EPTIn fact, attacking with half your troops is a shit idea cause it's just throwing away half your troops agaisnt anyone who full defends, and throwing away the other half if anyone full attacks you.
Age of Empires: The Age of Kings Mini Mafia - Page 24
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
In fact, attacking with half your troops is a shit idea cause it's just throwing away half your troops agaisnt anyone who full defends, and throwing away the other half if anyone full attacks you. | ||
|
Sir Posts A Lot
Congo42 Posts
Anyways I'm not even interested in this discussion, it's getting off-topic /shrug | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
You're just getting nervous because I'm revealing the truth, the truth about this game and about night actionss. the truth we need to kill tunkeg | ||
|
Sir Posts A Lot
Congo42 Posts
The thing is that you are shifting your argument to make it seem you are right about killing Tunkeg which is why I disagree with you. Anyways, you are more likely in a larger alliance than Tunkeg (and one that's not "outed" as you say it), which is why I think you should be lynched instead. That's my final answer. If someone can show me conclusive proof someone else is in a 4-man alliance then I'll be happy to go vote them. Tunkeg "not being desperate last day" and "making it seem he didn't got a PM" aren't conclusive evidence he's in a 4-man alliance, not even a 3-man one (remember he acted all "everybody hates me" before alliances were even made). | ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
On August 11 2012 08:31 Tunkeg wrote: OK guys here's the deal. I want a strong alliance, with no traitors. No one have PM'ed me yet, and some of the players who have made their prescence in thread known have allready confirmed that they are in PM land. So for those of you who have written in thread since the game started don't bother chosing me for PM partner as I won't speak to you (as I fear you hare plotting with someone else). This means the only PM's I will respond to is: 2 rastaban 4 Bill Murray 6 ItsMarvelBabyyy 8 MrZentor 9 Fulblade 10 Tunkeg 11 [UoN]Sentinel 12 Sinensis List of lurkers in the thread at that point in time. | ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
Anyways, sorry BH, but you are way more of a threat then Tunkeg. ##Unvote ##Vote: Blazinghand | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On August 16 2012 05:31 Sir Posts A Lot wrote: The point is that I actually agree with you, 4-way alliances are very dangerous and we need to kill them. The thing is that you are shifting your argument to make it seem you are right about killing Tunkeg which is why I disagree with you. Anyways, you are more likely in a larger alliance than Tunkeg (and one that's not "outed" as you say it), which is why I think you should be lynched instead. That's my final answer. If someone can show me conclusive proof someone else is in a 4-man alliance then I'll be happy to go vote them. Tunkeg "not being desperate last day" and "making it seem he didn't got a PM" aren't conclusive evidence he's in a 4-man alliance, not even a 3-man one (remember he acted all "everybody hates me" before alliances were even made). But that's hte point! Remember how he acted all "everybody hates me"? REMEMBER THAT? this was at the start of the PM phase. By the end of the alliance phase HE WAS TOTALLY CHILL. That's a MASSIVE CHANGE. MASSIVE. He was arguing about other crap instead of PMs. It wasn't on his mind, he wasn't freaking out, he was fine. What else coupld possibly explain his huge shift in attitude? He obviously developed a PM network and relaxed. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On August 16 2012 05:44 MrZentor wrote: Meh, I thought Sinensis would say something. Anyways, sorry BH, but you are way more of a threat then Tunkeg. ##Unvote ##Vote: Blazinghand why | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On August 16 2012 05:43 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: I think Tunkeg is allied with some of the lurkers in this thread. One - it would make sense by his logic since vets would seek each other out so he'd go and ally with the lesser known players, and this gem: List of lurkers in the thread at that point in time. Why would vets want to work with lesser known players and not other vets? Why is everyone just making random unsubstantiated claims what's going on in this game | ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
| ||
|
Sir Posts A Lot
Congo42 Posts
