• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:15
CEST 15:15
KST 22:15
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN2The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL19Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task30[ASL19] Ro4 Recap : The Peak15
Community News
Weekly Cups (May 19-25): Hindsight is 20/20?0DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack8[BSL20] RO20 Group Stage2EWC 2025 Regional Qualifiers (May 28-June 1)13Weekly Cups (May 12-18): Clem sweeps WardiTV May3
StarCraft 2
General
The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN Karma, Domino Effect, and how it relates to SC2. Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator Can anyone explain to me why u cant veto a matchup
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO12 - Group B EWC 2025 Regional Qualifiers (May 28-June 1) DreamHack Dallas 2025 [GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO12 - Group A RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void Mutation # 472 Dead Heat
Brood War
General
GG Lan Party Bulgaria (Live in about 3 hours) BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Battle.net is not working Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans? Practice Partners (Official)
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Monster Hunter Wilds Beyond All Reason Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia: Generative Agents Showdown Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine All you football fans (soccer)! European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL.net Ten Commandments
Blogs
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Yes Sir! How Commanding Impr…
TrAiDoS
Poker
Nebuchad
Info SLEgma_12
SLEgma_12
SECOND COMMING
XenOsky
WombaT’s Old BW Terran Theme …
WombaT
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 16144 users

Newbie Mini Mafia XXIV - Page 17

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 15 16 17 18 19 57 Next
DarthPunk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia10854 Posts
August 16 2012 14:35 GMT
#321
Also when is the deadline? and could I get a vote count please <3
"If I wanted your opinion, I'd have told you what it was."
marvellosity
Profile Joined January 2011
United Kingdom36160 Posts
August 16 2012 14:37 GMT
#322
Deadline is in just under 9.5 hours. Hopefully Kei will be providing a votecount in the not too distant future.
[15:15] <Palmar> and yes marv, you're a total hottie
thrawn2112
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States6918 Posts
August 16 2012 15:00 GMT
#323
On August 16 2012 19:32 Shady Sands wrote:
Okay, I just posted and I immediately saw Ochrow and Thrawn both trying to get a train on Archrun going (both posting within 30 minutes of each other.) This just reconfirms my theory:

Ochrow and Thrawn are, at the very least, working together, and given how Thrawn's been so WIFOMy and sheepy for the game, I'd reckon they are not masons but scum.


Just to show you how absurd of an argument this is, I'd like to point something out. You said that you saw both ochrow and I, within 30 minutes of each other were "trying to get a train on archrun going." Well, you and Archrun both voted against me within 3 minutes. If I use the reasoning you used to link me with ochrow as both scum, I must also link you with Archrun as scum.

Really shady, your arguments against me have been quite a stretch, and over and over you have ignored my responses to your accusations. I do not think that if you are thoroughly reading my posts that you would still have the belief that I am scum. I will go over our conversation and try to figure out if I have been unclear in my responses to you, and I urge you to go through the conversation to see if you might have missed out on what I was trying to say. If we can't figure this out, then my only options are to think that you are scum and trying to set me up, or that you are town and making weak reads and terrible arguments. I think it is the former so I am going to vote for you. If it is the latter, I won't feel TOO bad about lynching a town player who makes bad arguments.

Whatever happened to your campaign to get everyone posting their previous game filters? Based on what you have done since demanding filters from everyone, I don't see a pro-town motive for your request. Your reasoning in asking for them was that having filters can be very useful in getting reads on people's posts that are made in specific circumstances, such as what a player usually acts like when accused of being scum. After asking for everyone's filters, you haven't even brought the subject back up. What was the point of asking in the first place if you are not going to follow through with analysis? If you wanted to view the filters for your own sole benefit, it would have been way easier for you to just find the filters yourself. If you wanted the group to view the filters so that the town can make better reads, then why haven't you provided any analysis of a player's posting within this game to their posting within previous games? I can't figure out why you asked from them in the first place, which leads me to the conclusion that your filter requests were fluff.

##Vote Shady Sands
"People think they know all these things about other people, and if you ask them why they think they know that, it'd be hard for them to be convincing." ES
Jhuyt
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Sweden365 Posts
August 16 2012 15:07 GMT
#324
Initial thoughts on the whole Thrawn and Och thing:

Looking through Och's posts about Arch I can't say that they make much sense, he just goes straight after Arch when he hadn't posted anything suspicious in my book. I can only see two reasons for him to do it.

1. He really thinks that Arch is scum for reasons that I can not grasp.
If this is true I don't Och is a townie and Thrawn is scum.

The reason I think this makes Thrawn scum is because he would have just saw a guy going after another and then he followed suit, like scum usually do in my experience.

This is however very unlikely in my opinion, because why wouldn't he go after me who already have suspisions on me?
for this reason, I don't think that Och is townie and Thrawn is scum

2. They are both scum and they decided to single out a guy

This makes sense as to why they would both go on Arch when no one else is doing it, they tried both to be convincing to
get as many people as possible with them and lynch Arch.

This still leaves the question why they didn't go after me instead Arch with suspicions already on me.

While this might not be the strongest of evidence I do think that it's very likely that Thrawn is scum and therefore I will FoS him.

