|
it's time to go to the next level of wifom behold:
snb is scum because he didn't get modkilled acro is scum because he didn't get shot yet ( he even got shot early in ptp4 and he played like shit there, here he's been lord for 4 cycles)
both being scum also explains why snb didn't act like a complete retard about acro yet, which he "always" does (a very buttwounded man he is)
sharrant and mocsta are both town then because another player in their house is scum then. my money'd be on moc being non-selfaware miller.
last scum is in my house after that probably.
wifom is almost as good as meta. all hail wifom
|
|
|
On August 17 2013 21:00 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 20:58 raynpelikoneet wrote: ffs i was having an argument with Clarity, then he decided he wants to stop the argument when i am not done. With saying "i do not care and don't remember".
It's another thing if we are both town and just think differently, but if you think i am scum because i was trying to have an argument with someone and they start insulting me + fall back from the argument and because i think they are scum because of that you are being ridiculous-. No rayn, you said you thought I was scum to xata. If you somehow did not think I was scum before I answered your dumb question with the truth that I didn't really care, then how do you come to the conclusion that both me and onegu are scum because of a dumb assertion you made BECAUSE I GOT MAD AT YOU.Your thinking is full of holes. Scum making it up as they go along. Hang him. Fuck you. You are straight out lying!
|
This is dumb. I'm a townie. If I had posted a pm meant for snb in thread instead, I contact the hosts and go "fuck sorry should I edit it out?" hosts reply "yeah, and don't do it again" and I do.
Why is that different depending on alignment? Why is it less likely for scum to get modkilled? To me it makes sense for neither alignment to get modkilled.
Like, snb made the mistake and sent me a pm going "fuck", I told him "just edit it out and tell the hosts, I can vouch for the fact that it was a mistake pm and you're not being malicious", which I did tell the hosts, even though snb waited for hosts to tell him to edit it out.
Please comment on my rayn case DI.
|
imo we should lynch snb and shoot mocsta just to be save about the red check.
moc is not full hp either, so he should be in lord kp range.
|
On August 17 2013 21:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 21:00 Clarity_nl wrote:On August 17 2013 20:58 raynpelikoneet wrote: ffs i was having an argument with Clarity, then he decided he wants to stop the argument when i am not done. With saying "i do not care and don't remember".
It's another thing if we are both town and just think differently, but if you think i am scum because i was trying to have an argument with someone and they start insulting me + fall back from the argument and because i think they are scum because of that you are being ridiculous-. No rayn, you said you thought I was scum to xata. If you somehow did not think I was scum before I answered your dumb question with the truth that I didn't really care, then how do you come to the conclusion that both me and onegu are scum because of a dumb assertion you made BECAUSE I GOT MAD AT YOU.Your thinking is full of holes. Scum making it up as they go along. Hang him. Fuck you. You are straight out lying!
When you say someone is lying, it helps to point out what the lie is. This is the second time you've accused me of lying without doing the second part.
You have logic that makes onegu scum I point out it makes me scum too You say I'm scum for being angry at you You did NOT say I am scum because your logic that makes onegu scum applies to me
Ergo, making it up on the spot.
|
On August 17 2013 21:06 Clarity_nl wrote: This is dumb. I'm a townie. If I had posted a pm meant for snb in thread instead, I contact the hosts and go "fuck sorry should I edit it out?" hosts reply "yeah, and don't do it again" and I do.
Why is that different depending on alignment? Why is it less likely for scum to get modkilled? To me it makes sense for neither alignment to get modkilled.
Like, snb made the mistake and sent me a pm going "fuck", I told him "just edit it out and tell the hosts, I can vouch for the fact that it was a mistake pm and you're not being malicious", which I did tell the hosts, even though snb waited for hosts to tell him to edit it out.
