which was in Oberyn´s mind less scummy (i didin´t really get what that meant).

Me:
"Okay, if that´s true what you said about Acro it´s not a scumtell. I mean if he thought the check was not single. As k him how he can possibly think so (single target) when the OP clearly says otherwise. Pressure him on that. If he is mafia he might fuck up."

And that´s the last time we have talked about Acrofales.


So you're saying that in speaking to you he never mentioned any of these reasons for acro possibly being scum:
On August 09 2013 09:02 Oberyn wrote:
More on Acrofales:

I first contact him via pm's because I found his conclusion that DI and koshi are both town quite puzzling. When I asked about it futher, he explained that he doesn't think DI truly thinks that sol and koshi are town, he is simply pressuring them. Based on DI's emotional tunnel, I certainly do not draw the same conclusion. He also inadequately explains why koshi is town. He states that DI is overreacting on his views about koshi., but how is this indicative of koshi's alignment? He states that he isn't interested in considering a koshi lynch, but doesn't provide a solid reason. Furthermore, if you earlier thought that DI was faking his read on koshi to pressure him, how is he suddenly overreacting on his read? That's a contradiction.

Initially, he thought that it was a good idea to use the health check simply to figure out the hp system. This is incredibly anti-town. When I attack him for his plan, he quickly drops it.

Acro's house is a slew of inactives, but he has shown little interest in dealing with them.

In the thread, Acro has said a lot of nothing. He is using the role playing nonsense to cover up the fact that he isn't sharing many strong reads. I see little reason why he shouldn't be considered for a lynch today.


Also notice how he does not mention that acro told him he thought the hp check was on a single person, and how, if that were true, it wouldn't be so anti-town.
He just mentions how [the initial way he perceived acro's idea was very anti town]

On August 09 2013 18:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Another thing. In Oberyn´s defense he was suspicious of Acro before our thing happened. He expressed his suspicion to me in PM´s and told me to not tell anyone about that (as there was this house HP stuff going on, he wanted more information from Acro regarding that). So i can see why he voted / laid out his case on Acro when he did and it makes sense to me.


So... why are you defending him? The way you explained your pms it discredits one of his points on acro, and all the other points it turns out he never mentioned to you when he was discussing his suspicion.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 10:00 GMT
#1063
On August 09 2013 18:50 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 18:21 Xatalos wrote:
On August 09 2013 18:00 Grackaroni wrote:
Finally read the thread, I am most suspicious of Jrkirby. First off Nobody in House Martell has gotten a good read off of him because nobody in House Martell really talked to each. The best contribution in thread he made was calling out S0lstice for not electing his town read and naming 2 people town who the majority of town has already agreed were town.

After that he started making posts such

On August 09 2013 06:35 jrkirby wrote:
Finally, why have all the houses not posted a list of their members yet?

I think that it's actually beneficial to town to post these lists, and here's why:

1) Once scum have a list of 5 of the houses, they have a list of every house.

2) in a 24 player game, scum almost guaranteed have 4-6 members. Scum are spread out (I think it's random or something, right?) so they already know probably 3-4 houses at the start.

3) 2 (or is it 3?) houses have already posted their list. There's a good chance this fills in the missing info for scum.

4) All the house lists will probably be posted by day 2 anyway. Scum will only be missing this info for a short time.

5) Scum know all the lords already. This further helps them fill in the gaps.

6) Knowing the houses is not too beneficial to scum. Scum are more likely to want to eliminate every non-scum player in a house than an entire house (based off my possibly flawed logic - they can use this to WIFOM, be careful).

7) Knowing the houses is beneficial to town. We can help predict who will be lord in later days, we can help predict who is likely to be shot. We know who can PM a certain player, so it's easier to find people with reads on them. We don't think two people are on a scumteam together when they're just house buddies. Things are simpler, we don't get confused when REDACTED is posted. The list goes on.

8) Displaying all houses gives more info to town than it gives to scum.

9) Transparency is beneficial to town, and giving out house lists helps with transparency.

I can think of one good reason why we might not want to give out house lists:

1) There might be 3P that wants to eliminate a house, or secondary objectives for scum to eliminate a house. This is entirely speculation though, so I don't put too much weight into it.

This is a post that I would be ok with if it was in the start of the game, but he chose to talk about this during a time when scumhunting was actually taking place and he could actually participate in conversation.
On August 09 2013 06:41 jrkirby wrote:
One question I would like to ask the thread: Does anyone KNOW how much HP they have? I do not know how much HP I have. If you know, obviously I'm not asking you to announce how much HP you have to the thread. Actually, don't even say that you know how much HP you have. I just want to announce that I do not know how much HP I have.

This could be beneficial to town because then they can do better speculation on what people's roles are like.

Choosing to talk about setup rather than scumhunting and he has already disappeared without really pressuring or conversing with anybody

Everyone else has seemed engaged in the current conversations and actively scumhunting and these posts just didn't fit in with what I think a townie would be posting about during the time of the thread. He seems like he is more interested in blending into town than scumhunting.

There was an exchange between Oats and Yamato at the start of the game that rubbed me the wrong way. It was so disruptive and anti-town, that I have trouble believing that it came from 2 town players. It didn't seem normal to me and I even got a little bit of a staged feeling (as in they could be both scum randomly attacking each other at the start of the game). I think remember someone claiming they were probably town for being aggressive but some scum are more comfortable getting in arguments with people to help buff up their post count and mask their lack of contributions.

@Xata/Clarity/anyone awake. Is there anybody you would like me to comment on before i go to bed?


I certainly don't like jrkirby's weak thread presence. It's also weird to be so focused on setup, HP and such. He isn't even a Lord, so why is he interested in players' HP? Maybe he's scum?

In any case, grackaroni, what do you think of s0Lstice, Koshi, Acro and Oberyn?


Koshi read town to me in his arguments with DI. (DI too)

I'm willing to forgive s0Lstice's choosing chromatically over Di because he was obviously caught up in an EPEEN measuring contest with DI and I think judging from both Koshi and s0Lstice's reactions to DI, DI was being obnoxious and it made him act irrationally. (not choose DI out of spite, justify it to himself with the possible waste of house power for nothing)

Acro I'm really not sure about, I'll look over him tomorrow because I actually am tired.

As for Jrkirby. @clarity, how many of those inexperienced players made posts like that in the middle of the game and then left without really talking about any player with anyone?


A lot? Especially if they just caught up to the thread. I've done this myself. You read 25-30 pages and then you have to process all the information. So what do you talk about? The stuff you thought about before reading those pages.

I'm not saying he can't be scum but your reasons don't convince me.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 11:05 GMT
#1079
Any thoughts on Oberyn dandel?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 11:16 GMT
#1081
Did you intentionally not comment on the points I brought up with that answer?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 11:29 GMT
#1084
On August 09 2013 20:19 Xatalos wrote:
Release the Gracken!

Rayn, are you sure? That's not how I understood the rules at all. DrParnassus, what's your take on this matter?

"Each house has an X kp shot every night cycle (combined, so shot every 72 hours) which is used by whoever is currently lord. They must pm the mods to send in the house kp and the action will go through as soon as a mod sees the pm."

Since Oberyn already suspected Acro before coming to the conclusion of voting for him, I don't think it's really unnatural to tunnel for a bit and search for more reasons for Acro to be scum. I've done that as town and as scum, so I don't think it's too alignment indicative. I think it's more suspicious to avoid currently relevant topics, as DI mentioned.

iamperfection, are you still vouching for a lurker lynch? Wouldn't KP fit that task much better?


You don't think is weird that even though acro told oberyn that he thought the hp check was on a person rather than a house, oberyn failed to mention this in his post?
Oberyn told rayn that if acro was speaking the truth about that, it's not anti-town.

He also failed to mention any of the reasons he posted in thread to rayn, even though he was supposedly discussing his read with rayn, enough so that he didn't want rayn to tell anyone else his thoughts.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 12:04 GMT
#1087
On August 09 2013 20:54 Xatalos wrote:
Clarity, do you have other scumreads than Oberyn by the way?


I think solstice is a good lynch today unless something strange happens. His scumread on johnny makes no sense to me and his lord vote is obviously silly. Not voting DL despite having a townread on him because if he's scum he'll betray himself anyway...?

Onegu feels scummy, the way he rapidly comes to people's defense, other than that he hasn't done much.

Other than that, no not really. Risen is weird but scum doesn't just post 6 terrible scumreads in the span of an hour and then goes "BYE GUYS, DA BEECH"
I liked him pointing out FT's opening post being scummy as hell.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 12:14 GMT
#1088
I am also underwhelmed by iamp. He got voted lord but he doesn't seem to be doing much in thread.
Maybe he's more active in pms?

That said, I've played with iamp before (2012 though) and this seems to be his style.
I don't disagree that lurkers need to be pressured, although as has been pointed out we have house KP for that, and hopefully iamp will agree with this.

All the lords definitely need to have some form of conclusion about what abilities are used, on who and what time.
Whether they share their conclusion in thread or not is up to them, but there should be an explanation of what was done the following day for sure (unless I'm not foreseeing some sort of plan that needs to keep most people in the dark)
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 12:27 GMT
#1090
Yeah FT has decent points about Acro.
That said his first post WAS scummy as hell. It became less scummy when he explained what he meant.
I don't think FT is scum at the moment, but Risen was correct to call him out on it.

Did Onegu soft defend people in NWM the way he's done at least twice this game?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 12:56 GMT
#1103
I didn't mention the hp check because it wasn't part of my case? I'm not sure what you're referring too based on that last statement.

You did mention the hp check.

On August 09 2013 09:02 Oberyn wrote:
More on Acrofales:

I first contact him via pm's because I found his conclusion that DI and koshi are both town quite puzzling. When I asked about it futher, he explained that he doesn't think DI truly thinks that sol and koshi are town, he is simply pressuring them. Based on DI's emotional tunnel, I certainly do not draw the same conclusion. He also inadequately explains why koshi is town. He states that DI is overreacting on his views about koshi., but how is this indicative of koshi's alignment? He states that he isn't interested in considering a koshi lynch, but doesn't provide a solid reason. Furthermore, if you earlier thought that DI was faking his read on koshi to pressure him, how is he suddenly overreacting on his read? That's a contradiction.

Initially, he thought that it was a good idea to use the health check simply to figure out the hp system. This is incredibly anti-town. When I attack him for his plan, he quickly drops it.

Acro's house is a slew of inactives, but he has shown little interest in dealing with them.

In the thread, Acro has said a lot of nothing. He is using the role playing nonsense to cover up the fact that he isn't sharing many strong reads. I see little reason why he shouldn't be considered for a lynch today.


My issue isn't that you gave multiple reasons for a scumread and a vote, my issue with it is that it's all backwards.

You vote acro for ONE reason, and then you suddenly have 6 more reasons to call him scum. One of which is a strong misrepresentation. None of the others reasons were discussed by you anywhere before.
Why do you tell rayn you have a scumread on acro but don't give him reasons AND tell him to not tell anyone else.

You mention you said it to multiple players, who else? Did you give them reasons or is it the same as with rayn?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 13:09 GMT
#1110
Look acro, I can understand you but realize that you just used 3 full lines to say you disagree with me and you thought his case was bad. Just drop the RP please, it's tedious to read.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 13:16 GMT
#1115
You told onegu it was a pressure vote? Was it?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 13:24 GMT
#1120
On August 09 2013 22:22 Oberyn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 22:16 Clarity_nl wrote:
You told onegu it was a pressure vote? Was it?


As opposed to a vote meant to not pressure him? Yes I wanted a reaction.

Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 03:53 Oberyn wrote:
I feel your interest into Dandel ebbed out very quickly, I'm curious to hear about the development of your read so far. With Acrofales entering the scene Dandel seemed to be forgotten for you (you mention him when questioning s0lstice's read, but you don't push him, or confront him with questions), although you called his behaviour out as extremely scummy.


It hasn't changed and I just asked him a few things less than an hour ago, but he's playing hard to get. I don't think sol and dandel are both scum, which is the part time trying to figure out.


Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 00:06 Vivax wrote:
That said, it would be interesting to know who the lords are considering for kp-lynch. An agreement is needed soon.


Suggestions?

Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 22:16 Xatalos wrote:
On August 09 2013 22:14 Oberyn wrote:
On August 09 2013 21:56 Clarity_nl wrote:
I didn't mention the hp check because it wasn't part of my case? I'm not sure what you're referring too based on that last statement.

You did mention the hp check.


You're misunderstanding what I'm referring to. The 1-shot single target hp check was what I did not mention and was what Acro did not understand. I'm referring to when Acro wanted to use the 1-shot house hp check for no real reason other than to figure out the hp system.

On August 09 2013 21:56 Clarity_nl wrote:
Why do you tell rayn you have a scumread on acro but don't give him reasons AND tell him to not tell anyone else.


We discussed the scummy setup analysis. I told him to not tell anyone because I wanted Acro to be more open in PMs if he thought I trusted him.

On August 09 2013 21:56 Clarity_nl wrote:
You mention you said it to multiple players, who else? Did you give them reasons or is it the same as with rayn?


rayn and chrom mainly. I told Onegu that it was a pressure vote. I don't give any other reasoning, nor was I asked really.


Could you make a summary of your thought process in this issue? You lost me somewhere along the way.


At this point I'd rather focus more on other players than myself, unless there was something about Acro that you don't follow.


As opposed to a vote to lynch him because he's scum.
I understand the two are not mutually exclusive but if it's so obvious that every vote is a pressure vote then why did you tell onegu it was a pressure vote?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 13:38 GMT
#1137
On August 09 2013 22:37 kushm4sta wrote:
yeah sorry about my terrible activity this just started at an unexpectedly bad time.
i will allow my lynch if you want but ONLY based on policy because I do this shit as town for like the past 5 games straight


?

Well you're here now. Any thoughts... about you know, anything?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 13:41 GMT
#1142
iamp I agree with most of your post.
Vivax however... he told me early on he wouldn't be that active earlygame (it's why he didn't run)
Why not keep him around another day and see if he picks it up? As you say he's a pretty good player to have around if he's town

Gumshoe and Sharrant.... Sharrant just hasn't been around, has he pmed much?
Gumshoe however was super active in pregame and suddenly doesn't post nearly all of day1?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 13:42 GMT
#1146
On August 09 2013 22:41 kushm4sta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 22:38 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 22:37 kushm4sta wrote:
yeah sorry about my terrible activity this just started at an unexpectedly bad time.
i will allow my lynch if you want but ONLY based on policy because I do this shit as town for like the past 5 games straight


?

Well you're here now. Any thoughts... about you know, anything?


hi clarity i appreciate your engagement with me.
the answer to your question is a resounding no.


Could you produce some before the day is over please? You're not getting lynched but you might get killed by the lords.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 13:44 GMT
#1148
On August 09 2013 22:42 Koshi wrote:
iamp why do you have a strong townread on Oats?

He entered the thread getting into a discussion with Yamato about why it is bad to release the names of the houses, which might be because he is town and he is concerned about it but aren't chances higher that he did it to stop scumhunting? Oats also asks stupid questions to everybody that tried to actually start scumhunting to draw them away from that. Sure it puts Oats in the spotlight but it also shits up the thread and it is hard for the other person that is discussing with Oats to not respond to these stupid questions.

Oats DID NOT PUT HIS THOUGHTS clearly in this thread. What kind of bullshit is that? He currently has 5 townreads. 3 members of his house because they are "nice and shit", DI because "he is agressive and shit" and Acro because his constructed posts are constructed.

I don't see why everybody thinks Oats is town.


You were in that last game oats played in with me, right? See a resemblance?
Also consider the pm stuff with me (he posted a really sloppy messy version of it, but it gets the point across)
Does he seem likely to do something like that as scum?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 13:45 GMT
#1153
On August 09 2013 22:44 kushm4sta wrote:
I just wanna say also my town style is to do nothing until late game because I dont like wading through all the early game spam. I like to wait until a bunch of people die because it makes it easier to find scum and the game more pleasurable to play. Right now it's pretty much a crap shoot.

omg people are gonna say dude why dont you play small games then?


I'm more likely to ask why do you play in games at all. That's postgame stuff though.
Could you get over your anxiety of information and read the thread and tell us anything that sticks out to you before the daycycle is over?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 13:47 GMT
#1157
On August 09 2013 22:45 iamperfection wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 22:41 Clarity_nl wrote:
iamp I agree with most of your post.
Vivax however... he told me early on he wouldn't be that active earlygame (it's why he didn't run)
Why not keep him around another day and see if he picks it up? As you say he's a pretty good player to have around if he's town

Gumshoe and Sharrant.... Sharrant just hasn't been around, has he pmed much?
Gumshoe however was super active in pregame and suddenly doesn't post nearly all of day1?

or he didnt run because he is scum it didnt want to be in the spotlight

i dont get the deal with gumshoe at all he seemed very interested in pms but totally mia


Yes, I'm not exclusing that possibility but I don't think he's a good lynch today.

From my memory you've almost religiously avoided talking about solstice, could you share your thoughts on him and his possible lynch please?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 13:49 GMT
#1162
On August 09 2013 22:46 Koshi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 22:44 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 22:42 Koshi wrote:
iamp why do you have a strong townread on Oats?

He entered the thread getting into a discussion with Yamato about why it is bad to release the names of the houses, which might be because he is town and he is concerned about it but aren't chances higher that he did it to stop scumhunting? Oats also asks stupid questions to everybody that tried to actually start scumhunting to draw them away from that. Sure it puts Oats in the spotlight but it also shits up the thread and it is hard for the other person that is discussing with Oats to not respond to these stupid questions.

Oats DID NOT PUT HIS THOUGHTS clearly in this thread. What kind of bullshit is that? He currently has 5 townreads. 3 members of his house because they are "nice and shit", DI because "he is agressive and shit" and Acro because his constructed posts are constructed.

I don't see why everybody thinks Oats is town.


You were in that last game oats played in with me, right? See a resemblance?
Also consider the pm stuff with me (he posted a really sloppy messy version of it, but it gets the point across)
Does he seem likely to do something like that as scum?

No I don't see a resembles. Last game he pushed his scumread JAT on day 1. Pushed FT till he saw a townslip and then pushed JAT for the rest of the day. This day he gave 5 townreads?

Why are you defending Oats 24/7? Saying things like "I understand why Oats wants to kill Koshi after last game". I have not trolled in this game and I tried to enter this game with reads and serious play.


He's my Stark bro, bro. But you're right I should let him speak for himself.
I'm aware you have not trolled today, and I kind of understand why you didn't do much the first half of day 1, since you were under pressure from DL, but what are you gonna do for us today Koshi?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 15:07 GMT
#1188
On August 09 2013 23:12 Koshi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 23:00 Vivax wrote:
On August 09 2013 22:54 Koshi wrote:
On August 09 2013 00:06 Vivax wrote:
On August 08 2013 21:20 Koshi wrote:
On August 08 2013 19:55 Oatsmaster wrote:
On August 08 2013 19:47 Koshi wrote:
@ Oats. Tell me why you have townreads on your house. Don't use names but you can at least tell us WHY they are town. It's impossible to actually know if somebody is town in your house. At this point I think Oats his house is filled with scum only.

Why I have townreads on the dudes? Cause they are nice and helpful and shit. No obvious scummy pms, natural.


Nothing like your house, controversy everywhere.

On August 08 2013 21:12 Oatsmaster wrote:
On August 08 2013 21:06 Xatalos wrote:
Oats, why do you have a scumread on Koshi again? Because this post before claiming him as scum doesn't really explain it:

On August 08 2013 19:47 Oatsmaster wrote:
Oats, we just played in Titanic and you come in this thread and say that you know that everybody in your house is town and that you will protect their identity? You must be really REALLY confident in this game.
You prevent us to find scum in your house and you prevent your house by talking about how you got elected or prevent them from giving away information about you.

Um what? My reads were mostly right in Titanic. 1 wrong read. whatever.

I only prevent you from knowing who I can contact through pms.
All this other stuff is really weird. I didnt get elected.


koshi didnt explain why dandel's actions was scum, when all the things he said seem to be townie to me, like agressive and shit. Killing kush was probably a joke, dunno.
Also, he didnt explain why im scum. This whole statement is bullshit.
You prevent us to find scum in your house and you prevent your house by talking about how you got elected or prevent them from giving away information about you.

Its not what Im doing at all. And its really weird that this is the conclusion that he drew from my statements so far.

1) Oats townreads are either "nice and shit" or "agressive and shit".
2) Oats does not realise that this game is 6 pages long instead of 20.
3) Oats calls me scum if I point out he is shitting up the thread.
4) Oats does not answer me when I ask him who should be lord in our house in theory, but then wants me to explain to him why I find DI scummy over S0lstice.

Here is my first real scumread.


This is not concise reasoning for Oats being scum, The first two don't seem relevant, and I'm not sure that he's calling you scum just for 3).
4 is him being an ass to you, isn't necessarily alignment indicative.

Do you really think he's scum for those reasons? To me it looks like you're angry at him and calling him scum for that. If you think he's scum then I want to see a clear line of thought in reaching that conclusion.

I would like to see any reasons you have for your scumreads to be presented in a concise case with no waffle, especially with material from the thread that's available to everyone. I'm not willing to take anything you and Dandel say regarding lies and inconsistencies during the night at face value until there are members of your house to present their version of events between you two.

I am not angry at Oats, he is however trying really hard to do so. Why are the first 2 not relevant? Oats is actually capable to make cases, so him just commenting on his townreads like that is bad play or scumplay. Why would he call me scum if I am right about him shitting up the thread? Doesn't he see that he is doing it? Instead he keeps doing these things like asking me questions that are so wrong that I just have to respond to them.

What's the difference between a lurker/inactive and Oats at this point?


Do you want to lynch Oats cause he's a lurker?
What do you think of his exchange with yammo?

I want to lynch Oats because he is clearly not playing like he should/can play. I don't understand why he is considered town in this game while he is at best a lurker.
Yamato was right, Oats was wrong. Yamato had to endure Oats his terrible questions just like me.
But Yamato is fitting the same profile as Oats at this point, however, people think Oats is town and Yamato is scum. Why is that? They interacted with each other in the first 6 hours of this game and then disappeared.

But I don't want to live in the past alone.
I want to add that in my eyes s0lstice is town and I do not see a reason why he is scum except for not picking DI. The only small thing that is strange is that he ran so convincingly for Lord and is now being pretty afk.
DI seems to be town as well. I was not aware of his town meta and I thought that DI trolling meant DI=scum. Him wanting to be Lord to kill Kush = Trolling.

I don't have scumreads yet on any of the big posters in this game and killing of people that don't participate in the game is probably a good idea. Clarity is a bit on my radar but that is based on associations and being a vassal of iamp but that's it.


I have no idea what the bolded means.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 17:45 GMT
#1261
On August 10 2013 02:41 Oatsmaster wrote:
Why are you posting that more than 48 hours until we have to vote Oberyn?
Seems like useless fluff to me.


Pretty sure we vote for lord during n1, OP states every night.
Btw the OP also states lords are lords for the following day AND nightcycle. Who was it that said lords cant pm eachother during the night?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 18:03 GMT
#1286
Dandel what's the difference between a jkirby lynch and a lurker lynch at this point?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 19:51 GMT
#1373
On August 10 2013 04:44 Risen wrote:
Just to note, oats was at the top of my scum list earlier. You're far from the only one. Clarity has become even more scummy to me as he has posted more.


Would you like to expand upon this?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 21:00 GMT
#1430
On August 10 2013 05:54 Acrofales wrote:
A pressing matter has arisen in the Reach. I must return there post-haste. I should be back in time for the formal vote, but if I am not, please record that I want to lynch jrkirby, whose few contributions do not seem compatible with loyalty to the realm. I should be back in plenty of time, so feel free to continue sending me ravens.

Remember my earlier speech. Please make sure to decide on a list of priorities for sending our swords after tonight, and each lord should publicize when he will send his swords in order to use them optimally.

I will be around for another 15 minutes or so, while my servants saddle my horse.

##vote jrkirby


I still don't really understand. He came into the thread late and talked about setup, classic newbie mistake for either alignment.
What are the other points against him? How is this different from a lurker lynch?

Also, is anyone other than rayn willing to lynch Onegu right now?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 21:04 GMT
#1437
On August 10 2013 06:02 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 06:00 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 10 2013 05:54 Acrofales wrote:
A pressing matter has arisen in the Reach. I must return there post-haste. I should be back in time for the formal vote, but if I am not, please record that I want to lynch jrkirby, whose few contributions do not seem compatible with loyalty to the realm. I should be back in plenty of time, so feel free to continue sending me ravens.

Remember my earlier speech. Please make sure to decide on a list of priorities for sending our swords after tonight, and each lord should publicize when he will send his swords in order to use them optimally.

I will be around for another 15 minutes or so, while my servants saddle my horse.

##vote jrkirby


I still don't really understand. He came into the thread late and talked about setup, classic newbie mistake for either alignment.
What are the other points against him? How is this different from a lurker lynch?

Also, is anyone other than rayn willing to lynch Onegu right now?

He's a lurker who has contributed NOTHING, nor given any intention of contributing anything. Why do you think he's a loyalist? Who would you prefer we kill today?

My horse is ready. Adieu!


Did I say he's a loyalist? He's basically a lurker lynch. Didn't we all agree we have KP for that?
It's a policy lynch, coinflip. What information do we gain if he flips town?

I like an onegu lynch.

Risen are you ever going to explain your scumread on me? Apparantly I'm your main lynch candidate.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 21:36 GMT
#1462
Risen I'm getting kinda tired of asking you to actually explain why you want to lynch me.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 21:54 GMT
#1470
On August 10 2013 06:52 jrkirby wrote:
Also, Onegu is probably the biggest reason why we elected Oberyn, so if one of them is scum, there's a decent chance the other is scum too.


Could you explain this please?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 09 2013 22:00 GMT
#1473
On August 10 2013 06:58 jrkirby wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 06:54 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 10 2013 06:52 jrkirby wrote:
Also, Onegu is probably the biggest reason why we elected Oberyn, so if one of them is scum, there's a decent chance the other is scum too.


Could you explain this please?


The first PM I got from onegu was that we should elect oberyn because he was experienced. I PM'd Oberyn a bunch before deciding to elect oberyn, but the campaign kinda started with onegu. Without the association though, this isn't inherently scummy in my opinion.


Why can't one be town and the other be scum.
Surely a townie can advocate electing scum? It's even possible for insecure scum to immediately elect a townie.

You said if one is scum so is the other, why?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 10 2013 21:58 GMT
#1634
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 07:55 GMT
#1705
Hey guys I was roleblocked. Catching up now.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 08:10 GMT
#1706
Alright so grack just put info in the thread recklessly. At least we can talk about it now.
Everyone in that house seems to have 7 hp, iamp revealed the hp check result to his house before night was over.
Then gumshoe died in the nightpost.

House kp is likely 1. The people of that house's hp was likely 7.
One of scum heard about gumshoe having 1 hp and finished him off, and put their other kp somewhere else, which was either blocked or not enough to kill.

Logical conclusion, at least one person in this house is scum:
iamperfection
Xatalos
Grackaroni

Scum had no reason to target gumshoe otherwise. (although even with him having 1 hp, they had no real reason to kill him if they thought their kp couldn't kill a second person, making it more likely the other kp got blocked?)

I'm interested, could anyone in house Lannister tell us who gumshoe was voting for? iamp as well?
Did he show suspicion of anyone in pms?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 08:23 GMT
#1710
Also this:
On August 11 2013 14:08 Chromatically wrote:
And how did Risen get elected?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 08:28 GMT
#1711
My conclusion might be wrong btw. If one of the lords is scum and was aware of the plan... But it makes more sense if the leak is from house lannister because they knew exactly how much hp gumshoe had left.
Surely scum would just let town kill a lurker town if they weren't sure how much kp they'd have to use.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 08:40 GMT
#1716
On August 11 2013 17:33 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2013 17:10 Clarity_nl wrote:
Alright so grack just put info in the thread recklessly. At least we can talk about it now.
Everyone in that house seems to have 7 hp, iamp revealed the hp check result to his house before night was over.
Then gumshoe died in the nightpost.

House kp is likely 1. The people of that house's hp was likely 7.
One of scum heard about gumshoe having 1 hp and finished him off, and put their other kp somewhere else, which was either blocked or not enough to kill.

Logical conclusion, at least one person in this house is scum:
iamperfection
Xatalos
Grackaroni

Scum had no reason to target gumshoe otherwise. (although even with him having 1 hp, they had no real reason to kill him if they thought their kp couldn't kill a second person, making it more likely the other kp got blocked?)

I'm interested, could anyone in house Lannister tell us who gumshoe was voting for? iamp as well?
Did he show suspicion of anyone in pms?

Gumshoe has not pm'd anybody all night and did nothing since n0 besides the last minute unnecessary vote in thread to avoid mod-kill. I don't think he sent a lord vote.
Every lord KP was aimed at Gumshoe. The second one lord revealed that in the thread people would not leave him for house kp shots a 2nd night, he would become the automatic lynch target and it would be a lynch and a days worth of discussion gone.

In a setup with 24 players I would assume there is enough kp in scum hands to be able to kill at least 2 players per night.
Logical Conclusion, No person in this house is scum :
iamperfection
Xatalos
Grackaroni

Scum should have been able to have killed a townie besides gumshoe otherwise and must have spread their kp too thin trying for more kill because they were unaware of how much hp a townie had.


What the fuck. You actually believe this?
Explain why scum would kill gumshoe, with what reasoning.

You think that scum didn't know how much hp a townie had (and therefore lannisters are clean) because they killed gumshoe and no one else? You're telling me you think they focused all their kp on GUMSHOE?!?!?!?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 08:52 GMT
#1721
On August 11 2013 17:48 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2013 17:40 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 11 2013 17:33 Grackaroni wrote:
On August 11 2013 17:10 Clarity_nl wrote:
Alright so grack just put info in the thread recklessly. At least we can talk about it now.
Everyone in that house seems to have 7 hp, iamp revealed the hp check result to his house before night was over.
Then gumshoe died in the nightpost.

House kp is likely 1. The people of that house's hp was likely 7.
One of scum heard about gumshoe having 1 hp and finished him off, and put their other kp somewhere else, which was either blocked or not enough to kill.

Logical conclusion, at least one person in this house is scum:
iamperfection
Xatalos
Grackaroni

Scum had no reason to target gumshoe otherwise. (although even with him having 1 hp, they had no real reason to kill him if they thought their kp couldn't kill a second person, making it more likely the other kp got blocked?)

I'm interested, could anyone in house Lannister tell us who gumshoe was voting for? iamp as well?
Did he show suspicion of anyone in pms?

Gumshoe has not pm'd anybody all night and did nothing since n0 besides the last minute unnecessary vote in thread to avoid mod-kill. I don't think he sent a lord vote.
Every lord KP was aimed at Gumshoe. The second one lord revealed that in the thread people would not leave him for house kp shots a 2nd night, he would become the automatic lynch target and it would be a lynch and a days worth of discussion gone.

In a setup with 24 players I would assume there is enough kp in scum hands to be able to kill at least 2 players per night.
Logical Conclusion, No person in this house is scum :
iamperfection
Xatalos
Grackaroni

Scum should have been able to have killed a townie besides gumshoe otherwise and must have spread their kp too thin trying for more kill because they were unaware of how much hp a townie had.


What the fuck. You actually believe this?
Explain why scum would kill gumshoe, with what reasoning.

You think that scum didn't know how much hp a townie had (and therefore lannisters are clean) because they killed gumshoe and no one else? You're telling me you think they focused all their kp on GUMSHOE?!?!?!?

I believe that there are townies besides lords with kp, one of them shot gumshoe because his only contributions to the thread were these 2 posts :
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 11:19 gumshoe wrote:
Hey, I'm alive, been busy, ill vote tofu as well.

Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 11:20 gumshoe wrote:
## vote tofu

Why do you automatically assume it was mafia that killed him? From my POV I know that I'm town, and xatalos and iamperfection have both been very pro-town in thread. So my explanation is much more logical to me.


Because he died in the nightpost. Unless you think a townrole vigi'd gumshoe after being aware that the lords were going to kp gumshoe? If I were a townrole with kp I'd ask my lord who they were gonna kp. If I were a lord AND a blue with kp I wouldn't waste my role on killing the guy who just took 6 houses (this is an assumption) worth of kp.

I agree that iamp and xata have looked town, but please explain a scenario where all of you are town.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 09:09 GMT
#1723
Because he's 1 hp and if one of you is scum it makes it easier to elect yourself? Because he might be blue? (less likely)
Like I said, I dunno where the rest of scum's kp went, but it either got blocked or they spread it out to kill 4 people n2 or whatever.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 09:29 GMT
#1730
Do you think it's more likely that scum targeted gumshoe without knowing his hp?
Or is it more likely that scum realized gumshoe had 1 hp so they just used 1kp out of like the (random guess) 12-20 they have?

If you're scum and you become aware of someone who's not scum being killable with hardly any downside, why not kill him.
Especially since you're in his house, meaning you only have to convince one person to make you lord now, instead of two.
He could be replaced, he could be a blue. No reason to overthink it.

The rest of scum kp could have easily hit a high hp townie or been blocked. There's 0 reason to think they would stack kp on gumshoe.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 09:47 GMT
#1742
On August 11 2013 18:46 Dandel Ion wrote:
Why is it assumed scum can split their kp in the first place?


Pretty decent assumption in this large a game, no?
I also think it's pretty standard in hp games?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 10:11 GMT
#1757
On August 11 2013 19:01 Xatalos wrote:
Clarity, I think grackaroni is town atm. He's also making sense in this discussion. He wouldn't be made Lord if gumshoe died. gumshoe was also playing for scum, even if he was town, so why would scum use their KP and not let him just hinder town (probably a mislynch or at least wasted KP)? Even if he was blue, which was unlikely, he would still almost certainly be of advantage to scum. I would never kill gumshoe as scum, especially if it meant putting myself at risk (like in grackaroni's case).


That's the thing I never called him scum. I called you and iamp likely town though.
Anyway, killing him as scum makes more sense if one of you three is scum. I'm done WIFOMing though.
If later on in the game there's still no town claim for shooting gumshoe or a flip that suggests town might have shot him, then I want to revisit this.

On August 11 2013 19:05 Oatsmaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2013 18:57 Ace wrote:
Oats you're going to have to go into detail and show why. So far I have seen nothing that suggests every house has to have Scum. If there is something that I don't know about point it out.

DI where were you confirmed Town? And um yea, understanding your thought process is a pretty big deal.

Why using setup speculation to defend yourself is bad?
Come on Ace.


He was being attacked with setup speculation... how else is he supposed to defend himself at this point?
He was called scum because of the assumption that his house MUST have a scum, so he explains that we don't know if all houses have scum.

This isn't difficult. Let's just let ace catch up and get some reads, yes?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 11:20 GMT
#1771
Anyway...

let me just put it in one post to make it easier.

xata claims roleblocked
oberyn claims watcher and says he targeted xata, 2 visitors. He hasn't told us who, though.
onegu claims 1 shot medic on xata

Easy conclusion: xata lied about the roleblock or onegu is lying about the 1shot medic or the 2nd person who targeted xata is the roleblocker.

xata looks pretty town, no reason for him to lie and no reason for a town roleblocker to target him
Therefore either Onegu or the second person is scum

With how quickly onegu claimed 1shot medic I doubt he's scum trying to get a townie lynched before he dies.
Therefore whoever is left is scum. Oberyn if you did not fakeclaim you should just tell us who it is so we can lynch him
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 11:32 GMT
#1775
One possible problem.

If the person is town he is likely a protective role, if the person is scum he will likely claim a protective role.
If we lynch this person and he flips town we can't immediately lynch onegu for this.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 11:38 GMT
#1778
On August 11 2013 20:37 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2013 20:32 Clarity_nl wrote:
One possible problem.

If the person is town he is likely a protective role, if the person is scum he will likely claim a protective role.
If we lynch this person and he flips town we can't immediately lynch onegu for this.


