TL Mafia LVII - Page 56

On September 08 2012 01:31 slOosh wrote:
Psh, what's most damning about Maverick is the fact that he has scum reads Forumite and DYH, and agrees with the case on BKEXE and yet for some reason waffles and ends up wanting to lynch a lurker. Good followup lynch.

On September 08 2012 02:13 Maverick32x wrote:
I honestly have no problem voting BKE. I thought I was clear with reason I voted for Shiao... I wanted him to post... And look!! He's had more posts after be called out than all game!

Also yes- I'm considering more than one person as scummy or pointing out odd behaviors...

On September 07 2012 13:12 Maverick32x wrote:
@DoYouHas-
Solid defense, and you're right- I was probably tunneling too hard on filters. I still think the reliance on 'Meta' is not a reliable way to contribute to THIS game...

@Forumite-
I guess we have different perspectives when it comes to scum hunting? The majority of players are town.. so wouldn't it be smarter to do some 'innocent until proven guilty'? As opposed to just blasting everyone because everyone else is doing it?

All this being said- I'm wondering if we should just lynch a lurker? I feel like allowing scum to lurk is a bad plan?

On September 04 2012 18:38 goodkarma wrote:
But we still should be trying to create a pro-town environment going into day two. Along those lines:

The guiltiest lurkers are listed as follows, in no particular order:
Gravan, austinmc, imallinson, Strongandbig, Miltonkram

On September 05 2012 09:27 goodkarma wrote:
Grush is at modkill-threshold. I don't expect he's going to be around all that much longer. Until he makes his first post, I consider any time spent pressuring him as a waste.

On the other hand, Gravan, Lvdr, austinmc, maverick, ShadySands, and ShioPi all stand out to me as semi-lurkers. Some of them seem to have legitimate reasons (such as ShadySands), but that doesn't mean they aren't scum with legitimate reasons.

On September 07 2012 11:37 Hapahauli wrote:
Before I go to bed for the night:

BroodKingEXE

He has two very suspicious posts regarding two confirmed players: Mattchew and Ottoxlol.

---

A bit before Mattchew is scum-confirmed (right around when a few players start voting for Mattchew), Broodking posts this unbelievably wishy-washy opinion on Mattchew.


Look at the logic - he first thinks its a great idea, then there are "too many holes."
He doesn't want to lynch him because his "roleclaim isn't verifiable until he is lynched" - the hell?
He said he's town originally, then says "its a coinflip"
Then he says "Fakeclaims aren't good basis for a lynch" and wants to wait until "mattchew sounds scummy". Again, the fakeclaim is the entire reason everyone voted for him.

But wait! Two pages after the fakeclaim (and before Mattchew posted anything in the interim):


After stating earlier that the fakeclaim wasn't enough to lynch Mattchew, he votes Mattchew for that very reasoning.

---

His viewpoints on Ottoxlol are the nail in the coffin:

Goes from top scumread:


Then proceeds to push cases against Miltonkram, Shadysands, and Gravan while Ottox is his top scumread:

Then says strange things about potentially townie Ottox while keeping a scumread on him.


Then SOFT DEFENDS OTTOX when talking to DrH

---

BroodKingEXE is scum!

##Vote BroodKingEXE

On September 08 2012 03:12 BroodKingEXE wrote:

I've got a break to post. The reason I didn't like the idea of voting for a fake-claim is because short of Mod-confirmation, we wouldn't have any way to confirm BC's theory 1. I switched my vote because the fake-claim was confirmed and Mattchew had made no attempt to explain the fake-claim from a town perspective 2.

...Another problem I find with lynching him is that what he has done (roleclaim) isn't verifiable until he is lynched...

@ Rewok - Kinda surprised you don't have any solid reads after your long post earlier in the game declaring everyone "null"

Any updates? Town/Mafia reads or otherwise?

On September 04 2012 16:20 BroodKingEXE wrote:
About Mattchew (who I think is town):
Here's my breakdown of the situation : Matt's roleclaimed and given two reasons he claimed to avoid mislynch and/or draw a mafia shot. At first glance the roleclaim seemed like a great idea, but as I thought about it there were just too many holes. My initial thought was that it was a good idea and that could have been Matt's (based on the reasoning too). Another problem I find with lynching him is that what he has done (roleclaim) isn't verifiable until he is lynched. Right now its a coinflip and I haven't seen anything else that suggests he is scum. Fakeclaims aren't good basis for a lynch, they're not even able to be confirmed until the lynch, so I cant vote for him unless his posting sounds scummy.

On September 04 2012 16:20 BroodKingEXE wrote:
About Mattchew (who I think is town):
Here's my breakdown of the situation : Matt's roleclaimed and given two reasons he claimed to avoid mislynch and/or draw a mafia shot. At first glance the roleclaim seemed like a great idea, but as I thought about it there were just too many holes. My initial thought was that it was a good idea and that could have been Matt's (based on the reasoning too). Another problem I find with lynching him is that what he has done (roleclaim) isn't verifiable until he is lynched. Right now its a coinflip and I haven't seen anything else that suggests he is scum. Fakeclaims aren't good basis for a lynch, they're not even able to be confirmed until the lynch, so I cant vote for him unless his posting sounds scummy.