Please comment on my rayn case DI. and then there was the not voting part.
|
or lying about his vote, which would make him scum too.
|
On August 17 2013 21:07 Dandel Ion wrote: imo we should lynch snb and shoot mocsta just to be save about the red check.
moc is not full hp either, so he should be in lord kp range.
I know this is true... but how do you know this?
|
because I've been told he's been shot at.
duh
|
On August 17 2013 21:09 Dandel Ion wrote: because I've been told he's been shot at.
duh
I'd pursue this more if I was lord T.T
Assume you cannot lynch snb, who do you lynch? Preferably rayn/mocsta/sharrant (in that order for me)
|
I'm not really willing to believe that Clarity is scum. If he is, he deserves a Mafia MVP of the year or something. If he could fake his PM interactions with me so well as scum, he'd have been WAY more helpful than any actual townie so far for me (maybe contending with iamperfection). I just can't believe it. If he is, I'm going to salute him in postgame as the best liar I have ever known. Town would also be pretty screwed with everything he (and scum with him) would know.
DI, what do you think of rayn's recent posting? Why are you proposing snb when we have a redcheck AND a good town player using weak and inconsistent logic? snb doesn't really make sense at all for today.
Let's see what we have here. The rayn I know is extremely focused on finding scum and pushing his opinions to the end of time. This game he has: 1) bluehunted 2) spammed 3) scumhunted with weak reasoning 4) stepped out of the heated discussion because he "didn't need to participate" several times now
I'm starting to think rayn might actually be a good lynch for today. Sharrant is dead anyway tomorrow if he's a blue and that would prove Mocsta town or scum.
|
On August 17 2013 21:07 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 21:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 17 2013 21:00 Clarity_nl wrote:On August 17 2013 20:58 raynpelikoneet wrote: ffs i was having an argument with Clarity, then he decided he wants to stop the argument when i am not done. With saying "i do not care and don't remember".
It's another thing if we are both town and just think differently, but if you think i am scum because i was trying to have an argument with someone and they start insulting me + fall back from the argument and because i think they are scum because of that you are being ridiculous-. No rayn, you said you thought I was scum to xata. If you somehow did not think I was scum before I answered your dumb question with the truth that I didn't really care, then how do you come to the conclusion that both me and onegu are scum because of a dumb assertion you made BECAUSE I GOT MAD AT YOU.Your thinking is full of holes. Scum making it up as they go along. Hang him. Fuck you. You are straight out lying! When you say someone is lying, it helps to point out what the lie is. This is the second time you've accused me of lying without doing the second part. You have logic that makes onegu scum I point out it makes me scum too You say I'm scum for being angry at you You did NOT say I am scum because your logic that makes onegu scum applies to me Ergo, making it up on the spot. The same logic only applies to you if you: 1) Tell me who you think were suspicious of you at D1 end 2) Are not bad and bluehunt 3) Have been pushing those people after that
What you said was: - SnB was not even suspicious of you - You "don't care to tell me who you thought was suspicious of you, and don't remember" (IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER IF THE PEOPLE WERE OR WERE NOT SUSPICIOUS OF YOU, IT MATTERS IF YYYYYYYOOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUU THINK SO OR NOT!"!"!"!!!"!!") - You insult me.
To me that seems like you are avoiding the issue i have with you, you are not willing to explain to me your thought process, there is something (if you tell the truth) i find out where you have fucked up.
Those are the reasons i thought you were mafia for. And that was AFTER the Onegu argument and for DIFFERENT reasons.
If you are unable to see that i don't know what to say.
|
On August 17 2013 21:16 Xatalos wrote: I'm not really willing to believe that Clarity is scum. If he is, he deserves a Mafia MVP of the year or something. If he could fake his PM interactions with me so well as scum, he'd have been WAY more helpful than any actual townie so far for me (maybe contending with iamperfection). I just can't believe it. If he is, I'm going to salute him in postgame as the best liar I have ever known. Town would also be pretty screwed with everything he (and scum with him) would know.
