|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
So.... Well. Look at those townie and mafiosos counts. What a great time to join my first game!
This is how I feel:
+ Show Spoiler +
On December 02 2011 13:56 vaderseven wrote:
Is there any player on any side of the table that wants to play this out or can we do a mass vote for draw lol.
There aren't many of us we can trust. But you can trust me. I am Blazinghand. I am new. I am bonifaceviii the 2nd, bonifacieix, if you would.
I've read the whole thread. Yes, the whole thread. Assuming we popped all our vigis, lurker vigis, and mad hatters, we have very little breathing room. Apparently, we may even have 0 breathing room.
Even so, we must press on, for Justice demands it, in all of her glory and all of her horror.
On December 02 2011 13:17 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On December 02 2011 13:15 Erandorr wrote:
We got 2 confirmed scum each day for quite a bit. That can get us some breething room at least. Breathing room only if they shoot blocked targets or we have kp still. We are down what? 5 kp roles now? and 1 apparently shot so 5 killed without using power 1 still alive and bulletless. How much more could we have =\
On December 02 2011 13:02 wherebugsgo wrote:
I'm leaving this thread until I have a good reason to come back, since there's nothing left I can say that will change the pace of the game right now. We gain no new information by lynching Ciryandor and Kenpachi, or any two of the more-or-less confirmed scum at this point. 3 days with no real information, 3 days where the scum we haven't yet caught can slip by looking more town-like. We mess up once and this game is over. Yet, we can't actually do anything anymore to ensure that we don't slip.
I'd like to play toward my win con but even mathematically this is nearly impossible.
Nearly impossible isn't the same as impossible-- we still have an opportunity for luck via a Mad Hatter or something similar.
We lost 1x DT, 2x Lurk Vig, 1x Vet, 1x BG, but we also got rid of a Miller-- this may mean there's only one left, or zero left?? Given that two died in the first day No Hatters have died, and we have enough solid scum leads that we're unlikely to mess up in the next day or two, assuming most Town players vote together.
At the very least, we should try to find out what we can about who's mafia and who's not. Rather notably, there's a lot of room for us to be lucky. We've still got n medic/rolebockers, so even though we lack KP, we may be able to mitigate some of theirs.
Also, WBG, we need you. If there's any way out of this, it's via excellent analysis and argumentation. I've seen you pull rabbits out of glass hats. Your withdrawal means either you're Towne affiliated and have resigned yourself to a day of bandwagon without legitimate discussion, or your Mafia affiliated and are trying to step out of the spotlight.
First Order of Business: Voteswitchers need to die. This is our best bet to catch mafia, and it would be a travesty not to vote for them. Non-voteswitch Mafia will be bussing, and those who are already caught will just try to cause mischief. Don't listen to them. Actions speak louder than words, and these people have spoken via their vote, speaking "i am a mafia please kill me". Accurately.
##Vote: Kenpachi
##Vote: Ciryandor
Obvious scum is obvious.
Second Order of Business: WBG is a solid analyst. Medics should be on him like white on rice, because our Sheriff can't prot him twice in a row. Ideally, we want to force the Mafia to burn every bullet they have for the night on him, or not attack him at all. WBG has been remarkably consistent, and despite his occasional mistakes, has been trying to help the discussion and generally acting Town. We need him. Failing that, we can "get lucky" with several medic prots on him cancelling some mafia shots and adding to the number of turns we have alive, even if he falls.
P.S.: Soap wtf are you doing. Please explain your votes that aren't Ken/Ciry.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 02 2011 15:43 Blazinghand wrote:
So.... Well. Look at those townie and mafiosos counts. What a great time to join my first game!
SNIP
P.S.: Soap wtf are you doing. Please explain your votes that aren't Ken/Ciry.
EBWOP: nvm, Soap is obvious scum. currently working off of this list:
On December 02 2011 11:44 wherebugsgo wrote:Kill These Please
Serejai
Sprungjeezy
Kenpachi
vaderseven
Ciryandor
prplhz
Coagulation (meta)
Erandorr
Mattchew
Steveling
Soap
AmericanUmlaut
deconduo
bumatlarge
gg nore goodbye Lemon, you will not be missed. Bastard.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 02 2011 15:48 intrigue wrote:
you read the entire thread in what, 4 hours? wtf
why are you so responsible and dedicated?
