Catch 22 Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 18 2013 04:54 yamato77 wrote: Well, I'm in the high-priority group of experienced solo-game mafioso, so I don't have much to worry about. I laughed. Not because I think you're wrong, but for the fact you said it. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Looks nice for now. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Namely asking yamato why he's worried about DP (yamato, how would you 'expect' town DP to look if you're not seeing it here?) and pulling GK up on his characterisation of Oatsmaster's play. Also agrees with yamato's correct observation about Shaio's play. I probably have opinions on other players too, but I don't care to talk about them right now, unless someone has specific questions. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 21 2013 18:30 raynpelikoneet wrote: marv, thoughts on yamato, hapa and DP. go! Light town-reads on all of them. yamato is being pulled up for saying things like "i have townreads on almost everyone" when this kind of thing just seems completely in-line with his rather over-confident play as town ("look! i solved the game this fast guys!") rather than sitting back as mafia. Hapa just discussed. DP has been super involved while he's here. Don't really know how to read the contents of his posts so well yet, but his high activity and give-a-shit ratio is promising. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 21 2013 18:37 raynpelikoneet wrote: Do you buy yamato's explanation on his "reads"? I think so. As I was reading it I thought it looked pretty terrible, but actually his "I'm worried about these 2 because I have townreads on everyone else" isn't an unexpected thing for a town yamato imo. Certainly more unexpected for a mafia-yamato I'd say. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 21 2013 18:41 Oatsmaster wrote: marv, how do you get the conclusion that yamato is over-confident from him saying he has no clue who is SCUM and only who is town? Also why is shiao pi scum? Because yamato is handing out townreads like candy, as if he can read that many people that quickly. Shiao is mafia for that horrible, lazy comment on yamato, with no followup. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 21 2013 18:45 raynpelikoneet wrote: So the correct way to play scum apparently is to say "everyone is town" and when you are asked about it they are "all null besides that one guy"? Is this really what you are saying marv? Do you think yamato is that bad as town and absolutely wouldn't do that as scum? It's kind of an easy way to say "there is nothing to comment on now, i wanna be friends with you all". In what world do mafia make such an obvious consistency within such a short span of time? Certainly not one I play in, do you? I don't think yamato is bad as town, I think he just says things too confidently and then has to pay for them somehow. It says something, I reckon, that yamato is one of the players I believe to be over-confident (and that's coming from me). Like I said, I think he's more likely to do it as town, and more likely to be careful as mafia. Oats, I'd like yamato to explain how he'd usually expect to view DP, which is why I already asked that question here. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 21 2013 18:48 Oatsmaster wrote: No its absolutely bullshit and wrong. Yamato calling everyone town is solving the game? No. I'm done talking with you for now. This will get me or anyone else nowhere at all. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 21 2013 18:55 raynpelikoneet wrote: marv, the bottom line here is that they were not town-reads in the first place. They were null-reads besides OO. I know yamato is over-confident as town, why can't he mask that play as scum? I understand it might not be the case here but i'm worried about people taking his words at face-value (in case he is actually town). I want him to explain himself, why would you call someone town who you think is actually null? I want people to explain why they are taking yamato's bullshit reads at face value when he "corrects" them. Do you, marv, take everything at face value when someone just says they "made a mistake"? Or is it only yamato? I don't understand your angle here. I've explained why I thought it was more likely from a town-yamato than a mafia-yamato. I called yamato a light townread, not certain town. He could be mafia, so in answer to your question, yes he could try to mimic his town play as mafia like that, I just find it the less likely of the two options. Nor is what I've said giving yamato a free-pass into not explaining himself (further?). | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 21 2013 19:10 raynpelikoneet wrote: What Oats just said. Marv, can you back up this meta-read on yamato somehow? I'll give you a hint, look at LXI & Red and you'll find out what's different in town!yamato's arrogance compared to scum!yamato. I'll give you another hint, you can't. yamato is scum. Sorry broski, just not feeling it right now. Pursue it all you like and we'll see what happens, it's early. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 21 2013 19:18 DarthPunk wrote: I actually thought about this while i was watching TV and the comment marv made about handing out town reads like candy. That is actually something scum often do because they find it difficult to form scum reads. So it sort of lends credence to the idea that if his process has changed it has become scummier. Also marvs town read on him is based on yamato's personality from what i can tell. Yes, I've played practically every game yamato has played, or if not I've obsed those games. It's just how I view his plays. As for the townreads, as a general point it's correct, but in this case he's not pretending to make effort by going "x is town because of y", he's making a blanket statement. For a similar example, see Hero Mini Mafia: On December 10 2012 16:08 wherebugsgo wrote: Name someone you find scummy this game. Can't? Okay. Process of elimination. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 21 2013 19:23 Oatsmaster wrote: Thats wbg not yamato. Also that was like ~5 into the game maybe? It's irrelevant who it was, I was pointing out that it's a thought process I've seen townies use before. Do you see mafia say "I think the whole town is fine, except x and y"? If so, when? Because I can't think of anything. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 21 2013 19:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: Why can't you marv understand that this is not what yamato is saying. He is sayiong "the whole town is fine besides X and Y" and when asked about it he is saying "actually the whole town is null, including X and Y, besides Z". I think that's very different what you just said here. I do understand, I just don't attach the importance that you do to it. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 21 2013 19:55 raynpelikoneet wrote: marv: I don't get it. ShiaoPi is scum for calling yamato scum, which you describe as "horribly lazy comment". yamato is town for calling people town and worrysome when they in fact were null for him. How is that not a "horribly lazy comment" in the first place? Does ShiaoPi do that as scum but not as town? Can you back that up somehow? There is something that worries me in ShiaoPi's comment about yamato, but i'm not going to reveal it yet. Can anyone see what that is? ShiaoPi; elaborate your read on yamato please. Anyone else you find scummy here at the moment? Here's the thing, rayn. Everyone in mafia is not equal and different things are scummy for different players. Applying what yamato did to what Shiao did is a false equivalent, and I've explained how and why I view what yamato did. Further, as a reminder: On June 21 2013 18:48 marvellosity wrote: In what world do mafia make such an obvious [in]consistency within such a short span of time? Certainly not one I play in, do you? As for Shiao, I'm not going to be drawing meta comparisons to justify looking into one bad comment. The simple fact is that he a) posted something for the sake of posting b) was too lazy to check on what he was asking himself c) implied yamato was 'scummy as shit' without every even attempting to explain why he thought that, and disappearing. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
His policy/tunnel on me is meaningless, and he's actually posting. Even as a last resort I'm not sure how I could be convinced that he was a better option than another lurker I don't like the look of. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 21 2013 21:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: The thing with Coag is that i want him to give opinions on someone else than you. It doesn't even matter what alignment you are, this joke thingy with lynching you is bad as shit. Why not actually hunt scum besides calling you scum before you have not even posted? Do you know how to read OO marv? What do you think of him at the moment? Also you didn't answer Oats' question about Ange. What do you think of her? This was my answer on Ange: On June 21 2013 19:18 marvellosity wrote: Nothing at all yet. I've read OO correctly in the past - as town in Red Team, as mafia in Hydra 1. The counterpoint to this is I most recently read him incorrectly in a game on omgus (not helped by the fact he disappeared for the last 24 hours of day 1) and also he put in a pretty nice performance as replacement scum in Smurf Mafia. In short I no longer feel that confident in "meta"ing him, beyond involvedness/give-a-shitness. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 21 2013 21:49 Oatsmaster wrote: marv, how strong a read is shiao pi for you and do you think anyone else is scum? Fairly weak given it's based on one or two posts + disappearance. No-one else has said/done enough for me to think they're scummy right now. Like, I could say that I'm waiting to see where goodkarma goes after his case/posts on you, but realistically that's just me waiting to see what he does next. Or that slOosh dropped one post and then disappeared. There's not that much to say about it. