|
On April 13 2013 01:10 TheRavensName wrote:Show nested quote +On April 13 2013 00:57 Rainbows wrote:On April 13 2013 00:50 Warent wrote:On April 13 2013 00:44 Rainbows wrote:
Yes, bring up all the dead people that voted for JarJar. You killed them, after all. That's a lie. Lynch from day one and day two in spoilers. + Show Spoiler +Day one lynch:
TheRavensname (1) Rainbows
Rainbows (2) Warent, TheRavensName
jrkirby (2) JarJarDrinks, nobodywonder
jampidampi (4) Smancer, Obzy, Fishgle, Moloch
JarJarDrinks (3) Saraf, jrkirby, jampidampi
Day two lynch:
TheRavensname (2) Rainbows, Moloch
Rainbows (2) TheRavensName, Warent
jrkirby (5) JarJarDrinks, nobodywonder, Fishgle, Obzy, Smancer
JarJarDrinks (1) jrkirby I did not Lynch them. And why the hell would I get rid of Saraf if I wanted to lynch you day2? You did not lynch them. Yet you did nothing to prevent their lynch, instead put your vote on me uselessly. I just said you wanted to avoid taking responsibility for your actions, and here you are. Oh, so the exact same thing you did?
I take responsibilit for it. I openly admit I did nothing, because I rage quit and didn't care.
On April 13 2013 01:20 TheRavensName wrote:Show nested quote +On April 13 2013 00:50 JarJarDrinks wrote:On April 13 2013 00:37 Warent wrote:
The only thing against me seems to be: I don't trust Rain. When reading the above posts - is NOT trusting Rain a reason to be lynched for? Yes because he HAS TO BE the vigilante. That's the same point against Raven. Please answer me: how terrible would scum have to be to make that fake claim on day 1? It just would never happen. So you've been focusing on a blue role the entire game. And then who is the other person you focused on? Obzy, another blue. How terrible would scum have to be to claim cop last day with no reasoning other than trolling? Rainbows terrible
You keep bringing up my claim from last game. Totally different. We were WAY ahead and I knew everyone would trust me over whoever else claimed. So I trolled the fuck out of the thread and won the game with unnecesarry risk. Here, either I got SUPER lucky and avoided the one blue that wasn't in the game as scum, or I'm actually blue and my claim is real. I don't think I've ever seen a scum fakeclaim day 1 that wasn't like 30 mins before lynch to get a counterclaim out before they died.
If I was fakeclaiming for that purpose, I woulda picked Doc so we could pick him off the next night.
|
If anyone thinks fakeclaiming vig day 1 is a good scum move, epecially for someone who apparently is decent at scum, lol. If having all of this suspicion on me was a good thing, lol. If Raven is town, lol.
|
On April 13 2013 01:34 Rainbows wrote:
If anyone thinks fakeclaiming vig day 1 is a good scum move, epecially for someone who apparently is decent at scum, lol. If having all of this suspicion on me was a good thing, lol. If Raven is town, lol.
Instead of putting it in spoilers I'll just copy paste it here again.
Motives for the claim from a scum perspective:
Rainbow was set to be Lynched at the time, had he not claimed - he would probably go. If he is scum; fake claiming at that point is one of his best moves. These are the different outcomes:
a) Claiming fails, he get lynched: No difference.
b) There is a real vigi in the game who counter claims - it words against words - rain get lynched and mafia knows who the real Vigilant are.
c) There is a real vigi in the game who counter claims: The counter claimer gets lynched - the real vigil is gone
d) The lynched is stopped, someone else (town) gets lynched and the real vigi shots rainbow. Shot now used on someone who would have been lynched had he not faked claimed. Town loses one, scum loses one, and one power role loses its power.
e) The lynched is stopped, there is no vigi in the game. Rain comes out looking like the good guy.
So why not claim for example medic? On the surface claiming vigi seems to be one of the stupidest fake claims "because he will just get shot" and is thus more likely to be believed. But when looked at more closely it is motivated.
Very good motives to fake claim vigi if you are set to be lynched. None of a-e would be worse for scum than a straight up scum lynch.
To all townies out there: IF you have another possible outcome, enlighten me.
|
That's a terrible scum move dude. A real vigi wouldn't counterclaim and just SHOOT me.
I also wasn't that much in danger of being lynched; I could have turned it around if I wasn't so god-forsakenly pissed off. Fakeclaims are ones that are like 1-2 hours before the lynch to get an emotional swing from town or a counterclaim out.
|
TOWN
Lynch Warent or Raven. That is all.
|
On April 13 2013 01:39 Rainbows wrote:
That's a terrible scum move dude. A real vigi wouldn't counterclaim and just SHOOT me.
I also wasn't that much in danger of being lynched; I could have turned it around if I wasn't so god-forsakenly pissed off. Fakeclaims are ones that are like 1-2 hours before the lynch to get an emotional swing from town or a counterclaim out.
Outcome D
d) The lynched is stopped, someone else (town) gets lynched and the real vigi shots rainbow. Shot now used on someone who would have been lynched had he not faked claimed. Town loses one, scum loses one, and one power role loses its power.
|
##Lynch Rainbow
Well, we need the rest of you guys to speak up.
|
|
|
b and c wouldnt happen.
Either way fakeclaiming day 1 is too risky and dumb as scum. I don't think my teamates would allow it haha.
|
FISHGLE, SMANCER, MOLOCH, NW, JJD --- WHICHEVER ONES ARE TOWN VOTE WARENT
|
On April 13 2013 01:47 Rainbows wrote:
FISHGLE, SMANCER, MOLOCH, NW, JJD --- WHICHEVER ONES ARE TOWN VOTE WARENT
My vote's been on him a while dude. Hopefully some of these other guys show up soon.
|
On April 13 2013 01:47 Rainbows wrote:
b and c wouldnt happen.
Either way fakeclaiming day 1 is too risky and dumb as scum. I don't think my teamates would allow it haha.
Just to pour gas on the fire your pissing on to put out: ray and the coach didn't want you to do it last game. You can't claim its different cause you were just teolling when most of day 1 sans rage
quit was trolling for you
|
|
|
smancer fishgle moloch.. get on warent.
i need at least 3 other townies onbhim
|
On April 13 2013 05:28 phagga wrote:
Man, even our host is getting lazy.
|
On April 13 2013 06:00 TheRavensName wrote:Man, even our host is getting lazy.
I don't know what you are talking about. Not at all. Never knew.
|
On April 13 2013 05:42 Rainbows wrote:
smancer fishgle moloch.. get on warent.
i need at least 3 other townies onbhim
Fact: If you don't vote for Rainbows, the communist will win. (Also hes not a real Vigi.)
|
I still think no lynch is the best way to go today. The only reasonable argument against it that I've seen is JJD's about the chance we'll hit the roleblockers.
|
On April 13 2013 06:06 Moloch wrote:
I still think no lynch is the best way to go today. The only reasonable argument against it that I've seen is JJD's about the chance we'll hit the roleblockers.
What about the fact that theres only one person who cast the deciding vote as opposed to two?
|
Game ends today. Sick of this. It's two scum versus me, the other will switch over soon. I wish i had some scumbuddies that would miraculously appear and give me +2 votes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
