|
On March 03 2012 08:11 kitaman27 wrote:He doesn't have one lol. We already argued with each other over this in the quicktopic. He claims to have protected syllo n1, me n2 and n3 His fake claim doesn't even work out due to this quote: A weak doctor breadcrumbs his checks because if he dies and flips weak doctor then town has a confirmed red, Instead he is telling us to lynch DrH if he dies. What kind of weak doctor tells town to lynch someone, knowing that he could be protecting a scum syllo and cause a mislynch. Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 07:33 kitaman27 wrote:On February 28 2012 04:41 wherebugsgo wrote:
@RoL: you're fucking lucky Toad scumslipped so hard, or I'd be pushing you like there's no tomorrow. All you do is lurk lurk lurk and then make excuses for your inactivity. That's exactly what you did when we were teammates in Couples Therapy and it's what you did (IIRC) in Purgatory as well. "gosh darnnit, I'd really love to vote for you RoL, but all these townies are just so easy to push" Remember this one? Despite my green check on toad, you STILL decided to vote toad. You claimed to me that you protected me from a hit. You confirmed in the thread that I couldn't be scum. AND YET YOU WOULD STILL RATHER VOTE TOAD OVER ROL INSISTING THAT THE CONFIRMED NONSCUM WAS LYING. Oh right, you're scum. Why am I responding to you?
I already explained why I said what I said about Dr. H and it had literally nothing to do with my role and everything to do with LoTR.
It's a great thing for scum to point out though, since it's probably the biggest mistake I've made all game (and I've made quite a few so far)
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
So bugs, after I lead the lynch on RoL, the first conclusion you come to is that I'm scum? Not BC? Not Layabout?
<3
|
WBG
BC
LayAbout
RoL
Let's do this.
|
On March 03 2012 08:15 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 19 2012 21:05 Palmar wrote:
Notifications
You will not receive any information you don’t need. You will not know if you were roleblocked, saved, investigated, visited or whether or not any of your actions had their desired effects or not. You can ask, but if I did not send you any information, you probably shouldn’t receive any.
So yeah, if he said that he saved you from a hit, he's a lying sack of scum Kita. He wouldn't know if he had or not. Right?
I didn't know if I saved him from a hit.
why the fuck do you think I'm calling him scum now?
rofl.
Basically the issue is that kita had pre-knowledge of a poisoner in the role. He comes out now and lies about the protections I claimed.
I could have been roleblocked; which makes complete sense in retrospect. I had no idea there was a poisoner, so I assumed that scum KP was 2; this is what I discussed with syllo.
Basically syllo told me he gave me a potion n1 to kita, and I told him I protected him (syllo). So, based on this info and 2 people flipping n2, I made the assumption that scum KP was 2. Syllo told me that night that he thought myself and Dr. H were the most likely shots because (based on our assumptions) both himself and kita had been hit once already.
I agreed and chose to protect Dr. H n2; this is why my interactions with Dr. H on day 3 seemed rather weird. I knew he was town because there was no way scum had 3 kp (and if they do that's fucking broken).
On February 28 2012 10:49 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:45 kitaman27 wrote:On February 28 2012 10:44 prplhz wrote:
Can't you do something instead? You make me smile prpl. you need to step up and contribute. You are almost 100% confirmed to me but you are doing nothing. Please. Do. Something.
this post was based on syllo giving kita the potion and him living; I didn't bother to protect kita on n2 because if he took a potion n1 and lived there was no way he would get shot n2. Ofc this was all on the assumption that mafia kp was 2; if mafia had a one shot poisoner (who poisoned Jackal? rofl wtf?) then I protected syllo n1 from the only scum shot that night and syllo gave kita a potion he would have simply discarded anyway.
This is also why on D3 I had no problem followng Dr. H (who was confirmed to me that night outside of me getting roleblocked; if I've been getting roleblocked then my visits are useless anyway) and kita onto prplhz. I was tainted by the fact that I blindly considered both players town, and I probably should've taken a step back and just realized prpl was playing badly.
D4 and I visited kita n3. This is the night I had to be roleblocked.
