EPTOn February 07 2012 05:59 Palmar wrote:
So if you spam, can we hang radfield on meta?
So if you spam, can we hang radfield on meta?
Go away. I'm actively lurking
BC's Arkham City - Page 19
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
Go away. I'm actively lurking | ||
|
Jayjay54
Germany2296 Posts
On February 07 2012 06:02 layabout wrote: He normally posts about a page day1, it is not unusual for him to post very little. he is typically aggressive. he has only ever been town he absolutely hates it when you try to "meta" him. Here is a post i made when i was scum about him in a game in which he looked sorta scummy but was town: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=298603¤tpage=32#630 his previous games (which you may want to look at) Election mafia (town) Tl Mafia XLVII (town) Steamship (Tl mafia 46) (town) Newbie mini mafia (town) TL Mafia XLV (town) Hammer mini Mafia (town) wow, thanks dude. I tried to find old games, but it's kind of pointless to randomly click games. gonna have a look now. rad: actively lurking is even more scummy than lurking itself. step up bro | ||
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On February 07 2012 05:51 Jackal58 wrote: Ebwop - It is risk.nuke that posted "confirm" and then nothing else. If he remains afk for 24 hours I'd have no problem killing him. So, you're a fan of lynching lurkers? Or is this purely based on his meta? I really dislike going off of purely meta. And just the statement here bothers me. If he remains afk for half our day then he wants to kill him. Waiting 24 more hours and if he doesn't post having him modkilled should be the best idea. Especially because if we pressure the lurker and he never posts well we've lost a lot of information we could have gained going on someone else. I learned this because of Intrigue. Thanks Intrigue. -.- | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
Are You dying N1 Radfield? | ||
|
Jayjay54
Germany2296 Posts
On February 07 2012 06:09 Jayjay54 wrote: wow, thanks dude. I tried to find old games, but it's kind of pointless to randomly click games. gonna have a look now. rad: actively lurking is even more scummy than lurking itself. step up bro EBWOP: Oh, I was talking about rad, not nuke guess that was a misunderstanding. | ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
Are You a betting man Kurumi? | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
Well, given Your short history every game some time ago.. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On February 07 2012 05:59 Palmar wrote: So if you spam, can we hang radfield on meta? You can hang Radfield on a meat hook for all I care. The only person here harder to figure out early in a game than me is him. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On February 07 2012 06:09 Liquid`Sheth wrote: So, you're a fan of lynching lurkers? Or is this purely based on his meta? I really dislike going off of purely meta. And just the statement here bothers me. If he remains afk for half our day then he wants to kill him. Waiting 24 more hours and if he doesn't post having him modkilled should be the best idea. Especially because if we pressure the lurker and he never posts well we've lost a lot of information we could have gained going on someone else. I learned this because of Intrigue. Thanks Intrigue. -.- I'm a bigger fan of lynching scum. Activity =/= alignment. Sometimes it can be used as an additional factor but I'm not a fan of lynching people based on activity alone. I have no problem with using Meta on day 1 however. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
##Unvote: kitaman27 Now for the good stuff. VisceraEyes Lynch List of Accuracy layabout - For criticizing others play as being non-contributory, yet contributes nothing of substance himself. Any idea who he thinks is scum? Me either. Katina - Again, criticizing others for not contributing, but not contributing. Masquerading doesn't count guys - you actually have to do something. kitaman27 - Kita appears to be doing something akin to scumhunting, and because he's a veteran, I'm willing to wait on his lynch - however, I think he's scum because he appealed to Forumite's suspicion of me to try and get a bandwagon started, but never even really voted for me…just stinks and I don't like it. But again, Kita is my weakest read at this point and I wouldn't be butthurt if we didn't lynch him today. Also, Palmar is mistaken - lynching me is totally NOT always a net-gain for town. He's saying this because he's a prick. So, there you have it. ##Vote: layabout | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On February 07 2012 06:36 VisceraEyes wrote:"layabout - For criticizing others play as being non-contributory, yet contributes nothing of substance himself". Any idea who he thinks is scum? Me either bold: evidence please Perhaps you are referring to when i said: "there has been a lot of discussion about very little, please cut it out." or maybe: "maybe you should read through some of his old games and then come back and apologise for wasting our time." i also criticised excessive early voting. i feel that you are deliberately mis-interpreting my posts. underlined: that applies to far too many people to be the basis for a lynch. In fact the content you are provided suggers that you yourself do not have a clue about who is scum. At least i have the decency to not waste peoples time with fluff or tedious walls-of-text explaining weak/stupid reads that i cannot stand by. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On February 07 2012 01:45 layabout wrote: Kita, how can batman claim his hits without claiming and being modkilled? + there has been a lot of discussion about very little, please cut it out. This was, in fact, the post I was referring to. While it's not as overt as Katina's repetition, it's still calling out people who aren't contributing, while contributing gems such as + Show Spoiler + if anybody need help organising their thoughts i have a pretty useful MS paint template: ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/Q9mkP.png) I get the joke, I get it. You're saying you don't know who's scum...but it's not contributing ANYTHING to the thread while you're criticizing the play of others (tedious walls-of-text explaining weak/stupid reads). Tell me what that picture was supposed to add to town's hunt for scum please layabout. Are the names organized in some sort of way? Do the names above the key mean anything? Below? What was the POINT of that post other than to get a laugh out of town? If there WAS no point, then don't say you "have the decency to not waste peoples time with fluff". | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
And we kill docH because he's catwoman | ||
|
Tunkeg
Norway1235 Posts
Bill Murray Just fluff, a silly massclaim proposal (must be a joke) and a weakass vote for kenpachi. layabout He is just beeing his lovely sarcastic self. Thus far he have only been posting smirk comments and useless crap. As I know him from Student mafia, he is a total prick, but that is ok, because he actually was playing a great town game. This time around he is just a useless prick. Time to step up man? Palmar The guy with the biggest ego on the whole internetz. Also just posting crap and beeing an ass in general thus far. Basicly just OMGUS'ing everyone and trolling around. His longest fucking post is the lyrics of Don't you cry tonight, rest is just crap. He have been the one sucking the most today, and thats why I give him the Fluffer of the day award. + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/M2qA2.jpg) | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On February 07 2012 07:13 Cyber_Cheese wrote: alright, new plan, if hugo winds up dead, the joker comes forward. And we kill docH because he's catwoman What the hell are You trying to force a modkill or something also, brilliant plan, too bad it's only one sentence... No. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
the names above the key are there because there was no room below the key. that picture will become my primary tool for scumhunting in this and quite likely furture games. it is similar in essence to a Nisani "node graph" but is better because it is in paint. You also prompted me to add a new section for those players that i just cannot read I present Arkham city V 2.0.1.png: + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/i9O8W.png) | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On February 07 2012 07:19 layabout wrote: glad you asked: the names above the key are there because there was no room below the key. that picture will become my primary tool for scumhunting in this and quite likely furture games. it is similar in essence to a Nisani "node graph" but is better because it is in paint. You also prompted me to add a new section for those players that i just cannot read I present Arkham city V 2.0.1.png: + Show Spoiler + Cute. Now die scum. | ||
|
Tunkeg
Norway1235 Posts
On February 07 2012 07:19 layabout wrote: glad you asked: the names above the key are there because there was no room below the key. that picture will become my primary tool for scumhunting in this and quite likely furture games. it is similar in essence to a Nisani "node graph" but is better because it is in paint. You also prompted me to add a new section for those players that i just cannot read I present Arkham city V 2.0.1.png: + Show Spoiler + Is this some new crap like your Bullshitformula in Purgetory where you were scum? | ||
|
Slardar
Canada7596 Posts
| ||
|
Tunkeg
Norway1235 Posts
On February 07 2012 07:23 Slardar wrote: *unrelated to this game* TUNKEG - You better edit out that picture, before you get the hammer in the nuts. Why, it is a real trophy received at a golf tournement. If it is offensive I will ask the host of the game of permission to delete it though. | ||
| ||