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 21 2013 22:23 raynpelikoneet wrote: I actually do think GK's read on Oats is pretty shitty. Yes, it's really not the best. I went back and checked given you were kind enough to bring it up. On June 21 2013 15:54 goodkarma wrote: It was the first few hours I was in the game, so as far as I'm concerned it was day one. And it was based off my first post, so he literally is capable of megatunneling off basically nothing... But that's not really my main issue with him. I'm still having trouble understanding how he can so easily forget about you and DP when jumping onto Yamato. Also have you learned your lesson from Axel and Shao last game? Activity =/= towniness. Oats is always pretty active, so that's not particularly indicative of anything. The bolded part in particular made me go back and check what was going on. Oats threw out a couple of random scumreads on DP and Hapa, and then moved on to yamato with On June 21 2013 14:38 Oatsmaster wrote: In other news, yamato is looking awfully scummy for not being able to back up his read which is an actual reason. What I don't understand is why goodkarma would think that Oats would be particularly attached to scumreads that he hasn't developed and just threw out there. Is the thought process "these guys give me scummy feels -> this different guy is scum because he can't back up his reads" really so difficult to understand from a townie perspective? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 21 2013 23:08 ShiaoPi wrote: Because that is what yamato does (at least in my memory)? Yes, it does not help anyone to determine his alignment right now, but what did you expect, words of wisdom in every post I do on day 1? It's just something to keep in mind. I am thinking you are blowing this way out of proportion When have you played with yamato that has given you this impression? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 00:10 ShiaoPi wrote: Cannot pin point it to a certain game right now, would have to look in his game history again, but it is more I always feel like wanting to shoot him for some posts he does. take it as you want, I am really dont feel like like searching for specifics right now. Ok, but basically as far as I can tell you said bullshit with no basis. I like to think my mafia memory is pretty decent even in games I've not played in, and I can't really remember you two playing together much, if at all. So where I'm at is that you said some bullshit to passively-aggressively say that yamato was 'looking' scummy, without even actually saying he was scummy. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
- i think hapa looks townish, for reasons given - i think DP looks townish, for reason given - i find Ange null - i want to know what yamato expects from a town DP - i find goodkarma's failure to understand Oats' thought process baffling - i find shiaopi's comment on yamato scummy, which is explained - i've commented on how i view coag's play so far I've only been in the thread today with minimal other people posting, and he's worried I'm only talking about yamato, despite the fact that the sole reaosn I did so was to answer other people's questions? Severe case of bad reading comprehension right here. ShiaoPi - so we have LXI where you were mafia, where presumably you knew his posts weren't scummy because you were scum, and British Empire, a game you replaced out. Seems like nothing to assert "yamato is pro at looking scummy as shit" don't you think? Could you tell me what you were hoping to achieve with whatever answers you were given to the question? Like I'm pretty wary over turning this into a tunnel over something relatively small, but if you're town you need to help clear this up for me. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 00:34 cDgCorazon wrote: Replace "will" with "usually" and maybe you'll understand. I was just talking about Yamato's meta. I'm not sure where you guys are going with this. If I was Yamato's scummate, I would have told him how to look townie in the QT and not in the thread. So your point is moot. Have some cake! ![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 00:42 ShiaoPi wrote: @marv: I was deciding whether to put him into scum camp or null because of his playstyle. Look at oats for example, he is somebody whose play regardless of alignment is at first glance pretty similar, so if a player like oats does something scummy I accept it as part of his usual behaviour of inconsistency etc. and do not focus too much of it until I see a clearer scumtell from my point of view. With yamato I had left over feeling that he was scummy either way, coupled with his posts which are scummy if you look at them isolated without prior knowledge of his play. I thought: hmm maybe he is more a oats kind of player who inevitably will look scummy at some point. Next thing is I ask my question to the thread to confirm my leftover feelings, hapa does not really tell me, corazon talks about a game I have not obsed/read, dp also has trouble differentiating between bad and scum on yamato. I know DP and hapa to be good players, dont know corazon so I arbitrarily decide to ignore corazon. See my feelings kinda confirmed and put yamato as null Personally I feel like yamato is pretty good at demonstrating his towniness, even if not *always* in productive ways (but usually). In my eyes he's been inexplicably lynched by towns a couple of times when he was town. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt for now as you're earnestly explaining yourself. I'm just going to attribute it to laziness (for now) ![]() ##Unvote | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 01:01 goodkarma wrote: For one thing, he endlessly clung onto a scum target and spammed "kill him" much further explanation for half the game. He seemed just overall to be much more in your face with his reads than he is here. He feels a bit more distanced and level-headed here. People say he's being dickish and arrogant, but this game he's been far more tame than last game. Can you explain how the change is scum-motivated? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 01:12 goodkarma wrote: Well when I was ingame is what I'm the most familiar with, and what is fresh in my mind. I believe he was also especially dickish about his BH and Hapa reads last game day one. The point is here he's actually almost polite with his reads (again, compared to last game). The main issue with this is, GK, that your first couple of posts arising suspicion on Oats are primarily based on meta, or how you view his play last time he was town. The problem is, if you have selective/incomplete memory or you don't check, then it's at best not very useful at all, and at worst manipulative/deceitful. See what I'm saying? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 01:25 goodkarma wrote: This is obvious. I don't feel I've been misleading. He has been more level-headed this game... A couple of things. Firstly I think pretty much everyone else in the game isn't detecting any particular major deviation in Oats' play from normal. That's fine maybe, maybe you got something subtle that the rest of us didn't. The problem arises when you bring Oats up as a suspect / scumread because of your meta-read (which Shiao pointed out didn't quite hold true during the D1 you were referring to). It's precisely why I asked how you felt the change was scum-motivated. If you're bringing up a scum suspect on the basis of meta, you need to explain why the differences you bring up make him scum and not playing a slightly different style. In short: a) maybe he has been more level-headed (?) but it's early and it's not something I (and others are picking up) b) even if he is, why does that make him scum | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 01:36 goodkarma wrote: For the last time: His play felt different, and I was working to make sense of why. He is not currently a scumread for me. Have you made sense of why? And the fact he's not *currently* a scumread doesn't change the fact you brought him up as the person you were "most suspicious of". Why do you feel better about him now? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 01:54 goodkarma wrote: No I can't quite figure out why Oats is playing civilly. Honestly, my time is probably better spent not thinking about it anymore for the time being... Regarding question two: As I've said, that he actually has rationale for his reads that I could find sensibly coming from a town perspective... The complete switch of attention thing still doesn't sit well with me. Others here seem to have some kind of "well it's Oats" rationale for when he does some things, but I wanted to take a quick look at this as there could be scum motivation behind it. Said quick look apparently means my entire filter... Ha! By the power vested in me by absolutely nobody, I release thee to look at other things. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 03:52 yamato77 wrote: And wouldn't you think that this kind of "architecture" is exactly the kind of tell that gives away scum? Note that his terrible initial posting came under fire both games, indicating that he generally has a hard time making opening posts as mafia. As a tried and true tactic for getting out of it, he explains away his posts and chooses to divert attention to someone else he can quickly come up with a case on. The best predictor of future behavior is past behavior. If he's pulled this exact maneuver as scum before, why wouldn't he do it again? No, I think it's precisely stuff like 'architecture' that's how meta is totally misapplied. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 03:55 yamato77 wrote: So you don't think that I'm at all accurate in my analysis of what has gone on in this game and that game? The problem is, yamato, "diverting attention" also translates to "talking about something else and potentially scumhunting". Say he's town for a moment, and made a dumb opening post. How should he proceed? Probably by looking for suspicious stuff and commenting on it, right? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 07:07 slOosh wrote: Well this is an awkward timing to come back >.> Someone ask me a really hard question, I need to gain some feel into the game. You can have 2, can't make promises about their difficulty. 1) What do you make of coag's unrelenting campaign to get me lynched? 2) What do you make of Corazon deciding Oats is definitely scum ("it's clear to me") and then disappearing to pop up with a cajoling post for Ange, and not pushing that read on the rest of the thread? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 07:14 Coagulation wrote: marv u think im scum ? No idea, dear. Normally doing something like that is pretty scummy (see Dandel in my last game, Les Mafia), but you're coag so you may just be doing it for funsies. *shrug* | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 07:16 cDgCorazon wrote: Yes, because repeating the same point to everyone else just because you're not reading is bad. The information is all there. I gave my opinion on Ange, don't get butthurt because I wasn't talking to you directly when I said it. Marv if you're going to start this shit again please read any game that I've ever played with you. You've been dead wrong about me so many times I'm surprised you're silly enough to throw yourself at the wall again. This is extremely bad, so stop it. The fact that I've been wrong about you in the past does not mean I will always be wrong about you, nor does it mean I should never pursue you in games, and suggesting as much is just absurd. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
