|
On August 16 2012 06:16 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On August 16 2012 06:12 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On August 16 2012 06:11 rastaban wrote:
Hmmm BH, I get the feeling your allies are stacking up in your camp. Look at the lack of reasoning for those votes. Sir Posts A Lot, seems the most clear minded person in this thread. Unlike you and tunkeng he actually is using valid points.
##Vote: Blazinghand I'm sorry you come out of the blue and vote with no support/attack of any actual player, and then complain that the people voting on Tunkeg have no support/attack on other players? That doesn't add up at all. It doesn't matter, nobody has any reasoning for any of their votes, yourself included, because nobody seems to care who gets lynched. There are 4 groups of people in here: 1) people who are in tunkeg's camp and voting me and make up crap reasons 2) people who are in my camp and voting tunkeg and make up crap reasons 3) people who have crap reasons and are voting for either tunkeg or me 4) other Look, if you're not in either camp, just think about it LOGICALLY. Tunkeg is the bigger threat. His allies are obfuscating the truth about how the night phase works. Lynch me tomorrow. Please lynch me tomorrow and not today, and lynch tunkeg now. I want my allies to have a chance to win, and if we don't lynch tunkeg, he'll be unstoppable.
We are lynching both of you, is that ok?
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
like, i get it if you don't think you should care which one of us gets lynched, but you really really should lynch tunkeg first. Nobody has a chance to win if he can run away with this game. Don't let his allies fool you with their talk of "this isn't a prisoner's dilemma" and "people won't attack". Read the night phase rules. We have to stop the strongest group, or they'll dominate really hard. There's a reason there's a lynch in this game, and it's to balance out the OP groups.
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On August 16 2012 06:17 rastaban wrote:Show nested quote +On August 16 2012 06:16 Blazinghand wrote:On August 16 2012 06:12 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On August 16 2012 06:11 rastaban wrote:
Hmmm BH, I get the feeling your allies are stacking up in your camp. Look at the lack of reasoning for those votes. Sir Posts A Lot, seems the most clear minded person in this thread. Unlike you and tunkeng he actually is using valid points.
##Vote: Blazinghand I'm sorry you come out of the blue and vote with no support/attack of any actual player, and then complain that the people voting on Tunkeg have no support/attack on other players? That doesn't add up at all. It doesn't matter, nobody has any reasoning for any of their votes, yourself included, because nobody seems to care who gets lynched. There are 4 groups of people in here: 1) people who are in tunkeg's camp and voting me and make up crap reasons 2) people who are in my camp and voting tunkeg and make up crap reasons 3) people who have crap reasons and are voting for either tunkeg or me 4) other Look, if you're not in either camp, just think about it LOGICALLY. Tunkeg is the bigger threat. His allies are obfuscating the truth about how the night phase works. Lynch me tomorrow. Please lynch me tomorrow and not today, and lynch tunkeg now. I want my allies to have a chance to win, and if we don't lynch tunkeg, he'll be unstoppable. We are lynching both of you, is that ok?
It's infinitely preferable to just lynching me. I approve, but only if it's impossible to only lynch tunkeg.
|
Ok, so it is over for me now I guess. I hope BH and his friends roflstomp you silly lot and takes this game, just so I can step back into the thread and tell you I told you so. Lynching me over him got to be the most stupid move in a TL Mafia game ever. Look at who is so obvious voting with him. ET is 100% allied with him and so is Atki Wiglegs. I wouldn't be surprised if Its marvel is the last. It is so god damn obvious. And you guys will look so foolish when this poweralliance win this game. It is right in front of you guys, but you guys don't seem to get it. I congratulate the big guns with pulling this game off, even if I tried to warn you.
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On August 16 2012 06:18 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On August 16 2012 06:17 rastaban wrote:On August 16 2012 06:16 Blazinghand wrote:On August 16 2012 06:12 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On August 16 2012 06:11 rastaban wrote:
Hmmm BH, I get the feeling your allies are stacking up in your camp. Look at the lack of reasoning for those votes. Sir Posts A Lot, seems the most clear minded person in this thread. Unlike you and tunkeng he actually is using valid points.
