|
and another thing
(prior to the last 5 minutes of the day), assume my arguments about "i didn't actually defend shady" are terrible (they're not) and you, as a town reading this, honestly believe i did defend shady...
SHADY WAS A GREEN! holy fuck, imagine that: i did my job as a town player in trying to stop a mislynch! this is a bad thing apparently to austinmcc
|
I prefer to see annul dead than Node. The contradiction austin just pointed out is just too much.
Annul explain this too. BEFORE night ends. You tried to start a ZBos wagon 25 minutes before lynch. How were you expecting to get votes other than the "clearly indicative of a town wagon" method of 8 votes in 12 minutes? Seriously, because you were all up in arms about the Node wagon for that reason specifically and exclusively. However, you were counting on votes to appear on ZBos with that speed if you ever intended for ZBos to get lynched.
|
also, i clearly havent been playing this game for a long time if i am this fucking rusty i should not have responded to any of this until day 2.
i will not respond to anything else against me until day 2. i am not going to give the red team more information about whether i can successfully defend against an attack. bad misplay that i gave them this much at nighttime =(
|
On October 03 2012 01:59 VisceraEyes wrote: Annul explain this too. BEFORE night ends.
lol no
i knew it
|
Someone shoot him. We can lynch Node easier than Annul, and I want them both dead.
Medics, on me and marv.
DTs, on BC and Mattchew.
We totally got this.
|
On October 03 2012 02:01 VisceraEyes wrote: Someone shoot him. We can lynch Node easier than Annul, and I want them both dead.
Medics, on me and marv.
DTs, on BC and Mattchew.
We totally got this.
rofl at one of the reddest looking players trying to coordinate blues
|
Addendum: Medics roll a die and protect into me, marv and austin.
|
On October 03 2012 02:02 annul wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2012 02:01 VisceraEyes wrote: Someone shoot him. We can lynch Node easier than Annul, and I want them both dead.
Medics, on me and marv.
DTs, on BC and Mattchew.
We totally got this. rofl at one of the reddest looking players trying to coordinate blues
LOL at one of the reddest looking players trying to make people believe that you believe that one of the greenest looking players is the reddest looking player.
|
On October 03 2012 02:01 VisceraEyes wrote: Someone shoot him. We can lynch Node easier than Annul, and I want them both dead.
Medics, on me and marv.
DTs, on BC and Mattchew.
We totally got this. Granted, there are no clues in the daypost, but I'm a little hesitant to call targets that specifically, given that the OP has all roled in black.
We can't entirely rule out the existence of a mafia medic role.
I'm happy with shots into either node OR annul, because, while annul does feel more difficult to lynch at this point, if node flips red then annul looks awful, and if node flips green then annul looks really, really odd.
|
On October 03 2012 02:01 VisceraEyes wrote: Someone shoot him. We can lynch Node easier than Annul, and I want them both dead.
Medics, on me and marv.
DTs, on BC and Mattchew.
We totally got this. I am down with this plan
|
What does a Paranoid Arsonist do? I looked up arsonist, but have no idea what having paranoid attached to it means.
|
On October 03 2012 02:17 Risen wrote: What does a Paranoid Arsonist do? I looked up arsonist, but have no idea what having paranoid attached to it means. I know paranoid gun owner kills anyone who targets him at night. So I was thinking it was the same thing?
|
EBWOP: There's also some other roles I can't find :/
|
On October 03 2012 02:19 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2012 02:17 Risen wrote: What does a Paranoid Arsonist do? I looked up arsonist, but have no idea what having paranoid attached to it means. I know paranoid gun owner kills anyone who targets him at night. So I was thinking it was the same thing?
So a doctor wouldn't protect someone who targets a paranoid arsonist. Alright.
|
annul is 100% correct that he never defends Shady.
He expresses displeasure with a Shady lynch:On October 02 2012 09:52 annul wrote: is it really between KJ and shady sands? this seems suboptimal to me but does not defend Shady or say why, just that the lynch is suboptimal
But for someone so focused on the minutiae of language used, this:On October 02 2012 11:56 annul wrote: and read node's filter
this was very easy. two posts. first post defends shady and calls out kush; second post retreats from this defense slightly and continues to argue against kush.
considering node's only two posts match what i have been arguing all along............. i like this guy.
the big question now is what it is about these two posts that caused 8 people to drop their pants and go all in on this guy. like, i read the posts... what is there exactly that people are seeing? this doesnt make sense. 8 votes on him so i have to assume with a normal mafia count that there are at least some towns on him.... why? Still leaves me with an impression that he doesn't take issue with node's defense of shady. He's only saying positive things about node's post, and if he disagreed with node on one of the two things that node has done in his posts, I would think that he'd mention so.
But yes, annul did not defend shady earlier in the day. That did not happen. The play has received some bad reviews.
|
On October 03 2012 02:06 austinmcc wrote: if node flips red then annul looks awful,
no. nice try at setting this up, though.
if anything, it makes you look infinitely worse.
|
On October 03 2012 02:27 Risen wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2012 02:19 austinmcc wrote:On October 03 2012 02:17 Risen wrote: What does a Paranoid Arsonist do? I looked up arsonist, but have no idea what having paranoid attached to it means. I know paranoid gun owner kills anyone who targets him at night. So I was thinking it was the same thing? So a doctor wouldn't protect someone who targets a paranoid arsonist. Alright. I just remember PGO from looking it up after seeing that acronym. I dunno the interactions. I think I'm in the same boat just googling names and seeing what pops up.
Oh...hey. Super relevant.
DrH's post on the other queue site:A fairly normal game with excessive flavor. Semi-closed set-up. Role names will be disclosed, but role powers will not be. No in-thread activity requirements but voting is mandatory.
This game will consist of a town, mafia and a single third party player. The third party player winning will not end the game unless he meets a more difficult and specific condition. Certain roles have access to vague clues. There will never be clues in the day or night posts. If a player is mod-killed, they will not flip. I don't think we're meant to know what all the roles mean/do.
Also confirms 1 third party with abnormal win condition.
|
On October 03 2012 02:30 austinmcc wrote: annul is 100% correct that he never defends Shady.
LOLOL
grats on conceding to me a point that negates almost your entire case
|
On October 03 2012 02:33 austinmcc wrote:Oh...hey. Super relevant. DrH's post on the other queue site: Show nested quote +A fairly normal game with excessive flavor. Semi-closed set-up. Role names will be disclosed, but role powers will not be. No in-thread activity requirements but voting is mandatory.
This game will consist of a town, mafia and a single third party player. The third party player winning will not end the game unless he meets a more difficult and specific condition. Certain roles have access to vague clues. There will never be clues in the day or night posts. If a player is mod-killed, they will not flip. I don't think we're meant to know what all the roles mean/do. Also confirms 1 third party with abnormal win condition.
link to this pls
|
hey VE and austin
0-100% how sure are each of you that i am a red?
|
|
|
|