The fact is that I was roleblocked. Why would I lie about that? So

1) Oberyn is lying (scum)
2) Onegu is lying (scum)
3) X is lying (scum)

If X flips town, we absolutely need to lynch Onegu or Oberyn.


That's what I mean.

Both people on you could theoretically be town.

Onegu's claim seems really natural, so I think he's town. Oberyn seems town.
If X flips town I don't think we can lynch onegu/oberyn on just this watcher claim
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 11:45 GMT
#1779
nvm yeah I'm an idiot. One of onegu or X roleblocked you.
I guess jailer is a possibility but unlikely.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 11:51 GMT
#1782
Yeah one of them is scum. Town wouldn't roleblock you. I just derped on the roleblock part.
The only explanation where all are town is a town jailer. Very unlikely and if player X is anyone even remotely scummy we need to lynch them
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 12:26 GMT
#1786
What does waiting for the person to claim accomplish exactly? Surely the only possible claim as either alignment is jailkeeper?

If there is a town roleblocker it's more likely he targeted me, than xata.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 12:41 GMT
#1789
On August 11 2013 21:40 Acrofales wrote:
First things first. I haven't read the minutes for the start of today's meeting yet, but I received some important information that I was asked to pass on to the other lords. It seems it is actually pertinent to everybody here. One of my vassals has a network of little birds, who have uncovered that Yamato is a Blackfyre pretender. I trust him and I trust his abilities.

##vote Yamato


Could we have... details about these little birds?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 12:42 GMT
#1790
Like, could you stop roleplaying and just say "red check" if that's the case?
Let me sum up the 5 pages of d2:
On August 11 2013 20:20 Clarity_nl wrote:
Anyway...

let me just put it in one post to make it easier.

xata claims roleblocked
oberyn claims watcher and says he targeted xata, 2 visitors. He hasn't told us who, though.
onegu claims 1 shot medic on xata

Easy conclusion: xata lied about the roleblock or onegu is lying about the 1shot medic or the 2nd person who targeted xata is the roleblocker.

xata looks pretty town, no reason for him to lie and no reason for a town roleblocker to target him
Therefore either Onegu or the second person is scum

With how quickly onegu claimed 1shot medic I doubt he's scum trying to get a townie lynched before he dies.
Therefore whoever is left is scum. Oberyn if you did not fakeclaim you should just tell us who it is so we can lynch him

FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 12:48 GMT
#1793
So why does Acro hide the identity, and oats just reveals it in thread.
Oats, to answer your question, to protect the cop, perhaps?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 13:00 GMT
#1797
My head hurts. I don't understand what you guys are doing.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 13:45 GMT
#1820
On August 11 2013 22:22 Oberyn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2013 22:21 Oatsmaster wrote:
On August 11 2013 22:20 Oberyn wrote:
On August 11 2013 22:18 Oatsmaster wrote:
What happens if
A: Its a fakecheck.
B: Yamato is a miller
C: Yamato was framed.
Hm Xata?


So is that what you think oats?

yes


But wasn't yamato one of your scum reads prior?


Oats has been rather persistent in calling yamato town in pms.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 13:47 GMT
#1821
On August 11 2013 22:33 Sharrant wrote:
Well, I wasn't quite expecting to be revealed so quickly.

I claimed my role to Acro last night (I'm a one shot alignment cop). I asked him who I should target with it, he said Kush and Yamato. Both players I had in mind originally. In case he was mafia I lied and said I would target Kush.

After I brought up framing he suggested that Kush might be too high profile, and that I should check Koshi or Ace. I think both of those are fairly legitimate suggestions. It seems less likely that Acro is mafia because he was suggesting more people to check that are in positions where a check would be very good.

An alternative is that Acro is mafia, and they have no framer like role, so he wanted to push me off a mafia Kush, but I find this unlikely.

At the end of the day you're left with a red check on Yamato, someone relatively out of the spotlight and not a likely choice for framers. And as I stated, his argumentative nature in this game is quite different from how it is when he's arguing as a town member.


I like this.

I'll go with this. I also want to share that while oats has been really eager to convince me yamato is town, vivax has been really eager to convince me he's scum.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 13:49 GMT
#1822
On August 11 2013 22:37 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2013 22:32 Oatsmaster wrote:
On August 11 2013 22:31 Onegu wrote:
I have been talking with yamato and some of his stances and thoughts on oberyn made me have a townie feeling on him. He said he was going to post a case on Acro but hasnt done it yet though.

How do you talk with yamato?

I may be forced to use the too dumb to be Blackfyre line. Are you drunk?

While we're on the topic, how the flying fuck did the Starks think it was a good idea to elect you? I understand not electing Strongandbig again, but you are far from an improvement. Please explain the politics of Winterfell.


I can. Vivax voted snb and went away 12 hours before deadline.
Oats did not want to vote me, snb did not want to vote himself (he said he's be less active today)
From my perspective it was oats as lord or no lord.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 14:26 GMT
#1829
On August 11 2013 23:11 Ace wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2013 22:37 Acrofales wrote:
On August 11 2013 22:32 Oatsmaster wrote:
On August 11 2013 22:31 Onegu wrote:
I have been talking with yamato and some of his stances and thoughts on oberyn made me have a townie feeling on him. He said he was going to post a case on Acro but hasnt done it yet though.

How do you talk with yamato?

I may be forced to use the too dumb to be Blackfyre line. Are you drunk?

While we're on the topic, how the flying fuck did the Starks think it was a good idea to elect you? I understand not electing Strongandbig again, but you are far from an improvement. Please explain the politics of Winterfell.


read his earlier conversations with me. Poor Starks, always have shit leaders.


Ace rather than flinging shit with oats which doesn't do anyone any good, have you caught up and if so could you... you know, do things?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 14:45 GMT
#1836
So why aren't the lords that are around voting yamato yet?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 15:11 GMT
#1842
On August 12 2013 00:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:
wtf is with you guys? Why did you discuss the watcher situation?


You'd rather we didn't discuss it?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 15:13 GMT
#1844
On August 12 2013 00:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yes i would. You basically gave the only possible fakeclaim to mafia in case X is scum.


People aren't dumb
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 15:23 GMT
#1851
On August 12 2013 00:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 00:13 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 12 2013 00:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yes i would. You basically gave the only possible fakeclaim to mafia in case X is scum.


People aren't dumb

1) Yes, people are dumb
2) Even if they weren´t there is no reason to tell anyone what answers you are going to accept before they answer..


Unless you're gonna come to some kind of conclusion that me or xata is scum I don't see a reason for you to once again produce a page of uselessness.

Information became available, information got analyzed, conclusions were drawn. Every person does this.
You think if X player is scum he's gonna come into the thread and say "yeah I'm town roleblocker I thought xata was scum"?
People aren't THAT dumb.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 16:47 GMT
#1884
On August 12 2013 01:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What was the point of outing the result of the HP check to everyone?


What is the point of asking dumb questions. He got told it was dumb and he said "yeah it was, my bad"
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 17:34 GMT
#1917
On August 12 2013 02:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 02:16 iamperfection wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:08 iamperfection wrote:
Like what's the point to this rayne I don't get it?

The point is i would expect some cooperation in houses. Your house doesn't seem to cooperate and i would like to know why?

So the fact that I didn't give them a book of how to play mafia for dummies means we don't cooperate? I asked them their thoughts on what to do and quite frankly I was going to do what I thought was best.

Okay now we are getting somewhere. Why do you think Grackaroni outed the check result if you specifically asked his thoughts on what to do?


Please rayn, I beg you, stop. Here, let me help you and quote the relevant posts.

On August 11 2013 14:24 Grackaroni wrote:
We used our check on our own house before the end of the night and Me/Iamp/Xatalos all had 7 hp. Gumshoe had 1, so every lord did shoot him but why wouldn't they since he was town...

On August 11 2013 14:27 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2013 14:26 Onegu wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:24 Grackaroni wrote:
We used our check on our own house before the end of the night and Me/Iamp/Xatalos all had 7 hp. Gumshoe had 1, so every lord did shoot him but why wouldn't they since he was town...



Why are you giving this info out?

you thought it was odd so I told you what was up. Shouldn't make a difference anyway

On August 11 2013 14:32 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2013 14:29 Onegu wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:27 Grackaroni wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:26 Onegu wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:24 Grackaroni wrote:
We used our check on our own house before the end of the night and Me/Iamp/Xatalos all had 7 hp. Gumshoe had 1, so every lord did shoot him but why wouldn't they since he was town...



Why are you giving this info out?

you thought it was odd so I told you what was up. Shouldn't make a difference anyway



Yeah letting scum know exactly how many KP to use doesnt make a a difference

you're right that was stupid.


Thanks for wasting 10 posts on this subject though. DRAW A CONCLUSION OR STFU
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 17:38 GMT
#1920
On August 12 2013 02:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 02:34 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:16 iamperfection wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:08 iamperfection wrote:
Like what's the point to this rayne I don't get it?

The point is i would expect some cooperation in houses. Your house doesn't seem to cooperate and i would like to know why?

So the fact that I didn't give them a book of how to play mafia for dummies means we don't cooperate? I asked them their thoughts on what to do and quite frankly I was going to do what I thought was best.

Okay now we are getting somewhere. Why do you think Grackaroni outed the check result if you specifically asked his thoughts on what to do?


Please rayn, I beg you, stop. Here, let me help you and quote the relevant posts.

On August 11 2013 14:24 Grackaroni wrote:
We used our check on our own house before the end of the night and Me/Iamp/Xatalos all had 7 hp. Gumshoe had 1, so every lord did shoot him but why wouldn't they since he was town...

On August 11 2013 14:27 Grackaroni wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:26 Onegu wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:24 Grackaroni wrote:
We used our check on our own house before the end of the night and Me/Iamp/Xatalos all had 7 hp. Gumshoe had 1, so every lord did shoot him but why wouldn't they since he was town...



Why are you giving this info out?

you thought it was odd so I told you what was up. Shouldn't make a difference anyway

On August 11 2013 14:32 Grackaroni wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:29 Onegu wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:27 Grackaroni wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:26 Onegu wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:24 Grackaroni wrote:
We used our check on our own house before the end of the night and Me/Iamp/Xatalos all had 7 hp. Gumshoe had 1, so every lord did shoot him but why wouldn't they since he was town...



Why are you giving this info out?

you thought it was odd so I told you what was up. Shouldn't make a difference anyway



Yeah letting scum know exactly how many KP to use doesnt make a a difference

you're right that was stupid.


Thanks for wasting 10 posts on this subject though. DRAW A CONCLUSION OR STFU

Here is your conclusion. iamperfection and Grackaroni are doing incredibly stupid stuff if they are town.
They are not working together in their house.
When they are being called out from their stupid stuff they say "my bad, it was dumb".

WHY THE FUCK DO TOWNIES DO STUPID STUFF WITHOUT THINKING FOR 5 MINUTES?
Right, for no reason..


Which is worse. A townie doing something stupid, acknowledging it and moving on.
Or the townie who shits up 3 pages talking about the mistake and how he cant believe that THIS TOWNIE DID SOMETHING DUMB.
Unless you think it makes him scum, stop talking about it. If you think it makes him scum, explain why.

Just stop with the fucking questions that lead nowhere. What the fuck do you expect iamp to answer that'll help town in any way??
"Oh yeah I forgot I told him not to say it in thread, sorry, yeah you're right he's scum"
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 17:40 GMT
#1924
On August 12 2013 02:39 Acrofales wrote:
EBWOP: jesus christ = By the seven!


Roleplayslip, lynch!
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 17:53 GMT
#1935
On August 12 2013 02:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:
EBWOP: And after all this ridiculous stuff people are just letting this kinda stuff slip by because the guys said "my bad, it was stupid".

wtf is up with you? How are you going to find mafia if every scummy thing is gonna be brushed away by sinply saying "my bad, i was dumb"?


Because dumb does not equal scummy. If I point out something that is scummy scum can't say "yeah that was scummy my bad". If someone does something dumb and it gets pointed out they can say "yeah that was dumb my bad"

You're also wrong, because strange things already happened with the kp. Gumshoe was at 1 hp from house kp and died in the nightpost.
I stand by the fact that this means one of the lannisters is scum.

The question is, do you think he's scum? If your answer is no then my follow-up question is what the fuck are you doing?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 18:00 GMT
#1941
On August 12 2013 02:55 iamperfection wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 02:53 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:
EBWOP: And after all this ridiculous stuff people are just letting this kinda stuff slip by because the guys said "my bad, it was stupid".

wtf is up with you? How are you going to find mafia if every scummy thing is gonna be brushed away by sinply saying "my bad, i was dumb"?


Because dumb does not equal scummy. If I point out something that is scummy scum can't say "yeah that was scummy my bad". If someone does something dumb and it gets pointed out they can say "yeah that was dumb my bad"

You're also wrong, because strange things already happened with the kp. Gumshoe was at 1 hp from house kp and died in the nightpost.
I stand by the fact that this means one of the lannisters is scum.

The question is, do you think he's scum? If your answer is no then my follow-up question is what the fuck are you doing?

no the likeliest conclusion is that gum was shot by a town vig at the end of the night when he was still alive.


Maybe from your perspective, if you are town (which I think is likely) that makes sense.
As I've said I'm not going to pursue this until way later in the game if there's been no claim for the shot or no flip that suggests it could be a town shot.

However rayn is being dumb and it's annoying because it's exactly the way rayn started playing in titanic, which held up to its namesake.

iamp why is your vote not on yamato yet?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 18:07 GMT
#1943
On August 12 2013 03:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What is your conclusion Clarity? Do you think someone in that house is mafia? Why / why not?


Read the thread. I've been over this. Extensively.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 18:12 GMT
#1948
On August 12 2013 03:08 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 03:07 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 12 2013 03:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What is your conclusion Clarity? Do you think someone in that house is mafia? Why / why not?


Read the thread. I've been over this. Extensively.

Yeah you have said you think at least one of those guys are mafia. Now you are brushing this under the carpet. Why? Why don´t you want to figure out which one of those 3 is mafia?


If gumshoe died at the hands of scum then one of those 3 is scum. If not, then not.
Right now we have no way of knowing, and iamp + xata have been pro-town regardless of their alignment (which is likely town)
If there is a scum it is likely grack, but he is not a good lynch until like 2 daycycles from now because of the cop check and the watcher check.

No real point talking about it now. I already talked about it.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 18:26 GMT
#1960
On August 12 2013 03:23 kushm4sta wrote:
honestly im waiting for more people to die before I get into this game.
acro is my only scumread right now.
1- rolefishing?
he pmed me this
Show nested quote +
Are you Oberyn's Mr. X? If so, do you need me to pass on a message?

no idea what this even means lol


This is pretty bad actually Acro. Can you confirm you asked him this and please explain why.
I'd also like to know if you asked anyone else.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 18:30 GMT
#1966
On August 12 2013 03:28 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 03:26 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 12 2013 03:23 kushm4sta wrote:
honestly im waiting for more people to die before I get into this game.
acro is my only scumread right now.
1- rolefishing?
he pmed me this
Are you Oberyn's Mr. X? If so, do you need me to pass on a message?

no idea what this even means lol


This is pretty bad actually Acro. Can you confirm you asked him this and please explain why.
I'd also like to know if you asked anyone else.

Explain to me how this is bad and I will tell you.


If you are town, why ask anyone specifically to tell YOU if they're a blue role?
Do you think that if kush, as a blue role, would be incapable of telling us he visited xata?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 18:34 GMT
#1973
Yamato it's cool that you're scum but enough with the pictures, standard tl rules still apply.

On August 12 2013 03:33 Oatsmaster wrote:
yamato, why the fuck are you not taking this game seriously?


He's claimed scum.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 18:51 GMT
#1982
On August 12 2013 03:46 Koshi wrote:
I am back. I had soccer and couldn't post till now. I tried to make posts on my phone but it kept saying "Bad Request". I don't know how to fix it. I tried closing my browser, shutting down phone, reconnecting to the internet. Nothing.

Only Gumshoe dieing is strange. I can't believe scum hitted him when they knew Lords were going to kill him. This leaves 2 options: Scum knew gum had only 1 hp left or there is an SK that wanted to hide in that kill (I tried that in Sicilian). If the first is true than there is a mole in the Lanister House. iamp saying that it is a vigi is just ridiculous, why would a vigi waste a shot on a target that is going to die anyway? I don't think grack+iamp is scum though, because if they were they should just have kept their mouths shut, and just kill one of their members to keep their House under control and nobody would even find out about the HP check.

Mr.X seems like a trustworthy person for Oberyn, otherwise I see no reason why Oberyn hasn't said his name yet. It's a bit unlucky that both Onegu and Mr.X visited Xatalos, otherwise people not dieing could be seen as a successful safe on Xatalos instead of one of the visitors must be scum.

Yamato red check is quite damning and should be enough evidence to get him lynched today. Yamato being either miller or being framed is unlikely. If this is the case then this is bad luck. Not lynching yamato is bad play.


Why is this unlucky?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 19:03 GMT
#1990
Oats was trying to convince me yamato was town and vivax was trying to convince me yamato was scum.
I think both oats and vivax are town. Is that weird?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 20:11 GMT
#2017
On August 12 2013 05:08 Dandel Ion wrote:
I think factional KP is probably not sent by anybody.
It's like, magic and shit. zoom.

I bet the scumteam is all "I b a wizzzard" all the time
too bad they didn't manage to kill anybody.


I asked about this earlier and the answer is: we don't know if it's factional or not.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 20:12 GMT
#2019
So... wasn't ace supposed to like catch up and be useful or something?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 20:13 GMT
#2020
#wavelength
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 20:24 GMT
#2022
On August 12 2013 05:13 Dandel Ion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 05:11 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 12 2013 05:08 Dandel Ion wrote:
I think factional KP is probably not sent by anybody.
It's like, magic and shit. zoom.

I bet the scumteam is all "I b a wizzzard" all the time
too bad they didn't manage to kill anybody.


I asked about this earlier and the answer is: we don't know if it's factional or not.

it was factional in Needlessly Big Game too, and that's the only HP game I remember happening.
QED


You sure showed me
Could one of the lords tell us if Risen has been active in pms?

Also, chromatticaly has been posting consistently this game, so why don't I remember anything about him.
Just read his filter and while glancing it looks townie, if I go through his filter and note all the reads he has the list is rather short.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 20:41 GMT
#2029
He seemed pretty town n0, and has done nothing since.

Dunno what to tell you, I wanna trust my initial impression of him.... He did the pressure on me and then backed off when he still thought I might be scum telling me "I'd rather just see how you do and there's no much more to say"
If he were scum he could've easily kept tunneling me...

But yeah, he hasn't done anything d1 or n1. He claimed during n1 that he wasn't gonna be active this daycycle but would run for lord again n2. Saying that he (paraphrasing) "wants to re-earn the obv-towniness he showed n0"

He could definitely be scum but we've got other stuff to do like kill scum-confirmed yamato and then figure out whatsup with this tracker stuff. By then we should know if he's scum. In sicilian he showed his true colours in time (ignoring the vigi shot)
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 20:41 GMT
#2030
For my filter, that last post was about snb.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 20:48 GMT
#2033
Yamato is it possible for you to stop? I'm actually getting pretty annoyed to the point that I wanna report you.
I asked you to stop earlier.

If you wanna go "LOL DUMB LOL" or whatever go ahead but quit it with the damn pictures and gifs.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 11 2013 20:52 GMT
#2035
On August 12 2013 05:50 yamato77 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 05:48 Clarity_nl wrote:
Yamato is it possible for you to stop? I'm actually getting pretty annoyed to the point that I wanna report you.
I asked you to stop earlier.

If you wanna go "LOL DUMB LOL" or whatever go ahead but quit it with the damn pictures and gifs.

If you don't appreciate my humor, you are free to just not read the thread.


What I don't appreciate is a fucking 3 second loop moving in the corner of my eye for the rest of the day.
But yes, I don't appreciate your humor either.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 07:21 GMT
#2091
On August 12 2013 12:08 Oberyn wrote:
##Vote yamato77

I haven't been around a computer all day, but I should be available most of tomorrow. The thread should be made aware that I am not a watcher and Onegu is not a 1-shot medic. It was probably a long shot, but I have received no information regarding the identity of the roleblocker. Carry on.


Kind of expected sadly. Whats with the new meta to scumclaim everything.
Oberyn do you really have a strong townread on onegu behind closed doors? I don't understand why you did this with him, instead of perhaps another lord (your house is kinda scummy except for you)

On August 12 2013 07:41 Chromatically wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 07:29 Ace wrote:

Did chromatically know about yamato being checked when he told you he would likely be lynched the next day?

I did not. He wasn't doing anything and he was under pressure for it, so I assumed he would either a) shape up and not be a good shot anyway or b) not shape up and be scum.

Also:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 05:24 Clarity_nl wrote:

Also, chromatticaly has been posting consistently this game, so why don't I remember anything about him.
Just read his filter and while glancing it looks townie, if I go through his filter and note all the reads he has the list is rather short.

If there's anything in particular you'd like to know, you can just ask. I don't want to just give out reads for no reason when we're not lynching them.


Ok so, this is pretty annoying. I gave it a rest because people are vouching for you, but why won't people share their goddamn scumreads in the thread. How are the people that aren't a lord supposed to figure stuff out when all you dorks are just talking in pms.

d5 is gonna arrive and all we're gonna have is.
Player A called player B town because of pms
Player B called player C scum because of pms

Since Player B is town, I guess player C is scum?!?!? I DONT FUCKING KNOW I HAVE NO INFO

I understand yamato is dying today so it'll be a slow day and that's fine but can we PLEASE just scumhunt in the thread?
It also puts actual pressure on the people you believe are scum since everyone in the game can watch stuff unravel.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 07:25 GMT
#2093
scumclaim = fakeclaim, tis early
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 07:25 GMT
#2094
On August 12 2013 16:23 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ace has been insanely useless guys. He's scum.
Clarity, what do you think?


I think he's been insanely useless. I think we shouldn't shoot him n2 though.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 07:32 GMT
#2097
Because at least he's showing up 1000 times saying he hasn't caught up yet.
Eventually he'll have to say he's caught up, right? Let's see what he does then.

Plus rayn said in his opening post that nmm8 seems towny.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 07:48 GMT
#2105
On August 12 2013 16:45 Oatsmaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 16:32 Clarity_nl wrote:
Because at least he's showing up 1000 times saying he hasn't caught up yet.
Eventually he'll have to say he's caught up, right? Let's see what he does then.

Plus rayn said in his opening post that nmm8 seems towny.

I totally dont agree with this.
Also I assume NMM8 didnt actually pm that much so rayn's analysis may not be that accurate.


You don't agree with giving someone a chance when getting replaced into 80 pages?
Yeah he could definitely be scum, but if he is we'll find out. Why in such a rush to house kp him when we can just see what he does today/d3 and go from there.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 07:56 GMT
#2111
On August 12 2013 16:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 16:48 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 12 2013 16:45 Oatsmaster wrote:
On August 12 2013 16:32 Clarity_nl wrote:
Because at least he's showing up 1000 times saying he hasn't caught up yet.
Eventually he'll have to say he's caught up, right? Let's see what he does then.

Plus rayn said in his opening post that nmm8 seems towny.

I totally dont agree with this.
Also I assume NMM8 didnt actually pm that much so rayn's analysis may not be that accurate.


You don't agree with giving someone a chance when getting replaced into 80 pages?
Yeah he could definitely be scum, but if he is we'll find out. Why in such a rush to house kp him when we can just see what he does today/d3 and go from there.

not after like almost 2 pages.

I wanna kill him as fast as possible cause I know he is scum now. Why bother waiting?


You know he's scum the same way you knew yamato was town?
Yeah, I'll wait. Are you afraid he might actually contribute or something? If you know he's scum surely you'll see through his lies.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 08:08 GMT
#2116
On August 12 2013 17:04 Oatsmaster wrote:
Fucking vet shield.


As if I know anything about who's a vet and who's not.
I've given you decent reasons to not kill him with lord kp and your answer is "NO, FUCKING KILL HIM HES SCUM"
Cool story bro
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 12:06 GMT
#2142
On August 12 2013 21:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 20:17 Xatalos wrote:
On August 12 2013 19:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What in Ace´s posts makes him scum?

Back to the drawing board with Oberyn & Onegu i guess.
O&O, why do you think the guy who assumably roleblocked Xatalos did not claim?


What exactly do you mean with "assumably"?

Because Oberyn and Onegu fakeclaimed. Don´t get me wrong, i think it´s likely that you were rb´d/jailed but it´s not sure.

I would like to hear what Oberyn and Onegu were trying to achieve by this? Because given 2 roleblock claims it´s reasonable to assume one of them is a jailkeeper. In case mafia roleblocked Clarity (which seems to be the case here) they would know they did not roleblock you. That would give them a good reason to lure out a jailer claim.


I don' t think that's a reasonable assumption at all. Plausible, yes. But not so overwhelmingly likely that you should assume it.
Two scum roleblockers in this large a game isn't that strange

If there is a jailer xata would be a good target, if there is a town roleblocker then it makes more sense for him to target me over xata.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 12:22 GMT
#2149
On August 12 2013 21:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 21:06 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 12 2013 21:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 20:17 Xatalos wrote:
On August 12 2013 19:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What in Ace´s posts makes him scum?

Back to the drawing board with Oberyn & Onegu i guess.
O&O, why do you think the guy who assumably roleblocked Xatalos did not claim?


What exactly do you mean with "assumably"?

Because Oberyn and Onegu fakeclaimed. Don´t get me wrong, i think it´s likely that you were rb´d/jailed but it´s not sure.

I would like to hear what Oberyn and Onegu were trying to achieve by this? Because given 2 roleblock claims it´s reasonable to assume one of them is a jailkeeper. In case mafia roleblocked Clarity (which seems to be the case here) they would know they did not roleblock you. That would give them a good reason to lure out a jailer claim.


I don' t think that's a reasonable assumption at all. Plausible, yes. But not so overwhelmingly likely that you should assume it.
Two scum roleblockers in this large a game isn't that strange

If there is a jailer xata would be a good target, if there is a town roleblocker then it makes more sense for him to target me over xata.

What Oberyn & Onegu did would be a good scum strategy aswell. The strange thing here is that noone claimed the roleblock on Xata. In any case (assuming O&O are town) that player kinda has to assume they are telling the truth (especially if that player is mafia), and basically HAS to claim JK. Assume you are mafia roleblocker and rb´d Xata. Two townies claim, do you assume the watcher has your name or would you take your chances with not claiming?


Assume you are town jailkeeper, why do you not claim?
You're using logic that works both ways and are applying it to only one side.

Could one of onegu/oberyn be scum? yeah. Could both be? I'm pretty sure not so much.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 12:28 GMT
#2154
On August 12 2013 21:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 21:22 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 12 2013 21:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 21:06 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 12 2013 21:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 20:17 Xatalos wrote:
On August 12 2013 19:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What in Ace´s posts makes him scum?

Back to the drawing board with Oberyn & Onegu i guess.
O&O, why do you think the guy who assumably roleblocked Xatalos did not claim?


What exactly do you mean with "assumably"?

Because Oberyn and Onegu fakeclaimed. Don´t get me wrong, i think it´s likely that you were rb´d/jailed but it´s not sure.

I would like to hear what Oberyn and Onegu were trying to achieve by this? Because given 2 roleblock claims it´s reasonable to assume one of them is a jailkeeper. In case mafia roleblocked Clarity (which seems to be the case here) they would know they did not roleblock you. That would give them a good reason to lure out a jailer claim.


I don' t think that's a reasonable assumption at all. Plausible, yes. But not so overwhelmingly likely that you should assume it.
Two scum roleblockers in this large a game isn't that strange

If there is a jailer xata would be a good target, if there is a town roleblocker then it makes more sense for him to target me over xata.

What Oberyn & Onegu did would be a good scum strategy aswell. The strange thing here is that noone claimed the roleblock on Xata. In any case (assuming O&O are town) that player kinda has to assume they are telling the truth (especially if that player is mafia), and basically HAS to claim JK. Assume you are mafia roleblocker and rb´d Xata. Two townies claim, do you assume the watcher has your name or would you take your chances with not claiming?


Assume you are town jailkeeper, why do you not claim?
You're using logic that works both ways and are applying it to only one side.

Could one of onegu/oberyn be scum? yeah. Could both be? I'm pretty sure not so much.

That´s the point. If i was town JK i would claim. If i was scum RB´r i would claim.
Unless i know the cake is a lie.


I considered oberyn's claim to be a possible fakeclaim. I thought Onegu's claim was real though. If I am scum I just hope it's a fakeclaim because if I claim jailkeeper in thread I'm getting lynched regardless.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 12:32 GMT
#2160
On August 12 2013 21:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 21:28 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 12 2013 21:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 21:22 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 12 2013 21:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 21:06 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 12 2013 21:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 20:17 Xatalos wrote:
On August 12 2013 19:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What in Ace´s posts makes him scum?

Back to the drawing board with Oberyn & Onegu i guess.
O&O, why do you think the guy who assumably roleblocked Xatalos did not claim?


What exactly do you mean with "assumably"?

Because Oberyn and Onegu fakeclaimed. Don´t get me wrong, i think it´s likely that you were rb´d/jailed but it´s not sure.

I would like to hear what Oberyn and Onegu were trying to achieve by this? Because given 2 roleblock claims it´s reasonable to assume one of them is a jailkeeper. In case mafia roleblocked Clarity (which seems to be the case here) they would know they did not roleblock you. That would give them a good reason to lure out a jailer claim.


I don' t think that's a reasonable assumption at all. Plausible, yes. But not so overwhelmingly likely that you should assume it.
Two scum roleblockers in this large a game isn't that strange

If there is a jailer xata would be a good target, if there is a town roleblocker then it makes more sense for him to target me over xata.

What Oberyn & Onegu did would be a good scum strategy aswell. The strange thing here is that noone claimed the roleblock on Xata. In any case (assuming O&O are town) that player kinda has to assume they are telling the truth (especially if that player is mafia), and basically HAS to claim JK. Assume you are mafia roleblocker and rb´d Xata. Two townies claim, do you assume the watcher has your name or would you take your chances with not claiming?


Assume you are town jailkeeper, why do you not claim?
You're using logic that works both ways and are applying it to only one side.

Could one of onegu/oberyn be scum? yeah. Could both be? I'm pretty sure not so much.

That´s the point. If i was town JK i would claim. If i was scum RB´r i would claim.
Unless i know the cake is a lie.


I considered oberyn's claim to be a possible fakeclaim. I thought Onegu's claim was real though. If I am scum I just hope it's a fakeclaim because if I claim jailkeeper in thread I'm getting lynched regardless.

Ehh.. Why is that?


Why, if I'm scum would I rather hope its a fakeclaim than fakeclaim jailkeeper cause I think I'll get lynched anyway?
Because we were planning on lynching a jailkeeper claims anyway, perhaps?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 12:34 GMT
#2161
Anyway oberyn is pretty damn town. onegu could still be scum, obviously. This changes nothing as scum would have gone along with it anyway. If onegu is scum then it also makes sense that scum roleblock didn't claim.

That said, there are other scenario's where he's town and things still make sense.

Nice effort by oberyn, sadly didn't help us. No reason to wifom over it any longer
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 12:42 GMT
#2168
Xata. In titanic when I claimed roleblock n1 he immediately called me scum
I think rayn is one of those people that believe the moonlanding didn't happen.
Don't worry about it.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 13:21 GMT
#2192
Acro why do you say one of the two has to be scum in reply to me, and then you call it "pointless wifom" in the following post?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 13:35 GMT
#2202
On August 12 2013 22:27 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 22:21 Clarity_nl wrote:
Acro why do you say one of the two has to be scum in reply to me, and then you call it "pointless wifom" in the following post?

I never say that. I suggest you reread the notules of what I said. In my reply to you I am explaining how I think you're wrong about Blackfyres having balls of steel and go through the possibilities.

I never reached any conclusions, because we actually need some confirmation about which situation we're in: SnB or Vivax can still be the cause for Xatalos getting locked in, and there's a pretty good chance they are Blackfyre scum (one, or both). Lord knows what their profession is, but it's possible one is a jailer.

What I absolutely DON'T think is that we can just conclude Oberyn and Onegu are loyal from this, because it seems farfetched that IF Xatalos was locked in by a Blackfyre and they did not know about the plot, I believe they 100% WOULD have claimed.


I disagree. Me and xata came to the conclusion that unless the jailkeeper claim came from someone already thought to be town, we would end up lynching him. The way oberyn refused to give the 2nd name made it plausible for it to be a fakeclaim.
I'd take the gamble as scum.

Anyway, if we go with your conclusion, then our lynchpool tomorrow would look like this:

snb
vivax
onegu
oberyn
+ whoever didn't post between the fakeclaim and the confession of said fakeclaim (surely its more people than just snb and vivax?)

That said, vivax spent a lot of time with me in pms n1 trying to convince me yamato is scum, so I think he's town.
Oberyn, if scum, has played an amazing scumgame. Look at my interaction with him d1. So I think he's town

That leaves onegu and snb, and I'm okay with that at this point, even if we came to the list with a conclusion I disagree with.

Refreshing before I post: jkirby and koshi didn't post in that window according to onegu. I don't really like a koshi lynch but jkirby is definitely and option too.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 13:36 GMT
#2204
Erm, I bolded the entire last paragraph but I disagree with excluding the possibility that scum was around but gambled on the fact that oberyn fakeclaimed.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 13:40 GMT
#2208
On August 12 2013 22:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Onegu why are you lying? Or Clarity?


\Because he's scum and he gains a lot by lying about this because surely no one would doublecheck him or have a better memory.
I just saw his post and assumed it was true. Doesn't change anything anyway I don't really wanna lynch koshi.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 13:50 GMT
#2218
On August 12 2013 22:44 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 22:36 Clarity_nl wrote:
Erm, I bolded the entire last paragraph but I disagree with excluding the possibility that scum was around but gambled on the fact that oberyn fakeclaimed.

Well, when people make weird claims I am pretty good at calling them out on it, but this one-two went right by me. I briefly considered the possibility with both being a Martell, but was quick to conclude it was just a coincidence. Watching Xatalos is not very farfetched, and the clame timing makes sense as well: he watched someone get locked up at home. Not as damning as watching a kill happen, but has a good chance of flushing out Blackfyres.

So the claim made sense.

A Blackfyre reaching this conclusion and deciding to gamble his life on Oberyn not knowing his name seems really unlikely. I don't see how you can think otherwise.


As I said I'm willing to go with it for now. The lynchpool it produces is cool by me.

Since oberyn didn't reveal names a fakeclaim was my first thought.
Then again I didn't consider that if onegu wasn't part of it (and I thought he wasn't) that a town oberyn would be revealing a blue role.

So yeah, maybe with some more thought into it your conclusion makes more sense.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 13:52 GMT
#2221
On August 12 2013 22:50 iamperfection wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 22:47 Koshi wrote:
On August 12 2013 22:35 iamperfection wrote:
On August 12 2013 22:34 Koshi wrote:
On August 12 2013 22:32 Onegu wrote:
Btw its not just Snb and Vivax absent, Jrkirby hasnt posted, and I think koshi also just posted for the first time.

THAT REMINDS ME OF YOUR SHITTY CASE ON ME. HAHAHAHA

You scum Onegu?

lol speaking of shitty cases maybe you should go read the one you just posted.

You can only claim stupid or scum tbh.
What vigi was ever going to shoot gumshoe? herpderp I better us my vigi shot on a 1 hp lurker (or at least very low) Like how is that even the most plausible reason why gum died???? Most likely is that one in your House is scum or you are scum. Like 99% scum killed gumshoe, 1% a retarded vigi.

listen you retard how the fuck would the vigi know that gum had 1 hp


That's a fair point but a LOT of people were aware of who was getting lord kp'd that night.
Surely the vigi if he did not know would try to find out before shooting someone?