##Vote: Blazinghand I'm sorry you come out of the blue and vote with no support/attack of any actual player, and then complain that the people voting on Tunkeg have no support/attack on other players? That doesn't add up at all. It doesn't matter, nobody has any reasoning for any of their votes, yourself included, because nobody seems to care who gets lynched. There are 4 groups of people in here: 1) people who are in tunkeg's camp and voting me and make up crap reasons 2) people who are in my camp and voting tunkeg and make up crap reasons 3) people who have crap reasons and are voting for either tunkeg or me 4) other Look, if you're not in either camp, just think about it LOGICALLY. Tunkeg is the bigger threat. His allies are obfuscating the truth about how the night phase works. Lynch me tomorrow. Please lynch me tomorrow and not today, and lynch tunkeg now. I want my allies to have a chance to win, and if we don't lynch tunkeg, he'll be unstoppable. We are lynching both of you, is that ok? It's infinitely preferable to just lynching me. I approve, but only if it's impossible to only lynch tunkeg.
just in case Tunkeg has a confederate standing by for a last minute unvote of him and revote of me, could you possibly hang out at the deadline, rasta, and make sure?
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
Tunkeg, you're winning you hat-stitcher. Read the thread
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
when is the deadline for day actions and the lynch?
On August 16 2012 06:11 rastaban wrote:
Hmmm BH, I get the feeling your allies are stacking up in your camp. Look at the lack of reasoning for those votes. Sir Posts A Lot, seems the most clear minded person in this thread. Unlike you and tunkeng he actually is using valid points.
##Vote: Blazinghand
As an aside, Rasta is like 75% certain to be one of tunkeg's allies.
|
On August 16 2012 06:19 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On August 16 2012 06:18 Blazinghand wrote:On August 16 2012 06:17 rastaban wrote:On August 16 2012 06:16 Blazinghand wrote:On August 16 2012 06:12 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On August 16 2012 06:11 rastaban wrote:
Hmmm BH, I get the feeling your allies are stacking up in your camp. Look at the lack of reasoning for those votes. Sir Posts A Lot, seems the most clear minded person in this thread. Unlike you and tunkeng he actually is using valid points.
##Vote: Blazinghand I'm sorry you come out of the blue and vote with no support/attack of any actual player, and then complain that the people voting on Tunkeg have no support/attack on other players? That doesn't add up at all. It doesn't matter, nobody has any reasoning for any of their votes, yourself included, because nobody seems to care who gets lynched. There are 4 groups of people in here: 1) people who are in tunkeg's camp and voting me and make up crap reasons 2) people who are in my camp and voting tunkeg and make up crap reasons 3) people who have crap reasons and are voting for either tunkeg or me 4) other Look, if you're not in either camp, just think about it LOGICALLY. Tunkeg is the bigger threat. His allies are obfuscating the truth about how the night phase works. Lynch me tomorrow. Please lynch me tomorrow and not today, and lynch tunkeg now. I want my allies to have a chance to win, and if we don't lynch tunkeg, he'll be unstoppable. We are lynching both of you, is that ok? It's infinitely preferable to just lynching me. I approve, but only if it's impossible to only lynch tunkeg. just in case Tunkeg has a confederate standing by for a last minute unvote of him and revote of me, could you possibly hang out at the deadline, rasta, and make sure?
yeah, I will be watching how things go down.
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On August 16 2012 06:25 rastaban wrote:Show nested quote +On August 16 2012 06:19 Blazinghand wrote:On August 16 2012 06:18 Blazinghand wrote:On August 16 2012 06:17 rastaban wrote:On August 16 2012 06:16 Blazinghand wrote:On August 16 2012 06:12 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On August 16 2012 06:11 rastaban wrote:
Hmmm BH, I get the feeling your allies are stacking up in your camp. Look at the lack of reasoning for those votes. Sir Posts A Lot, seems the most clear minded person in this thread. Unlike you and tunkeng he actually is using valid points.
