|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 15 2013 00:44 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2013 00:43 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:41 yamato77 wrote:On March 15 2013 00:39 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:38 yamato77 wrote:
Marv, I really don't want you to spend your limited time picking apart arguments from Foolishness. Get a grip, it's the most important thing to do in the thread. I'm exposing Foolishness, and you need to read the post to understand that. I read the post already. I already know he lied about meta, I'm not an idiot. It's really not worthwhile to convince people you think he's mafia. Either they believe him or not, you won't change the minds of people like oats/vivax/corazon by refuting him point-by-point. yes, of course i will. I need to show the thread that everything Foolishness says is twisted. The point is everyone is going "oh wow that long post looks fucking awesome!" and I'm just picking it apart, lie by lie, bullshit by bullshit. The thread needs to see that making a massive post doesn't mean town. Now leave me alone. He's still the leading vote-getter by far, dude. You don't need to push his lynch, it's already happening. Why not talk about something else that is more useful? You've been on this Foolish bullshit all day basically. Give it a rest.
fuck off, yamato.
|
On March 15 2013 00:44 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2013 00:43 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:41 yamato77 wrote:On March 15 2013 00:39 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:38 yamato77 wrote:
Marv, I really don't want you to spend your limited time picking apart arguments from Foolishness. Get a grip, it's the most important thing to do in the thread. I'm exposing Foolishness, and you need to read the post to understand that. I read the post already. I already know he lied about meta, I'm not an idiot. It's really not worthwhile to convince people you think he's mafia. Either they believe him or not, you won't change the minds of people like oats/vivax/corazon by refuting him point-by-point. yes, of course i will. I need to show the thread that everything Foolishness says is twisted. The point is everyone is going "oh wow that long post looks fucking awesome!" and I'm just picking it apart, lie by lie, bullshit by bullshit. The thread needs to see that making a massive post doesn't mean town. Now leave me alone. He's still the leading vote-getter by far, dude. You don't need to push his lynch, it's already happening. Why not talk about something else that is more useful? You've been on this Foolish bullshit all day basically. Give it a rest.
You do see that your posts are equally (or even more) useless, yes?
|
11589 Posts
On March 15 2013 00:45 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2013 00:44 yamato77 wrote:On March 15 2013 00:43 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:41 yamato77 wrote:On March 15 2013 00:39 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:38 yamato77 wrote:
Marv, I really don't want you to spend your limited time picking apart arguments from Foolishness. Get a grip, it's the most important thing to do in the thread. I'm exposing Foolishness, and you need to read the post to understand that. I read the post already. I already know he lied about meta, I'm not an idiot. It's really not worthwhile to convince people you think he's mafia. Either they believe him or not, you won't change the minds of people like oats/vivax/corazon by refuting him point-by-point. yes, of course i will. I need to show the thread that everything Foolishness says is twisted. The point is everyone is going "oh wow that long post looks fucking awesome!" and I'm just picking it apart, lie by lie, bullshit by bullshit. The thread needs to see that making a massive post doesn't mean town. Now leave me alone. He's still the leading vote-getter by far, dude. You don't need to push his lynch, it's already happening. Why not talk about something else that is more useful? You've been on this Foolish bullshit all day basically. Give it a rest. fuck off, yamato.
It's not useful anymore to do what you're doing.
You're not stupid, Marv. You can get mad at me or whatever, but I think you know he's dead in the water already.
|
So vivax. Why are you answering questions for oats? Oats are you calling yamato scum?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 15 2013 00:46 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2013 00:45 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:44 yamato77 wrote:On March 15 2013 00:43 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:41 yamato77 wrote:On March 15 2013 00:39 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:38 yamato77 wrote:
Marv, I really don't want you to spend your limited time picking apart arguments from Foolishness. Get a grip, it's the most important thing to do in the thread. I'm exposing Foolishness, and you need to read the post to understand that. I read the post already. I already know he lied about meta, I'm not an idiot. It's really not worthwhile to convince people you think he's mafia. Either they believe him or not, you won't change the minds of people like oats/vivax/corazon by refuting him point-by-point. yes, of course i will. I need to show the thread that everything Foolishness says is twisted. The point is everyone is going "oh wow that long post looks fucking awesome!" and I'm just picking it apart, lie by lie, bullshit by bullshit. The thread needs to see that making a massive post doesn't mean town. Now leave me alone. He's still the leading vote-getter by far, dude. You don't need to push his lynch, it's already happening. Why not talk about something else that is more useful? You've been on this Foolish bullshit all day basically. Give it a rest. fuck off, yamato. It's not useful anymore to do what you're doing. You're not stupid, Marv. You can get mad at me or whatever, but I think you know he's dead in the water already.
it is useful, because there's still a bunch of Foolishness fanboys, not all of which are mafia. Don't ever tell me how to play again, please.