For someone who harps on about town atmosphere, you are by far the most negative influence on town atmosphere in this game so far. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
3) Do yamato and hapa's interactions today look natural, like two townies interacting? Or how do you view it? Ange - I dunno. Choosing between lurky players at this stage. I would probably say Obvious: On June 21 2013 14:37 ObviousOne wrote: Haven't finished my first post of coffee. How am I supposed to be better at figuring out DP as town or scum when his scum play is being lauded in the thread as TL Mafia's gift to scum teams? Hapa looks like he may be experimenting with something early game or he's just reaction fishing in which case he's gotten a reaction out of you. They're drawing attention to themselves, that's all I need to know right now a few hours into the game. I'll tell you exactly what I'm thinking about right now because it's win/win to share it, either mafia will continue to do these things or they will post more in the thread by which we can find the inconsistencies. Mafia has very little reason to actively engage in discussion right now, especially if people are all pointing fingers at each other in the event that everyone posting right now is town. They would probably be content to let town tear itself apart and may not even post. People who are not posting by the end of 24 hours (and I don't mean a handful of one-liners and jokes) climb to the top of my kill-with-fire list. If all of town is talking, this list shortens greatly, and corners the scum into this category. Consider early participation to be town points for day 1. This will also effectively take out the town-aligned anti-town elements in the same vein, if townies aren't sharing their thoughts then they are playing for scum and I'd lynch them just the same to make solving the game easier down the line. (link)Did you read my post in Smurf Mini? Basically the whole of the bolded, he's stressing the importance of activity, and especially early activity, and yet we've had remarkably little from him. I would expect a town Obvious to be more involved than he has been so far, especially since he's talked about the importance of such involvement. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 07:37 Ange777 wrote: @marv: Wouldn't a scum Obvious be more conscious about promoting activity and failing it himself as a scum player? This would be logical yes, but I don't rely on mafia to carry through on their promises. Also, as far as I remember no-one else has pulled him up on this until I have so far - maybe he hopes it just looks nice at the time, at a time when he *is* actually making a couple of posts. In Smurf Obvious posted nicely as mafia but as little as possible, whereas when Obvious is town he actively tries to solve the game. I think I've talked myself into voting him, he's my best lead for now ^^ ##Vote: Obvious | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 07:39 slOosh wrote: I'll try to answer it, but could you first clarify either a string of posts / pages for me to refer to, or perhaps the dialogue that you found strange / scummy / (? I'm not sure). I don't really look at interactions unless we get some flips that point me that way. Bottom of page 24 through page 26. And don't tell me what you usually do when you specifically asked for tricky questions to get your mind in the game, dearest :p I wasn't making a judgement on their exchange, was just looking to see how you felt about it and why. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 07:38 cDgCorazon wrote: As for Marv, I'd say he's scum but stupidity isn't a scum trait. If I ever roll day vig in a future game I will shoot Marv at the beginning of the game. I don't think I've ever played a game with him where he contributes to a good town atmosphere. Again, you are the most negative influence on town atmosphere in this game, you've constantly snarked at people with your totally unfounded arrogance. Further you played with me in Duel where I was shot N0 because I led town to an extraordinarily productive first 24 hours. Take your disgusting rhetoric elsewhere. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 07:50 Ange777 wrote: @marv: I just feel like I would be more careful about making any promises as scum because people will remember them and hold me to account for them and the least I would want is stand out badly. Right now I'd put Obvious in the same categorie as the other lurkers. @Sloosh: What part of Obvious' entry made you suspicious? It's one way you catch scum. For example, Liar Game last year. A game full of TL's finest players, won handily by EchelonTee as mafia. In the post-game, it was pointed out that EchelonTee promised to come down on sandroba if he lurked; sandroba proceeded to lurk, but Echelon never came down on him. People either didn't notice this or didn't pick up on its importance. I think the point I'm trying to make is that it wasn't a *promise*, it was a statement of what a good townie looks like, importantly made at a time when he was actually making a few posts. He's posting, it looks good, sounds nice. There's not necessarily forethought at that point in time. And we both know how deliberate a player you are anyway, darling. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 07:52 slOosh wrote: Apologies ^.^ What I took out of it was that yamato backed off, so he must have some degree of town read + respect for you (marv) and Hapa. He (yamato) said he will put him (ShiaoPi) on his watch list, which is great because it means more stuff from ShiaoPi and yamato held to higher degree of contribution. Nothing worrisome yet for me. Alright. Wasn't worrisome for me either, so that's good. I like this ObviousOne direction. Let's hammer out some more discussion / focus on him. Here's what caught my eye He asks Coag (of all people), about his thoughts on Oats (a town read). If he wanted thoughts on Oats, there were people already talking about it. If he wanted thoughts from Coag, I think there could have been better questions. Do you think this is strange / different / scummy? It's a tricky one. See instinctively I'd say that trying to engage coag on about anything isn't a terrible idea, and it actually got a response out of coag. It seems early enough on the game that there wasn't that much going on by then to ask him about. I don't think I read that much into that one. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 07:59 Ange777 wrote: Fair enough, I'll keep that in mind. I don't know how I am supposed to take your last sentence though ... As a compliment or as a warning? ![]() It's late, I am off to bed now. Haha. Neither in particular, was more pointing out that you have a way of thinking about things that would lead you to think that others are similarly careful and deliberate as you (with regards to Obvious posting about activity). | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 13:56 cDgCorazon wrote: The problem is that Marv tunnels me in every single game we play together. How is that helpful ever? I didn't tunnel you in Duel, nor did I tunnel you in this game, I asked one other player about one thing you did this game. Grow up. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 18:01 Hapahauli wrote: Both him and Rayn actually. Rayn's play just feels off. He's literally suspicious of every person in this game. And not in a "paranoid, spazzy townie" way. It feels very controlled and deliberate, which is just strange and scummy. I'll write something up when it's not 5am >> Hapa, I'd very much like to hear your case or whatever it is on rayn, because he's someone I've felt quite good about. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
I agree with GK - we need to see what you have. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
![]() As for the ShiaoPi post, I don't find it very good, it actually worries me more than earlier on, when I thought ShiaoPi might be town because his interactions seemed sincere/honest with his explanations of his really dodgy opening post. For anyone who played/watched Dr Who with me, it felt similar to my interactions with Sharrant when I was suspicious of him, although I'm far less sure on my outcome with ShiaoPi. The remaining problem I have with Shiao is that he and GK seem to have gotten into this ding-dong which only affects them, or, at least, everyone else is largely ignoring. Aside from that I'm still not getting the yamato scumvibe thing and Hapa can answer for himself. I think some of the points you make are valid, but don't necessarily make him scum - but yeah, that one's Hapa's ball to field. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 23:00 raynpelikoneet wrote: marv, talk to me. what's your read on Cora? Seems town, because he's mimicking his total prickishness towards me in all games to a tee. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 22 2013 23:15 raynpelikoneet wrote: I kinda wanted to ask that because if you thought he is town for same reasons i did. You didn't. :/ Who do you think is scum, let's talk about them. I rarely think the same as you, and I'm sure we're both pretty happy about that ^^ My scumreads are limited to the lurkers, I've already said what has to be said about Obvious and Ange (which isn't a great deal), and I could probably lynch either at this stage, although I prefer Obvious. Ange is an asset so hopefully she shows that today :x Shiao says that goodkarma feels the same as he did in their scumgame, but to me gk feels the same as in Les Mis. He's been more around and active than he was in the scumgame, pushing his ideas some even if I don't really agree with them so much. GK has also had flashes of irritation which were present in Les Mis. Sylencia is just absent, slOosh who knows. He sounds ok but that's about it | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
