EPTNewbie Mafia XL
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
/out | ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
its official. | ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
##Vote: TheRavensName | ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On April 05 2013 09:16 Smancer wrote: ##Vote: Rainbows Obviously trying to get town to waste votes on a lurker that will most likely be mod killed at the end of the day. ##Unvote ##Vote: Smancer Not voting Raven. | ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
##Unvote Anyone who's here right now I want to give me their opinions on a statement. --- I don't want to talk about policy. You can policy me this or policy me that, or raise me a lynch-all-liar policy, but I don't want to hear it. Your policy is your own. Enact it when you see fit, if at all. Don't spew it in the thread incessantly to act like you're contributing or it's the 'must-do' in a mafia game. If you want to override this and go on with it, fine with me. Whatever you feel is best. | ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On April 05 2013 09:33 Moloch wrote: I'm fine with you telling everyone why you're doing everything. If you try to implement a policy that you want everyone in the game to follow it exactly, you'll probably get people complaining since not everyone wants the same thing. My point. Keep in mind the following question isn't policy-based. Let's say we have this one guy, super emotional, yelling at people, voting all over the place. Call him guy A. Guy B is cool, suave, making decent points here and there, voting is in line with his thinking. Guy C is hardcore lurking are barely here, but won't get modkilled because he votes. Guy D is kinda wimpy, and sheeps cases but is also hard to read. Who do we lynch? | ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
/trollpost | ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
This vote is serious. | ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On April 05 2013 10:13 jrkirby wrote: ##Vote Rainbows I think he's just trying to jerk us around here and distract us. If he's fat, he doesn't have much info yet and wouldn't make so many wild accusations so quickly. I'll take this as an answer: "Guy A" | ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
Raven!!! All the other shenanigans doesn't matter. How are you? | ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On April 05 2013 11:39 TheRavensName wrote: Not happy actually. I feel pretty sick, today is the first day I've been able to stay up for more then two hours after my classes. I see I see. You scum today? Or just roll dat VT again? | ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On April 05 2013 11:57 Saraf wrote: glhf Can we vote for a no-lynch in this game, or must votes be placed on individuals? Not talking policy Day 1 is bullshit. Scum know who scum are but we don't, and the only way we catch scum is by making them fuck up. Even if the policy ends up being "there is no policy", the debate drives conversation and conversation is the only reliable way we have of rooting out scum and eliminating them. Problems arise for town when scum derails the conversation, so here's some day 1 policy to chew on: In the absence of really strong reads, lynch the spammiest asshole who shits up the thread the most. Spamming the thread is a scum tactic to distract and disrupt town; even if the spammiest asshole is just some poor well-meaning fattie (who should have applied the litmus test "does this post help town?"), at the very least in Day 2 the thread will be less shit up, and it'll be easier to find scum without him shitting up the thread. Y u heff to be mad? Also, scumslip -- you called me town. :p | ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
I'm a super miller/Godfather/jailframer | ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
I think we should all rally around lynching Saraf, because he called me town and expressed interest in lynching someone he called probably town. ##Unvote ##Vote: Saraf The logic here, it is very strong indeed. | ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
| ||