|
11589 Posts
On March 15 2013 00:45 Dandel Ion wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2013 00:44 yamato77 wrote:On March 15 2013 00:43 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:41 yamato77 wrote:On March 15 2013 00:39 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:38 yamato77 wrote:
Marv, I really don't want you to spend your limited time picking apart arguments from Foolishness. Get a grip, it's the most important thing to do in the thread. I'm exposing Foolishness, and you need to read the post to understand that. I read the post already. I already know he lied about meta, I'm not an idiot. It's really not worthwhile to convince people you think he's mafia. Either they believe him or not, you won't change the minds of people like oats/vivax/corazon by refuting him point-by-point. yes, of course i will. I need to show the thread that everything Foolishness says is twisted. The point is everyone is going "oh wow that long post looks fucking awesome!" and I'm just picking it apart, lie by lie, bullshit by bullshit. The thread needs to see that making a massive post doesn't mean town. Now leave me alone. He's still the leading vote-getter by far, dude. You don't need to push his lynch, it's already happening. Why not talk about something else that is more useful? You've been on this Foolish bullshit all day basically. Give it a rest. You do see that your posts are equally (or even more) useless, yes?
And what stunning analysis have you given today?
I'm trying to get Marv to stop playing so anti-town with this Foolish tunnel.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
it's not anti-town, it was one extremely well written and consolidated post.
In fact, you telling me off about posting it has spanned 20 posts as opposed to the one post I made.
|
On March 15 2013 00:47 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2013 00:45 Dandel Ion wrote:On March 15 2013 00:44 yamato77 wrote:On March 15 2013 00:43 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:41 yamato77 wrote:On March 15 2013 00:39 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:38 yamato77 wrote:
Marv, I really don't want you to spend your limited time picking apart arguments from Foolishness. Get a grip, it's the most important thing to do in the thread. I'm exposing Foolishness, and you need to read the post to understand that. I read the post already. I already know he lied about meta, I'm not an idiot. It's really not worthwhile to convince people you think he's mafia. Either they believe him or not, you won't change the minds of people like oats/vivax/corazon by refuting him point-by-point. yes, of course i will. I need to show the thread that everything Foolishness says is twisted. The point is everyone is going "oh wow that long post looks fucking awesome!" and I'm just picking it apart, lie by lie, bullshit by bullshit. The thread needs to see that making a massive post doesn't mean town. Now leave me alone. He's still the leading vote-getter by far, dude. You don't need to push his lynch, it's already happening. Why not talk about something else that is more useful? You've been on this Foolish bullshit all day basically. Give it a rest. You do see that your posts are equally (or even more) useless, yes? And what stunning analysis have you given today? I'm trying to get Marv to stop playing so anti-town with this Foolish tunnel.
Very stunning one, actually.
Have you ever given any at all?
|
On March 15 2013 00:34 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2013 00:20 yamato77 wrote:
Austin, what's your read on risk.nuke? I won't claim to have a magical meta-activity-read on risk, and that seems to be what most reads on him are based on? He's in the group I'm concerned with. I don't like that he's still there. I'll skip a discussion of the bits of his filter that I can't figure out - his pushing non-majority targets D1 (scum being present but not really interacting with the thread or actual hunting of interesting targets), Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 18:53 risk.nuke wrote:
Foolishness just pulled a stunt, I'll revaluate based on how that goes. Before that I would porbably had been fine lynching him based on his performance. This quote worries me. I didn't remember this until filtering just now. I don't THINK foolishness claimed his nuke to be a stunt. This was before slOosh spoke on the nukes, before Crossfire launched his nuke. But risk seems to know that the nuke that Foolish launched was a "stunt." It's...gah. Foolishness didn't know the nuke was fake at this point, unless EVERYONE is scum, so it...it isn't incriminating? It really isn't scummy unless risk and slOosh were both scum, because only then could risk know that the nuke was a "stunt" and not a real nuke? Blech, not as important as I thought. The ONLY thing in his filter that really gives me a whiff of anything is him picking up on Foolishness's role feeling like crap. That makes me mildly townie on him. It puts him above prplhz, hiropro, possibly strongandbig in the group of players that I keep lumping together. risk's filter is going to look a LOT more informative with a couple flips though. His D1 targets and his "reevaluation" of his non-Foolishness lynches for today seem like they could be telling once we fill in other holes. If you can find more in his filter to read him off of, be my guest. But there's very little in there that's doing anything for me one way or the other, barring not trusting Foolishness's claim.
When I said stunt I didn't mean I knew the nuke would be fake. I ment that Foolishness just did something drastic.
I might aswell add I also received a nuke this night. I'm sure some already suspected that from how I spoke about them.
