|
On February 06 2012 15:31 Katina wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 15:22 Liquid`Sheth wrote:On February 06 2012 15:15 Katina wrote:
I wasn't sure if he was being a noob or being serious. I don't think it really means anything. Pretty much everything is something that matters. I'm not sure it matters too much, but its definitely something to look at and think on a little bit imo. I find it peculiar how you're able to use so many words yet say so little in the process
On February 06 2012 15:41 Katina wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 15:39 Liquid`Sheth wrote:On February 06 2012 15:35 Bill Murray wrote:
I disagree with you. Sheth was questioning the validity of claiming there. It truly is weak play. It's like leaving a zealot on the wrong side of the map, out of the equation, when you're going into battle.
However, there is another side to WIFOM, but are both glasses poisoned? So, Bill -- Zealots on the wrong side of the map are good. They are like little scouting strong pillars of Zerg death. Zealots are never on the wrong side of the map. Does this mean you are calling yourself a zealot? And would you be up for poisoning yourself? Considering if you don't drink from either of the glasses you would probably die of thirst. In the case that either way you die, would you drink both glasses to have a quicker death? Or would you only drink one and not overdose on the poison in hopes you may be saved? I think these bring up valid questions. And I hope you will feel my play isn't weak after this. .... I find it peculiar how you're able to use so many words yet say so little in the process
What I find peculiar is how you're able to repeat yourself while saying so little in the process. Are you getting scummy vibes off Sheth? You pickin up a lil red tinge there?
|
I had a wall typed up, but I don't want to clutter the thread with idle chatter.
Sheth, I was calling the claim weak, brother. You are in no way weak.
|
I propose no more question askings individual to individual, only statements of factual information, or propositions to the group as a whole
|
That being said, I want to massclaim. It really backs scum up into having to fake names. It's a video game/fictional universe, how many characters are there, or would I be surprised?
|
United States2095 Posts
@Bill I agree that idle chatter is not very helpful. As such just direct answers before I go to sleep. I like question asking individual to individual, or at least finding out how one person feels towards another. Doing write ups about each person for instance is a very important part of the game imo. As for mass claiming, Nooooooooooooooooooo. Unless you want to get banned.
On February 06 2012 05:33 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 05:26 kitaman27 wrote:
To what degree is the no role claiming of Batman/Cat Woman enforced? Are they allowed to hint at their role without directly claiming? Are they allowed to claim their hits? Is town allowed to identify the third party roles by forcing a mass batman claim, where the only person not allowed to claim is revealed? They claim at any point in time they are modkilled. If they hint their role and I catch it they are modkilled. They can claim hits, they can claim who they checked. Anyone who attempts to force a mass batman or catwoman claim will be banned after game concludes and both batman/catwoman in that circumstance may claim their role. Same general rules apply as last game in this regard. It comes down to, anyone who attempts to exploit or circumvent a rule will be punished. On that note. I will be firing out roles within the next 20-30 minutes, game will start between 10 and 11 pm est tonight.
|
On February 06 2012 15:47 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 15:31 Katina wrote:On February 06 2012 15:22 Liquid`Sheth wrote:On February 06 2012 15:15 Katina wrote:
I wasn't sure if he was being a noob or being serious. I don't think it really means anything. Pretty much everything is something that matters. I'm not sure it matters too much, but its definitely something to look at and think on a little bit imo. I find it peculiar how you're able to use so many words yet say so little in the process Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 15:41 Katina wrote:On February 06 2012 15:39 Liquid`Sheth wrote:On February 06 2012 15:35 Bill Murray wrote:
I disagree with you. Sheth was questioning the validity of claiming there. It truly is weak play. It's like leaving a zealot on the wrong side of the map, out of the equation, when you're going into battle.
However, there is another side to WIFOM, but are both glasses poisoned? So, Bill -- Zealots on the wrong side of the map are good. They are like little scouting strong pillars of Zerg death. Zealots are never on the wrong side of the map. Does this mean you are calling yourself a zealot? And would you be up for poisoning yourself? Considering if you don't drink from either of the glasses you would probably die of thirst. In the case that either way you die, would you drink both glasses to have a quicker death? Or would you only drink one and not overdose on the poison in hopes you may be saved? I think these bring up valid questions. And I hope you will feel my play isn't weak after this. .... I find it peculiar how you're able to use so many words yet say so little in the process What I find peculiar is how you're able to repeat yourself while saying so little in the process. Are you getting scummy vibes off Sheth? You pickin up a lil red tinge there?
As Bill Murray said, I merely bring forth statements of factual information.
|
On February 06 2012 15:52 Bill Murray wrote:
That being said, I want to massclaim. It really backs scum up into having to fake names. It's a video game/fictional universe, how many characters are there, or would I be surprised?
no.
also:
On January 24 2012 14:08 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Cheating:
11. Breadcrumbing the specific phrasing of your role PM. Do not compare the phrasing in your role PM to prove your alignment. You can claim the abilities you have, but you can't use the specific phrasing of your role PM.
thats why.
|
Also I would like to reiterate what Dr. H said, dont talk about batman/catwoman for now. It only distracts us from scumhunting.
|
I really love how Dr. H tells everyone to not talk about Batman/Catwoman and then proceeds to post a half page of text on nothing but third party strategy. That's not hypocritical or anything -_-
On February 06 2012 15:58 Katina wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 15:47 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 06 2012 15:31 Katina wrote:On February 06 2012 15:22 Liquid`Sheth wrote:On February 06 2012 15:15 Katina wrote:
I wasn't sure if he was being a noob or being serious. I don't think it really means anything. Pretty much everything is something that matters. I'm not sure it matters too much, but its definitely something to look at and think on a little bit imo. I find it peculiar how you're able to use so many words yet say so little in the process On February 06 2012 15:41 Katina wrote:On February 06 2012 15:39 Liquid`Sheth wrote:On February 06 2012 15:35 Bill Murray wrote:
I disagree with you. Sheth was questioning the validity of claiming there. It truly is weak play. It's like leaving a zealot on the wrong side of the map, out of the equation, when you're going into battle.
