|
On May 31 2012 00:28 Mattchew wrote:Show nested quote +On May 30 2012 23:42 supersoft wrote:On May 30 2012 23:08 Mattchew wrote:On May 30 2012 22:45 supersoft wrote:okay how many people took bullets? MZ took a hit wherebugsgo took a hit both of them were saved. Forumite took a hit aswell. Vigs who shot one of them must claim now. On May 30 2012 09:11 Mattchew wrote:
Hey guys... I wasn't shot... But strongandbig fell into my trap cause he knew this (Aka his team didn't shoot me)... If the trap failed it would have made scum believe there was a vig shot already used or an sk or something (Aka giving them fake game info) so it seemed like a win-win this is so strange. Might be scum panicking after he saw that no townplayer died. I didn't even wait for WBG to claim his hit, how is that panicking... Did you read the post in context to the entire thread or just in my filter or quoted somewhere? fuck you okay? I hate to deal with idiots like you. Of course i read that shit in the context. Noone claimes so far. You claimed before any PMs went out that told people they were hit. Scumteam know who they hit. obviously they dont have to wait for claims to know who was hit. WTF dude. As a side note I am not offended by this at all. I did not realize that the hit notices went out after my post, care to explain how you knew this because no where in the thread is this posted. Also, what I am saying is that as scum, why would I claim a fake hit that I KNOW can be EZ mode outted as a lie because WBG and MZ are alive. My move was to try and catch someone that knew more than townies about the night shots. SnB was that person, he couldn't keep his information to himself. Whether it was to look smarter when WBG inevitably claimed his hit and then a vig claimed mine or because he wanted to out the vig that shot me or to try and push a mislynch onto me for lying, his intentions and knowledge behind his post about me being shot were clear; He knew that I was not shot by scum in a time where the information available to the thread would not lead one to such conclusion
nvm. you dont understand my thoughtprocess and the pros for a scumteam to have one of them fake a hit. i draw that comclusion, because you keep repeating the same things i already read. on the other hand you're probably telling the truth now. i think your town gj.
|
anyways, I need several people to get in here before starting to explain stuff so I'm a little afk (I could tell you what I'm doing but some weird guy would probably come out of nowhere telling me that's some weird breadcrumb)
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Your point is "balance lol"
I'm not lynching on that.
|
Speaking of balance...more than 1 3rd party in the game sounds decidedly NOT normal. Just sayin. Catching up.
|
lynching on balance is completely reasonable. we need to keep that in mind. i devide my lists always in vets and noobs.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On May 31 2012 01:14 marvellosity wrote:
Your point is "balance lol"
I'm not lynching on that.
I'm convinced.
![[image loading]](http://hollywoodhatesme.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/hypnotoad.jpg)
|
Basing lynch due to game balance is not a compelling case at all.
Zealos lynch i'm fine with, his as red as can be and has not provide any explanation so far.
Gambit. I never read his filter yet.
And where is wiggles? I would like to see him post. If we are really doing a Vet lynch, his filter is imo at the same level as VE. Kita i didnt read.
|
What is everyone's problem with my play? I can't answer for accusations that aren't present. People are talking about wanting to lynch me, but no one seems to know why. Can someone help me out here?
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On May 31 2012 01:10 Toadesstern wrote:
anyways, I need several people to get in here before starting to explain stuff so I'm a little afk (I could tell you what I'm doing but some weird guy would probably come out of nowhere telling me that's some weird breadcrumb)
BREADCRUMB?!
Are you claiming Professor Membrane, the creator of supertoast?!
![[image loading]](http://cdn.buzznet.com/assets/users16/foolishxearthxcreature/default/professor-membrane-toast--large-msg-119759279368.jpg)
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
Also, none of the people I was hoping to hear from last night have posted. I'm a sad Kita 
|
On May 31 2012 00:59 Toadesstern wrote:
have you not read my mayoral campaing?
We don't lynch into WBG, we don't lynch into Foru (because dead), we don't lynch into me, we don't lynch into wiggles.
That's already 4 vets we're not willing to lynch into. Makes Kita / VE look pretty bad imo, even without meta.
Like, you're "confirmed town" right? I get why we don't lynch you...but why not lynch Wiggles or Bugs? Wiggles because he has an extra vote and looks town right? Bugs? Because he got hit? Did we completely forget that I claimed RB? And furthermore, we can rule out "jailed" because it appears Bugs was jailed right? So that leaves Roleblocked in the standard sense and that means that I can't be scum.
I don't have a compelling reason why I'm not 3rd party, aside from the fact that we've killed one already and like I said, multiple 3rd parties in a Normal game doesn't seem possible.
So again: why in the piss am I even being considered for lynch by anyone but Kitaman?
|
LOL Kita
I'm making........TOAST!!!
|
On May 31 2012 01:31 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2012 00:59 Toadesstern wrote:
have you not read my mayoral campaing?
We don't lynch into WBG, we don't lynch into Foru (because dead), we don't lynch into me, we don't lynch into wiggles.
