| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
There aren't any watchers or trackers, it doesn't matter if the one doing the kill is roleblocked and he can still use any abilities that he may have. Is there a mistake in the OP or is one mafia delivering the kill just something you do since it's done every game? Will a Serial Killer be able to choose what role he appears to Role Cops if he chooses investigation immune? Oh and is the Jailkeeper intended to protect his target from all KP instead of just one? And before I forget, /in. | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
| ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
| ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
On April 22 2013 09:40 Promethelax wrote: I can also smurf into the game to help with your ratios. Smurfing isn't fun if we know it's you. | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
Totally legit unless someone planned smurfing in a newbie almost a year ago | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
On May 01 2013 18:25 ObviousOne wrote: This game is going to be amazing. You don't say? | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
On May 03 2013 21:15 kitaman27 wrote: The game will begin tonight at 02:00 GMT (+00:00). We could still use a few replacements if anyone is interested. Another 3 AM deadline  | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
On May 04 2013 12:38 VayneAuthority wrote: this will be rough considering it is a no clue game. First day of lynching is just purely a guess at this point, ill probably get the ball rolling later once I see some more posts Why post something like this instead of trying to create discussion? On May 04 2013 12:10 Spicydinosaur wrote: Hey all, looking forward to a fun game. I agree with the general notion that lurking should be dissuaded and active posting should be encouraged. However I'd like to add that we should be on the lookout for postings that simply mask for scum, those that add little to the discussion but give the illusion of participation. Like this post of yours? I'm not sold on policy lynching. If we agree to policy lynch, it creates an easy way for scum to mask themselves in the town. And if we agree on a policy, scum can just avoid doing whatever we policy lynch for. Like just posting a bit more than the lurkiest lurker. What I suggest is leaving lurkers for our blues to handle. Scummy lurkers are shot by vigis, null lurkers are checked by cops, towny lurkers are not are a big concern. | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
But lets move away from policy discussion. I want to discuss VayneAuthority. He's just popping in and out stating that he needs more information. But he ain't doing nothing to get that information. Vayne isn't trying to start discussion. He isn't asking any questions. Just excusing not doing anything at the start. Vayne says that first day lynching is "purely a guess" but he's doing nothing to change the fact that it's a guess. He isn't trying to figure other's alingments out. But the question remains: is he a disinterested townie who doesn't know how to play on day one or is he a scummer? | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
What makes VayneAuthority suspicious to you? | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
On May 04 2013 17:23 Sugarfluff wrote: For me it's the attitude towards not lynching on the first day. I do think we should lynch, cause as I said I think mafia can use the extra time more, as well as the serial killer. This is my first game though so I'm not sure if not lynching on day 1 is a common strategy, if so I'd love to hear the reasons behind it. Where does he show his intentions of a no-lynch? | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
| ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
On May 04 2013 18:30 Targe wrote: I have to agree with jampidampi on Vayne, both of his posts are general comments, neither contribute to important discussion on day 1. Does that make him scum in your eyes? | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
On May 04 2013 22:45 Spicydinosaur wrote: I would argue that my statement is isnt a waste and adds value. This a game for new players, some of whom may not know a lot about lurking and such. This my first game so i had to do a some reading up on it and i doubt im alone on that. Making others aware of it encourages deeper reading of posts because scum will be posting. Why do you jampidampi, think it doesn't add anything? Anyone with a brain would first get an idea how to play, not just jump into a game. You're statement, when thought about a little, reads: "scum don't scumhunt". Isn't that like the first thing everyone tells you is a scumtell when they start playing? Even if they didn't read any guides on how to play, with a little bit of thinking they would arrive at similiar scumtells: scum don't contribute/fake contrinutions. And your original statement talks about posts adding little to discussion. Not about adding nothing to the discussion. In your post you just went along with the thread sentiment of policy lynching lurkers while adding something of little value that didn't advance the discussion, unless of course it was your intention all along to get called out for that post. | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