Check out the the game queue-- i've been reading this game, and going through previous games for some time, since the queue's been blocked.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
Yeah that's right come at me bro what now I'm a tryhard
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 02 2011 16:26 Blazinghand wrote:
Yeah that's right come at me bro what now I'm a tryhard
And by this I mean,
Intrigue, It seems you're voting for V7 and Ciry right now. Why V7 and not Kenpachi? Granted, V7 is certainly skum, but I'd rather we consolidate our votes to reduce the liability of someone else getting lynched. We can do V7 tmr imo
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 02 2011 16:27 wherebugsgo wrote:
are you the one who said he read Mini X?
I think this guy's legit. Good first post btw.
Sorry that I'm completely demoralized. But playing LoL helps my heart hurt less ^^
Yeah. Man WBG you're smooth as butter. I'm glad you're playing hella towne. WE NEED YOU MAN.
I mean, I get why you're demoralized. I guess the big thing is, what should we do now? Try to engage scum and force slipups? Run some filters on specific people? Point me at someone plz.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
mcht (becomes marserblood)
verdict: terrible townie
He makes three posts total.
On November 24 2011 23:05 mcht wrote:hey guys, first game of mafia ever  i think palmar is right about us having to do the first step/taking the first risk, if we just wait or dont trust anyone scum will win for sure, ignoring all posts he is 80% town, so if our chances of winning with palmar as town and everbody trusting him are better than 5:3 we're ok even if he wins everytime he is mafia, would that be realistic ? especially in the beginning i think you can never be 100% sure about someone but the worst thing for town is to get stuck in only accusations flying around because someone could be mafia. yeah everybody could be, that's the essence of this game but at some points in the game a rational portion of trust is required for town to win in my opinion, i read some games and saw a lot of townies ripping each other apart over semantics etc  so im voting palmar, he seems to be pretty active and operates on logic, not spouting too much nonsense :D you should probably not rely on my analysis since it could be majorly flawed xD
First post is wishwash, dodging, noncommmital, claiming on analysis is flawed.
On November 24 2011 23:25 mcht wrote:if you have a fear of making a mistake, you're probably scum right ?
On November 24 2011 23:29 mcht wrote:if you would be elected and you are scum, how would you say are towns chances of winning ?
Second and third Posts are both utterly worthless one-liners.
Normally, I'd say this is scum. However, it was his first game, and he literally posted all his game posts in the span of 20 minutes before leaving, never to be seen again. He's just terrible and never played before. When he comes back as MarserBlood he makes this post:
On December 02 2011 12:59 MarserBlood wrote:
Hello everyone,
First time I play this game online and I replace one at a moment it's tough to win.
Will be reading up the last bit now.
GL & HF
Stalling for a lurk excuse, or typical noob? looks like typical noob to me.
Terrible Townie
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 02 2011 16:36 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
I think we can assume all the replacements are townie, a balanced game would have modkilled at least one scum if it were possible.
Why do you have a vote on Steveling? move it somewhere more sueful plz
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 02 2011 16:36 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
I think we can assume all the replacements are townie, a balanced game would have modkilled at least one scum if it were possible.
Why do you have a vote on Steveling? move it somewhere more sueful plz
EBWOP: USEFUL
plz reply
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 02 2011 16:50 intrigue wrote:
why would mafia offer a draw, if town seems so fucked? maybe our lists are just perfect
I agree. This is blood in the water.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 02 2011 16:52 Cyber_Cheese wrote:Show nested quote +On December 02 2011 16:50 Blazinghand wrote:On December 02 2011 16:36 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
I think we can assume all the replacements are townie, a balanced game would have modkilled at least one scum if it were possible. Why do you have a vote on Steveling? move it somewhere more sueful plz EBWOP: USEFUL plz reply Go through my filter, I believe he's one of the best lynch choices.
So Do I, and yet you don't see me giving the mafia a goddamn chance by taking votes away form the two frontrunners who are obvious scum. get in line-- we'll get to steveling, but not today. Don't risk it all.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 02 2011 16:57 Cyber_Cheese wrote:Show nested quote +On December 02 2011 16:54 Blazinghand wrote:On December 02 2011 16:52 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On December 02 2011 16:50 Blazinghand wrote:On December 02 2011 16:36 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
I think we can assume all the replacements are townie, a balanced game would have modkilled at least one scum if it were possible. Why do you have a vote on Steveling? move it somewhere more sueful plz EBWOP: USEFUL plz reply Go through my filter, I believe he's one of the best lynch choices. So Do I, and yet you don't see me giving the mafia a goddamn chance by taking votes away form the two frontrunners who are obvious scum. get in line-- we'll get to steveling, but not today. Don't risk it all. There is half of the game on each candidate, it's not like we are scrounging around for volunteers.
