When are you planning on starting this game?
Edit: I will not be replaced.
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
When are you planning on starting this game? Edit: I will not be replaced. | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
On June 22 2012 16:46 rastaban wrote: Just caught up on what is the "haps", here are my thoughts. First, I agree with the Millers claim day one, and policy lynching all Millers after today. In a game where they are self aware it is a huge boon for town. The benefits far out way the negative of less people with possible blue roles. First and most importantly it guarantees our checks. Detectives know any red checks from non-mafia get lynched, since sanity isn't an issue in this game. Any Mafia will always claim miller if checked and we don't force a day 1 reveal. It will cause a lot of confusion, it is best to eliminate this by forcing day one claims. It also forces Mafia's hand, if they want to claim they have to do it now before they are in too much water. This is hard for mafia to do, they don't want to be scrutinized and that is why they claim miller as a last resort. While it is argued that Millers make it easier to snipe blues it also makes our blues more effective. Look at Bang Bang where I, as a doctor, pushed strongly for a miller claim night one. Second, the focus of Marv makes me think of karma after seeing him do it to Gonzaw in our last game together. We need to be careful with tunneling though, when you push someone so hard day1, they will often come across as scum no matter what since the only content you have is them trying to defend themselves against accusations. He could be scum but I just want to say that we need to be cautious, as I feel the case against him is a bit biased. Now his day 1 "meta" is to spam 1 liners so I personally wouldn't mind him getting lynched if there isn't a better candidate but I feel like there is too much discussion on him this early in our day. Remember we have 48 hours, half that time hasn't even passed yet so I don't like the band wagoning on Marv so quickly. That said I have a hard time getting anything from his filter right now. Some people analyze best when their quarry is under pressure but for me that introduces too many variables so I like to read posts where they aren't defending themselves. So marv would you mind answering the original question ( as leading as it may be) about what you feel are your tells, and second who do you feel is most likely scum? His post a huge ball of fluff. The miller issue has already been argued to death, and everyone except Zephirdd agrees that millers should claim during D1. The second section consists of him arguing that it's dumb to tunnel players (marv in particular). In the end of it he says "Remember we have 48 hours, half that time hasn't even passed yet so I don't like the band wagoning on Marv so quickly." which initially makes him appear pro-town, but in reality it's just bullshit. What do you mean with the band-wagoning on marv going quickly? He just had 3 votes on him by the time you were writing this (2 now) and the only guys who seems very intent on lynching him is VE and Probulous (risk's vote looked more like a pressure vote). I mainly see scum posting unnecessary advice like this where they encourage everyone to be calm and collected when voting and not to rush things, especially when there isn't even any real bandwagoning going on. @Snarfs What do you mean with when you say that MrZentor tried to correct his errors in the recent WBG mini mafia? Did he play even worse before that? In EMM he only posted one-liners, and he could have been either scum or town; it was impossible to read him. | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
What do you mean | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
That case is extraordinarily weak. You could've summed it up in one sentence: "risk.nuke has not yet posted anything of value.". The part about him switching his vote is not a scum tell, and what had happened was that ten more hours passed without VK posting anything. It's just a simple pressure vote. | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
For today's lynch I suggest rastaban. His cautious first post is scummy, and his case on risk.nuke is scummy as well. ##Vote rastaban | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
On June 24 2012 03:17 Zephirdd wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2012 18:08 marvellosity wrote: I'm not sure how you can play mafia Zeph if it feels fabricated to you. It means you have no pulse at all on the psychology and emotion in a game, and therefore I really don't know how you can even try to play successfully :/ AtE much? Show nested quote + On June 24 2012 01:49 risk.nuke wrote: rastaban zephirdd and zentor, what are your thoughts on eachother? rastaban sounds like town with bad cases. Zentor sounds trollish and uninterested, usually a signal of a VT(because VT is indeed an uninteresting role) or a scum(with the intention of creating confusion in the thread and wasting discussion). IMO, Zentor sounds like a good day 1 lynch atm. ##Vote MrZentor Can you explain why rastaban sounds like town? Because when I looked at Bang Bang I didn't really see any similarities with his play in this game. At least no similarities that you wouldn't expect from the same player regardless of alignment, anyway. How did you go from thinking that rastaban was your best scum read to thinking that he is town? All you said was this: On June 23 2012 04:47 Zephirdd wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2012 04:25 slOosh wrote: Rastaban looks townish to me; the main case against him right now looks like "he is playing bad", rather than "he is playing like scum". Something in the back of my mind is still clicking everytime I read Snarfs. Can you cool cats reread his last post and tell me your thoughts? It would be great to get some discussion particularly from marv, prplhz and risk.nuke. And as for now here will be my preliminary vote to hold me accountable. ##Vote: Snarfs All I read from his last post is "there is no difference between Zentor and risk.nuke". The only way this would be a scum tell if risk was scum. idk, snarfs looks null to me. Well, the most glaring scum tell so far(for me) is rastaban, but if you think about it he's just playing as his town meta(based on bang bang) and all he's done is a bad case, not a scummy case. Since he is "the most glaring scum tell so far" for you, you must've surely seen some clear signs pointing toward him being town when you read Bang Bang Mafia for you to believe that he is town. | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
Good post. I am growing suspicious of him as well. That's why I questioned him here. I don't know if we have enough time or enough people to lynch him, but I think I'd rather have him lynched than rastaban or Zentor. | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
On June 24 2012 05:48 Zephirdd wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2012 03:29 Shraft wrote: On June 24 2012 03:17 Zephirdd wrote: On June 23 2012 18:08 marvellosity wrote: I'm not sure how you can play mafia Zeph if it feels fabricated to you. It means you have no pulse at all on the psychology and emotion in a game, and therefore I really don't know how you can even try to play successfully :/ AtE much? On June 24 2012 01:49 risk.nuke wrote: rastaban zephirdd and zentor, what are your thoughts on eachother? rastaban sounds like town with bad cases. Zentor sounds trollish and uninterested, usually a signal of a VT(because VT is indeed an uninteresting role) or a scum(with the intention of creating confusion in the thread and wasting discussion). IMO, Zentor sounds like a good day 1 lynch atm. ##Vote MrZentor Can you explain why rastaban sounds like town? Because when I looked at Bang Bang I didn't really see any similarities with his play in this game. At least no similarities that you wouldn't expect from the same player regardless of alignment, anyway. How did you go from thinking that rastaban was your best scum read to thinking that he is town? All you said was this: On June 23 2012 04:47 Zephirdd wrote: On June 23 2012 04:25 slOosh wrote: Rastaban looks townish to me; the main case against him right now looks like "he is playing bad", rather than "he is playing like scum". Something in the back of my mind is still clicking everytime I read Snarfs. Can you cool cats reread his last post and tell me your thoughts? It would be great to get some discussion particularly from marv, prplhz and risk.nuke. And as for now here will be my preliminary vote to hold me accountable. ##Vote: Snarfs All I read from his last post is "there is no difference between Zentor and risk.nuke". The only way this would be a scum tell if risk was scum. idk, snarfs looks null to me. Well, the most glaring scum tell so far(for me) is rastaban, but if you think about it he's just playing as his town meta(based on bang bang) and all he's done is a bad case, not a scummy case. Since he is "the most glaring scum tell so far" for you, you must've surely seen some clear signs pointing toward him being town when you read Bang Bang Mafia for you to believe that he is town. Maybe I should have explained it better. I said it was "the most glaring scum tell" because there wasn't anything else at the time. In the same post, I say that it's probably just a bad case. From what I've read, he is looking similar to his BangBang2 meta. similar. This much I already get. What I am interested in is what made you jump from glaring scum tell to town. If it's a meta argument it must be something very indicative so that you can be sure of his alignment, right? I mean, how can you be so sure of him being town just because of some similarities? I believe that every player acts in a (somewhat) similar way in every game, regardless of alignment. I'd like you to elaborate more on what made you think rastaban is town, if you please. Something more specific than just the general "there are some similarities". | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
And what the fuck is this? On June 25 2012 07:51 risk.nuke wrote: Rastaban if you really are townie (which I don't think you are) you dodged a lynch last night and seeing how we mislynched a townie that makes the situation even worse for you. My point is if you don't want to die soon you should do something more usefull then dumb shit tunneling. He would've tried to dodge the lynch regardless of his alignment, why do you act as if it is a scum tell? | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
I'm not trying to make something out of nothing. The issue with that post is that he takes something that is a null tell and says that it makes rastaban look even scummier. The reason that I brought up that he unnecessarily defended is because he mentioned it in bypass in this post where he said he wanted MrZ to explain himself. He says "He spends half of his posts unnecessarily defending himself and the other half is useless 1-worders.". You're right on the lurker lynching part, he never explicitly says "I want to lynch lurkers". I took it for granted that he had said something along those lines after reading someone else's post about risk, quite likely this post by VE, but now, after looking through his filter, I realised that he hadn't. The closest thing he's said would be that he was too lenient on lurkers before, which clearly isn't the same thing. risk.nuke is a null tell for me right now. Can you explain why you have a town read on him? | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