On May 04 2013 22:51 JarJarDrinks wrote: @jampidampi - First of all, what's the point of telling us you rolled town? Ooh, I called myself town, I must be scum. /sarcasm Now, to answer you about scum masking themselves w/ policy: the point of LaL is not to actually lynch the lurkers. It's to make it so there are no lurkers. We want everyone putting as much information and opinions out there. LAL = Lynch All Lurkers. How is the point of LAL not lynching the lurkers? It doesn't matter how hard you state that you will lynch all lurkers, unless you actually lynch them all there will always be lurkers. Policy lynching aims to remove a certain type of behaviour or a certain type of action from the game. If you don't enforce the policy, it may as well not be. But the wierd thing about you saying that you're not sold on policy lynching lurkers is that you then vote a lurker. This is your next post:Seems like you got sold on it pretty quickly. At this early stage, the only purpose of votes is to pile them up on someone to pile up the pressure. One or two votes mean nothing. But pile four to five on a player? He's gonna feel the pressure and do something about it. No one likes to be on the chopping block. Especially scum. They tend to slip up when under heavy pressure. At this stage, if you have no purpose for your vote, you should just put it onto someone, who already has votes. Which is what I did. And you failed to tell anyone how any of this would make me suspicious. How does anything you said point to me being scum? | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
On May 04 2013 23:27 Spicydinosaur wrote: Insults are not a productive way to get information. Your post just continues your overall assumptions of this game and apply them to everyone. When was the last time you played a game without having an idea about how to play? And nice strawman. | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
On May 05 2013 02:36 VayneAuthority wrote: So far all I can tell is that this is either going to be an easy mafia victory or the mafia is giving themselves away on the first day and are indeed newbies. Guess we will find out soon enough. What gives you this feeling? | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
On May 05 2013 02:45 nobodywonder wrote: no, it's not. you need to contribute. for example, here's a bone for you what do you think of sugarfluff's suscipion of you? what do you think of jampi's vt claim? I claimed town, not vt. | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
On May 05 2013 02:51 VayneAuthority wrote: Creating imaginary evidence based on emotions is not logic. What gives me this feeling is that either the town is quick to bandwagon on anything, or the mafia are being stupid and casting all their votes on me early. When I come up townie you can immediately go back and analyze who started the suspicions on me and who bandwagoned. How did you come to that conclusion? Can you link some of your old games, or maybe all of them? | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
| ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
And answear this. | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
| ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
| ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=407058¤tpage=8#153 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=407058¤tpage=9#168 How is that not evidence? And your filter doesn't have a post including nonbullshit analysis. You only post when someone suspects you, or to say that you need information. How is that townie at all? How could we gain any information form day one if everyone played like you? And like three players have said that they want to lynch you. How is that everyone? And why would you be emotional as scum, if you aren't emotional as a townie? Doesn't that give you away like immediately? | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
On May 05 2013 04:16 JarJarDrinks wrote: I'm not saying that we wouldn't actually lynch the lurkers if they continued to lurk. I'm saying that getting everyone to post is what the actual goal of the LaL policy is. You say scum can mask themselves by not lurking. Well GOOD, that's what we want. No, I'm saying scum can mask themselves by driving policy lynches. Because in one post you basically say that we should leave lurkers alone and let the blue roles worry about them. And then you completely 180 and say that we should pressure the Lurkers. You make this post: and then you go ahead and vote for a lurker and make this post:What happened to "leaving lurkers for our blues to handle"? I didn't make that vote to "lynch lurkers", I made that vote to pile up the pressure. It says so in the post itself. What part of it is unclear to you? | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
On May 05 2013 12:31 VayneAuthority wrote: I will divulge if im about to be lynched, otherwise I do not want the mafia to know how I think yet. Still picking up clues from this first day. Second day is when the real hunting begins. If you're town and think Targe is mafia, you want to share your analysis so that others also think he is mafia and lynch him. NO excuses. On May 05 2013 09:30 JarJarDrinks wrote: Please explain what you mean by this because that's not what you said at all. You specifically said "scum can just avoid doing whatever we policy lynch for. Like just posting a bit more than the lurkiest lurker". How is that driving policy lynches? On May 04 2013 15:08 jampidampi wrote: I'm not sold on policy lynching. If we agree to policy lynch, it creates an easy way for scum to mask themselves in the town. And if we agree on a policy, scum can just avoid doing whatever we policy lynch for. Like just posting a bit more than the lurkiest lurker. What I suggest is leaving lurkers for our blues to handle. Scummy lurkers are shot by vigis, null lurkers are checked by cops, towny lurkers are not are a big concern. The bolded and the underlined are two different things. Lately you have been concentrating on only me. Any opinions about others? | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