So your reasoning for your Steveling vote is "well, we're not gonna lynch him today, but i just want my vote to have no chance of being useful"?
Obviously not. i am putting words in your mouth. I'd rather YOU put words in your mouth. please explain how your steveling vote is helpful (not correct, btu helpful)
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 02 2011 16:46 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
The mafia has offered a draw. The town will vote on whether to accept their offer. Please PM your vote to the hosts, make the title either "Accept" or "Decline." If a majority accept then this game will be declared a draw.
Majority who vote, or majority in general?
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
Steveling you're not even a townie how can you vote no to the draw
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
WBG: I see you're voting for V7 and K-pac. Consider moving your V7 vote to Ciry so we can consolidate onto unassailable lynches. In fact, please do so. V7 won't be lynched today so let's focus on K-pac and Ciry
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
Do not vote to accept the draw. If the mafia are offering it, it's because they're worried. Otherwise they'd wait until we lynch a townie and crush us.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
just FYI definitely vote V7 tmr. God he's annoying.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
My votes are cast; I'm off to bed, and I'll be checking in at lunch. Play nice, gentlehombres.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
Player: Soap
Verdict: Scum
Soap is a first-time player. He opens with
+ Show Spoiler +On November 26 2011 10:44 Soap wrote:
Ugh, there's so little information and scum are free to bury any tell under piles of nonsense and fingerpointing, as I'm sure it's being done. This will be most valuable in retrospective and I feel town should simulate a close vote to entice mafia to root for their candidate(s), but Palmer flew away in the popularity contest. So I'm protest voting for sinani206. On November 26 2011 12:17 Soap wrote:That is: use the [ date] tag Show nested quote +[ date]June 22 2010 12:00 GMT[ /date]
Tuesday, Jun 22 9:00am BRT (GMT-03:00)
Converts a date to the viewers timezone. On November 26 2011 12:15 Soap wrote:
Use the [unparsable timestamp format]
Tuesday, Jun 22 9:00am BRT (GMT-03:00)
Converts a date to the viewers timezone.
Worthless posts. Note how he's trying to appear helpful without actually adding anything to the discussion. WBG and Palmer call him out for this. WBG mostly says he's a useless lurker. His responses:
+ Show Spoiler +On November 27 2011 11:52 Soap wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2011 11:05 wherebugsgo wrote:3. SoapOne game-relevant post. Two posts about timestamps. Useless. Again, an excellent lurker-bane shot. Sorry if I didn't make myself clear in my first post. As a newbie I know nothing metagame, which is about everything this early. If I go out of my way to catch up with the veterans, bad analysis would harm town and good analysis would make mafia drop me in ten seconds flat. Once we have actual hard data to put against what I'm witnessing first hand I can make myself useful. On November 27 2011 12:19 Soap wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2011 11:56 Palmar wrote:On November 27 2011 11:52 Soap wrote:On November 27 2011 11:05 wherebugsgo wrote:3. SoapOne game-relevant post. Two posts about timestamps. Useless. Again, an excellent lurker-bane shot. Sorry if I didn't make myself clear in my first post. As a newbie I know nothing metagame, which is about everything this early. If I go out of my way to catch up with the veterans, bad analysis would harm town and good analysis would make mafia drop me in ten seconds flat. Once we have actual hard data to put against what I'm witnessing first hand I can make myself useful. You say the bolded part as if it's a bad thing... Always, always, always be open and transparent. If you haven't noticed yet I'm being super lenient with newbies this game, I always give them the benefit of the doubt. I call their logic bad without calling them scum, so even if you do stupid shit, you're not fucked, as long as you're willing to improve. Uh, you mean I should volunteer to be sacrificial lamb? If I do stupid shit mafia would rather have me alive.
Excuses, no commitment, and most of all, no real attempts to do anything useful.
And then, he's silent for a couple of days, before the "lol everyone swap votes at the last minute" debacle. He did not swap votes at the last minute, but he voted ahead of time, and this was he votes for Risen and WBG, 3 hours before deadline. He made no posts in the discussion thread at this point. In the aftermath of the voteswitch...
On December 01 2011 08:01 Soap wrote:
Funny thing is I was intent on doing a last minute vote change to Palmar and BC, but my internet went out for the second night in a row like 2 hours before the deadline. Would be a totally different game.
How did the tie between BC and zeks was broken?