As town vigi I would not shoot the person the lords are kping, even if he didn't die close to nightpost.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 14:13 GMT
#2239
On August 12 2013 23:12 Oatsmaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 23:09 Acrofales wrote:
On August 12 2013 23:06 Oatsmaster wrote:
On August 12 2013 23:05 Acrofales wrote:
On August 12 2013 23:04 Oatsmaster wrote:
On August 12 2013 22:55 Acrofales wrote:
@Oberyn: I probably should have waited with revealing the detective's information, but I saw the PM urging me to talk to the other lords and saw no point in just telling the lords, so I told the general populace. Waiting may have revealed some associative tells from Yamato and may have been the better course of action. Your kinsman has not been taking our meeting seriously since its very start, though, so I don't think we missed out on much.

Why didnt you talk with Sharrant instead of outing him?

He was already outed? You should come south, my dear Lord Stark. All that cold is freezing your brain to the point of utter uselessness.

He is in your house right? I and I dont think anyone else thought he was the cop before you posted that yamato got checked.

Yeah yeah. You're a Blackfyre. Nobody is really this stupid.

So lets ask other dudes.

Before Acro claimed the red check on Yamato, who thought that Sharrant was cop?

On August 12 2013 22:55 Acrofales wrote:
@Oberyn: I probably should have waited with revealing the detective's information, but I saw the PM urging me to talk to the other lords and saw no point in just telling the lords, so I told the general populace. Waiting may have revealed some associative tells from Yamato and may have been the better course of action. Your kinsman has not been taking our meeting seriously since its very start, though, so I don't think we missed out on much.


Read the thread for once, oats.

FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 14:19 GMT
#2243
You're asking why he outed sharrant. That is why.

Can you come to a conclusion or something please.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 14:19 GMT
#2245
On August 12 2013 23:19 iamperfection wrote:
through pms im 95% sure that oats is town


Me too, sadly.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 14:24 GMT
#2250
On August 12 2013 23:20 Oatsmaster wrote:
What clarity? All that says is that Acro just claimed the check. NOT WHY. FUCK READING GUYS.


It says he got urged to talk to the lords, but felt that there was no reason to keep it from the thread.
He says that in hindsight he should have waited.

There are reasons. If you think the reasons are shitty, say so and why.
Otherwise stop being so damn useless.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 14:32 GMT
#2259
What do you mean post red flip. The reveal of the check in thread or?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 14:44 GMT
#2273
On August 12 2013 23:34 Oberyn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 23:32 Clarity_nl wrote:
What do you mean post red flip. The reveal of the check in thread or?


The check/trolling of the thread.


So it's all useless wifom because this happened after he claimed scum, is what you're saying?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 14:46 GMT
#2277
nvm I'm being dumb. Gonna take a break
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 15:19 GMT
#2300
On August 12 2013 23:53 Acrofales wrote:
@Clarity: what do you think about SnB?


Vivax summed it up nicely.

I'm kinda torn though. n0 he felt town. His pressure on me and then backing off when it wasn't going anywhere (and the pm conversation we've had about it) felt town.
That said, he hasn't done anything since.

He said he wanted to run for lord again n2 but I definitely don't want him as lord again.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 15:31 GMT
#2311
On August 13 2013 00:29 Oatsmaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 00:28 Koshi wrote:
On August 13 2013 00:25 Oatsmaster wrote:
Yeah acro.
Its not cause Yamato flips town.

Even after the baby seals and the gifs? lol... Impossible. The guy makes a podcast. He will not trow a game like this.

I dont understand what you are saying.


He's saying yamato is confirmed scum.

Not that it matters since oyu said it doesnt matter what yamato flips you want to lynch acro.

I'm annoyed, why can't people just understand eachother?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 16:34 GMT
#2334
On August 13 2013 01:29 Risen wrote:
No need to ask, just do. It's looks scummy to me when people don't appear confident.


Risen are you scum?
Between your shitty d1 and useless d2 I find it hard to think of you as town.

And now this post, where you tell someone they're looking scummy and they should do something differently so they stop looking scummy. Like what the fuck?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 16:35 GMT
#2335
"Dude you look like scum, here let me help you fix that"

as opposed to

"Dude you look like scum, you're scum!"
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 17:16 GMT
#2351
Risen when asked what happened to your opening giant post and what you still believe in you gave a very generic answer. Could you just like, take the 5 names you said were scum and tell us your current reads on them?

For reference:
Oats
Dl
Xata
Grack
Clarity
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 17:22 GMT
#2354
On August 13 2013 02:18 Risen wrote:
Really though my number one scum read right now is Rayn.


The extent of what I know of your read on rayn is about the same as what I know of all your other reads:
On August 13 2013 01:31 Risen wrote:
Shit. Rayne is scum.


Care to elaborate?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 17:27 GMT
#2357
On August 13 2013 02:25 Risen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 02:22 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 13 2013 02:18 Risen wrote:
Really though my number one scum read right now is Rayn.


The extent of what I know of your read on rayn is about the same as what I know of all your other reads:
On August 13 2013 01:31 Risen wrote:
Shit. Rayne is scum.


Care to elaborate?


It's not a read.


Jesus christ.

On August 13 2013 02:18 Risen wrote:
Really though my number one scum read right now is Rayn.


???
WHY DO YOU THINK RAYN IS SCUM YOU FUCKER
THIS ISNT DIFFICULT
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 17:54 GMT
#2368
I think risen is a great lord kp target btw.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 17:58 GMT
#2375
On August 13 2013 02:56 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 02:54 Clarity_nl wrote:
I think risen is a great lord kp target btw.

Why?


He's completely useless yet still posting in an active manner.

Clearly he's following the thread but he doesn't care about figuring the game out or making himself readable.
All he's done is call people scum (the wrong people, too) without any reasoning.

Kill it with fire.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 19:17 GMT
#2415
Risen where's your promised giant post after lunch?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 19:55 GMT
#2433
Scum try to emulate a town mindset but they don't always succeed, if they did scum would win 100% of the time.
Saying "what you're saying is WIFOM" is not only, dumb, it's also untrue in this case.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 20:29 GMT
#2446
Before I fall asleep please RIsen
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 20:57 GMT
#2463
Doesn't really matter. Highly unlikely town would roleblock you, so the roleblock came from scum or scum withheld a roleblock to give you town cred which you already had.

So you're town. Don't really care about the rest.
Stop measuring dicks please.

FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 21:00 GMT
#2469
Risen your case has some valid points. Yamato had a pretty big chance of getting lynched so it could be a bus.

That said, you're bending some stuff to make your case more convincing.
For example, why wouldn't a regular cop (not 1 shot) claim 1 shot cop? Gives you a (small) chance at another check.
I don't see a reason to lynch him d3. If he's town he'll die to scum eventually or scum will have to waste (or withhold) roleblocks on him.

I'm more interested in your scumread on me and grack. Could you (possibly in less than 4 paragraphs) explain them please?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 21:02 GMT
#2470
On August 13 2013 05:59 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 05:57 Clarity_nl wrote:
Doesn't really matter. Highly unlikely town would roleblock you, so the roleblock came from scum or scum withheld a roleblock to give you town cred which you already had.

So you're town. Don't really care about the rest.
Stop measuring dicks please.



That's not entirely true. In my latest scumgame I used our roleblocks on myself repeatedly to give me more towncred even though I was already a generally accepted townread. You should go read my scumgames. I rarely get suspected as scum.


Well that's cool and all, and I do have this in my notes:
xata points out that acro and oberyn can't both be scum, I agree
He seems friendly and helpful to my ideas but his conclusion everytime is "could be, could not be, dunno"

But as I said, you already had some town cred so withholding a roleblock would be silly. If you're still alive d6 with towncred people should reconsider.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 21:08 GMT
#2472
Do you agree while, that the possibility exists that sharrant is scum, he's a bad lynch or nk n2/d2?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 21:16 GMT
#2479
On August 13 2013 06:10 Risen wrote:
Previous post was made prior to seeing clarity's.

If shar isn't the nk then he should absolutely be the lynch tomorrow barring something unusual during the night. What is one thing sharr has done this entire game beyond giving us yamato?


I shall sleep on it.

To anyone to whom it may concern: If you think there's a chance you might get nightkilled, prepare a list of reads and send them to the peoples in yo crib. Have them post it if you die, or post it yourself if you live.
Don't try to force reads if you're uncertain, but everyone should have at least a couple of decent reads by now.

I retract my idea of using house kp on risen. Johnny is probably a good target. Or kush (although some are calling him town? dunno, he's useless though)

Nighty night
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 21:17 GMT
#2480
@ acro, you just described his town meta (or at least, this is how he was in titanic)

I'm also curious why johnny is lynchbait

Anyway, gnight
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 21:28 GMT
#2487
YOU CAUGHT ME IM STILL HERE

Erm.. He spammed. his filter was like 45 pages or something.
He theorized about conspiracy's (like this game)
He focused on little inconsistencies even if they are explained somewhere in the thread (like this game)
He asked peoples opinion on stuff without giving his own (like this game)

He's town or he emulates his townplay extremely well as scum.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 21:30 GMT
#2489
conspiracies* I really need to sleep
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 12 2013 21:34 GMT
#2491
On August 13 2013 06:28 Clarity_nl wrote:
YOU CAUGHT ME IM STILL HERE

Erm.. He spammed. his filter was like 45 pages or something.
He theorized about conspiracy's (like this game)
He focused on little inconsistencies even if they are explained somewhere in the thread (like this game)
He asked peoples opinion on stuff without giving his own (like this game)

He's town or he emulates his townplay extremely well as scum.


Either they were explained or they were irrelevant and by questioning it he just filled up space*

OKAY BED I PROMISE
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 06:35 GMT
#2653
Please post this in thread if I die (whoever is around first), if I don't die I'll post it myself.

Sharrant:
Maybe reconsider if he lives till d5 or something. Obviously yamato already had a ton of pressure so it's possible that it was a bus.

Oberyn: Yes, there is scum motive in his fakeclaim if the 2nd person on xata turns out to be town jailkeeper.
It's however pretty unlikely. Other than that he's totes town yo.

Oatsmaster:
Kneejerk responses, natural flow. He's not playing his best but he's shining green all day erryday

iamperfection:
I'm going off a year old meta but he reminds me of Mario Mini Mafia. Apparantly also very townie in pms.

raynpelikoneet:
Shitting up the thread, convinced in his argument and shouting it non stop? Like deja vu or something (titanic mini)

Xatalos:
His exchange with me early d2, trying to figure stuff out. It made me feel he was town.
Turns out he apparantly felt the same. Only weird thing was him trying to convince me faking a roleblock is his scum meta, while telling rayn he was dumb for even thinking he might be faking a roleblock
+ Show Spoiler +
On August 12 2013 21:12 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 21:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 20:17 Xatalos wrote:
On August 12 2013 19:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What in Ace´s posts makes him scum?

Back to the drawing board with Oberyn & Onegu i guess.
O&O, why do you think the guy who assumably roleblocked Xatalos did not claim?


What exactly do you mean with "assumably"?

Because Oberyn and Onegu fakeclaimed. Don´t get me wrong, i think it´s likely that you were rb´d/jailed but it´s not sure.

I would like to hear what Oberyn and Onegu were trying to achieve by this? Because given 2 roleblock claims it´s reasonable to assume one of them is a jailkeeper. In case mafia roleblocked Clarity (which seems to be the case here) they would know they did not roleblock you. That would give them a good reason to lure out a jailer claim.


What would I achieve by fakeclaiming being roleblocked? The only reason I can think of is that game where I was scum and used our RB repeatedly on myself to gain townie points. Do you refer to that? If so, do you think I'm scum? There is really no other sensible reason to fakeclaim being roleblocked that I can think of. So why do you still doubt my claim?

Also, do you think Oberyn and Onegu made a public alliance to lure out a jailer? That seems pretty far-fetched to say the least.


If he's getting roleblocked all game or we suddenly miss a roleblock without a flip, it'll be time to look more closely to Xatalos.

Dandel Ion:
Abrasive, put himself in the spotlight a lot d1. Has slowed down recently though. Only popping in to be quirky and make quick jabs d2.
Probably still town, but less certain than I was d1.

Acrofales:
Roleplaying aside, his d2 was miles above his day 1. Plus this exchange makes him look really town in my eyes+ Show Spoiler +

On August 13 2013 05:06 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 05:06 Xatalos wrote:
On August 13 2013 04:59 Acrofales wrote:
On August 13 2013 04:56 Xatalos wrote:
On August 13 2013 04:47 Risen wrote:
I may not have written it in the case, but that would have simply weakened my case and distracted from it. I felt the interaction between you two was important. That's not very concrete so it didn't make the post.

Something that bothers me is that there wasn't really ever a response to my last case. Just a bunch of that's stupid posts along with he's crazy town now. People are now suspecting DI openly in thread. Why? Why now when you didn't respond to my case before?


I don't even.. How can my connection with DI be your ONLY reason for suspecting him when you made a whole case against him without even mentioning me at all? Your thought patterns are so full of holes.

The reason why nobody took your post seriously was because it was too bad to consider. There have been people suspecting DI all game for different (bad) reasons. The situation hasn't really changed to any direction. Acro isn't even really suspecting him now I think, just softpushing him in case he gets a chance to vote for him at some point.

Oh, I'm suspecting him. There's just no point in jumping the gun and yelling HE'S A BLACKFYRE and waving my arms when there are still a minimum of 80 hours before we can do anything about it.


You haven't taken any hard stances at any point though. You've only made weak lists and softpushed a lot of people. When are you going to start pushing things?

Hello Pot, I'm Kettle!

On August 13 2013 05:14 Acrofales wrote:
Not only am I comparing myself to you, but I am claiming that I have been more transparent and have been pushing my scumspects harder than you have, consistently, throughout the game.

In fact, the only one I can be sure of that you suspect of being a Blackfyre is me, and I have felt zero pressure from you.

On August 13 2013 05:43 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 05:21 Xatalos wrote:
On August 13 2013 05:14 Acrofales wrote:
Not only am I comparing myself to you, but I am claiming that I have been more transparent and have been pushing my scumspects harder than you have, consistently, throughout the game.

In fact, the only one I can be sure of that you suspect of being a Blackfyre is me, and I have felt zero pressure from you.


..............

What have you done except throwing slight suspicion at most people in the game?

What I have done:

- Pressured grackaroni during N0 (for his passive attitude to the vote)
- Pushed you for most of the game, ranging from slight suspicion to great suspicion
- Pushed Risen starting earlier today
- Softpushed several more people (every push can't be a hard push sadly)

You haven't pushed me, I can attest to that. At best you are starting now, but your earlier suspicions can be summarized by you every now and then interjecting that you think I'm a Blackfyre, with no reasons or any useful pressure to speak of. I have been ignoring it until now because of the utter lack of conviction behind it and figure it is just the same as in PTP when you had nonsense reasons that just went away during the game.

You started "pushing" Risen AFTER Strongandbig's case. I call that bandwagoning. You have not made an original case this entire game.

I have no idea whether you pushed Grack or not, because it happened at night, in private missives.

As for softpushing, if it was any softer than you pushed me, it must have had an adverse effect. In fact, it probably did, because I can't remember any of it. I remember some of your town reads, but that is it. Your liege seems to think you are a loyalist, and the happenings at night seem to indicate that also, but I find your claims to activity beyond preposterous.

Now make that case on me or shut up about it.


Doesn't matter that I don't believe it's true. He surely does.

Risen: So.... I really dunno what to make of his day 1, especially his opening post.
His case on sharrant had some good points. Doesn't mean I think sharrant is scum but it makes risen more likely to be town.
This is only a weak townread though. Hopefully he continues contributing stuff like his sharrant case.

strongandbig:
I liked his n0. I liked that he pushed me in thread but then backed off to let me scumhunt and then concluded I'm more likely town.
I just don't like any of the other stuff. d3 will determine my read on him. If he stays on course he's totally scum. Time to contribute or die snb...

Vivax:
Not a single pm n2. snb actually made a good point to me in pms. He's seemed to jump from read to read with his reasoning being "well the lords won't go for this so I'll look elsewhere", when the town vivax I remember would get mad that his targets aren't getting pushed and yell at people.
Doesn't seem involved or interested. His only saving grace is how much he pushed yamato in thread d1 and in pms n1.

S0lstice:
Yeah, his d1 was weird and his defense was weird and stuff but that's not what makes him scum.
This is + Show Spoiler +
On August 13 2013 11:53 s0Lstice wrote:
and ps, something that bothers me in particular about Acro is how he treated Oats

Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 03:54 Acrofales wrote:
On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.

So events happened like this.

I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever.
Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys?

Wait what? YOU are Ser Redacted? And when asked if something interested happened in the confines of your house (Winterfell, apparently), you decided to keep this rather controversial situation to the thread, saying that everything was groovy?

Explain yourself. Also, whatever gambit that was, it is atrocious. It doesn't sound indicative of Clarity's allegiance at all. It sounds like he gave you his real name and you derped it up, by claiming some nonsense name magic. I don't understand at all how you deduce that he is not a Blackfyre infiltrant from that, unless you were already privy to that information and were just dicking around.

While I often find it hard to uncover your motivations for doing things, this seems like a particularly stupid gaff. At first my grievances were with your lord, but it's possible that your entire house is Blackfyre scum?


Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 04:07 Acrofales wrote:
On August 09 2013 03:59 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 03:54 Acrofales wrote:
On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.

So events happened like this.

I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever.
Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys?

Wait what? YOU are Ser Redacted? And when asked if something interested happened in the confines of your house (Winterfell, apparently), you decided to keep this rather controversial situation to the thread, saying that everything was groovy?

Explain yourself. Also, whatever gambit that was, it is atrocious. It doesn't sound indicative of Clarity's allegiance at all. It sounds like he gave you his real name and you derped it up, by claiming some nonsense name magic. I don't understand at all how you deduce that he is not a Blackfyre infiltrant from that, unless you were already privy to that information and were just dicking around.

While I often find it hard to uncover your motivations for doing things, this seems like a particularly stupid gaff. At first my grievances were with your lord, but it's possible that your entire house is Blackfyre scum?


Yes because obviously with that exchange between me and oats, the possibility that we're both scum somehow still remains?
But yeah, whether I am town or scum I'd have reacted the same way, most likely.
That said, do you think Oats as scum pushes me really hard for my rolename (he underemphasized this, it was like 5 pms each of him asking me rolename and me asking "why?") and then when I refuse to give it he makes up a role like that?

Seems a bit farfetched for scum just to "dick around"


Where do I say you're both Blackfyre pretenders? The exchange between you and Oats seems like intentional bad play by Oats, and his subsequent behaviour in this public hall has been to intentionally obscure information that would have been far more relevant at the time than his derpfest bickering with Yamato. Why would a loyal citizen intentionally derail the discussion, rather than presenting an interesting topic for discussion?

I exaggerated with the "whole house" bit, but I have some serious suspicions of Oatsmaster and Strongandbig.


His message here is pretty clear. Serious suspicion of Oats. He later qualifies this by saying that no in fact Oats is not scum, he just wanted to see more.

Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 22:03 Acrofales wrote:
On August 09 2013 14:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
On August 09 2013 14:44 FirmTofu wrote:
On August 09 2013 14:40 Oatsmaster wrote:
Acro's first post felt way more constructed. Like not even close to being natural cause he was Roleplaying. So I dont think its alignment indicative.

So you think the fact that it was more constructed makes it non-alignment indicative? Wouldn't scum be more worried about the content of their posts than town? Why would constructed flavor not be alignment indicative?

Because both scum and town have to construct a roleplaying post. Its not natural either way so therefore the fact that its constructed is not alignment indicative. The content on the other hand, may be. I dunno.


In case my earlier discourse was unclear, Ser Oatsmaster has clearly traveled in the Reach and caught onto my way of speaking immediately.

Regarding the content: the young Tofu seems to think that I was afraid of calling Ser Oatsmaster a Blackfyre. Rest assured that if I had thought that, I would have called him a Blackfyre then and there. At the time, all I wanted was to hear more from him, and I said so.


Here is the more that Oats gave him in between those two thread presences:

+ Show Spoiler +

On August 09 2013 14:40 Oatsmaster wrote:
Acro's first post felt way more constructed. Like not even close to being natural cause he was Roleplaying. So I dont think its alignment indicative.

On August 09 2013 14:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 14:44 FirmTofu wrote:
On August 09 2013 14:40 Oatsmaster wrote:
Acro's first post felt way more constructed. Like not even close to being natural cause he was Roleplaying. So I dont think its alignment indicative.

So you think the fact that it was more constructed makes it non-alignment indicative? Wouldn't scum be more worried about the content of their posts than town? Why would constructed flavor not be alignment indicative?

Because both scum and town have to construct a roleplaying post. Its not natural either way so therefore the fact that its constructed is not alignment indicative. The content on the other hand, may be. I dunno.

Ok so I was looking through johnnywup's filter and I saw this
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 05:57 johnnywup wrote:
i don't have any extra information and its the first thing that came to mind for a 3p wincon in a themed setup like this. robert barath trying to kill targs is like pretty big in lore so it came to mind pretty quickly. I posted the exact same thought in a PM to my housemates and none seemed to think it was scummy.

And its really weird that his defence is 'none of my housemates think it was scummy'. Shows an attitude of caring about his appearance. Not that he was wrong about the 3p or whatever but that his suggestion did not look scummy to other people. Weird mindset. Thoughts?

On August 09 2013 15:15 Oatsmaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 14:58 johnnywup wrote:
he said it was scummy that I had that thought and I said that others saw it and some thought the exact opposite. Maybe that doesn't even really matter but I thought it was worth pointing out.

Why is it worth pointing out?

Why didnt you explain why its not scummy to think that there is a 3p

On August 09 2013 15:40 Oatsmaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 15:19 johnnywup wrote:
I dunno, I just thought it was. Does that bother you?

It's scummy to think there's a 3p?

It bothers me that your defence is 'these guys think its not scummy'

On August 09 2013 15:47 Oatsmaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 15:44 johnnywup wrote:
it's hardly a defense i'm sure you'll agree. i didn't really intend for it to be a defense. I was just pointing out a contrast. Do you think I'm scum?

yes

On August 09 2013 16:19 Oatsmaster wrote:
So which lurker do you want to die Xata?

On August 09 2013 16:38 Oatsmaster wrote:
I feel that kush will show his alignment either way.

So you are basically suggesting a policy nk on lurkers right?
Cause you dont have specific targets. I dont know if I agree.


After this he returns, but nothing on Oats. We would be lead to believe that this is because Oats has satisfied whatever was bothering Acro about him. What in those quotes would set his suspicions to rest? Oats activity has actually dropped as the game has gone on, which would presumably ring some bells for Acro. More, in those quotes, Oats attacked johnnywup primarily.

Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 06:15 Acrofales wrote:
--snip
In my humble opinion, johnnywup is the most obvious lynchbait in the thread


Thats from his case on Rayn. One of his points is that Rayn attacked johnnywup.

Again, we are at the mercy of PMs here, so I dunno what Acro was doing in regards to Oats in PM land. I'd like to know though Acro when you get the chance.

Giant post against acro, asking him to explain. Not calling him scum or anything, he'd just "like to know what happened"
Here is acro's response:

On August 13 2013 12:47 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 11:53 s0Lstice wrote:
and ps, something that bothers me in particular about Acro is how he treated Oats

On August 09 2013 03:54 Acrofales wrote:
On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.

So events happened like this.

I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever.
Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys?

Wait what? YOU are Ser Redacted? And when asked if something interested happened in the confines of your house (Winterfell, apparently), you decided to keep this rather controversial situation to the thread, saying that everything was groovy?

Explain yourself. Also, whatever gambit that was, it is atrocious. It doesn't sound indicative of Clarity's allegiance at all. It sounds like he gave you his real name and you derped it up, by claiming some nonsense name magic. I don't understand at all how you deduce that he is not a Blackfyre infiltrant from that, unless you were already privy to that information and were just dicking around.

While I often find it hard to uncover your motivations for doing things, this seems like a particularly stupid gaff. At first my grievances were with your lord, but it's possible that your entire house is Blackfyre scum?


On August 09 2013 04:07 Acrofales wrote:
On August 09 2013 03:59 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 03:54 Acrofales wrote:
On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.

So events happened like this.

I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever.
Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys?

Wait what? YOU are Ser Redacted? And when asked if something interested happened in the confines of your house (Winterfell, apparently), you decided to keep this rather controversial situation to the thread, saying that everything was groovy?

Explain yourself. Also, whatever gambit that was, it is atrocious. It doesn't sound indicative of Clarity's allegiance at all. It sounds like he gave you his real name and you derped it up, by claiming some nonsense name magic. I don't understand at all how you deduce that he is not a Blackfyre infiltrant from that, unless you were already privy to that information and were just dicking around.

While I often find it hard to uncover your motivations for doing things, this seems like a particularly stupid gaff. At first my grievances were with your lord, but it's possible that your entire house is Blackfyre scum?


Yes because obviously with that exchange between me and oats, the possibility that we're both scum somehow still remains?
But yeah, whether I am town or scum I'd have reacted the same way, most likely.
That said, do you think Oats as scum pushes me really hard for my rolename (he underemphasized this, it was like 5 pms each of him asking me rolename and me asking "why?") and then when I refuse to give it he makes up a role like that?

Seems a bit farfetched for scum just to "dick around"


Where do I say you're both Blackfyre pretenders? The exchange between you and Oats seems like intentional bad play by Oats, and his subsequent behaviour in this public hall has been to intentionally obscure information that would have been far more relevant at the time than his derpfest bickering with Yamato. Why would a loyal citizen intentionally derail the discussion, rather than presenting an interesting topic for discussion?

I exaggerated with the "whole house" bit, but I have some serious suspicions of Oatsmaster and Strongandbig.


His message here is pretty clear. Serious suspicion of Oats. He later qualifies this by saying that no in fact Oats is not scum, he just wanted to see more.

On August 09 2013 22:03 Acrofales wrote:
On August 09 2013 14:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
On August 09 2013 14:44 FirmTofu wrote:
On August 09 2013 14:40 Oatsmaster wrote:
Acro's first post felt way more constructed. Like not even close to being natural cause he was Roleplaying. So I dont think its alignment indicative.

So you think the fact that it was more constructed makes it non-alignment indicative? Wouldn't scum be more worried about the content of their posts than town? Why would constructed flavor not be alignment indicative?

Because both scum and town have to construct a roleplaying post. Its not natural either way so therefore the fact that its constructed is not alignment indicative. The content on the other hand, may be. I dunno.


In case my earlier discourse was unclear, Ser Oatsmaster has clearly traveled in the Reach and caught onto my way of speaking immediately.

Regarding the content: the young Tofu seems to think that I was afraid of calling Ser Oatsmaster a Blackfyre. Rest assured that if I had thought that, I would have called him a Blackfyre then and there. At the time, all I wanted was to hear more from him, and I said so.


Here is the more that Oats gave him in between those two thread presences:

+ Show Spoiler +

On August 09 2013 14:40 Oatsmaster wrote:
Acro's first post felt way more constructed. Like not even close to being natural cause he was Roleplaying. So I dont think its alignment indicative.

On August 09 2013 14:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 14:44 FirmTofu wrote:
On August 09 2013 14:40 Oatsmaster wrote:
Acro's first post felt way more constructed. Like not even close to being natural cause he was Roleplaying. So I dont think its alignment indicative.

So you think the fact that it was more constructed makes it non-alignment indicative? Wouldn't scum be more worried about the content of their posts than town? Why would constructed flavor not be alignment indicative?

Because both scum and town have to construct a roleplaying post. Its not natural either way so therefore the fact that its constructed is not alignment indicative. The content on the other hand, may be. I dunno.

Ok so I was looking through johnnywup's filter and I saw this
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 05:57 johnnywup wrote:
i don't have any extra information and its the first thing that came to mind for a 3p wincon in a themed setup like this. robert barath trying to kill targs is like pretty big in lore so it came to mind pretty quickly. I posted the exact same thought in a PM to my housemates and none seemed to think it was scummy.

And its really weird that his defence is 'none of my housemates think it was scummy'. Shows an attitude of caring about his appearance. Not that he was wrong about the 3p or whatever but that his suggestion did not look scummy to other people. Weird mindset. Thoughts?

On August 09 2013 15:15 Oatsmaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 14:58 johnnywup wrote:
he said it was scummy that I had that thought and I said that others saw it and some thought the exact opposite. Maybe that doesn't even really matter but I thought it was worth pointing out.

Why is it worth pointing out?

Why didnt you explain why its not scummy to think that there is a 3p

On August 09 2013 15:40 Oatsmaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 15:19 johnnywup wrote:
I dunno, I just thought it was. Does that bother you?

It's scummy to think there's a 3p?

It bothers me that your defence is 'these guys think its not scummy'

On August 09 2013 15:47 Oatsmaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 15:44 johnnywup wrote:
it's hardly a defense i'm sure you'll agree. i didn't really intend for it to be a defense. I was just pointing out a contrast. Do you think I'm scum?

yes

On August 09 2013 16:19 Oatsmaster wrote:
So which lurker do you want to die Xata?

On August 09 2013 16:38 Oatsmaster wrote:
I feel that kush will show his alignment either way.

So you are basically suggesting a policy nk on lurkers right?
Cause you dont have specific targets. I dont know if I agree.


After this he returns, but nothing on Oats. We would be lead to believe that this is because Oats has satisfied whatever was bothering Acro about him. What in those quotes would set his suspicions to rest? Oats activity has actually dropped as the game has gone on, which would presumably ring some bells for Acro. More, in those quotes, Oats attacked johnnywup primarily.

On August 13 2013 06:15 Acrofales wrote:
--snip
In my humble opinion, johnnywup is the most obvious lynchbait in the thread


Thats from his case on Rayn. One of his points is that Rayn attacked johnnywup.

Again, we are at the mercy of PMs here, so I dunno what Acro was doing in regards to Oats in PM land. I'd like to know though Acro when you get the chance.


You quote (early) D1 stuff. On D1 I was clearly not in contact with Ser Oats, because Lord Strongandbig was lord of Winterfell. In D2 I have exchanged 1 PM with Ser Oats, in which I called him scum and he told me to fuck off. It was not very productive.

The bit in the case against Rayn is also not for him just attacking lynch bait. It's that he calls lynchbait scum and then just forgets about it.


HERE IS WHAT SOLSTICE REPLIES WITH:
On August 13 2013 13:01 s0Lstice wrote:
you've satisfied me Acro

I think you're crazy, but I believe that you believe that rayn and oats are scum


WHAT??? HOW?!?! Acro just told you that he wasn't pming with oats and on d2 he sent him 1 pm telling oats that he's scum
He didn't answer any of s0lstice's questions. Yet s0lstice is satisfied?? Clearly he just cared that he was answered.
This implies he clearly did not care about finding scum, nor did he care about the content of the answer to his question.
Why? Because he's scum and he already knows everyone's alignment, and the only reason he made a giant post was to appear active.


Onegu:
Day 1: soft defends some people and does nothing
Day 2: Other than co-operating with oberyn (which is null at best, scum at worst since no one claimed the roleblock) he does nothing

Here's the thing though..... he's not a lurker. He has 8 pages of filter. Yet he has done nothing.
Notice how many questions he asks, how little he follows up, and how he doesn't appear to get reads off of the answers he gets.
That is scum trying to appear active and trying to blend in. Also association: + Show Spoiler +
On August 11 2013 22:31 Onegu wrote:
I have been talking with yamato and some of his stances and thoughts on oberyn made me have a townie feeling on him. He said he was going to post a case on Acro but hasnt done it yet though.



Fuck knows category:
johnnywup: apparantly he's lynchbait? I dunno, just looks like scum to me. Apparently isn't. Would love someone to explain this properly.
kush: I can't read this guy. What snb said is correct though, if he's right about everything then he's scum. Total troll though. Shoot this guy.
Koshi: I couldn't actually remember ANYTHING he did d2... then I checked his filter and yeah.... not so great. Starting to become another good vigi shot.
Chromatically: Apparantly he's been scumhunting well in pms...? I really hate this. Scumhunt in the damn thread. From the thread alone he looks scummy to me.
grack: I dunno

Everyone else: meh
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 06:42 GMT
#2659
Turns out they split the kp to kill a bunch of people today, or at least that's the likeliest explanation in my eyes.
This makes one of xata/grack more likely to be scum since they were both aware of gumshoe's 1 hp before n1 nightpost.
Still very unlikely it's a townshot. I thought it might have been iamp as a vigi.... but obviously that's not the case.
I didn't include grack in my post cause I ran outta time to make it and had a hard time getting read on him.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 06:43 GMT
#2660
That said, my vote goes to s0lstice for the points I made in my list.

##Vote s0lstice
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 06:59 GMT
#2665
Also please explain how Risen got lord instead of rayn. Did Risen not budge and rayn was forced to consolidate or?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 07:03 GMT
#2667
On August 14 2013 16:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2013 15:59 Clarity_nl wrote:
Also please explain how Risen got lord instead of rayn. Did Risen not budge and rayn was forced to consolidate or?

Pretty much yeah.


Did you find that to be scummy?
I disagree with your assessment of mocsta's list btw.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 07:28 GMT
#2673
On August 14 2013 16:21 Mocsta wrote:
Clarity
Regarding onegu
Here's a stupid thing.. take it as u want

That house list before the night post. He was meant to pm that to me.. instead he posted in the thread.
Anyways. He pms going sorry. I'm going to be modkilled what do I do.
I suggested apologise to Dr.p and edit out.

Anyways. If this guy was a scummer. I imagine first course of action is to go to qt... Not pm me.
Weak heuristic I know. So take it as u want.


Bleh. I guess? I wanna lynch s0lstice today anyway so he has a chance to show he's town other than tripping on his own feet and crying green tears rather than red ones.

What do you think of my point on s0lstice?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 08:24 GMT
#2677
Just a quick observation.
The fact that I got roleblocked n1 but not roleblocked or killed n2 suggests it was a town action. This makes it more likely that xata is town since it's more likely it's a scum roleblock.

@mocsta, it's worth noting that iamp came to the defense of chrom really quickly in thread. I just hope he shows us in thread what he apparantly showed iamp in pms (and s0lstice did the same but I think he's scum)
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 08:26 GMT
#2678
btw what was this about mocsta?
On August 13 2013 13:56 Mocsta wrote:
Who should I jail tonight?


Oats asks if you're claiming jailkeeper which is not a dumb question (which is what you told him), rather an obvious one actually. Am I missing something?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 08:49 GMT
#2683
On August 14 2013 17:33 Mocsta wrote:
Clarity
I agree with the rb logic
So... That leaves us with the gracken

Q about sol
Do u think higher chance of mafia or 3p

Don't jump on me for the 3p...it's a question to check how emotionally attached u r to the read.


I honestly don't really distinguish between the two. If someone isn't town then they should be lynched unless something crazy happens. That's a weird question though, what are you getting at?

On August 14 2013 17:42 johnnywup wrote:
Sorry my Internets being really dumb. mocsta, i had a post that I was going to post about why I thought risen/Koshi is scum, but it boils down to this:

Sharrant has a good case on Koshi, I'll let him post it himself.

Risen is trying to lynch the guy that gave us scum for free. It seems unlikely to be a bus to me because Yamato wasn't even really in the limelight and no one would give their scum buddy away when they're not even being scrutinized (I think..I've never played as scum). Like, sharrant is the one person who actually gave us scum on a platter, and risen wants to lynch him. What? And if any of you want to point out me agreeing with risens case, yes I changed my mind because I actually thought about it more and I liked it less and less. I'm pretty convinced sharrant is town.

Show nested quote +
On August 14 2013 16:21 Mocsta wrote:
Clarity
Regarding onegu
Here's a stupid thing.. take it as u want

That house list before the night post. He was meant to pm that to me.. instead he posted in the thread.
Anyways. He pms going sorry. I'm going to be modkilled what do I do.
I suggested apologise to Dr.p and edit out.

Anyways. If this guy was a scummer. I imagine first course of action is to go to qt... Not pm me.
Weak heuristic I know. So take it as u want.


