EPTTL Mafia LXI - Page 104
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On April 27 2013 03:04 Stutters695 wrote: That's the exact same thing he did with hammering Oats btw. Since you are here. Can you give me an outline of your thoughts. Reads, reasons for the, etc... You have an extremely small filter and given that your final should be done now you should have a bit of time to do the thread this small gesture. | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9647 Posts
VisceraEyes (3): Palmar, Kushm4sta (1) Bill Murray GiygaS (2): grush57, getmoript Palmar (1): VisceraEyes ShiaoPi (4): Clarity_nl (5): Sharrant, Ace, Stutters695 (0): Ace (0): yamato77 (1): BloodyCobbler Remember, this Day ends when a majority is reached. As soon as a majority is reached, please stop posting until the Night Post has been posted. Only votes in the voting thread will be counted! The voting thread can be found here: (link) With 23 alive it takes 12 votes to lynch. | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
On April 27 2013 03:09 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Why don't you discuss any of the other potential scum candidates, why didnt you make a solid post about why you think VE is scum or clarity is scum? If you have time to read, and know you are going to be inactive it seems the logical move as a townie would be to post why you are doing x to avoid being called out on it. Instead you don't do that. Instead you jump in, vote, and attempt to flee instantly. I did not discuss them as incidentally my strongest reads are on VE and on Clarity right now. I have a lingering suspicion on Gigays which is weakening to stupid townie currently and I am wary of Stutters, but that is more due to the fact that he replaced in and has not done much yet. Weak argument but he did replace DrH who is usually a very vocal person. As you seem to disagree with the way I am playing, I just want to say that I am posting about why I a mdoing what, probably not to the satisfaction of most people in the thread when I glance eat the voting thread but that is just the way I do it now. Looks to you like jumping in dropping and vote and running off i guess, but truth is, it is late, I am tired, I do still want to play this game so I am allocating time I could use for sleep to this game in order to not only save towm from a potential mislynch but also to push what i believe to be scum. You can read that as you want it, but at least to me it is definetyl not fleeing, heck I am here answering to you | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On April 27 2013 03:19 ShiaoPi wrote: I did not discuss them as incidentally my strongest reads are on VE and on Clarity right now. I have a lingering suspicion on Gigays which is weakening to stupid townie currently and I am wary of Stutters, but that is more due to the fact that he replaced in and has not done much yet. Weak argument but he did replace DrH who is usually a very vocal person. As you seem to disagree with the way I am playing, I just want to say that I am posting about why I a mdoing what, probably not to the satisfaction of most people in the thread when I glance eat the voting thread but that is just the way I do it now. Looks to you like jumping in dropping and vote and running off i guess, but truth is, it is late, I am tired, I do still want to play this game so I am allocating time I could use for sleep to this game in order to not only save towm from a potential mislynch but also to push what i believe to be scum. You can read that as you want it, but at least to me it is definetyl not fleeing, heck I am here answering to you That you are which is some points in your favour. You understand where i am coming from though? That I had to pressure you to get information that you should have presented in the first post? I will let you get sleep but I do expect more from you than sheeping players because "they are good" especially when said players are not doing that much | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
On April 27 2013 03:09 raynpelikoneet wrote: Actually one more question: What are the points you find good against VE that has been brought up? weird assumptoion of his that palamar is scum which isdirectly contrary to mine and i have no clue where this comes from if not trying to discredit a vet. also day1 behavior and in general that feel that he is not doing as much as he seemingly usually does. would dig up more if i wouldnt be so tired, more questions? | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On April 27 2013 03:34 raynpelikoneet wrote: Hopeless who is your preferred lynch today? tbh Sharrant until someone can explain how he gets away from his scumread on you, as evidenced from On April 22 2013 13:26 Sharrant wrote: --SNIP-- At this point I am less sure about Rayn being scum than I was then, because his conversations with other players has generally been good since that time, but he's still in my top 3 to lynch. I just haven't decided if there's someone I'd rather lynch more, like say Hopeless. Any more questions? On April 23 2013 00:02 Sharrant wrote: It's a good try, Rayne, but no. Let's get this out of the way quickly because I have to leave, and there's more important things to do when I'm back. The reason I looked into you is because of your chainsaw defense of TRN. That fit exactly what I was looking for, so I went through your filter. I am not trying to lynch you on the merit of you defending TRN, get that through your head. I am going to get you lynched because you are scum. You claim that after posting several times about how miller claims should be a policy lynch, you say that it's not a policy lynch you're pushing on BM. The closest you come to make to a case is "This isn't a miller lynch policy, I'm lynching him because he claimed miller which is scummy" which is exactly the same as saying "No, this isn't a lurker lynch, I'm just lynching because his low activity is scummy". It's just attempting to disguise that you were trying to policy lynch him. The post I voted for you details exactly why I have you as a scum read. The possibility that you were a townie who made some crazy defense on TRN went out the window when I read through your filter. If you can't understand that, I can't help you. Those important things, like not lynching your primary scumread? He doesnt return to 'get things done" until Oats is lynched. Clarity's spiel about 'easy outs' doesnt look that stupid to me considering how Sharrant's read on rayn went into the abyss with no comment at all. He just dropped his read with no explanation that I can find. What gives? There's also what I view as feigned contribution. I realize he's posted way more than I have, but when you post On April 25 2013 01:29 Sharrant wrote: Is there anyone around who feels like chatting? I don't want to put up any large posts until it's just about daybreak (which I think is in about 2 and a half hours if someone could confirm). and then don't drop a wall of text in some regard, it looks like faked activity to me. This is also his first post after insisting he has shit to do upon his return, but I cant find these amazing things he's done. He's focused his attention towards clarity, but clarity barely existed at this point. Where are these "better things" sharrant promised? ##Vote: Sharrant | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
What do you think of Sylencia / WoS? | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
What's up, guy? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
I'm willing to lynch Shiao or Palmar today. These are the only lynches I'm willing to discuss. Anyone else can wait until tomorrow. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
Of the people who seem lynchable today: VE: I really don't see how VE is doing anything lynchable that ShiaoPi isn't doing worse. I disagree with his reads, but I'm not seeing the "lazy" VE that Palmar is mentioning. At least not to the extent that he should be lynched over some of these other people. ShiaoPi: Pretty much the only thing I've said in my few posts. Easily my choice for a lynch currently. When I was catching up before joining I noticed similar things to VE and Vivax on that. He hammered a town player (would be understandable if he had expressed any interest before that) and has actively been avoiding major topics. Clarity-nl: TBH he doesn't seem as bad as others are making him sound but I need to go over his stuff in context of the thread. Again I see questionable stuff but nothing that comes close to what i see as shady about Shiao. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On April 27 2013 04:02 WaveofShadow wrote: Uh, so stutters, I appreciate a ninjavote on my scumread as much as the next person, but for a guy who professes to find someone scummy for not interacting with their scumread, you're certainly looking mighty hypocritical right now. What's up, guy? Was typing out a response and I thought I made it pretty clear here + Show Spoiler + On April 26 2013 07:34 Stutters695 wrote: VE:I thought between the Vivax case and your points that the case on Shiao was pretty good. What specifically made you switch to Palmar over Shiao? I can understand why Palmar's posting is like he is, but Shiao has hammered oats when he hadn't interacted or even mentioned him all game with a very weak justification (Oats wasn't doing shit so why not hammer him for info [which he never brought up again]). I'm just not following what made you so sold on Palmar over him. | ||
|
getmoript
1016 Posts
Vote shiao | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
##Vote: ShiaoPi | ||
| ||