So let's think about this for a moment. Worthless, spam votes hidden in 3rd and 4th-placing people. Complete lack of any attempt at discussion. Explaining his "internet outage" as the reason for his voting pattern, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME ADMITTING HE WAS PLANNING ON A LAST MINUTE VOTE CHANGE...
One more thing. Soap's internet was not broken on the night of Wednesday, November the 30th. No, not at all. If it was, it must have been broken for a very narrow timeframe.
It was working the night before at 8 pm:
On November 30 2011 08:42 Soap wrote:I unvoted Hier, not wbg ##Unvote: Ace
##Vote: Risen
And it was working on the December 1st at 3 am:
What this indicates to me is that Soap's internet was working just fine. Why's that? Look at his post. This isn't a "I literally just logged in and wrote this" post. This is a "I was doing something, found a link that was broken, and decided to write about it over here" post. Soap, my friends, was active and online that night. If, in fact, Soap's internet was broken, it was broken for an extremely short period of time-- starting sometime within a couple hours before the deadline and stretching until just after.
After being, well, characteristically helpful, Soap returns to the thread:
On December 02 2011 10:27 Soap wrote:
Hai!
I first voted sandroba for mayor because Palmar pushed him and that would be stupid if he was scum, then I got fed up with the shallow campaigns and voted sinani for the lulz. Then wbg took over the thread with mostly lists and OMGUS (spammer = scum amirite?) but noone else seemed to bother so I grew disinterested in posting, but I've been following closely.
Pleask ask if there's something else I could fill.
On December 02 2011 10:30 Soap wrote:
##Vote: wherebugsgo
##Vote: BloodyC0bbler
Soap is either scum and trying to subvert our vote, or lying about having read the thread, or he'd be voting the way everyone else is. HE claims that he's been voting "for the lulz" and that he's lurking, and that those of us who contribute are scum and he is silent because he's not.
I don't buy it. My body is not a sturdy cardboard cylinder. My head is not made out of hard, sweetened candy.
I am not a sucker.
Soap is scum.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
Pro tip: when claiming your internet was broken, don't log into the site and post stuff ;_;
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 03 2011 03:07 Blazinghand wrote:
Pro tip: when claiming your internet was broken, don't log into the site and post stuff ;_;
EBWOP: ._.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
Oh I changed my smiley from ;_; to ._.
Also, as a point in Soap's favor: It's possible he's not scum since V7 isn't defending him. Is V7 bussing, or is one of these guys innocent?
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
Yeah big G knows what's up
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 03 2011 03:22 vaderseven wrote:
I think soap should have modlilled am I wrong there?
Soap is alive and well. He has voted in the most recent election, and is confirmed alive in the most recent player list.
46.) Soap
I would LIKE it that he were modkilled, but sadly, he lives on.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 03 2011 03:27 vaderseven wrote:
Has he posted though s what I mean. I can't see any today on my phonevat least...
His last post was under 24 hours ago, and contained nothing of value:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=285690¤tpage=236#4714
On December 02 2011 10:27 Soap wrote:
Hai!
I first voted sandroba for mayor because Palmar pushed him and that would be stupid if he was scum, then I got fed up with the shallow campaigns and voted sinani for the lulz. Then wbg took over the thread with mostly lists and OMGUS (spammer = scum amirite?) but noone else seemed to bother so I grew disinterested in posting, but I've been following closely.
Pleask ask if there's something else I could fill.
He voted at the same time, and this vote is current:
On December 02 2011 10:30 Soap wrote:
##Vote: wherebugsgo
##Vote: BloodyC0bbler
Again, nothing of value.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
I sincerely doubt he'll make any posts in this thread directly addressing these arguments. He will just lurk harder and hope we screw up a lynch somewhere.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
PS: V7 i'm gonna see if I can't put together an informative post about your actions as well. It'll give you the opportunity to try to prove your innocence.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
No don't worry I got dis
we just need to lynch perfectly
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 03 2011 03:37 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On December 03 2011 03:36 Blazinghand wrote:
No don't worry I got dis
we just need to lynch perfectly yeah...lol
and also medic perfectly. >.>
and hopefully we have a hatter and/or vig left somewhere.
Attention Hatters: get all your shit onto mafia guys. in case, you know, for whatever reason, you weren't doing that already.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
ACTUALLY WAIT. Does Soap qualify for lurker vigging?
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
We might still have lurker vigs
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
Yeah I know right these things can be hard toi figure out
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
Well, if that goes through we will find our shortly whether or not I'm an idiot. Given that there are 33 townies left, it'll take 17 to win a draw vote.
