EPTNewbie Mini Mafia XXXVIII - Page 23
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
| ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
| ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
If someone else in here is the cop, for the love of god do not counterclaim. Hopefully you know what to do because I'm starting to get wary of giving out basic strategies/tips out loud. | ||
|
bduddy
United States1326 Posts
On March 08 2013 15:15 WaveofShadow wrote: Umm... no, I certainly did not claim cop, I was speaking hypothetically. I may not be good at this, but I'm not a complete idiot.You didn't just claim cop D1 did you?  Alright bduddy I'll spell out a couple things for you. 1) Claiming a blue role this early in the game essentially paints a big ol' bullseye on your back for mafia to target. If they manage to shoot you N1 you won't have performed any checks and are useless to us. 2) When I'm asking for your scumreads, I'm asking you to tell us who you think are scum and WHY. "I have a good feeling about NW," or "I feel suspicious" means dick all if you don't have anything to back it up. In conclusion, do a little a thinking before you post about the repercussions of your actions and what it means to other people when you say certain things, and you'll go a long way. Don't just spew your thoughts into the thread for no apparent reason. It doesn't help us find scum. I understand that I should post reasons, and I'll try to do that better in the future. There's just not that much to go on... I explained in my post before the quoted one why I think TRN is likely to be scum. | ||
|
MeatlessTaco
United States302 Posts
On March 08 2013 15:09 bduddy wrote: ... I did say that I'm feeling a bit suspicious towards TRN and Rainbows, is that what you mean by "scumreads"? ... I know you didn't claim cop. Other people over reacted. But, you do plenty of hedging and hawing and excusing yourself... which is poor play, but understandable. But, don't play dumb. Do you not understand what "scumread" means by context? If you have enough time to play, tell us why you want want Raven lynched and not the other two people you spent more time analyzing. | ||
|
bduddy
United States1326 Posts
On March 08 2013 15:43 MeatlessTaco wrote: Me excusing myself is because I legitimately had much more important stuff to do last night and today and didn't want to look like a guy that lurked for 1.5 days and then popped out at the end with random excuses. As for Raven, first off, I agree with what you said earlier about his suspicious posting patterns at the beginning of the game. I think it's suspicious how much he followed along with making a "joke vote" and then unvoting when everyone else was doing so - it seems scummy to me to try to follow others so much. I also think that his post about not lynching liars is suspicious - newbies make mistakes, sure, but I don't see how new townies would lie about anything. Finally, my suspicions are only reinforced by his last post - Dear god is lurking into blue claim scummy as hell. doesn't seem to match his previous posting style, and makes me think he might be playing dumb.I know you didn't claim cop. Other people over reacted. But, you do plenty of hedging and hawing and excusing yourself... which is poor play, but understandable. But, don't play dumb. Do you not understand what "scumread" means by context? If you have enough time to play, tell us why you want want Raven lynched and not the other two people you spent more time analyzing. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
| ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
| ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
This vote is basically the result suspiciously targeting lurkers but more importantly the lack of an acceptable coherent defence. Rainbow, it strikes me as odd that while you have accused/pressured people to find out their position on certain matters but your position is not clear. In what circumstances would you lynch a lurker? | ||
|
bduddy
United States1326 Posts
On March 08 2013 16:08 TheRavensName wrote: You mean the "blue" thing? I get that, having looked at some other Mafia games. But it doesn't match your previous posting style in this game... and the many spelling mistakes you've been making don't match your posting style in general. Again, I think you've been playing dumb.Its one of the few things that seems to carry over between versions of this game bduddy. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
| ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
| ||
|
Frorgon
United States146 Posts
Nobodywonder still looking real scummy. Unvotes bduddy after the terrible explanation provided. I'm thinking they could both be scum covering for each other. NW makes a case early on against bduddy without actually being serious about it so there are no reprocussions. Bduddy has his suspicion on people who in my opinion don't same overly scummy as of yet, and is defending NW. Right now I'm narrowing down my vote between NW and bduddy and I plan to make an actual vote shortly after they respond, if they respond. There should still be a decent amount of time on the clock for D1 after my vote. | ||
|
Krafla
United Kingdom104 Posts
##Vote: nobodywonder I was expecting a post from him highlighting my failings, namely my unfortunate post timing and my inability to make a decision, so here's my decision. I also expect he'll call me out for bandwagoning and just jumping on him to hide myself because everyone else was voting for him, so let me nip that one in the bud and explain myself. I was hoping to wait a little bit longer and find someone else to vote for who appeared more suspicious, although as it stands at the moment I can't. Saying that, I noted that nobodywonder wanted to play hard with the lurkers, which I completely understand, yet he has a go at me for making similar suggestions, we were just going about it different ways. On March 08 2013 08:53 nobodywonder wrote: ...i'd say the most suspicious active is Krafla he hasn't really contributed. all he says is to reserve judgment and not vote, but his gut says a no-lynch would be a bad thing. i'd say that's a contradiction and that he should really be actively pursuing leads... I've now realised that a no-lynch would be bad for us due to not giving us any information and basically giving the mob a walkover on day 1. The only two people that I've had suspicions about so far have been nobodywonder and MeatlessTaco. nobodywonder asked why I was suspicious of MeatlessTaco, the only reason was his unrelenting attack early on in the game, I realise now that this might have just been to promote discussion. At the moment Meatless has done well getting discussion out of people, so for that alone I'm not going to vote for him. nobodywonder at the best hasn't created any discusion and at the worst has suggested some people who might be masons. This might not be classic scum play, but it's definitely not helpful town play. | ||
|
Arctic Daishi
United States152 Posts
##vote: Krafla | ||
|
Arctic Daishi
United States152 Posts
On March 08 2013 02:06 OmniEulogy wrote: @Arctic Can give us your thoughts on what has happened so far and answer most of the questions I have asked to the others. Been reading up on recent happenings for about 15 minutes now. I tend to agree with Krafla, TheRavensName and OmniEulogy in that no-lynching is a bad idea. If we don't start gathering information now, then we'll be off to a disadvantage. I think if there's a possibility of lynching someone on the other side, then we should take it. This is my first game though, so I could very well be making the wrong move. I voted for Kafla, because a few other people suspected him as well, making him suspicious. | ||
|
Arctic Daishi
United States152 Posts
##Vote: nobodywonder | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Krafla (0): MLuneth (0): nobodywonder (6): bduddy (0): Arctic Daishi (0): ChewOnStu (2): Rainbows, MeatlessTaco TheRavensName (1): bduddy No vote: OmniEulogy, Frorgon, WaveofShadow, nobodywonder nobodywonder is currently set to be lynched. 9.5 hours until the deadline. Voting is mandatory. Please remember to bold your votes, and to unvote if you've previously voted for someone else. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On March 09 2013 00:17 Arctic Daishi wrote: ##Unvote ##Vote: nobodywonder Why did you change your vote with no explination over the course of 13 minutes? | ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On March 08 2013 16:29 MLuneth wrote: ##Vote: nobodywonder This vote is basically the result suspiciously targeting lurkers but more importantly the lack of an acceptable coherent defence. Rainbow, it strikes me as odd that while you have accused/pressured people to find out their position on certain matters but your position is not clear. In what circumstances would you lynch a lurker? A useless question. Policy is pointless, and the fact that we (you) are still talking about it is also pointless. | ||
| ||