DI, what do you think of rayn's recent posting? Why are you proposing snb when we have a redcheck AND a good town player using weak and inconsistent logic? snb doesn't really make sense at all for today.
Let's see what we have here. The rayn I know is extremely focused on finding scum and pushing his opinions to the end of time. This game he has: 1) bluehunted 2) spammed 3) scumhunted with weak reasoning 4) stepped out of the heated discussion because he "didn't need to participate" several times now
I'm starting to think rayn might actually be a good lynch for today. Sharrant is dead anyway tomorrow if he's a blue and that would prove Mocsta town or scum. yeah dunno i could see both as town tbh, seeing as clarity is not reading the thread properly
if he pushed me more than softly i'd be getting pissed too atm, so i can't fault rayn for that.
|
On August 17 2013 21:18 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 21:07 Clarity_nl wrote:On August 17 2013 21:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 17 2013 21:00 Clarity_nl wrote:On August 17 2013 20:58 raynpelikoneet wrote: ffs i was having an argument with Clarity, then he decided he wants to stop the argument when i am not done. With saying "i do not care and don't remember".
It's another thing if we are both town and just think differently, but if you think i am scum because i was trying to have an argument with someone and they start insulting me + fall back from the argument and because i think they are scum because of that you are being ridiculous-. No rayn, you said you thought I was scum to xata. If you somehow did not think I was scum before I answered your dumb question with the truth that I didn't really care, then how do you come to the conclusion that both me and onegu are scum because of a dumb assertion you made BECAUSE I GOT MAD AT YOU.Your thinking is full of holes. Scum making it up as they go along. Hang him. Fuck you. You are straight out lying! When you say someone is lying, it helps to point out what the lie is. This is the second time you've accused me of lying without doing the second part. You have logic that makes onegu scum I point out it makes me scum too You say I'm scum for being angry at you You did NOT say I am scum because your logic that makes onegu scum applies to me Ergo, making it up on the spot. The same logic only applies to you if you: 1) Tell me who you think were suspicious of you at D1 end 2) Are not bad and bluehunt 3) Have been pushing those people after that What you said was: - SnB was not even suspicious of you - You "don't care to tell me who you thought was suspicious of you, and don't remember" (IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER IF THE PEOPLE WERE OR WERE NOT SUSPICIOUS OF YOU, IT MATTERS IF YYYYYYYOOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUU THINK SO OR NOT!"!"!"!!!"!!")- You insult me. To me that seems like you are avoiding the issue i have with you, you are not willing to explain to me your thought process, there is something (if you tell the truth) i find out where you have fucked up. Those are the reasons i thought you were mafia for. And that was AFTER the Onegu argument and for DIFFERENT reasons. If you are unable to see that i don't know what to say.
My thought process about what? What have I not explained my thought process about? Is this another "you haven't answered my questions" ???
I'm sure at some point I said people other then snb and ft who are town could have roleblocked me, does that not answer your question?
Who the fuck gets so offended over someone calling them a dork?
|
On August 17 2013 21:21 Dandel Ion wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 21:16 Xatalos wrote: I'm not really willing to believe that Clarity is scum. If he is, he deserves a Mafia MVP of the year or something. If he could fake his PM interactions with me so well as scum, he'd have been WAY more helpful than any actual townie so far for me (maybe contending with iamperfection). I just can't believe it. If he is, I'm going to salute him in postgame as the best liar I have ever known. Town would also be pretty screwed with everything he (and scum with him) would know.
DI, what do you think of rayn's recent posting? Why are you proposing snb when we have a redcheck AND a good town player using weak and inconsistent logic? snb doesn't really make sense at all for today.