We appear to have different thoughts on his meta and how it applies; simply enough I think with reasonable conviction that my read on it is right and yours is not. I was going to take a couple of his posts and highlight stuff within them that sounds like "town" yamato, but the whole tone just sounds like him. + Show Spoiler + On June 22 2013 16:14 yamato77 wrote: I have little no interest in further explaining the posts that I have already made. Read them yourselves if you fail to understand what I've said. That being the case, it's ridiculously disturbing that Hapa comes in with a pseudo-case on me after Oats and DP both agree that I'm somehow still scummy. None of this was said while I was talking to Hapa earlier, nor has he seemed particularly enthusiastic about lynching me in the first place. Hapa as scum would be afraid to attack me openly and directly, especially without support, but Hapa as town would be fearless and bullheaded in his suspicion of me, if it actually existed. The way Hapa has played this so far, I'm reasonably convinced that he is mafia. His noncommittal stance on me and his weak reads elsewhere are not what I would expect from town Hapa. This Hapa seems much more content with blending in than actually leading discussion, a trait that I associate directly with scum Hapa. Looks like I should have gone with my gut from his first post. ##Vote Hapahauli On June 22 2013 17:10 yamato77 wrote: My opinion of OO has changed. Upon re-examination, and due to his lack of contribution in over 24 hours, I now consider him a decent candidate for lynch. Sloosh posted meaningful things, I'm willing to let him slide by. Sylencia is apparently replacing out, which is a scum tell lately. Everyone else besides yourself, DP, Ange, and Shaio seem relatively town enough for me to write them off FOR TODAY. There are, indeed, other parts of Shaio's play I don't like, but they aren't convincing enough to make me want to lynch him. He was lynchbait in my first scumgame while he was alive, and you guys did end up lynching his replacement largely as a result of this. Perhaps my phrasing has been poor this game, but being clear with how I feel about a particular player's posting when things are not as black and white as I'd like them to be is difficult. I think it's fairly obvious that I'm not particularly confident in any read. On June 22 2013 17:13 yamato77 wrote: My problem with you is that you seem afraid to call me mafia, like you're scared that I'll insta-tunnel you for it and get you lynched. This doesn't feel like the organic line of questioning I usually receive from town Hapa at all. Just like, the cockiness of saying "i've explained in my posts already, go read them", the hyperbole he utilises "it's ridiculously disturbing", and where he sounds like he's passing judgement from a position of authority "Sloosh posted meaningful things, I'm willing to let him slide by". I could go on, but I'm not really sure it would convince you if I did. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
I don't really care why you think Cora is town. Why should I? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
I asked slOosh a question on ONE of your posts, and you responded with "omg marv are you really going to start that shit again you're so wrong you always tunnel me why do you even bother". Oh and "marv could be scum but I don't think stupidity is a scumtrait" again referring to a question I asked someone else. Bully my fucking ass. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 00:13 raynpelikoneet wrote: Why shouldn't you? If i am town i have genuine reasons to believe he is town. If i am mafia i already know he is town, thus my reasons might not be genuine. Why are you not trying to read me at all? Have you just decided that i am town or do you somehow know i am town? You're about my strongest townread and you share a townread on someone I have a townread on. It's just not very interesting. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 00:15 cDgCorazon wrote: Marv if you think I'm town, why are you talking about me then? The point of the game is to catch scum. I was asked about you. Did you not read that about ten minutes ago? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 00:34 raynpelikoneet wrote: Is it expected he is going to step up and play the game at any point if town? And if mafia? He'll probably post somewhat more as town than mafia. Believe it or not his current posting frequency is reasonably decent compared to what he can do. As time goes by as town he starts to care more and state his opinion and make a decent post or two, as mafia he'll just stay doing jack shit the whole game. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 00:42 DarthPunk wrote: You should vote for obvious cause we aren't lynching hapa day one. Hapa's been lynched day 1 before and he was mafia. That's a cop out excuse DP. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 01:00 DarthPunk wrote: Hapa is not someone you lynch day one. Just like you. If he is scum it will be obvious later. It's not worth the risk of mislynching town hapa. I said all this before. Yes, but you're wrong. No-one is unlynchable day 1. The reason it's a particularly bad idea to lynch me in particular day 1 is because my style swings around a lot so it's hard to get an accurate read. Hapa is actually a paragon of consistency. Why don't you just comment on the case? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Not all the lurkers are gonna be mafia, so if you're town make an effort guise, pretty plz. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 01:09 DarthPunk wrote: I don't agree. Hapa is rarely a good lynch day one. You're becoming an increasingly good lynch. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
##Unvote ##Vote: DarthPunk Also Oats/yamato, whatever you two are doing it's not helpful. Here, Oats, I went into yamato's filter myself for you just so you can stop asking him the same thing over and over. + Show Spoiler + On June 21 2013 14:29 yamato77 wrote: He just hasn't done anything that would make me swing either way about him. This continued angry-man act is a bit disconcerting. On June 21 2013 14:32 yamato77 wrote: It's precisely that neither of you have done anything particularly townish at all that worries me. It's obviously early, but I have quite a few soft town reads already. On June 22 2013 17:31 yamato77 wrote: Do you think DP seems particularly interested in this game? I don't. You being timid in a game is how you seem as mafia. I don't like that you seem sheepish with your timing of questioning me right after Oats and DP state their suspicion of me. On June 23 2013 00:42 yamato77 wrote: My reads have been consistent the whole game. Anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional, or simply can't read. DP, your lack of giving a fuck about this game is exactly why I think you could be mafia. You haven't attempted to figure out anything in the game aside from at the very start, which is a poor way to play. It's easy to fake interest and involvement for a short period of time, but obviously your interest in this game has waned significantly over the course of the day, which is a trait I would associate with mafia, no matter how good he supposedly is. Cora, you think I'm scum every game we play in. Take a step back, realize that I've been attempting to figure this game out with Hapa and Marv for a while, and go take a reread of the game where you don't assume that I'm mafia. I used to tunnel like you every game, but it gets you nowhere. What do you think about OO, Shaiopi, or Darthpunk? On June 23 2013 00:55 yamato77 wrote: Your reads are essentially the same as they were over 24 hours ago and you basically refuse to talk about anything else. No, you aren't involved in figuring out the game. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
![]() You don't get to decide who we do and don't lynch today, and whether you've been social or not, whatever you've done since you've got back hasn't been productive. It shouldn't be beyond the wit of man, even an Australian! to comment on something that's been written. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 01:31 Oatsmaster wrote: So why do you think he downright refuses to talk about anything as scum? Same question for town to you ![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 01:35 Oatsmaster wrote: cause he doesnt want to derail lynch train on OO which you guys successfully did. Well done. Notice OO is gone. Actually you derailed it by asking yamato the same question 10 times to the point I had to filter him myself for you, and DP derailed it by simply not engaging with rayn on the case (as he's just done) and moving on. OO has indeed gone and I hope he's still reading. slOosh and Ange are still gone. ##Unvote: DarthPunk I was pretty much only voting him as significant pressure because he was irritating the shit out of me. One of the wise things that Dandel has said that people who irritate the shit out of you are rarely mafia. And we got an answer. If there isn't scum between OO/slOosh/Ange I'll be amazed. We need to concentrate on them imo. Out of yamato/DP/Hapa I feel strongest about yamato being town. I know rayn/cora/oats/whoever disagrees, but that's where I'm at. I agree with yamato that Hapa is doing a job like he's not managed very well before of looking town and interested, my primary counterpoint to this is how he seems to be suspicious of rayn when to me rayn should be one of his strongest townreads. that's worrying to me. For DP, maybe he's scum, maybe he isn't. His early game seemed townish to me and he's just been stubborn now. For me at least he has to wait because he hasn't done anything massively lynchable today. I'm back to Obvious. ##Vote: Obvious | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 01:44 Oatsmaster wrote: well basically my point about asking yamato is because he doesnt have enough content in his filter about DP to replace a case. Just general impression "NOT INTERESTED IN THE GAME". Which is highly subjective. Also he never asks DP anything. Notice that Yamato only votes for DP after he is under some pressure. Almost all of mafia is subjective, and I'd say interest in the game is one of the very top ways I try to distinguish town from mafia. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 01:47 Oatsmaster wrote: Is DP interested Marv? DP was interested in the first half of the game, and in fairness to the guy his activity on Saturday is literally always fairly non-existent. He simply does things on Saturdays and you can verify that in any game he ever plays. At the very least I think he's a particularly bad lynch for today. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