That's already 4 vets we're not willing to lynch into. Makes Kita / VE look pretty bad imo, even without meta. Like, you're "confirmed town" right? I get why we don't lynch you...but why not lynch Wiggles or Bugs? Wiggles because he has an extra vote and looks town right? Bugs? Because he got hit? Did we completely forget that I claimed RB? And furthermore, we can rule out "jailed" because it appears Bugs was jailed right? So that leaves Roleblocked in the standard sense and that means that I can't be scum. I don't have a compelling reason why I'm not 3rd party, aside from the fact that we've killed one already and like I said, multiple 3rd parties in a Normal game doesn't seem possible. So again: why in the piss am I even being considered for lynch by anyone but Kitaman?
wiggles can die himself just fine (I loved when the hound said that to joffrey  )
Bugs is a vet but replaced in for someone else so unless we consider role-swapping after d1 had started I'd say he's not within the circle of vets that should be considered for balance.
|
Kita are you town?
I mean, obviously I have doubts...but I was unable to make a cohesive case against you last night when I tried. I think you're playing a pretty manipulative game, but not necessarily scummy after trying to build a case. I'm willing to work with you if you're town.
|
On May 31 2012 01:38 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2012 01:31 VisceraEyes wrote:On May 31 2012 00:59 Toadesstern wrote:
have you not read my mayoral campaing?
We don't lynch into WBG, we don't lynch into Foru (because dead), we don't lynch into me, we don't lynch into wiggles.
That's already 4 vets we're not willing to lynch into. Makes Kita / VE look pretty bad imo, even without meta. Like, you're "confirmed town" right? I get why we don't lynch you...but why not lynch Wiggles or Bugs? Wiggles because he has an extra vote and looks town right? Bugs? Because he got hit? Did we completely forget that I claimed RB? And furthermore, we can rule out "jailed" because it appears Bugs was jailed right? So that leaves Roleblocked in the standard sense and that means that I can't be scum. I don't have a compelling reason why I'm not 3rd party, aside from the fact that we've killed one already and like I said, multiple 3rd parties in a Normal game doesn't seem possible. So again: why in the piss am I even being considered for lynch by anyone but Kitaman? wiggles can die himself just fine (I loved when the hound said that to joffrey ) Bugs is a vet but replaced in for someone else so unless we consider role-swapping after d1 had started I'd say he's not within the circle of vets that should be considered for balance.
But Wiggles is more of a vet than Bugs! What are you even going on about?
|
On May 31 2012 01:39 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2012 01:38 Toadesstern wrote:On May 31 2012 01:31 VisceraEyes wrote:On May 31 2012 00:59 Toadesstern wrote:
have you not read my mayoral campaing?
We don't lynch into WBG, we don't lynch into Foru (because dead), we don't lynch into me, we don't lynch into wiggles.
That's already 4 vets we're not willing to lynch into. Makes Kita / VE look pretty bad imo, even without meta. Like, you're "confirmed town" right? I get why we don't lynch you...but why not lynch Wiggles or Bugs? Wiggles because he has an extra vote and looks town right? Bugs? Because he got hit? Did we completely forget that I claimed RB? And furthermore, we can rule out "jailed" because it appears Bugs was jailed right? So that leaves Roleblocked in the standard sense and that means that I can't be scum. I don't have a compelling reason why I'm not 3rd party, aside from the fact that we've killed one already and like I said, multiple 3rd parties in a Normal game doesn't seem possible. So again: why in the piss am I even being considered for lynch by anyone but Kitaman? wiggles can die himself just fine (I loved when the hound said that to joffrey ) Bugs is a vet but replaced in for someone else so unless we consider role-swapping after d1 had started I'd say he's not within the circle of vets that should be considered for balance. But Wiggles is more of a vet than Bugs! What are you even going on about?
I'm saying that wiggles is mayor and if he really is town we don't need to figure that out because he'll be dead soon enough anywas. Why would you want to lynch that.
Bugs is a vet but only replaced in.
|
Oh I see what you're saying.
nvm, you're carrying on Ken's work. He's better at it than you. Carry on if you want I guess.
|
On May 31 2012 01:42 VisceraEyes wrote:
Oh I see what you're saying.
nvm, you're carrying on Ken's work. He's better at it than you. Carry on if you want I guess.
Of course i am carrying on Ken's "work" that's the whole point of it although as already mentioned I'd reduce his list a little.
|
Also I'm pretty sure that:
If you are mafia you would not talk to me
If you are town you would talk to me but more like "listen to me, you're wrong. I am town"
If you are 3rd party you're usually posting like this:
On May 31 2012 01:38 VisceraEyes wrote:
Kita are you town?
I mean, obviously I have doubts...but I was unable to make a cohesive case against you last night when I tried. I think you're playing a pretty manipulative game, but not necessarily scummy after trying to build a case. I'm willing to work with you if you're town.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On May 31 2012 01:38 VisceraEyes wrote:
Kita are you town?
I mean, obviously I have doubts...but I was unable to make a cohesive case against you last night when I tried. I think you're playing a pretty manipulative game, but not necessarily scummy after trying to build a case. I'm willing to work with you if you're town.
I wanted to work together VE! I really did! But then you shunned logic and focused on your nonsense manipulation arguement to the point where you could no longer be included in our order! Don't blame us for your failings VE.
I counted 17 instances in your filter where you found me suspicious, wanted me lynched, or suggested that I should be shot. My policy has not changed. The only change is that I have written a case against you and Meapak no longer suspects me. So tell me, what has changed that made you go from the point of stating that I "claimed scum in the thread" to being town. You say you cannot build a case against me, but that did not stop you from pushing for my death the previous cycle. What gives?
Furthermore, why were you unwilling to push a case on me without Meapak's support? If I was truly your number one suspect, why does he have to push the lynch on me, rather than yourself?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