Now he's lying about what I claimed in the QT after claiming coward. What are the chances that there are two such roles in this game (given the number of blues that have flipped?) it's almost none.
Based on his behavior in the QT I kept calling kita third party, because there was something just off about what he was saying to me. He can lie all he wants and say i never said that, but I even said in thread he's either retarded or third party. If I was roleblocked, though,the simpler explanation is that he's just scum.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
I'm not going to waste my time responding to a scum bugs unless a member of town specifically requests it.
|
also if it isn't clear now, this is why I backed off on claiming when i realized it would be retarded to claim (when I had that spat with VE)
ofc scum caught onto it anyway and probably roleblocked me based on that. I recall kita even asking me, "where is that mindblowing claim" or whatever, and that should've been the hint.
I messed up hugely by OMGUSing VE out of pure frustration. That outted the fact that I had an important role and probably led me to being roleblocked.
|
On March 03 2012 08:35 kitaman27 wrote:
I'm not going to waste my time responding to a scum bugs unless a member of town specifically requests it.
you're not going to spend time responding to me because I am right and you can't argue against logic.
kk
|
so here's the good news:
tomorrow, mafia dies 100%. Why?
Between myself, layabout, kitaman, and Tyrran there are confirmed two mafia. Either we kill me or kita, or you kill tyrran or layabout.
Since there are four claimers here, the chance of one of them being confirmed town/scum tomorrow is 100%.
That's the good news. The bad news is that unless we kill the roleblocker tomorrow we can't get the other scum/town confirmed the next day.
|
On March 03 2012 08:14 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 03 2012 08:05 VisceraEyes wrote:
WBG - who have you protected each night? The fact that you claimed Weak Doctor (a role I'm assuming kills you if you protect scum?) means that you should have a laundry list of confirmed townies over the course of the game right? Why claim with no list? WTF? because it's only two people; syllo, and kita.
On March 03 2012 08:32 wherebugsgo wrote:
I agreed and chose to protect Dr. H n2
So...which is it Bugs?
|
|
|
and actually the first one was me just derping, that should've been syllo and dr. h.
kita is not confirmed.
|
which is great right, cause the two confirmed people are dead!
|
So you're saying that the question you were answering was "who are confirmed townies" and not "who have you protected each night"? Because the question I asked was the second one.
|
On March 03 2012 08:55 VisceraEyes wrote:
So you're saying that the question you were answering was "who are confirmed townies" and not "who have you protected each night"? Because the question I asked was the second one.
I answered that question in the same post, you even quoted it. You asked me two things: who are the confirmed townies, and who are the protections.
If you're claiming I contradicted myself in literally the same thought train, then that's ridiculous.
And up to this point I've kept thinking kita is confirmed, because I had no reason to believe I was roleblocked. I'm still not over the fact that I so blindly considered him town when he fished for my role and I outted myself.
|
On March 03 2012 08:14 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 03 2012 08:05 VisceraEyes wrote:
WBG - who have you protected each night? The fact that you claimed Weak Doctor (a role I'm assuming kills you if you protect scum?) means that you should have a laundry list of confirmed townies over the course of the game right? Why claim with no list? WTF? because it's only two people; syllo, and kita. based on the fact that kita straight up claimed my role (without the doctor part) and then proceeded to ask the thread "are there any protective roles left" means he's just fishing as scum to see if there are any blues he doesn't know about. I claimed weak doctor to him and I gave him my night actions; syllo n1, Dr. H n2 and kita n3.
it's just a typo.
why would I say kita is confirmed town in this post after just telling you he's not?
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Don't bother letting him spam the thread. Bugs had me as a confirmed townie, yet still decided to vote toad even though I informed everyone that he was town. Knowing that it was 6v4 and a single misplaced town vote would end the game, he still chose to go against me, even though I was confirmed to him.
|
I don't know, that's what I'm trying to figure out.
On March 03 2012 08:16 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 03 2012 08:11 kitaman27 wrote:He doesn't have one lol. We already argued with each other over this in the quicktopic. He claims to have protected syllo n1, me n2 and n3 His fake claim doesn't even work out due to this quote: On February 24 2012 06:59 wherebugsgo wrote:
If I die, 100% kill Dr. H.