##FoS thrawn2112
[17:32] <catphone> Roll for % cooler [17:32] <catphone> .roll d20 [17:32] <+Sweetiebot> catphone: 20 (d20=20)
DarthPunk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia10854 Posts
August 16 2012 15:28 GMT
#325
OK I am reading through the thread and taking notes. I will probably just turn these notes into my post.

Your Harry:
On August 16 2012 11:47 YourHarry wrote:
If I am scum and knew that they were green, you could accept my sudden change in my point of view regarding Solar's alignment. Would scum Harry decide to compromise what seems to be a semi-promising mislynch in Solar (assuming Solar is not Harry's scum partner) to risk being suspected, by trying to protect who scum Harry thought was a mason? Then continue to sacrifice being suspicious by not revealing his initial read even despite continuous pressure, until it became obvious that Harry was wrong about his mason reads?

Or is this more likely the course of action from a town Harry?


This defense of your day 1 posting behaviour is WIFOM and incredibly difficult to make sense of. I don't know if it is your logic that I have a problem with or the way you are explaining yourself, but I am far from satisfied with this explanation.

You were convinced enough to vote for solar sail. And then based on a lacklustre interpretation of GK's post, changed your mind completely. Aside from the fact that I do not see from that solitary post that GK is either mason or scum as you do, your posting seems to be based entirely on a mind blowingly large assumption. What I further find suspicious with you is the MARKED DIFFERENCE in your posting as soon as you were found to be suspicious. And that you resorted almost entirely to WIFOM in your defense.

The Part of your story that bothers me the most is this.

You were 'convinced' solarsail was scum. Then after one innocuous post from GK. View your number one scum read and GK as masoned. To change your mind this drastically that quickly and to leap to the assumption of a mason pair rather than scum without question is very strange. There are several more natural assumptions to make in that situation especially when you were 'convinced' Solar was scum:

-Goodkarma simply believed Solar was bad town. This does not rule out solar as scum, and is by far the most likely scenario.

-Goodkarma was defending her scum buddy. I do not believe this to be the case but I find this to be a far more likely assumption when the person she was 'defending' was clear scum in your mind.
(you use WIFOM to eliminate this)

-Goodkarma and solar are masoned. a huge assumption based on the content of GK's post.
The only way this scenario jumps out at you as the immediate answer is if YOU KNEW BOTH SOLAR AND GOODKARMA'S ALIGNMENT.

The slip is that you behaved in a way that is natural for someone whom knows these players alignments. And have attempted to explain away the more natural assumptions that someone in the dark would take with WIFOM.

You even admit that your 'stated' reasoning behind the entire fiasco is WIFOM and barely believe it yourself.
On August 16 2012 13:47 YourHarry wrote:
actually, upon re-evaluation, I can accept the possibility that GK was indeed not sure about Solar's alignment but was indeed worried that we may tunnel on a player that he somehow thought was a town. Still, the alternative is also possible. It could have been a scum slip that GK is now fabricating the explanations for. Either way, since this is WIFOM, I want to partially retract my case against GK.


and yet you were so sure and seemed incredulous when questioned.

Your day one posting has been ridiculous, you have flip flopped your vote around, Defended your self with WIFOM, encouraged others to confrim you as town to your doubters, been incredibly wishy-washy and your explanation is a stretch at best, and a scumslip at worst.

I will continue to watch you closely.

In order to avoid an incredible wall of text I think I will just post this and then continue on reading the thread.
"If I wanted your opinion, I'd have told you what it was."
Keirathi
Profile Joined May 2012
United States4679 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-16 15:48:17
August 16 2012 15:34 GMT
#326
Vote count (condensed version):

ShadySands (2): SolarSail, thrawn2112,
thrawn2112 (2): ShadySands, Archrun,
goodkarma (1): YourHarry,
Jhuyt (1): goodkarma,
Archrun (1): Ochrow,

Not voted yet: DarthPunk, Jhuyt, Stutters695, mkfuba07, Golbat, Z-Boson


+ Show Spoiler [Full version] +
Vote count (full version with unvotes):

ShadySands (2): SolarSail, thrawn2112,
SolarSail (0): YourHarry,
thrawn2112 (2): YourHarry,ShadySands, Archrun,
goodkarma (1): YourHarry,
Jhuyt (1): goodkarma,
Archrun (1): Ochrow,



thrawn2112 currently set to be lynched. Just under 8.5 hours until the deadline!

As a reminder, use correct formatting for your votes/unvotes if you want them to count. ##Vote, ##Unvote.
My dear friend if I have gone pants on head, you have gone socks on ears!!! -ShiaoPi
Shady Sands
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States4021 Posts
August 16 2012 15:35 GMT
#327
On August 17 2012 00:00 thrawn2112 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 16 2012 19:32 Shady Sands wrote:
Okay, I just posted and I immediately saw Ochrow and Thrawn both trying to get a train on Archrun going (both posting within 30 minutes of each other.) This just reconfirms my theory:

Ochrow and Thrawn are, at the very least, working together, and given how Thrawn's been so WIFOMy and sheepy for the game, I'd reckon they are not masons but scum.