Let's see what we have here. The rayn I know is extremely focused on finding scum and pushing his opinions to the end of time. This game he has: 1) bluehunted 2) spammed 3) scumhunted with weak reasoning 4) stepped out of the heated discussion because he "didn't need to participate" several times now
I'm starting to think rayn might actually be a good lynch for today. Sharrant is dead anyway tomorrow if he's a blue and that would prove Mocsta town or scum. yeah dunno i could see both as town tbh, seeing as clarity is not reading the thread properly if he pushed me more than softly i'd be getting pissed too atm, so i can't fault rayn for that.
Hmmmm. Do you have other reasoning for snb besides WIFOM? What do you think of Mocsta?
|
On August 17 2013 21:27 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 21:21 Dandel Ion wrote:On August 17 2013 21:16 Xatalos wrote: I'm not really willing to believe that Clarity is scum. If he is, he deserves a Mafia MVP of the year or something. If he could fake his PM interactions with me so well as scum, he'd have been WAY more helpful than any actual townie so far for me (maybe contending with iamperfection). I just can't believe it. If he is, I'm going to salute him in postgame as the best liar I have ever known. Town would also be pretty screwed with everything he (and scum with him) would know.
DI, what do you think of rayn's recent posting? Why are you proposing snb when we have a redcheck AND a good town player using weak and inconsistent logic? snb doesn't really make sense at all for today.
Let's see what we have here. The rayn I know is extremely focused on finding scum and pushing his opinions to the end of time. This game he has: 1) bluehunted 2) spammed 3) scumhunted with weak reasoning 4) stepped out of the heated discussion because he "didn't need to participate" several times now
I'm starting to think rayn might actually be a good lynch for today. Sharrant is dead anyway tomorrow if he's a blue and that would prove Mocsta town or scum. yeah dunno i could see both as town tbh, seeing as clarity is not reading the thread properly if he pushed me more than softly i'd be getting pissed too atm, so i can't fault rayn for that. Hmmmm. Do you have other reasoning for snb besides WIFOM? What do you think of Mocsta? yeah that snb only does shit when he's about to get lynched. and even that only after he defends himself for years.
mocsta honestly seems townie enough for me, but a red check is a red check. that's why i'd prefer shooting him over lynching him, if we have to.
|
On August 17 2013 21:22 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 21:18 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 17 2013 21:07 Clarity_nl wrote:On August 17 2013 21:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 17 2013 21:00 Clarity_nl wrote:On August 17 2013 20:58 raynpelikoneet wrote: ffs i was having an argument with Clarity, then he decided he wants to stop the argument when i am not done. With saying "i do not care and don't remember".
It's another thing if we are both town and just think differently, but if you think i am scum because i was trying to have an argument with someone and they start insulting me + fall back from the argument and because i think they are scum because of that you are being ridiculous-. No rayn, you said you thought I was scum to xata. If you somehow did not think I was scum before I answered your dumb question with the truth that I didn't really care, then how do you come to the conclusion that both me and onegu are scum because of a dumb assertion you made BECAUSE I GOT MAD AT YOU.Your thinking is full of holes. Scum making it up as they go along. Hang him. Fuck you. You are straight out lying! When you say someone is lying, it helps to point out what the lie is. This is the second time you've accused me of lying without doing the second part. You have logic that makes onegu scum I point out it makes me scum too You say I'm scum for being angry at you You did NOT say I am scum because your logic that makes onegu scum applies to me Ergo, making it up on the spot. The same logic only applies to you if you: 1) Tell me who you think were suspicious of you at D1 end 2) Are not bad and bluehunt 3) Have been pushing those people after that What you said was: - SnB was not even suspicious of you - You "don't care to tell me who you thought was suspicious of you, and don't remember" (IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER IF THE PEOPLE WERE OR WERE NOT SUSPICIOUS OF YOU, IT MATTERS IF YYYYYYYOOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUU THINK SO OR NOT!"!"!"!!!"!!")- You insult me. To me that seems like you are avoiding the issue i have with you, you are not willing to explain to me your thought process, there is something (if you tell the truth) i find out where you have fucked up. Those are the reasons i thought you were mafia for. And that was AFTER the Onegu argument and for DIFFERENT reasons. If you are unable to see that i don't know what to say. My thought process about what? What have I not explained my thought process about? Is this another "you haven't answered my questions" ??? I'm sure at some point I said people other then snb and ft who are town could have roleblocked me, does that not answer your question? Who the fuck gets so offended over someone calling them a dork? This is the last time i am trying to explain this. When i asked you "who do you think were suspicious of you on D1 end" you answered "i don't remember and i do not care to check". If you do not answer me in that question, i can't follow your thought process (where i apply my logic of people actually thinking about this game - figuring out who does what and why) about who do you think who could have roleblocked you in your mind. Then i am unable to use my logic on if you are scum or not based on if you have pushed those people's lynch after that.
