Normal Mini Mafia III - Page 21

On August 22 2012 12:57 VisceraEyes wrote:
Throughout his filter, Shady Sands does nothing but fling baseless suspicion around the thread at anyone posting for any reason. Go look for yourself, he literally hasn't said anything of substance for me to quote as proof. Every post he makes is a leading, accusatory, one-time interaction with someone in the thread...or arguing with marvellosity. Never have we seen a read or an opinion of his own. Even in arguing with marvellosity I don't get the feeling that Shady thinks marv is scum - and that DOMINATES his filter.

##Unvote
##Vote Shady Sands

On August 23 2012 02:40 VisceraEyes wrote:
You're certainly sticking your neck out to defend him marv. I hope he appreciates it. <3

On August 23 2012 02:37 VisceraEyes wrote:
Interesting. However, that aside, his actions since joining the game are damning. He stated upon returning that he wants to lynch lurkers because "they're bad for town later". However, as his recent play shows, lurkers was never really an issue for him...because there are still people who qualify as lurkers in the game (damaging, even) yet he's contented to ride this Kville wagon. Why? Doesn't he care about town? Didn't he want to remedy the lurker situation?

I'm disappointed with the level of activity here. I think that we're letting lurkers get off a little too easy. I'm especially suspicious of people who haven't posted, as it's already been a full 12 hours since the game started, more than enough time for players to post. Moreover, this playstyle is unfair to town, since town by default has to go off of evidence to scumhunt and if everyone is lurking scum gets a free ride in terms of not having to give up much evidence.

I'm going to go with a rando-vote on a lurker unless someone can claim me otherwise with a compelling case. I haven't yet seen a case that's good enough so far.

On August 23 2012 03:23 talismania wrote:
upcaught!

VE I was with you on shady until he started going after kville. I thought the reasoning behind going for lurkers smelled like bs but the way he went after kville was genuine. like picking up on the fact that marv was out of kville's list is a townie trait and it all fits with what people say about him being a tunneler.

On August 23 2012 02:05 Obvious.660 wrote:
Alllllrightythen.

I'll take a look at Kville, who apparently came into the thread to push some suspicion away from himself and cast wild accusations at others. Then to disappear. So that's cool I guess.

So his preliminary, opening "case" that is his list of people have "sketchy posts":
Followed up by adding Marv who has has already cast suspicion on AND voted for, after being called out for forgetting to add him to the list.
So there's no evidence exactly what those sketchy posts were, outside of the train of votes for Kville and somehow the interactions between those players being evidence of a scum team?This post above is making mountains from molehills. Implying connections this early in a mini game, where people working together (scums, masons) are likely to be far more careful of being linked by meta-factors such as post timing, is rather silly. It's a good bit of evidence to bring up when looking at other such coincidences and making further reads, but until those situations present themselves I just don't see any justification for making the call that it's linking them as scum partners.

---

I think I like this one the most, though:Marv has earned his FOS and Vote for what I see as OMGUS reasons, and Kville is now certain that he has found a second scum in Shady Sands. Oooookay. Next we're going to hear how if X flips Red then Y must be Red? Kville's entire train of though needs to be explained.

On August 23 2012 03:26 Shady Sands wrote:


Thanks for the support... what's your read on KVille?