Just to show you how absurd of an argument this is, I'd like to point something out. You said that you saw both ochrow and I, within 30 minutes of each other were "trying to get a train on archrun going." Well, you and Archrun both voted against me within 3 minutes. If I use the reasoning you used to link me with ochrow as both scum, I must also link you with Archrun as scum.


That wasn't the only piece of evidence linking Thrawn to Ochrow. It started when he basically quoted Och's post word for word as your entire justification for starting the FoS on Archrun, and then defended Och from Z-Boson on Och's behalf. The back-to-back posts were just the icing on the cake.

Really shady, your arguments against me have been quite a stretch, and over and over you have ignored my responses to your accusations. I do not think that if you are thoroughly reading my posts that you would still have the belief that I am scum. I will go over our conversation and try to figure out if I have been unclear in my responses to you, and I urge you to go through the conversation to see if you might have missed out on what I was trying to say. If we can't figure this out, then my only options are to think that you are scum and trying to set me up, or that you are town and making weak reads and terrible arguments. I think it is the former so I am going to vote for you. If it is the latter, I won't feel TOO bad about lynching a town player who makes bad arguments.


Generally, threatening someone with a counter-lynch unless they acquiesce to one's defense is a clear scumtell. That being said, I think I've more than covered any defenses Thrawn's offered. The most coherent defenses he offered was simply copy-pasting what he wrote on Archrun again and rehashing your paragraph on Solar. Again, with the Archrun paragraph, there were a whole bunch of other posters such as YH and Solar and JHuyt which you could have gone after, but which he didn't, and regarding Solar, he never again mentioned his accusations against him after responding to them just once (just like his "response" to Golbat).

Pulling up out of the details for a second, the bigger question is why, after the whole Solar/YH/me cases, would he feel that the best way to secure a D1 lynch would be to find lurkers who haven't posted content yet? There were three giant cases floating around that he simply discounted, instead choosing to focus on one case by Ochrow as the entire justification for his initial FoS on Archrun.

Of course, he covered his ass with additional justifications on Archrun after people called you out on it, but it still doesn't mean you can hide the fact that you FoS'd Archrun with 3 sentences of justification. But again, this is not our only charge against him.

When all of Thrawn's behavior is taken together, this is what it looks like:

1) Lots of soft-defenses of multiple players through the first half of D1
2) Jumping on the Archrun train with poor justification
3) Chainsawing a neutral player (Z-Boson) for attacking the player who you used to justify the Archrun FoS (Ochrow)
4) Continuing to FoS Archrun even after he posted content, sheeping Ochrow the same player who you were defending against Z-Boson
5) Coordinating *all* your reads with Ochrow (including the ones on YH and Solar, the two other contentious players in the game)
6) Threatening to OMGUS lynch me if I don't reread your defense and reconsider my accusations against you
7) OMGUS voting me anyhow

Each of these points, alone, would already constitute anti-town behavior; taken together, they are a clear scumtell.

So then Thrawn decides to shift the argument to the filters.

Whatever happened to your campaign to get everyone posting their previous game filters? Based on what you have done since demanding filters from everyone, I don't see a pro-town motive for your request. Your reasoning in asking for them was that having filters can be very useful in getting reads on people's posts that are made in specific circumstances, such as what a player usually acts like when accused of being scum. After asking for everyone's filters, you haven't even brought the subject back up. What was the point of asking in the first place if you are not going to follow through with analysis? If you wanted to view the filters for your own sole benefit, it would have been way easier for you to just find the filters yourself. If you wanted the group to view the filters so that the town can make better reads, then why haven't you provided any analysis of a player's posting within this game to their posting within previous games? I can't figure out why you asked from them in the first place, which leads me to the conclusion that your filter requests were fluff.

##Vote Shady Sands


Someone asked me about the filters earlier, and this is how I responded:

I find filters a good way to figure out how people react to the stress of either being rightfully or wrongfully accused. For example, I tend to look at how someone responds when they're scum and they're being pressured, to then figure out better and more efficient ways to tunnel them and trap them. I think that every townie needs to have this sort of information on all other townies, in order to make this thread as stressful and difficult a place for scum to post as possible.


The filters aren't there for people to quote and make cases out of. The filters are there so that every townie can see how other townies react to rolling red or green in any given situation, so that all townies are on a level playing field when it comes to finding the right pressure points to dismantle and tunnel someone else to a lynch.
Что?
Shady Sands
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States4021 Posts
August 16 2012 15:39 GMT
#328
Basically, Thrawn is stuck now. He's desperately trying to change the subject, and he's OMGUS voting--both are clear scumtells at this point.

Notice that his original case on Archrun has completely gone out the window. His justification on Arch, if we recall, was built on Arch being a non-contributing lurker. Now he thinks that the likeliest scum is me, someone who is pretty much as far from being a lurker as one can get... just because he thinks I am wrongly accusing him.
Что?
Shady Sands
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States4021 Posts
August 16 2012 15:43 GMT
#329
EBWOP: I tried to change my last two posts from second-person, addressing Thrawn directly, into a 3rd-person tone addressing the town. Evidently I messed up. Please read every mention of "you" or "your" as referring to "Thrawn". Thanks
Что?
thrawn2112
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States6918 Posts
August 16 2012 15:49 GMT
#330
My vote against shady isn't an OMGUS vote. I am geniunly suspicious of him as scum. I think he has been very disingenuous in the way he his arguing his case, which is the motivation for my vote.