On June 26 2012 00:33 marvellosity wrote: :/ I've swung around again. I really think VE is scum, or actually quite possibly SK. I'm making my town tell on his emotion to a null tell. He proved in LI he can get all 'emotional' as scum. Firstly I just can't get over the way he pushed me. Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 07:14 VisceraEyes wrote: Let's try and figure out a way to figure out if we're town right here and right now... :/ Because it's going to help me a lot if I can trust you. I now know you're a fucking beast as scum. What do you suggest? Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 09:20 VisceraEyes wrote: This was his defense in LV, the Zim themed large we were just in. Marv DOMINATED that game as scum, and look at what his first act of the game was (upon replacing in)! It was using his "meta" as a personalized defense against my accusations. Look at his defense this game! Oddly enough, it's a personalized "meta" defense again! Marv, your response? Ok, so we've established he thinks I'm totes amazing scummer. It makes absolutely no sense to me how he thinks someone as good at scumplay as I am would get myself into this situation. xscsc summarised it quite nicely: Show nested quote + On June 25 2012 22:17 xsksc wrote: Again, I'm gonna have to disagree with my predecessor here. People, including him, were pointing out that the way that you answered the question, and the argument following it, didn't make sense for a townie. However, it really doesn't make sense for scum either. Any remotely decent scum player is going to put 10x the thought into how they answer questions regarding their alignment and would never have answered that way, it draws wayyyyy too much negative attention, for no gain. I don't think you handled it the best way, but I think people need to realise that a bad play does not equal scum. This is the crux of it, and xcksc hasn't even seen my scumplay, but he understands. Yet VE who saw me trash town in LIV and LV as scum does not see it. Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 09:51 VisceraEyes wrote: I don't underestimate you, which is why I know scumMarv wouldn't think twice about side-stepping the question. Take it as a compliment, not an affront. This doesn't add up. Clearly sidestepping Matt's question WAS NOT the correct scumplay. Just look at what's happened. There's a mental disconnect going on. Show nested quote + On June 23 2012 00:21 VisceraEyes wrote: There are differences marv. For instance, townMarv is interested in finding scum. scumMarv is interested in lynching townies. Also, both townMarv and scumMarv are good enough to realize that I'm very obviously town in this game, so the fact that you're calling me "dodgy" still (not scummy, not scum, not suspicious, not suspect....."dodgy") just confirms that you're not interested in finding scum today. For that, you're gonna die friend. Sorry. *shrug* First paragraph is just trite, it says nothing. He's just explaining the wincon for a townie and scummer. I commented before on the 2nd part. Calling me out for finding him scummy, calling himself town. It's manipulative. Show nested quote + On June 23 2012 07:11 VisceraEyes wrote: Like, honestly. Marvel is much better than this. He knows that me targeting him if he's town does not automatically make me scum. This is literally the DEFINITION of OMGUS. He literally just said "I know I'm town, so because VE is targeting me, he's scum" and has fabricated some kind of fantasy to justify calling me such. Marv is definitely my preference for lynch. He knows better. He's acting like he doesn't, but he does. When I accused him before, I wasn't calling him scum because I was town. I'd said I had the perspective of 100% knowing I was town that others did not. I simply did not say he was scum because he was accusing me. Twisted my words. On the day 1 lynch: Realising he's not gonna get me through, he turns his attention to Zentor. Subsequently: Show nested quote + On June 24 2012 04:54 VisceraEyes wrote: risk do you think that scum only lurk? Because you're really only pushing people who aren't likely to push back. :/ Marv do your own meta research. I'm also feeling strange about the ease of this lynch. I also don't want to lynch Zentor. Can we lynch either risk or prpl? maybe Marv? This is where it all gets odd. He doesn't want to lynch Zentor, and lists 3 other people. Who doesn't he name? The other leading candidiate, rastaban. He is realistically the only alternative, but nothing. Compare - slOosh was trying really hard to get people to switch from Zentor to rastaban, but VE? nothing. Let's see if VE ever talks about rastaban: Show nested quote + On June 23 2012 08:26 VisceraEyes wrote: @Snarfs Yeah, I'm null on rasta. He looks pretty townie to me too, but to be fair I've only skimmed the cases on him. I'll go read them in earnest and let you know what I think. This is it. Nothing else. He never lets us know what he thinks of the alternative lynch candidate, despite promising to, and despite saying he didn't want to lynch Zentor. It's a half-assed, not-real attempt. Show nested quote + On June 24 2012 05:16 VisceraEyes wrote: Actually prpl, that post was good. I'm cool with a Zeph lynch if we can make that happen. Except VE never tries to make ANYTHING happen. He says this and disappears. I also feel like his pushing of prplhz is a sham. He came straight from LV where two townies pushed hard for a policy lynch on a player they disliked. He should know this isn't a scumtell. But it looks good to push someone on wanting a policy lynch like that, doesn't it? Conclusion: All his scumhunting is a sham. He knows and states I'm an excellent scum player, but somehow then thinks I would come into this game as scum and play scummily. He twists my words. He never talks about rastaban despite promising to, despite saying he didn't want to lynch Zentor and rastaban being the main alternative. In fact he never pushes any alternative. Pushes prplhz because it's an easy thing to do. I think VE is scum (or SK :D) I don't see how the first section of your case has anything to do with VE being scum. You acted scummy by not answering Mattchew's question straight. The way I see it, you have no reason whatsoever to not answer the question as honestly and precise as you can as town. Refusing to answer the question properly is anti-town, and anti-town play is something that favours scum, regardless of your explanation that you play scummier as town. Your explanation that it wasn't the correct scum play does not satisfy me. You couldn't know beforehand which option (answering the question properly/avoiding it) would benefit you more, as explaining exactly how you play as scum can also be a huge detriment to your team. So, there are two possibilities: 1) You're an anti-town acting townie. 2) You're scum who didn't think you'd catch this much shit for not answering his question. Irrespective of which explanation is the more likely one, I don't see how VE pressuring you for this is incriminating at all. It's more of a town tell to me. Regarding the part where he says that you are OMGUSing, he does twist your words (but only a little). I don't think it says much. What you are saying in your post is akin to OMGUSing, but with a bit more reasoning behind it. This post by VE is a null tell. I do think you make a fair point with the last part of your case. VE voting to lynch Zentor in spite of him saying that he doesn't want to lynch him is scummy. He has given his explanation on this, saying that he was busy doing IRL stuff and didn't have the time to make an effort to try to sway the lynch (the only other viable target without some serious pushing was rastaban). I don't like IRL-excuses, but I don't think that this point alone is enough to warrant a VE lynch. | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
On June 26 2012 11:42 Probulous wrote: marvellosity Marvel started this game in an open manner by offering to answer any question asked of him but he was suprised by Mattchew's question and responded rashly. This in itself is not a scum tell, an off balance townie could do the same. But his subsequent insistence on not responding is damning in my eyes. + Show Spoiler [Marvs initial reaction] + On June 22 2012 07:19 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 07:19 VisceraEyes wrote: On June 22 2012 07:16 marvellosity wrote: On June 22 2012 07:14 VisceraEyes wrote: Let's try and figure out a way to figure out if we're town right here and right now... :/ Because it's going to help me a lot if I can trust you. I now know you're a fucking beast as scum. What do you suggest? you may quiz me and i will answer your questions. TOWN God, that was easy. Who's next? .........what kind of questions? Obviously that's what I meant marvel LOL well, that part of the figuring out bit I thought I'd leave to you. On June 22 2012 07:29 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 07:22 Mattchew wrote: Hi All, I want MrZentor dead. On June 22 2012 07:16 marvellosity wrote: On June 22 2012 07:14 VisceraEyes wrote: Let's try and figure out a way to figure out if we're town right here and right now... :/ Because it's going to help me a lot if I can trust you. I now know you're a fucking beast as scum. What do you suggest? you may quiz me and i will answer your questions. Marv, if you were to pick out the differences in your scum play and your town play, what would you point to? I like this question a lot. I think there are a couple of possible tells. But tell me what you think first. On June 22 2012 07:31 VisceraEyes wrote: The point of the self-evaluation was to see if you left anything out - obviously we can go and look for ourselves Marv, and we'll have our own opinion...but for you to turn the question around and ask for his answer first is incredibly scummy and immediately forces me to not trust you. On June 22 2012 07:32 marvellosity wrote: lol, ok dear. If people could look for themselves, then maybe just one person in the whole of LV and the obsQT might have had a tingling suspicion, no? No. Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 07:34 marvellosity wrote: On June 22 2012 07:31 VisceraEyes wrote: The point of the self-evaluation was to see if you left anything out - obviously we can go and look for ourselves Marv, and we'll have our own opinion...but for you to turn the question around and ask for his answer first is incredibly scummy and immediately forces me to not trust you. count how many times anyone said i said or even hinted at anything scummy in LV see the pressure i was under at the start in magic at the start for wanting to shoot NT off the bat compare to current situation profit This is the key quote and one I keep coming back to. He has turned his initial confused response into a positive proof he is town. Why? This was very early day 1, VE had labelled him scum but VE always does this early and changes his position regularly. The simplest way to clear your name would be actually answer the question. Instead he uses the fact that he is acting scummy to try and clear his name, thus avoiding the work. Again, I can see a flustered scum here not sure how to respond so early in the game to this kind of pressure. So he decides to try and use that pressure to clear his name rather than doing the hard work and answer the question. It isn't easy playing a different meta than you are used to so if he could deflect the question he could continue to play his normal game. I am not marvellosity so I can't say whether he would respond the same way if he were scum or if he were scum, simply because I think he was caught off guard. All I can do is compare him to what I would expect a town or scum would do. I would expect a townie to say something like "Shit that's a hard question, give me some time to think about it" if he was thrown off balance. + Show Spoiler [My first response to Marv] + On June 22 2012 08:40 Probulous wrote: Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 08:29 VisceraEyes wrote: Votes = Tools. Not going over this again this game. Fair enough, I forgot who I was asking. You did back off Marv pretty quickly though. Why? I mean this is terrible and you pointed it out Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 07:30 VisceraEyes wrote: On June 22 2012 07:29 marvellosity wrote: On June 22 2012 07:22 Mattchew wrote: Marv, if you were to pick out the differences in your scum play and your town play, what would you point to? I like this question a lot. I think there are a couple of possible tells. But tell me what you think first. SCUM Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 07:31 VisceraEyes wrote: The point of the self-evaluation was to see if you left anything out - obviously we can go and look for ourselves Marv, and we'll have our own opinion...but for you to turn the question around and ask for his answer first is incredibly scummy and immediately forces me to not trust you. He still hasn't responded adequately. He is around note Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 08:17 marvellosity wrote: VE, prplhz last played with Zentor in WoF. Enough said really. But is he isn't bothering to actually answer Mattchew's question. So yeah, why the let up? Marv, I want that alimony! Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 08:44 marvellosity wrote: Probey, you'll have to get in touch with my lawyer. And I have at least partly answered the question, you're just not on the ball enough to have worked it out yet. By now he is adamant that he won't respond to the question. It has not become a case of being flustered but a concious decision. When I join in the questioning, he dismisses me. He fobs me off with a "go read the thread" response. This attitude of not wanting to contribute and making others do the work is scummy. It's sarcastic and designed to rile me up. He did a similar thing to VE. Why would you respond in this manner if you were town? The tone is designed to piss people off. Remember marvel has chosen to act this way. He believes that by playing a scummy game he can appear town. That is his whole exlpanation at this point, so if he is scum it makes sense to piss people off. He can create confusion and a massive shitfest which ruins day 1. He clearly doesn't think he will get lynched, he say so later. VE, picks up on the tone issue in his next post. + Show Spoiler [VE] + On June 22 2012 08:51 VisceraEyes wrote: Yeah let's lynch marv. Prob you down? ##Vote: marvellosity Hubris does NOT become you sir. and I point out the ridiculousness of not answering the question + Show Spoiler [Probulous] + On June 22 2012 08:54 Probulous wrote: Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 08:44 marvellosity wrote: Probey, you'll have to get in touch with my lawyer. And I have at least partly answered the question, you're just not on the ball enough to have worked it out yet. Show nested quote + count how many times anyone said i said or even hinted at anything scummy in LV see the pressure i was under at the start in magic at the start for wanting to shoot NT off the bat compare to current situation Why are you so cryptic? It's your job to prove you're town so you should want to provide information to us. ##Vote marvellosity This time it's personal @Mattchew, you have nothing to say ![]() By now Marv's play is clear, refuse to answer clearly and then use his scummy play as an excuse. He has already gained two votes which would normally force a townie to actually contribute but he doesn't. Why? because this is his plan. He wants to look scummy and then go "hey look I always look scummy as town". Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 08:55 marvellosity wrote: it's not cryptic, it's blindingly fucking obvious. jesus christ Why the indignation here? Why is he is pissed off at both VE and myself for not realising that he is town because he looks like scum. It is a ridiculous premise so of course we want further explanantion. Then VE comes up with the defensive nature of marvel's posting which marvel used as his defense. the way I read this, VE is simply stating that Marv is using his defensive posting as an excuse for palying scummy. + Show Spoiler + On June 22 2012 09:20 VisceraEyes wrote: :OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Anyways look what I found guys! Show nested quote + On May 30 2012 06:16 marvellosity wrote: On May 30 2012 06:16 VisceraEyes wrote: Marvel, the correct response is "my thoughts are X and Y and Z"...my question of you wasn't an accusation, so there's no need to get defensive. Saying things like "I already said" and "I made a comment" are very defensive when all I wanted was your input. :/ Much like Magic you are reading my responses as defensive when they were not. I'm just baffled you are asking questions I have already stated clear opinions on or at least alluded to. This was his defense in LV, the Zim themed large we were just in. Marv DOMINATED that game as scum, and look at what his first act of the game was (upon replacing in)! It was using his "meta" as a personalized defense against my accusations. Look at his defense this game! Oddly enough, it's a personalized "meta" defense again! Marv, your response? On June 22 2012 09:23 marvellosity wrote: I'm supposed to talk about someone else in my defence? And in the nested quote it states quite clearly there weren't any accusations... that's twice this game now you've misrepresented something, wilfully or not. i'm watching you Whether there are accusations or not is irrelevant. The point is you were using your defensive behaviour as a way to prove you're town. We cannot know this is true, there is no way of verifying it. Just because you were defensive in your last townie game does not mean if you are defensive here you are townie. ESPECIALLY if you use that as your defense. Again, surely a townie would just answer the original question clearly and transparently at this point. I mean both VE and myself were "obviously mistaken", but you didn't bother to clear that up did you? No the confusion was good, it was serving its purpose. + Show Spoiler [back and forth] + On June 22 2012 09:42 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 09:20 VisceraEyes wrote: :OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Anyways look what I found guys! On May 30 2012 06:16 marvellosity wrote: On May 30 2012 06:16 VisceraEyes wrote: Marvel, the correct response is "my thoughts are X and Y and Z"...my question of you wasn't an accusation, so there's no need to get defensive. Saying things like "I already said" and "I made a comment" are very defensive when all I wanted was your input. :/ Much like Magic you are reading my responses as defensive when they were not. I'm just baffled you are asking questions I have already stated clear opinions on or at least alluded to. This was his defense in LV, the Zim themed large we were just in. Marv DOMINATED that game as scum, and look at what his first act of the game was (upon replacing in)! It was using his "meta" as a personalized defense against my accusations. Look at his defense this game! Oddly enough, it's a personalized "meta" defense again! Marv, your response? This is the second misrepresentation. Trying to compare a 'defence' in a game where I wasn't accused to my defence this game where I am in fact accused First misrepresentation: Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 07:34 marvellosity wrote: here's a clue count how many times anyone said i said or even hinted at anything scummy in LV see the pressure i was under at the start in magic at the start for wanting to shoot NT off the bat compare to current situation profit Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 08:57 VisceraEyes wrote: Probulous, what did you see when you went back and read Magic? When I went back, all I saw was a completely different opening strategy. I mean, he could just be doing a fast-expand or something, but it's looking kinda cheesy to me. :/ I clearly said what I was referring to in Magic and yet you try to pretend that you went and looked and didn't find anything. Despite the fact I said exactly what I was referring to. On June 22 2012 09:44 VisceraEyes wrote: Marv, I find myself to be terribly entertaining, so you're going to have to surround that statement with some sort of context if you want me to understand what you mean. Now, my argument isn't about you defending yourself for the same reason. My argument is that you're defending yourself in the same fashion...using meta. You're encouraging everyone to leave the thread and go read other games. Why? On June 22 2012 09:46 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 09:44 VisceraEyes wrote: Marv, I find myself to be terribly entertaining, so you're going to have to surround that statement with some sort of context if you want me to understand what you mean. Now, my argument isn't about you defending yourself for the same reason. My argument is that you're defending yourself in the same fashion...using meta. You're encouraging everyone to leave the thread and go read other games. Why? one was a defence, one was not. do you see yet? i didn't encourage people to leave the thread to read other games. i said i never said anything scummy in LV and I pointed out explicitly the scummy thing I was pressured for in magic. the whole original question was on meta, and now you're pushing me for defending on meta? really? I think VE got sidetracked here. Marv using meta is not a problem. As he states, the question was about meta. The point is that stating that "when you look scummy you are town" is not a useful use of meta. It doesn't answer the question and allows you to just refuse to answer. A useful meta point would be "when I am scum I tend to ..." not when I am scum I look like town. Anyway, I want you to note that he has now created a case against VE based on him being misrepresented twice. This will come up later. This is a pretty good post from VE which is clearer than his previous ones. Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 09:47 VisceraEyes wrote: On June 22 2012 09:42 marvellosity wrote: On June 22 2012 09:20 VisceraEyes wrote: :OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Anyways look what I found guys! On May 30 2012 06:16 marvellosity wrote: On May 30 2012 06:16 VisceraEyes wrote: Marvel, the correct response is "my thoughts are X and Y and Z"...my question of you wasn't an accusation, so there's no need to get defensive. Saying things like "I already said" and "I made a comment" are very defensive when all I wanted was your input. :/ Much like Magic you are reading my responses as defensive when they were not. I'm just baffled you are asking questions I have already stated clear opinions on or at least alluded to. This was his defense in LV, the Zim themed large we were just in. Marv DOMINATED that game as scum, and look at what his first act of the game was (upon replacing in)! It was using his "meta" as a personalized defense against my accusations. Look at his defense this game! Oddly enough, it's a personalized "meta" defense again! Marv, your response? This is the second misrepresentation. Trying to compare a 'defence' in a game where I wasn't accused to my defence this game where I am in fact accused First misrepresentation: On June 22 2012 07:34 marvellosity wrote: here's a clue count how many times anyone said i said or even hinted at anything scummy in LV see the pressure i was under at the start in magic at the start for wanting to shoot NT off the bat compare to current situation profit On June 22 2012 08:57 VisceraEyes wrote: Probulous, what did you see when you went back and read Magic? When I went back, all I saw was a completely different opening strategy. I mean, he could just be doing a fast-expand or something, but it's looking kinda cheesy to me. :/ I clearly said what I was referring to in Magic and yet you try to pretend that you went and looked and didn't find anything. Despite the fact I said exactly what I was referring to. I "pretend" that I went and didn't find anything? I went and looked and I said EXACTLY what I found. I don't care about you wanting to shoot NT, nothing similar has happened this game to compare it to. When I went back, I found what I was looking for - you acting like a townie. You haven't done that this game. When I went and looked at your scum game, I found something there too - you defending yourself needlessly with meta. You HAVE done that this game. These aren't misrepresentations, they're observations I'm making. If you don't like it, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO GO READ YOUR PREVIOUS GAMES. The point being, answer the original question clearly and transparently if you don't want people to misunderstand your reply. At this point it is clear that marv has achieved a few things. He has the thread focused on him, he looks scummy but is using this to try and prove he is town, he has created some suspicion on VE. So I call him out on it. Show nested quote + Which is a nothing answer. I guess that is fair enough at this point. This next post is another key one.On June 22 2012 09:47 marvellosity wrote: On June 22 2012 09:46 Probulous wrote: @Marv, do you think VE is scum? I think he's pushing me dodgily. Haven't worked out if it's scummy or VE just being VE yet. Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 09:50 marvellosity wrote: On June 22 2012 09:47 VisceraEyes wrote: On June 22 2012 09:42 marvellosity wrote: On June 22 2012 09:20 VisceraEyes wrote: :OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Anyways look what I found guys! On May 30 2012 06:16 marvellosity wrote: On May 30 2012 06:16 VisceraEyes wrote: Marvel, the correct response is "my thoughts are X and Y and Z"...my question of you wasn't an accusation, so there's no need to get defensive. Saying things like "I already said" and "I made a comment" are very defensive when all I wanted was your input. :/ Much like Magic you are reading my responses as defensive when they were not. I'm just baffled you are asking questions I have already stated clear opinions on or at least alluded to. This was his defense in LV, the Zim themed large we were just in. Marv DOMINATED that game as scum, and look at what his first act of the game was (upon replacing in)! It was using his "meta" as a personalized defense against my accusations. Look at his defense this game! Oddly enough, it's a personalized "meta" defense again! Marv, your response? This is the second misrepresentation. Trying to compare a 'defence' in a game where I wasn't accused to my defence this game where I am in fact accused First misrepresentation: On June 22 2012 07:34 marvellosity wrote: here's a clue count how many times anyone said i said or even hinted at anything scummy in LV see the pressure i was under at the start in magic at the start for wanting to shoot NT off the bat compare to current situation profit On June 22 2012 08:57 VisceraEyes wrote: Probulous, what did you see when you went back and read Magic? When I went back, all I saw was a completely different opening strategy. I mean, he could just be doing a fast-expand or something, but it's looking kinda cheesy to me. :/ I clearly said what I was referring to in Magic and yet you try to pretend that you went and looked and didn't find anything. Despite the fact I said exactly what I was referring to. I "pretend" that I went and didn't find anything? I went and looked and I said EXACTLY what I found. I don't care about you wanting to shoot NT, nothing similar has happened this game to compare it to. When I went back, I found what I was looking for - you acting like a townie. You haven't done that this game. When I went and looked at your scum game, I found something there too - you defending yourself needlessly with meta. You HAVE done that this game. These aren't misrepresentations, they're observations I'm making. If you don't like it, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO GO READ YOUR PREVIOUS GAMES. I've quite clearly stated I am not, stop it. The similar thing, VE, is that I wasn't afraid of saying something that was scummy in that game. In this game, unless you underestimate me which I think you do not, you should be aware that I know making a sidestep to Mattchew's question could be viewed scummily, and I'd avoid it like the fucking plague if I were scum. Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 09:52 marvellosity wrote: Don't be an idiot. Why would I let myself in for this (fairly predictable, even if how long and hard it has continued was not) when I didn't have to? Use your noggin. So now the plan becomes clear. He was caught off guard early and made a response he would not normally make as either town or scum, but here he is saying the he would avoid it like the plague is he were mafia. But apparently not as town? It makes less sense from a town perspective to not answer a straight up question than it does from a mafia point of view. Mafia get away with causing a shitstorm knowing they are unlikely to be lynched. Why? Because he can fall back on his meta showing that he is careful as mafia. Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 09:52 marvellosity wrote: Don't be an idiot. Why would I let myself in for this (fairly predictable, even if how long and hard it has continued was not) when I didn't have to? Use your noggin. Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 09:54 VisceraEyes wrote: See, the funny part is that you could ask yourself the same question. Why would you put yourself in this situation as town? It doesn't make any fucking sense. Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 09:56 marvellosity wrote: a) because i'm unafraid b) because i get information from who and how i'm pushed Here we have the reveal that this was all a townie plan by Marvel to gain information on those pushing him. Really, well what has he gained so far? That VE may or may not be scum...That's it. In the process he has caused the whole thread to be entirely focused on him. Worse he doesn't regret it. He thinks it is a good idea. At this point we have had no other cases presented, no other scumhunting. Nothing. How is that a positive for town? Anyway I outline my position here + Show Spoiler [probulous position] + On June 22 2012 09:58 Probulous wrote: Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 09:47 marvellosity wrote: On June 22 2012 09:46 Probulous wrote: @Marv, do you think VE is scum? I think he's pushing me dodgily. Haven't worked out if it's scummy or VE just being VE yet. See here is what I don't understand.
Why haven't you answered the original question? You admitted it's a good question, you claim VE is misrepresenting you but isn't scum so surely the best way to clear your name would be to outline exactly what you intended when you briefly referenced those games. I mean you seem to be saying that VE is mistaken but don't bother to actually take the time to thorughly correct the mistake. Why? Because you don't want to answer the question. Townies want to provide data and clarity and you just wanted to move onto other things. Has Matt just left the thread then? >< On June 22 2012 10:17 Probulous wrote: 1) You proactively ask people to question you so you can prove your alignment. Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 07:16 marvellosity wrote: you may quiz me and i will answer your questions. 2) Then you dilberately obfuscate and avoid answering the question Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 07:29 marvellosity wrote: On June 22 2012 07:22 Mattchew wrote: Marv, if you were to pick out the differences in your scum play and your town play, what would you point to? I like this question a lot. I think there are a couple of possible tells. But tell me what you think first. Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 07:32 marvellosity wrote: lol, ok dear. If people could look for themselves, then maybe just one person in the whole of LV and the obsQT might have had a tingling suspicion, no? No. 3)You explain that this was not a mistake but instead part of an elaborate plan to do something no scum would do and so therefore prove you are town Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 10:05 marvellosity wrote: "The similar thing, VE, is that I wasn't afraid of saying something that was scummy in that game. In this game, unless you underestimate me which I think you do not, you should be aware that I know making a sidestep to Mattchew's question could be viewed scummily, and I'd avoid it like the fucking plague if I were scum." If you are town, you are saying that you deliberately avoided answering Mattchew to cause a shitstorm to prove you're town? You don't say it was a mistake, or a joke but rather a calculated plan. You give yourself too little credit Marv. I think you're scum who tried to joke off a difficult question and didn't expect people to latch onto it. Now you are backpedalling as fast as you can. To which I get this enlightening response Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 10:19 marvellosity wrote: wrong way of looking at it Prob if I were scum I'd have thought more before answering matt's question. even if this conversation has been quite interesting WHY? Better yet why would you not do this as town. Especially after everyone starting piling onto you. Saying you are careful as scum is not a perfect defense that excuses you from participating. Note up till now he has provided nothing else. He hasn't pushed a case or done anything of value except defend himself with I am smart as scum so I wouldn't do that. I give you the perfect marvel plan. Play badly and then claim you have perfect scum play so you cannot be scum. TLDR: marvel was caught off guard by Mattchew's question and chose to throw it back to the thread. This in itself could be a town response but when he told us that his scummy behaviour made him town, he hit on a plan to ensure he wasn't lynched. He knew his initial response was inadequate but chose to use his scummy response as a tool to cause confusion and shit up the thread. By never taking the multiples chances he had, to clarify his original position, he ensured that the mess continued for as long as possible. Whenever VE or I pushed him to contribute he could just reply with his meta defense that he cannot be scum because scum would never do this. If we believe that, then we would never lynch anyone. If he had just stated the truth, that he responded rashly and would take the time to provide a proper answer, I would have dropped this case. But his insistence that it takes up as much of Day 1 as possible makes me believe he is mafia. ##Vote marvellosity The case is has a clear focal point and is so long, so I'll just address it all at once rather than commenting each section. If you want elaboration on some point, just tell me and I'll comment on it when I am not half-asleep. I outlined in my previous post that I think his insistence to not answer is anti-town. As you pointed out, it is even scummier when he tries to turn it into a proof that he is town. The town way to deal with the situation would be to answer as well as you could, if not initially, then at least once you realise that you're attracting suspicion and shifting the focus away from productive discussion. I just don't see the town motivation behind marv's course of action, and I think that your case makes sense. ##Vote marvellosity | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
Here's a short list that describes Snarfs' posting in EMM (where he was mafia) quite accurately:
Here are Snarfs' post game thoughts: On June 20 2012 07:14 Snarfs wrote: + Show Spoiler [Rest of his post] + GG guys. Thanks to the hosts ![]() First scum game and I was not kidding when I said it was way more stressful for me than town T_T. I kept looking back at things I was saying and kicking myself for saying them. Wish I could have done better, but I already feel like this experience will help my future scum play... that's kinda why I just wanted the game to end, time to move on and do better in the next one! Artanis, you were way too damn towny. Stop that! But I don't know why you guys convinced yourselves I wasn't scum based on my meta. I'd never played scum before... there was no meta to compare ![]() Ghost properly calling out the fact that I'd asked people for previous games but never referenced them was one of those "Oh fuck" moments for me. Fortunately, noone else brought that up again... Hyaach, sorry for pushing your lynch when you'd done nothing scummy. I actually felt really bad T_T. I'm not cut out for scum life haha. Honestly, I spent way more time on this game than my posting reflects. Many times I'd spend a couple hours reading the thread and writing out a post, only to delete it and turn my laptop off because I didn't want to stick my head out. Rookie scum mistakes like that will be improved upon for next time and are my biggest takeaway. Anyways, fun game nonetheless. Thanks again wbg, HiroPro and ET. I compared Snarfs' play in EMM (where he was scum) to his play in WoF MM (where he was a vigilante), and I found some differences:
I think that it's too early to guess his alignment based on meta in this game, but his play looks more like his town meta to me. The way he presents his case on Zephirdd doesn't seem like his conservative scum play in EMM. However, it could just be him adapting his scum play according to his post game thoughts in EMM, which makes me quite uncertain. Conclusion: Snarfs is still a null tell to me. I spent one hour researching his meta, but it didn't make me any more certain on his alignment. ._. | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