People I think are town to varying degrees: Corazon Oats rayn yamato People I have reason to think they're both town and mafia: ShiaoPi goodkarma People I'm unsure about but I think they're bad lynches: Hapahauli Sylencia DarthPunk Coagulation People that I'd like to kill: Ange slOosh Obvious Oh and Oats, just because someone has a different interpretation to me doesn't make them mafia, and DP *has* been afk (I'm just willing to easily accept his Saturday thing). I'm afk for a few hours for working out/eating/domestics etc. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 02:01 Oatsmaster wrote: address the other stuff about yamato. Fine he sucks at scumhunting. What about the other stuff. I've talked about yamato enough, it's all in my filter. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 02:05 Oatsmaster wrote: how would you be convinced that he is scum? There's around a 0% chance I will lynch yamato today. And yes I know I said I was going afk, I'm just changing n shit ![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 02:06 Oatsmaster wrote: I kinda think hes scum for thinking yamato is town. Also random vote on DP for no reason. But its marv. I dont know. Just means I think differently and better to you. There isn't an answer to your question. "if he played like scum". He's playing like a townie. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 03:25 Coagulation wrote: Marv so far has completely failed to put any pressure at all on me. He seems content with leaving me fucking off calling him scum like herpderp because he knows its not gonna gain traction. Instead hes focused on the bigger players in the game cause he doesnt see me as a threat.. town marv wouldnt be so passive about me IMO. I'm just catching up before my shower. Are you serious? I always ignore you day 1 because you're completely worthless. You're just completely uninteresting and there's no point interacting with someone who just says pointless shit for no reason. This is the first time I've seen you try to make a "sensible" comment but it's bullshit and it stinks horribly. How much did we interact on day 1 in the last omgus game we played? Did I even talk to you once? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Actually scumslips DO exist, 2/3 of the scumteam in Dr Who demonstrably scumslipped. However, this is not one of those occasions. I'm on page 42 and I'm starting to get wobbly jellies about this OO thing, so ##unvote | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:25 yamato77 wrote: For example, it obviously not you or Marv. I doubt that Sloosh, GK, OO, or Coag made the vote. That leaves shiao/ange/adam as all afk lurkers who wouldn't have had the timing to made the vote. Oats, Rayn, and Cora have no reason to hide their suspicion of me. Who is it, then? DP is the only one that makes any sense. And it's obviously not a town vote. Terrible reasoning yamato, I've done role-shenannies before as mafia and I made sure I stayed the fuck out of the thread when I did so for precisely this reason. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 05:28 cDgCorazon wrote: I have a strong feeling about DP being town for a couple of reasons: 1. His play has been productive and level-headed for most of the game. He is contributing to discussion and I don't believe he is hiding anything. His play seems very genuine to me and he has been very logical and reasonable in everyone he has analyzed. I don't see anything in his filter that looks scummy to me. 2. There have been a couple points where Hapa has been under fire. Instead of joining the wagon or not saying anything, DP has come out multiple (at least 5 times) to say that a Hapa lynch is a really stupid idea due to Hapa's importance to town. It would be so easy for scum DP to jump on the Hapa lynch train or to just sit out of the way and let a Hapa lynch train form. The fact that he went out of his way to defend Hapa means that he wants to keep Hapa alive for as long as possible, which would be super beneficial to town. DP may be town, but the second point is totally bad. Good scumplayers, of which DP is one, do this sort of thing all the time so players make these sort of defences for them. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 05:39 yamato77 wrote: It just lines up too well, man. I don't think DP expected the votecount to get posted then. He left and placed it at the same time. It's just too perfect. Yes and it's a conspiracy theory above all and you know how those go. If you're lynching someone because of vote timings and when people are in the thread when I *know* from my own experiences that mafia carefully plan around these things, then you're doing it wrong. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 05:49 Hapahauli wrote: Btw, can someone confirm to me that GK doesn't read his role PM's on Day 1? I know he mentioned it in Les Mis Mini, but I haven't seen it anywhere else from him. Actually he promised me he wouldn't do such shenannies this game. It's in some thread somewhere but I can't remember where. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 17 2013 09:28 goodkarma wrote: And out of respect for you as a player, I promise no day one shenannies Marv | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 06:01 Hapahauli wrote: Hm ok. Because of all the people in the thread, I think his play is objectively the scummiest. He's off doing his own thing with Shiao, and doesn't seem interested in pushing his case at all. He kinda just dropped a case, said he was voting Shiao, and fucked off. I've heard not a peep from you about what you said about rayn, by the way. What gives? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 06:21 Hapahauli wrote: Marv, where do you stand in all of the consolidation talks btw? Who do you want to lynch? I dunno :/ Basically waiting for slOosh / Ange to report their findings. coag's just a crapshoot. Obvious sounded better but now he's disappeared again. I'm just browsing GK's filter since you mentioned him. What's the strongest point(s) against him would you say? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 06:35 Ange777 wrote: I am still only on page 36 and so far I would like to lynch DarthPunk. Hapa, you said, I should concentrate on GK or ShiaoPi but I haven't seen them posting yet. I think this is the problem dear. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
1) the oats thing was early enough that i think it's reasonable enough that he didn't pursue it 2) he did pursue/talk about you quite a bit on page 3/4 of your filter 3) I think you have a pretty valid point about the policy lynch thing. You made it abundantly clear it would be a policy lynch and what the policy was, even if you were leaning town on Oats. I'm not exactly sure where I lean on it because I *do* think it's pretty dumb to want to policy lynch you're leaning town on, and I can understand anyone being upset about that, but on the other hand I don't think DP should have been *that* incredulous. hrmdehrm :x | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 06:45 Hapahauli wrote: That kinda read as scummy to me. He's just picking a fight and getting angry over something stupid and random. I think Oats was right though, as mafia why not just answer the question? I can understand as town thinking you were a dumb lynch and not wanting to talk about it. Why even pick a fight there? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 06:46 ObviousOne wrote: Let's say for the sake of playing Devil's Advocate that I'm wrong about DP and that your view makes the most sense: the period when I was around was, what, 6-9 hours into the game? That means that it was pretty early in the game to be making hard scum stances which does make some sense. Not everyone had checked in, middle of the night for probably half of the players in the game, etc. That means that his vote on me devolves into a policy lynch. Specifically, his evidence is that I fucked off (that I was not here is undeniable and I won't even contest it). What makes his POLICY lynch better than mine? Perhaps DP didn't take into consideration that I didn't want a repeat of Carnival N0 where I tunneled the hell out of him for something that I was stupid about (the miller claim) knowing full well that if I get into it with him it's probably going to shit up the thread. No, that's not a policy lynch. At least not in my eyes. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 06:48 ObviousOne wrote: Lurker lynch is not a policy lynch? Just asking because that's how I see his final push on me with this stuff. Maybe you see it differently? Ugh... it's a bit complicated. Mafia like to lurk, and a true lurker policy lynch is just drawing one of them out of a hat and lynching that one, rather than expand on why this lurker in particular. And he did expand on why you in particular. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 06:50 slOosh wrote: Right now I'm spending time looking into the context of DP's stance on ObviousOne. He professes having problems reading OO. I'm double checking to see what gives him the bolster of confidence. Me voting for him obvs | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Screw him being absent and screw his terrible case on Oats. I don't buy his explanation about the meta thing very much, because he *was* bringing him up on that basis and that basis was bad. I'm also still failing to understand why he was so shocked that Oats wanted to kill yamato for having backflipped reads after being suspicious of Hapa and DP. I was flicking through gk's filter in I Swear (I understand that he was mafia) but GK does seem to be pretty aware of Oats' meta in general. I simply don't get how he could be so suspicious of Oats at that stage for what Oats had done. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 06:54 slOosh wrote: So did he follow up with you when you unvoted OO? He's australian and went to bed, not unreasonably. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 06:58 slOosh wrote: Marv could I get a follow up on this one? Why wouldn't town DP just say from the getgo instead of refusing to do it? The point about it is that it drew a massive amount of attention to himself, namely 3 votes in a very short space of time. It can't have been that unsurprising that he was irritating the shit out of people, rayn/me/someone else was all over him for it, yet he still held out. I don't get the attention-drawing thing as mafia. I'd agree with you that as a townie he should just answer it too, it just makes even less sense for mafia to make themselves look terrible for no good reason, whereas townies think about that less | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 07:04 slOosh wrote: Marv you don't think DP is someone who is comfortable with pressure as scum? Also want to echo Ange777's question there's a difference between being comfortable with pressure and bringing massive, unnecessary pressure on to yourself, don't you think? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 07:04 Ange777 wrote: So what exactly do you need hapa to push for? For a GK lynch? Why not try to push others yourself? I don't care what Hapa pushes for, I just want him pushing. He's stated willingness to lynch into players but he's not drawn his line in the sand yet. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 07:07 Hapahauli wrote: I'd like to think I've been pushing discussion quite well for the past two hours. If you want me to lock onto a single read, well I just went and did it (though somewhat reluctantly). I do as well think GK is the better lynch, but I can't say with a straight face that I wouldn't mind seeing DP hang. And it looks like your attitude is exactly the same. It is. But time is running short and as I'm not totes sure I wanted to know where you stood. On June 22 2013 21:29 goodkarma wrote: I don't see why you'd tell us this, and then sit on said writeup... We have 10 1/2 hours before lynch, and it seems we're nowhere close to coming to some kind of consolidation. If you have some kind of damning super-convincing case on Hapa/Yamato, why not get it out in the open now? His last post is particularly annoying, because he's talking about consolidation and then... poof! | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 07:08 slOosh wrote: I think you are overemphasizing the 3 votes a bit - you saw that they were quickly removed as they were put on. You said yourself it doesn't make sense for town DP to do that either. So I don't understand how you are using something alignment null to say DP is leaning town. Because I said it makes a lot less sense for mafia to do that. Pretty sure I said that already slOosh. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 07:12 slOosh wrote: Ehh ... maybe we're just splitting hairs on playstyle ... whatever. Could I ask for your general feel of ShiaoPi? Yes. I deplore his opening yamato post/jab, and I don't like his disappearance, and his posting seems to lack depth. In contrast, I felt his explanations for his opening post came across really sincerely. I also thought it was diligent to pick GK up on the specifics of Oats' meta (about tunnelling and how that was later than Day 1). Overall he's pretty null, and this explanation might help you understand why i put him under the heading I did in my list :p | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 07:26 ObviousOne wrote: The "fuck off, I'm doing my thang", thang? The inb4 null thing. As scum he'd have to be in the mindset of taunting his (presumably) town mislynch attempt. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 07:29 slOosh wrote: Marv, could I have your thoughts on Hapa's general attitude toward DP? They seem fairly similar to mine, so I don't have that much to say about it really. Ange and OO both make some compelling points but it's just not a wagon I feel comfortable on, nor do I have the confidence that DP is town to discourage the wagon massively. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 07:30 Hapahauli wrote: Depends on how DP flips I suppose. I gander I'd look pretty terrible if he flipped red :3 ROFL. That's hilarious because I ain't gonna lie, those thoughts have run through my head too ![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 07:34 Hapahauli wrote: Yeah, I just feel awful in this situation. I want to lynch GK, but I almost want to see DP flip more >> Me too. I think we're bad people. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 07:35 slOosh wrote: Ok that's definitely not the direction we want to be heading. Could you reiterate your hesitations on lynching DP / larger sureness on lynching GK? DP was really active early and I'm generally loathe to lynch active players who I know are going to be active in days to come unless I'm really convinced by it. And yes, he's not pushed his lynch(es) very hard and that doesn't look great, but it doesn't look so not-great that I'm convinced by the lynch. goodkarma has defects in that I don't understand his thought process in Oats, and he's pulled a disappearing act. And in contrast to DP, he's not one of those active players I know I'll be able to get a handle on later. GK doesn't have the redeeming feature that during any stage of the game he seemed particularly interested, unlike DP. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Why is that ok again? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Can we just lynch GK? Does anyone have a good reason not to? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 07:43 Hapahauli wrote: It's funny. But generally if I'm thinking along the lines of marv, it means he's town, so it's an odd but comforting feeling. Let's be honest, it's the scummiest town brofist you're ever likely to see, lol | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 07:45 slOosh wrote: One reason I want to lynch DP over GK is that he prefaces his suspicions of "hey, I always find them scummy". It's a cop out of responsibility. Why DP over Shiao then, who did the same thing with yamato? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 07:54 Ange777 wrote: DP chose to not contribute by only posting one-liners while goodkarma was just completely missing. While I can see a town motivation for goodkarma (by simply being busy) I can't do that for DP. Therefore my scum read on DP is stronger than my scum read on goodkarma. DP hasn't only posted oneliners, I think that's a pretty big misrepresentation right there | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 07:11 cDgCorazon wrote: I really feel like DP lynch would be really terrible so I would go for any other option besides DP. GK is in that list of people who have played subpar and I would be up for his lynch. Right now there is a clusterfuck of people who have played like this. Might as well get rid of one of them now (as Hapa said). ##Unvote ##Vote: Goodkarma seriously, why nothing after this? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 07:57 slOosh wrote: Could be away for whatever reason? Is it making you doubt the GK lynch? The opposite. Corazon is sure DP is town yet isn't investing his effort getting people off it. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 08:00 slOosh wrote: Cora scum, DP town, GK scum scenario where cora is trying to look good by risking to put his vote on a teammate? Something like that, yes. It does fly in the face of my previous townread on Cora, but I hate when people apparently have strong convictions about something, were around not long before the lynch and just let things happen. That doesn't sit right with me | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 08:12 cDgCorazon wrote: This is why I never talk about my town reads. Anyways, I'm not entirely sure if I should claim seeing as I'm getting lynched tomorrow. I'm pretty curious why you didn't try to move the lynch off DP if he was a townread of yours. Why just drop your vote on GK and afk? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 08:13 Coagulation wrote: yeah bro nice last ditch attempt to swing the lynch onto me to save your scum buddy. your pretty much day 2 lynch in my book ez if marv survives. If I survive (?) why wouldn't you want to lynch me? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Jeez. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 08:23 Coagulation wrote: well we will find out tonight. You do realise if you're vigi and broadcasting your shot, there's only one scenario in which you don't get roleblocked, yes? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 08:36 Coagulation wrote: how the fuck are you people getting town reads on marv. hes playing so scummy..... no I'm not, and repeating the mantra over and over doesn't make it so either. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 08:38 Coagulation wrote: he doesnt even give a shit if im town or not entire day 1. he took zero initiative to get a fucking read on me.... thats not townie marv.. I get drilled day 1 every game when he town. That's a flat-out lie. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 05:30 marvellosity wrote: I'm just catching up before my shower. Are you serious? I always ignore you day 1 because you're completely worthless. You're just completely uninteresting and there's no point interacting with someone who just says pointless shit for no reason. This is the first time I've seen you try to make a "sensible" comment but it's bullshit and it stinks horribly. How much did we interact on day 1 in the last omgus game we played? Did I even talk to you once? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Go find me our interactions in that omgus game then. I'll wager you'll find practically nothing. "Yepperz" | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