In response to shady's latest big post:

I feel like I am posting the same things over and over again in response to the same accusations. Is there anyone other than shady or archrun that want me to defend myself?

I'm going to bed....I've stayed up till 11am. I'm setting my alarm clock to go off in a few hours so I should be back in time to talk about things before the votes are due.
"People think they know all these things about other people, and if you ask them why they think they know that, it'd be hard for them to be convincing." ES
DarthPunk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia10854 Posts
August 16 2012 16:05 GMT
#331
still trawling through the thread. It seems to be a lot more difficult to read than XXII.



On August 16 2012 19:42 Shady Sands wrote:
I am going to say this again very clearly:

## Vote Thrawn2112, ## FoS Ochrow

Everyone just do it.


Yeah shady. Any Town Cred you had just went flying out the window. To be honest I am having trouble following the narrative of the thread right now (perhaps I am just tired.) but this is a very anti-town post.

Your case on thrawn2112 was OK. But attempting to stifle any further discussion and demanding everyone to sheep your reads (which is ironic because this is one of the things you are accusing these people of doing.) Is just flat out ridiculous.

I want some clarity on what your case is.

But the crux of the matter is this correct?
On August 16 2012 20:07 Shady Sands wrote:

But the issue with Archrun is you didn't compare him at all to the other lurkers. Nope. You just went ahead and joined in on Ochrow's accusation of Archrun without even offering any of your own analysis to back it up. Who were those other 3 people who had posted 4 times or less? Can you tell me who you checked?

And of course you can't defend yourself from the blatant double-teaming you and Ochrow are doing. Anyone who has been in the thread in the past day can tell.


You may have already clarified your case and I have not yet got to it. If so could you just make a brief summary of your case.
"If I wanted your opinion, I'd have told you what it was."
Solarsail
Profile Joined July 2012
United Kingdom538 Posts
August 16 2012 16:12 GMT
#332
Shady Sands


There's essentially no way to verify the truth of this statement if only him and Solar can attest to it. I want to hear a clearer read between Solar and JHuyt, specifically why Solar believes JHuyt to be innocent and not worth a lurker lynch.

--JHuyt: Still haven't responded, so my original case on him still stands. Strong FoS, and if he continues to lurk I may consider changing my vote to him to guarantee a no-lynch.

Right now though, my top lynch target is Thrawn. From the first massively WIFOM Serial Killer post, to the WIFOM on Policy, YH, and Solarsail, to his soft defense of Ochrow against Z-Boson--all of this smells extremely scummy. Scum have to look like they're active, scum have to stay alive, and scum have to help each other. Thrawn's posting behavior fits all three motives to a T.

Lynch Thrawn.


Thrawn just said it. Pony thread. I'm not going to elaborate because they are far, far outside the context of this thread save that they happened.

I don't believe Jhuyt is innocent. I just don't have enough reason to put together a case based on his lack of posting so far. To whatever extent you choose to interpret he was defending me, I agree that is suspicious.

I do concede that the effect of my earlier posting was causing thread derailment and was not perhaps the intended effect, but it did generate this current discussion which contains specific positions and evidence from a number of people that will be very useful in future so I wouldn't agree it was all bad.

--

I believe I already unvoted Shady but looks like it didn't count so:

##Unvote

That implies nothing about my current opinion of Shady which will be in my next post shortly.
Everyone left over is a member of the OP race and you have to figure out which one of them is the least OP. - CosmicSpiral
Solarsail
Profile Joined July 2012
United Kingdom538 Posts
August 16 2012 16:13 GMT
#333
EBWOP In case anyone thought I was backtracking, my posting was anti-town in character, yes.
Everyone left over is a member of the OP race and you have to figure out which one of them is the least OP. - CosmicSpiral
Shady Sands
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States4021 Posts
August 16 2012 16:29 GMT
#334
On August 17 2012 01:05 DarthPunk wrote:
still trawling through the thread. It seems to be a lot more difficult to read than XXII.



Show nested quote +
On August 16 2012 19:42 Shady Sands wrote:
I am going to say this again very clearly:

## Vote Thrawn2112, ## FoS Ochrow

Everyone just do it.


Yeah shady. Any Town Cred you had just went flying out the window. To be honest I am having trouble following the narrative of the thread right now (perhaps I am just tired.) but this is a very anti-town post.

Your case on thrawn2112 was OK. But attempting to stifle any further discussion and demanding everyone to sheep your reads (which is ironic because this is one of the things you are accusing these people of doing.) Is just flat out ridiculous.

I want some clarity on what your case is.

But the crux of the matter is this correct?
Show nested quote +
On August 16 2012 20:07 Shady Sands wrote:

But the issue with Archrun is you didn't compare him at all to the other lurkers. Nope. You just went ahead and joined in on Ochrow's accusation of Archrun without even offering any of your own analysis to back it up. Who were those other 3 people who had posted 4 times or less? Can you tell me who you checked?