Like here is what i would think if i was roleblocked and assumed a roleblocker blocked me: 1) Are they a jailor or a roleblocker (do they have a town/scum read on me)? 2) In case of no jailor (as it seems likely now), is it town or mafia roleblocker? 3) In case i come to conclusion (as you have come?) town roleblocker; 4) Who had a scumread on me? (let's apply the logic i used on Onegu here and say SnB is the only one) 5) SnB 6) Conclusion; SnB is likely a town roleblocker. ... 7) Now, as i have a reason to assume SnB is a town roleblocker, i have something to work with. I need to find more about him to confirm him in a way or another in case (1) he really is the town rb'r, so i can defend him for not being possibly mislynched, or (2) i am wrong in something, who else fit's in the profile so i can go back to 1 with them.
Do you understand my logic?
|
On August 17 2013 21:18 raynpelikoneet wrote: Those are the reasons i thought you were mafia for. And that was AFTER the Onegu argument and for DIFFERENT reasons.
If you are unable to see that i don't know what to say.
Timestamps
On August 17 2013 18:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 18:36 Onegu wrote:On August 17 2013 18:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 17 2013 18:26 Onegu wrote:On August 10 2013 13:50 FirmTofu wrote: Town Clarity is someone who has a very confident Day 1. He pressures people, attacks with authority, and backs off only when he is confident that the player he is attacking is not scum. Clarity displayed NONE of that during day 1. Clarity played rather passive and although he was relatively active, his accusations were a lot less characteristic of his town play. Well FT posted this right before his mislynch after his flip maybe people looked at that, SnB still had a scum read on him iirc. If you really want me to Ill look more but I dont think looking for town RB is something that needs to be done right now as again it isnt relevant. On August 16 2013 00:40 Onegu wrote: Guess since Im the person who first pushed for a SnB lynch with the lords I should vote him
##VOTE:StrongAndBig Firmtofu is dead. SnB had a scumread on Clarity. You think there is a town roleblocker who blocked Clarity on N1, and you on N2. Now, why did you vote for the guy who was most likely to be the town roleblocker in your mind on D3? I know why. Because scum! Wow are you serious? You asked me who had scum reads on clarity, I never once said I think one of those two are town RB, there is no reason for me to try to find town RB, I was just point out a few people had scum reads on clarity so it is likely others had a scum read on him also. Can anyone see why this post makes zero sense?
This is where rayn thinks onegu is scum because of his logical fallacy
On August 17 2013 19:44 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 19:34 raynpelikoneet wrote: I am not accusing you of anything, i am trying to understand your thought process because i do not know your alignment.
I do not think there is a jailor because of Vivax flipping scum RB and Grackaroni being jailed on N3. So it's either town or mafia roleblocker. Town roleblocker makes sense if mafia roleblocked Sharrant on N2. Either way, no sane town roleblocker would block Sharrant, that makes Sharrant town. This means either scum roleblocked Onegu, or they withheld the roleblock to make him look more town (this also makes sense because he claimed blue on D2 - actually it makes sense in both Onegu = scum/town).