Even if everybody who has voted so far voted yes, it still wouldn't be there yet. At the very least VOTE you guys, cmon.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
Steveling you're not even a townie how can you vote yes to the draw
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
So, does anyone have any comments on my analysis so far? Analysis of their own? yes?
On December 02 2011 16:31 Blazinghand wrote:mcht (becomes marserblood)
verdict: terrible townieHe makes three posts total. Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 23:05 mcht wrote:hey guys, first game of mafia ever i think palmar is right about us having to do the first step/taking the first risk, if we just wait or dont trust anyone scum will win for sure, ignoring all posts he is 80% town, so if our chances of winning with palmar as town and everbody trusting him are better than 5:3 we're ok even if he wins everytime he is mafia, would that be realistic ? especially in the beginning i think you can never be 100% sure about someone but the worst thing for town is to get stuck in only accusations flying around because someone could be mafia. yeah everybody could be, that's the essence of this game but at some points in the game a rational portion of trust is required for town to win in my opinion, i read some games and saw a lot of townies ripping each other apart over semantics etc so im voting palmar, he seems to be pretty active and operates on logic, not spouting too much nonsense :D you should probably not rely on my analysis since it could be majorly flawed xD First post is wishwash, dodging, noncommmital, claiming on analysis is flawed. Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 23:25 mcht wrote:if you have a fear of making a mistake, you're probably scum right ? Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 23:29 mcht wrote:if you would be elected and you are scum, how would you say are towns chances of winning ? Second and third Posts are both utterly worthless one-liners. Normally, I'd say this is scum. However, it was his first game, and he literally posted all his game posts in the span of 20 minutes before leaving, never to be seen again. He's just terrible and never played before. When he comes back as MarserBlood he makes this post: Show nested quote +On December 02 2011 12:59 MarserBlood wrote:
Hello everyone,
First time I play this game online and I replace one at a moment it's tough to win.
Will be reading up the last bit now.
GL & HF
Stalling for a lurk excuse, or typical noob? looks like typical noob to me.
Terrible Townie
On December 03 2011 03:02 Blazinghand wrote:Player: Soap
Verdict: ScumSoap is a first-time player. He opens with + Show Spoiler +On November 26 2011 10:44 Soap wrote:
Ugh, there's so little information and scum are free to bury any tell under piles of nonsense and fingerpointing, as I'm sure it's being done. This will be most valuable in retrospective and I feel town should simulate a close vote to entice mafia to root for their candidate(s), but Palmer flew away in the popularity contest. So I'm protest voting for sinani206. On November 26 2011 12:17 Soap wrote:That is: use the [ date] tag Show nested quote +[ date]June 22 2010 12:00 GMT[ /date]
Tuesday, Jun 22 9:00am BRT (GMT-03:00)
Converts a date to the viewers timezone. On November 26 2011 12:15 Soap wrote:
Use the [unparsable timestamp format]
Tuesday, Jun 22 9:00am BRT (GMT-03:00)
Converts a date to the viewers timezone. Worthless posts. Note how he's trying to appear helpful without actually adding anything to the discussion. WBG and Palmer call him out for this. WBG mostly says he's a useless lurker. His responses: + Show Spoiler +On November 27 2011 11:52 Soap wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2011 11:05 wherebugsgo wrote:3. SoapOne game-relevant post. Two posts about timestamps. Useless. Again, an excellent lurker-bane shot. Sorry if I didn't make myself clear in my first post. As a newbie I know nothing metagame, which is about everything this early. If I go out of my way to catch up with the veterans, bad analysis would harm town and good analysis would make mafia drop me in ten seconds flat. Once we have actual hard data to put against what I'm witnessing first hand I can make myself useful. On November 27 2011 12:19 Soap wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2011 11:56 Palmar wrote:On November 27 2011 11:52 Soap wrote:On November 27 2011 11:05 wherebugsgo wrote:3. SoapOne game-relevant post. Two posts about timestamps. Useless. Again, an excellent lurker-bane shot. Sorry if I didn't make myself clear in my first post. As a newbie I know nothing metagame, which is about everything this early. If I go out of my way to catch up with the veterans, bad analysis would harm town and good analysis would make mafia drop me in ten seconds flat. Once we have actual hard data to put against what I'm witnessing first hand I can make myself useful. You say the bolded part as if it's a bad thing... Always, always, always be open and transparent. If you haven't noticed yet I'm being super lenient with newbies this game, I always give them the benefit of the doubt. I call their logic bad without calling them scum, so even if you do stupid shit, you're not fucked, as long as you're willing to improve. Uh, you mean I should volunteer to be sacrificial lamb? If I do stupid shit mafia would rather have me alive. Excuses, no commitment, and most of all, no real attempts to do anything useful. And then, he's silent for a couple of days, before the "lol everyone swap votes at the last minute" debacle. He did not swap votes at the last minute, but he voted ahead of time, and this was he votes for Risen and WBG, 3 hours before deadline. He made no posts in the discussion thread at this point. In the aftermath of the voteswitch... Show nested quote +On December 01 2011 08:01 Soap wrote:
Funny thing is I was intent on doing a last minute vote change to Palmar and BC, but my internet went out for the second night in a row like 2 hours before the deadline. Would be a totally different game.