And of course you can't defend yourself from the blatant double-teaming you and Ochrow are doing. Anyone who has been in the thread in the past day can tell.


You may have already clarified your case and I have not yet got to it. If so could you just make a brief summary of your case.


Here's the summary of the Thrawn case:
1) Lots of soft-defenses of multiple players through the first half of D1
2) Jumping on the Archrun train with poor justification ("non-contributing lurker")
3) Chainsawing a neutral player (Z-Boson) for attacking the player who he used to justify the Archrun FoS (Ochrow)
4) Continuing to FoS Archrun even after he posted content, sheeping Ochrow, the same player who he was defending against Z-Boson
5) Coordinating *all* his reads with Ochrow (including the ones on YH and Solar, the two other contentious players in the game)
6) Threatening to OMGUS lynch me if I don't reread his defense and reconsider my accusations against him (based off the exact opposite justifications that he used to accuse Archrun)
7) OMGUS voting me anyhow



Also, I was saying that I wanted town to lynch Thrawn. In no way should you interpret my post as telling people to stop thinking for themselves and just follow me.
Что?
Shady Sands
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States4021 Posts
August 16 2012 16:31 GMT
#335
In addition to Thrawn, I'm open to a D1 lynch on Ochrow, or JHuyt if that's what it takes to defeat a no-lynch.

Also, GoodKarma, where's your read on the whole discussion about Thrawn? You posted about my call to lynch, and then disappeared.
Что?
DarthPunk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia10854 Posts
August 16 2012 16:38 GMT
#336
I still have 2 pages to go and it is 2.30 am so I will jet through them and may post shorter summaries however;


I have been reading through Thrawn2112's filter. And something jumped out at me.

thrawn2112

Thrawn throws a FOS on YH.

On August 15 2012 20:54 thrawn2112 wrote:
I also put a FoS on yourharry.

Show nested quote +
On August 15 2012 20:19 DarthPunk wrote:
On August 15 2012 19:58 Shady Sands wrote:
On August 15 2012 19:32 DarthPunk wrote:
On August 15 2012 19:19 Shady Sands wrote:
On August 15 2012 18:45 DarthPunk wrote:
On August 15 2012 18:32 Shady Sands wrote:

I see basically two lines of accusation here.

1) I'm asking a ton of questions and making it look like I'm contributing without actually contributing anything.

2) My two cases on Thrawn and Solar are weak.

In response to 1): First, since it's only 12 hours into D1, there's not much material to work off of. That's why most of the posts have consisted of throwing around questions rather than 400 word case posts. Second, evoking responses, at this stage of the game, is critical. Without a solid base of accusations and counter-accusations in the first half of the day to work off of, there's no way to actually mine enough material to reliably identify and tunnel scum on the second half of the day.


Evoking responses is important, but so is providing analysis and content which you have barely done. Without a solid base of analysis and content (especially that which is not a near fraudulent interpretation of something near meaningless) in the first half of the day to work off of, there's no way to actually mine enough material to reliably identify and tunnel scum on the second half of the day.
There is not much material to work off yet you have encouraged everyone to bandwagon on the back of your interpretation of one post and solars subsequent reactions. (which are far more suspicious than any case on him you have provided.)

On August 15 2012 18:32 Shady Sands wrote:
In response to 2): I'm not certain how you can say your own case on me is any stronger than the cases I've put out on Thrawn and Solar. You seem to imply that since I called out Thrawn for being WIFOM/fluffy, and according to you, I've made more "fluff" posts than he has, then I'm more suspicious. But the case on Thrawn didn't rest on being WIFOM, it rested on the fact that Thrawn led off with an extremely long and odd rant on the SK; the case on Solar likewise didn't rest on that sort of accusation either--rather, it rested on the fact that he was actively being hostile to the town rather than defending himself AND his first post on what the scum was thinking was extremely suspicious.


So my case on you is equally as weak as your cases? Yet you are presenting mine as invalid and yours as valid. The crucial difference between us is I have actually posted substantial cases based on the analysis of large amounts of posts in your filter and have followed the case up with additional content. You twisted near meaningless posts made at the very beginning of day one and have made a huge leap of assumption to even provide anything at all. And have followed that up with nothing further aside from fluff. My case is not nearly as weak as yours.

The cases you made based on those posts were a gigantic stretch at best. Tunnelling these people without providing additional insight or content is harmful to town.


The bigger issue, Darth, is why you are holding me responsible for a lack of analysis and content so far when I've been trying the hardest to get people to commit to reads on people and post more cases. Also, how is this post below:

On August 15 2012 12:01 Shady Sands wrote:
On August 15 2012 11:43 thrawn2112 wrote:
Shady, can you explain your reasoning for initially jumping all over solar? It could be that you, as mafia, know he is town and are taking advantage of solar's emotional reactions by drawing them out even further and immediately sidetracking everyone onto solar's case.

Still waiting for several people to post up... I'm gonna take a break for an hour or so and I will join back in once more people have posted.


Basically I read this:

Imagine how scared of posting you would be if you'd signed up for your first game and rolled Mafia. Your posts would be short, infrequent, and not hold any information that disagrees with the general direction so as not to stand out.