This is simply incorrect.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 09:27 GMT
#2688
On August 14 2013 18:24 Koshi wrote:
Also Mocsta, could you analyze jrkirby his filter? I find it suspicious you don't say anything about that. Now with the current flips jrkirby looks scummy as fuck. You putting iamp on top of your scumlist right before he dies is feeling so wrong as well. It just feels completely wrong. btw I made a case on iamp before, which you seemed to have missed? But all other people said iamp was town, and then right before (or should I say after?) he dies you put him on top of the your scumlist.


Yeah, but if he's scum surely he knows iamp is gonna die. Why put him as a scumread when you know he's gonna flip town?
Not saying it makes him confirmed town or anything but I don't really see why it "feels wrong".
Walk me through a scum mindset of putting the town who is about to flip as a scumread in your fake deathpost
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 09:38 GMT
#2691
On August 14 2013 18:33 Koshi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2013 18:27 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 14 2013 18:24 Koshi wrote:
Also Mocsta, could you analyze jrkirby his filter? I find it suspicious you don't say anything about that. Now with the current flips jrkirby looks scummy as fuck. You putting iamp on top of your scumlist right before he dies is feeling so wrong as well. It just feels completely wrong. btw I made a case on iamp before, which you seemed to have missed? But all other people said iamp was town, and then right before (or should I say after?) he dies you put him on top of the your scumlist.


Yeah, but if he's scum surely he knows iamp is gonna die. Why put him as a scumread when you know he's gonna flip town?
Not saying it makes him confirmed town or anything but I don't really see why it "feels wrong".
Walk me through a scum mindset of putting the town who is about to flip as a scumread in your fake deathpost

1) Onegu did mocsta send this to you during the night? I got a feeling that he didn't. Nothing in his post suggest that btw Clarity.
2) Exactly because somebody would say that. "omg if he is scum he wouldn't put his top scumread on top because iamp will die."

Clarity? What do you think of jrkirby his filter now that you see these 2 flips?



1)
On August 14 2013 15:35 Onegu wrote:
Moscta sent me his list before daypost.


2) WIFOM

I think jkirby looked like a lurker and I think there's a reason he got replaced. I also think mocsta is looking town, or at the very least useful. I don't think he's a good lynch today and you should comment on the two scumreads I put in my list.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 09:51 GMT
#2695
Xata did iamp also tell grack this? If not could you explain why?
If so, can you confirm what xata has said grack?

Xata what do you think about my points on s0lstice?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 09:57 GMT
#2698
On August 14 2013 18:53 Koshi wrote:
nope, that's way to easy. Wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy toooooo eassssyyyyyy.

Those questions are scummy. Did you read Ver his analysis on Sicilian?
Asking questions like:
"Can we PM ouside our House?"
"I don't understand how HP works, please explain it to me?"

See the similarity?
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2013 05:54 Koshi wrote:
I also got a couple questions, they might seem noob but I just want to verify:
1) Can we post PMs our mason made? This would mean that you can give more than 5 posts to your mason right? He just communicates through PM to you, and you copy paste in chat. Is this allowed? I see a chatlog posted and I am surprised.
2) In a normal game communication outside the thread is not allowed right? Even if you are 2 brothers playing the game you can't talk to each other about the game. Pure in theory.

Ver gave me a scumread just for this post. No other posts mattered, this one made me scum. Go read his analysis.


I think it has less to do with the questions and more to do with the "they might seem noob"
newbie card is likely scum, why discredit yourself if you're town and risk having no one listen to you?
As scum it's perfect if no one listens to you.

Plus the nature of the second question is just too silly to be a town question.

I don't really understand why you're talking about this though.
Can you comment on my reads now please?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 10:13 GMT
#2701
On August 14 2013 19:08 Koshi wrote:
S0lstice: Why would a scum player try to help me during n2 to prove my townyness? Small things like this make me think he is town. He makes pretty big PM posts and is trying to figure out the game. He is also Lord now so you guys can grill him to get his reads, I am certain he knows a lot of what is going on so you will get good reads/information out of him trough PMs.

Onegu: Big chance he is scum indeed. Together with Mocsta. I should filterdive and see how they interacted.


You really shouldn't. That's a pretty big waste of time. You won't convince anyone with an association case between two unflipped players.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 10:50 GMT
#2713
On August 14 2013 19:43 Koshi wrote:
But we should just lynch mocsta. Read the 20 posts kirby made. The only reason we didn't lynch this guy is because yamato decided to scumclaim. That's the only reason.

Well Mocsta has 48 hours to redeem jrkirby. But with yelling that I am going from null to scum because I say jrkirby his filter is horrible it is not going to work. THIS ALSO MEANS that mocsta have read kirby his filter and that mocsta finds kirby his filter TOWN. Otherwise he would agree with me and try to prove himself now.

LYNCH! LYNCH! LYNCH! LYNCH! LYNCH! LYNCH! LYNCH! LYNCH! LYNCH! LYNCH! LYNCH!


Why would he not say this, as either alignment? Either he's town who read his role pm or he's scum who's pretending that his role pm says he's town.....
Why would he ever agree to jkirby looking scummy if he opened his role pm and then read the game.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 10:52 GMT
#2714
Dandel, fancy commenting on my case on s0lstice?

I still think vivax is a bad lynch today.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 10:53 GMT
#2717
On August 14 2013 19:52 Dandel Ion wrote:
need to wait on something before im able to conclusively comment on sol.


What are you waiting on buddy?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 11:18 GMT
#2730
On August 14 2013 20:15 Koshi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2013 20:09 kushm4sta wrote:
Suck it acro house tyrell has a new lord

town has 6 deaths. dnu. at some point there are going to be less people and even you could start contributing if you are town. If you are scum, grtz on your new meta.

btw endgame I am going to make a post about "meta" because it got Oats killed. Because Oats didn't play like his townie self to protect his medic role to get sniped. But everybody yelling Oats is town made Oats contribute even less. At least that's how I see it now and I hope Oats explains his play endgame as well.
But to give you a small teaser:
stfu about meta


meta is the only reason you haven't been lynched yet, pretty sure.

Also:
On August 14 2013 19:46 Koshi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2013 19:45 Dandel Ion wrote:
We should lynch Vivax today.

Vivax his meta is not posting as scum?


Hypocrite.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 11:23 GMT
#2735
On August 14 2013 20:21 Koshi wrote:
That was an inside joke to DI. Because in the last 10 PMs we ahve sent to each other he yelled META around 250 times.

But please pick on these posts of mine please. It makes you look good and me bad!


I'm just trying to stop you from shitting up the thread. You're being worse than rayn.
Why would jkirby be a target for the lords when he just got replaced with (what appears to be) a competent player?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 11:44 GMT
#2739
A very strong townread on johnny? How?
Did your hp check get used despite getting roleblocked?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 14:40 GMT
#2782
I'm gonna do groceries, have dinner and then chill a bit. I'm saying this here because pms and stuff.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 17:25 GMT
#2874
On August 15 2013 02:22 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 01:15 Risen wrote:
So we have a claimed cop who didn't die last night with a red check on the clear lynch candidate for d2. Has anyone thought why there would be a one shot cop in this game when there's so many people? There isn't.

This is so simple a lynch.

I told him in private that if he wasn't roleblocked or killed, he was scum. He has claimed roleblocked. I don't see a third roleblocked claim.

The way the roleblock claims have worked out, it seems unlikely they are fake and it seems unlikely a town JK blocked him. So he was blocked by scum. Seems legit to me.


+1

Also, ##Unvote
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 17:50 GMT
#2894
On August 15 2013 02:34 Vivax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 02:25 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:22 Acrofales wrote:
On August 15 2013 01:15 Risen wrote:
So we have a claimed cop who didn't die last night with a red check on the clear lynch candidate for d2. Has anyone thought why there would be a one shot cop in this game when there's so many people? There isn't.

This is so simple a lynch.

I told him in private that if he wasn't roleblocked or killed, he was scum. He has claimed roleblocked. I don't see a third roleblocked claim.

The way the roleblock claims have worked out, it seems unlikely they are fake and it seems unlikely a town JK blocked him. So he was blocked by scum. Seems legit to me.


+1

Also, ##Unvote


Never seen scum roleblockers withhold their RB and let their teammates claim it?
+ Show Spoiler +
I did it


You have no way of knowing if the roleblock was fake.
Explain why it's unlikely that they are, or why it shouldn't have been a JK.

You should go with what's in the thread.
Sharrant doesn't post the stuff he should post, if he was town, this is like my third or fourth game with him, and I know how he plays town, this isn't it.

But keep thinking that scum never busses like that, that's what they want.


Ofcourse I've seen it. When Acro says unlikely he means exactly that, unlikely.
Could sharrant be scum? Yeah. Is he scum? Dunno, probably not.
Should we lynch him today? NO WTF WHAT A DUMBASS QUESTION
If he's scum they have to continue withholding roleblocks, there's like 4 or 5 more scum most likely, why lynch the cop who gave us a redcheck that turned out to be right?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 17:56 GMT
#2901
Yeah about that. I have a townread on acro. I'm warming up to an snb lynch though Risen. How do you feel about that?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 18:13 GMT
#2915
On August 15 2013 03:08 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Koshi has done the most towniest thing in thread today, I already questioned people about it and noone was able to see it. :/


Rather than asking us about it, which does NOTHING but increase your post count by one, how about you tell us?
Like, I saw your post and ignored it figuring you'd eventually just get to the point. But now you just +1'd your +1 post.
And I think you're town ffs.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 18:16 GMT
#2918
On August 15 2013 03:14 Dandel Ion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 03:07 Acrofales wrote:
Risen: GAIS. I HAVE A CONNECTION CASE THAT MAKES ACRO SCUM
Guys: But you're connecting him to an unflipped guy who is probably town
Risen: HRMM, MAYBE. BUT LETS LYNCH HIM AND THEN FOLLOW THE CONNECTION BACKWARDS!

Sounds like a good plan to me


Dandel please do something useful rather than just popping in randomly to attempt to be witty.
How do you feel about an snb lynch today?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 18:24 GMT
#2935
On August 15 2013 03:21 Risen wrote:
Xatalos just scum slipped in PMs.

##unvote
##vote: Xatalos


Detaills please? (I'm gonna guess it's something you're blowing outta proportion or just looking at in the wrong way, like most of your reads this game)
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 18:28 GMT
#2941
My head hurts.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 19:19 GMT
#2977
snb asked me in a pm why I think he's scum, and asked me to answer either in pm or thread, he doesn't seem happy with the "he's not doing anything" reason. So here it is, why snb is scum:

1) Low activity. It CAN be town, but it's more likely to be disinterested scum.
2) After being lord d1 snb suddenly does not want to be lord d2. He tells both me and oats the exact same phrase in pms "I want to run for lord n3 again, I want to re-earn my obv-towniness from n0"
3) Broken promises. This ties into point 2. He has not re-earned his "obv-towniness" at all. d2 he didn't do much, that's simply how it is. He had no presence in the thread at all, nor im pms.

How about d3 you ask? He's pushed risen real hard you say?
Let's look at his main post on risen shall we.
+ Show Spoiler +
On August 13 2013 01:45 strongandbig wrote:
So here's what I want to talk about - why has Risen been getting a pass today? I don't even care about him being lord. It sounds completely reasonable that he would be chosen since his house was worried Rayne would die (although it seems like a better plan would have been for three to vote Rayne and Risen to vote himself, that way if Ryan dies Risen would be the next lord automatically). Anyway, we should be pressuring Risen for what's in his filter.

(1) The big entry post - I talked some about this before, but it's total bullshit.
He attacked Oats, Yamato, and DI for playing anti-town, shitting up the thread, fighting over nothing, etc. The problem is, this is exactly what they do EVERY GAME. Oats argues over stupid things, Yamato is touchy as fuck, and DI is the most anti-town town player possible. They are the very definition of easy targets for scum to attack exactly like Risen did - but Risen should have known better than to call them scum and push for their lynch off of it.

(aside:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 03:27 Risen wrote:Oats is scum, Yamato is null The funny thing is that prior to looking into the filters I thought Yamato would come across as more scummy than Oats, and gave kush a pass while reading through because of that.
Connection theory! Reads like scum not wanting to either attack their buddy or directly defending them. Although Yamato is super touchy, it is more out of character for him to take a fight so far in the fucking-the-thread direction than it is for Oats to do so, and Risen doesn't actually give any reasons why he thinks Yamato is a better scum target than Oats, he just asserts that his filter looks better.)

In that post, he also calls Xatalos scum based on what boils down in part to a connection theory with his bullshit read on DI. Connection theories with unflipped (or un-scumclaimed) players? Okay, can be done by town, but shouldn't, another easy way for scum to generate reads.

Another thing - just look at that post in general. It's huge, so he must be town right? (just ask austinmcc!) Nope, wrong! A large part of the post is stream-of-consciousness, much easier to write than an actual structured case. Also it's a list-post, shorter reads on large numbers of people, easy for scum to do and looks big. Most of the reads in the post are "easy reads" for scum to make, attacking people for playing in an anti-town fashion rather than for actually being scum and attacking other people for invented reasons. A lot of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

The rest of his posting shows much less effort put into analyzing the game. An example is how Clarity is still his preferred lynch target in his final posts before N1, despite a lot more information being put into the thread and a lot more public discussion among the principals of that situation. He hasn't made any real cases since his first post, and he hasn't actually followed up on his DI, xatalos, or grackaroni reads. From the clear and huge difference in effort between his first post and the rest of his filter, it's clear that his first post was very much constructed and careful, which imo is a scum thing to do; additionally, the fact that he was careful and put effort into just writing that post makes it even more suspect that his reads in it were so obviously bad in such a specifically scummy way.

So yeah, what I want to hear next is from people who've been in PMs with Risen, whether he's given more to them in terms of reads, cases, and indications that he's actually thinking carefully about the game than he has been in the thread.



First off, the first paragraph about risen getting lord is immediately wrong. during n2, Only rayn and risen were alive when they had to vote for lord, yet snb doesn't know this? He's mentioning 3 vote for one and one the other. He thought all 4 members of that house were alive? This indicates snb is clearly not paying attention to this game.

The first three paragraphs are all on his opening list post that EVERYONE AND THEIR MOTHER agreed was terrible. Why are you analyzing it snb? To make your case four times as big as it needed to be, perhaps? Big cases carry more weight, right?

Then there's the last bit:
The rest of his posting shows much less effort put into analyzing the game. An example is how Clarity is still his preferred lynch target in his final posts before N1, despite a lot more information being put into the thread and a lot more public discussion among the principals of that situation. He hasn't made any real cases since his first post, and he hasn't actually followed up on his DI, xatalos, or grackaroni reads. From the clear and huge difference in effort between his first post and the rest of his filter, it's clear that his first post was very much constructed and careful, which imo is a scum thing to do; additionally, the fact that he was careful and put effort into just writing that post makes it even more suspect that his reads in it were so obviously bad in such a specifically scummy way.


Notice how snb's case on risen is comprised entirely of Risen's day 1 and nothing else.

Yes, at the end of day 1 he still wanted to lynch me. But guess what? He eventually did change his mind on me and grack.
I doubt snb was even aware of it, but if he was then clearly he didn't care to mention it, because it would make his case less compelling.

AND

4) snb only shows up in thread when he's under pressure. When he's not under pressure he's nowhere to be found.

##Vote strongandbig
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 19:21 GMT
#2979
On August 15 2013 04:17 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 04:12 raynpelikoneet wrote:
You fucking called me out on D2 for "not doing shit". Now you are calling me out for not doing shit. I wanted to be lord on D2, i wanted to be lord on D3. If i had not consolidated our house would have not a lord at all. wtf are you talking about Acro. You are full of shit.

Maybe if you did shit, I wouldn't call you out for not doing shit.

Still waiting for Risen's assessment of you. You claim to have PM'd a lot with him, but he hasn't responded. Maybe you did really want to be lord and were just being cockblocked. Why can't you stand up to a bully like Risen? Seems pretty simple from where I'm standing.


Acro please just skim through rayn's filter during titanic (he was town) and then come back, and let us know if you still believe he's scum.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 19:31 GMT
#2987
On August 15 2013 04:29 strongandbig wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 04:19 Clarity_nl wrote:
snb asked me in a pm why I think he's scum, and asked me to answer either in pm or thread, he doesn't seem happy with the "he's not doing anything" reason. So here it is, why snb is scum:

1) Low activity. It CAN be town, but it's more likely to be disinterested scum.
2) After being lord d1 snb suddenly does not want to be lord d2. He tells both me and oats the exact same phrase in pms "I want to run for lord n3 again, I want to re-earn my obv-towniness from n0"
3) Broken promises. This ties into point 2. He has not re-earned his "obv-towniness" at all. d2 he didn't do much, that's simply how it is. He had no presence in the thread at all, nor im pms.

How about d3 you ask? He's pushed risen real hard you say?
Let's look at his main post on risen shall we.
+ Show Spoiler +
On August 13 2013 01:45 strongandbig wrote:
So here's what I want to talk about - why has Risen been getting a pass today? I don't even care about him being lord. It sounds completely reasonable that he would be chosen since his house was worried Rayne would die (although it seems like a better plan would have been for three to vote Rayne and Risen to vote himself, that way if Ryan dies Risen would be the next lord automatically). Anyway, we should be pressuring Risen for what's in his filter.

(1) The big entry post - I talked some about this before, but it's total bullshit.
He attacked Oats, Yamato, and DI for playing anti-town, shitting up the thread, fighting over nothing, etc. The problem is, this is exactly what they do EVERY GAME. Oats argues over stupid things, Yamato is touchy as fuck, and DI is the most anti-town town player possible. They are the very definition of easy targets for scum to attack exactly like Risen did - but Risen should have known better than to call them scum and push for their lynch off of it.

(aside:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 03:27 Risen wrote:Oats is scum, Yamato is null The funny thing is that prior to looking into the filters I thought Yamato would come across as more scummy than Oats, and gave kush a pass while reading through because of that.
Connection theory! Reads like scum not wanting to either attack their buddy or directly defending them. Although Yamato is super touchy, it is more out of character for him to take a fight so far in the fucking-the-thread direction than it is for Oats to do so, and Risen doesn't actually give any reasons why he thinks Yamato is a better scum target than Oats, he just asserts that his filter looks better.)

In that post, he also calls Xatalos scum based on what boils down in part to a connection theory with his bullshit read on DI. Connection theories with unflipped (or un-scumclaimed) players? Okay, can be done by town, but shouldn't, another easy way for scum to generate reads.

Another thing - just look at that post in general. It's huge, so he must be town right? (just ask austinmcc!) Nope, wrong! A large part of the post is stream-of-consciousness, much easier to write than an actual structured case. Also it's a list-post, shorter reads on large numbers of people, easy for scum to do and looks big. Most of the reads in the post are "easy reads" for scum to make, attacking people for playing in an anti-town fashion rather than for actually being scum and attacking other people for invented reasons. A lot of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

The rest of his posting shows much less effort put into analyzing the game. An example is how Clarity is still his preferred lynch target in his final posts before N1, despite a lot more information being put into the thread and a lot more public discussion among the principals of that situation. He hasn't made any real cases since his first post, and he hasn't actually followed up on his DI, xatalos, or grackaroni reads. From the clear and huge difference in effort between his first post and the rest of his filter, it's clear that his first post was very much constructed and careful, which imo is a scum thing to do; additionally, the fact that he was careful and put effort into just writing that post makes it even more suspect that his reads in it were so obviously bad in such a specifically scummy way.

So yeah, what I want to hear next is from people who've been in PMs with Risen, whether he's given more to them in terms of reads, cases, and indications that he's actually thinking carefully about the game than he has been in the thread.



First off, the first paragraph about risen getting lord is immediately wrong. during n2, Only rayn and risen were alive when they had to vote for lord, yet snb doesn't know this? He's mentioning 3 vote for one and one the other. He thought all 4 members of that house were alive? This indicates snb is clearly not paying attention to this game.

The first three paragraphs are all on his opening list post that EVERYONE AND THEIR MOTHER agreed was terrible. Why are you analyzing it snb? To make your case four times as big as it needed to be, perhaps? Big cases carry more weight, right?

Then there's the last bit:
The rest of his posting shows much less effort put into analyzing the game. An example is how Clarity is still his preferred lynch target in his final posts before N1, despite a lot more information being put into the thread and a lot more public discussion among the principals of that situation. He hasn't made any real cases since his first post, and he hasn't actually followed up on his DI, xatalos, or grackaroni reads. From the clear and huge difference in effort between his first post and the rest of his filter, it's clear that his first post was very much constructed and careful, which imo is a scum thing to do; additionally, the fact that he was careful and put effort into just writing that post makes it even more suspect that his reads in it were so obviously bad in such a specifically scummy way.


Notice how snb's case on risen is comprised entirely of Risen's day 1 and nothing else.

Yes, at the end of day 1 he still wanted to lynch me. But guess what? He eventually did change his mind on me and grack.
I doubt snb was even aware of it, but if he was then clearly he didn't care to mention it, because it would make his case less compelling.

AND

4) snb only shows up in thread when he's under pressure. When he's not under pressure he's nowhere to be found.

##Vote strongandbig


when have i not been under pressure since i came back. how can i show up when i'm not under pressure.


I dunno....

How about....

THE ENTIRETY OF DAY 2
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 19:41 GMT
#2993
On August 15 2013 04:35 strongandbig wrote:
why would i want to be lord d2 when i knew i wouldn't be active on sunday.

how am i supposed to prove that i'm townie when idiots keep calling for me to be shot and i have to spend all my time defending myself.

and it's straight up not true that everyone thought that list post was terrible. for example, iamperfection told me that risen was town just because of that post, because he thoguht scum risen would never put that much effort into a post. i had to explain why that post was scummy so i could counteract that argument.

and of course my case is comprised of risen's day one he posted like three one-liners on day 2!

Your case boils down to "you disagree with my case on risen and you don't like that I've had to defend myself all the time after I got back."

Well let me ask you a few things.
(1) What happened to your "strong town read" on me after day 1? Do you think I would have been that active as scum in PMs and then suddenly decided I didn't care anymore?
(2) I was practically yamato's ONLY REAL PUSH. Do you think if we were on a scum team together he would have been pushing me, for the EXACT SAME REASONS you are pushing me for now - inactivity and "not caring", when he would have known I would be away and not defend myself for several days? Seriously?


1) it.. like... went away or something, I dunno.
2) He was pushing you d1. You were around d1, nor were you under any threat of being lynched. He didn't push you d2 he was too busy posting baby seals and shit. So you're misrepresenting stuff now.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 19:45 GMT
#2998
Wait, yeah you did post that on day 2... I made a mistake, I'm explaining how there's only 2 people in that house, when at that time there were 3. You thought it was 4 though so I guess you were still wrong too. Are you sure you read my case, though?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 19:47 GMT
#2999
I'll be back in a couple of hours, and I'll go to bed shortly after I'm back.
Am curious to hear grack's points.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 21:30 GMT
#3050
@ Acro, it really was the fact that he pushed yamato so hard in pms. He tried to get snb to shoot yamato as well and he had good arguments and reasoning. As I said in my deathpost it was his only redeeming quality, although with vivax' recent posts I actually feel more comfortable that if one of snb/vivax is scum, it's snb.

@snb, stop saying you're not scum and scumhunt. Make a list. Do something that makes you look townie. Screaming that you're town accomplishes nothing, and blaming the lack of scumhunting on pressure is what I did in my first scumgame.
You think risen and vivax are scum. Who else?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 22:15 GMT
#3058
Pretty sure we're finishing you off unless you become useful today, kush.

@ snb, I'm not quite sure when I said you weren't active in pms d2 specifically.
Yamato pushing you could mean anything, doesn't prove you town.

3rd post isn't even me, that's xata...
Risen however is an easy target, and vivax has been a popular person to push this game, so it's not hard seeing scum going for those two.

Really though, scumhunt please. Make a list post.. anything but more posts of you saying "but I'm town"
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 22:34 GMT
#3060
On August 15 2013 07:33 kushm4sta wrote:
k gg then. you guiz are nubs because im obv town.


So you're confirming that you won't be useful today?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 22:34 GMT
#3061
By today I mean this daycycle.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 22:45 GMT
#3065
On August 15 2013 07:41 kushm4sta wrote:
not going to be useful underthreat of being shot.
if im not useful enough i will be shot and all my work will be for nothing. so im not taking that chance. this is why you dont threaten useless people. gg kush out ur bad im hella town u suk bad etc


I see a contradiction.
Are you telling me that you would have been useful had you not been under threat of being shot?
Do you believe that if we ignored all the useless people and lynched all the useful people that that would yield better results?

I don't understand what you get out of playing this game kush.
I feel like all you do every game you play is lower the bar.
Why are you here?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 14 2013 22:46 GMT
#3066
On August 15 2013 07:43 strongandbig wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 07:15 Clarity_nl wrote:
Pretty sure we're finishing you off unless you become useful today, kush.

@ snb, I'm not quite sure when I said you weren't active in pms d2 specifically.
Yamato pushing you could mean anything, doesn't prove you town.

3rd post isn't even me, that's xata...
Risen however is an easy target, and vivax has been a popular person to push this game, so it's not hard seeing scum going for those two.

Really though, scumhunt please. Make a list post.. anything but more posts of you saying "but I'm town"

nah, i'm going home soon. i'll post more tomorrow.

PS my posts aren't "but i'm town", they're "your reasons for thinking i'm scum are stupid and you should feel bad." big difference.

PPS
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 04:19 Clarity_nl wrote:
3) d2 he didn't do much, that's simply how it is. He had no presence in the thread at all, nor im pms.


What I'm saying here is that you had no presence period. I'm not pointing out "well he wasn't active in pms d2 so hurr durr"
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 11:19 GMT
#3147
I will take any timeslot that is more than 8 hours before nightpost.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 11:36 GMT
#3151
Basically what I've done at this point is ignore risen's day 1, and looked at the rest.

Sharrant and rayn aren't the most outrageous targets. I think he's had his vote on like 4 people so far today and everytime he says "yes, this is the person we're lynching, keeping my vote here"
I would like it if Risen got his vote back on snb, though, rather than have his vote on sharrant who is not getting lynched today.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 11:38 GMT
#3152
On August 15 2013 20:36 Mocsta wrote:
xat.... di filter is such a birch to read.. as he actually pushed anyone as scum

or is his filter just complaining about the lord nominations and then afk lurking?

I don't recall him pushing anyone , but I'm happy to be proven wrong


Koshi day 1, pretty hard.
That's all I recall though, without looking at his filter.

I think I've seen dandel do this in his towngames though. People call him town so he goes "right, time to troll and be useless"
Problem is, it's too easy to replicate as scum.
THAT SAID, he has posted reads (without reasons) and I've mostly agreed with them.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 12:01 GMT
#3155
I guess, but I mean, he pushed real hard. I'm concerned about his activity too though.
This is worth bringing up again d4, but I think today we should focus on the lynch at hand.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 12:07 GMT
#3157
Where do you think the lord kp should go mocsta? We have an idea of our own but outsider perspectives are cool, right?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 12:14 GMT
#3159
kush is damaged (lords shot him last night), although we don't know how much hp he has left. Do you think we should finish him off first?
If we ignored kush and focus fired on vivax and he didn't die, would you still want to lynch him the next daycycle?

I'll be back later today.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 12:34 GMT
#3161
Obvious question: why do you think kush is town?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 12:53 GMT
#3163
On August 15 2013 21:44 Mocsta wrote:
I just played with a scum kush and pegged him instantly.

unless he is being coached with what to say; hes playing completely different.

Yes, kush did support a yamato lynch; but i felt it wasnt brought up in a "im right" kinda way.

His filter to me, reads as very unconfident, and thats a town kush as far as im concerned.

Thing is, i dont expect scum to finish him off.. because whats the point?
Its far more valuable for town to waste a lynch (which completely kills someone regardless of how many hp they have)
i.e if scum have 7hp like town seem to have; then 6 town lords cant kill scum in 1 night. so yeah..


The bolded is an argument to shoot kush, not to keep him alive.

It can't be that farfetched that if kush rolled scum, the first thing his scummates posted in the qt is "don't hard push any of us, just say random shit and be useless and people will have a townread on you
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 13:03 GMT
#3165
On August 15 2013 21:57 Mocsta wrote:
yeah; but thats giving a lot of respect to Kush.

Unfortunately, he doesnt even deserve that level of respect... seriously.. read the scum qt for "sicilian' mafia lol

If you really have that much doubt in kush.. sure shoot him.. but last i checked, the concept of the game was to lynch scum; not clear rid of bad townies.


I agree we won't to shoot scum, but I don't understand how you can have such a strong read on him.
My issue is this, if he is scum and we just go "yeah whatever kush is kush" what happens when/if we get to lylo?

You sound confident in the read though, I'll check out sicilian scum qt later. (note how in sicilian obs qt I called kush scum cause he was right about stuff)
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 14:43 GMT
#3216
Acro, from memory you're quoting a bunch of different people, yet the way you quote is doesn't say who is who.

I can answer one thing: the xata quote "Out of tue lords I have spoken with I am getting heavy town feelings from clarity, xata, chrome ans s0L." His following post said "I meant sharrant, not chrom"
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 14:51 GMT
#3225
Mocsta, stop... regardless of your alignment.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 15:26 GMT
#3239
On August 16 2013 00:11 Mocsta wrote:
Clarity. since you are/were here... s0lstice responded to your query..

were you satisfied?

(pun intended)


Yeah my time with him in pms definitely has made my scumread disappear. That said I don't have the strongest townread on him either but I don't want to lynch him anymore, at least today.

I'm kind of underwhelmed by solstice and sharrant their thread presence though... Would be nice if they would fall in line and vote for snb.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 16:23 GMT
#3247
On August 16 2013 01:21 kushm4sta wrote:
i literally skim the thread for mentions of my name.


Why? nvm... I don't actually want to know.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 16:46 GMT
#3260
On August 16 2013 01:41 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 16 2013 01:37 kushm4sta wrote:
-he ignores yamato

This is a point that needs further discussion.

Several in the thread ignored the oats/yamato fighting, or tried to write it off as two townies duking it out(e.g. Acrofales)

Does this make them scummy?


I dunno. Depends if you think I'm scum?
I mean, I never called em both town for it or anything but I don't think I ever even commented on it.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 17:02 GMT
#3268
Acro, especially his d3 and onwards is just a shitstorm. The major similarity is the questions he asks. Maybe from reading his filter it doesn't come across, but most of them were completely useless. Either the answer was readily available for those who looked or the answer was gonna be useless regardless.
That is your main problem with rayn is it not?

btw, snb just said his scum meta is to push oats, and now acro just said his town meta is to push oats.
I don't believe in either one since that would be a terrible thing to do, push one person consistently as a particular alignment, but why the difference?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 17:09 GMT
#3271
sicilian, he got caught because he dayvigged someone and claimed town dayvig though, his target was a weird shot for a townie to make
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 17:51 GMT
#3289
On August 16 2013 02:38 Risen wrote:
I'd rather kill Vivax over SnB, folks. Too much willingness to kill SnB and he has literally had like 0 defenders the entire game. Lot of Vivax apologists, though.


Might be a product of the game format.

I think 5 of the 6 lords currently are likely town. That doesn't mean I think one of them specifically is scum but the votes are all town.

The reason I've defended vivax a bit really is because his n1 pushing of yamato.
At one point he told me he had convinced snb that yamato would be a good shot, and he wanted me to ask snb who he'd think was a good shot, to see if he'd mention yamato.

When I did, snb said "I'm just going along with iamp's plan of shooting gumshoe" without giving his own opinion.
When I pressed and said something like "so you're claiming no responsibility in the outcome? btw vivax told me you agreed on yamato" snb said "yeah, I do agree with the plan, can't change it now since it's night so am shooting gumshoe, but yamato wouldn't be a bad shot"

Lots of paraphrasing to hopefully that made sense. I'm not saying it because I believe that makes snb scummy, I'm saying it because I believe it makes vivax more likely to be town.

I have had a bunch of interactions with both players and I believe that they can't both be scum together.
I think snb is scummier than vivax. I wanna kill snb.

If snb keeps contributing like he has today (I liked the dandel post) I might be willing to yolo lynch dandel, though.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 18:03 GMT
#3294
On August 16 2013 03:00 s0Lstice wrote:
Let's talk about that yamato vivax thing.

Going after yamato in PMs means what exactly. At the end of D1, yamato look pretty clearly bad. The scum team had to recognize this just like the rest of us did. How much credit do we assign Vivax for pushing to make yamato take...1 HP damage? This would be irrelevant just by itself, but even more so if yamato is looking like a lynch tomorrow anyway.


I was arguing back at vivax that yamato was null in my eyes.
Hell, oats was trying to convince me yamato was town during n1!

I was one of the few people that had no clear opinion on yamato, and vivax tried to convince me he's scum. Why?
A yamato lynch was nowhere near a certainty d2 without the redcheck. Scum could have easily tried to direct the lynch elsewhere.
The only reason a scum vivax would do that is if sharrant was scum too and vivax knew the redcheck was going to happen, and I don't buy that.

It's not a perfect explanation, I'm not saying vivax is completely town because of it, but it makes him townier than snb, and as I've said they can't both be scum.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 18:06 GMT
#3295
On August 16 2013 03:02 strongandbig wrote:
One other thing: during n2 the only PM vivax sent me about Yamato was basically "what do you think of my case on koshi and oberyn's case on yamato." then in the same PM he asked me a few other questions about my reads on acro and onegu. But he didn't actually try to persuade me at all. IDK what he told you about that exchange but what actually persuaded me on yamato were the points other people made in the thread about how we had to drag reads and contribution out of him like pulling teeth, plus the fact that I thought his push on me was very bad and made me angry at him.


Hmm.. I'm gonna go re-read some pms then.

I wasn't trying to imply that you shouldn't have shot gumshoe btw, but the fact that when I asked you who you thought were good shots your answer was "we're shooting gumshoe because that was their plan"
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 18:09 GMT
#3296
Yeah, Vivax literally says "I think I might have convinced [snb] to shoot yammo tonight"
Then he asks me to talk to snb without revealing I talked to him to see if snb mentions yamato.

snb, you're saying
One other thing: during n2 the only PM vivax sent me about Yamato was basically "what do you think of my case on koshi and oberyn's case on yamato." then in the same PM he asked me a few other questions about my reads on acro and onegu. But he didn't actually try to persuade me at all. IDK what he told you about that exchange but what actually persuaded me on yamato were the points other people made in the thread about how we had to drag reads and contribution out of him like pulling teeth, plus the fact that I thought his push on me was very bad and made me angry at him.


This is all correct?

Yamato are you around, can you explain this?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 18:11 GMT
#3297
We're talking n1 snb, btw. But I assume that's what you meant seeing as yamato was dead n2.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 18:11 GMT
#3299
Sup dandel, who do you wanna lynch between snb/vivax, and why shouldn't we shoot you tonight for being a sack of potatoes?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 18:13 GMT
#3301
See I thought that and then slowly I started thinking...
Wait, that's not a sack of balls, that's a sack of potatoes!
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 18:17 GMT
#3303
On August 16 2013 03:14 s0Lstice wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 16 2013 03:03 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 16 2013 03:00 s0Lstice wrote:
Let's talk about that yamato vivax thing.

Going after yamato in PMs means what exactly. At the end of D1, yamato look pretty clearly bad. The scum team had to recognize this just like the rest of us did. How much credit do we assign Vivax for pushing to make yamato take...1 HP damage? This would be irrelevant just by itself, but even more so if yamato is looking like a lynch tomorrow anyway.


I was arguing back at vivax that yamato was null in my eyes.
Hell, oats was trying to convince me yamato was town during n1!

I was one of the few people that had no clear opinion on yamato, and vivax tried to convince me he's scum. Why?
A yamato lynch was nowhere near a certainty d2 without the redcheck. Scum could have easily tried to direct the lynch elsewhere.
The only reason a scum vivax would do that is if sharrant was scum too and vivax knew the redcheck was going to happen, and I don't buy that.