If you cared to look up EMM, you'd see the exact same pattern. I am usually quite hesitant with lynches unless I got a strong scum read, and I don't put my vote down right off the bat. I don't use my vote like VE does. I wait until I'm content to vote for someone, and then I put my vote and let it be, barring any major events. Like I said, if you actually cared to read my previous game, you'd understand that I play this way. This part of your case is also interesting: On June 27 2012 04:40 prplhz wrote: Next is the current marvellosity wagon, we talked about it for ages but he is hesitant with his vote. He only votes after Probulous makes his big case. Earlier he said that the question-answer-thing was a bit scummy but it wasn't worth lynching marvellosity over, but now he is using that very same argument for voting for marvellosity! I also think it's very telling that he is actually saying that marvellosity is scum for saying that his own behavior is town. Why would any townie ever say that his own play is scummy when it is townie by definition? Townies think that everything they do is the towniest shit ever (even when it isn't which is surprisingly often). I'd like you to point out just where I said that. What I really said was "You acted scummy by not answering Mattchew's question straight. The way I see it, you have no reason whatsoever to not answer the question as honestly and precise as you can as town.". I never even mentioned anything pertaining to lynching marvellosity in this post, and before that I hadn't even commented on him. You're also twisting my words when you say that I'm that marvellosity is scum for saying that his own behavior is town. I said that it was scummy that he somehow turned his anti-town behaviour into some proof that he was town. This part is such an overexaggeration that it's almost scummy. On June 27 2012 04:40 prplhz wrote: He is also keen to point out how tired and drunk he is all the time, like he's trying to apologize for his play. Scum are a lot more prone to apologize for their game because, unlike townies, they're not actually trying their best and they don't see their game as inherently good! I have two posts relating to this: here and here. They are also referencing the same day (today), and since chose to not sleep the previous night and instead stay up to read and comment on Probulous case, it's certain that it's not just some bullshit excuse. The only point of your case that is actually factual, and not some kind of twisting of my words or overexaggeration to make me look scummy, is that I said it's probably too late to sway the lynch. I don't think that's very strange considering that almost all discussion today has been on marvellosity, and not one strong case has been presented on any other player. Other than marvellosity, most players seem to disagree on lynch targets. If you want to lynch me based on my hesitance on the marvellosity lynch, then go ahead, but don't come with bullshit lies in order to paint me up as scum. | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 27 2012 01:57 GMT
#1035
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 27 2012 02:09 GMT
#1055
##Unvote ##Vote Mattchew | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 27 2012 02:27 GMT
#1069
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 27 2012 09:54 GMT
#1149
Because he doesn't to me, and VE said that prplhz usually looks incredibly towny when he plays town. I'm starting to believe that he is scum... It's mostly just OMGUS and meta, but still. | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 27 2012 12:21 GMT
#1155
On June 27 2012 12:45 VisceraEyes wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2012 15:07 Mattchew wrote: On June 25 2012 12:00 wherebugsgo wrote: What the fuck Truth + Show Spoiler [Probulous post] + On June 25 2012 14:40 Probulous wrote: Mattchew You started the whole Marvel thing and given his incredibly vague response why is this all you have to say about him Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 13:42 Mattchew wrote: On June 22 2012 07:29 marvellosity wrote: On June 22 2012 07:22 Mattchew wrote: Hi All, I want MrZentor dead. On June 22 2012 07:16 marvellosity wrote: On June 22 2012 07:14 VisceraEyes wrote: Let's try and figure out a way to figure out if we're town right here and right now... :/ Because it's going to help me a lot if I can trust you. I now know you're a fucking beast as scum. What do you suggest? you may quiz me and i will answer your questions. Marv, if you were to pick out the differences in your scum play and your town play, what would you point to? I like this question a lot. I think there are a couple of possible tells. But tell me what you think first. I dislike this answer greatly. The entire reason I asked was because of how strong your scum play has been recently, and that seemingly no-one (especially in this game) could finger you as scum. I was looking for an answer that would leave me with things to hold you accountable for. Instead, you dodge the question completely. On June 22 2012 09:50 marvellosity wrote: On June 22 2012 09:47 VisceraEyes wrote: On June 22 2012 09:42 marvellosity wrote: On June 22 2012 09:20 VisceraEyes wrote: :OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Anyways look what I found guys! On May 30 2012 06:16 marvellosity wrote: On May 30 2012 06:16 VisceraEyes wrote: Marvel, the correct response is "my thoughts are X and Y and Z"...my question of you wasn't an accusation, so there's no need to get defensive. Saying things like "I already said" and "I made a comment" are very defensive when all I wanted was your input. :/ Much like Magic you are reading my responses as defensive when they were not. I'm just baffled you are asking questions I have already stated clear opinions on or at least alluded to. This was his defense in LV, the Zim themed large we were just in. Marv DOMINATED that game as scum, and look at what his first act of the game was (upon replacing in)! It was using his "meta" as a personalized defense against my accusations. Look at his defense this game! Oddly enough, it's a personalized "meta" defense again! Marv, your response? This is the second misrepresentation. Trying to compare a 'defence' in a game where I wasn't accused to my defence this game where I am in fact accused First misrepresentation: On June 22 2012 07:34 marvellosity wrote: here's a clue count how many times anyone said i said or even hinted at anything scummy in LV see the pressure i was under at the start in magic at the start for wanting to shoot NT off the bat compare to current situation profit On June 22 2012 08:57 VisceraEyes wrote: Probulous, what did you see when you went back and read Magic? When I went back, all I saw was a completely different opening strategy. I mean, he could just be doing a fast-expand or something, but it's looking kinda cheesy to me. :/ I clearly said what I was referring to in Magic and yet you try to pretend that you went and looked and didn't find anything. Despite the fact I said exactly what I was referring to. I "pretend" that I went and didn't find anything? I went and looked and I said EXACTLY what I found. I don't care about you wanting to shoot NT, nothing similar has happened this game to compare it to. When I went back, I found what I was looking for - you acting like a townie. You haven't done that this game. When I went and looked at your scum game, I found something there too - you defending yourself needlessly with meta. You HAVE done that this game. These aren't misrepresentations, they're observations I'm making. If you don't like it, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO GO READ YOUR PREVIOUS GAMES. I've quite clearly stated I am not, stop it. The similar thing, VE, is that I wasn't afraid of saying something that was scummy in that game. In this game, unless you underestimate me which I think you do not, you should be aware that I know making a sidestep to Mattchew's question could be viewed scummily, and I'd avoid it like the fucking plague if I were scum. I don't like your grasping at straws to use "im smarter than doing something so scummy" as a defense. If you knew it would look scummy, why would you do it? It serves no town purpose to act willfully scummy. Show nested quote + On June 23 2012 04:10 Mattchew wrote: On June 23 2012 02:36 Snarfs wrote: Also, I'm still waiting for Mattchew to come back and explain this: On June 22 2012 15:23 Snarfs wrote: Mattchew, you claim that you had hoped that marv would write down some things that he does as mafia so that you can hold him accountable, yet it just appears as though the most likely thing that will happen is, if marv is scum, he will become more cognisant of his flaws as mafia and be more likely to attempt to avoid them. It seems like you didn't fully think that question through. I figured that of all people he would have more insight as to his differences and tells in his scum/town play, he would have the most information. It was extremely early in the game and was what I thought a good time to go into a self meta analysis that if he were town, he would gladly bestow upon us the things that he would use to set himself apart from scum. Instead, he sidesteps the question completely, not leaving us with anything to hold him accountable or help us get a read on him. Then he says that he knew this answer would be viewed as scummy, which if something is scummy, it is anti-town. I don't see why he would post like that knowing it would not help town. From my reading it sounds like you think he is scum. You are certainly not happy with his reply. Which begs the question, if you are unhappy with his response but don't bother writing up a case, why ask the question? In fact you have nothing else to say about marvel at all. Then when you do push a case it is this terrible excuse for a vote on rastaban Show nested quote + On June 23 2012 04:10 Mattchew wrote: On June 22 2012 16:46 rastaban wrote: Second, the focus of Marv makes me think of karma after seeing him do it to Gonzaw in our last game together. We need to be careful with tunneling though, when you push someone so hard day1, they will often come across as scum no matter what since the only content you have is them trying to defend themselves against accusations. He could be scum but I just want to say that we need to be cautious, as I feel the case against him is a bit biased. Now his day 1 "meta" is to spam 1 liners so I personally wouldn't mind him getting lynched if there isn't a better candidate but I feel like there is too much discussion on him this early in our day. Remember we have 48 hours, half that time hasn't even passed yet so I don't like the band wagoning on Marv so quickly. That said I have a hard time getting anything from his filter right now. Some people analyze best when their quarry is under pressure but for me that introduces too many variables so I like to read posts where they aren't defending themselves. So marv would you mind answering the original question ( as leading as it may be) about what you feel are your tells, and second who do you feel is most likely scum? (big post by post case on Risk.Nuke that I am not quoting) On June 23 2012 03:47 rastaban wrote: When I review MrZentor I see someone who hasn't contributed much, which, while scummy, isn't enough to lynch yet in my opinion.,Especially when he commits to delivering something tomorrow. I have seen players like Foolishness say the same thing so I am inclined to give him till tomorrow before I make my Judgment on him. This all feels extremely middle of the road, I am ready to jump on a bandwagon but don't want to commit to anything scum play. He also contradicts himself about the talks about Marv, then contradicts his we have 48 hours post, by posting a case that he is pretty deadset on, about risk.nuke. Overall I just feel like Rastaban's posting has been flaky and his case on Risk is bad. To answer his question to the thread, I read his vote switch that he was not confident in a Marv lynch, and that he wanted to pressure a lurker with no content. Also, his first 30ish hour case doesn't take into account that Risk.nuke has played many many games before. ##Vote: rastaban Wishy washy and bad cases do not a scum make. Rastaban may be scum but if all he has done is be wishy-washy and push a bad case, he may be bad town as well. Of course you then jumped back onto your policy lynch of Zentor. What really confuses me is this Show nested quote + On June 24 2012 06:04 Mattchew wrote: On June 24 2012 04:54 prplhz wrote: Okay I wanted to write a case on Zephirdd last night but then I really had to sleep and I've been busy today but here we go. On June 22 2012 08:41 Zephirdd wrote: This is a semi-closed setup. If there are 13 players, it's possible that 12 are medics and 1 is a scum. Of course that's retarded as fuck, but nothing is concrete and we shouldn't think "but it's not common to 2 of X" exist ever. at all. In fact, we can't even confirm the existence of a SK until after the night phase. I'm not sure about Millers instaclaiming. While it clears path for cops(as it's pretty obvious that they will show red), it also reduces the number of possible blues, making it easier for scum. At least what I understood from the setup is that Millers can't be blues. If anything, Millers should be breadcrumbing and claiming in case a cop calls them guilty. For all other purposes, they should be *Vanilla*(unclaimed, aka. possible blue) to make it harder for mafia to shoot into blues. This is the post in question. People have already said that this is a bad plan and I agree with that. My problem isn't that he's suggesting a bad plan. it's that I think it comes from a scum perspective. Scum are much more likely to suggest plans that they think are bad for them. For scum, it doesn't really matter if millers claim or not but what Zephirdd focuses on is how it will make them confirmed green and not blue. Zephirdd thinks that that will narrow down