##Vote: Blazinghand I'm sorry you come out of the blue and vote with no support/attack of any actual player, and then complain that the people voting on Tunkeg have no support/attack on other players? That doesn't add up at all. It doesn't matter, nobody has any reasoning for any of their votes, yourself included, because nobody seems to care who gets lynched. There are 4 groups of people in here: 1) people who are in tunkeg's camp and voting me and make up crap reasons 2) people who are in my camp and voting tunkeg and make up crap reasons 3) people who have crap reasons and are voting for either tunkeg or me 4) other Look, if you're not in either camp, just think about it LOGICALLY. Tunkeg is the bigger threat. His allies are obfuscating the truth about how the night phase works. Lynch me tomorrow. Please lynch me tomorrow and not today, and lynch tunkeg now. I want my allies to have a chance to win, and if we don't lynch tunkeg, he'll be unstoppable. We are lynching both of you, is that ok? It's infinitely preferable to just lynching me. I approve, but only if it's impossible to only lynch tunkeg. just in case Tunkeg has a confederate standing by for a last minute unvote of him and revote of me, could you possibly hang out at the deadline, rasta, and make sure? yeah, I will be watching how things go down.
I find this acceptable. however, I would also like it if someone besides rastaban who has a vote on me and plans on lynching tunkeg could also be standing by.
I say this because I suspect most of the votes against me are Tunkeg supporters, and there's a strong chance rastaban is one of them, especially given his initial extremely shoddy justification for his vote on me.
I want tunkeg lynched today.
|
Vatican City State135 Posts
As far as I can see it's 6-6, right?
|
On August 16 2012 06:30 ItsMarvelBabyyy wrote:
As far as I can see it's 6-6, right?
Yes, but Sin hasn't voted yet.
|
Sin/Rasta whoever hasn't voted, go for who you think is the biggest threat and in the strongest position.
|
On August 16 2012 06:39 Fulblade wrote:
Sin/Rasta whoever hasn't voted, go for who you think is the biggest threat and in the strongest position.
No, Sin needs to vote no-lynch or vote someone else. There is no reason to we should let either of them make it to the night.
|
Ok well, my opinion (Fulla):
Tunkeg I think whatever happens will be dead by day 2 or end of day 2. I can't see him surviving long. If he does anything but fortify himself/get help tonight he's going to get stomped.
BH I consider smarter, more capable and a resourceful player. 100% in an alliance and a strong one. Although he says just lynch me day 2, I can see him getting out of this and ending up the winning game in the long run.
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
You really think I'm gonna get out of a D2 lynch? please. I'm good, but I'm not that good.
OR AM I????
|
To quote one of my favorite games of all time, "I'm siding with the evil I know over the evil I don't."
That's from Brood War by the way.
I have a feeling both of these guys are in alliances. That much is a given. That much is not being disputed. But I've seen BH play scum before and I've seen BH play town before. I've seen him with lots to hide and I've seen him with nothing to hide. The way he talks now, the self-assurance he has now - that's how he talks when he has little to hide.
Tunkeg I know nothing about. I've never seen him play scum and I've never seen him play town. This is my first game with him. I don't know jack about his style or how he lies.
TL;DR - I'm going to side with my gut and assume BH is not in the big 4-man alliance, but Tunkeg is or at least has a bigger chance of being in it.
|
Apologies for the lack of replies, I've been asleep.
Answers to common questions:
Villagers don't get allocated to build things
Farms don't cost production (only wood)
Everyone has a scout, just name the player you want to scout. They will not know you scouted them.
You cannot produce twice out of the same building in one day (you need multiple buildings for that to work)
|
On August 14 2012 23:02 rastaban wrote:
You mentioned buildings could be one of our production options, are the costs the same as they were in the game?
Yes.
Can our special units be built from the start, if not, do the require castle age? Do they take a special building (castle)
Can't be built till castle age, don't require a building but can only build 1 batch max per day.
If you have multiple buildings of the same type it costs only one production choice to produce out of all of them. E.g. If you have two barracks you can produce units out of both (two batches) for one production choice.
Deadline in a little over an hour. Not sure where one of my cohosts is so I'll try to get that votecount out ASAP.
|
Day 1 Votecount
Tunkeg (6)
Blazinghand
Bill Murray
[UoN]Sentinel
EchelonTee
ItsMarvelBabyyy
Atki Wiglegs
Blazinghand (6)
s0lstice
Fulblade
Tunkeg
Sir Posts a Lot
MrZentor
rastaban
Sinensis
MrZentor
Sinensis has not voted.
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
Well, everything seems to be looking ok. Let's just make sure nothing weird happens between now and deadline, eh? If sinensis shows up he should throw his vote on Tunkeg or not vote at all.
I don't suppose anyone is around who wants to listen to a final hour plea on why we need to kill tunkeg and not me this turn?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