It's not a perfect explanation, I'm not saying vivax is completely town because of it, but it makes him townier than snb, and as I've said they can't both be scum.


Why couldn't scum do this? I bussed fuba and stutters all game in Basterd Mini because I knew I wasn't putting them in real danger. How damaging is it to yamato for Vivax to make you go from null to scum on him? Not very. It only gets easier to rule it out as a scum on scum interaction if Vivax was here in thread pushing yamato's lynch with force when it was unpopular and seeing it through to the end, and even then you can never be sure

Yamato was basically a good bus. If I was scum I'd have probably bussed the shit out of him towards the end of Day 1.

I just don't see those PMs being conclusive either way.


I think there was a small chance of yamato getting lynched pre redcheck.
I think had vivax convinced me there would have been a much much bigger chance.
See no reason to do it as scum, especially since only I would give him towniepoints for it and no one else.

That said, this pm stuff snb pointed out looks pretty bad for vivax, maybe, let's see if he shows up.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 18:28 GMT
#3307
I think sharrant and acro have both said johnny looks town from pms? As I said in my list post he looks scum to me but it's that that is holding me back.
snb did a nice dissection of why his thread stuff looks scum, although the house list really isn't indicative of anything, it was asked for.

So I guess I'd like to hear more from sharrant and acro first.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 18:44 GMT
#3317
##Summon Vivax
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 19:52 GMT
#3346
1-5 EDT Xatalos

5-9 EDT Clarity?

9-13 EDT Clarity?

13-17 EDT Clarity?

17-21 EDT

21-1 EDT Onegu
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 19:52 GMT
#3350
ninjad

1-5 EDT Xatalos

5-9 EDT Clarity?

9-13 EDT s0lstice

13-17 EDT Clarity?

17-21 EDT

21-1 EDT Onegu
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 19:54 GMT
#3353
Clarity?

I'll take either one is my point. So whoever wants one of those two just take it put me in the other.
Acro's case is reasonable, I'm fine with keeping my vote on snb, it is the wagon of justice after all.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 20:04 GMT
#3359
I'll take the 13-17 slot actually
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 20:21 GMT
#3370
Yeah the claim doesn't actually change anything....

Calling people who play mafia tryhards is also pretty silly. Kinda torn..
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 20:25 GMT
#3376
On August 16 2013 05:22 Dandel Ion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 16 2013 05:21 Clarity_nl wrote:
Yeah the claim doesn't actually change anything....

Calling people who play mafia tryhards is also pretty silly. Kinda torn..

torn between what?

he clearly needs rope
survivor claim with no given option on who would be scum instead of him?
yea, no.


it's a jailer claim though. Obviously he could just be a goon who knows who scum roleblocked... but if he's a jailer scum will have to roleblock or kill him, no?
The fact that he gives us no scumreads and just kinda gives up makes sense if he is survivor, not so much if he is scum.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 20:27 GMT
#3378
Like, this claim makes NO SENSE for scum to make. Why not just claim town jailer? He can make the argument that he didn't want to get lynched.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 20:27 GMT
#3380
erm, shot I mean
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 20:31 GMT
#3383
Yeah but as scum you can fake contribute and shit and try to get a mislynch to happen, then die the next day with little discussion.
As survivor you give up since there's no way you're living till endgame when you have this much pressure on you d3.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 20:44 GMT
#3389
I'm trying to figure out if lynching vivax is the correct play. Xata you say you agree he's more likely survivor jailer than scum, right?

Let's say he's 100% survivor jailer, should we lynch him?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 20:50 GMT
#3397
On August 16 2013 05:47 Dandel Ion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 16 2013 05:44 Clarity_nl wrote:
I'm trying to figure out if lynching vivax is the correct play. Xata you say you agree he's more likely survivor jailer than scum, right?

Let's say he's 100% survivor jailer, should we lynch him?

as confirmed not-town, it would be his place to answer why we shouldn't lynch him.

he didn't and doesn't



it's ez, really.


Town win condition is to kill all scum, yes? Scum win condition is to kill people till they outnumber everyone else.
How does lynching a survivor help town win condition?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 20:50 GMT
#3398
On August 16 2013 05:50 Xatalos wrote:
Who besides me was RB'd N1?


me
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 20:55 GMT
#3407
On August 16 2013 05:53 Dandel Ion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 16 2013 05:50 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 16 2013 05:47 Dandel Ion wrote:
On August 16 2013 05:44 Clarity_nl wrote:
I'm trying to figure out if lynching vivax is the correct play. Xata you say you agree he's more likely survivor jailer than scum, right?

Let's say he's 100% survivor jailer, should we lynch him?

as confirmed not-town, it would be his place to answer why we shouldn't lynch him.

he didn't and doesn't



it's ez, really.


Town win condition is to kill all scum, yes? Scum win condition is to kill people till they outnumber everyone else.
How does lynching a survivor help town win condition?

lol i just checked and according to the OP, town needs to eliminate all "non-town"

lol
lol
lol


Oh, okay. Cool.

##Vote Vivax
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 20:58 GMT
#3413
Makes it much more likely that vivax is a traitor rather than survivor.
I can't say I've seen a game where a survivor exists yet the town goal is to eliminate all non-town.

Nice job dandel, but to quote palmar (try to read in an icelandic accent) "If you read the OP you are a noooowbie"
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 21:01 GMT
#3418
On August 16 2013 05:59 Dandel Ion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 16 2013 05:58 Clarity_nl wrote:
Makes it much more likely that vivax is a traitor rather than survivor.
I can't say I've seen a game where a survivor exists yet the town goal is to eliminate all non-town.

Nice job dandel, but to quote palmar (try to read in an icelandic accent) "If you read the OP you are a noooowbie"

better than being an idiot


AYAYAYAY




Dandel, that's just mean.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 21:03 GMT
#3420
On August 16 2013 06:02 Dandel Ion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 16 2013 06:01 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 16 2013 05:59 Dandel Ion wrote:
On August 16 2013 05:58 Clarity_nl wrote:
Makes it much more likely that vivax is a traitor rather than survivor.
I can't say I've seen a game where a survivor exists yet the town goal is to eliminate all non-town.

Nice job dandel, but to quote palmar (try to read in an icelandic accent) "If you read the OP you are a noooowbie"

better than being an idiot


AYAYAYAY




Dandel, that's just mean.

you're just jelly I'm able to read the OP

in contrast to...
well
everybody else in this game it seems
#sweg


What is read?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 21:09 GMT
#3425
Anyway, good lynch guys. Feels like we got shit done today.

I'm not salty that dandel solved vivax btw. Not salty at all.
Good job, Dandel.

Ok so before I go to bed:
Lords should shoot kush till dead, then the rest goes to johnny.
JUST TO BE SAFE we should have a third target, in case johnny gets replaced or modkilled or something. I'll leave that to you guys though.

Make sure to make deathposts during the night, send em to whoevers left in your house.
If there's only 2 people in a house, and 1 dies and the other posts his deathpost SCRUTINIZE IT, could be a scum fake. Not likely but worth looking at.

Night guys!
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 21:12 GMT
#3428
On August 16 2013 06:10 Xatalos wrote:
I'm very glad we chose Vivax over snb. Although could snb also be scum? I don't think anyone even opposed his lynch? Or did someone? Feels a bit weird to have 2 scum as the choices for today though. If Vivax is some other anti-town role, not so much though.

Now I'm mostly interested to hear what Risen and Sharrant have to say about the kill list. And pick times as well.


No one really defended snb but there were plenty of pushes away from snb/vivax
I just hope snb contributes more like he has today. I'll definitely want to talk to him and share reads a lot during n3.
BED NAO
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 21:14 GMT
#3433
On August 16 2013 06:13 Risen wrote:
I'll be shooting Koshi, so I don't think it matters when I shoot. Just put me in a slot.


don't shoot koshi he's town
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 21:15 GMT
#3434
I'd rather have rayn as a lord tomorrow than no lord.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 15 2013 21:15 GMT
#3435
EBWOP Rather have no lord than risen as a lord, is what I was trying to say.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 16 2013 19:29 GMT
#3630
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 06:59 GMT
#3710
Before I catch up. I voted myself and snb agreed to vote for me.
Sooooooooooooooooooooooo..... Yeah
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 07:01 GMT
#3711
Also kush died 1 cycle too late, meaning one of the first 3 didn't shoot kush (we knew kush had 3 hp)
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 07:11 GMT
#3713
On August 17 2013 14:50 Sharrant wrote:
Oh, yeah, I'll claim it. My KP went to Koshi.


Ok that's not terrible I guess.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 07:14 GMT
#3714
redcheck on mocsta... why have scum let sharrant live?
To be fair, town has been kinda steamrolling so they have to make a play I guess.. n4 three of us will likely die, and it'll be the active three.... So, solving this game, or getting close to solving this game today would be great.

If I had to guess, snb is not claiming scum and more likely forgot to vote cause he was flustered cause he messed up and posted a pm to me in thread instead. That said.... I was hoping that would mean I got 1 out of 1 votes and therefore elected...
I'll have to ask this to the hosts and see if someone doesn't a vote, what a majority means.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 07:25 GMT
#3715
So I dunno, if we lynch town scum scum town I doubt we somehow lose (although I guess we lord kped two townies)
That said mocsta's reaction is dumb, so let's just lynch him and if he flips green lynch lynch sharrant, no?

Acro, I doubt if scum has a majority they'll just wait and suddenly hammer someone cause that'll reveal the scumteam and I believe town can grab majority again tomorrow, right?
I don't know if they have a majority, but the current lord list is fucking dumb. Like, how did this happen.

grack over xata?
dandel? (to be fair their house suxxxx)
Then there's me and snb... wtf.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 07:32 GMT
#3718
On August 17 2013 16:31 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 16:25 Clarity_nl wrote:
So I dunno, if we lynch town scum scum town I doubt we somehow lose (although I guess we lord kped two townies)
That said mocsta's reaction is dumb, so let's just lynch him and if he flips green lynch lynch sharrant, no?

Acro, I doubt if scum has a majority they'll just wait and suddenly hammer someone cause that'll reveal the scumteam and I believe town can grab majority again tomorrow, right?
I don't know if they have a majority, but the current lord list is fucking dumb. Like, how did this happen.

grack over xata?
dandel? (to be fair their house suxxxx)
Then there's me and snb... wtf.

Grackaroni = best lord


I liked xata. Why are you lord?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 07:36 GMT
#3720
Here's my shitty deathpost to snb because I didn't actually re-read much yesterday:

Here's a couple of things though. Just post this blurb if I die I guess:

Xata is 95% town. If I die and you become lord he's the person you wanna bounce ideas off of.
johnny, DI, koshi and maybe even rayn are all good people to consider for lynch d4.
chrom and onegu are two people that I think if pushed you'll be able to get a read on, but currently I'm not confident in predicting their alignment.
Sharrant needs to be looked at closely. The fact that vivax flipped scum makes it more likely that sharrant is scum, since vivax bussing yamato n1 doesnt make much sense without knowing about the redcheck, I doubt scum were lining up to bus yamato without a tradeoff like getting sharrant as "confirmed town"

Also, solstice, please be active in thread, same goes for sharrant obviously..

Things worth looking at:
Figure out if acro actually pushed vivax or just merely suggested his lynch a bunch during d3.
Find out if snb continues contributing d4 or if he backs off again when pressure is off him
Read the flipped town' filters (seriously, do this)

Bolded is important.
If mocsta flips green we should lynch sharrant. mocsta is a pretty low profile check compared to more likely checks like: koshi, DI, johnny
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 07:42 GMT
#3725
On August 17 2013 16:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
lol Clarity. wtf?


people have a point. Although you are very much looking like your town meta, you are way more useless this game compared to titanic.

The attitude "I didn't have to do anything d2 and d3" is just weird for a townie.
That said you're way down the list.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 07:46 GMT
#3728
On August 17 2013 16:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 16:42 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 16:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
lol Clarity. wtf?


people have a point. Although you are very much looking like your town meta, you are way more useless this game compared to titanic.

The attitude "I didn't have to do anything d2 and d3" is just weird for a townie.
That said you're way down the list.

No, i said i didn.t have to post anything in thread. I was the fucking first person to say "Vivax dies this phase" (lol Mocsta, you suck), other than that i made a case on Mocsta (which nobody even looked at).

I was watching the game and observing. I don't post when you guys don't listen. It does no good. Start listening.


Really? Because before it was all you did when people didn't listen you just spammed the shit out of the game.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 07:48 GMT
#3729
8 hours before lynch and snb looked likely to get lynched. You were just sucking your thumb in a corner doing nothing?
Nah I don't buy it.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 07:57 GMT
#3732
On August 17 2013 16:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
SnB was going to get lynched before he did not post. SnB was not gonna get lynced when he started posting. I have a townread on him, which i might want to revisit now seeing your house does not have a lord at all.

Do you think i am not unable to learn something from a clusterfuck game like Titanic?

Also could you rephrase your PM's with Vivax from D2? Same question to SnB?
SnB also please explain why your house has no lord?

Clarity did you and SnB discuss the lord situation on N3? Did you get into an agreement of any sort?


I'm glad at least you can still ask questions to which the answer is now readily available.
On August 17 2013 15:59 Clarity_nl wrote:
Before I catch up. I voted myself and snb agreed to vote for me.
Sooooooooooooooooooooooo..... Yeah

Don't have any pms with him d2.

You had a townread on snb, he was super pressured d3. He started defending himself like 16 hours before lynch and votes weren't moving off him just yet. You're telling me you could just predict that the lynch would move off snb? Or are you saying you didn't care that your townread was up for lynch?

Holy shit your explanation makes no sense from a town perspective. Guess I've been wrong about you so far this game rayn.
Totes scum.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 08:10 GMT
#3735
Risen sent me 1 pm as far as I can recall and I replied to that.
Don't think I have pms with vivax d3 no. He wasn't very active, in case you weren't aware.

Oh, vivax did send me a pm near the end of n2 saying he'd vote for me and that he "wished he had more time to play and knows that that's no excuse"

Are you gonna get to the point?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 08:18 GMT
#3737
Because I'm scum and I've avoided all major issues in this game so far. Oh wait.

I didn't want to lynch snb over vivax when vivax "claimed scum", at the time I wasn't sure if it was a scumclaim.
No reason to switch my vote until I'm convinced.
No, I honestly don't remember anything you said d3, but I'll go look. Mocsta I think, right?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 08:20 GMT
#3739
If I had a "townread" on kush I'd probably still vigi him, to be fair. Not that I'd ever have a strong townread on kush.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 08:25 GMT
#3742
On August 17 2013 17:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Right. This is why i did not care to post. Nobody fucking reads my posts unless i am overly annoying. When i am nobody wants to read my posts. What gives?

Also Mocsta saying he pushed Vivax lynch is bullshit. He did only start pushing it after i pointed out he was okay with lynching his townread.


When you're annoying you force people to listen to you.
When you make an argument people can choose to listen to you.
It's about being convincing, and you were not. I had a townread on you and you seemed to be all over the place. I have not gone over your filter once this game.

I'm paying attention now, but you explaining why mocsta is scum after sharrant tells us he has a redcheck on mocsta seems a bit redundant. Unless you think me not paying much attention to you d3 makes me scum.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 08:27 GMT
#3744
Like, I'll look over his filter today at some point anyway. If you're right about what you said then yeah.. you probably would've convinced me today even without the redcheck.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 08:47 GMT
#3748
On August 17 2013 17:43 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 17:27 Clarity_nl wrote:
Like, I'll look over his filter today at some point anyway. If you're right about what you said then yeah.. you probably would've convinced me today even without the redcheck.

Well.. Clarity. Hes already wrong, so Im surprised you would be "convinced" so quickly.

Just thinka bout this... rayn is citing what occured in the thread.. NOT pm land.

If he wants to quote thread history.. why paraphrase instead of actually quote..

well its because hes lying.. and i proved that in the post above.

When i first started pushing vivax, i actaully thought snb was scummy; so rayn is lying out of his arse.


I said IF he's right then yeah, that looks pretty bad for you.

hosts just confirmed to me that if snb forgot to vote and I voted myself, I would not be lord.
That sucks.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 08:49 GMT
#3749
If he forgot to vote or intentionally did not vote*

Less sure about snb though.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 09:21 GMT
#3764
On August 17 2013 18:06 Onegu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 16:42 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 16:37 Onegu wrote:
I have a scum read on him so I am guessing they also do. It was discussed to have him as a house kp target, so its not a bad choice.

So you think a town roleblocker roleblocked Xatalos or Clarity N1. Why is that?



Clarity, as some people had scum reads on him day one from the whole SnB role name claim thing.

Why are you asking me this, it isnt relevant much and progresses the game no where


Another possibility. My unwillingness to share my rolename with oats might be scum thinking I'm blue.
Makes more sense to me that xata got roleblocked by scum over me, though.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 09:27 GMT
#3767
I agree with mocsta on this one. No reason to continue this line of questioning.

I also agree with onegu that my d1 was bad and it's not unlikely that a town roleblocked me.
Do you disagree with that rayn?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 09:30 GMT
#3768
On August 17 2013 17:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I said i have a townread on him, not had.
I think you might want to revisit D3 and think about your answers because i am soon gonna be pointing out something about you that makes no sense at all.

Why did you not answer Risen in PM's D3?


Is this coming, btw?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 09:37 GMT
#3773
On August 17 2013 18:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 18:30 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 17:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I said i have a townread on him, not had.
I think you might want to revisit D3 and think about your answers because i am soon gonna be pointing out something about you that makes no sense at all.

Why did you not answer Risen in PM's D3?


Is this coming, btw?

It already came. Are you again not reading my posts?
What do you think of Onegu?


What? You're talking about me not replying to risen (when I did)? That was worth telling me I should revisit the entirety of d3 because you're about to dunk me?

I think onegu might be scum, but I also think you're twisting stuff. Just because snb is the only person who pushed me d1 doesn't mean a town roleblocker who didn't push me in thread couldn't have roleblocked me.
d2 I established my townieness so I didn't get pushed then either.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 09:39 GMT
#3775
On August 17 2013 18:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 18:36 Onegu wrote:
On August 17 2013 18:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 18:26 Onegu wrote:
On August 10 2013 13:50 FirmTofu wrote:
Town Clarity is someone who has a very confident Day 1. He pressures people, attacks with authority, and backs off only when he is confident that the player he is attacking is not scum. Clarity displayed NONE of that during day 1. Clarity played rather passive and although he was relatively active, his accusations were a lot less characteristic of his town play.



Well FT posted this right before his mislynch after his flip maybe people looked at that, SnB still had a scum read on him iirc. If you really want me to Ill look more but I dont think looking for town RB is something that needs to be done right now as again it isnt relevant.


On August 16 2013 00:40 Onegu wrote:
Guess since Im the person who first pushed for a SnB lynch with the lords I should vote him


##VOTE:StrongAndBig


Firmtofu is dead. SnB had a scumread on Clarity. You think there is a town roleblocker who blocked Clarity on N1, and you on N2.

Now, why did you vote for the guy who was most likely to be the town roleblocker in your mind on D3?

I know why. Because scum!



Wow are you serious? You asked me who had scum reads on clarity, I never once said I think one of those two are town RB, there is no reason for me to try to find town RB, I was just point out a few people had scum reads on clarity so it is likely others had a scum read on him also.


Can anyone see why this post makes zero sense?


I can see why it makes 0 sense to you. You seem to have drawn a connection that the only people who might have had a scumread on me d1/n1 are the people who pushed me in thread.
PS snb called me town near the end of day 1
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 09:45 GMT
#3779
On August 17 2013 18:42 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 18:39 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 18:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 18:36 Onegu wrote:
On August 17 2013 18:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 18:26 Onegu wrote:
On August 10 2013 13:50 FirmTofu wrote:
Town Clarity is someone who has a very confident Day 1. He pressures people, attacks with authority, and backs off only when he is confident that the player he is attacking is not scum. Clarity displayed NONE of that during day 1. Clarity played rather passive and although he was relatively active, his accusations were a lot less characteristic of his town play.



Well FT posted this right before his mislynch after his flip maybe people looked at that, SnB still had a scum read on him iirc. If you really want me to Ill look more but I dont think looking for town RB is something that needs to be done right now as again it isnt relevant.


On August 16 2013 00:40 Onegu wrote:
Guess since Im the person who first pushed for a SnB lynch with the lords I should vote him


##VOTE:StrongAndBig


Firmtofu is dead. SnB had a scumread on Clarity. You think there is a town roleblocker who blocked Clarity on N1, and you on N2.

Now, why did you vote for the guy who was most likely to be the town roleblocker in your mind on D3?

I know why. Because scum!



Wow are you serious? You asked me who had scum reads on clarity, I never once said I think one of those two are town RB, there is no reason for me to try to find town RB, I was just point out a few people had scum reads on clarity so it is likely others had a scum read on him also.


Can anyone see why this post makes zero sense?


I can see why it makes 0 sense to you. You seem to have drawn a connection that the only people who might have had a scumread on me d1/n1 are the people who pushed me in thread.
PS snb called me town near the end of day 1

No, that's Onegu's thought process as he said so!!!
I am pointing out why his logic makes zero sense.


Onegu said that he believes the only people who might have a scumread on me are the people who expressed so in thread?
Come on rayn...

On August 17 2013 18:37 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 18:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 18:30 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 17:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I said i have a townread on him, not had.
I think you might want to revisit D3 and think about your answers because i am soon gonna be pointing out something about you that makes no sense at all.

Why did you not answer Risen in PM's D3?


Is this coming, btw?

It already came. Are you again not reading my posts?
What do you think of Onegu?


What? You're talking about me not replying to risen (when I did)? That was worth telling me I should revisit the entirety of d3 because you're about to dunk me?

I think onegu might be scum, but I also think you're twisting stuff. Just because snb is the only person who pushed me d1 doesn't mean a town roleblocker who didn't push me in thread couldn't have roleblocked me.
d2 I established my townieness so I didn't get pushed then either.

FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 09:49 GMT
#3781
On August 17 2013 18:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Clarity tell me how Onegu's thought process makes sense.
I'm gonna shop groceries, when i am back i am gonna tell you why it does not make sense.

be back in 15.


He thinks I got roleblocked by town because I didn't look that good day 1.
He voted snb d3 because he looked like scum and all the townie people were pushing him....

What you're trying to say is that:
1) onegu believes clarity was roleblocked by town n1
2) onegu believes that a town roleblocker would roleblock a scumread
3) snb had a scumread on clarity at the end of d1 (this isn't true but let's assume it is)
4) therefore snb was the only person with a scumread on clarity, therefore onegu MUST believe that snb is the town roleblocker.

CAN YOU SEE HOW... NOT ONEGU'S, BUT YOUR LOGIC MAKES NO SENSE

If you have a different explanation of your logic I look forward to it.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 10:13 GMT
#3783
Again. You somehow assume that onegu thinks only the people who expressed a scumread on me could have a scumread on me.

When you ask him "who had a scumread on clarity" he'll answer the people who SHOWED they had a scumread on me.
There's even a third possiblity. Onegu didn't think about who the town roleblocker is because as town it's fucking useless.
This is so fucking dumb.

Here's the saddest fucking part. Yes, onegu could be scum, and if he flips red this game you're gonna go "SEE I TOLD YOU SO" when your logic is plain WRONG.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 10:22 GMT
#3786
On August 17 2013 19:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Like seriously.
If you thought there was a town roleblocker and you thought they had a scumread on you on D1, and the only person alive who has (in your mind) expressed a scumread on you is SnB, would you or would you not think he has a big possibility of being a town roleblocker?

If you did, would you call him scum all game after that without investigating into the matter further?


Clearly not since I DID believe I was likely roleblocked by town, and I did push snb as a lynch d3.
Dork.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 10:28 GMT
#3788
I see no reason for me to get jailed n1 so I think I was roleblocked.

Here let me make a case on myself:
On August 13 2013 05:57 Clarity_nl wrote:
Doesn't really matter. Highly unlikely town would roleblock you, so the roleblock came from scum or scum withheld a roleblock to give you town cred which you already had.

So you're town. Don't really care about the rest.
Stop measuring dicks please.


CLARITY CLEARLY THINKS THAT XATA WAS ROLEBLOCKED BY SCUM, THAT MEANS HE BELIEVES HE GOT ROLEBLOCKED BY TOWN

THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO EXPRESSED A SCUMREAD ON CLARITY AND WOULD THEREFORE ROLEBLOCK HIM AS TOWN ARE FT AND SNB

FT DIED SO CLARITY MUST ASSUME THAT SNB IS TOWN ROLEBLOCKER

On August 15 2013 04:19 Clarity_nl wrote:
snb asked me in a pm why I think he's scum, and asked me to answer either in pm or thread, he doesn't seem happy with the "he's not doing anything" reason. So here it is, why snb is scum:

1) Low activity. It CAN be town, but it's more likely to be disinterested scum.
2) After being lord d1 snb suddenly does not want to be lord d2. He tells both me and oats the exact same phrase in pms "I want to run for lord n3 again, I want to re-earn my obv-towniness from n0"
3) Broken promises. This ties into point 2. He has not re-earned his "obv-towniness" at all. d2 he didn't do much, that's simply how it is. He had no presence in the thread at all, nor im pms.

How about d3 you ask? He's pushed risen real hard you say?
Let's look at his main post on risen shall we.
+ Show Spoiler +
On August 13 2013 01:45 strongandbig wrote:
So here's what I want to talk about - why has Risen been getting a pass today? I don't even care about him being lord. It sounds completely reasonable that he would be chosen since his house was worried Rayne would die (although it seems like a better plan would have been for three to vote Rayne and Risen to vote himself, that way if Ryan dies Risen would be the next lord automatically). Anyway, we should be pressuring Risen for what's in his filter.

(1) The big entry post - I talked some about this before, but it's total bullshit.
He attacked Oats, Yamato, and DI for playing anti-town, shitting up the thread, fighting over nothing, etc. The problem is, this is exactly what they do EVERY GAME. Oats argues over stupid things, Yamato is touchy as fuck, and DI is the most anti-town town player possible. They are the very definition of easy targets for scum to attack exactly like Risen did - but Risen should have known better than to call them scum and push for their lynch off of it.

(aside:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 03:27 Risen wrote:Oats is scum, Yamato is null The funny thing is that prior to looking into the filters I thought Yamato would come across as more scummy than Oats, and gave kush a pass while reading through because of that.
Connection theory! Reads like scum not wanting to either attack their buddy or directly defending them. Although Yamato is super touchy, it is more out of character for him to take a fight so far in the fucking-the-thread direction than it is for Oats to do so, and Risen doesn't actually give any reasons why he thinks Yamato is a better scum target than Oats, he just asserts that his filter looks better.)

In that post, he also calls Xatalos scum based on what boils down in part to a connection theory with his bullshit read on DI. Connection theories with unflipped (or un-scumclaimed) players? Okay, can be done by town, but shouldn't, another easy way for scum to generate reads.

Another thing - just look at that post in general. It's huge, so he must be town right? (just ask austinmcc!) Nope, wrong! A large part of the post is stream-of-consciousness, much easier to write than an actual structured case. Also it's a list-post, shorter reads on large numbers of people, easy for scum to do and looks big. Most of the reads in the post are "easy reads" for scum to make, attacking people for playing in an anti-town fashion rather than for actually being scum and attacking other people for invented reasons. A lot of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

The rest of his posting shows much less effort put into analyzing the game. An example is how Clarity is still his preferred lynch target in his final posts before N1, despite a lot more information being put into the thread and a lot more public discussion among the principals of that situation. He hasn't made any real cases since his first post, and he hasn't actually followed up on his DI, xatalos, or grackaroni reads. From the clear and huge difference in effort between his first post and the rest of his filter, it's clear that his first post was very much constructed and careful, which imo is a scum thing to do; additionally, the fact that he was careful and put effort into just writing that post makes it even more suspect that his reads in it were so obviously bad in such a specifically scummy way.

So yeah, what I want to hear next is from people who've been in PMs with Risen, whether he's given more to them in terms of reads, cases, and indications that he's actually thinking carefully about the game than he has been in the thread.



First off, the first paragraph about risen getting lord is immediately wrong. during n2, Only rayn and risen were alive when they had to vote for lord, yet snb doesn't know this? He's mentioning 3 vote for one and one the other. He thought all 4 members of that house were alive? This indicates snb is clearly not paying attention to this game.

The first three paragraphs are all on his opening list post that EVERYONE AND THEIR MOTHER agreed was terrible. Why are you analyzing it snb? To make your case four times as big as it needed to be, perhaps? Big cases carry more weight, right?

Then there's the last bit:
Show nested quote +
The rest of his posting shows much less effort put into analyzing the game. An example is how Clarity is still his preferred lynch target in his final posts before N1, despite a lot more information being put into the thread and a lot more public discussion among the principals of that situation. He hasn't made any real cases since his first post, and he hasn't actually followed up on his DI, xatalos, or grackaroni reads. From the clear and huge difference in effort between his first post and the rest of his filter, it's clear that his first post was very much constructed and careful, which imo is a scum thing to do; additionally, the fact that he was careful and put effort into just writing that post makes it even more suspect that his reads in it were so obviously bad in such a specifically scummy way.


Notice how snb's case on risen is comprised entirely of Risen's day 1 and nothing else.

Yes, at the end of day 1 he still wanted to lynch me. But guess what? He eventually did change his mind on me and grack.
I doubt snb was even aware of it, but if he was then clearly he didn't care to mention it, because it would make his case less compelling.

AND

4) snb only shows up in thread when he's under pressure. When he's not under pressure he's nowhere to be found.

##Vote strongandbig


WHATS THIS, CLARITY IS VOTING FOR THE ONLY PERSON HE COULD CONSIDER TO BE THE TOWN ROLEBLOCKER? THIS IS NOT TOWNIE LOGIC, CLARITY IS SCUM
______________________________________________________________
That is what you sound like. And calling you a dork should not be insulting. It's like the mildest insult I could think of.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 10:44 GMT
#3797
On August 17 2013 19:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I am not accusing you of anything, i am trying to understand your thought process because i do not know your alignment.

I do not think there is a jailor because of Vivax flipping scum RB and Grackaroni being jailed on N3. So it's either town or mafia roleblocker. Town roleblocker makes sense if mafia roleblocked Sharrant on N2. Either way, no sane town roleblocker would block Sharrant, that makes Sharrant town. This means either scum roleblocked Onegu, or they withheld the roleblock to make him look more town (this also makes sense because he claimed blue on D2 - actually it makes sense in both Onegu = scum/town).

Did you think anyone else was suspicious of you at D1 end other than SnB?


I don't remember nor do I care to look back to see who was suspicious of me.
I'm glad you did an EBWOP to make sure I answered this important question.

I'm gonna take a break now.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 11:00 GMT
#3803
On August 17 2013 19:57 Dandel Ion wrote:
snb is scum because he didn't get modkilled for posting a wall of text during the night.

also the wall of text was terrible, but it's mainly the not-being-modkilled part.


discuss.


It was a pm meant for me, not alignment indicative. The only thing I suppose you can take from this is that snb and I are not both scum, or we send eachother fake scumhunt pms.
host wifom is the worst wifom.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 11:08 GMT
#3806
what did I not answer....
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 11:12 GMT
#3809
On August 17 2013 20:11 Dandel Ion wrote:
I'm inclined to lynch sharrant over mocsta atm.


Is it really that hard for you to not only post your conclusion, but also your thought process?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 11:17 GMT
#3815
On August 17 2013 20:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 20:09 Xatalos wrote:
On August 17 2013 20:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Xatalos yes he is. He stopped answering when there are no good answers for him any more.


I'm 99% sure Clarity is town. Maybe 80% sure that Onegu is town. It's also not a town mindset to bluehunt instead of scumhunt (like you seem to focus). If someone doesn't seem to be playing that townish, the first thought should be "scum", not "blue", unless you're scum of course. It's also completely stupid to assume that only people who pushed someone in the thread could have roleblocked someone. So I don't really see any value in your accusations.

Clarity is not even reading the thread as i have clearly pointed out.
Why do you think he is town? Also Onegu, why?


.............................................................................................

I've asked twice now what I haven't answered........

Like really, I don't see it. Tell me so I can answer, perhaps?
Holy fuck.

You did this whole "I advise you to read d3 now because I'm about to nail you as scum" and then your following post was "did you really not answer risen in pms? And why did you not vote vivax immediately when he claimed!!"

Like.... wtf are you doing rayn.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 11:19 GMT
#3817
On August 17 2013 20:15 Xatalos wrote:
By the way Clarity, considering that snb both 1) posted when he wasn't allowed to 2) presumably didn't vote at all, it doesn't make sense that he wouldn't be modkilled. DI has a slight point in that it's more likely for scum to avoid a modkill in this situation. Or let's put it this way:

1) posted against the rules and didn't vote -> no modkill - more likely scum than town based on how hosts usually act
or
2) intentionally voted for himself - more likely scum than town based on you pretty clearly being town and still denying your House a Lord intentionally

What do you think?


I think that I really don't like host wifom.

I dunno what happened with the vote yet, but I can easily see a scenario where snb got flustered because of fucking up and posting in thread and therefore didn't send his lord vote. I didn't remind him, either. Obviously that's not my job but normally I would have.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 11:25 GMT
#3822
On August 17 2013 20:22 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 20:17 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 20:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 20:09 Xatalos wrote:
On August 17 2013 20:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Xatalos yes he is. He stopped answering when there are no good answers for him any more.


I'm 99% sure Clarity is town. Maybe 80% sure that Onegu is town. It's also not a town mindset to bluehunt instead of scumhunt (like you seem to focus). If someone doesn't seem to be playing that townish, the first thought should be "scum", not "blue", unless you're scum of course. It's also completely stupid to assume that only people who pushed someone in the thread could have roleblocked someone. So I don't really see any value in your accusations.

Clarity is not even reading the thread as i have clearly pointed out.
Why do you think he is town? Also Onegu, why?


.............................................................................................

I've asked twice now what I haven't answered........

Like really, I don't see it. Tell me so I can answer, perhaps?
Holy fuck.

You did this whole "I advise you to read d3 now because I'm about to nail you as scum" and then your following post was "did you really not answer risen in pms? And why did you not vote vivax immediately when he claimed!!"

Like.... wtf are you doing rayn.

I don't need to make a case on you, it'll come on later. Now we are murdering Mocsta.

You stopped giving me answers when i talked about the town roleblovker stuff and who did you think were suspicious of you on D1. Well, you did "answer", but i do not believe you are telling the truth because i think you are mafia.


Ok so you think I'm scum because I stopped answering you
No wait, you think I'm scum because I DID answer you but you think I'm lying

No wait, it's not lying, it's that BECAUSE I'M SCUM you don't believe I'm telling the truth.

but i do not believe you are telling the truth because i think you are mafia.


rayn doesnt believe me BECAUSE he believes I'm scum

WHAT THE FUCK
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 11:27 GMT
#3823
It's not that he can point out anything as a lie, but I'm scum, so obviously I'm lying about something.

rayn is scum, I refuse to believe this is coming from a townie.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 11:44 GMT
#3832
Anyway here's what's happened.

Rayn as scum figured out something that SEEMS logical, and incriminates onegu.
I point out his logic makes no sense, he insists it does.

Him insisting makes him feel stuck, since if he just backs off he's afraid he'll be pegged as scum.
Then I explain how by his logic, I should be scum as well.

rayn feeling stuck on this one way street, takes the only path in front of him and says "yes, clarity is scum, he didn't answer my questions"
He repeats the fact that I haven't answered his questions a couple of times.
When I insist on him telling me what questions I haven't answered, rayn goes filterdiving and goes "crap, he did answer everything, what do I do?!?"
Then he backtracks and says "Well, you did "answer" my questions but I think it's not the truth, because you're scum"
Notice the lack of explanation, notice how general the accusation of lying is, no specific quote or logic.
Now I push back hard, say his logic makes no sense as town (because it doesn't) and rayn is forced to backtrack even more:
On August 17 2013 20:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Clarity scum don't have to lie. They don't have to say it in the first place. Why are you so angry when being accused? I wasn't even accusing you in the first place. I was trying to figure out your thought process. Then you started insulting me and my thought process and got angry.


