EPTfair enough
Bastard Mafia 2 - Page 26
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
fair enough | ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
| ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
ET DB FF BSC (KB) Third party S+B Maju 201 (KB) Null Acro Hiro Dec xsksc Hyaach | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18159 Posts
Why is BioSC scum? Why do you think FF made a case on ET if they are scum together? Early D1 bus? Or are you trying to say either one could be scum and you don't know which? | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18159 Posts
| ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On June 19 2012 02:34 Acrofales wrote: Btw, you're playing increasingly to your Holy Roman meta. You really just threw out a bunch of names without actually reasoning about ANY of them. You playing into your Holy Roman meta = me thinking you're scum. You're gonna get no where from meta analysis so don't bother | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On June 19 2012 02:32 Acrofales wrote: Why do you think S&B is 3P? Why is BioSC scum? Why do you think FF made a case on ET if they are scum together? Early D1 bus? Or are you trying to say either one could be scum and you don't know which? He thinks I'm third party because he doesn't agree with my case against him, as far as I can tell. And also because I went along with Talismania's attempt to get people to post cases? Anyway not for any good reason. Oh and Drazerk, I disagree when you say "town fuck up, scum don't." Scum fuck up. That's why so many TL scum have been uber-lurking lately. If we don't make it uncomfortable for them, then they'll get away with it this time too. Anyway even if they don't fuck up, getting them to talk is the only way we can figure out who is pushing the scum agenda. (hint it's you) | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
 | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
You could be earning yourself a ban for actively playing against your win condition and you wouldn't even know about it. I really hope you're lying right now. | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
If I am scum it helps me survive and become more pro town If I am third party it helps me survive and become more pro town | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
| ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On June 19 2012 03:01 Drazerk wrote: I can only be playing as town If I am scum it helps me survive and become more pro town If I am third party it helps me survive and become more pro town What if your role is "keep target player alive" and you lead his lynch? What if you're a lyncher and you defend your target? For someone who keeps saying "we need to consider all the scenarios" you seem to have considered none of the scenarios. | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
I think you're lying, because if you're not then you really do deserve a ban. | ||
|
KharadBanar
Austria463 Posts
I will throw my responses into the quote in bold text. On June 18 2012 22:59 DropBear wrote: Yes he did answer my suspicions. With a post that made me more suspicious of him. I accused him of talking a lot and saying nothing, he replied, his reply was more of the same. I think he is scum because he made a slip that is not including himself among town. KharadBanar's response: In all the games I've read on this forum, this kind of argumentation has lead to more dead townies than scum. I wish people would take things like that less seriously, because this is equally likely to happen to everybody. I think he is scum because of his constant apologising which shows inherent guilt. KharadBanar's response: If you look at my filters in the two games which I have played so far (Newbie Mini Mafia VI and Newbie Mini Mafia VIII), you will see that I am a very "defensive" player regardless of alignment. I put "defensive" in quotation marks there because I'm not acting that way because of guilt tripping, but because I want the other players to understand my thought processes. All the things I said about House Chezinu were directly based upon that. I think he is scum because of his flailing around based on popular opinion regarding house chezinu on night0 trying desperately not to offend anybody. KharadBanar's response: I would not call my allying to the House "popular opinion". At the time, there was only Nisani201 who had already done that, and loads of other people in the thread were very skeptic of them. Also, letting one's opinion be influenced by others in the thread is not a bad thing. If nobody would ever let themselves get influenced by good arguments, we (town) would never reach a consensus which is very much needed at many points in the game (though possibly not Night 0). I think he is scum because of his large wordy but contentless post saying things like "giving mafia information is bad" in 3 paragraphs that make it look like he is helping but he isn't. KharadBanar's response: Again, read my filters in the previous games. Being verbose is just what I do, it is a character trait of me just like Drazerk's aggressive arguing and Kenpachi's disinterested trolling. I think he is scum rather than a third party because Nisani is defending him and Nisani is dodgy as shit. Nisani defends him from both xcxkc or however you spell it and also myself. As for this first post I made which you keep bringing up, I said I wouldn't join. And I didn't join. My actions speak for themselves. As for a possible lynch, I have just come home and read up on the thread; I didn't have enough time to go through people's filters yet, which I will now do. The only thing I can say for sure is that I don't like Drazerk's recent behaviour, especially his recent statement saying that he has not even read his role PM. Now I know that this per definition does not say anything about his alignment, but I think that Mafia, even if it's a bastard game, should be taken serious to at least some standard, because everything else is just retarded (imagine everyone doing that...) | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On June 19 2012 03:07 strongandbig wrote: What if your role is "keep target player alive" and you lead his lynch? What if you're a lyncher and you defend your target? For someone who keeps saying "we need to consider all the scenarios" you seem to have considered none of the scenarios. Read the last game - Keeping people alive fails the moment you die yourself As for killing a specific person I want to kill everyone so that is unlikely | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
Just want to point that out | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18159 Posts
##unvote ##vote Drazerk | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On June 19 2012 03:14 Acrofales wrote: That you haven't read your role pm is about as true as that you had to sheep my vote in Holy Roman. I really dislike the way you're playing and you are definitely not helping town with it. ##unvote ##vote Drazerk You keep mentioning holy roman Read all my games Realize what meta is going to do for you | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18159 Posts
On June 19 2012 03:15 Drazerk wrote: You keep mentioning holy roman Read all my games Realize what meta is going to do for you Point me to a recent, relevant, game in which you were town. I have read WaW2 and you played very differently. For one, you were verbose and not posting irritating 1-liners. I have read Aperture, but you weren't town and were killed D1. So yeah, start pointing. Also, lets assume you're telling the truth and you haven't read your role PM. We know you're not the MA, because a king was chosen. If we assume the MA is town, that makes you by far the best option for a RNG policy lynch, because the odds of you being town are less than for anybody else. Given that you are ensuring that any read on you is about as useful as a RNG policy lynch on you would be, this is an excellent choice for us D1! Added bonus: we get rid of a confirmed troll, who is clearly not intending to contribute this game. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18159 Posts
| ||
| ||