Did you think anyone else was suspicious of you at D1 end other than SnB? I don't remember nor do I care to look back to see who was suspicious of me. I'm glad you did an EBWOP to make sure I answered this important question. I'm gonna take a break now.
This is where rayn thinks I'm scum for being angry at him
On August 17 2013 19:28 Clarity_nl wrote:I see no reason for me to get jailed n1 so I think I was roleblocked. Here let me make a case on myself: Show nested quote +On August 13 2013 05:57 Clarity_nl wrote: Doesn't really matter. Highly unlikely town would roleblock you, so the roleblock came from scum or scum withheld a roleblock to give you town cred which you already had.
So you're town. Don't really care about the rest. Stop measuring dicks please.
CLARITY CLEARLY THINKS THAT XATA WAS ROLEBLOCKED BY SCUM, THAT MEANS HE BELIEVES HE GOT ROLEBLOCKED BY TOWN THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO EXPRESSED A SCUMREAD ON CLARITY AND WOULD THEREFORE ROLEBLOCK HIM AS TOWN ARE FT AND SNB FT DIED SO CLARITY MUST ASSUME THAT SNB IS TOWN ROLEBLOCKER Show nested quote +On August 15 2013 04:19 Clarity_nl wrote:snb asked me in a pm why I think he's scum, and asked me to answer either in pm or thread, he doesn't seem happy with the "he's not doing anything" reason. So here it is, why snb is scum: 1) Low activity. It CAN be town, but it's more likely to be disinterested scum. 2) After being lord d1 snb suddenly does not want to be lord d2. He tells both me and oats the exact same phrase in pms "I want to run for lord n3 again, I want to re-earn my obv-towniness from n0" 3) Broken promises. This ties into point 2. He has not re-earned his "obv-towniness" at all. d2 he didn't do much, that's simply how it is. He had no presence in the thread at all, nor im pms. How about d3 you ask? He's pushed risen real hard you say? Let's look at his main post on risen shall we. + Show Spoiler +On August 13 2013 01:45 strongandbig wrote:So here's what I want to talk about - why has Risen been getting a pass today? I don't even care about him being lord. It sounds completely reasonable that he would be chosen since his house was worried Rayne would die (although it seems like a better plan would have been for three to vote Rayne and Risen to vote himself, that way if Ryan dies Risen would be the next lord automatically). Anyway, we should be pressuring Risen for what's in his filter. (1) The big entry post - I talked some about this before, but it's total bullshit. He attacked Oats, Yamato, and DI for playing anti-town, shitting up the thread, fighting over nothing, etc. The problem is, this is exactly what they do EVERY GAME. Oats argues over stupid things, Yamato is touchy as fuck, and DI is the most anti-town town player possible. They are the very definition of easy targets for scum to attack exactly like Risen did - but Risen should have known better than to call them scum and push for their lynch off of it. (aside: Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 03:27 Risen wrote:Oats is scum, Yamato is null The funny thing is that prior to looking into the filters I thought Yamato would come across as more scummy than Oats, and gave kush a pass while reading through because of that. Connection theory! Reads like scum not wanting to either attack their buddy or directly defending them. Although Yamato is super touchy, it is more out of character for him to take a fight so far in the fucking-the-thread direction than it is for Oats to do so, and Risen doesn't actually give any reasons why he thinks Yamato is a better scum target than Oats, he just asserts that his filter looks better.) In that post, he also calls Xatalos scum based on what boils down in part to a connection theory with his bullshit read on DI. Connection theories with unflipped (or un-scumclaimed) players? Okay, can be done by town, but shouldn't, another easy way for scum to generate reads. Another thing - just look at that post in general. It's huge, so he must be town right? (just ask austinmcc!) Nope, wrong! A large part of the post is stream-of-consciousness, much easier to write than an actual structured case. Also it's a list-post, shorter reads on large numbers of people, easy for scum to do and looks big. Most of the reads in the post are "easy reads" for scum to make, attacking people for playing in an anti-town fashion rather than for actually being scum and attacking other people for invented reasons. A lot of sound and fury, signifying