He wasn't even accusing me in the first place it seems.
BUT WAIT
WHEN XATALOS ASKS HIM IF HE THINKS IM SCUM AS WELL AS ONEGU, HE ANSWERS YES
On August 17 2013 20:01 Xatalos wrote:
Back (as you can see from my Picard GIF, I was up a bit late last night...).

So we have another redcheck. There's a small chance (like less than 10%) that Mocsta was framed or something, but in all likeliness one of Sharrant or Mocsta is scum and must be lynched today. Mocsta should definitely be our lynch for today out of these two for a couple of reasons:
1) jrkirby's scummy play
2) Mocsta's nullish play
3) Sharrant's earlier redcheck success
4) I can also somewhat understand Sharrant's lacking playstyle if he is a permanent Cop (to avoid KP)
5) Mocsta's first reaction was "this is interesting" and give up, not to assume being framed or that Sharrant is scum - seriously...?

What went down in our House can basically be predicted from my last thread posts before deadline. I think I could have been able to convince Grackaroni to vote for me, but I still had some uncertainty about his alignment and wanted to see how he would use his status today (PMs + vote + KP etc.). I was also pretty certain I would die anyway (looks like I didn't) and I liked his thoughts during N3, leading me just to vote for him.

This crusade against Onegu by rayn is pretty pointless. Clarity had a good point when he said that by rayn's logic, Clarity is also scum. So rayn, is he? If not, why is Onegu scum? If you can't answer, are you just scum and flinging shit for no real reason?

On August 17 2013 20:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Xatalos yes he is. He stopped answering when there are no good answers for him any more.


I say fuck the mocsta or sharrant lynch, if sharrant is cop scum have to kill him because they have no roleblocker (unless scum has two, possible I guess). Let's just lynch rayn, definite scum.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 11:53 GMT
#3835
One way to interpret the post where he says "he didn't accuse me in the first place" is to say he didn't think I was scum until I got angry, so let's go through that scenario from rayns POV:

-I think clarity is town
-I think onegu is scum because of X
-Clarity disagrees with X and gave me a logical explanation of why
-When I insist on X being true, clarity got mad
-Clarity got mad at me not because he disagrees with me, but because he's scum
-because clarity is scum he lied to me at some point, so I'm going to say he's not saying the truth

This does not compute with me.
Rayn, if you have an alternate explanation now is the time to share it broski
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 11:57 GMT
#3837
On August 17 2013 20:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 20:50 Xatalos wrote:
On August 17 2013 20:44 Clarity_nl wrote:
Anyway here's what's happened.

Rayn as scum figured out something that SEEMS logical, and incriminates onegu.
I point out his logic makes no sense, he insists it does.

Him insisting makes him feel stuck, since if he just backs off he's afraid he'll be pegged as scum.
Then I explain how by his logic, I should be scum as well.

rayn feeling stuck on this one way street, takes the only path in front of him and says "yes, clarity is scum, he didn't answer my questions"
He repeats the fact that I haven't answered his questions a couple of times.
When I insist on him telling me what questions I haven't answered, rayn goes filterdiving and goes "crap, he did answer everything, what do I do?!?"
Then he backtracks and says "Well, you did "answer" my questions but I think it's not the truth, because you're scum"
Notice the lack of explanation, notice how general the accusation of lying is, no specific quote or logic.
Now I push back hard, say his logic makes no sense as town (because it doesn't) and rayn is forced to backtrack even more:
On August 17 2013 20:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Clarity scum don't have to lie. They don't have to say it in the first place. Why are you so angry when being accused? I wasn't even accusing you in the first place. I was trying to figure out your thought process. Then you started insulting me and my thought process and got angry.


He wasn't even accusing me in the first place it seems.
BUT WAIT
WHEN XATALOS ASKS HIM IF HE THINKS IM SCUM AS WELL AS ONEGU, HE ANSWERS YES
On August 17 2013 20:01 Xatalos wrote:
Back (as you can see from my Picard GIF, I was up a bit late last night...).

So we have another redcheck. There's a small chance (like less than 10%) that Mocsta was framed or something, but in all likeliness one of Sharrant or Mocsta is scum and must be lynched today. Mocsta should definitely be our lynch for today out of these two for a couple of reasons:
1) jrkirby's scummy play
2) Mocsta's nullish play
3) Sharrant's earlier redcheck success
4) I can also somewhat understand Sharrant's lacking playstyle if he is a permanent Cop (to avoid KP)
5) Mocsta's first reaction was "this is interesting" and give up, not to assume being framed or that Sharrant is scum - seriously...?

What went down in our House can basically be predicted from my last thread posts before deadline. I think I could have been able to convince Grackaroni to vote for me, but I still had some uncertainty about his alignment and wanted to see how he would use his status today (PMs + vote + KP etc.). I was also pretty certain I would die anyway (looks like I didn't) and I liked his thoughts during N3, leading me just to vote for him.

This crusade against Onegu by rayn is pretty pointless. Clarity had a good point when he said that by rayn's logic, Clarity is also scum. So rayn, is he? If not, why is Onegu scum? If you can't answer, are you just scum and flinging shit for no real reason?

On August 17 2013 20:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Xatalos yes he is. He stopped answering when there are no good answers for him any more.


I say fuck the mocsta or sharrant lynch, if sharrant is cop scum have to kill him because they have no roleblocker (unless scum has two, possible I guess). Let's just lynch rayn, definite scum.


LOL wtf Rayn? Your recent play really is full of contradictions. Can you explain your way out of this?

Clarity is misrepresenting me.
I did not accuse him before he got angry and answered with "i do not care to check and i do not remember".
After that you asked me if i think he is mafia and i said yes. Not before that.


You asked me who had a scumread on me d1. Why the fuck would I even bother figuring out that answer for you

If this is the question you referred to, then why did you first say I didn't answer it, and then said that I DID answer it but I'm not telling the truth (the truth is apparently NOT that I don't remember nor care to look)
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 12:00 GMT
#3840
On August 17 2013 20:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
ffs i was having an argument with Clarity, then he decided he wants to stop the argument when i am not done. With saying "i do not care and don't remember".

It's another thing if we are both town and just think differently, but if you think i am scum because i was trying to have an argument with someone and they start insulting me + fall back from the argument and because i think they are scum because of that you are being ridiculous-.


No rayn, you said you thought I was scum to xata. If you somehow did not think I was scum before I answered your dumb question with the truth that I didn't really care, then how do you come to the conclusion that both me and onegu are scum because of a dumb assertion you made BECAUSE I GOT MAD AT YOU.

Your thinking is full of holes. Scum making it up as they go along.
Hang him.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 12:06 GMT
#3844
This is dumb. I'm a townie. If I had posted a pm meant for snb in thread instead, I contact the hosts and go "fuck sorry should I edit it out?" hosts reply "yeah, and don't do it again" and I do.

Why is that different depending on alignment? Why is it less likely for scum to get modkilled? To me it makes sense for neither alignment to get modkilled.

Like, snb made the mistake and sent me a pm going "fuck", I told him "just edit it out and tell the hosts, I can vouch for the fact that it was a mistake pm and you're not being malicious", which I did tell the hosts, even though snb waited for hosts to tell him to edit it out.

Please comment on my rayn case DI.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 12:07 GMT
#3846
On August 17 2013 21:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 21:00 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 20:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
ffs i was having an argument with Clarity, then he decided he wants to stop the argument when i am not done. With saying "i do not care and don't remember".

It's another thing if we are both town and just think differently, but if you think i am scum because i was trying to have an argument with someone and they start insulting me + fall back from the argument and because i think they are scum because of that you are being ridiculous-.


No rayn, you said you thought I was scum to xata. If you somehow did not think I was scum before I answered your dumb question with the truth that I didn't really care, then how do you come to the conclusion that both me and onegu are scum because of a dumb assertion you made BECAUSE I GOT MAD AT YOU.

Your thinking is full of holes. Scum making it up as they go along.
Hang him.

Fuck you. You are straight out lying!


When you say someone is lying, it helps to point out what the lie is. This is the second time you've accused me of lying without doing the second part.

You have logic that makes onegu scum
I point out it makes me scum too
You say I'm scum for being angry at you
You did NOT say I am scum because your logic that makes onegu scum applies to me

Ergo, making it up on the spot.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 12:09 GMT
#3849
On August 17 2013 21:07 Dandel Ion wrote:
imo we should lynch snb and shoot mocsta just to be save about the red check.

moc is not full hp either, so he should be in lord kp range.


I know this is true... but how do you know this?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 12:12 GMT
#3851
On August 17 2013 21:09 Dandel Ion wrote:
because I've been told he's been shot at.

duh


I'd pursue this more if I was lord T.T

Assume you cannot lynch snb, who do you lynch?
Preferably rayn/mocsta/sharrant (in that order for me)
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 12:22 GMT
#3855
On August 17 2013 21:18 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 21:07 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:00 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 20:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
ffs i was having an argument with Clarity, then he decided he wants to stop the argument when i am not done. With saying "i do not care and don't remember".

It's another thing if we are both town and just think differently, but if you think i am scum because i was trying to have an argument with someone and they start insulting me + fall back from the argument and because i think they are scum because of that you are being ridiculous-.


No rayn, you said you thought I was scum to xata. If you somehow did not think I was scum before I answered your dumb question with the truth that I didn't really care, then how do you come to the conclusion that both me and onegu are scum because of a dumb assertion you made BECAUSE I GOT MAD AT YOU.

Your thinking is full of holes. Scum making it up as they go along.
Hang him.

Fuck you. You are straight out lying!


When you say someone is lying, it helps to point out what the lie is. This is the second time you've accused me of lying without doing the second part.

You have logic that makes onegu scum
I point out it makes me scum too
You say I'm scum for being angry at you
You did NOT say I am scum because your logic that makes onegu scum applies to me

Ergo, making it up on the spot.

The same logic only applies to you if you:
1) Tell me who you think were suspicious of you at D1 end
2) Are not bad and bluehunt
3) Have been pushing those people after that

What you said was:
- SnB was not even suspicious of you
- You "don't care to tell me who you thought was suspicious of you, and don't remember" (IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER IF THE PEOPLE WERE OR WERE NOT SUSPICIOUS OF YOU, IT MATTERS IF YYYYYYYOOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUU THINK SO OR NOT!"!"!"!!!"!!")
- You insult me.

To me that seems like you are avoiding the issue i have with you, you are not willing to explain to me your thought process, there is something (if you tell the truth) i find out where you have fucked up.

Those are the reasons i thought you were mafia for. And that was AFTER the Onegu argument and for DIFFERENT reasons.

If you are unable to see that i don't know what to say.


My thought process about what? What have I not explained my thought process about?
Is this another "you haven't answered my questions" ???

I'm sure at some point I said people other then snb and ft who are town could have roleblocked me, does that not answer your question?

Who the fuck gets so offended over someone calling them a dork?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 12:37 GMT
#3859
On August 17 2013 21:18 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Those are the reasons i thought you were mafia for. And that was AFTER the Onegu argument and for DIFFERENT reasons.

If you are unable to see that i don't know what to say.


Timestamps
On August 17 2013 18:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 18:36 Onegu wrote:
On August 17 2013 18:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 18:26 Onegu wrote:
On August 10 2013 13:50 FirmTofu wrote:
Town Clarity is someone who has a very confident Day 1. He pressures people, attacks with authority, and backs off only when he is confident that the player he is attacking is not scum. Clarity displayed NONE of that during day 1. Clarity played rather passive and although he was relatively active, his accusations were a lot less characteristic of his town play.



Well FT posted this right before his mislynch after his flip maybe people looked at that, SnB still had a scum read on him iirc. If you really want me to Ill look more but I dont think looking for town RB is something that needs to be done right now as again it isnt relevant.


On August 16 2013 00:40 Onegu wrote:
Guess since Im the person who first pushed for a SnB lynch with the lords I should vote him


##VOTE:StrongAndBig


Firmtofu is dead. SnB had a scumread on Clarity. You think there is a town roleblocker who blocked Clarity on N1, and you on N2.

Now, why did you vote for the guy who was most likely to be the town roleblocker in your mind on D3?

I know why. Because scum!



Wow are you serious? You asked me who had scum reads on clarity, I never once said I think one of those two are town RB, there is no reason for me to try to find town RB, I was just point out a few people had scum reads on clarity so it is likely others had a scum read on him also.


Can anyone see why this post makes zero sense?


This is where rayn thinks onegu is scum because of his logical fallacy

On August 17 2013 19:44 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 19:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I am not accusing you of anything, i am trying to understand your thought process because i do not know your alignment.

I do not think there is a jailor because of Vivax flipping scum RB and Grackaroni being jailed on N3. So it's either town or mafia roleblocker. Town roleblocker makes sense if mafia roleblocked Sharrant on N2. Either way, no sane town roleblocker would block Sharrant, that makes Sharrant town. This means either scum roleblocked Onegu, or they withheld the roleblock to make him look more town (this also makes sense because he claimed blue on D2 - actually it makes sense in both Onegu = scum/town).

Did you think anyone else was suspicious of you at D1 end other than SnB?


I don't remember nor do I care to look back to see who was suspicious of me.
I'm glad you did an EBWOP to make sure I answered this important question.

I'm gonna take a break now.


This is where rayn thinks I'm scum for being angry at him
On August 17 2013 19:28 Clarity_nl wrote:
I see no reason for me to get jailed n1 so I think I was roleblocked.

Here let me make a case on myself:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 05:57 Clarity_nl wrote:
Doesn't really matter. Highly unlikely town would roleblock you, so the roleblock came from scum or scum withheld a roleblock to give you town cred which you already had.

So you're town. Don't really care about the rest.
Stop measuring dicks please.


CLARITY CLEARLY THINKS THAT XATA WAS ROLEBLOCKED BY SCUM, THAT MEANS HE BELIEVES HE GOT ROLEBLOCKED BY TOWN

THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO EXPRESSED A SCUMREAD ON CLARITY AND WOULD THEREFORE ROLEBLOCK HIM AS TOWN ARE FT AND SNB

FT DIED SO CLARITY MUST ASSUME THAT SNB IS TOWN ROLEBLOCKER

Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 04:19 Clarity_nl wrote:
snb asked me in a pm why I think he's scum, and asked me to answer either in pm or thread, he doesn't seem happy with the "he's not doing anything" reason. So here it is, why snb is scum:

1) Low activity. It CAN be town, but it's more likely to be disinterested scum.
2) After being lord d1 snb suddenly does not want to be lord d2. He tells both me and oats the exact same phrase in pms "I want to run for lord n3 again, I want to re-earn my obv-towniness from n0"
3) Broken promises. This ties into point 2. He has not re-earned his "obv-towniness" at all. d2 he didn't do much, that's simply how it is. He had no presence in the thread at all, nor im pms.

How about d3 you ask? He's pushed risen real hard you say?
Let's look at his main post on risen shall we.
+ Show Spoiler +
On August 13 2013 01:45 strongandbig wrote:
So here's what I want to talk about - why has Risen been getting a pass today? I don't even care about him being lord. It sounds completely reasonable that he would be chosen since his house was worried Rayne would die (although it seems like a better plan would have been for three to vote Rayne and Risen to vote himself, that way if Ryan dies Risen would be the next lord automatically). Anyway, we should be pressuring Risen for what's in his filter.

(1) The big entry post - I talked some about this before, but it's total bullshit.
He attacked Oats, Yamato, and DI for playing anti-town, shitting up the thread, fighting over nothing, etc. The problem is, this is exactly what they do EVERY GAME. Oats argues over stupid things, Yamato is touchy as fuck, and DI is the most anti-town town player possible. They are the very definition of easy targets for scum to attack exactly like Risen did - but Risen should have known better than to call them scum and push for their lynch off of it.

(aside:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 03:27 Risen wrote:Oats is scum, Yamato is null The funny thing is that prior to looking into the filters I thought Yamato would come across as more scummy than Oats, and gave kush a pass while reading through because of that.
Connection theory! Reads like scum not wanting to either attack their buddy or directly defending them. Although Yamato is super touchy, it is more out of character for him to take a fight so far in the fucking-the-thread direction than it is for Oats to do so, and Risen doesn't actually give any reasons why he thinks Yamato is a better scum target than Oats, he just asserts that his filter looks better.)

In that post, he also calls Xatalos scum based on what boils down in part to a connection theory with his bullshit read on DI. Connection theories with unflipped (or un-scumclaimed) players? Okay, can be done by town, but shouldn't, another easy way for scum to generate reads.

Another thing - just look at that post in general. It's huge, so he must be town right? (just ask austinmcc!) Nope, wrong! A large part of the post is stream-of-consciousness, much easier to write than an actual structured case. Also it's a list-post, shorter reads on large numbers of people, easy for scum to do and looks big. Most of the reads in the post are "easy reads" for scum to make, attacking people for playing in an anti-town fashion rather than for actually being scum and attacking other people for invented reasons. A lot of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

The rest of his posting shows much less effort put into analyzing the game. An example is how Clarity is still his preferred lynch target in his final posts before N1, despite a lot more information being put into the thread and a lot more public discussion among the principals of that situation. He hasn't made any real cases since his first post, and he hasn't actually followed up on his DI, xatalos, or grackaroni reads. From the clear and huge difference in effort between his first post and the rest of his filter, it's clear that his first post was very much constructed and careful, which imo is a scum thing to do; additionally, the fact that he was careful and put effort into just writing that post makes it even more suspect that his reads in it were so obviously bad in such a specifically scummy way.

So yeah, what I want to hear next is from people who've been in PMs with Risen, whether he's given more to them in terms of reads, cases, and indications that he's actually thinking carefully about the game than he has been in the thread.



First off, the first paragraph about risen getting lord is immediately wrong. during n2, Only rayn and risen were alive when they had to vote for lord, yet snb doesn't know this? He's mentioning 3 vote for one and one the other. He thought all 4 members of that house were alive? This indicates snb is clearly not paying attention to this game.

The first three paragraphs are all on his opening list post that EVERYONE AND THEIR MOTHER agreed was terrible. Why are you analyzing it snb? To make your case four times as big as it needed to be, perhaps? Big cases carry more weight, right?

Then there's the last bit:
The rest of his posting shows much less effort put into analyzing the game. An example is how Clarity is still his preferred lynch target in his final posts before N1, despite a lot more information being put into the thread and a lot more public discussion among the principals of that situation. He hasn't made any real cases since his first post, and he hasn't actually followed up on his DI, xatalos, or grackaroni reads. From the clear and huge difference in effort between his first post and the rest of his filter, it's clear that his first post was very much constructed and careful, which imo is a scum thing to do; additionally, the fact that he was careful and put effort into just writing that post makes it even more suspect that his reads in it were so obviously bad in such a specifically scummy way.


Notice how snb's case on risen is comprised entirely of Risen's day 1 and nothing else.

Yes, at the end of day 1 he still wanted to lynch me. But guess what? He eventually did change his mind on me and grack.
I doubt snb was even aware of it, but if he was then clearly he didn't care to mention it, because it would make his case less compelling.

AND

4) snb only shows up in thread when he's under pressure. When he's not under pressure he's nowhere to be found.

##Vote strongandbig


WHATS THIS, CLARITY IS VOTING FOR THE ONLY PERSON HE COULD CONSIDER TO BE THE TOWN ROLEBLOCKER? THIS IS NOT TOWNIE LOGIC, CLARITY IS SCUM
______________________________________________________________
That is what you sound like. And calling you a dork should not be insulting. It's like the mildest insult I could think of.


THIS IS THE POST WHERE I SAY IF HE THINKS ONEGU IS SCUM HE MUST THINK I AM SCUM, NOTICE HOW THEY ARE INBETWEEN THE TWO POSTS

This means the chronological order is:

18:37 rayn calls onegu scum for dumb reasons
Clarity explains why they are dumb reasons
rayn explains his reasons arent dumb
19:28 Clarity explains that with his reasoning he should consider Clarity scum
This is where rayn should have a scumread on me
19:44 rayn thinks clarity is scum now because he got angry at him (he confirms this with his xata interaction)

Let's look at the first post I quoted again

On August 17 2013 21:18 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Those are the reasons i thought you were mafia for. And that was AFTER the Onegu argument and for DIFFERENT reasons.

If you are unable to see that i don't know what to say.


Rayn says that he got a scumread on me after the onegu argument, but the onegu argument was before I got angry at him.

Get dunked.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 12:40 GMT
#3862
That last line is phrased poorly but you get the idea. No logical sense from rayn.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 12:43 GMT
#3864
On August 17 2013 21:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 21:40 Clarity_nl wrote:
That last line is phrased poorly but you get the idea. No logical sense from rayn.

No, read my posts again. You are totally wrong in what you are saying.


Again, you called me a liar twice and now wrong. Yet again, no explanation where I was lying and what is wrong.

Xata asked you: "if you think onegu is scum that must mean you think clarity is scum, is he?"
You answered: "yes, he is"

Problem is then you made up weird reasons
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 12:46 GMT
#3865
On August 17 2013 21:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 21:22 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:18 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:07 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:00 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 20:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
ffs i was having an argument with Clarity, then he decided he wants to stop the argument when i am not done. With saying "i do not care and don't remember".

It's another thing if we are both town and just think differently, but if you think i am scum because i was trying to have an argument with someone and they start insulting me + fall back from the argument and because i think they are scum because of that you are being ridiculous-.


No rayn, you said you thought I was scum to xata. If you somehow did not think I was scum before I answered your dumb question with the truth that I didn't really care, then how do you come to the conclusion that both me and onegu are scum because of a dumb assertion you made BECAUSE I GOT MAD AT YOU.

Your thinking is full of holes. Scum making it up as they go along.
Hang him.

Fuck you. You are straight out lying!


When you say someone is lying, it helps to point out what the lie is. This is the second time you've accused me of lying without doing the second part.

You have logic that makes onegu scum
I point out it makes me scum too
You say I'm scum for being angry at you
You did NOT say I am scum because your logic that makes onegu scum applies to me

Ergo, making it up on the spot.

The same logic only applies to you if you:
1) Tell me who you think were suspicious of you at D1 end
2) Are not bad and bluehunt
3) Have been pushing those people after that

What you said was:
- SnB was not even suspicious of you
- You "don't care to tell me who you thought was suspicious of you, and don't remember" (IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER IF THE PEOPLE WERE OR WERE NOT SUSPICIOUS OF YOU, IT MATTERS IF YYYYYYYOOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUU THINK SO OR NOT!"!"!"!!!"!!")
- You insult me.

To me that seems like you are avoiding the issue i have with you, you are not willing to explain to me your thought process, there is something (if you tell the truth) i find out where you have fucked up.

Those are the reasons i thought you were mafia for. And that was AFTER the Onegu argument and for DIFFERENT reasons.

If you are unable to see that i don't know what to say.


My thought process about what? What have I not explained my thought process about?
Is this another "you haven't answered my questions" ???

I'm sure at some point I said people other then snb and ft who are town could have roleblocked me, does that not answer your question?

Who the fuck gets so offended over someone calling them a dork?

This is the last time i am trying to explain this.
When i asked you "who do you think were suspicious of you on D1 end" you answered "i don't remember and i do not care to check". If you do not answer me in that question, i can't follow your thought process (where i apply my logic of people actually thinking about this game - figuring out who does what and why) about who do you think who could have roleblocked you in your mind. Then i am unable to use my logic on if you are scum or not based on if you have pushed those people's lynch after that.

Like here is what i would think if i was roleblocked and assumed a roleblocker blocked me:
1) Are they a jailor or a roleblocker (do they have a town/scum read on me)?
2) In case of no jailor (as it seems likely now), is it town or mafia roleblocker?
3) In case i come to conclusion (as you have come?) town roleblocker;
4) Who had a scumread on me? (let's apply the logic i used on Onegu here and say SnB is the only one)
5) SnB
6) Conclusion; SnB is likely a town roleblocker.
...
7) Now, as i have a reason to assume SnB is a town roleblocker, i have something to work with. I need to find more about him to confirm him in a way or another in case (1) he really is the town rb'r, so i can defend him for not being possibly mislynched, or (2) i am wrong in something, who else fit's in the profile so i can go back to 1 with them.

Do you understand my logic?


And here you apply the logic again that I said would make me scum too.
Yet you called me scum for getting angry at you, not for the exact same reasons. YOU SAID TO XATA I AM SCUM FOR THOSE REASONS and then YOU SAID I'M SCUM BECAUSE I GOT MAD

You cannot keep your story straight because you're not thinking about the game in a way that implies a townie mindset.
You're just trying to look like you're thinking about the game.

Get tunneled son
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 12:50 GMT
#3870
On August 17 2013 21:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 21:43 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:40 Clarity_nl wrote:
That last line is phrased poorly but you get the idea. No logical sense from rayn.

No, read my posts again. You are totally wrong in what you are saying.


Again, you called me a liar twice and now wrong. Yet again, no explanation where I was lying and what is wrong.

Xata asked you: "if you think onegu is scum that must mean you think clarity is scum, is he?"
You answered: "yes, he is"

Problem is then you made up weird reasons

Yes i thought you were scum at that time. Not for same reasons than Onegu.


This simply cannot be, because I proved that if you think onegu is scum for that you must think I am scum for that too.
You confirmed that this is what you thought to xata when he asked if I'm scum too because of the reason onegu is scum.
Then you ignore all of that and call me scum for completely different reasons.

Anyway I got my point across by now, I'll be back later.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 12:54 GMT
#3876
Alright let me address that then since you seem to be clinging to it for dear life:

The same logic only applies to you if you:
1) Tell me who you think were suspicious of you at D1 end
2) Are not bad and bluehunt
3) Have been pushing those people after that


1) Why does this matter? clearly the thread shows only ft and snb were suspicious of me, and by your logic that means only those two can be town roleblocker in my eyes.
2) same goes for onegu but you didn't mention that
3) I HAVE, I PUSHED SNB MOST OF d3
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 12:56 GMT
#3878
Unless you can explain how onegu can be scum and I can be town according to your logic, I'm going with you're scum who couldn't keep his story straight.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 12:57 GMT
#3880
On August 17 2013 21:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Because mafia is more careful about posting in thread under silent nights, and i think SnB would have not done that if he was mafia.


What the fuck is this logic. You don't think both alignments would be careful not to post during a silent night?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 13:03 GMT
#3886
On August 17 2013 21:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 21:54 Clarity_nl wrote:
Alright let me address that then since you seem to be clinging to it for dear life:

The same logic only applies to you if you:
1) Tell me who you think were suspicious of you at D1 end
2) Are not bad and bluehunt
3) Have been pushing those people after that


1) Why does this matter? clearly the thread shows only ft and snb were suspicious of me, and by your logic that means only those two can be town roleblocker in my eyes.
2) same goes for onegu but you didn't mention that
3) I HAVE, I PUSHED SNB MOST OF d3

1) Because not all the people do not read the thread in the same way. If that was the case we would have only same opinions about everything. I can't possibly know who you think is suspicious of you because you read posts differently (at least those that address you) than i do. It's not always so black & white. The difference with you and Onegu is that he told me he thought FT and SnB were suspicious of him (in his opinion) and didn't remember anyone else.
2) I did mention that. That was the whole foundation of my case today on him, lol
3) Yes you have, the difference is in (1). You did not tell me if you thought SnB was suspicious of you or not. If you thought SnB was not suspicious of you at the end of D1, you pushing him means shit and is not alignment indicative in this case.


that's because you specifically asked onegu who was suspicious of me d1, what is he supposed to answer other than the two people that showed it in thread? Is he supposed to guess?!? He even later said that other townies could easily have a scumread on me during n1 but didn't mention it. But you just glanced over that post didn't you?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 13:05 GMT
#3888
Mistakes happen, it didn't harm anything. People who are host wifoming that scum is less likely to get modkilled for it are dumb.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 13:16 GMT
#3900
On August 17 2013 22:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 22:05 Clarity_nl wrote:
Mistakes happen, it didn't harm anything. People who are host wifoming that scum is less likely to get modkilled for it are dumb.

Yes i understand SnB and Ace made a mistake, it's pretty clear whatever SnB's alignment is.
I was referring to other ~5 people who clearly did not make a mistake.


it's not clear what his alignment is at all what the fuck.

I'm actually gonna step away from the game for a bit.

logical fallacies happen on both alignments, my issue with rayn is that he answered xata's question with a simply "yes, he's scum" and then later he explains it's because I got angry and refused to show my train of thought, as if I haven't done that all game or something.

Calling me scum for something as dumb as me not answering who I think the people are that I thought had a scumread on me is stupid beyond belief, it seems like scum taking an opportunity to first annoy and then blame the townie for getting annoyed.

I cannot follow rayn's train of thought from a town perspective, I can follow it from a scum perspective.

On August 17 2013 22:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Xatalos, Why do you want to get the possible cop killed?


God you're useless. This is like when you yelled at xata and me for discussing oberyn's watcher claim.
I even mentioned that I'd rather lynch you instead of sharrant/mocsta since sharrant should die anyway if he's town before xata did.

Like, it's like you read a post and your first thought is "what question can I ask him?" and then your thought process ends and you post a question.

BRB
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 13:18 GMT
#3901
On August 17 2013 22:16 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 22:10 Xatalos wrote:
On August 17 2013 22:07 Dandel Ion wrote:
I rescind any and all town feelings on mocsta.
lynch or shoot, whatever, idc.


What do you think of my earlier reasoning:

Actually, the more I think about it...... I might not want to lynch into Sharrant/Mocsta today.
1) Scum can't roleblock anymore (extremely likely) so scum WILL kill Sharrant before long if he's town (since he apparently has unlimited checks)
2) If Sharrant flips town, then Mocsta is most likely scum
3) If Sharrant never dies, then Mocsta is most likely town and Sharrant scum


So what happens if Sharrant lives past the night and claims roleblocked?
What happens if Sharrant and someone else claims roleblocked?
What happens if Sharrant lives and gives another red check?
What happens if Sharrant lives and gives a green check?


If sharrant claims roleblock then a townie can counterclaim if sharrant is lying.
If sharrant gives another redcheck we can lynch sharrant and if he flips cop we have two nearly confirmed reds.
If sharrant lives and gives a green check that's fine. More information, we'll learn if it's true or wifom at some point.

Think for yourself.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 13:45 GMT
#3915
On August 17 2013 22:41 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 22:34 Dandel Ion wrote:
the order should be snb -> shoot mocsta

Let me think on this. Why is Rayn not in your list?

Also, how is Mocsta below full HP? I don't know of any lords shooting him?

N1, all lords allegedly shot gumshoe. If someone didn't, they didn't claim.
N2, no shots went to Mocsta insofar as I know.
N3, only Sharrant claimed to shoot someone other than Kush/jwup and he shot Koshi.

So who shot jrkirby/Mocsta?


Need to know information, but both me and xata know.
It wasn't really rayn shitting up the thread as much as it was me.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 13:54 GMT
#3920
Gonna be a hypocrit, once.
[image loading]
Xata + Clarity cute seals.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 13:57 GMT
#3922
On August 17 2013 22:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Why would mafia sacrifice roleblocker over like... any role?
Why not let SnB get lynched and lynch Vivax instead?


This is a good point and I've considered this.
The problem is vivax wasn't bussed, he was pushed by town, harder than I wanted to lynch snb.
Vivax as scum roleblock going "NO LYNCH SNB INSTEAD" and snb flipping red would not mean vivax wasn't gonna get lynched.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 14:02 GMT
#3929
On August 17 2013 22:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Do you genuinely think we had 2 scum wagons yesterday and nobody tried to push a townie lynch?


Hmm. Well, some people tried pushing sharrant, some people tried pushing mocsta. But town's been rolling pretty good, I don't think scum has much of a voice in this game.

Like, xata kinda said in thread what I said about him to solstice. "I get to the point where I'm so confident that someone is town that I start second guessing myself, at that point I just say "well fuck it, if he's scum he deserves to win" and I've never had someone that I've said that about flip scum.

Anyway I agree we shouldn't lynch snb today.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 14:08 GMT
#3940
On August 17 2013 23:06 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 23:02 Dandel Ion wrote:
On August 17 2013 22:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:
There seems to be a big amount of information Clarity and Xatalos know that others don't..

i have it lel

kool kids klub
no unkool kids welcome


You know about you know what too...?


He said earlier he knows mocsta is damaged. Already questioned him in thread but can't anymore cause IM NOT LORD FUUUUUU
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 14:26 GMT
#3958
On August 17 2013 23:23 Acrofales wrote:
Okay. DI is being a dick. He is claiming he knows someone shot Mocsta, but isn't saying whether he knows because he used the HP check, or because someone claimed vigi. I did the math on the Lord KP and there is only 1 possible shot on Mocsta: from Oats on N2. The only other potential KP that is missing is that Sharrant lied, or Risen lied. Neither seems likely at all to me.

I don't care who shot him. I care that it WASN'T scum. Can anybody guarantee that?


That depends. Do you believe xata, myself and DI to all be scum?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 14:30 GMT
#3960
Yeah unless he somehow got healed. Sucks that we have 1 less kp tonight but mocsta can die tonight.
This is your cue btw mocsta, even if you think you can't avoid getting killed by town, time to contribute with all your thoughts nicely condensed and useful etc etc
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 14:53 GMT
#3970
So we're not lynching johnny and mocsta because we're shooting them in the face.
We're not lynching snb because reasons, I guess.

Koshi took 1 kp by sharrant, but the thing is there's only so many nights of lord kp we have left, so maybe koshi is a good consideration for a lynch?

I still wanna lynch rayn. Notice how now that I've stopped tunneling him he has withdrawn both me and onegu from his scumlist despite claiming earlier he had scumreads on us for different reasons.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 15:01 GMT
#3976
On August 17 2013 23:56 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 23:53 Clarity_nl wrote:
So we're not lynching johnny and mocsta because we're shooting them in the face.
We're not lynching snb because reasons, I guess.

Koshi took 1 kp by sharrant, but the thing is there's only so many nights of lord kp we have left, so maybe koshi is a good consideration for a lynch?

I still wanna lynch rayn. Notice how now that I've stopped tunneling him he has withdrawn both me and onegu from his scumlist despite claiming earlier he had scumreads on us for different reasons.


Is there some reason other than speculation for why snb is town? rayn could be okay though. It's just that he's active and will ultimately dig his own grave if he keeps up (unlike snb).


No.. not really. Been flip flopping on snb all game.
I'll have to go back to pms and see if I can find something that makes it more or less likely that vivax/snb are both scum at some point.

I felt a little better about snb last night but then he didnt vote for me.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 15:02 GMT
#3978
On August 18 2013 00:02 Dandel Ion wrote:
clarity you claimed rb today right?


Nope
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 15:06 GMT
#3984
On August 18 2013 00:04 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 23:30 Clarity_nl wrote:
Yeah unless he somehow got healed. Sucks that we have 1 less kp tonight but mocsta can die tonight.
This is your cue btw mocsta, even if you think you can't avoid getting killed by town, time to contribute with all your thoughts nicely condensed and useful etc etc

Go fuck yourself


You don't wanna contribute?

Like, I'm not set on your lynch/shot yet... or I guess I wasn't...
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 15:07 GMT
#3986
On August 18 2013 00:06 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +

From: Dandel Ion [ 7123 posts | Profile | Buddy | Report ]
Subject: Re: hello
Date: 8/17/13 21:29
can you give me the hp numbers plz?

i wanted to check my house anyways, twice. before and after a night.
if you gimme i can just use our check now and it'd save me sick amounts of time.

Original Message From Mocsta:
We used it last cycle to check your house.

What hp am I on. Btw?

Do we know who checked me?
I'm pretty proud to be shot as a late replacement.

Show nested quote +

I can get modkilled now.

U guys are a bunch of real dumb fucks.


What the fuck is this ragequite for no reason. zzzzzz
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 15:09 GMT
#3991
On August 18 2013 00:07 Dandel Ion wrote:
the pm's are real btw

100% copy-pasted


Alright well mocsta claimed town and is gonna get modkilled, that's great.
Fucking hell.