the pool of potential blues that scum can shoot which will be a plus for scum. Townies would never focus on this because they don't really care about blues, they care about analysis and avoiding chaos and that's what miller claims will help them avoid. This is really the crux of my case but I'm going to write some more that might convince other people too. First Zephirdd is pretty suspicious about rastaban. Worst case ever into doesn't feel like your other games. He never does anything. Next he has an epiphany that VisceraEyes and marvellosity are scum and again he doesn't do anything about it. No vote, no push, no anything. He looks pretty convinced from what he is saying but he's not acting on it. In the end he jumps on the zentor wagon as the 9th voter, an ultra safe vote based off of two lines of analysis that has already been made several times by other people. What you guys think about this? what exactly are you trying to do with this? save your scum teammate zentor with a no-lynch? When prpl was the guy who started the whole thing. Your play is substandard mattchew. The only case you have pushed has been Rastaban which is not revealing at all. What happened the crazy bastard who fake claimed a hit in LV? Can I say "the weekend happened" (work into happy hour into NYC debauchery friday, graduation BBQ party saturday, NY Red Bulls game sunday)? Also, I fail to see how my thoughts on Rastaban are bad? Those reasons help push a scum agenda while showing a fear of posting in the thread. Prplhz's post on zeph came at a really suspicious time. He may as well have asked for a no-lynch because if his case had actually gained traction, thats what would of occurred considering the time and players available. I answered Snarfs question because it was asked of me. The discussion I believe had shifted away from Marv and he was no longer a lynch candidate. I don't believe that posting anything further about Marv would have helped town at that time. I will however be posting more on him in the next 24 hours while we discuss lynch candidates. I am attempting to post more concisely and be less annoying this game then usual due to complaints in past games. When I wake up tomorrow I want to do a big post explaining my scum reads. You may all hold me accountable for doing so and the reads that I present. For now I am going to sleep after a long weekend. Mattchew lynch is a go guys. On June 27 2012 12:53 VisceraEyes wrote: If you're town, your death isn't necessarily the end of the game for town. Appeal to emotion AND fear simultaneously while you're at it. I'm sorry if you're town, but I don't think you are. Get over it. I wonder why he suddenly chose to unvote him. | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 27 2012 23:54 GMT
#1314
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 28 2012 00:37 GMT
#1317
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 28 2012 01:54 GMT
#1319
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 28 2012 02:23 GMT
#1321
On June 28 2012 11:06 wherebugsgo wrote: Think about it from this perspective (this is all I'll say on the matter): If in a normal situation a cop died and didn't provide checks would you ask whether the cop used his actions? Obviously not. So what difference is there in this situation? What does the knowledge that a cop used his action give you? It's not like knowing that will tell you who he used his action on. I'd be dead certain (unless the player is a mental case) that he used his night action. This means that I can look through his posts and try to discern who he checked. Now, being uncertain that he even checked someone, I can't do that. Anyway, this subject is more fit for post game discussion, but thanks for trying to explain your answer. I understand that it is a hard thing to do when you are the host of a game that is still going on. I'd be happy to hear more of your thoughts behind your decision once the game is over. | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 28 2012 05:03 GMT
#1322
On June 23 2012 03:47 rastaban wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2012 03:19 Snarfs wrote: On June 23 2012 03:08 rastaban wrote: Wow, really surprised no one sees the vote switching without any reason at all not scummy. My case is misconstrued as "risk.nuke has not yet posted anything of value." That would be a case against Also I never saw Sloosh's post as it took me far longer than 30 minutes to work up a case against risk. You know why ,because I don't throw accusations around wildly until I have convinced myself. Last game as a doctor I had no gun and so I had to mafia reads and a town read but since it was my first game in a year and I was afraid that without a gun if I pushed too hard they would want me to shoot and out my role. Well no one seemed to care about my cases but me but in the end I was correct. Day 1 of Bang Bang I posted this: "Meapak_Ziphh, your filter looked really bad last night tons of filler and no posts contributing to discussion, but you seem to be posting more like your normal self today. Mind explaining what was going on?" I actually had an entire case typed up like I just did for risk and yet I decided to go easy and let him slide, well guess what he was GF. If I had pushed for him like I thought I should have day 1 we might have outed GF immediately. This game I am trying something different since I don't worry about having a gun, I am going to push my scum reads and try and save my town reads. If I get lynched for that, at least town gets a trail votes to follow that led up to it. Sorry but this is so similar to bang bang's Gonzaw fiasco where everyone clamored about him being red while I thought the case against him was awful, he gets shot flips blue and since it was almost all townies pushing the lynch we started the next day clueless as to where to begin which is why I had to post the Cephiro case linked above to begin with. So yeah, I stand by thinking risk is our best candidate and want him lynched. I am putting forward someone who is actually scummy instead of the marv case where half of it is based on his reaction to a leading question. Why risk.nuke and not MrZentor? Can you demonstrate the differences you see which makes risk.nuke the more likely scum, in your opinion? Because I feel they have played a similar game up until now. When I review MrZentor I see someone who hasn't contributed much, which, while scummy, isn't enough to lynch yet in my opinion.,Especially when he commits to delivering something tomorrow. I have seen players like Foolishness say the same thing so I am inclined to give him till tomorrow before I make my Judgment on him. I feel like Nuke hasn't just been a null, like MrZentor, by not contributing, but that his actions further scum agendas. There are legitimate reasons a town player may not contribute day 1, but I can't find legitimate town reasons for Risks actions. His "lol, ok #1 scum response ##Vote: marvellosity" Seems like such a cop out to get a vote on marv, instead of finding for a reason himself or even investigating it. It is the combination of not contributing but still trying to push a lynch that I find very questionable and seperated him from MrZ. What does town gain by him voting Klaust later, but not mentioning why he is doing it? The huge time gap, is so strange as well. I can see not being caught up and posting a quick one liner, but to be aware enough that one of the players still needs to post, to take your vote off someone you said was scummy, and yet not take even a moment to say something seems strange to me. I would like to hear from him on these actions and why he did it, maybe I am missing something but I feel that his actions make him extremely suspicious. So, what sets them apart is: 1. MrZentor has promised analysis (which is a null tell), while risk.nuke didn't. 2. risk.nuke's quite clearly unserious vote on marvellosity (null tell). 3. Somehow risk.nuke's play (i.e. posting some insignificant stuff early during D1, throwing an unserious vote on marv and pressure voting VK) "furthers scum agendas". What the fuck? He didn't even remotely influence the town in any way, and if lurking this early is furthering scum agendas, every player is scummy during early D1. 4. risk.nuke's pressure vote on VK, who had not yet said anything (null tell). This is enough to make rastaban extremely suspicious of risk.nuke. To me it seems like scum trying really hard to paint someone up as scum. In this post he says that he will try to push his scum reads, yet he switches his vote over to MrZentor without really pushing his case further (although I have to admit that it's quite hard when it sucks so hard that everyone disagrees with it). He says this: "The reason I wanted to wait on on mr.Z untill tomorrow was because he stayed in, even after subbing out. now it isn't deffinate by any leas but it increases the likelyhood he got a blue or red role. I didn't mention this earlier because if he wasn't scum then it increased his chance of getting hit tonight. However I think his vote on marv after claiming both were probably town is pretty incriminating." Some bullshit reasoning about MrZentor being red or blue and a voteswitch that doesn't make any difference to the lynch whatsoever, and this is enough for rastaban to stop pushing his best scum read. As slOosh later points out, there was also a whole 24 hour-period between MrZentor saying that they're both town and him changing his vote to marv. It's not really strange that he changed his mind during this period. It is also D1, which means that no reads are very certain (even likelier that MrZ changed his mind). On June 24 2012 04:52 rastaban wrote: Show nested quote + On June 24 2012 04:40 slOosh wrote: Yea I really think rastaban has a higher chance of flipping mafia than MrZentor. On June 23 2012 03:08 rastaban wrote: This game I am trying something different since I don't worry about having a gun, I am going to push my scum reads and try and save my town reads. If I get lynched for that, at least town gets a trail votes to follow that led up to it. On June 23 2012 23:23 rastaban wrote: On June 23 2012 19:34 marvellosity wrote: Fairly happy with risk's recent contribution. Had a look through Zentor's filter. His vote on me was the first time he mentioned me at all (other than the general 'how intense' comment), and worse it was in response to Zephirdd's comment about scum bussing. 'One of them has to die' - why? no reasoning. I first got my anti-town read on Zentor in Bang Bang when he mysteriously lumped Toad into his list of scumreads without having previously mentioned him, because other people had done so. So pretty satisfied with where my vote is right now. I disagree about risk, he defended himself but didn't actually contribute yet. However I doubt I am going to get enough people to vote for him today. The reason I wanted to wait on on mr.Z untill tomorrow was because he stayed in, even after subbing out. now it isn't deffinate by any leas but it increases the likelyhood he got a blue or red role. I didn't mention this earlier because if he wasn't scum then it increased his chance of getting hit tonight. However I think his vote on marv after claiming both were probably town is pretty incriminating. He isn't doing what he said he would do - hold him accountable. He pushes risk saying that he is scummy, yet waits for risk to defend himself. When he does, all he doesn't comment on whether the defense is valid or not, but dismisses the whole thing and says risk still hasn't contributed. How is that pushing scum reads? He clearly still has one, but isn't pushing it. He is merely going with the flow and sentiment of town. Compare his play here to his play in Bang Bang, in which he is confident in what he says and isn't afraid to put out his thoughts. In this game there is more fluff and more references to games that don't really prove anything. Moreso, suspicions of him have been ignored several times, which indicates resistance. Vote rastaban. Guess what there is more than 1 mafia in this game o.O surprising huh. I still want risk lynched, but do you really think 6 other people are going to do that in the next few hours? No, because everyone seemed to want to discuss me instead of my case. And this game if we don't get 7 votes on someone then it is a no lynch which is very bad for town. Also if I stay on risk it doesn't say anything about my alignment if I am the only one. I think Zentor is currently the second scummiet player after risk. As I mentioned earlier his voting for someone who he thought wasn't scum pushed me from being neutral on him to him being likely scum. I felt his play only fit a red or blue player, I don't think he is blue now so red is most likely. Also staying on risk is the safe move it means regardless of the lynch results I am not responsible For the outcome. Two problems with this post: 1. Jumping onto the MrZentor wagon without providing any sound reasoning doesn't really say that much about your alignment either. rastaban didn't play a major part in the lynching of MrZentor. He could be a bandwagoning scum just as well as a bandwagoning townie. 