On May 05 2013 18:06 shirokami wrote: @spicy My phone corrects my punctuation so my posts will not lack in that manner, the hard part is to quote and paste things. My punctuation will go worse when I have no autocorrect anymore  I'm traveling as I write back to home, still many kilometers to go but hey I will post something big after I get back home.I'm sorry for not been posting anything with content. One thing is I like jarjars posts. Will tell you later why. Could you give an estimate how long it will take for you to come out with this big post? | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
shirokami and eSpi.Casey promised contributions, but they are nowhere to be seen. JarJarDrinks has only tunneled me. Reading a past town game from him, he's perfectly capable of thinking multiple people at the same time, yet here he doesn't do that. JarJar is clinging on to a single thing I said, and doesn't even consider other things I say, not to mention everything everyone else says. jrkirbys filter is a lot of nothing and a little bit lurking. In fact, I can summarize his "contributions" in two words: don't lurk. Yet that appears to be exactly what he is doing. The only other posts in his filter not about lurking are these: On May 04 2013 12:21 jrkirby wrote: jrkirby notes the correct probablity works. A null post in a vacuum, but given that it is his only contribution, it is is starting to smell like scum.@nobodywonder: Being VT in other games doesn't affect the probability of you being town in this game. You had the same probability of being scum as the rest of us. On May 05 2013 03:35 jrkirby wrote: jrkirby responds when called out. This is the only time we hear his opinions on any specific player. Nothing particularly suspicious yet. Calgar posted some reasonings pointing to Sugarfluff being scum. link I see little clear towntells in Sugarfluffs filter. It's not a strong read, but he isn't appearing very townie. VayneAuthority behaviour is really scummy. I'll not repeat previous analysis, but not sharing your though process when providing your only scumread is scummy as hell. However, this and similiar things make me want to give him just a little bit on extra time. On May 04 2013 12:38 VayneAuthority wrote: this will be rough considering it is a no clue game. First day of lynching is just purely a guess at this point, ill probably get the ball rolling later once I see some more posts I have my suspicions on Targe too, but they aren't that significant and I want see VayneAuthority says about him before anyone else analyses him. This ended being a big list post of more than half of the players in the game, but right now I'm up to lynching JarJar or jrkirby, unless something convincing comes up. | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
| ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
| ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
On May 06 2013 04:11 shirokami wrote: @jampidampi I agree on the point he has been only focusing you. and thats odd. but also, he gave some good points about you. So im not really sure about your alignments. It might be that he is just focusing his scummiest read OR he is just fake contributing. But, he indeed seems to be capable to focus many people, but is it really the real tactic? All he has done on me boils down to his interpretation on two unclear (in retrospect) posts on my part. Then when he finally votes me, he ignores my latest response to him. That is the only thing for which he calls me scum, and it isn't very convincing. And there are three scummers, so hunting down one will only get you so far. If you concentrate on just one person, what will you do when he flips? You are back to square one. If he flips town, you are even further behind. If you pressure multiple scumreads, you have more to analyse after your target dies. Consider a case when the rest of town doesn't listen to you. If you hadn't focused on just one guy, you'd have a second scumread, and could push for his lynch/consolidate on him. On May 06 2013 04:13 shirokami wrote: @Jampi pretty null, few townvibes but nothing else on others. We will get the first few facts in next two phases and that will make the game pretty much. Who give you townvibes? What is your read on Calgar? You mention him, but you reach no conclusion, just mention that his filter is not fun, what's that even supposed to mean? That it's scummy? That it lacks contributions? That it lacks posts? | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
| ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
| ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
gtg, please let there be meaninful posts when I come back. | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
| ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
On May 06 2013 22:06 VayneAuthority wrote: Keep in mind this is night one and not day 2, its pretty much the same thing as day one. The real game starts after PR roles gain info and people get killed. Does this mean we won't your reasons for voting Targe until day two? | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
| ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
On May 07 2013 01:25 Sugarfluff wrote: I realize we will have more information when day 2 begins and those with roles have gathered some info but I thought we could begin early. Even if kirby isn't mafia Calgar seemed to pick his suspicions consciously and I definitely find that suspicious on its own. AllHailHydra seems like a good poster and I can't wait to study his reasoning's, I have to go now but looking forward to the game picking up. Sorry, my post was a little unclear, the second part was at Vayne. I'd like to hear more about your suspicions on Calgar, how are his suspicions picked consciously? How does that make him scum? | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