And it didn't make sense to me. Why would Solar make this post if he's town? It's not pro-town to post on which style a scum might or might be playing. Then I read his post in context of the first post that stutters made, and it seemed like Solar is trying to soft accuse stutters--because stutters post was short, and didn't hold any information that disagrees with the general direction (as telling people to read a guide is about as plain as someone can get.)

The second possibility here, aside from soft-accusing stutters, is that Solar is trying to look participatory. He states this himself, later. Why would a townie try to look participatory from his first post onwards? No one has accused Solar of anything yet, so why the desire to look like he's contributing (as opposed to actually saying something of substance instead of guessing at what the scum must be feeling?)

Both these possibilities lead to a scum Solarsail.

## FoS Solarsail


A lack of content and analysis? I note that you didn't include it in your long train of quotes on me, perhaps because it doesn't fit the picture you're trying to paint. So I ask you: How is the above case a bad case? How does it not provide content or analysis?

If you can't find answers to those questions, then I'd respectfully ask you to start applying your own strict standards to YourHarry, who, by your logic, should be a far bigger scum than I am.


I have mentioned that case several times. It is largely based on wild and convoluted assumptions in order to lead to anything meaningful. I have said previously you are either more guilty of the things you are accusing him of or are making assumptions based on a largely innocuous post.

The not all, but the Overwhelming Majority of your posts are fluff. and the Analysis you do present is bad or a stretch. Which begs the question. Why would you be making such absurd stretches in your 'analysis' unless you are serving an agenda?

I will look at Your Harry also. I have only been back for a short while and need to reread the thread. However I find it unusual that you are now, after suspicion has been cast upon you, casting aside your earlier cases without a clear or satisfying reason and trying to shift attention onto Your Harry.


Again, you're saying my analysis is bad or a stretch without stating why they're bad. What's wrong with the case I've posted above? What are the holes? Until you can answer those questions, your case on me doesn't help the town.

Furthermore, I am not casting aside those cases without a clear or satisfying reason. You're framing me for things I haven't done, which is anti-town. I explicitly stated that I'm moving to YH because I find his behavior even scummier than Thrawn's or Solar's. Furthermore, I stated why I think pushing on Thrawn or Solar when they're not in the thread and can't respond won't generate the sort of discussion that ends up helping the town.


I am not framing you for things you haven't done. Why such a melodramatic Defense? You case was bad, because it was based on an assumption and the convoluted scum motivation you presented alongside that assumption. It was a stretch because the assumption you made was a stretch. Your cases bring very little to the table, and unlike XXII you are not confirmed town and cannot get away with such questionable arguments.

You explicitly stated you were dropping the cases on them for now. Why not just move on without saying anything?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

With that being said. I strongly encourage everyone to read Your Harry's Filter It is so ridiculous that I feel bad I didn't jump on it sooner.

@YOUR HARRY acting like you have some sort of outside information to make a PANTS ON HEAD series of posts is very suspicious and unless you have a rock solid excuse for what your filter currently consists of I have a very large;
FoS## Your Harry
On August 15 2012 13:20 YourHarry wrote:
Shady. I guess there is a small chance that I could be wrong. But if I am right, it is not a good idea to reveal this information. Let's move on for now.


It is 100% a good idea to reveal this information right now.


It was this post that most confused me out of all of harry's.

Show nested quote +
On August 15 2012 14:17 YourHarry wrote:
Mkfuba, good question! But not quite correct, I checked my PM before I posted. But you are in the right ball park.

But let's forget everything I said about Solar. I will re-evaluate when more people post.


After re-reading this thread, the 'right ball park' comment immediately caused me to start suspecting harry. It just doesnt seem like something somebody who is town would want to say. It looks like you are trying hint at something without ever saying it, but wouldn't a town player assume that any hints they drop intended for town players might also be picked up on by scum? What ball park are we talking about and why did you say mkfuba's question was a good question?


Show nested quote +
On August 15 2012 12:09 YourHarry wrote:
Did we just catch 2 scums??



Show nested quote +
On August 15 2012 12:09 YourHarry wrote:
Shady, don't leave us. Let's find the third scum.


These posts struck me as a little strange. YH is showing an eagerness, in fact the most eagerness out of anyone, to push a conclusion towards whatever reads (of solar and myself) have been presented, reads which so far people have found weak and/or unsubstantiated.


Thrawn2112 Sheeps Shady and I on YH after the momentum against him had well and truly begun. But note the wording and lack of content or a clear statement in his conclusion. Incredibly wishy washy and adds nothing to the discussion.

His very next post

On August 16 2012 05:27 thrawn2112 wrote:
Concerning the YH topic:

3 possibilities immediately come to mind:

One, that YH is being honest about him thinking that solar and gk are masons. That will explain basically all of his scummy sounding posting earlier in the game. Two, that he and solar are masons. This would explain his strong conviction that solar is town, and could also explain why he posted like he had information to hide. Three, YH and solar, or maybe just YH is scum. This would also account for the cryptic way he was posting. The only part that I'm having trouble with, is that 4 minutes after voting for me for being suspicious of shady, he unvoted me and changed his vote to solar. 21 minutes later is when according to him, he came up with his 'solar as mason' theory and unvoted again. So if YH is scum and solar is scum, why would YH ever vote for solar in the first place? It could be a sneaky manipulation but i doubt that is the case. This makes me believe that no, YH and solar cannot BOTH be scum. YH's quick changing of votes is what I'm currently looking at to see if I can make any reads as far as YH is concerned.

