|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On March 13 2013 01:12 supersoft wrote:
i should have hyped yamato as super-townie for that shot and hoped that if he's town, he could be like a shield for for me and if he doesnt die, he's scum - i wonder if this could have worked...
now we have to deal with him and the scumteam wont do us the favor to shoot him...
Vivax point is actually not that bad... "end the kurumi problem"
while kurumi already said he has a "scumrole".... it was uncertain if a redcheck would have helped us much...
solving = killing.
GF snipe? not really since he wouldnt have died if he really were gf...
ahhh whatever...
i believe yam. is just playing against our wincondition... but thats okay. i dont expect much more...
I don't really agree, I'd have voted for the redcheck no problem.
|
uah, i dont know... kurumi had no motivation as real scum to post and suicide like this.
|
we probably would have killed him - yes. But the problem would have been still there...
|
|
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
The Kurumi problem wouldn't be there, which is the problem yamato said he would solve.
yamato would still be there, yes, but that's a different kettle of fish.
|
On March 13 2013 01:17 marvellosity wrote:
The Kurumi problem wouldn't be there, which is the problem yamato said he would solve.
yamato would still be there, yes, but that's a different kettle of fish.
The problem he said he would "solve" before knowing from the host if Kurumi was scum or town?
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On March 13 2013 01:18 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 01:17 marvellosity wrote:
The Kurumi problem wouldn't be there, which is the problem yamato said he would solve.
yamato would still be there, yes, but that's a different kettle of fish. The problem he said he would "solve" before knowing from the host if Kurumi was scum or town?
if he's scum we lynch him, if he's a martyring town, he gets shot.
Problem solved in both scenarios?
|
|
|
On March 13 2013 01:19 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 01:18 Vivax wrote:On March 13 2013 01:17 marvellosity wrote:
The Kurumi problem wouldn't be there, which is the problem yamato said he would solve.
yamato would still be there, yes, but that's a different kettle of fish. The problem he said he would "solve" before knowing from the host if Kurumi was scum or town? if he's scum we lynch him, if he's a martyring town, he gets shot. Problem solved in both scenarios?
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
On March 11 2013 06:46 Kurumi wrote:
okay so it seems I got a scum role and I am town
burn me because if I ever fucking turn mole I will throw something heavy out of my room
##vote Kurumi
On March 11 2013 06:59 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 05:59 cDgCorazon wrote:
Hmmm...guess who has decided to lurk now that other targets are being hunted? Yamato and Acro...
##Vote: Yamato
Gonna start scumhunting? i'm at work you asshat it's in my filter What I will do is solve this Kurumi problem right now.
He chose to shoot Kurumi for martyring over his "scumread" VE in the arc of 13 minutes.
On March 12 2013 11:31 yamato77 wrote:
I consent to any of Vivax, Super, Bugs, Foolish or Ver hanging
My vote will stay where it is because I only have time to type this post at work.
If I die, so be it, but I highly doubt you guys will be happy when you find out I lied about nothing
Bugs was martyring, too but he pumps out a 5 guy list instead of going for Bugs who does the same as Kurumi. Kurumi martyring is a good enough reason to shoot him but Bugs doing that isn't a good enough reason to lynch him over 4 others?
Inconsistent reasons, terrible role usage, indications of him knowing Kurumi's flip beforehand ( + general subjective scumminess).
|
lets agree it was a terrible move and we move on.
|
On March 13 2013 01:32 supersoft wrote:
lets agree it was a terrible move and we move on.
we overdiscussed this incident and we have better targets for tomorrow
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
vigilante shots are for shooting detritus who might turn up mafia, not a random suspicion you haven't fleshed out yet. town-yamato or town-anyone wouldn't shoot at VE just because they happen to think he's suspicious at that point, not a chance.
his lack of a vote on any leading candidate towards the end is odd, if only because there was a serious chance he might actually get lynched at the time. bugs was behaving differently to Kurumi though; Kurumi was actively begging ppl to vote him, bugs told me i was a moron for voting him before just giving up.
|
There's a difference in how Bugs was martyring and how Kurumi did it. Kurumi was town and a fucking grabbag of scum powers scum would salivate over. We don't know if there are alignment swapping mechanics in the roles, or if someone is a mole, or anything...but Kurumi didn't want to take that chance. So he called for his own death.
