|
On November 28 2012 10:10 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2012 10:07 goodkarma wrote:On November 28 2012 10:03 iamperfection wrote:On November 28 2012 09:57 goodkarma wrote:
2) VE - Shoot him dead. I actually think he might be more likely to be town than scum given his enthusiasm for playing scum. But if an elimination-based approach for finding scum is to work, he has to go. He has not posted enough to make a meaningful read...
And i cant believe you said something like this im gonna have to go through your entire filter when i have time That might be the first productive thing you've done all game... Care to explain in what universe that it would be good idea that you think its a good idea to shoot ve if you think he is more likely to be town.
He is gone. Absent. Nonpresent. I actually don't know much about his meta outside of what I've heard of his reputation here, so that was speculation. He could be town. He could be scum. But come endgame, there's no way of knowing. Therefore, he has to go.
|
On November 28 2012 10:17 Hapahauli wrote:I think you highlighted the wrong thing VE Show nested quote +2) VE - Shoot him dead. I actually think he might be more likely to be town than scum given his enthusiasm for playing scum. But if an elimination-based approach for finding scum is to work, he has to go. He has not posted enough to make a meaningful read... ^ That's pretty damn scummy right there.
Yeah well - Kush proved that town say stupid as fuck things EXACTLY LIKE THAT in Liquid City so I subtracted that particular nonsense from the equation. It's scummy, but town say that shit too.
I was focused more on the association it implied with SnB.
|
On November 28 2012 10:18 goodkarma wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2012 10:10 iamperfection wrote:On November 28 2012 10:07 goodkarma wrote:On November 28 2012 10:03 iamperfection wrote:On November 28 2012 09:57 goodkarma wrote:
2) VE - Shoot him dead. I actually think he might be more likely to be town than scum given his enthusiasm for playing scum. But if an elimination-based approach for finding scum is to work, he has to go. He has not posted enough to make a meaningful read...
And i cant believe you said something like this im gonna have to go through your entire filter when i have time That might be the first productive thing you've done all game... Care to explain in what universe that it would be good idea that you think its a good idea to shoot ve if you think he is more likely to be town. He is gone. Absent. Nonpresent. I actually don't know much about his meta outside of what I've heard of his reputation here, so that was speculation. He could be town. He could be scum. But come endgame, there's no way of knowing. Therefore, he has to go.
so maybe you should do some research non talking ve isn't like ve at all either way. Just because its different it doesn't mean he is scum
|
On November 28 2012 10:19 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2012 10:17 Hapahauli wrote:I think you highlighted the wrong thing VE 2) VE - Shoot him dead. I actually think he might be more likely to be town than scum given his enthusiasm for playing scum. But if an elimination-based approach for finding scum is to work, he has to go. He has not posted enough to make a meaningful read... ^ That's pretty damn scummy right there. Yeah well - Kush proved that town say stupid as fuck things EXACTLY LIKE THAT in Liquid City so I subtracted that particular nonsense from the equation. It's scummy, but town say that shit too. I was focused more on the association it implied with SnB.
Goodkarma is a good town player. He isn't Kush, or even close to that.
|
This isn't a stock game, we don't HAVE to kill all scum. It would be nice ofc but it's not our wincon. We shouldn't work by process of elimination. You can't just got "the scum are in this list of 11 people so just kill all of them", we need townies to kill lavos, even if they're absent most of the time. VE said he would try to be active, today is not a lynchday, how about we give him a chance before we shoot him? Plenty of targets much better than him.
Back to bed for me.
|
On November 28 2012 10:20 Hapahauli wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2012 10:19 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 28 2012 10:17 Hapahauli wrote:I think you highlighted the wrong thing VE 2) VE - Shoot him dead. I actually think he might be more likely to be town than scum given his enthusiasm for playing scum. But if an elimination-based approach for finding scum is to work, he has to go. He has not posted enough to make a meaningful read... ^ That's pretty damn scummy right there. Yeah well - Kush proved that town say stupid as fuck things EXACTLY LIKE THAT in Liquid City so I subtracted that particular nonsense from the equation. It's scummy, but town say that shit too. I was focused more on the association it implied with SnB. Goodkarma is a good town player. He isn't Kush, or even close to that.
Good to know. So that actually IS really scummy. Noted.
|
@ve
you going to be busy for the foreseeable future?
|
@VE:
How the hell was I supposed to know you were actually coming back to post more than one-liners? Saying and doing are two very different things...
Now that you've decided to show up, yeah. Let's not shoot you.
Cave and Adam are people I stand by vigi shooting though.
|
On November 28 2012 10:21 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2012 10:20 Hapahauli wrote:On November 28 2012 10:19 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 28 2012 10:17 Hapahauli wrote:I think you highlighted the wrong thing VE 2) VE - Shoot him dead. I actually think he might be more likely to be town than scum given his enthusiasm for playing scum. But if an elimination-based approach for finding scum is to work, he has to go. He has not posted enough to make a meaningful read... ^ That's pretty damn scummy right there. Yeah well - Kush proved that town say stupid as fuck things EXACTLY LIKE THAT in Liquid City so I subtracted that particular nonsense from the equation. It's scummy, but town say that shit too. I was focused more on the association it implied with SnB. Goodkarma is a good town player. He isn't Kush, or even close to that. Good to know. So that actually IS really scummy. Noted.