However, there is another side to WIFOM, but are both glasses poisoned? So, Bill -- Zealots on the wrong side of the map are good. They are like little scouting strong pillars of Zerg death. Zealots are never on the wrong side of the map. Does this mean you are calling yourself a zealot? And would you be up for poisoning yourself? Considering if you don't drink from either of the glasses you would probably die of thirst. In the case that either way you die, would you drink both glasses to have a quicker death? Or would you only drink one and not overdose on the poison in hopes you may be saved? I think these bring up valid questions. And I hope you will feel my play isn't weak after this. .... I find it peculiar how you're able to use so many words yet say so little in the process What I find peculiar is how you're able to repeat yourself while saying so little in the process. Are you getting scummy vibes off Sheth? You pickin up a lil red tinge there? As Bill Murray said, I merely bring forth statements of factual information.
whose smurf are you and why are you already annoying me with useless trash?
|
|
|
OOPS. I was talking to hiro.
|
Kenpachi's claim means absolutely nothing, just like it does every game...
Sheth's gotta be scum, look at all that useless filler, and the games only just started.
My activities going to be sub par for the next 16~24 hours, sorry in advance.
Should be right after that though.
I disagree with DocH, who's to know if batman/catwoman are going to shoot accurately.
That's not a risk I want to take, when we could reduce overall KP and give ourselves more time to analyse instead.
To kick off some real discussion.
I'd like to discuss the Joker claiming ASAP.
Sure he dies overnight, but then we have batman as essentially a buffed up version of the same role from that night until the gf dies.
Catwoman's targets on the other hand, where do we balance a known two townie deaths vs potentially a lot more as the game drags on?
|
As a side note, if you don't want a topic discussed, add in a topic that will create discussion in it's place.
|
Way to go claiming Joker. Don't do that. We lose one vig for .,.... nothing, cuz Batman is helping us regardless of the situation. And his task isn't to shoot scum, it's to shoot 1 particular scum. He won't risk giving off info for the sake of helping town, he's 3rd party after all and only cares for his win. It's likely he'll DT ppl till he finds Hugo.And he can't hint at being batman at all.
Anyone who claims being town or any blue D1 should be considered for a lynch.It's stupid,useless,and full of WIFOM-Helps scum a ton.
For the lack of a proper Random Voting Stage, I vote Kenpachi.
Considering the current situation, it's justified and if it goes through, we'll have info at least. There's no mayoral elections so setup chat and strategies shouldn't make scum stick out too much in the thread. This, instead will.
I feel Day 1 someone always gets lynched for beingcarelessandthat someone is almost always a townie.So, it doesn't do any harm at all to ramp the pressure now instead of later in the day when we will be hard-pressed for time and are likely to make hasty decisions.
|
|
|
On February 06 2012 16:50 rgTheSchworz wrote:
Way to go claiming Joker. Don't do that. We lose one vig for .,.... nothing, cuz Batman is helping us regardless of the situation. And his task isn't to shoot scum, it's to shoot 1 particular scum. He won't risk giving off info for the sake of helping town, he's 3rd party after all and only cares for his win. It's likely he'll DT ppl till he finds Hugo.And he can't hint at being batman at all.
Anyone who claims being town or any blue D1 should be considered for a lynch.It's stupid,useless,and full of WIFOM-Helps scum a ton.
For the lack of a proper Random Voting Stage, I vote Kenpachi.
Considering the current situation, it's justified and if it goes through, we'll have info at least. There's no mayoral elections so setup chat and strategies shouldn't make scum stick out too much in the thread. This, instead will.
I feel Day 1 someone always gets lynched for beingcarelessandthat someone is almost always a townie.So, it doesn't do any harm at all to ramp the pressure now instead of later in the day when we will be hard-pressed for time and are likely to make hasty decisions.
If town wins after the jokers dead, Batman wins too.
Sure we could attempt to win without the aid of the neutrals, but why not use every advantage we can get?
Any sensible Batman would work with us, because if he kills someone, the town knows the flip, and that's many more people on Batman's side trying to hunt the 'all precious' Hugo.
|
On February 06 2012 16:50 rgTheSchworz wrote:
Anyone who claims being town or any blue D1 should be considered for a lynch.It's stupid,useless,and full of WIFOM-Helps scum a ton.
How exactly is that helping scum, and if it's truely helping scum so much, why did you call it a random vote?
##Vote rgTheSchworz
|
Scum know that he's not lying . We can't know that.
It's a random vote. Random votes don't help scum. They help us get info from reactions to that random vote
I can't possibly know at this stage if Kenpachi is scum, but I voted him to get things going.
|
I personally doubt that he's a blue trying to hide by claiming green, so scum know his role already. Terribad for us.
|
On February 06 2012 17:17 rgTheSchworz wrote:
Scum know that he's not lying . We can't know that.
It's a random vote. Random votes don't help scum. They help us get info from reactions to that random vote
I can't possibly know at this stage if Kenpachi is scum, but I voted him to get things going.
On February 06 2012 17:18 rgTheSchworz wrote:
I personally doubt that he's a blue trying to hide by claiming green, so scum know his role already. Terribad for us.
Contradicting yourself already?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