I decided not to use mine untill the deadline at earliest. When Sloosh posted his post about things being cleared up in at midday, the same deadline for sending nukes today I suspected a connection. And when several people started launching nukes I knew at least all weren't real or that they in some way was conditional.
|
Is there a situation that both Foolishness and Marv are town and that we need to look elsewhere?
Like, YAMATO!!!!
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 15 2013 00:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
Is there a situation that both Foolishness and Marv are town and that we need to look elsewhere?
Like, YAMATO!!!!
if you actually read my post, it should be pretty clear already that Foolishness isn't town
|
On March 15 2013 00:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
Is there a situation that both Foolishness and Marv are town and that we need to look elsewhere?
Like, YAMATO!!!!
Shitposting like he does right now is not really all that alignment indicative...
|
On March 15 2013 00:53 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2013 00:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
Is there a situation that both Foolishness and Marv are town and that we need to look elsewhere?
Like, YAMATO!!!!
if you actually read my post, it should be pretty clear already that Foolishness isn't town
You are wrong on occasion.
I just dont think Fool is scum, and I dont think Marv is scum.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 15 2013 00:56 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2013 00:53 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
Is there a situation that both Foolishness and Marv are town and that we need to look elsewhere?
Like, YAMATO!!!!
if you actually read my post, it should be pretty clear already that Foolishness isn't town You are wrong on occasion. I just dont think Fool is scum, and I dont think Marv is scum.
You know I like you a lot, so in the nicest way possible - I'm much more likely to be right than you, and you know that.
|
I honestly think that there's less of a chance they're both town than there is of them both being mafia. As in, there's an outside chance both are mafia, and an outside outside outside outside chance they're both town.
Each is spending a majority of his focus on the other. Makes it look less suspicious that neither is taking control over town in a bunch of aspects and directing things, because they're really just focused on this one guy, and when that one guy flips scum, ta da! All the effort worth it. More focus on a singular targets just helps duck a policy lynch later on, imo.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 15 2013 00:58 austinmcc wrote:
I honestly think that there's less of a chance they're both town than there is of them both being mafia. As in, there's an outside chance both are mafia, and an outside outside outside outside chance they're both town.
Each is spending a majority of his focus on the other. Makes it look less suspicious that neither is taking control over town in a bunch of aspects and directing things, because they're really just focused on this one guy, and when that one guy flips scum, ta da! All the effort worth it. More focus on a singular targets just helps duck a policy lynch later on, imo.
You do realise that I wanted to lynch Corazon earlier in the day before Hiro prodded me back towards Foolish, right? 
|
11589 Posts
On March 15 2013 00:58 austinmcc wrote:
I honestly think that there's less of a chance they're both town than there is of them both being mafia. As in, there's an outside chance both are mafia, and an outside outside outside outside chance they're both town.
Each is spending a majority of his focus on the other. Makes it look less suspicious that neither is taking control over town in a bunch of aspects and directing things, because they're really just focused on this one guy, and when that one guy flips scum, ta da! All the effort worth it. More focus on a singular targets just helps duck a policy lynch later on, imo.
Austin hits the nail on the proverbial head.
|
On March 15 2013 00:59 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2013 00:58 austinmcc wrote:
I honestly think that there's less of a chance they're both town than there is of them both being mafia. As in, there's an outside chance both are mafia, and an outside outside outside outside chance they're both town.
Each is spending a majority of his focus on the other. Makes it look less suspicious that neither is taking control over town in a bunch of aspects and directing things, because they're really just focused on this one guy, and when that one guy flips scum, ta da! All the effort worth it. More focus on a singular targets just helps duck a policy lynch later on, imo. You do realise that I wanted to lynch Corazon earlier in the day before Hiro prodded me back towards Foolish, right? majority of focus. Not all. Also a lot of your questioning Corazon, at least today, was entirely unproductive, and balancing out posting on foolishness with banging your head against a wall isn't really balance.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 15 2013 01:01 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2013 00:59 marvellosity wrote:On March 15 2013 00:58 austinmcc wrote:
I honestly think that there's less of a chance they're both town than there is of them both being mafia. As in, there's an outside chance both are mafia, and an outside outside outside outside chance they're both town.
Each is spending a majority of his focus on the other. Makes it look less suspicious that neither is taking control over town in a bunch of aspects and directing things, because they're really just focused on this one guy, and when that one guy flips scum, ta da! All the effort worth it. More focus on a singular targets just helps duck a policy lynch later on, imo. You do realise that I wanted to lynch Corazon earlier in the day before Hiro prodded me back towards Foolish, right? majority of focus. Not all. Also a lot of your questioning Corazon, at least today, was entirely unproductive, and balancing out posting on foolishness with banging your head against a wall isn't really balance.
Actually it's been productive from my point of view. His refusal to answer basic questions have been very revealing.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I'll make it quite clear now.
If I am alive at LYLO, then lynch me.
Quote this post against me later. I plan to have all the mafia dead before LYLO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