At this point I think YH's alliance hinges on whether or not you believe his story about suspecting solar and gk of being masons. At one point in the game I was willing to indulge the thought that YH and solar were masons based off a weak read I was making, (the extra information YH was hinting at) so it is easy for me to believe that YH did the same. YH, for now I believe your story and do not think either you or solar are scum.

mkfuba07, after reading my post do you agree with my claim that YH is town? If not, why not?


Immediately after his FoS on your harry. He comes up with several WIFOM scenarios to potentially explain YH's behaviour and then reaches the conclusion that not only is your harry no longer suspicious. He is town. What are these conclusions based off? ABSOLUTLEY NOTHING. He then proceeds to immediately push his town read of Your Harry. And when I call him on it? He explains that confirming town is pro-town behaviour. And your harry backs him.
Bear in mind there is absolutely nothing in his post which explain his sudden change of heart.

From FoS to pushing him as 'confirmed town' off the back of nothing whatsoever, directed at someone who had just put a FoS on Your Harry. This is not the same as confirming a townie and yet this is what it was represented as.

Thrawn2112 actively tried to confirm Your Harry's Townieness. Which in the context of the thread and his FoSto town read is incredibly suspicious.

On August 16 2012 11:07 DarthPunk wrote:
Re-reading the thread something Thrawn stated seemed incredibly suspicious.

Show nested quote +
On August 16 2012 05:27 thrawn2112 wrote:
mkfuba07, after reading my post do you agree with my claim that YH is town? If not, why not?


Why are you actively trying to prove that someone is a town? rather than find the scum? what possible town motivation is behind this?

It seems to me like you are trying to convince the one person at that time whom had still expressed doubts on Your harry's alignment to believe that he was town and not scum. This is not pro-town activity. Spending time trying to convince a particular person of a players green status day one is scum behaviour.


On August 16 2012 11:31 thrawn2112 wrote:
@darthpunk
Also it seems to me that confirming somebody is town isn't a waste of time, it will give you new information yo0D

So my case on you is ill have a narrower list of who potential scum could be. While it isn't the most important part of the game it isn't useless like you have described.


He says that confirming a town whom he had just backflipped off for no reason is not a waste of time. Your Harry chips in that establishing himself as town is 'actually advantageous'.

On August 16 2012 13:00 YourHarry wrote:

Establishing someone as confirmed townie is actually very advantageous for town. Masons, for example, are nothing but confirmed townies to each other and can be very powerful, especially in the late game. It is also another reason why scums prefer to NK confirmed townies.

But, of course, it is difficult to establish to 100% confirm townies, just like it is difficult to establish confirmed scums. So I agree that, in the beginning of the game, we should focus more on establishing scum read. But if obvious town read sticks out, we should share it with others. It is scum motivation to do the opposite - to limit as many town reads as possible.


There was no town motivation for establishing Your Harry as town. But there was a scum motivation for protecting one of their own and establishing a scum as town. There was no explanation for Thrawn2112's backflip from FoS to dead set town read in the space of one post.

Vote## Thrawn2112

FoS Your Harry
"If I wanted your opinion, I'd have told you what it was."
marvellosity
Profile Joined January 2011
United Kingdom36160 Posts
August 16 2012 16:45 GMT
#337
On August 17 2012 01:38 DarthPunk wrote:

Vote## Thrawn2112

FoS Your Harry


Please format your votes correctly or THEY WILL NOT COUNT.

Keirathi even posted about it on this page >.<

[15:15] <Palmar> and yes marv, you're a total hottie
Solarsail
Profile Joined July 2012
United Kingdom538 Posts
August 16 2012 16:53 GMT
#338
On Shady:

I was never completely satisfied by his explanation of jumping on me second post to stimulate discussion, nor persisting with it. The encouragement of baseless voting is another strike there for me. None of his suspicions have had sufficient evidence for

On Thrawn:

If Mafia he is playing a clever game presenting very well reasoned arguments with evidence, quite in contrast to Shady. I quite understand his previous position on Archrun as well, lynching semi-lurkers who have not contributed to discussion with their posting. But Archrun has now posted enough so that lynching him on that basis is unacceptable.

However Thrawn and Shady are getting at each other, which is very interesting.

I am satisfied with the defences Thrawn has posted of soft defending me and of being independent from Ochrow's weak argument when FoSing Archrun. People have yet to point out a damning flaw in his arguments.

Here's the summary of the Thrawn case:
1) Lots of soft-defenses of multiple players through the first half of D1
2) Jumping on the Archrun train with poor justification ("non-contributing lurker")
3) Chainsawing a neutral player (Z-Boson) for attacking the player who he used to justify the Archrun FoS (Ochrow)
4) Continuing to FoS Archrun even after he posted content, sheeping Ochrow, the same player who he was defending against Z-Boson
5) Coordinating *all* his reads with Ochrow (including the ones on YH and Solar, the two other contentious players in the game)
6) Threatening to OMGUS lynch me if I don't reread his defense and reconsider my accusations against him (based off the exact opposite justifications that he used to accuse Archrun)
7) OMGUS voting me anyhow


On the basis that Thrawn hasn't done much wrong, this post is unacceptable. 1), 2), 4), 5) have been adequately defending and for Shady to act like they have not been is not moving discussion forward. He should be attacking Thrawn's words and not his actions.

