|
On April 29 2013 10:05 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
How do you know you are sane? You could be paranoid or insane, correct?
Granted I'd love to kill me a BC...
yes, I could be both paranoid or insane, I could also be mafia.
hell I claimed cop once as mafia with an innocent check on a townie and a guilty check on another townie who flipped during the night, explained that I must be an insane cop so the innocent townie must in fact be scum.
the innocent townie was a pgo, so I wouldn't have been able to visit him anyway, he still got lynched cause lulz.
|
god damn it i was going to post tonight, i wasn't around the entire weekend ==;;
|
On April 29 2013 10:06 Ace wrote:
is that a real claim palmar. lol @ cc. he got rb'd N1. read plz.
yah real.
|
that isnt an actual explanation Palmar
|
HAHA oh man. This is awesome. Except which cop are you? I'm going to assume alignment since you wouldn't have a parity check yet since you were blocked N1. Now if you're alignment cop a guilty check doesn't mean shit yet since you could be any sanity.
Man I wish I could believe you though since I have a hard time believing we'd have more than two millers on town just in case he tried to claim. Wat do?
|
well it's true, take it for what you want
|
Palmar I just have to say your check doesn't mean shit until you get another check... =\
|
On April 29 2013 10:09 WaveofShadow wrote:
HAHA oh man. This is awesome. Except which cop are you? I'm going to assume alignment since you wouldn't have a parity check yet since you were blocked N1. Now if you're alignment cop a guilty check doesn't mean shit yet since you could be any sanity.
Man I wish I could believe you though since I have a hard time believing we'd have more than two millers on town just in case he tried to claim. Wat do?
I'm professor trelawney, who was known to be perfectly sane and such.
|
On April 29 2013 10:10 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Palmar I just have to say your check doesn't mean shit until you get another check... =\
or until we flip the cobbler.
|
On April 29 2013 10:10 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Palmar I just have to say your check doesn't mean shit until you get another check... =\
would you really miss him that much?
|
its fake. If you knew Oats was innocent you'd be more interested to stop the lynch on him, especially if you believe someone else, like say yamato was scummier. You also appear on Oats' wagon twice - if you knew he was innocent you wouldnt even have voted.
If you get a guilty result on BC with only 1 check, with no way to confirm sanity you're just hoping we're all dumb enough to buy it at face value. Fake claim + your day 1 actions dont match.
## vote Palmar
|
On April 29 2013 10:13 Ace wrote:
its fake. If you knew Oats was innocent you'd be more interested to stop the lynch on him, especially if you believe someone else, like say yamato was scummier. You also appear on Oats' wagon twice - if you knew he was innocent you wouldnt even have voted.
If you get a guilty result on BC with only 1 check, with no way to confirm sanity you're just hoping we're all dumb enough to buy it at face value. Fake claim + your day 1 actions dont match.
## vote Palmar
okay, you're bad and should feel bad.
|
Palmar honestly, wtf. What is your goal here? Do you honestly expect people to follow along with you when you riled everyone up and promised some epic war with epic words and arguments, and then deliver this?
It's like we just had sex for the first time and I left disappointed because you only lasted 8 seconds.
|
On April 29 2013 10:10 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2013 10:09 WaveofShadow wrote:
HAHA oh man. This is awesome. Except which cop are you? I'm going to assume alignment since you wouldn't have a parity check yet since you were blocked N1. Now if you're alignment cop a guilty check doesn't mean shit yet since you could be any sanity.
Man I wish I could believe you though since I have a hard time believing we'd have more than two millers on town just in case he tried to claim. Wat do? I'm professor trelawney, who was known to be perfectly sane and such.
Question, did you crumb?
|
On April 29 2013 10:15 WaveofShadow wrote:
Palmar honestly, wtf. What is your goal here? Do you honestly expect people to follow along with you when you riled everyone up and promised some epic war with epic words and arguments, and then deliver this?
It's like we just had sex for the first time and I left disappointed because you only lasted 8 seconds.
This happens often. WoS has poor choice in men.
|
On April 29 2013 10:15 TheRavensName wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2013 10:10 Palmar wrote:On April 29 2013 10:09 WaveofShadow wrote:
HAHA oh man. This is awesome. Except which cop are you? I'm going to assume alignment since you wouldn't have a parity check yet since you were blocked N1. Now if you're alignment cop a guilty check doesn't mean shit yet since you could be any sanity.
Man I wish I could believe you though since I have a hard time believing we'd have more than two millers on town just in case he tried to claim. Wat do? I'm professor trelawney, who was known to be perfectly sane and such. Question, did you crumb?
never have, never will
|
On April 29 2013 10:14 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2013 10:13 Ace wrote:
its fake. If you knew Oats was innocent you'd be more interested to stop the lynch on him, especially if you believe someone else, like say yamato was scummier. You also appear on Oats' wagon twice - if you knew he was innocent you wouldnt even have voted.
If you get a guilty result on BC with only 1 check, with no way to confirm sanity you're just hoping we're all dumb enough to buy it at face value. Fake claim + your day 1 actions dont match.
## vote Palmar
okay, you're bad and should feel bad.
you're a cop, had got masoned, didn't post in the mason QT and didn't even think to investigate the guy you were masoned with? if you didnt trust him enough to post in the QT then where is the sense in checking BC out? explain.
|
On April 29 2013 10:15 WaveofShadow wrote:
Palmar honestly, wtf. What is your goal here? Do you honestly expect people to follow along with you when you riled everyone up and promised some epic war with epic words and arguments, and then deliver this?
It's like we just had sex for the first time and I left disappointed because you only lasted 8 seconds.
yeah sorry, but I just cba.
I actually had a half-edited declaration of war on bloodycobbler in a notepad, but really just don't have the energy to argue with everyone.
|
On April 29 2013 10:17 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2013 10:14 Palmar wrote:On April 29 2013 10:13 Ace wrote:
its fake. If you knew Oats was innocent you'd be more interested to stop the lynch on him, especially if you believe someone else, like say yamato was scummier. You also appear on Oats' wagon twice - if you knew he was innocent you wouldnt even have voted.
If you get a guilty result on BC with only 1 check, with no way to confirm sanity you're just hoping we're all dumb enough to buy it at face value. Fake claim + your day 1 actions dont match.
## vote Palmar
okay, you're bad and should feel bad. you're a cop, had got masoned, didn't post in the mason QT and didn't even think to investigate the guy you were masoned with? if you didnt trust him enough to post in the QT then where is the sense in checking BC out? explain.
I'm a cop
Got masoned
Got bored of the mason QT
Didn't see the reason to investigate him, he looked somewhat town, yet not confirmed enough for me to outright claim.
I trusted him well enough to post in the QT, I just didn't.
|
as in, I would have posted reads and everything, but kept my role back.
the closest thing I left as a crumb is the "reasons best left unexplained" about my apathy towards the oats lynch. Who I thought was pretty likely to flip town by the end of the day (my early suspicions on him were genuine).
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
