Magic: The Gathering Mini Mafia - Page 66
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Add to that the fact that I was, along with Bugs and you, one of the first today to put any pressure on Zealos and I would say that not quite EVERYTHING is wrong. What I find the most interesting is that you came in here and posted half-assed attacks of me and Bugs now, when you're about to leave, but yesterday when we would have had time to respond to this stuff you had no interest. I mean, I get that it was late, but you had PLENTY of posts yesterday before you went to bed between the observations you just commented on and when you when you left the thread. If "Everything is wrong here" then why not mention it then when I could respond? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On May 26 2012 22:40 VisceraEyes wrote: What I find the most interesting is that you came in here and posted half-assed attacks of me and Bugs now, when you're about to leave, but yesterday when we would have had time to respond to this stuff you had no interest. I mean, I get that it was late, but you had PLENTY of posts yesterday before you went to bed between the observations you just commented on and when you when you left the thread. If "Everything is wrong here" then why not mention it then when I could respond? Because to put together the last post I had to 1) go back and read the thread where where Zealos first breadcrumbed 2) go back and read the thread at the point Zealos revealed his claim properly 3) looked through wbg's and my filter to put together my thoughts on him 4) looked at your filter in conjunction with how things went down in the thread These things take time, and today is where I found that time. Do not try to discredit what I say because of when I posted it. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Now...regarding this sudden defensiveness..... | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On May 26 2012 22:40 VisceraEyes wrote: As far as your analysis of my actions Marvel, to be fair I hadn't gone back to analyze the claim at all, as you say, but when I did I realized the truth immediately, and gave the only actual analysis of WHY he was absolutely lying. Add to that the fact that I was, along with Bugs and you, one of the first today to put any pressure on Zealos and I would say that not quite EVERYTHING is wrong. So what if you were vaguely suspicious of Zealos early on? Scum are quiet happy to vaguely bus their team-mates, and you did so before I made the first major case on Zealos. As per my last post, it is the timings of how you responded to the claim that I find most suspicious. You went back to analyse only after I had heavily attacked the claim, and of course at that point it's very easy to argue for the switch. The fact is at the time when the wagon was growing on Hiro, you happily joined it with no critical thought. That is the pertinent point. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
Tunkeg
Norway1235 Posts
On May 26 2012 22:44 marvellosity wrote: Because to put together the last post I had to 1) go back and read the thread where where Zealos first breadcrumbed 2) go back and read the thread at the point Zealos revealed his claim properly 3) looked through wbg's and my filter to put together my thoughts on him 4) looked at your filter in conjunction with how things went down in the thread These things take time, and today is where I found that time. Do not try to discredit what I say because of when I posted it. Have you considered the possibility off a scumteam with both WBG and VE? And that their headbutting is a deliberate scumtactic to throw town off? I was thinking about this, because I have found both abit weird. But my conclusion on it is that it is pretty far fetched, and isn't a possibility worth looking into until one have flipped scum (if that were to happend). I also think there are far better targets as previously mentioned, and neither WBG or VE should be targets of a lynch for day 3. In fact I don't believe either is scum as of now. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On May 26 2012 22:57 VisceraEyes wrote: That is a soft claim...a breadcrumb is like...him hinting at his action BEFORE he makes it so.that if he dies we as a town can guess at the actions he took...he did no such thing. Why are you picking at wording? I was just saying that is the point of the thread to go back and read. Call it whatever the hell you like. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
And I thought we were going to find the scum together. This recent turn makes me a sad VE. | ||
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 26 2012 21:42 marvellosity wrote: I don't like this '50-50 case'. This isn't the case. Zealos was getting lynched before he outed his claim because a lot of people believed he was scum. Hiro did not have a single vote. I don't get in which world this is 50-50 I meant there was a 50-50 chance Zealos was scum and a 50-50 chance Hiro was scum. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On May 26 2012 23:00 Acid~ wrote: I meant there was a 50-50 chance Zealos was scum and a 50-50 chance Hiro was scum. Yes, and my post there shows how that wasn't the case... | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I don't need this - it's still night. I'm not going to be dragged into a shouting match right now. | ||
Tunkeg
Norway1235 Posts
On May 26 2012 23:02 marvellosity wrote: Yes, and my post there shows how that wasn't the case... My read is that Acid does not even try to understand half of what he reads. See what I did here Acid? Now reply to: On May 26 2012 21:46 Tunkeg wrote: Why are my posts useless? Give me examples. What posts is it that you think I don't understand? What are your understanding of how I understand them? Bring something else then this discrediting shit man. | ||
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 26 2012 22:09 Tunkeg wrote: Also Acid you are contradicting yourself big time if you say you enjoyed the shit out of Mattchews posting: I'll admit I have a hard time reading these flavor posts as they have some ambiguity to them (hence why I hated them in the first place). But the way I interpret this is that you think Mattchew is being annoying with his flavor posting. Doesn't surprise me. You're much too litteral in your reading. By posting in the same manner as him, I wanted to express support on a personal level. However, I also wanted to point out that his posting could end up being detrimental to town if it pissed off the other townies. | ||
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 26 2012 23:02 marvellosity wrote: Yes, and my post there shows how that wasn't the case... No, it shows why *you* think it wasn't the case. Am I still allowed to form my own opinions? | ||
| ||