2. This is scum thinking (the bolded part). He is trying not to look suspicious (keep in mind that he already knows that MrZentor will flip town). He is trying to appear pro-town by saying that he can be held accountable for lynching a townie. (He wasn't even responsible for the lynch anyway.) Then we have rastaban's follow-up on risk.nuke's defense/analysis. I'll put it in a spoiler to reduce the size of my post. My comments are in bold (open the nested quotes). + Show Spoiler + On June 25 2012 07:39 rastaban wrote: Well it was ignored day 1, but perhaps with more information available to us now you will see that I was correct in my original annalysis. I will start with his post responding to my original post. Show nested quote + On June 23 2012 10:15 risk.nuke wrote: So my first thought is what two players are yelling the loudest at eachother. It's Vicera and Marv. So naturally my first assumption would be to remove both of those from my day 1 lynch pool. While Vicera doubtlessly seems like the towniest townie ever towned marv seems a bit scummy. Partly because how his inabillity to see how Vicera is town. Anyway lets go to Rastaban, I'm sort of writing this on the fly out of lazyness so I still haven't decided who I want dead the most yet. + Show Spoiler [Rastaban Says] + On June 23 2012 00:31 rastaban wrote: I would like to put forward a new actor into the spotlight who I feel doesn't want this movie finished. One risk.nuke! This fellow looks shady to me and he must have gotten Kirsten Stewart for his actor for the poor job he has done hiding his distain for our movie. Check it out: Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 07:28 risk.nuke wrote: Well Zentor started out very strong but then his activity dropped which is all-in-all a scumtrait. He spends half of his posts unnecessarily defending himself and the other half is useless 1-worders. I would very much like him to come here and explain himselves. Seeing how he can be one of the largest postcount in this game and have said so little of significance. This is his most rounded and contributing post... And it is a joke post. Next we get this gem: Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 07:52 risk.nuke wrote: While I agree Zentor is a scourge to have on the gamefield I don't think we should kill him to be rid of him. That's not the way. As for now I want to hear from more players. Not much here, he defends Z but against an attack that was never going to happen anyway so a null read on this one Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 07:57 risk.nuke wrote: On June 22 2012 07:53 Snarfs wrote: I have a great idea guys: Let's lynch Probulous so that we immediately know which team is going to lose, then whoever is on that team can just forfeit and we all save a ton of time! ##Vote Probulous! what? What a quality contribution, but after wanting to hear more from players he certainly doesn't add anything himself or even push this thought further. The original post was a joke regarding probs penchant for losing lately but risk doesn't follow up to even find that out. Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 08:03 risk.nuke wrote: I say we lynch zephirdd on account of not realising we're past fun-time. Wants to lynch zeph but like most bad actors he says the lines but doesn't have his actions (vote) match up to his words. He doesnt want to have the case lead back to him, and until more people have joined in he holds his vote. Perhaps you might think he is an actor who values life and is very conservative with his voting habits, but you will soon see that is not the case. Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 08:55 risk.nuke wrote: lol, ok #1 scum response ##Vote: marvellosity Now he gets crazy like Charlie Sheen, he now throws his vote onto the marv train, but he doesn't add anything to the arguments, he doesn't even mention agreeing with others but instead he bases his vote off one post. What was this incriminating post? Well I thought it must have been the dodge marv made or perhaps his posts where he says he is confidant he doesn't get lynched, but no it is this one. Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 08:53 marvellosity wrote: On June 22 2012 08:41 Zephirdd wrote: This is a semi-closed setup. If there are 13 players, it's possible that 12 are medics and 1 is a scum. Of course that's retarded as fuck, but nothing is concrete and we shouldn't think "but it's not common to 2 of X" exist ever. at all. In fact, we can't even confirm the existence of a SK until after the night phase. I'm not sure about Millers instaclaiming. While it clears path for cops(as it's pretty obvious that they will show red), it also reduces the number of possible blues, making it easier for scum. At least what I understood from the setup is that Millers can't be blues. If anything, Millers should be breadcrumbing and claiming in case a cop calls them guilty. For all other purposes, they should be *Vanilla*(unclaimed, aka. possible blue) to make it harder for mafia to shoot into blues. Thanks, I will pass this on to my scumbuddies immediately. Marv is showing how absurd it is to have millers breadcrumb so they can be saved later, and this post is the one risk decides justifies throwing the weight of his vote behind? I think he thought the risk train was gaining momentum and wanted to get on board. Show nested quote + On June 22 2012 19:01 risk.nuke wrote: ##Unvote: marvellosity ##Vote: von Klaust II Here is his latest post, what!!!??? This is so out of the blue, he never says why he changes his mind, he doesn't even say why he votes for klaust though I am guessing inactivity. This is a huge throw away vote meaning nothing as he doesn't even ask for klaus to speak up. On top of that look at the time stamps, this occurs 10 hours after his Last post. So picture this, risk votes marv, 10 hours later he comes and votes klaust with no reasoning at all. Ahha, but what has changed? Well I and a few others have pushed for slowing down on tunneling marv, and he realizes that it might not happen. Prob mentions the lurkers need to get posting and names klaust as one of them, risk immediately votes for him. So he has 10 hours between his posts and apparently knows enough to change his mind on the marv lynch and that klaust hasn't posted yet and still we don't get even a single line of content from. This is a mafia mindset, all of hs targets are equally scummy since none of them are scum so he doesn't care about who gets lynched as long as it isn't them. Let's kick this sham of an actor off our set before he changes this movie from Signs into The Happening. ##Vote: risk.nuke There are alot of things I don't like in his so called analysis of me. Mainly because these posts were made right at the start of the game and were mostly just for getting up the activity and he complains how they are content-short. It should be obvious why it's impossible to make a case when you're the first player to talk. Oviously he doesn't approve of the case, and he says the posts were made right at the start of the game, so there was nothing to discuss. Only the first 2 posts fit this criteria and I pointed out they weren't applicable. What is else is that you will see nothing has changed since this point in his posting habits All these posts were made early D1, and you are still only bringing up null tells, so there really isn't more that he can say to defend himself. You're right in that he continues lurking quite hard, but both townies and scum can be lurky. Not picking up on posting might indicate that a player is mafia, but he might as well be a lazy townie. It's basically impossible to get an accurate read on them, which is why they're so dangerous to town. Second I think it favors town to lynch mafia rather then prioritizing people soley because they are unpleasant and that's what I said. How is it scummy? I didn't understand that inside joke that post seemed to be and I wanted Prob to come back and explain himself or post some more. Scum are sometimes a bit tense and scared to jump into the thread and zephirdd choose to jump in with some joke-post which I thought was suspicious. His entire, Oh the game has started "insert joke stuff here" felt in the spur of the moment like a condemnable lie. I voted marv because I though that was something a mafia would say when they thought the case against them was poor. Then lastly he's completely misinterpreting my voteswitch. This you probably don't know but I felt a bit annoyed because i realised that in my last games I've had an unstatisticly high ratio of misreads in the earlygame and I came to the conclusion that it's because I'm to lenient to lurkers. So I pressurevoted a guy who still hadn't joined us (but shortly after did~ heeyoo~) Anyway I didn't explain myself because I thought a pressurevote on a lurker was decent reasoning enough and it shouldn't had been so hard to figure out that was what I was doing without me spelling it out for you. Here he admits he is changing his play style and his reasoning is he is too lenient to lurkers, but he is lurking this whole game. I don't buy it This is a slight scum tell. First one in your entire case against risk.nuke. + Show Spoiler [Rastaban Says II] + On June 23 2012 03:08 rastaban wrote: Wow, really surprised no one sees the vote switching without any reason at all not scummy. My case is misconstrued as "risk.nuke has not yet posted anything of value." That would be a case against Also I never saw Sloosh's post as it took me far longer than 30 minutes to work up a case against risk. You know why ,because I don't throw accusations around wildly until I have convinced myself. Last game as a doctor I had no gun and so I had to mafia reads and a town read but since it was my first game in a year and I was afraid that without a gun if I pushed too hard they would want me to shoot and out my role. Well no one seemed to care about my cases but me but in the end I was correct. Day 1 of Bang Bang I posted this: "Meapak_Ziphh, your filter looked really bad last night tons of filler and no posts contributing to discussion, but you seem to be posting more like your normal self today. Mind explaining what was going on?" I actually had an entire case typed up like I just did for risk and yet I decided to go easy and let him slide, well guess what he was GF. If I had pushed for him like I thought I should have day 1 we might have outed GF immediately. This game I am trying something different since I don't worry about having a gun, I am going to push my scum reads and try and save my town reads. If I get lynched for that, at least town gets a trail votes to follow that led up to it. Sorry but this is so similar to bang bang's Gonzaw fiasco where everyone clamored about him being red while I thought the case against him was awful, he gets shot flips blue and since it was almost all townies pushing the lynch we started the next day clueless as to where to begin which is why I had to post the Cephiro case linked above to begin with. So yeah, I stand by thinking risk is our best candidate and want him lynched. I am putting forward someone who is actually scummy instead of the marv case where half of it is based on his reaction to a leading question. Not much here but I think it's safe to say it shouldn't take 30 minutes or more to analyse what very little I had written, come on, it's not many lines. Another key thing, he faults how long it took me but as you will soon see for thinking it only takes 30 min to argue a case he doesn't ever post one himself. Making this remark is certainly rude, and it could be interpreted as a slight scum tell, but it is mostly null. My last comments on this post by rastaban are at the bottom of the spoiler (after rastaban puts his vote on risk.nuke). In this post Rastaban makes sense. He supports the miller-must claim which is basic. Though I wouldn't award him town-points for agreeing. The second paragraph is more interesting to me. It shows that he knows how to be carefull with bandwagons. Which makes no sense at all that the next thing he does is he try to push me hard on exagerated and out-of-context reasoning. I think I'm done with rastaban but