nothing. The rest of his posting shows much less effort put into analyzing the game. An example is how Clarity is still his preferred lynch target in his final posts before N1, despite a lot more information being put into the thread and a lot more public discussion among the principals of that situation. He hasn't made any real cases since his first post, and he hasn't actually followed up on his DI, xatalos, or grackaroni reads. From the clear and huge difference in effort between his first post and the rest of his filter, it's clear that his first post was very much constructed and careful, which imo is a scum thing to do; additionally, the fact that he was careful and put effort into just writing that post makes it even more suspect that his reads in it were so obviously bad in such a specifically scummy way. So yeah, what I want to hear next is from people who've been in PMs with Risen, whether he's given more to them in terms of reads, cases, and indications that he's actually thinking carefully about the game than he has been in the thread. First off, the first paragraph about risen getting lord is immediately wrong. during n2, Only rayn and risen were alive when they had to vote for lord, yet snb doesn't know this? He's mentioning 3 vote for one and one the other. He thought all 4 members of that house were alive? This indicates snb is clearly not paying attention to this game. The first three paragraphs are all on his opening list post that EVERYONE AND THEIR MOTHER agreed was terrible. Why are you analyzing it snb? To make your case four times as big as it needed to be, perhaps? Big cases carry more weight, right? Then there's the last bit: The rest of his posting shows much less effort put into analyzing the game. An example is how Clarity is still his preferred lynch target in his final posts before N1, despite a lot more information being put into the thread and a lot more public discussion among the principals of that situation. He hasn't made any real cases since his first post, and he hasn't actually followed up on his DI, xatalos, or grackaroni reads. From the clear and huge difference in effort between his first post and the rest of his filter, it's clear that his first post was very much constructed and careful, which imo is a scum thing to do; additionally, the fact that he was careful and put effort into just writing that post makes it even more suspect that his reads in it were so obviously bad in such a specifically scummy way. Notice how snb's case on risen is comprised entirely of Risen's day 1 and nothing else. Yes, at the end of day 1 he still wanted to lynch me. But guess what? He eventually did change his mind on me and grack. I doubt snb was even aware of it, but if he was then clearly he didn't care to mention it, because it would make his case less compelling. AND 4) snb only shows up in thread when he's under pressure. When he's not under pressure he's nowhere to be found. ##Vote strongandbig WHATS THIS, CLARITY IS VOTING FOR THE ONLY PERSON HE COULD CONSIDER TO BE THE TOWN ROLEBLOCKER? THIS IS NOT TOWNIE LOGIC, CLARITY IS SCUM ______________________________________________________________ That is what you sound like. And calling you a dork should not be insulting. It's like the mildest insult I could think of.
THIS IS THE POST WHERE I SAY IF HE THINKS ONEGU IS SCUM HE MUST THINK I AM SCUM, NOTICE HOW THEY ARE INBETWEEN THE TWO POSTS
This means the chronological order is:
18:37 rayn calls onegu scum for dumb reasons Clarity explains why they are dumb reasons rayn explains his reasons arent dumb 19:28 Clarity explains that with his reasoning he should consider Clarity scum This is where rayn should have a scumread on me 19:44 rayn thinks clarity is scum now because he got angry at him (he confirms this with his xata interaction)
Let's look at the first post I quoted again
On August 17 2013 21:18 raynpelikoneet wrote: Those are the reasons i thought you were mafia for. And that was AFTER the Onegu argument and for DIFFERENT reasons.
If you are unable to see that i don't know what to say.
Rayn says that he got a scumread on me after the onegu argument, but the onegu argument was before I got angry at him.
Get dunked.
|
It is as important to find townies than it is to find mafia. Every townie you find is -1 mislynch opportunity to mafia. When those options run out mafia is screwed.
That's why i can't understand why people do not think this kind of stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|