|
On August 10 2012 09:05 JingleHell wrote:Show nested quote +On August 10 2012 09:01 marvellosity wrote:
hmm. DT stuff I don't quite get.
Should we just lynch zeph or glasse instead
Glasse especially for his annoying "I'm playing like a dick, but I refuse to stop playing like a dick even though I'm telling everyone I'm playing like a dick" attitude Right now we don't have a DT. We have what could easily be a fakeclaim. If it's a scum who's already a high visibility potential lynch, even grabbing one more mislynch for them before dying would be huge. Without having more information about the claim, I feel safer going into a scummy target. What did you think about my Dropula case?
Well he's not a "high visibility potential lynch" candidate. He's just not what I'd call a townie straight from the books either. So far noone mentioned him as a lynch candidate if I'm not mistaken.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
could someone explain to me clearly and succinctly in one post what 'claim' we've had, by who, who it's fingering, and what it means. Lazy yes but it would be extremely helpful
|
On August 10 2012 09:07 marvellosity wrote:
could someone explain to me clearly and succinctly in one post what 'claim' we've had, by who, who it's fingering, and what it means. Lazy yes but it would be extremely helpful
Well, the whole problem is that it's a claim by proxy via mason, saying that Talis is red. He's a decent town read for a fair number of us, and we don't know who's claiming it, which restricts us knowing what it means.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
who's a decent town read? i'm literally asking for all the basics here or at least the post I can find it without trawling.
thx <3
|
Toad masoned X.
X claims a "Mafia Goon" check on me.
Other bits:
X claims to have received my character info in his check as well. Still waiting from host confirmation if this is possible.
X knew Toad's character info and role.
Unclear if X has also checked toad but seems implied.
Implications:
I am either scum or miller or town, depending on whether you think X is DT or scum.
See my earlier post for a rundown of lynch scenarios as they pertain to lylo.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
|
On August 10 2012 09:07 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On August 10 2012 09:05 JingleHell wrote:On August 10 2012 09:01 marvellosity wrote:
hmm. DT stuff I don't quite get.
Should we just lynch zeph or glasse instead
Glasse especially for his annoying "I'm playing like a dick, but I refuse to stop playing like a dick even though I'm telling everyone I'm playing like a dick" attitude Right now we don't have a DT. We have what could easily be a fakeclaim. If it's a scum who's already a high visibility potential lynch, even grabbing one more mislynch for them before dying would be huge. Without having more information about the claim, I feel safer going into a scummy target. What did you think about my Dropula case? Well he's not a "high visibility potential lynch" candidate. He's just not what I'd call a townie straight from the books either. So far noone mentioned him as a lynch candidate if I'm not mistaken.
So how'd you end up masoning him, then?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
wait, we don't even know who this person is?
this is ludicrous
|
On August 10 2012 09:13 marvellosity wrote:
who the fudge is X?
you, for all I know.
|
noone in this game has a townread on Talis lol
|
On August 10 2012 09:13 marvellosity wrote:
who the fudge is X?
And that succinctly covers why not many people are voting based on it. We all have the same question. Toad is withholding the info.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
i'm not lynching talis based on a DT check from a mystery person through another non-confirmed person
is this chinese whispers mafia or soemthing?
|
On August 10 2012 09:14 JingleHell wrote:And that succinctly covers why not many people are voting based on it. We all have the same question. Toad is withholding the info.
well yeah because I was asked to.
If the guy tells the truth we can get way more out of it with this proxy.
I could tell another mason to mason him so that he can get the next read the next cycle. If the mason lies the DT can just claim, I can confirm the DT and we found ourselves a mafia-mason after already finding mafia-Talis.
Telling the name doesn't really change a thing.
|
On August 10 2012 09:14 Toadesstern wrote:
noone in this game has a townread on Talis lol
well jingle and hopeless1der at least agree with me on VE.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 10 2012 09:16 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On August 10 2012 09:14 JingleHell wrote:On August 10 2012 09:13 marvellosity wrote:
who the fudge is X? And that succinctly covers why not many people are voting based on it. We all have the same question. Toad is withholding the info. well yeah because I was asked to. If the guy tells the truth we can get way more out of it with this proxy. I could tell another mason to mason him so that he can get the next read the next cycle. If the mason lies the DT can just claim, I can confirm the DT and we found ourselves a mafia-mason after already finding mafia-Talis.
Telling the name doesn't really change a thing.
jesus christ, are you scum?
A DT check's reliability isn't based on the trustworthiness of the person in question?
????????
|
On August 10 2012 09:14 marvellosity wrote:
i'm not lynching talis based on a DT check from a mystery person through another non-confirmed person
is this chinese whispers mafia or soemthing?
I mentioned it. I'm not saying we should lynch him based on that either and should ignore it right now because there's no way to know if it's really a DT. Not even for me so I guess we agree.
|
And for the record, Toad, I've had one for several (real) days, based on reasons I chatted with him about in skype. He doesn't feel scum motivated to me. He's not afraid to change his mind with a reason, he's not afraid to tunnel with conviction.
Unless he's got some amazing scum meta I don't know about, I really got a townie impression out of him. Also, if he was scum, he probably wouldn't have convinced me to drop Erandorr with good persistent logic... you know, the guy people got mislynched yesterday?
|
On August 10 2012 09:16 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On August 10 2012 09:14 JingleHell wrote:On August 10 2012 09:13 marvellosity wrote:
who the fudge is X? And that succinctly covers why not many people are voting based on it. We all have the same question. Toad is withholding the info. well yeah because I was asked to. If the guy tells the truth we can get way more out of it with this proxy. I could tell another mason to mason him so that he can get the next read the next cycle. If the mason lies the DT can just claim, I can confirm the DT and we found ourselves a mafia-mason after already finding mafia-Talis. Telling the name doesn't really change a thing.
wtf is this lol?
how do you expect to tell another mason who the DT is in private? How would you know that that mason wasn't scum?
|
On August 10 2012 09:17 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On August 10 2012 09:16 Toadesstern wrote:On August 10 2012 09:14 JingleHell wrote:On August 10 2012 09:13 marvellosity wrote:
who the fudge is X? And that succinctly covers why not many people are voting based on it. We all have the same question. Toad is withholding the info. well yeah because I was asked to. If the guy tells the truth we can get way more out of it with this proxy. I could tell another mason to mason him so that he can get the next read the next cycle. If the mason lies the DT can just claim, I can confirm the DT and we found ourselves a mafia-mason after already finding mafia-Talis.
Telling the name doesn't really change a thing. jesus christ, are you scum? A DT check's reliability isn't based on the trustworthiness of the person in question? ????????
well if the red check is against the #1 or at least #2 scumread in the game I don't really see how the name makes much of a difference.
|
EBWOP: "one" being a townread on Talis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