I don't even understand why.....
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 15:11 GMT
#3994
Going forward with mocsta being confirmed town, does that make sharrant scum?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 15:14 GMT
#3999
On August 18 2013 00:13 Xatalos wrote:
This might have actually been the most pro-town action for him I guess? Saving us some KP and a lynch.


Yeah but before you're pro-town you gotta be pro-game. This is dumb.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 15:18 GMT
#4001
Man, aside from my mini blowup on rayn I was enjoying this game.
Like, I didn't even mind ace being a dumbass as much.

But this just sucked my spirits.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 15:36 GMT
#4009
On August 18 2013 00:22 s0Lstice wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 18 2013 00:19 Sharrant wrote:
On August 18 2013 00:16 s0Lstice wrote:
well this is very interesting..

i have a strong urge to kill sharrant


Do tell.

And I'm saying it again, I'm pretty sure Johnny is town.


outside of your checks there is nothing to go on from you really aside from general PM niceties. you've been floating on all this town cred and doing nothing with it.


And you know, his supposed red check is soon to modconfirmed something, and I'll bet my left arm dollar it's town.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 15:38 GMT
#4011
All stags do is kill direwolves and themselves along with it SYMBOLISM
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 15:41 GMT
#4014
On August 18 2013 00:41 Onegu wrote:
Im guessing he flips miller


That would be hilarious.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 15:42 GMT
#4016
do non self-aware millers flip as non self-aware millers or as vt?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 15:47 GMT
#4019
Well done s0lstice. Whatever is in his post now, you get the credit.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 16:04 GMT
#4026
On August 18 2013 01:00 strongandbig wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 18 2013 00:13 Xatalos wrote:
This might have actually been the most pro-town action for him I guess? Saving us some KP and a lynch.

Strategic self-modkill is right up there with ubsanctuoned editing of posts on the "cheating" list.


That's what I said. Only clevererer
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 16:07 GMT
#4031
But I didn't wanna lynch him, I wanted to shoot him.
rayn had a good argument for not shooting him though, and lynching him instead, but now we never get that discussion

What I'm trying to say is fuck you mocsta.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 16:12 GMT
#4035
On August 18 2013 01:10 Chromatically wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 18 2013 01:02 s0Lstice wrote:
On August 18 2013 00:50 Chromatically wrote:
Lynch Risen today? In addition to everything I said yesterday, there's the Vivax association. Risen calls Vivax a scumread in PMs, but doesn't have coherent reasons for it (scum don't want to read their scumbuddies). And, he never pushes Vivax in thread and only consolidates onto the vote when the lynch is clear.


As far as Sharrant goes, what do you think about this?

So your idea is that Sharrant, before bussing his scumbuddy yamato, FAKECLAIMED cop to Acro to ask for his opinion? And he was just going to hope that Acro suggested yamato, so that way he could LIE and say he was checking kush, before actually bussing yamato???

I think this is highly unlikely if Sharrant is scum. It's a dumb move for town, but I can't see scum doing this with a town Acro. Maybe it's a big play where they're both scum, but that's just unnecessary. I also don't see why scum would invent the "HP check even days".

I agree that it's unlikely that Mocsta was framed, but I think it's less likely that Sharrant is faking all of this.

Obviously irrelevant if he flips miller.


Yes, I agree that it would be pretty outrageous from a scum Sharrant and town Acro point of view. I don't think it would be that crazy if they were both scum. Scum do what they think will make them win. Anyway, I don't really love pre-flip connections.

The bolded isn't entirely true. Risen voted and said the lynch was Vivax right around when I did, and I was at the very beginning of the wagon. He didn't push it all that hard, but to say he consolidated when it was clear isn't entirely right.

I'm not a fan of preflip connections either, but this isn't one. I don't see a reason for Sharrant to do this as scum either way, It's possible, but there's just no benefit.

That's true, I was going from memory on "lynch in the clear". The main point is that he had a large scumread on Vivax ("#1"), but he never pushed it in-thread, even when he was on the lynch. He voted SnB and Sharrant before actually voting Vivax.


Just like vivax had no reason to claim survivor jailkeeper.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 16:15 GMT
#4037
Anyone wanna go play some pool instead of play mafia or something? Drinks are on me
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 16:32 GMT
#4045
He pmed me earlier too, was really tempting to respond, oh well.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 16:56 GMT
#4058
On August 18 2013 01:53 s0Lstice wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 18 2013 01:43 Chromatically wrote:
On August 18 2013 01:20 s0Lstice wrote:
On August 18 2013 01:10 Chromatically wrote:
On August 18 2013 01:02 s0Lstice wrote:
On August 18 2013 00:50 Chromatically wrote:
Lynch Risen today? In addition to everything I said yesterday, there's the Vivax association. Risen calls Vivax a scumread in PMs, but doesn't have coherent reasons for it (scum don't want to read their scumbuddies). And, he never pushes Vivax in thread and only consolidates onto the vote when the lynch is clear.


As far as Sharrant goes, what do you think about this?

So your idea is that Sharrant, before bussing his scumbuddy yamato, FAKECLAIMED cop to Acro to ask for his opinion? And he was just going to hope that Acro suggested yamato, so that way he could LIE and say he was checking kush, before actually bussing yamato???

I think this is highly unlikely if Sharrant is scum. It's a dumb move for town, but I can't see scum doing this with a town Acro. Maybe it's a big play where they're both scum, but that's just unnecessary. I also don't see why scum would invent the "HP check even days".

I agree that it's unlikely that Mocsta was framed, but I think it's less likely that Sharrant is faking all of this.

Obviously irrelevant if he flips miller.


Yes, I agree that it would be pretty outrageous from a scum Sharrant and town Acro point of view. I don't think it would be that crazy if they were both scum. Scum do what they think will make them win. Anyway, I don't really love pre-flip connections.

The bolded isn't entirely true. Risen voted and said the lynch was Vivax right around when I did, and I was at the very beginning of the wagon. He didn't push it all that hard, but to say he consolidated when it was clear isn't entirely right.

I'm not a fan of preflip connections either, but this isn't one. I don't see a reason for Sharrant to do this as scum either way, It's possible, but there's just no benefit.

That's true, I was going from memory on "lynch in the clear". The main point is that he had a large scumread on Vivax ("#1"), but he never pushed it in-thread, even when he was on the lynch. He voted SnB and Sharrant before actually voting Vivax.


Hmm. I do agree that it isn't the likely scenario on Sharrant. I would really feel a lot better though if I had any sort of notion that he cared about the game outside of his checks.

On Risen, I think he was super unsure. It's just like the s&b discussion earlier. His vote and his interests are all over the place, and he will be pushing multiple things in a short period of time. Really difficult to say as we would typically that this guy is scum for not pushing his #1 scum read, because what does #1 scum read really mean for Risen if it lasts all of 5 minutes?



If we really assume that Risen changes his reads every 5 minutes, then it'll be impossible to tell if he's scum. Any time he has a read contradiction, someone can say "he does that as town too". It just invalidates all his reads. Scum Risen could literally say any read he wanted to for no reason and he would get away with it.

He had a unreasoned scumread on Vivax that he never pushed. That is a clear association that doesn't make sense from a town perspective. Add to that everything else he's done that doesn't make sense from anyone thinking about the game.

On August 18 2013 01:30 s0Lstice wrote:
what is he saying?

also...Chrom have you thought some more about the Risen v Xatalos stuff I was telling you about earlier?

I did, and I don't think it's alignment indicative.

I can't see the PMs in question, so I don't know exactly what made you think that Risen forgot about the Vivax lynch, but I think it could very easily be Risen just assuming that Vivax was done for, instead of actually forgetting.

He just really wants to push Xat, so he sends out the PMs, assuming that everyone would understand he was talking about tomorrow (given that Vivax is already dead). And then he sends out the second round just to make sure everyone knew.


yup pretty much. he's really hard to read because of how erratic he is.

So to make this public knowledge, Risen PMed me after Vivax made his claim thing saying he wanted to lynch Xatalos. This is shortly after posting in the thread something along the lines of Xatalos=bad. He then immediately sent a PM after saying 'oh oops nevermind we gotta lynch Vivax today.' Scum Risen knows Vivax is on his team, and hence would be pretty concerned with what side of this issue he ends up on. Why would he rock the boat like this as scum and muddy the waters after already being on the correct side of the Vivax wagon? How does this action improve his situation? It's crazy as town too, but the flakiness and carelessness of the action makes the town side a lot more likely.


That's pretty wifom. He could not have checked his qt, vivax could not have discussed the claim in his qt etc.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 17:00 GMT
#4060
I dunno, vivax pushed yamato and he turned out to be scum. Did he push anyone else this game?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 17:02 GMT
#4063
It's plurality voting for lynches, majority for lord election
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 17:13 GMT
#4073
because gumshoe woulda been a weird target to check for scum.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 17:34 GMT
#4077
I dunno how bussing a scum teammate for town cred and then faking a redcheck would be considered "award winning scumplay"

Acro is seriously overthinking this.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 17:35 GMT
#4078
stark still has its hp check although obviousy can't use it today, and I expect to die along with my sealbuddy tomorrow.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 17:38 GMT
#4081
[image loading]
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 17:38 GMT
#4082
Does that look like a townie to you?

Btw dandel calling someone a lurker, and he's not even wrong, lol
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 17:49 GMT
#4087
Unless scum are doing big play sunday because in that case, regardless of snb being scum or not, they won't kill me.
I don't care that much right now though, just want mocsta to die.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 17:52 GMT
#4089
AFTER the mocsta flip, if he flips town and not miller, I'm okay with hp checking sharrant (since it hits johnny too)
If sharrant has taken damage (let's just assume he has 7 hp) then he's town. If he hasn't we probably need to lynch him.
Same for johnny although scum wouldn't shoot him I don't think.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 18:18 GMT
#4110
I assume sharrant has taken some form of damage and acro is 7 hp?
Don't think that confirms him as scum, scum could have easily split their kp on sharrant xata and me, and they'll kill us 3 tonight.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 18:33 GMT
#4125
On August 18 2013 03:24 Acrofales wrote:
Clarity took damage.

##vote Strongandbig


Ofcourse I did. Why does that make snb scum?
Basically, 6 hourses, scum need 4 votes to have a majority.
If snb is scum he can just vote himself and then they need 3/5 votes, so killing me does not fit into the "grand plan" that you were talking about.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 18:46 GMT
#4133
Yeah you're right they only need 3/6, my mistake.
Still I think people are jumping to conclusions a bit too fast.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 19:24 GMT
#4143
Ugh, my head hurts. What just happened.

sharrant got hit last night
I got hit last night

I wish I had my hp check.

I don't believe acro being full hp makes him scum on its own.
I definitely believe sharrant being low makes him town.
I don't believe me being low hp makes snb scum

On August 18 2013 03:33 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 18 2013 03:31 Dandel Ion wrote:
On August 18 2013 03:27 Acrofales wrote:
@Dandel Ion: riddle me this. Why would I, as scum, come up with a plan that confirms Sharrant as town, when everybody was getting ready to lynch him?

why, for towncred obviously

Because I need more of that, when I am about the least likely person in the game to get lynched.

This is simply incorrect.

Keeping it simple... The most likely targets last night were sharrant xata and myself. Odds are the three of us are damaged and will die tonight.

Scum is somewhere in this list:
johnny
grack
chrom
snb
acro/onegu
...koshi I guess?

I'd lynch/kp top to bottom right now if I could.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 19:26 GMT
#4144
I also don't believe that DI is lying about his check, I believe the possibility of acro lying is there. He could be scum, knowing that they've shot me and just checked someone else for scum's use.
For now though, I'm just gonna stick with my reads rather than just throw everything out because of a couple of hp checks.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 21:01 GMT
#4180
On August 18 2013 05:44 johnnywup wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 18 2013 05:38 Xatalos wrote:
On August 18 2013 05:26 johnnywup wrote:
How did gumshoe and kush force town to shoot them? Is that what you're going to say about me after I flip?

And good, I want rayn dead.


What's your reasoning for rayn being scum?

never said i thought he was scum i said i wanted him dead. he's been an asshole to me and others and is disrupting town. at this point i don't care what he flips -.-



Lol.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 21:02 GMT
#4183
regardless of johnny's or rayn's alignment, johnny you have been pretty much useless, at least rayn makes himself readable (kinda)

What have you done johnny? I don't recall a single thing.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 21:03 GMT
#4186
On August 18 2013 06:01 Risen wrote:
I couldn't be a useful Lord this cycle and had to choose whether I should have no Lord or rayn Lord. Rayn Lord with a shot seemed a good compromise


Risen I hate you.

Like, this game... wtf happened man.

I give up for today.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 17 2013 21:30 GMT
#4193
On August 18 2013 06:01 Risen wrote:
I couldn't be a useful Lord this cycle and had to choose whether I should have no Lord or rayn Lord. Rayn Lord with a shot seemed a good compromise


Just came back to say this is the dumbest thing I've ever fucking heard.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 07:59 GMT
#4204
On August 18 2013 10:58 Risen wrote:
So Sharrant appears scummy and is relatively useless (in a what has this person contributed kind of way, not insulting), but gets a red check and since that guys posting is scummy we lynch him. Sharrant is still scummy but gives us another red check on someone who has somewhere around zero percent chance of being framed. That person flips green prior to our lynch today and we're not lynching him because an increasingly useless (not insulting, just mean to say DI was good according to the thread and has dropped off) DI says they used house check....

What has DI done to instill such trust? Has anyone looked at what potentially happens when a town mocsta gets lynched? Who's left alive in that house? A lone Onegu.

Regardless, you guys sit on that. Just went into johnny's filter trying to find house member list and found...


If town shot sharrant they should claim it. If they don't, and sharrant flips green, DI is confirmed scum. Scum don't shoot themselves.

It's kind of like we lynched mocsta and we flipped green and then we lynched sharrant, except for the fact that sharrant is apparently town. So yes, mocsta modkilling himself like a tool is beneficial for us and that makes me sad.

Everyone is aware onegu is left alone in that house. What do you want us to do about it? It's not like scum mocsta, he killed himself. Do you think it was scum's plan for mocsta to modkill himself?

I've been doubtful of DI all game, but everytime he has come to some kind of conclusion, even if he doesn't share his reasoning which is dumb from a town perspective, I tend to agree with the conclusion.

On August 18 2013 07:00 Grackaroni wrote:
Shits going down. I'm content to lynch Johnnywup since we won't even get him in lord shots tonight and he has the best chance of anyone to flip scum.

I did use my pm's, I talked a whole bunch with Mocsta to try to get a better read on him because I wasn't confident he would flip scum when everybody else was throwing him to the wolves. I also talked a bit to Rayn and he seemed to be genuinely convinced Mocsta was scum so I don't think he is the best lynch for today,

##Vote: Johnnywup


I'd like to point out that this is fucking sketchy.
Has anyone that's been in pms with grack had a townie feeling off of him?

Grack why are you not in the thread doing shit. Or johnny, or sharrant.
Like fuck.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 08:00 GMT
#4205
On August 18 2013 11:25 johnnywup wrote:
i changed my mind. i don't care if you don't believe me. though the red check on a green does make me more suspicious again


How?
Also can you stop making useless posts like this please?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 09:51 GMT
#4208
On August 18 2013 18:15 Risen wrote:
"Everyone is aware onegu is left alone in that house. What do you want us to do about it? It's not like scum mocsta, he killed himself. Do you think it was scum's plan for mocsta to modkill himself?"

I'm implying that one of two things is happening.

1) Mafia is setting up the lynch on Mocsta today with a red check from shar and used KP on onegu last night and will be finishing him off tonight.
2) Onegu is scumlord and the red check is to prevent mocsta from screwing with the vote so scum could control a house.


This relies on onegu sharrant and DI all being on the scumteam.
...which actually doesn't sound that farfetched.

I wish I could bring myself to put some more effort in this game at this point, however.
I'm just kinda posting and going off memory, I really can't bring myself to re-read stuff right now.... I will do so tonight, though.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 09:57 GMT
#4211
On August 18 2013 18:55 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 18 2013 18:51 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 18 2013 18:15 Risen wrote:
"Everyone is aware onegu is left alone in that house. What do you want us to do about it? It's not like scum mocsta, he killed himself. Do you think it was scum's plan for mocsta to modkill himself?"

I'm implying that one of two things is happening.

1) Mafia is setting up the lynch on Mocsta today with a red check from shar and used KP on onegu last night and will be finishing him off tonight.
2) Onegu is scumlord and the red check is to prevent mocsta from screwing with the vote so scum could control a house.


This relies on onegu sharrant and DI all being on the scumteam.
...which actually doesn't sound that farfetched.

I wish I could bring myself to put some more effort in this game at this point, however.
I'm just kinda posting and going off memory, I really can't bring myself to re-read stuff right now.... I will do so tonight, though.


Hmm. Does anyone else have an HP check left to confirm that Sharrant has low HP? Otherwise we should see the truth tomorrow (unless scum want to risk the pretty big risk of Sharrant actually doing regular alignment checks every day and just lying about the HP check thing for when he was roleblocked).


I do..... wait...
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 10:10 GMT
#4214
I guess I'm up for lynching johnny but it's for the wrong reasons.
I have no idea if he's scum or town, he's completely null and useless. Don't want him around at lylo.

I kinda wanna lynch grack just because of this post
On August 18 2013 07:00 Grackaroni wrote:
Shits going down. I'm content to lynch Johnnywup since we won't even get him in lord shots tonight and he has the best chance of anyone to flip scum.

I did use my pm's, I talked a whole bunch with Mocsta to try to get a better read on him because I wasn't confident he would flip scum when everybody else was throwing him to the wolves. I also talked a bit to Rayn and he seemed to be genuinely convinced Mocsta was scum so I don't think he is the best lynch for today,

##Vote: Johnnywup


I dunno how johnny has "the best chance of flipping scum" but that's a silly statement that means nothing.
I can't tell if this post is scum just consolidating on a townie without much thought, or a bus because johnny is a lost cause, however I do know that a townie does not post this.

Apparently he was talking to mocsta in pms, when everyone else wanted to kill him, because he wasn't confident in the lynch. Was anyone aware of this? I sure as hell wasn't.
I don't understand why, as a townie, you would INSTEAD of saying in the thread "hey guys, I'm not too confident in this lynch/shot" you go talk to the guy who is up for getting lynched/shot??
Clearly you didn't show the fact that you doubt he's scum with him, because he fucking gave up on the game.

This is a classic scumpost. Consolidate without reasons. Try to get towncred by opposing a lynch/shot on a townie (after his flip, might I add) and give out a random townread (on rayn)

FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 14:03 GMT
#4225
I'm going with dandel on this one I don't really get why onegu trying to be part of the towncircle makes him town.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 14:53 GMT
#4229
On August 18 2013 23:34 strongandbig wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 18 2013 19:10 Clarity_nl wrote:
I guess I'm up for lynching johnny but it's for the wrong reasons.
I have no idea if he's scum or town, he's completely null and useless. Don't want him around at lylo.

I kinda wanna lynch grack just because of this post
On August 18 2013 07:00 Grackaroni wrote:
Shits going down. I'm content to lynch Johnnywup since we won't even get him in lord shots tonight and he has the best chance of anyone to flip scum.

I did use my pm's, I talked a whole bunch with Mocsta to try to get a better read on him because I wasn't confident he would flip scum when everybody else was throwing him to the wolves. I also talked a bit to Rayn and he seemed to be genuinely convinced Mocsta was scum so I don't think he is the best lynch for today,

##Vote: Johnnywup


I dunno how johnny has "the best chance of flipping scum" but that's a silly statement that means nothing.
I can't tell if this post is scum just consolidating on a townie without much thought, or a bus because johnny is a lost cause, however I do know that a townie does not post this.

Apparently he was talking to mocsta in pms, when everyone else wanted to kill him, because he wasn't confident in the lynch. Was anyone aware of this? I sure as hell wasn't.
I don't understand why, as a townie, you would INSTEAD of saying in the thread "hey guys, I'm not too confident in this lynch/shot" you go talk to the guy who is up for getting lynched/shot??
Clearly you didn't show the fact that you doubt he's scum with him, because he fucking gave up on the game.

This is a classic scumpost. Consolidate without reasons. Try to get towncred by opposing a lynch/shot on a townie (after his flip, might I add) and give out a random townread (on rayn)


Do you disagree with my case on jwup? I think the point about the difference in the way he defended himself in this game versus nwm is good, plus the rest of it. If you disagree I would like to hear why


Yeah that one point is good, and the weird martyr when he wasnt getting lynched was incredibly dumb. The rest of your points in that case feel rather tacked on though. For example the houselist post and saying "he was doing it instead of scumhunting" is kinda silly, someone specifically asked for the list.

Maybe what we can learn from that post though is that either he's a townie that's engaged and was taking notes so basically had the list ready, or he's scum and the list was in his scum qt so he just copy pasted. Johnny hasn't felt engaged in this game, although he's said he has been at least once, so maybe that's scummy?
I really dunno though, he feels like a flip, I don't necessarily have anything against the lynch but I'm not comfortable with it either.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 15:31 GMT
#4235
On August 18 2013 23:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Uhh.. Clarity: Johnnywup clearly did not put thought into that list as you yourself pointed out when he posted it. I asked then and i ask again, what is the point of making the list if you don't even do properly? How does that help town and why would you not do it properly?


?

We're talking about the list with all the housesnames together, yes? He had two people who he wasnt sure of and asked who they were, and I explained...
If he is town, clearly he paid attention during the game, since he couldnt have gone to re-read to make the list, he was too quick for that. That means that if he's town he was taking notes and is clearly taking the game seriously, which he isn't if you look at his other posts. It's a point against him, not for him.

@Onegu .... It feels like you quoted every single one of his posts and put a scummy twist on it. For example, his opening post when he says iamp hadn't done anything in thread at that point, he was correct.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 15:46 GMT
#4237
On August 19 2013 00:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yeah i get that Clarity. I just don't understand as he "clearly had put effort in keeping track of who is in which house" why had he not paid enough attention to know in which house Vivax/Gumshoe was, as it was pretty clear if he had actually paid attention.


I can't remember at what point someone said what house gumshoe was in but we never mentioned vivax in stark so I can understand missing that.

In fact, that's an argument for him being town. Surely someone in the scumteam would make the houselist and put it in the qt ASAP? The fact that he had two names missing makes him more likely town.
It's a very weak argument either way, I'm just pointing out that snb calling that post scummy is just silly.
No reason to dwell on it.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 16:14 GMT
#4239
So you think he's scum for posting that list and asking who gumshoe/vivax are in? As opposed to just posting the list?
I really have issues following your train of thought rayn
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 16:36 GMT
#4241
On August 19 2013 01:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
omfg. Am i really this bad expressing myself or waht the fuck is going on here?

Amongst other reasons i think he is scum because he posted the list without acctually putting a single thought on it. Having the list in the first place as you said is an indication that he has been keeping track of in which house do people belong to. He contradicts this behavior by not actually keeping track of something he finds important (by missing Vivax/gumshoe). Posting or not posting the list has nothing to do with that as it was asked to do.

After that you said him missing Vivax/gumshoe makes him more likely to be town, i disagree and showed you what could the scum motivation mean. Him missing them in itself is not alignment indicative, but when you add that with the fact jwup has been keeping track of this important thing and then not actually doing so it is scummy.


He posted the list because someone asked for the list, it's not alignment indicative.

What you're saying is this, yes?:
The fact that he apparently paid enough attention to have constructed the list either makes him caring town or scum.
Since he hasn't done anything other than that, that might be considered scummy.

Here's the thing, rayn, I already said all of this.

Maybe what we can learn from that post though is that either he's a townie that's engaged and was taking notes so basically had the list ready, or he's scum and the list was in his scum qt so he just copy pasted. Johnny hasn't felt engaged in this game, although he's said he has been at least once, so maybe that's scummy?


I don't know how you manage to twist the fact that he's missing vivax and gumshoe on the list into somehow being scum, that's just dumb.

I refuse to dig for the post that says which house gumshoe is in, but I bet it's easy to miss.
As I've said multiple times, I'm not against the lynch. snb asked me what I thought of his case and I explained why most points are null, rather than scum oriented. Why must you always go 10 rounds with everyone rayn, it's so damn annoying.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 16:45 GMT
#4245
I don't really care.

I feel like rayn's babysitter.
Onegu not doing crap, active lurking, addressing the most useless point in my whole post.

How about we just lynch them?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 16:48 GMT
#4246
On August 19 2013 01:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Because people seem to pay zero attention to why people post what they do rather than what they do post which i think is not the right way to play mafia.


Someone asks for a houselist, johnny posts a houselist. snb calls it scummy. I call it null.
Then you say if it was town he would have known where vivax and gumshoe would have been, as if he wouldn't have known as scum.

Here's the town reasoning to post the list: someone asked, so you contribute
Here's the scum reasoning to post the list: someone asked and you might look like you're contributing

UNLESS YOU CAN TELL ME WHY IT'S #2, JUST STFU ABOUT IT

Like, I'm so tired of this discussion holy fuck. I dunno how you can be so logically inept yet still yell at everyone else but "not playing the right way"
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 16:51 GMT
#4248
On August 19 2013 01:51 Koshi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2013 01:48 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 01:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Because people seem to pay zero attention to why people post what they do rather than what they do post which i think is not the right way to play mafia.


Someone asks for a houselist, johnny posts a houselist. snb calls it scummy. I call it null.
Then you say if it was town he would have known where vivax and gumshoe would have been, as if he wouldn't have known as scum.

Here's the town reasoning to post the list: someone asked, so you contribute
Here's the scum reasoning to post the list: someone asked and you might look like you're contributing

UNLESS YOU CAN TELL ME WHY IT'S #2, JUST STFU ABOUT IT

Like, I'm so tired of this discussion holy fuck. I dunno how you can be so logically inept yet still yell at everyone else but "not playing the right way"

rayn his point is that because Johnny knew Vivax is scum, and johnny knew that Vivax was in Stark because it was in the scum QT. Johnny was afraid to put Vivax in house Stark in his list because he could get flak for it if it wasn't said in the thread. But it was said in the thread, and a town Johnny would have seen it.

Something in those lines.


Which is, I say again, the dumbest thing ever.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 16:56 GMT
#4250
I quit.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 17:03 GMT
#4254
I cover all angles in one concise post and then rayn shows up and makes the game two pages longer with no gain. Saying things I already covered in my one post, making a dumb statement about johnny being scum for absurd reasons.
I even explain TWICE how there's no fucking reason to continue going on about it, but I guess that message didn't come across.

Congratulations rayn, two games in a row you've made a daycycle completely unbearable.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 17:19 GMT
#4256
So not only are you saying he's scum, you're saying he's scum who hasn't lied about a single townread?
Or you're saying that because he has townreads he's scum?

Why are you analyzing your own play midgame? Yes it's VERY interesting that you've pushed townies all game. Pretty sure most of us were aware of that, if you don't recall everyone yelling at you day 1, and all the other days too pretty much.

There's also no such thing as a "hard soft defense". It's just a hard defense. Do you think scum is comfortable giving out so many definitive reads? Xata is town.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 17:32 GMT
#4260
On August 19 2013 02:25 Risen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2013 02:19 Clarity_nl wrote:
So not only are you saying he's scum, you're saying he's scum who hasn't lied about a single townread?
Or you're saying that because he has townreads he's scum?

Why are you analyzing your own play midgame? Yes it's VERY interesting that you've pushed townies all game. Pretty sure most of us were aware of that, if you don't recall everyone yelling at you day 1, and all the other days too pretty much.

There's also no such thing as a "hard soft defense". It's just a hard defense. Do you think scum is comfortable giving out so many definitive reads? Xata is town.


Except the point of my post is that how can anyone know who I've pushed all game, there's so much unflipped........ So it isn't very interesting that I've pushed townies all game. As a matter of fact, if we lynched who I wanted lynched every day it would go Clarity lynched d1, Yamato d2, Shar and then Vivax d3. Two unflipped, two scum.

So tell me again about how my pushes have been all town this game. Oh wait, they fuckign haven't been.


You're the one who said it. Okay I understand what you're trying to say now.
Apparently xata said you've been pushing townies all game, and you think he scumslipped because he doesn't know the unflipped players' alignment.
I really wish you guys would just say what you mean in a way that's easy to understand.

I think this is a dumb assumption, from where I'm standing you've been pushing townies all game too. When I say that that doesn't mean "you've never pushed scum this game" as much as it means "you've pushed a lot of obvious townies"
Think you're taking it too literal.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 17:36 GMT
#4263
Your targets day 1 were so obviously bad and your post was so massively big I don't think anyone could be bothered to spend 5 paragraphs explaining the obvious.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 17:38 GMT
#4267
On August 19 2013 02:36 Risen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2013 02:32 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 02:25 Risen wrote:
On August 19 2013 02:19 Clarity_nl wrote:
So not only are you saying he's scum, you're saying he's scum who hasn't lied about a single townread?
Or you're saying that because he has townreads he's scum?

Why are you analyzing your own play midgame? Yes it's VERY interesting that you've pushed townies all game. Pretty sure most of us were aware of that, if you don't recall everyone yelling at you day 1, and all the other days too pretty much.

There's also no such thing as a "hard soft defense". It's just a hard defense. Do you think scum is comfortable giving out so many definitive reads? Xata is town.


Except the point of my post is that how can anyone know who I've pushed all game, there's so much unflipped........ So it isn't very interesting that I've pushed townies all game. As a matter of fact, if we lynched who I wanted lynched every day it would go Clarity lynched d1, Yamato d2, Shar and then Vivax d3. Two unflipped, two scum.

So tell me again about how my pushes have been all town this game. Oh wait, they fuckign haven't been.


You're the one who said it. Okay I understand what you're trying to say now.
Apparently xata said you've been pushing townies all game, and you think he scumslipped because he doesn't know the unflipped players' alignment.
I really wish you guys would just say what you mean in a way that's easy to understand.

I think this is a dumb assumption, from where I'm standing you've been pushing townies all game too. When I say that that doesn't mean "you've never pushed scum this game" as much as it means "you've pushed a lot of obvious townies"
Think you're taking it too literal.


It's a very real possibility that I'm taking it too literally, and I accept that. However, another reason for that post was to defend my pushes to a thread that has completely discredited me.

I'll admit, I was down on myself for a bit there, too, but after reading my filter I don't think I've actually been that wrong this game. Bad? Yes. Wrong? It remains to be seen.

That's the message I was trying to send with the post. Xata somehow knowing the alignments of my pushes was just butter on top.


Then I'll ask again why spend so much time analyzing your own play this game?
Saying that

1) I proved I'm not as bad as xata is making me out to be!
2) Xata is scum!

And then saying #1 is more important to you, 2 is just a bonus. Like wtf man.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 17:47 GMT
#4274
On August 19 2013 02:43 Risen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2013 02:38 Koshi wrote:
Risen
So the best lynch for today would be Xatalos?


Fuck no. Best lynch today is Sharrant. Are you kidding me?

Things that still hold true in spite of my massive wrongness

1) Cop-claim asks for advice from unknown on who to check.
2) Cop-claim gets red check on scummy target who the thread is already leaning towards lynching.
3) Cop-claim lives to d4.
4) COP-CLAIM WHO CLAIMED ONE SHOT COP GETS RED CHECK ON NOW CONFIRMED GREEN TARGET. IS THIS FOR REAL.

So we have a cop not playing like a cop should followed by a lie in his claim followed by a red check on a green target when there's no way someone frames mocsta and IT IS DAY 4 WITH A MEDIC DEAD AND A SCUM TEAM NOT KILLING HIM.

How is this just occuring to me rofl. So bad. But sometimes right. That should be my motto.


I don't disagree with this in itself.... but this means that either sharrant has taken damage from scum or a scum ability, or DI is lying about his hp check. Both of which seem unlikely. More unlikely than a framer framing mocsta, a replacement who seems townie despite the person he replaced looking scummy/null.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 17:48 GMT
#4276
On August 19 2013 02:46 Koshi wrote:
Xatalos, DI, Sharrant is your scumteam?

Because with Sharrant scum, DI is confirmed scum as well.


I disagree, plenty of ways for a scum to start super low hp or be super low hp due to using abilities that cost hp. Themed game after all.

It's a possibility though.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 17:49 GMT
#4277
I'd like to say again, to emphasize, that mocsta was arguably the best frame target the night he was checked.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 17:54 GMT
#4284
On August 19 2013 02:49 Risen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2013 02:47 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 02:43 Risen wrote:
On August 19 2013 02:38 Koshi wrote:
Risen
So the best lynch for today would be Xatalos?


Fuck no. Best lynch today is Sharrant. Are you kidding me?

Things that still hold true in spite of my massive wrongness

1) Cop-claim asks for advice from unknown on who to check.
2) Cop-claim gets red check on scummy target who the thread is already leaning towards lynching.
3) Cop-claim lives to d4.
4) COP-CLAIM WHO CLAIMED ONE SHOT COP GETS RED CHECK ON NOW CONFIRMED GREEN TARGET. IS THIS FOR REAL.

So we have a cop not playing like a cop should followed by a lie in his claim followed by a red check on a green target when there's no way someone frames mocsta and IT IS DAY 4 WITH A MEDIC DEAD AND A SCUM TEAM NOT KILLING HIM.

How is this just occuring to me rofl. So bad. But sometimes right. That should be my motto.


I don't disagree with this in itself.... but this means that either sharrant has taken damage from scum or a scum ability, or DI is lying about his hp check. Both of which seem unlikely. More unlikely than a framer framing mocsta, a replacement who seems townie despite the person he replaced looking scummy/null.


How is this so far from the realm of possibility? Three people are dying tonight if things hold steady. How much longer does town really have to lynch scum and keep up with that kill rate?


I dunno, but you're suggesting scum made a powerplay that exposes either 3/4 of their team or their entire team (those numbers make most sense). You were already suspicious of sharrant and some people agreed last daycycle, so a fake redcheck from a scum sharrant would mean that scum think they can win this nightcycle, which seems unlikely (more likely with mocsta killing himself I guess)
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 18:09 GMT
#4292
I don't the deny the possibility of an onegu sharrant DI scumteam. I'm not convinced, though.
If this is the team though, then I blame the loss on snb because at this point I would check sharrant and confirm or deny DI's claim.

I'm gonna re-read a bit later and come to some form of conclusion... I might actually be willing to go with an onegu lynch, actually. I think in both scenarios he has a decent chance of flipping scum, and I believe johnny is a coinflip.
The amount of wrong that I've been this game is pretty annoying though.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 18:15 GMT
#4295
On August 19 2013 03:14 Risen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2013 03:06 Grackaroni wrote:
@Risen I actually like the thoughts you had of the possibility of a DI,Sharrant,Acro scum team but that seems like a lot of risks for a scum team to make when there was no chance this was going to be the final lynch.


Mocsta was the lynch 100%

Mocsta lynched, night falls. Scum kills three people strategically and vote for themselves as lords because lords are voted in by majority. If they get lord they get additional KP and vote, if they don't get lord at least in some places where there's now only two people one of whom is scum (see three strategical kills part) there's no lord and town doesn't get a vote.



This is all correct regardless of sharrant being scum or not.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 18:17 GMT
#4297
On August 19 2013 03:16 Risen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2013 03:15 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:14 Risen wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:06 Grackaroni wrote:
@Risen I actually like the thoughts you had of the possibility of a DI,Sharrant,Acro scum team but that seems like a lot of risks for a scum team to make when there was no chance this was going to be the final lynch.


Mocsta was the lynch 100%

Mocsta lynched, night falls. Scum kills three people strategically and vote for themselves as lords because lords are voted in by majority. If they get lord they get additional KP and vote, if they don't get lord at least in some places where there's now only two people one of whom is scum (see three strategical kills part) there's no lord and town doesn't get a vote.



This is all correct regardless of sharrant being scum or not.


And what made it so Mocsta was the lynch 100%

((the red check on Mocsta from Shar))


Which could be either sharrant being scum or mocsta being framed. If there is a scum framer mocsta was the most likely target. You're talking in circles.