Correction: I'm a good town player when I don't drink while playing. I'm going to take a break from thread, and play damage control tomorrow.
|
hey the drunk excuse is my thing don't steal it
|
My activity is going to be spotty for at least a week...is that what you're asking? I don't know how long this game is going to last, but I'll be posting at full strength after next weekend. In the meantime I'll post what I can when I can and make no promises.
Did you need something in particular iamp?
|
On November 28 2012 10:23 goodkarma wrote:
@VE:
How the hell was I supposed to know you were actually coming back to post more than one-liners? Saying and doing are two very different things...
Now that you've decided to show up, yeah. Let's not shoot you.
Cave and Adam are people I stand by vigi shooting though.
I think we should better put pressure on Hopeless/Z-Bo/phagga first to see if one of them is scum tehn shoot Cave and Adam.
Cave is already taking hits and I don't think it's coming from the mafia. I would say it's either town or 3rd party chasing after 3rd party.
|
On November 28 2012 10:26 VisceraEyes wrote:
My activity is going to be spotty for at least a week...is that what you're asking? I don't know how long this game is going to last, but I'll be posting at full strength after next weekend. In the meantime I'll post what I can when I can and make no promises.
Did you need something in particular iamp?
No, not really.
Just hoping to see more ve
|
EBWOP: then shoot Cave and even after that Adam if we cannot find scum in Hopeless/Z-bo/phagga.
|
On November 28 2012 10:29 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2012 10:26 VisceraEyes wrote:
My activity is going to be spotty for at least a week...is that what you're asking? I don't know how long this game is going to last, but I'll be posting at full strength after next weekend. In the meantime I'll post what I can when I can and make no promises.
Did you need something in particular iamp? No, not really. Just hoping to see more ve
I know and I'm kinda fucking salty that this RL bullshit happened AS SOON as my slot opened in this game - I'm a TL Resistance veteran and was all like, planning on campaign posters for trying to be leader and shit...but my activity has made it to where I'm not just not going to be considered for leader, I'm not even going to be PART OF THE TEAM most of the time based solely on my inactivity.
Life isn't fair. We do what we can. I hope to make up for being a total failure in that regard by finding some of the scum for if/when we get a lynch again. Stay tuned.
|
On November 28 2012 10:34 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2012 10:29 iamperfection wrote:On November 28 2012 10:26 VisceraEyes wrote:
My activity is going to be spotty for at least a week...is that what you're asking? I don't know how long this game is going to last, but I'll be posting at full strength after next weekend. In the meantime I'll post what I can when I can and make no promises.
Did you need something in particular iamp? No, not really. Just hoping to see more ve I know and I'm kinda fucking salty that this RL bullshit happened AS SOON as my slot opened in this game - I'm a TL Resistance veteran and was all like, planning on campaign posters for trying to be leader and shit...but my activity has made it to where I'm not just not going to be considered for leader, I'm not even going to be PART OF THE TEAM most of the time based solely on my inactivity. Life isn't fair. We do what we can. I hope to make up for being a total failure in that regard by finding some of the scum for if/when we get a lynch again. Stay tuned.
As long as you promise that scumhunting does not entail starting a shitfest bitchfight with Toad, I am totally onboard with that plan. Your absence has been rather troubling. You are hard to read even when posting proliferously and while killing all scum is clearly not town's wincon, I don't doubt that killing Lavos is going to be one helluva lot easier with all scum dead. If that means getting to a lynch with no clear scum reads, lynching inactives is a pretty good policy imho.
Of course, I do have scumreads to go on. I will have to reevaluate H1's filter and risk.nuke has meandered onto my scumdar, so have to take a good look at him too. I think you'd be a good person to ask about risk.nuke. You should have plenty of history together?
|
PS. Your plan for using events to scumhunt is terrible. I'm fairly certain the OP is not lying when it says that failing an event is bad for town.
|
A fair amount - the majority of the experience I have with risk is his teaching me that being a total asshat in-thread is not a scumtell (Election Mafia) and IRC Mafia.
His contributions regardless of alignment are flavored with emotion from my experience with him. He's come across as town(ish) from what I recall seeing from him this game, but obviously I've missed some shit and have to go reevaluate anyway. I'll take a look with you.
|
I know, but FUCK MAN WHY NO LYNCH TODAY?
Scumhunting without flips is fucking HARD DUDE. :/
|
On November 28 2012 10:26 iamperfection wrote:
hey the drunk excuse is my thing don't steal it
Not this game its not...
On November 28 2012 10:29 Djodref wrote:
EBWOP: then shoot Cave and even after that Adam if we cannot find scum in Hopeless/Z-bo/phagga.
Toad first, followed by whoever the fuck else.
Why do you place phagga in there? Lack of content or some new triangle of scummy yelling that I'm not aware of?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
