EPTDBZ Mini Mafia - Page 8
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
ghost_403
United States1825 Posts
| ||
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
| ||
|
ghost_403
United States1825 Posts
How do you feel about starting with Grush? | ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
 | ||
|
BioSC
United States636 Posts
| ||
|
ghost_403
United States1825 Posts
On July 25 2012 01:32 BioSC wrote: Hello all, Glad to see people posting and all. With regards to roleclaiming: + Show Spoiler + Not all of the above red roles will be in the game. In fact, three won't be. Hmm... This line makes me not want to. It's heavily implied that the "Scum" team have fake claims. As to claiming power levels (base/max/whatever) I'm also hesitant about that. Leaving the strategy of switching votes at the last minute to me feels like giving mafia more control over the lynch. What if they all have really high base powers? What if there are other mechanics involving power levels with their characters? Honestly, sticking to good old fashioned scumhunting and accountability jazz will probably be the way to handle voting/lynching. This is a really empty post. I can certainly understand being lost or disoriented with this kind of vote mechanic, but that's not what I'm seeing here. Instead, he's just stating the obvious, and taking a long time to do it. And look at how he ends this post: completely neutral and unhelpful. He's not trying to figure out what's going on in this game, he's trying to blend in. @hiro: What do you think about going to war with him? | ||
|
BioSC
United States636 Posts
| ||
|
ghost_403
United States1825 Posts
| ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
On July 26 2012 00:07 ghost_403 wrote: In that case, I'm declaring myself the Minister of War, and I'm thinking we should start with BioSC, because of stuff like this: This is a really empty post. I can certainly understand being lost or disoriented with this kind of vote mechanic, but that's not what I'm seeing here. Instead, he's just stating the obvious, and taking a long time to do it. And look at how he ends this post: completely neutral and unhelpful. He's not trying to figure out what's going on in this game, he's trying to blend in. @hiro: What do you think about going to war with him? I don't see really anything scummy with that post. It'd be nice to hear him talk about some of the people in this game, though. I'm more interested in MajuGarzett. On July 25 2012 00:58 MajuGarzett wrote: That just discourages different viewpoints. How would that be good while trying to scum hunt? He comes in and asks a question, which is useless and then proceeds to afk. He doesn't offer his opinion on either of the plans suggested in the thread or stick around to make any responses. This is the same type of empty posting that he showed in Bastard 2 as mafia - remember how the only thing he did night 0 was ask what benefits he could gain and cast some light doubt. Contrast to something like LVI as town, where he has no problem making opinions or saying what he thinks personally. Also, I'm ditching my plan. There's no way it can get implemented when we have 3 people not posting and another 3 who said they won't follow it. | ||
|
BioSC
United States636 Posts
On July 26 2012 00:18 ghost_403 wrote: @bio: So what are your thoughts now? You still against the vote switching plan, or you want to just treat this like a normal game? Who do you think we should be lynching today? I'm against the vote switching plan. Based on the activity level so far in this game, it would be really hard to have everyone on board anyways. Grush, Maju, Kenpachi, and Fulla have yet to post any large amount, with only Maju posting since the game started. I'm also not liking Michaelthe's nonchalance with day1 lynches. It's fine to not like the random plans that we come up with, but to seriously think rolling a dice and voting at random helps at all is crazy. His only contribution to the game so far is the vote on Sinensis. For lynch targets, I would be ok with either him or Maju. There are a few people coasting by this game with bare minimum posts, him being one of them. Grush, Kenpachi, and Fulla all haven't posted anything, and I would rather not waste a lynch on someone who's in line to be replaced/modkilled. That being said, should they come back and not contribute, I would be more than happy to start charging my PL. | ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
##Vote MajuGarzett | ||
|
ghost_403
United States1825 Posts
On June 30 2012 15:50 MajuGarzett wrote: How was that confirmation bias? And how have so many people voted on so little evidence. DBZMM: On July 25 2012 00:58 MajuGarzett wrote: That just discourages different viewpoints. How would that be good while trying to scum hunt? I really don't see any difference between these two posts. | ||
|
BioSC
United States636 Posts
##Vote MajuGarzett | ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
On July 26 2012 00:34 ghost_403 wrote: TLM LVI: DBZMM: I really don't see any difference between these two posts. Look at his posting right after that. Does he disappear? No, in his very next post he responds to BM and says that his reasoning is poor. | ||
|
ghost_403
United States1825 Posts
| ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
On July 26 2012 00:48 ghost_403 wrote: @hiro: So? He didn't disappear in Bastard Mafia 2, where he rolled scum. I see his absence in the thread as being a null tell. eh, true. | ||
|
heist
United States720 Posts
There are essentially 4 lurkers: grush57, Fulla, Kenpachi, MajuGarzett. I was considering voting for one of them, but there's simply no information on them. grush57 - is useless and tends to lurk no matter his alignment. Possible modkill anyways. Kenpachi - I don't think a veteran like him would choose to purposefully lurk through all of day 1. Reserve judgment. Fulla - despite his initial enthusiasm, not a single post. Don't know what to think. Possible modkill anyways. MajuGarzett - has one question. I'm frankly not seeing the connection between this single action here and his play from the other game. Ghost you said it in your post, his absence in the thread is a NULL TELL. Null tell for all of them. A better target for me is TheMichael. This is my impression: Sinensis is a slightly confused, overeager townie. Sinensis' plan is a flop and his vote on ghost is honestly irrational and based on fluff. In other words, he's the perfect easy target for scum. Sinensis was the easiest target, just really setting himself up at that point in the game. TheMichael jumps on him immediately with a counter vote. I've tried to prod him on his one real post of substance, and frankly I don't like his response. He doesn't care who dies and implies that he's really really weak in Power Level. He is the most suspicious one to me so far, and I'll be putting my vote on him. ##Vote: TheMichael | ||
|
Fulla
United Kingdom519 Posts
Since you get stronger from lynching I might as well lynch someone for now. Cancel or change later. ##Vote: Kenpachi Please PM people who haven't made a post yet? They might not have noticed the rename | ||
|
iGrok
United States5142 Posts
Welcome to the game, sorry about the confusion! | ||
|
MajuGarzett
Canada635 Posts
I agree with heist about themichael's play. He says he just wants to lynch someone randomly. Though he says he would rather lynch for information he is one of the first people to vote before much time has passed and info can be gathered. Also choosing completely randomly is unlikely. He should have at least had some reason for sinensis such as that sinensis had already voted so his lynch would give info. Michael just disregards all logic and votes for whomever he pleases. ##Vote: TheMichael | ||
| ||