The worst of it is, I can't even take the no reasoning / bad reasoning / lies as a scumtell, because it's just a habitual thing. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 08:55 Coagulation wrote: so you fucking admit your acting fucking different to me now. and I dont give a shit what you say about the skill level at omgus that has nothing to do with this game. So how about going to find that interaction we had on Day 1 in that game? For the third time at least: you're gonna find nothing. My plan ever since internally groaning when I saw you sign up was to ignore you until I had good reasons to possibly think you were mafia. Which I still don't have. Get over it. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 12:27 Oatsmaster wrote: cause i feel like his play in this game is way different from his play in ISWEAR. There he just occasionally posted null reads and stuff and never really interacted with the thread. Here, he pushed me, push shiao pi. So when marv has bad reasoning for both GK and Yamato, its really not great. Doesnt mean right = good reasoning for yamato. My reasoning is good, but you are bad. Sorry dude. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 15:23 cDgCorazon wrote: @Adam Thanks for the feedback. No one really brought it up before and no one really talked about it after I posted so I just wanted to make sure I was somewhere on the right track. @GK You do bring up a good point with Marv. Those posts illustrate your point very well, but they're not too far out of the way a townie who is simply misreading would post. I'll wait until Marv makes a rebuttal to make a real decision about his scumminess. I'm going to bed. Looking forward to seeing more people post tomorrow. you're joking right? What did I 'misread'? If GK was town and I wanted to lynch him instead of DP, I sure as hell would have done it differently than pushing him a couple of times an hour before lynch while simultaneously saying repeatedly I'd kinda like to see DP flip as well. If you think that's how I'd play as scum you have nowhere near enough respect for my scumplay. On June 23 2013 14:50 Hapahauli wrote: Anyway, it looks like I've gotten everything out of Oats that I will for a while. I'm not as sure that he's scum anymore. He's responding fairly quickly and not showing very much guilt while doing so. While his answers are incoherent and unprepared, they do make sense provided that he was calling me scum in order to "poke" me and see how I'd react. I still find him "poking" somewhat uncharacteristic for his town-game (he's usually much more direct/forceful with his reads), but I'll need to sleep on it and see what his actual reads end up being before I make a final judgement call. I pretty much agree with this post in its entirety. I also think rayn's push on Hapa is looking pretty insane right now. Hapa just doesn't look like mafia at all. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
cDgCorazon ShiaoPi - his continued absence today looks *really* bad. He's on a different timezone so he's spent the whole of Sunday not being here at all. Scummy as fuck. Hapahauli - looks really townie to me after catching up DarthPunk Ange777 - pushed DP lynch marvellosity goodkarma - really not sure, will have to see where his suspicions/interactions with me go. Coagulation Adam4167 - his posts read natural, haven't looked in any depth though yamato77 - told you so ObviousOne - was blatantly supposed to be the mislynch yesterday. He comes the most confirmed town to me after this flip raynpelikoneet - was looking really townie to me, but this tunnel on Hapa is ridiculous slOosh - just not sure Somewhere along the line I have too much green somewhere I guess. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 20:24 Ange777 wrote: Marv, I don't understand how you can give Adam a townish read when he actually voted for the "wrong" person. He did replace someone so yes, he get's some more time but how can you put Adam above Sloosh? Sloosh's vote was the one vote that secured the DP lynch. I *think* I have a pretty good grasp on Adam's posting style as town and mafia, and at the moment I'm not seeing the mafia (stilted, contrived vs more open, etc). You're right though, slOosh probably does deserve more green. I'm also well aware that it is "scum-motivated" not to be on the scum wagon, but given Adam's circumstances I find it difficult to hold against him, it's really really hard to say he wouldn't have done what he did as a townie too | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 20:34 Ange777 wrote: To be honest I really don't see scum ShiaoPi right now. Yes, his inactivity is troubling but in I Swear he showed that he can actually play scum differently. Reverting back to his absolutely lurking scum meta from the past just simply does not make any sense for me. Given he obviously finds playing scum difficult, given his past, it wouldn't surprise me at all if having to play 2 scumgames in a row was very demoralising. Personally I find playing scum very difficult and when I have to play more than one in succession it wears me down. Excusing someone for lurkiness when there's even less reason, imo, not to be in the thread as *town* isn't very good reasoning. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 20:38 Ange777 wrote: That would leave us with your other scum read goodkarma. I am not so sure whether I really can believe that we had two scum as our lynch targets on day 1 ... seems unlikely. Not impossible, but unlikely. I haven't seen much from him to actually change my mind about his play but in light of the flip I am unsure about lynching him. I still want to see a second scum read from him. Happens more often than you think, I ran (and got) mayor in LIX based on lynching between 2 mafia candidates, I got in trouble in Fruity for opposing a mafia lynch to push another mafia lynch, in Dr Who the lynch was between two mafia, Hydra 2 as well. That said I understand what you mean, but it's pretty hard for me to exonerate GK especially as two people besides me on the wagon (Cora, Hapa) I don't think are mafia | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 20:43 Ange777 wrote: Marv, actually I would like you to explain more about your read on Cora and rayn as well. rayn seems to me to have put in some of the most effort on Day 1 into solving the game. A lot of his posts show inquisitive thinking and trying to determine motives. He just seems very interested in solving the game. I feel somewhat less strongly than I did on Day 1 for reason already mentioned, so we'll see where he goes from here. I agree with... um... someone? :D who said that DP flipping red actually makes Corazon look quite a bit better than DP flipping green. If they're mafia together then Corazon really didn't try to push the lynch off DP onto GK at all. The issue with this is that it relies on the assumption that GK is green, which isn't one we can really make with any certainty at this stage. Other than that his posts read genuine enough, his bitch argument with me is the same bitch argument we always seem to have when he's town. He seems to care although his absence around the lynch is a bit concerning. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Tell me what you're thinking about him, then? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 21:14 Ange777 wrote: Just to be clear, I had Cora as town until that halfhearted push on goodkarma. But take that push and his seemingly opportunistic (blue) role claim or not claim (why even mention it? Mentioning it can only be in order to make people doubt their scum read on him and will make him prone for possible roleblocks) and I don't see how you can so happily put him on your town list. If he is indeed mafia, then mafia will have to waste their roleblock on him now, rather than searching for 'real' blues. I'd argue the blue-claim is more him being a dejected arse. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 21:28 Ange777 wrote: Well if he is indeed mafia, then I believe he has sucessfully made town worry about killing off their blues. I assume you meant "if he is indeed blue"? I am racking my brain but I really have difficulties to understand what you are trying to explain to me. Is it this? Cora has a town read on DarthPunk (flipped scum). He says he doesn't want his town read DarthPunk dead, therefore votes goodkarma. Only if we know that goodkarma is green and Cora tried to push the lynch from a scum player to a town player, we can peg him as scum? What if - speculations incoming - goodkarma is a mafia goon. Losing their mafia goon instead of their godfather would certainly be a better trade, especially as DarthPunk is considered a better scum player than goodkarma by a lot of us. If the above really is what you wanted to tell me, than I don't think it's logic is as sound as you think it is. No, I meant if he's mafia fakeclaiming, then they're gonna have to hide their roleblock on him otherwise he's gonna have to answer some tricky questions. So they won't be roleblocking other, potential blues. Also no, that's not what I was getting at at all. Sigh. That's not what I've written either, I guess it's a language barrier thing. I'm trying to say that Corazon would look signifcantly *worse* if GK was also scum rather than if GK was town (because in this scenario Corazon barely tried to get the lynch off DP). | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