Bugs was a third party who decided that roleplaying isn't fun enough to offset how boring and hard it is to keep from getting lynched, so he just threw his arms up and gave the fuck up.
There's a marked difference between the two scenarios.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
ninjad you hard, VE 
|
|
|
On March 12 2013 23:14 austinmcc wrote:Okay, read through what I've missed once. WHAT IS GOING ON!? I am not mayor. Boo. Vivax and marv are shitting up the thread. Boo. Vivax, you looked bad yesterday, but in a way that made me feel townie on you. I'm used to seeing you take crap on D1 as town, and it reminded me of games where that's happened. But all this crap with you and foolishness and marv is ridiculous. I'm going to throw away the bit where you didn't read posts, apparently, but made reads anyway. The part where you did not read posts, from a guy who doesn't have a lot of posts, but made reads anyway. One more time. The part of your read on Foolishness, the guy who hasn't been tremendously active, where you based your read on what you thought his posts might have said, but who cares because you don't need to read them.Instead, what is this? Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 22:52 Vivax wrote:
Well I think Foolish' initial post was a way of fishing for reactions since I'm subject to mislynches and scum pushing me and townies failing to read me, he had basically given zero reasoning for doing what he did and it lured two suspicious sheeps:
VE and Oats quickly. Within the last 5-10 pages, you (see above) based your read on Foolishness off what you thought his posts might have said. And now you're doing the same friggin thing. "I think Foolishness's initial post was this" when Foolishness said Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 16:13 Foolishness wrote:
I was gone and made an accusation based on what I skimmed through the thread at the time. Then when I came back to push the case further I realized I was wrong when I analyzed him. Which should be obvious given that I gave the proof. Foolishness - "I skimmed the thread and made an accusation that I realized was wrong when I went back and looked."
Vivax - "I think Foolishness was trying to fish for reactions and he caught these two people."
You always look scummy, but this is just straight out making stuff up and not listening to reason when you're clearly wrong. I remember you playing/looking scummy as town, but not outright just doing stuff like this. Stuck believing that this is real scumminess from you, and not the way you look as town.Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 22:57 Vivax wrote:
It's pretty scummy you are willing to risk one of the strongest town players to get NKd without even knowing what yamato's or my alignment is (and thus the validity of Foolishness' reads). This is crap. In Bureaucracy, Foolishness was afk for a while, got crap for not making any cases or doing anything, came back and made a big case on Bill Murray, and throughout his time alive added some minor suspicions on BH and Palmar. BH and Palmar were both mafia, BM wasn't. Also, Foolishness was mafia. Basically, out of his mafia reads, 2/3 were right, and he was the head of the whole mafia. His alignment should absolutely not be predicated on whether his reads are good or not.
Quoted because it's important, bolded for emphasis.
|
On March 13 2013 00:45 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 00:09 marvellosity wrote:
Anyway, I'm going to stop thinking about Foolishness and Vivax entirely for now because it's not helping me.
I had a random thought while smoking. If iamp as town is usually almost like an IC, why has he changed up his style so much this game just to roleplay? Is it worth it? did anyone have any thoughts about this?
the games i played with him were months ago granted, but i didn't have that impression from town iamperfection
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On March 13 2013 01:46 strongandbig wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 00:45 marvellosity wrote:On March 13 2013 00:09 marvellosity wrote:
Anyway, I'm going to stop thinking about Foolishness and Vivax entirely for now because it's not helping me.
I had a random thought while smoking. If iamp as town is usually almost like an IC, why has he changed up his style so much this game just to roleplay? Is it worth it? did anyone have any thoughts about this? the games i played with him were months ago granted, but i didn't have that impression from town iamperfection
I wasn't asking for your opinion on a premise i'm already taking to be true, dearest.
|
I don't know what an IC is 
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