[QUOTE]In addition to Thrawn, I'm open to a D1 lynch on Ochrow, or JHuyt if that's what it takes to defeat a no-lynch.[QUOTE]

[QUOTE]Vote Thrawn2112, FoS Ochrow. Everyone just do it.[QUOTE]

This is also a big mistake. Being happy about lynching someone with little evidence is not town behaviour. If he was still focused on a single target and proving it that would be great, but he needs to lay out a greater case for the other two than what he has. Particularly the Ochrow coordination case is very weak, the Archrun things look independent to me and the reaction to Z-boson's interpretation post was more informational, it needed to be corrected immediately so the thread didn't derail on a misunderstood syntax.

##Vote Shady Sands

Can't shake the feeling that Thrawn has set Shady up as his own worst enemy and Shady is just playing very badly to fall in. DarthPunk is my strongest Town read this far and he is saying the opposite. But I have had so many problems with Shady this game, and while Thrawn is not off my radar I can't ignore this.
Everyone left over is a member of the OP race and you have to figure out which one of them is the least OP. - CosmicSpiral
DarthPunk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia10854 Posts
August 16 2012 16:58 GMT
#339
On August 17 2012 00:00 thrawn2112 wrote:

Whatever happened to your campaign to get everyone posting their previous game filters? Based on what you have done since demanding filters from everyone, I don't see a pro-town motive for your request. Your reasoning in asking for them was that having filters can be very useful in getting reads on people's posts that are made in specific circumstances, such as what a player usually acts like when accused of being scum. After asking for everyone's filters, you haven't even brought the subject back up. What was the point of asking in the first place if you are not going to follow through with analysis? If you wanted to view the filters for your own sole benefit, it would have been way easier for you to just find the filters yourself. If you wanted the group to view the filters so that the town can make better reads, then why haven't you provided any analysis of a player's posting within this game to their posting within previous games? I can't figure out why you asked from them in the first place, which leads me to the conclusion that your filter requests were fluff.

##Vote Shady Sands


This is just... I don't even know. The most hard to read piece of Irony in the thread. If you have a reason to vote Shady why is half your post such garbage? I have made far better arguments against shady and I haven't even voted for him. This is not a case, nor a read, and is certainly not enough to be the none OMGUS part of the post in which you vote for shady. This does nothing to aid in the scumhunting that is occuring. This is Fluff. It is distracting us from being able to clearly read the cases for and against you.

"If I wanted your opinion, I'd have told you what it was."
Solarsail
Profile Joined July 2012
United Kingdom538 Posts
August 16 2012 16:58 GMT
#340
Sorry I missed DP's new post.

That is very strong. I would like to see Thrawn defend that.

Now that DP's argument is there in full with evidence, the line "mkfuba07, after reading my post do you agree with my claim that YH is town? If not, why not?" is really, really out of place.
Everyone left over is a member of the OP race and you have to figure out which one of them is the least OP. - CosmicSpiral
Prev 1 15 16 17 18 19 57 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Online Event
12:30
K-cup France
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EnDerr 60
Vindicta 33
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 30472
Calm 5453
Bisu 3576
Sea 3074
Rain 2695
Shuttle 2407
Horang2 1319
Hyuk 1134
Zeus 779
actioN 569
[ Show more ]
Soulkey 351
Stork 310
Mini 201
Rush 126
Mind 76
TY 61
ToSsGirL 42
JulyZerg 30
Killer 22
Mong 20
SilentControl 20
Sacsri 17
Free 15
soO 12
yabsab 12
GoRush 12
IntoTheRainbow 10
Icarus 8
Bale 5
Dota 2
Gorgc3399
Dendi2093
qojqva2010
Fuzer 280
XcaliburYe264
PGG 65
BabyKnight11
League of Legends
rGuardiaN76
Counter-Strike
olofmeister2998
markeloff735
x6flipin576
edward113
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King130
Heroes of the Storm
XaKoH 20
Other Games
singsing2150
B2W.Neo1457
DeMusliM480
XBOCT479
crisheroes366
Happy260
ToD107
ArmadaUGS71
QueenE63
KnowMe58
Organizations
StarCraft 2
angryscii 38
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Dystopia_ 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 5930
• WagamamaTV575
League of Legends
• Jankos1848
Upcoming Events
Road to EWC
2h 45m
Road to EWC
8h 45m
Road to EWC
19h 45m
Road to EWC
20h 45m
Road to EWC
1d 8h
Road to EWC
1d 19h
Road to EWC
2 days
Online Event
2 days
Clem vs ShoWTimE
herO vs MaxPax
Road to EWC
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

YSL S1
DreamHack Dallas 2025
Calamity Stars S2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL Season 17: Qualifier 1
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025
ESL Pro League S21

Upcoming

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLAN 2025
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.