On August 16 2012 05:45 Blazinghand wrote: But that's hte point! Remember how he acted all "everybody hates me"? REMEMBER THAT? this was at the start of the PM phase. By the end of the alliance phase HE WAS TOTALLY CHILL. That's a MASSIVE CHANGE. MASSIVE. He was arguing about other crap instead of PMs. It wasn't on his mind, he wasn't freaking out, he was fine. What else coupld possibly explain his huge shift in attitude? He obviously developed a PM network and relaxed. Okay then, Tunkeg is allied with just 1 other guy then (he would still be chill in that case, specially if nobody else PMed him previously) Tunkeg->2 man alliance Blazinghand->3 man alliance Is this right then? Why can't Tunkeg be allied with just 1 guy? I don't want to lynch a guy allied to just 1 guy if it means guys in stronger alliances are running free. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On August 16 2012 05:51 Sir Posts A Lot wrote: Okay then, Tunkeg is allied with just 1 other guy then (he would still be chill in that case, specially if nobody else PMed him previously) Tunkeg->2 man alliance Blazinghand->3 man alliance Is this right then? Why can't Tunkeg be allied with just 1 guy? I don't want to lynch a guy allied to just 1 guy if it means guys in stronger alliances are running free. Okay, maybe, but that guy probably has a buddy! that he PMed! And bam instantly you have a 3-person cricular alliance assuming the guy coordinates it. It's SO EASY to make a 2-person alliance in this game, since everyone has a PM. And honestly, if Tunkeg were in a 1-person alliance he'd still show SOME effort to try to draw PMs, not LITERALLY NO EFFORT. He was in the thread and just talking about other shit, after the huge whirlwind of whining earlyer. do you really think he's got 1 ally only? It's certainly possible. And again, I might have 2 allies, but that's not even the strongest way of running things. but I think that tunkeg's actions indicate that he's part of a strong alliance. I think he's been dishonest, and anyone who's afraid of a guy who has 2 allies is jumping to kill off a weaker group instead of a stronger one! There's a better lynch today. | ||
|
Atki Wiglegs
Kiribati11 Posts
##Vote: Tunkeg | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
not that I dont' like the vote on tunkeg though | ||
|
Atki Wiglegs
Kiribati11 Posts
On August 16 2012 06:03 Blazinghand wrote: Wat why would people attack me at night, I'm gonna get lynched tomorrow almost certainly if I'm not lynched today not that I dont' like the vote on tunkeg though A lot of things can change by tomorrow. If people are that scared of you (I don't see why to be honest) then they won't want to wait until tomorrow to lynch you, when scouting could reveal bigger threats, some of the supporting vote players could be killed in night attacks, etc. I think attitudes in this game will be very fickle, and if the people hard-core pushing you really want to see you dead that badly, they'll try to make sure of it tonight, or they might not get another chance. | ||
|
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
##Vote: Blazinghand | ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
On August 16 2012 06:11 rastaban wrote: Hmmm BH, I get the feeling your allies are stacking up in your camp. Look at the lack of reasoning for those votes. Sir Posts A Lot, seems the most clear minded person in this thread. Unlike you and tunkeng he actually is using valid points. ##Vote: Blazinghand I'm sorry you come out of the blue and vote with no support/attack of any actual player, and then complain that the people voting on Tunkeg have no support/attack on other players? That doesn't add up at all. | ||
|
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
On August 16 2012 06:12 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: I'm sorry you come out of the blue and vote with no support/attack of any actual player, and then complain that the people voting on Tunkeg have no support/attack on other players? That doesn't add up at all. Ah but guess what, better yet I get to tie the vote so they both die :D 2 for 1 if you ask me. | ||
|
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On August 16 2012 06:12 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: I'm sorry you come out of the blue and vote with no support/attack of any actual player, and then complain that the people voting on Tunkeg have no support/attack on other players? That doesn't add up at all. It doesn't matter, nobody has any reasoning for any of their votes, yourself included, because nobody seems to care who gets lynched. There are 4 groups of people in here: 1) people who are in tunkeg's camp and voting me and make up crap reasons 2) people who are in my camp and voting tunkeg and make up crap reasons 3) people who have crap reasons and are voting for either tunkeg or me 4) other Look, if you're not in either camp, just think about it LOGICALLY. Tunkeg is the bigger threat. His allies are obfuscating the truth about how the night phase works. Lynch me tomorrow. Please lynch me tomorrow and not today, and lynch tunkeg now. I want my allies to have a chance to win, and if we don't lynch tunkeg, he'll be unstoppable. | ||
| ||