it's 3:15 now. Sorry T.B.C. tomorrow. He ends with T.B.C. tomorrow, but as you will see he never followed up with anything to help town from this point on. Let me lump he next few posts together. Show nested quote + On June 24 2012 01:49 risk.nuke wrote: rastaban zephirdd and zentor, what are your thoughts on eachother? Show nested quote + On June 24 2012 01:53 risk.nuke wrote: vonKlaust II what are your thoughts on the lynch? Instead of contributing any original thoughts at all to the conversation he sits around asking 1 line questions with no follow up. This is a perfect way for scum to hide as it doesn't require any original thoughts from them. Show nested quote + On June 24 2012 02:22 risk.nuke wrote: There are a few hours left but it's starting to become time we worked up on a majority. I'm going to vote for Rastaban ##Unvote: von Klaust II ##Vote: Rastaban Again we have a vote, this time on me but what is missing? Any reasoning on why. His biggest reason is to start working on a majority, but at this point we already had or almost had one on Zentor, so why vote for me over zentor? I think he just wanted to spread out the mafia vote so they weren't all on one guy. Show nested quote + On June 24 2012 04:47 risk.nuke wrote: Honestly I'm fine with both Zentor and Rastaban (Klaus aswell and maybe zephirdd), I'm feeling I prefer rastaban but I don't care enough to sway people one way or the other. Aslong as we have majority on one, This post is incredibly incriminating... he is fine with lynching 4 different people. He has yet to give a single reason on any of them but he finds all of them viable targets. To me this is the words of mafia and not a town player. Show nested quote + On June 24 2012 04:54 risk.nuke wrote: Rastaban if you still think I'm scummy why haven't you bothered defending your case? Another post where he asks questions of other players and yet still adds 0 to the game himself. Show nested quote + On June 24 2012 04:58 risk.nuke wrote: I agree completely prplhz those are thoughts I've felt about zephirdd aswell. Show nested quote + On June 24 2012 05:00 risk.nuke wrote: On June 24 2012 04:58 risk.nuke wrote: I agree completely prplhz those are thoughts I've felt about zephirdd aswell. The Miller point and the VE+Marv=scum. Now he agrees with someone, and says he had been thinking the same thing. He uses past tense and yet why didn't he bring the accusation forward or say something but instead waited on others? He has already said it shouldn't have taken me 30 minutes to put a case together against him, and yet he is so busy he can't not only put a case together but not even add a single original thought this entire game. He hasn't added a single thing to this entire game, and his only time to post anything longer than a line or two was when he felt threatened. He promised to follow up but didn't, He was fine with lynching any of four people, never trying to narrow those results down to the right one because as scum he doesn't care who dies when they are townies.. ##Vote risk.nuke
After this he has one lenghty post (on Mattchew) along with some shorter posts. Nothing that really stuck out to me as either towny or scummy. He is uncertain about the marv/Mattchew lynch, but I can't really fault him for that. It was a difficult situation. I can't be arsed to examine it in detail at the moment, but I will take a more in-depth look at it tomorrow... TL;DR: rastaban is scum. ##Vote rastaban | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 28 2012 13:12 GMT
#1335
I'm not the SK. I tried to provoke risk.nuke into posting more by being aggressive, and that's why the post seems out of character. You're reading too much into it. | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 28 2012 13:14 GMT
#1336
On June 28 2012 21:40 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On June 28 2012 21:18 marvellosity wrote: yeah I don't know right now. I was too hasty yesterday with my answers. I have to put in a monumental amount of effort to try to refocus my reads and with town's negligible chance of winning I'm struggling to find the motivation. Again I'm spamming like a baws, but obviously I will find the effort at some stage. Everyone seriously needs to help me with my questions and analysis, especially if it involves me. Just kill rastaban. Refocus your reads tomorrow. | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 28 2012 15:42 GMT
#1365
@rastaban Well, you are my #1 scum read at the moment, and you are comfortable lynching prplhz, and that makes me kind of wary... | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 28 2012 15:44 GMT
#1367
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 28 2012 15:53 GMT
#1376
On June 29 2012 00:46 prplhz wrote: But, you pointed out that it was factually wrong, or you pointed out that you were just drunk one night because of midsummer. What do you expect me to do respond to that? Do you expect me to try to prove that you weren't at midsummer or that you weren't drunk or whatever? There are still other (and much stronger points) in my case that I think are better than any other case in this game. Now you're trying to infer my alignment through rastaban's actions. You can't do that. He could be pushing his town mate because he's wrong, he could be pushing scum because he's right, he could be pushing scum buddy for town credit, he could be pushing mislynch because he's scum. You can't do that and you're going to repeatedly fail if you insist on doing it. All right, fair point. If I can't infer your alignment from rastaban's actions, then I am fine lynching you. If you actually bothered to read my post on you, you'd see that the part about me being sleep drunk is not the point that I'm referring to. It's the part in italics: On June 27 2012 07:05 Shraft wrote: @prplhz's case If you cared to look up EMM, you'd see the exact same pattern. I am usually quite hesitant with lynches unless I got a strong scum read, and I don't put my vote down right off the bat. I don't use my vote like VE does. I wait until I'm content to vote for someone, and then I put my vote and let it be, barring any major events. Like I said, if you actually cared to read my previous game, you'd understand that I play this way. This part of your case is also interesting: Show nested quote + On June 27 2012 04:40 prplhz wrote: Next is the current marvellosity wagon, we talked about it for ages but he is hesitant with his vote. He only votes after Probulous makes his big case. Earlier he said that the question-answer-thing was a bit scummy but it wasn't worth lynching marvellosity over, but now he is using that very same argument for voting for marvellosity! I also think it's very telling that he is actually saying that marvellosity is scum for saying that his own behavior is town. Why would any townie ever say that his own play is scummy when it is townie by definition? Townies think that everything they do is the towniest shit ever (even when it isn't which is surprisingly often). I'd like you to point out just where I said that. What I really said was "You acted scummy by not answering Mattchew's question straight. The way I see it, you have no reason whatsoever to not answer the question as honestly and precise as you can as town.". I never even mentioned anything pertaining to lynching marvellosity in this post, and before that I hadn't even commented on him. You're also twisting my words when you say that I'm that marvellosity is scum for saying that his own behavior is town. I said that it was scummy that he somehow turned his anti-town behaviour into some proof that he was town. This part is such an overexaggeration that it's almost scummy. Show nested quote + On June 27 2012 04:40 prplhz wrote: He is also keen to point out how tired and drunk he is all the time, like he's trying to apologize for his play. Scum are a lot more prone to apologize for their game because, unlike townies, they're not actually trying their best and they don't see their game as inherently good! I have two posts relating to this: here and here. They are also referencing the same day (today), and since chose to not sleep the previous night and instead stay up to read and comment on Probulous case, it's certain that it's not just some bullshit excuse. The only point of your case that is actually factual, and not some kind of twisting of my words or overexaggeration to make me look scummy, is that I said it's probably too late to sway the lynch. I don't think that's very strange considering that almost all discussion today has been on marvellosity, and not one strong case has been presented on any other player. Other than marvellosity, most players seem to disagree on lynch targets. If you want to lynch me based on my hesitance on the marvellosity lynch, then go ahead, but don't come with bullshit lies in order to paint me up as scum. I am also curious about why you don't care about my play in EMM. Can't you see that my style of voting is exactly the same? | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 28 2012 15:56 GMT
#1378
On June 29 2012 00:46 marvellosity wrote: how do you justify telling the only confirmed townie to not bother thinking about his reads until tomorrow? It wasn't a very serious comment, you know. The serious part of it is that I want to kill rastaban. | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 28 2012 15:59 GMT
#1379
Can you explain to me why you took a bunch of null tells on risk.nuke, said they furthered scum agenda and pushed them as if they were blatant scum tells? Or do you still insist on them being actual scum tells? | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 28 2012 17:44 GMT
#1389
If prplhz is actually trying to find scum he's doing one hell of a bad job of it... | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 28 2012 17:48 GMT
#1390
prplhz pushed for a policy lynch on MrZ and wrote a shitty case on me. If prplhz is actually trying to find scum he's doing one hell of a bad job | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 28 2012 19:23 GMT
#1412
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 28 2012 23:22 GMT
#1468
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 28 2012 23:22 GMT
#1469
##Vote Snarfs | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 28 2012 23:33 GMT
#1472
Going to watch Rear Window now. I'll be back in two hours. | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 29 2012 01:43 GMT
#1488
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 29 2012 14:45 GMT
#1513
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 29 2012 14:45 GMT
#1514
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 29 2012 15:13 GMT
#1518
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 29 2012 15:15 GMT
#1520
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 29 2012 15:22 GMT
#1523
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 29 2012 15:30 GMT
#1529
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 30 2012 00:57 GMT
#1558
On June 30 2012 07:26 marvellosity wrote: gg i am actually awesome for the first tmie in the game. kthx Won't last very long. Your read on me is wrong. | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 30 2012 01:18 GMT
#1560
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 30 2012 22:07 GMT
#1567
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 30 2012 22:15 GMT
#1569
On June 29 2012 08:33 Shraft wrote: Hmpf. How do I convince you that I am town? Because even if Snarfs flips scum and your process of elimination worked fine for working out his alignment, we're going to lose tonight or the coming day if SK shoots me or I get lynched. Going to watch Rear Window now. I'll be back in two hours. "You can't. I know you are not town." | ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
June 30 2012 22:18 GMT
#1571
| ||
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
July 01 2012 13:26 GMT
#1616
@marv: I was being as asshole as well. I should've tried to make helpful posts instead of taunting you. Sorry. | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games summit1g13129 Grubby2603 shahzam986 Day[9].tv845 C9.Mang0215 ViBE213 Maynarde185 Trikslyr42 ROOTCatZ23 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH309 StarCraft: Brood War• Hupsaiya ![]() • RyuSc2 ![]() • IndyKCrew ![]() • sooper7s • AfreecaTV YouTube • Migwel ![]() • intothetv ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Kozan League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games |
OSC
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
The PondCast
Online Event
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
Online Event
Sparkling Tuna Cup
OSC
|
|