How do you feel about an onegu lynch?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 18:25 GMT
#4303
On August 19 2013 03:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2013 03:17 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:16 Risen wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:15 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:14 Risen wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:06 Grackaroni wrote:
@Risen I actually like the thoughts you had of the possibility of a DI,Sharrant,Acro scum team but that seems like a lot of risks for a scum team to make when there was no chance this was going to be the final lynch.


Mocsta was the lynch 100%

Mocsta lynched, night falls. Scum kills three people strategically and vote for themselves as lords because lords are voted in by majority. If they get lord they get additional KP and vote, if they don't get lord at least in some places where there's now only two people one of whom is scum (see three strategical kills part) there's no lord and town doesn't get a vote.



This is all correct regardless of sharrant being scum or not.


And what made it so Mocsta was the lynch 100%

((the red check on Mocsta from Shar))


Which could be either sharrant being scum or mocsta being framed. If there is a scum framer mocsta was the most likely target. You're talking in circles.

How do you feel about an onegu lynch?

Clarity, why was Mocsta a likely frame target? And what do you think of Sharrant saying the opposite when he was questioned about why he did check Mocsta?


I don't recall him explaining his reasoning for why he checked mocsta, but I bet it's about the same as the reasons I call mocsta a likely frame target.

Clarity, why was Mocsta a likely frame target?


Fuck you.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 18:27 GMT
#4305
On August 19 2013 03:24 Onegu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2013 03:17 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:16 Risen wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:15 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:14 Risen wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:06 Grackaroni wrote:
@Risen I actually like the thoughts you had of the possibility of a DI,Sharrant,Acro scum team but that seems like a lot of risks for a scum team to make when there was no chance this was going to be the final lynch.


Mocsta was the lynch 100%

Mocsta lynched, night falls. Scum kills three people strategically and vote for themselves as lords because lords are voted in by majority. If they get lord they get additional KP and vote, if they don't get lord at least in some places where there's now only two people one of whom is scum (see three strategical kills part) there's no lord and town doesn't get a vote.



This is all correct regardless of sharrant being scum or not.


And what made it so Mocsta was the lynch 100%

((the red check on Mocsta from Shar))


Which could be either sharrant being scum or mocsta being framed. If there is a scum framer mocsta was the most likely target. You're talking in circles.

How do you feel about an onegu lynch?



Jeez why would I make the grack case as scum? And you made a incorrect statement I showed you were wrong. Besides grack is scum, and the first point is more about him throwing shit back at the person who called him out instead of just scum hunting, and ignoreing the person who hadnt done much.


Yeah you're right, scum don't ever make cases, my mistake. Good argument.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 18:32 GMT
#4311
On August 19 2013 03:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2013 03:25 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:17 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:16 Risen wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:15 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:14 Risen wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:06 Grackaroni wrote:
@Risen I actually like the thoughts you had of the possibility of a DI,Sharrant,Acro scum team but that seems like a lot of risks for a scum team to make when there was no chance this was going to be the final lynch.


Mocsta was the lynch 100%

Mocsta lynched, night falls. Scum kills three people strategically and vote for themselves as lords because lords are voted in by majority. If they get lord they get additional KP and vote, if they don't get lord at least in some places where there's now only two people one of whom is scum (see three strategical kills part) there's no lord and town doesn't get a vote.



This is all correct regardless of sharrant being scum or not.


And what made it so Mocsta was the lynch 100%

((the red check on Mocsta from Shar))


Which could be either sharrant being scum or mocsta being framed. If there is a scum framer mocsta was the most likely target. You're talking in circles.

How do you feel about an onegu lynch?

Clarity, why was Mocsta a likely frame target? And what do you think of Sharrant saying the opposite when he was questioned about why he did check Mocsta?


I don't recall him explaining his reasoning for why he checked mocsta, but I bet it's about the same as the reasons I call mocsta a likely frame target.

Clarity, why was Mocsta a likely frame target?


Fuck you.

Sharrant said on D3 end his scumreads were Koshi and SnB. Now if Sharrant is town and scum have a framer why the fuck would they frame Mocsta over Koshi/SnB?

You are not even reading the posts you are arguing about and somehow you get to say "fuck you" to me. Now again, why do you think Mocsta was the most likely frame target?


On August 19 2013 02:47 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2013 02:43 Risen wrote:
On August 19 2013 02:38 Koshi wrote:
Risen
So the best lynch for today would be Xatalos?


Fuck no. Best lynch today is Sharrant. Are you kidding me?

Things that still hold true in spite of my massive wrongness

1) Cop-claim asks for advice from unknown on who to check.
2) Cop-claim gets red check on scummy target who the thread is already leaning towards lynching.
3) Cop-claim lives to d4.
4) COP-CLAIM WHO CLAIMED ONE SHOT COP GETS RED CHECK ON NOW CONFIRMED GREEN TARGET. IS THIS FOR REAL.

So we have a cop not playing like a cop should followed by a lie in his claim followed by a red check on a green target when there's no way someone frames mocsta and IT IS DAY 4 WITH A MEDIC DEAD AND A SCUM TEAM NOT KILLING HIM.

How is this just occuring to me rofl. So bad. But sometimes right. That should be my motto.


I don't disagree with this in itself.... but this means that either sharrant has taken damage from scum or a scum ability, or DI is lying about his hp check. Both of which seem unlikely. More unlikely than a framer framing mocsta, a replacement who seems townie despite the person he replaced looking scummy/null.

FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 18:54 GMT
#4328
Dat fear mongering.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 19:15 GMT
#4332
onegu is a good lynch because of his reaction to the pressure.
Risen should agree to it because onegu's scum in his conspiracy theory, no? Or was it acro?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 21:56 GMT
#4341
Yeah lynch johnny it's whatever. I never got the townie feeling off onegu that you got xata but trusted you on that so far. That said his instant martyr under pressure and playing on peoples fears of mislynching screams scum to me, could just be bad town play. At least he gave us a list of people he thinks are scum so I guess... blah
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 23:35 GMT
#4347
Nothing townlike from johnny, nothing scumlike from johnny.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 18 2013 23:47 GMT
#4348
Except for you know, not doing shit when people want you lynched. Although that's not so much scumlike as it is dumblike.
That said, scum have been remarkably co operative when it came to rolling over and dying.

It's like shooting fish in a barrel. You shoot into the barrel, and it doesn't matter if you hit, because the shockwave kills the fish and it just floats to the surface. This analogy is excellent because I think calling bad scum "fish" is great.

If a townie is somehow a fish and floats to the surface, then I just blame the townie for being a dumbass. Why would you be in a barrel, town-fish?
This is why the scumfish have a chance in barrels, because townfish are also in barrels.

Let's just empty the fucking barrel on the ground and kill all the fish slowly, yes?

/end scene
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 19 2013 00:26 GMT
#4352
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 19 2013 11:27 GMT
#4363
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 09:18 GMT
#4466
Mocsta trying to defend what he did in post game is just disgusting. Ace as well.

I played badly. I'm glad that despite that dumb start d1 I was able to establish my towniness, it's the one thing I'm good at.
It seems I was onto scum a couple of times though, although I never followed through.

I thought chrom was total scum but townies called him town because of pm reasons. I should have realized though that when I knew solstice was vigi and he acted THROUGH chrom, that that was why he was being called town and should have revisited him.
I thought mocsta was town but a redcheck is a redcheck, I wasn't convinced on his lynch/shot yet though, that's why I said "contribute now" and he just fucking kills himself.
Acro played well, especially d2.

I dunno how to catch rayn or koshi as mafia because rayn shits up the thread as either alignment and koshi is just kinda around doing nothing as either alignment.
I also couldn't convince anyone of rayn despite him being a great lynch. I've never tunneled anyone so hard and in the end gave up because I got no traction on it, and then mocsta instead of going "yeah lynch rayn!" he just suicided.

Risen... I'll break down that first post of yours today at some point, as per request.

On August 20 2013 18:07 Dandel Ion wrote:
Also the setup would be better if town actually did anything.
But nobody did.

I was like the only one to even scumhunt n0, l0l


but at least I have conclusively proven that dandel >>>>>>>> solstice, that's the only important thing.


This is mean DI. I think you play well and you have good intuition, but you make it hard for people to listen to you because your train of thought is not put in thread, just your conclusion. It makes it hard to read you.

We also had solstice and sharrant, the two people that were almost NEVER going to get lynched, and they lurk like fuck.
If we had not just me and xata as obvtownies, but those two as well IN THE THREAD we probably would have rolled over scum.

There's also kush. I refuse to even attempt to get a read on this guy. He claims he hasn't tried in a towngame for 5 games, yet he still signs up. I really do not understand what he gets out of mafia but it lessens my enjoyment when he's in the game.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 09:20 GMT
#4469
On August 20 2013 18:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yes i understand, but you were the one that draw the assumption that i was "only bluehunting", which i wasn't. :D
And my argument on Onegu was not WIFOMy, maybe it looked like that to you because you had a townread on him. It was, simple logic, let's compare:
1) "Xata&Clarity got roleblocked N1 -> Vivax flipped mafia RB -> unless mafia rb'd one of their own on N1 at least one of them has to be town" Q: Did mafia roleblock one of their own?
2) "Onegu thinks there is a town rb -> Onegu thinks town rb'd Xata N1 -> Onegu thinks SnB is the only one alive who was suspicious of Xata D1 end" Q: What is Onegu's logic for having SnB as a suspect? Why does he think SnB is not likely to be the town rb, and why does he not investigate more on that matter? What if SnB is mafia rb? Why does Onegu not give a crap about that?


Dude I broke that shit down. You had to either call me scum for the same logic, or call me scum for being angry with you, both were terrible reasons and it SCREAMED scum making stuff up on the spot.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 09:21 GMT
#4470
On August 20 2013 18:20 Dandel Ion wrote:
I'm very easy to read.
People just refuse to do it.


I had a townread on you most of the game, but you had a lurking session around d2 d3 that made me nervous about you. That's not that weird, is it?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 09:27 GMT
#4477
On August 20 2013 18:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2013 18:20 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 20 2013 18:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yes i understand, but you were the one that draw the assumption that i was "only bluehunting", which i wasn't. :D
And my argument on Onegu was not WIFOMy, maybe it looked like that to you because you had a townread on him. It was, simple logic, let's compare:
1) "Xata&Clarity got roleblocked N1 -> Vivax flipped mafia RB -> unless mafia rb'd one of their own on N1 at least one of them has to be town" Q: Did mafia roleblock one of their own?
2) "Onegu thinks there is a town rb -> Onegu thinks town rb'd Xata N1 -> Onegu thinks SnB is the only one alive who was suspicious of Xata D1 end" Q: What is Onegu's logic for having SnB as a suspect? Why does he think SnB is not likely to be the town rb, and why does he not investigate more on that matter? What if SnB is mafia rb? Why does Onegu not give a crap about that?


Dude I broke that shit down. You had to either call me scum for the same logic, or call me scum for being angry with you, both were terrible reasons and it SCREAMED scum making stuff up on the spot.

I actually called you scum because of "you refusing to give me information to figure out your alignment better". I know i was not clear enough but it was 50% my fault and 50% you yelling at me for nothing.


Either way it was dumb because you were asking me to go back to read day 1 so I can figure out who has a scumread on me d1. That or you were asking me what I remember from memory and then you would manipulate it the same way you manipulated onegu's answer.

And then onegu gets slight pressure and he martyrs. FUUUUUUUUU
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 09:34 GMT
#4480
I'm just surprised the whole thing with me snb and oats blew up so hard in thread.

I don't play pm games often but what I find is that if you can throw someone off their game, you get a lot more information out of their reaction than 20 pms back and forth talking about shit (n0, at least)
Oats asked me for my rolename and I didn't give it. It was partly because I wanted to wifom if I was blue (draw a roleblock or a nk) but partly because it's a themed game and there ARE possible roles that kill people that know your rolename.

Twice it's been mentioned in postgame that town shouldn't have co ordinated their kp shots at night, I don't really understand why that would be the case though. Unlike a single 1-shot vigi, having 6 vigis that do almost no damage and not co ordinating them seems like a disaster, especially when it comes to hp checks afterwards. Why not use it as a 2nd lynch that we can discuss in thread? Where exactly is the downside?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-20 09:37:10
August 20 2013 09:36 GMT
#4482
from scum qt, rayn:
That's what you get for bussing me for no reason.. seriously, there has been no reason to buss me at any point of the game. My argument about Onegu/Clarity was logically perfectly fine whether or not it was wrong or right. All i needed was one smart dude to say "you can both be right, stop it". Apparently town has no smart people left.


No, it didn't make sense. I've had this problem before as scum where I start to believe my own bullshit, but it was still bullshit.

On August 20 2013 18:35 Xatalos wrote:
Scum really had several strong players (and Koshi excels in making me think he's town -.-) so I don't feel too bad. I hope I'm scum next though. I enjoy knowing everything and having 100% trusted allies much more than walking in the dark.


I trusted you! sealbuddies4life
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 09:39 GMT
#4486
On August 20 2013 18:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
The downside is that nobody ever discussed it in thread later on. :D
We affected the shots so much with our presence it was impossible to track onto anyone specificaly. Everyone looked as good/bad because of the shots. For example, on D1 end we basically decided with iamp who to shoot, he gave all town targets so i was okay with it. Nobody else seemed to give a shit about the house KP.


We had a lot of lurkers though.
gumshoe, kush.. they weren't bad targets. It's just like a lynch. You look back and see who wanted who shot and later put the pieces together.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 09:48 GMT
#4491
All good. This game was pretty enjoyable, the setup is neat. I don't like using TL pms only though I guess I understand why that's the case. Hard to construct something when you have to answer within 10 seconds on irc.

Modkills and lurkers though. I wasn't kidding that by the time mocsta killed himself I just didn't care anymore.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 09:51 GMT
#4495
I hate it when a qt gets too long and removes the button "all messages"
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 10:01 GMT
#4502
Thanks
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 10:05 GMT
#4505
Nah I believe it when he says he'll try to work with me better. I don't really understand why I have issues with the way rayn posts or explains things. I don't have an issue with rayn as a person or anything, just wanna make that clear, seems like a cool dude.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 10:09 GMT
#4508
Oh and btw FirmTofu, you weren't wrong about your "meta read" on me in your deathpost. The thing is though, you have to consider that I took some heat d1 that made it harder for me to scumhunt.
I don't know if that's my mistake (the pm "lie" was obviously), but when the pressure is on me, which doesn't happen often when I'm town, I have trouble scumhunting. Don't really know why.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 11:25 GMT
#4515
At least i had a good track of who was convincing/who was not and who would do what kind of shit in town. Only thing i fucked up was that on D3 i thought Clarity would lead the town over Xatalos onto SnB lynch (although Vivax helped the town alot in that :/ ).


Yeah. While I wasn't convinced on vivax mainly because he played anti wincon regardless of his alignment, I wasn't against his lynch. There's no point to me saying that in thread though. If I'm pressuring snb that hard and at the same time explain that I'm fine with a vivax lynch then that takes pressure away from snb.

That claim was kinda silly though. Everyone was right to immediately jump on it. I always like to think through the possibilities and talk it through with others before just changing my vote though. I dunno if that looks scummy or whatever.
When I'm town I hardly ever think about if I look scummy, I think that works. Despite soft defending vivax no one ever went "oh clarity might be scum". The only scum that pushed me (kinda) was rayn and even then his argument was that I wasn't making myself readable because I stopped answering his questions which is a silly stance considering the rest of the game, and was never going to get me lynched.

My problem is is that I get myself in a position where I'll never get lynched, and I try to use that to push town goals including being traffic cop when I think it's needed, but my scumhunting is sorely lacking so I can't really lead town into victory.
What I do think however, is that 2-3 townies lurking makes the game 5x as hard.

I think I've learned that I don't really like pm games. It's really cool to have a super strong townread (like xata in this game) where I can just bounce ideas off of, but there were so many times where people were saying someone was town because of pm reasons (I did this once, and it was solstice cause he claimed 2 shot vig), and it made it hard to scumhunt when you just hit a brick wall like that. This was specifically the case with chrom, who I said was scummy in thread all day but enough people called town in pms that I just couldn't bring myself to go against that.

Yamato here's a question for you, what do you classify as a "strong suspicion"? Because I always end up with a really strong read one way or the other, but the longer the game goes the more people have "some of column A (townie), some of column B (townie)" and my read weakens and gets closer to null.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 11:41 GMT
#4517
I think I trick people into thinking I played well or something cause someone said that in titanic too and I feel I played badly in both. I just suck at finding scum. Like I'm really bad at it. And when I do find scum I can't get them lynched and lose confidence in my read.

I'm sure I'll get better at scumhunting if I just continue playing, which is what I'll do, but it's hard to see if I'm progressing or not.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-20 11:57:40
August 20 2013 11:53 GMT
#4521
I think most townies (me at least) had kinda conceded at that point. Like I don't mean to harp on it too much but mocsta modkill really did stop any momentum town had.

Actually acro if I go back to my d1 notes there's two points that point to you being scum, but I never really revisited my notes

onegu strongly against sharing house lists
onegu quick to defend and call people town, is he scum?

dandel super pressure on koshi makes him look town, dunno about koshi though, titanic makes me uncertain about him

kush is kush. If he ends up being right about stuff he's probably scum.

snb pressures me but then backs off when he notices there's nothing more to say and concludes it's not enough to say I'm scum, totes town.
oats is town for pm reasons

Risen mega posts with bad reads. DI calls it out, iamp soft defends

still no scumreads from onegu

acro calls out vivax for soft defense on oats

solstice wall of defense is MASSIVE, weird scum(?)read on johnny
townread on DI but didnt wanna vote him for lord cause... DL would out himself as scum?

decent defense from johnny, null

acro hard defense on johnny

rayn and acro shit up the thread with pm stuff, rayn looks pretty town but illogical
oberyn votes acro for "stealing" his plan, acro says he wasnt aware that obe posted it in thread
acro doesnt look scummy in this exchange though, johnny pointed out the same
oberyn starts pressuring acro, definitely looks like he wants him lynched

iamp calls out lurkers, xata says they should use kp on lurkers pre d1 flip

xata points out that acro and oberyn can't both be scum, I agree
He seems friendly and helpful to my ideas but his conclusion everytime is "could be, could not be, dunno"

Acro unvotes solstice after "a good night sleep and the urging of iamp and johnny"


I also thought snb was totes town d1, dunno when that changed.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 12:09 GMT
#4523
Risen's opening post really was too crazy to be scum though.
I've never seen a scum give 6 scumreads, 4 of which were clear town and 2 of which were null.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 12:44 GMT
#4527
I tried really hard to get scum to shoot solstice btw, why did that not work?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 12:50 GMT
#4530
Oh... right

I'm dumb
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 12:51 GMT
#4531
On August 20 2013 21:45 Xatalos wrote:
Wait, did Ace post something else before being modkilled? Because all I noticed was "hosts kill me please trolololol"?


Basically he thought what I thought for a brief second when reading vivax flip.
I thought instead of houselist the role pm gave away the scumteam. I guess ace just reacted to that, which modconfirmed him town.

I really don't think ace and mocsta should be punished in the same way, I do believe ace just made a dumb mistake.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 13:18 GMT
#4533
How much did solstice tell chrom. Just that he was a vigi or the fact that he gains hp equal to the damage he deals?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 14:38 GMT
#4548
I think defining a lurker is hard.

Like, sharrant and solstice felt like lurkers this game, but were they? I dunno.
Kush felt like a lurker too...

Like, I feel like I use the term lurker for "not really active anti-town"
I believe there are players who can have 1-2 pages of filter a day and be extremely pro-town, and I wouldn't consider those lurkers.

But anyway, it's annoying. I guess people get different things out of mafia than me when they sign up.

I kinda wanna suggest that some hosts not allow people who have the tendency to lurk but that just seems a bit elitist and arbitrary.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-20 14:48:00
August 20 2013 14:40 GMT
#4550
On August 20 2013 23:39 marvellosity wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2013 23:38 Clarity_nl wrote:
I kinda wanna suggest that some hosts not allow people who have the tendency to lurk but that just seems a bit elitist and arbitrary.


If I ever hosted a mini, I would do this.


How would you define a lurker in that case marv?

edit: you should totally host a mini
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 14:54 GMT
#4554
I kinda like minis. 2 scum 7 town is cool. That said, in most cases scum get completely rolled by an active town in games like that unless there are some very experienced scum players.

A 13 player or 15 player games like that would be cool though. Could always host a game and say "just /in even if you're in a game or waiting for one to start, we'll figure out a date to start when full, preferably when none of the players are in an ongoing game"
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 15:14 GMT
#4557
On August 21 2013 00:03 s0Lstice wrote:
Gmarshal had a wisdom of the crowds rule in his games where people could vote out someone who signed up. That's a good idea.

With the state of the forum right now though...something that makes signups slower is gonna be excruciating in its own right.

Clarity..I told you in a PM and ill tell you again. Lots of eurozone folks in this game made it really difficult to be involved in thread discussion. The thread was most active during business hours over here. I felt like a lurker to you because we rarely were posting at the same time. When I got back and had time to play there usually wasn't anyone around that really would have helped to talk to.


I realize that, but some piece of analysis that you put in thread won't be ignored because it was posted when we weren't around. You were basically a vet with your 11 hp, seems like a waste to only post when others are around and therefore not post much at all.
I'm not saying have a conversation with yourself and post 6x in a row, but a concise post with your thoughts of people and the goings on would have made things a bit better for town.

For Sharrant it's the same story, he's basically a nearly confirmed town but he doesn't abuse it in thread.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 15:35 GMT
#4560
Unless you convince a different townie to agree with you and he can push it home.
But you're right, part of it is me being a bit irrational because it FEELS like you weren't around at all during this game.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 20 2013 17:06 GMT
#4565
On August 21 2013 01:39 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Hey if someone is gonna do a write-up i would appreciate some insight on how to play better next time. Or marv, if you are kind enough could you PM me?


I would like to formally +1 this comment
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-20 17:32:40
August 20 2013 17:27 GMT
#4567
On August 21 2013 02:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 21 2013 02:06 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 21 2013 01:39 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Hey if someone is gonna do a write-up i would appreciate some insight on how to play better next time. Or marv, if you are kind enough could you PM me?


I would like to formally +1 this comment

I can give one opinion. Do not get into shitfests with your scumreads. You clearly did think i was scum on D4. You do not need to convince me i am mafia, you need to convince others. Of course i am not gonna claim scum as scum, instead try to interact with others (when you have reached a conclusion) and convince them. You certainly had enough town credit to maybe even get me lynched, but you wasted your time arguing with me instead of convincing others (that usually leads you into a situation where noone even remembers what the original argument was).

It does not even matter if you are right or wrong in your argument, if you get me lynched and i flip scum, you won. If you do not get me lynched you lost.


Yeah you're right about that one but I wasn't THAT convinced. I just appeared super convinced cause that's what I do.
So was trying to figure out if you actually were scum or not and by the end I kinda said "fuck it, I dunno"

It does not even matter if you are right or wrong in your argument, if you get me lynched and i flip scum, you won. If you do not get me lynched you lost


I wholeheartedly disagree with this.

edit: like I can't even begin to explain how much it matters that I got to my conclusion for the right reasons
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 21 2013 07:59 GMT
#4580
On August 21 2013 14:34 kushm4sta wrote:
ABOUT THE LURKING, SAYING KUSH WAS A LURKER
nope not true. I read many filters and gave many reads. Did I read the entire thread? not even close.
But I'm sure many other people also don't read the thread, except I am honest about it so I get shit on.

Let me ask, how many HOURS PER DAY is required to play this game????? Because the spammers are out of control, and it took at least 1 hour a day JUST to read the thread (in the beginning).

And what is with this hostile attitude towards people who are behind? like "fuck you kush you were busy yesterday and had a shitty day so now we are going to shit on you for it." Town should facilitate them in catching up.

Oh yeah and the whole not keeping up with the thread thing wouldn't be a problem if town would learn to stfu. Honestly it's usually not a problem late game.
Show nested quote +
Sadly this game, like most other recent games, suffers from the 'too many posts' syndrome. The inherent cause behind this problem is the desire to say everything that comes to their mind. That isn't needed one bit! Not only does this distract you from accomplishing analysis or creating useful plans, it also just mucks up the thread with useless info. How can any forcing information be achieved if your posts are instantly covered up by a dozen spammers? What's the point of putting pressure on someone to get useful info if they can just ignore it and let the rest of the town stash it under a pile of nonsense?



Wasn't calling you a lurker, was explaining how my definition of a lurker is probably flawed.
That said, I truly believe that every single townie in this game kept up with the thread and read the entire thing at least once.
A majority of said town probably read enough filters to have read the game practically twice.
"fuck you kush you were busy yesterday and had a shitty day so now we are going to shit on you for it." Town should facilitate them in catching up.

You don't think that IS us facilitating you to catch up? It's people forcing you to catch up and contribute, and if you don't catch up and contribute then you a liability to town. Do you believe that the entire game should stop because kush, who entered the game of his own free will, decided the game was too long to even read once. You have been in so many mafia games, at this point you KNOW what you're getting yourself into.

The fact that you can enter a game, roll town, and by the end of it confess that you didn't even read the game through ONCE just confirms the reasons I really feel disrespected when you're in a game that I'm also in. Yes, playing mafia takes HOURS a day. It says it in every OP that mafia takes a lot of time, that you get out of it what you put in. Every tutorial I've ever read or even skimmed over has pointed out that you need to put the time in.

Was this game too spammy? Yeah probably. Can that demotivate people? Yeah, it can.
But do not use it as an excuse for you not even reading the entire game through AT LEAST ONCE and then wondering why people call you useless.

I can't believe you just came in this thread and explained that you not reading the entire game that you signed up for is somehow common, and not your fault, but rather the fault of the people who might be a bit overzealous because they're excited about the game and put a lot of effort into it. I'd rather take someone who posts too much but tries to make himself useful over you any day.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-21 08:50:58
August 21 2013 08:21 GMT
#4582
Only explanation I can think of.

That said, I think he genuinely believed it when he said most people probably didn't even read the thread, which just saddens me greatly.

edit: expect rants like this in any aspect of my life really. I'm kind of a party pooper and overly serious about things. But hey, if that's my worst quality then I'll be alright.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 21 2013 08:57 GMT
#4584
On August 21 2013 17:55 Mocsta wrote:
its normal for ppl to form clicks, I.e. surround themselves with similar minded people.

the supposition is that there are others like kushmaster around, and they all congregate. thus nthe natural deduction for someone like kush, is that others would take the same action he takes. a fairly likely possibility.


perhaps, there some funky water in Maine?
gtfo, what u know about Maine...right?


No.....

Nooo......

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Although yeah I completely get that, I make that mistake plenty myself, doesn't mean people shouldn't correct me when I'm horribly wrong!
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-21 11:49:30
August 21 2013 11:49 GMT
#4587
Directly from the goddamn OP:

The game is typically very active, so the thread will get big quickly. However, it is essential to read the thread to play the game. If you do not have the time or patience to read the whole thread, do not play. I will not compensate for ignorance.


Directly from the general guide to play mafia sticky on this forum:

Be warned: Mafia requires a time commitment. This generally depends on the player, but at minimum 1 to 2 hours a day of solid effort is required. Some players spend as much as 8 or 10 hours a day playing Mafia. More time spent gives you a better chance at making the right decisions, but you can do a very acceptable job with just 1 to 2 hours a day. Mafia games typically last between 1 and 2 weeks, but usually you will die at some point before it ends.


edit: ninjad
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-21 14:30:41
August 21 2013 14:29 GMT
#4598
On August 21 2013 23:22 kushm4sta wrote:
ya the op says you need time to play, but how am I supposed to know how much time I need. I guess the base time is 15min/day then you add an hour per day for every spammer signed up for the game?


Are you sure you're an actual person, kush?

On August 21 2013 23:29 strongandbig wrote:
I actually agree with kush. The game should take an hour to play per day, no longer. If you're demanding people spend more than 1 hour of full, attentive play, you're gonna kill your game anyway by limiting the player pool.

We need more post count limit games.


Hour a day is fine.

Do you believe it's unfair to demand that a player at least read the entire game that he's a part of?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-21 14:56:04
August 21 2013 14:54 GMT
#4602
I'm just baffled that kush just gets to say that he didn't even read some of the game and be fine, and everyone else is fine too. I guess he's like that dull pain in the back of your head that you just kinda zone out after a while.

and just like a headache I just wanna shut the blinds and crawl into bed and wait until it's gone.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 21 2013 18:40 GMT
#4609
It's postgame xata you can edit
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 22 2013 09:47 GMT
#4621
Lol.

Mocsta... NEVER PLAY MAFIA AGAIN UMGG

Nah, if he's sitting out A game that's fine. Permanent ban is if you consistently call someone's mother a whore, then post porn in the thread and then stream a live execution of your dog on the internet..... and post your scumlist etc.
Players shouldn't be impartial at all to stuff like this though, mocsta, but koshi needs to put down the pitchfork.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 22 2013 09:58 GMT
#4623
I understand it's your opinion I'm trying to point out why I believe it's excessive. You truly think mocsta deserves a permanent ban for getting himself modkilled? Like, maybe if it's his 5th offense of it or something.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-22 10:22:31
August 22 2013 10:22 GMT
#4629
On August 22 2013 19:06 Koshi wrote:
I don't agree. Imagine I would post my role in the Titanic game and you lynch Stutters after that FT and Cora is demotivated and just surrenders.

Can I ruin 5 games like that before I get permabanned?

I don't want Mocsta banned atm. But it would be cool if the rules became very strict on this matter for the future. I don't see a problem if the OP said "if you get yourself modkilled by purposely breaking these rules you get permabanned." Then followed by a couple rules that should never get broken. Posting something on purpose the get yourself modkilled is one of those rules.


I mean, if you show intent of ruining every game you are entering then yeah, I reckon it would happen a bit sooner.
Do you believe mocsta replaced in this game with the intent of ruining it? Or did it just happen cause things got heated.

edit: ninjad
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-22 14:59:51
August 22 2013 14:56 GMT
#4637
On August 22 2013 23:52 Dandel Ion wrote:
help your team?

I'll remind you that his modkill made the votes from town 3-2 scum to 2-2, essentially fucking any chance to ever lynch scum.


Yep, but the intention was there, which is what matters in these situations.

edit: let me clarify I guess. Mocsta was almost certainly either going to be lynched or shot. He was aware of this and from my perspective (although mocsta has not said this as far as I'm aware) he got himself modkilled because he thought it might benefit town. Yes, it turns out it removed town's majority in votes that cycle but mocsta did not know this at the time, I assume he thought he was making it possible for town to lynch/shoot scum instead of him.
That's not to say I agree that he needs more than a 1 game ban, not sure what I think about this yet, but it's worth discussing

I realize you were just co-hosting marv, but could you explain why the hosts have not really commented on this situation yet?
Or if any other hosts are around, ofcourse.

On August 22 2013 23:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I would really like if GoT hosts brought up the Mocsta issue here. Purposely getting yourself modkilled is ruining the game for everyone. At least that's how i feel. That's the worst thing you can do. Play against your wincon and ruin the game for people. I also remember myself getting a 5 game ban for the same thing. Why are different people treated differently in these kind of situations?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 22 2013 15:01 GMT
#4639
To be fair if we had somehow not lynched mocsta we woulda lynched johnny and still lost.
Can't really blame the loss on mocsta, can blame him for breaking the rules, though.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 22 2013 15:22 GMT
#4642
I guess the question becomes, what is the virtue of giving out a longer ban.
Do we think that mocsta won't get the message with a 1 game ban, do we think that despite 1 game banning this action people will believe intentionally modkilling themselves when under threat of lynch will still be worth it?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-22 15:32:19
August 22 2013 15:32 GMT
#4646
I'd say that shows malicious intent BUT

On August 20 2013 15:33 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2013 15:18 DrParnassus wrote:
moc, yours was malicious. i remember reading that you've never been mislynched.... ragequitting at a critical time for town is not the ideal way to uphold that statistic

It may have been taken that way.

But it was actually for town to move on and get a successful lynch. I didn't predict town would react that way

Either way. I genuinely didn't know it was cheating. If I did. I certainly wouldn't have quit. So I do apologise on those grounds.


I have no real reason to disbelieve this, so I see no real reason to make it longer than 1 game ban, or a 1 week ban or whatever.

The point of the ban is not to make the other players feel good about it. The reason bans exist is to get a point across.
I doubt mocsta will ever do this again, nor will anyone who has read GoT postgame, isn't that enough?
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 22 2013 17:41 GMT
#4650
I don't think anyone here is saying that it's okay
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-22 23:47:18
August 22 2013 23:45 GMT
#4652
It's easy to not get "butthurt" when you are not invested in the game to begin with
It's also completely justified.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 27 2013 18:33 GMT
#4655
Yes writeup please <3
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 27 2013 18:54 GMT
#4661
I liked the pm and house mechanics. I think the problem was that the game was a bit uninteresting for those who never got to be lord (just my perception)
Instead of house kp and hp check I'd like to see some house specific powers. I like rayn's idea of multiple anti town factions too, but that seems hard to pull off.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 27 2013 19:04 GMT
#4665
Well I got to be lord for at least a cycle and that's when I had the most fun playing the game. Not sure how to fix that without basically changing the setup into something else entirely.

About the people posting at night stuff, I never really felt it was a problem (probably because I was town) to just post a or a youtube video or whatever. I never did anything in context with the actualy game... but in hindsight I guess I can see why obs/hosts disagreed. Then again I don't recall an instance where a host went "guys, don't post anything during night not even or pictures or whatever".

Anyway, I liked the fact that except for the house stuff and hp stuff it felt very much like a normal game. I think I prefer that much more than a super heavy themed crazy fest (unless it's greymist, then I love it)
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 27 2013 19:04 GMT
#4666
Lol poor dandel :D
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 27 2013 19:13 GMT
#4669
As for specific issues:
1 hp lord kp isn't very interesting, hp check seems to favor scum a lot... we probably were better off just burning them all d2 as someone suggested post game and anyone that had used his hp check was scum.
Although I really liked the pm mechanic it turns out people use it the wrong way (IMO) because I was unable to read quite a few people because they never posted their thoughts in thread. Maybe make all pms happen during the night? (you get elected n0 you get to talk to lords n1).

I dunno
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 27 2013 19:18 GMT
#4672
On August 28 2013 04:15 Dandel Ion wrote:
silly acro, men can't marry men.

it is known.


it is known
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 27 2013 19:28 GMT
#4675
If town reaches lategame, scum will likely have already used the checks anyway, unless it's been only one lord getting elected all game. Scum can probably nk and wifom around who used the check, since the only way for town to know whether it's been used is to try and use it.

I dunno, I kinda get it but at least make a tweak like anounce when a hp check is used in thread or something like that.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
August 27 2013 19:31 GMT
#4676
To be fair the main problem was that town spilled their guts to scum every chance they got. (heh, got)
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-28 19:06:40
August 28 2013 19:06 GMT
#4679
I like that. Maybe give lords weaker powers but have them available every cycle? The pm circle in itself is quite powerful
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
2025 GSL S2 - Ro8 Group A
CranKy Ducklings182
EnkiAlexander 114
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 131
NeuroSwarm 130
RuFF_SC2 121
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 909
ajuk12(nOOB) 36
Icarus 8
Bale 6
Dota 2
monkeys_forever113
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K800
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor175
Other Games
summit1g12053
C9.Mang01356
shahzam1263
JimRising 573
ViBE269
Maynarde177
ToD169
Mew2King51
WinterStarcraft35
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1376
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH308
• Hupsaiya 96
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki27
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift6018
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
8h 19m
Replay Cast
21h 19m
Replay Cast
1d 7h
RSL Revival
1d 7h
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
2 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
[ Show More ]
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
SC Evo League
5 days
Circuito Brasileiro de…
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-11
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
BLAST Open Fall 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.