|
he can say that easily when he never planned to vote me to begin with. As Vivax pointed out he was more in austins favor earlier on.
|
Well that's even more scummy, expressing so many reasons to vote each other into the seat but not doing so cause they were scared of the connections.
Only Chezinu dared to try.
We should be lynching austin tomorrow. Scum is never going to shoot him, he just gave an excuse for that. In truth, he's gonna stay alive until the end cause he is scum himself.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
Ok, so despite the fact that bugs (confirmed flipped town DT) and I are pretty damn certain austin isn't mafia, you guys want to lynch him. Great.
|
I mean I still don't want to lynch austin tomorrow now that I thought about it the last hour or something like that.
But he still looks fishy imo.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
austin *could* be mafia, but I'd lynch a whole bunch of guys above him.
The reasons for annul/stutters/clarity/debears/fuba to be town are much weaker than for austin.
|
11589 Posts
On January 29 2013 02:17 FiveTouch wrote: Ok, so despite the fact that bugs (confirmed flipped town DT) and I are pretty damn certain austin isn't mafia, you guys want to lynch him. Great. Your reason (singular) provided in defense of Austin is relatively minor in the face of what I've seen in his filter, and what we just witnessed.
Besides, you were wrong on Oats D2, and wrong on BKE D3. You are not infallible.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
I never said I was infallible, but when bugs and I have equally strong feelings about someone, it's usually a sign of something.
|
11589 Posts
On January 29 2013 02:18 FiveTouch wrote: austin *could* be mafia, but I'd lynch a whole bunch of guys above him.
The reasons for annul/stutters/clarity/debears/fuba to be town are much weaker than for austin. Funny how that list got longer since the last time you posted it.
Riddle me this: if both mafia are among that group, what hope do they have of winning?
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 29 2013 02:20 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 29 2013 02:18 FiveTouch wrote: austin *could* be mafia, but I'd lynch a whole bunch of guys above him.
The reasons for annul/stutters/clarity/debears/fuba to be town are much weaker than for austin. Funny how that list got longer since the last time you posted it. Riddle me this: if both mafia are among that group, what hope do they have of winning?
Because people like you want to lynch people like austin?
|
11589 Posts
On January 29 2013 02:19 FiveTouch wrote: I never said I was infallible, but when bugs and I have equally strong feelings about someone, it's usually a sign of something. What's your "strong feeling" if you think he "could be mafia".
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
Why are you asking me stupid questions?
|
11589 Posts
On January 29 2013 02:22 FiveTouch wrote: Why are you asking me stupid questions? Why are you defending someone with a weak piece of WIFOM?
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 29 2013 02:22 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 29 2013 02:22 FiveTouch wrote: Why are you asking me stupid questions? Why are you defending someone with a weak piece of WIFOM?
why don't you ask bugs the same thing?
|
11589 Posts
On January 29 2013 02:22 FiveTouch wrote:Show nested quote +On January 29 2013 02:22 yamato77 wrote:On January 29 2013 02:22 FiveTouch wrote: Why are you asking me stupid questions? Why are you defending someone with a weak piece of WIFOM? why don't you ask bugs the same thing? Because he's dead, and you're alive, yet you're sheeping his reads blindly despite being a good player in your own right.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
I've explained quite clearly why I agree with bugs.
Except you're dismissing the same reasoning we've both used as 'weak wifom'.
There's not a lot I can do about that.
|
11589 Posts
BESIDES:
If mafia really wanted Gonzaw elected, they had the votes to surpass Toad.
Which means either they got someone elected, or they weren't really invested in getting elected. Either way Austin's run doesn't mean anything.
|
11589 Posts
On January 29 2013 02:24 FiveTouch wrote: I've explained quite clearly why I agree with bugs.
Except you're dismissing the same reasoning we've both used as 'weak wifom'.
There's not a lot I can do about that. How about give any other justification other than a one liner post bugs made over a cycle ago.
|
Marv, if you are scum you are a real Judas for getting the spot by lynching prplhz.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
I've explained it repeatedly in the last couple of pages.
|
11589 Posts
On January 29 2013 02:26 FiveTouch wrote: I've explained it repeatedly in the last couple of pages. And obviously I disagree, with logic that is valid.
All you're doing right now is an appeal to authority which is incredibly weak.
|
|
|
|