What the fuck is wrong with so many people this game going "why u talk about x" when every single time it's because the person was asked about x. Christ. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 22:28 Ange777 wrote: Marv, I remember you being pretty active and vocal and pushy. You feel very reserved in this game. And I don't like that. How did you go from here ... ... to here ... ... to here in the end? You were willing to lynch Sloosh or me in your first post. Later on, both of us had only posted a "I am back." post and you seem to have forgotten about wanting to lynch one of us. What is missing as well is commenting on goodkarma between the first post and your vote post. In your list post, you had three possible lynch candidates. Even if you take away Obvious after your conversation, you still had two other candidates. And you gave both of them a pretty easy way out because neither of us was really pressured when we came back. Instead you vote someone who you said could possibly be town as well. If we assume that you had put Sloosh and me on the To Kill List because of inactivity, nothing really promised that we would be more active just by the "I am back post". Combine the above with you trying to soft push for a goodkarma lynch instead of DarthPunk repeatedly (which goodkarma himself already pointed out as possibly scum motivated), I am very suspicious of you right now. I don't really see the problem? Unless you currently have a scumread on yourself or on slOosh? By that point Obvious had already started making me re-evaluate my read on DP from leaning town-do not lynch to these are valid points-how comfortable am I lynching him. Although neither of you had posted much since you got back to the thread, what you'd posted seemed reasonable enough and that was borne out by how the time leading up to the lynch developed. I don't really understand what I'm supposed to be answering for here. There were literally no strong wagons at all until late in the day, and your contention is that I was mafia just crossing my fingers and hoping we lynched a townie without doing anything about it? Are you serious? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 24 2013 00:54 ObviousOne wrote: Holy shit Oats has one solitary scum game in his profile and it's Ego? I'm fucked. He was scum in Dr Who | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 24 2013 01:01 slOosh wrote: Hey marv, could you do me a favor and reread Hapa's filter concerning his stance on DP / GK? I want to see if you come to the same conclusion as I did. Not really interested in doing that, I've got a pretty decent townread on Hapa. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 24 2013 01:35 slOosh wrote: >.> Please comment on the main content of my post rather than the little blurb. There's not a great deal to say about it. I agree, objectively it doesn't look great. In an extremely similar fashion to how my actions around the lynch don't look great either. I can fully empathise with his stance. This 'objectively' not looking great stuff is, for me, easily trumped by the meta read and feels I have on Hapa, and his extremely clear interest in the game and in constructive dialogue with other players. Further I'd note that at least a couple of your quotes deal with him saying that assuming DP was the secret voter was stupid, and he was right, DP wasn't the secret voter. I'm not sure what you're trying to make of that. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
You said he was using the secret vote to lynch into the lurkers, I understood it that he wanted to lynch into the lurkers anyway, and he was stating that there was a decent chance the secret vote came from them. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 24 2013 01:46 slOosh wrote: Perhaps the order was flipped, but it should stand as a point against, not for, voting lurkers, based on his previous post no? The two are distinct. 1) hapa wants to lynch into lurkers --- 2) the secret vote could well have come from lurkers --- 1 isn't because of 2, 1 and 2 are just co-existing. I think you're reading WAY too much into what he said about his assumptions of where the secret vote came from. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 24 2013 01:52 slOosh wrote: You may very well be correct - if you think it's a null point, that's fine, not worth hashing out another page to clarify a small part of the larger case. pg 57~60 when you can please! I just browsed it and you're going to have to be very specific about what you're looking for. Maybe I'm confirmation biasing because I think Hapa looks pretty town, but Hapa comes out of that looking better than rayn does imo, and I believe I've stated similar already. The main thing I took from that is him neglecting to name me in people who are hard to mislynch, when my ratio is better than his. Curses. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
The thing we must absolutely not do is let players like gk and ShiaoPi slink by through lynches as town wonderfully lynches into active players. Any of you who played or watched Smurf, think about that game and why I'm saying this. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 24 2013 02:01 raynpelikoneet wrote: marvellosity do you think my case on Hapa boiled down to him being asleep and him and yamato both being scum and nothing more when you read it? The three main points as I see them are 1) his suspicions on you are dodgy (which I agreed with at the time) 2) he was taking yamato's answers at face-value and accepting them 3) he wasn't being town-leadery | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 24 2013 02:17 raynpelikoneet wrote: And 4) He suddenly went off from questioning GK, his top scumread and focused on completely different things. Now, how does Hapa's answers to me last night make sense again? Shrug, he wasn't being 100% reasonable but to be honest neither were you. The dialogue was all kinda useless. If you're interested in some supplementary reading, go check out Palmar's smurf game from last autumn. Hapa was playing under the smurf Douglas Quaid and was at various points not particularly reasonable to suspicions directed at him. The way I read the exchanges with you is that he felt your suspicions on him weren't justified and he was just shutting them down arrogantly. The issue with this is that it doesn't really help the person with the scumread on him stop having a scumread on him (you can see that in the game I referenced too), but on the other hand in the situation I think that Hapa is town, I can understand him doing that. In all honesty I'd much rather Hapa talked about this with you rather than me talking about this with you, because this is only my interpretation. If you / others in the thread perceive how he dealt with your case as a problem, then he needs to deal with it himself. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 24 2013 04:24 Hapahauli wrote: @ Marv Can you explain your reads on sloOsh (seemingly null) and Coag (strong town) respectively? I have sloOsh at very strong town given how much sense he's making. Also regardless of GK's allignment, he was the hammer vote on the Godfather, which makes me incredibly skeptical of any sort of suspicion on him. As for Coag, I'm not sure what his behavioral tells are, but his vote on DP actually isn't that important. It wasn't made in the last minute scramble, and almost seemed like a throwaway vote made in the middle of D1 when DP had virtually no chance of getting lynched. coag actually voting for mafia is one of the strongest tells you're going to get out of him probably. And he still seems more interested than I think he would be as mafia. And yes, I already conceded slOosh should have been greener than I put him. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 24 2013 05:35 cDgCorazon wrote: That doesn't give you an excuse to do nothing the rest of the game. It does mean lecturing him is a completely counterproductive thing to do though. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 24 2013 06:51 Hapahauli wrote: There's some very objectionable analysis in this paragraph. The argument that he changed his scum-play for the worse isn't very compelling. I can point to several of his town games where he acts just like this. In fact, Mafia LXII comes to mind - a game that you both played in. I'm surprised at the lack of sympathy you have for the "afk" thing, given that you used it in your own defense earlier this game and was afk for a good portion of this game yourself. Frankly I find the contention that a player who's lurked in many scumgames and been active in one, we should assume he's going to be active in this one too, on top of what I said about playing more than one scumgame in a row. In fact you yourself should know how horrible it is to play consecutive scumgames. The argument seems to be that a mafia player would make a special effort to be active and involved, whereas a townplayer would not make this effort. When has it ever been this way round, ever? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 24 2013 06:59 Hapahauli wrote: My point isn't that Shiao is super town. It's that the things that GK is attacking him for are null-tells. And frankly I'm more interested in hearing GK talk for himself. I need to establish his alignment right now, as that is the most pressing thing. You suggested earlier that his inactivity was a null-tell or even a slight town-tell, and I'm telling you why I totally disagree with that. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Don't do the martyr thing, it makes your skin go spotty and none of the girls will like you. Just explain what you did and if you are actually town there's a legitimate explanation. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 24 2013 07:20 goodkarma wrote: That was Hiro sorry my bad. Hopefully he doesn't modkill me for mistaking him for Shao O.O I'm sure he'd be honoured actually ![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 24 2013 07:33 cDgCorazon wrote: They haven't had a thread presence. They haven't been trying to push their reads and they haven't been contributing to the discussion. The only big action they've done is voting for DP, and they did it mostly out of the blue. They didn't decide to commit to anything before the vote and for the most part, they haven't done much after the lynch either. I don't know where they stand and I still can't get a good read on them, which worries me greatly. Wouldn't you agree that OO is practically certain to be town, given he was DP's mislynch of choice yesterday? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
gg. For what it's worth, I really was playing for town. glhf | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
OO threw the game by shooting Oats, really. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On July 05 2013 08:12 ObviousOne wrote: I dunno. Don't know how to close out a scum game yet. Tried to make it look like it was sloosh's shot but I guess I fucked up enough D1. No, this is exactly the opposite of why you lost. D1 gave you enormous town-cred which you frittered away on all the subsequent days by doing jack shit, as amply pointed out by Adam. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
| ||