A weak doctor breadcrumbs his checks because if he dies and flips weak doctor then town has a confirmed red, Instead he is telling us to lynch DrH if he dies. What kind of weak doctor tells town to lynch someone, knowing that he could be protecting a scum syllo and cause a mislynch. On February 28 2012 07:33 kitaman27 wrote:On February 28 2012 04:41 wherebugsgo wrote:
@RoL: you're fucking lucky Toad scumslipped so hard, or I'd be pushing you like there's no tomorrow. All you do is lurk lurk lurk and then make excuses for your inactivity. That's exactly what you did when we were teammates in Couples Therapy and it's what you did (IIRC) in Purgatory as well. "gosh darnnit, I'd really love to vote for you RoL, but all these townies are just so easy to push" Remember this one? Despite my green check on toad, you STILL decided to vote toad. You claimed to me that you protected me from a hit. You confirmed in the thread that I couldn't be scum. AND YET YOU WOULD STILL RATHER VOTE TOAD OVER ROL INSISTING THAT THE CONFIRMED NONSCUM WAS LYING. Oh right, you're scum. Why am I responding to you? I already explained why I said what I said about Dr. H and it had literally nothing to do with my role and everything to do with LoTR. It's a great thing for scum to point out though, since it's probably the biggest mistake I've made all game (and I've made quite a few so far)
It seems to me that you protecting DocH n2 would mean that what you said about DrH would very much have everything to do with you role and nothing to do with LotR.
|
Hey Kita,
I want to finish the question I had before thst I never got around to finishing. Why did you have me so high up on your list? I could understand protecting toad, but why was I so high up.
|
On March 03 2012 09:06 VisceraEyes wrote:I don't know, that's what I'm trying to figure out. Show nested quote +On March 03 2012 08:16 wherebugsgo wrote:On March 03 2012 08:11 kitaman27 wrote:He doesn't have one lol. We already argued with each other over this in the quicktopic. He claims to have protected syllo n1, me n2 and n3 His fake claim doesn't even work out due to this quote: On February 24 2012 06:59 wherebugsgo wrote:
If I die, 100% kill Dr. H.
A weak doctor breadcrumbs his checks because if he dies and flips weak doctor then town has a confirmed red, Instead he is telling us to lynch DrH if he dies. What kind of weak doctor tells town to lynch someone, knowing that he could be protecting a scum syllo and cause a mislynch. On February 28 2012 07:33 kitaman27 wrote:On February 28 2012 04:41 wherebugsgo wrote:
@RoL: you're fucking lucky Toad scumslipped so hard, or I'd be pushing you like there's no tomorrow. All you do is lurk lurk lurk and then make excuses for your inactivity. That's exactly what you did when we were teammates in Couples Therapy and it's what you did (IIRC) in Purgatory as well. "gosh darnnit, I'd really love to vote for you RoL, but all these townies are just so easy to push" Remember this one? Despite my green check on toad, you STILL decided to vote toad. You claimed to me that you protected me from a hit. You confirmed in the thread that I couldn't be scum. AND YET YOU WOULD STILL RATHER VOTE TOAD OVER ROL INSISTING THAT THE CONFIRMED NONSCUM WAS LYING. Oh right, you're scum. Why am I responding to you? I already explained why I said what I said about Dr. H and it had literally nothing to do with my role and everything to do with LoTR. It's a great thing for scum to point out though, since it's probably the biggest mistake I've made all game (and I've made quite a few so far) It seems to me that you protecting DocH n2 would mean that what you said about DrH would very much have everything to do with you role and nothing to do with LotR.
no, retard.
learn to read. I said that about Dr. H on NIGHT ONE, when I protected syllo.
|
On March 03 2012 09:02 kitaman27 wrote:
Don't bother letting him spam the thread. Bugs had me as a confirmed townie, yet still decided to vote toad even though I informed everyone that he was town. Knowing that it was 6v4 and a single misplaced town vote would end the game, he still chose to go against me, even though I was confirmed to him.
yes, because of the shit you were saying in the QT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