The one who's bugging me the most is eSpi.Casey. His first few post are just going with the thread flow, agree with stuff and jumping on Vayne when the thread was against him. He states that Vayne is his #2 scumread after giving a light scumread on shirokami just because shiro wasn't posting very much at the start. Casey easily backs off his scumread on shiro when shiro starts to post, but he doesn't vote Vayne, he votes FloWcaster. His posts show that he want to vote for a "safe" target, not a player he has a scumread on. Highlighted in the underlined. On May 06 2013 05:36 eSpi.Casey wrote: Im trying to figure out who i should be voting for, but i find it pretty hard, i still think vayne seem`s scummy, Flowcaster seems to be replaced. I think its to little content to find a good scumread and vote for. Im tempted to vote for Vayne, but if he flip`s town we will have a total caos on day2, i put my vote on Flowcaster for now, i will be reading here before the day ends, and might change my vote from what i read and how the game evolves On May 06 2013 05:50 eSpi.Casey wrote: Casey seems to sail between a JarJar lynch and a Vayne lynch. I also don't like how he belittled himself in the underlined. Town wants people to listen to them so there's no reason to give others reasons to ignore you. But if you are scum, everyone ignoring your posts makes it easier for you to blend in. Its not my final vote, as i said im tempted to vote Vayne , but i want to see how this develops the last hours, while i try read some filters and hopefully be able to place a vote a little more secure then i feel now, would be really bad if Vayne, or someone else turns town, its pretty much chaos now, and D2 would be really bad if we lynch a townnie On May 06 2013 07:37 eSpi.Casey wrote: He sees that a JarJar lynch is coming, and secures the misslynch by voting on him. All he has for night one is a post, where he accuses jrkirby, who was gathering some pressure in the thread, and agrees with HydraGod. If it wasn't already clear, I think eSpi.Casey is scum.##Unvote : Flowcaster ##Vote : JarJarDrinks Jarjar and Vayne seems as the most scumming once for me, with jarjar as the scummiest, jarjar have barly contributed, Vayne says he will contribute, but not before D2, atleast he seems more active then jarjar, im looking forward to see what you come up with on D2 Veyne, if your still here. Tomorrow i have free from work and will spend much time analytic post/filters and try to contribute more then i have done soo far. I think maybe i should have obs`ed a game before i started playing, this was a bit harder then i expected, but il try to keep up. @HydraGod On May 06 2013 03:52 jampidampi wrote: The bolded part was what made me think he is scum. This was his last post at the time. Most of JarJars better posts came after that point, while I was asleep. Townies can tunnel, but they shouldn't ignore everything else that is happening.JarJarDrinks has only tunneled me. Reading a past town game from him, he's perfectly capable of thinking multiple people at the same time, yet here he doesn't do that. JarJar is clinging on to a single thing I said, and doesn't even consider other things I say, not to mention everything everyone else says. As for my take on Sugarfluff, he was a bit wishywashy at the start, but seems to have some decent analysis.I have a pending question for him and his answear might make his alingment a little bit more clear. For now, he is null. Targe on the other hand, is suspicious. He has some good points, but he doesn't draw conclusions. A prime example is his analysis on Vayne, shirokami and Sugarfluff in his list post. On May 06 2013 07:05 Targe wrote: Look at this post. It seems as though he knew JarJar would be lynched and flip town. He leaves a pressure vote as his final vote of the day, later claims that he would have removed it and that there were only two votes on JarJar when he leaved (there where actually four), while wanting Casey and Spicy to change their votes. How do their votes matter if he thinks JarJar will be lynched?Looks like jarjar's eating this lynch, I was hoping the voting would put some pressure on him to explain himself but he hasn't responded, annoying, if he turns out to be town that is a wasted day and a lynch, we'll be giving scum breathing room for another day. Casey and Spicy, you really need to change your votes, flowcaster is pointless as he is about to be modkilled. Calgar, don't switch to flowcaster, that's a terrible idea because of his modkilling. On May 06 2013 15:25 Targe wrote: The bolded seems off. Isn't getting people to post and thus slip up if they are scum the purpose of pressure? Targe also jumps defensive the instant he believes he is accused. I'd say he is scum.ffs I wish I had seen that discussion and hadn't gone to bed, I only wanted to put pressure on jarjar but he posted after I went to sleep. @Vayne I swear I will lynch you if don't deliver with the analysis on day two. Even if this is your normal playstyle, not giving reasoning to the things you say is so god damn antitown it hurts. Making this post took longer than anticipated, so good night, hopefully I'm alive when day two rolls around. | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
| ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
 | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
| ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
 | ||
| ||
|
|
WardiTV European League
PiGosaur Monday
OSC
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
The PondCast
Online Event
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
Online Event
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|
|
EPT