How did the tie between BC and zeks was broken? So let's think about this for a moment. Worthless, spam votes hidden in 3rd and 4th-placing people. Complete lack of any attempt at discussion. Explaining his "internet outage" as the reason for his voting pattern, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME ADMITTING HE WAS PLANNING ON A LAST MINUTE VOTE CHANGE... One more thing. Soap's internet was not broken on the night of Wednesday, November the 30th. No, not at all. If it was, it must have been broken for a very narrow timeframe. It was working the night before at 8 pm: Show nested quote +On November 30 2011 08:42 Soap wrote:On November 28 2011 13:38 Soap wrote:
##Vote: Hier
##Vote: wherebugsbo On November 28 2011 14:25 Soap wrote:
##Unvote: Hier
##Vote: Ace I unvoted Hier, not wbg ##Unvote: Ace
##Vote: Risen And it was working on the December 1st at 3 am: What this indicates to me is that Soap's internet was working just fine. Why's that? Look at his post. This isn't a "I literally just logged in and wrote this" post. This is a "I was doing something, found a link that was broken, and decided to write about it over here" post. Soap, my friends, was active and online that night. If, in fact, Soap's internet was broken, it was broken for an extremely short period of time-- starting sometime within a couple hours before the deadline and stretching until just after. After being, well, characteristically helpful, Soap returns to the thread: Show nested quote +On December 02 2011 10:27 Soap wrote:
Hai!
I first voted sandroba for mayor because Palmar pushed him and that would be stupid if he was scum, then I got fed up with the shallow campaigns and voted sinani for the lulz. Then wbg took over the thread with mostly lists and OMGUS (spammer = scum amirite?) but noone else seemed to bother so I grew disinterested in posting, but I've been following closely.
Pleask ask if there's something else I could fill. Show nested quote +On December 02 2011 10:30 Soap wrote:
##Vote: wherebugsgo
##Vote: BloodyC0bbler Soap is either scum and trying to subvert our vote, or lying about having read the thread, or he'd be voting the way everyone else is. HE claims that he's been voting "for the lulz" and that he's lurking, and that those of us who contribute are scum and he is silent because he's not. I don't buy it. My body is not a sturdy cardboard cylinder. My head is not made out of hard, sweetened candy. I am not a sucker. Soap is scum.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 03 2011 04:40 Soap wrote:Show nested quote +On December 03 2011 03:58 Blazinghand wrote:One more thing. Soap's internet was not broken on the night of Wednesday, November the 30th. No, not at all. If it was, it must have been broken for a very narrow timeframe. It was working the night before at 8 pm: On November 30 2011 08:42 Soap wrote:On November 28 2011 13:38 Soap wrote:
##Vote: Hier
##Vote: wherebugsbo On November 28 2011 14:25 Soap wrote:
##Unvote: Hier
##Vote: Ace I unvoted Hier, not wbg ##Unvote: Ace
##Vote: Risen Pro analysis there bro.
Ah, good point-- european times. I was mistake, and withdraw that portion of my analysis.
However, you still were on at 3 am, weren't you? Did your internet come back online? Although there's now a larger window beforehand, the window afterwards is still less than 4 hours.
On the other hand, can you explain your current votes? Or your inactivity and lack of any attempts at meaningful analysis?
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
In fact, it would appear that you haven't successfully addressed the most damning of my criticisms, which is that you're voting for BC and WBG, and you were online almost immediately after the vote period but claimed you had no internet.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 03 2011 04:58 Soap wrote:Show nested quote +On December 03 2011 04:43 Blazinghand wrote:On December 03 2011 04:40 Soap wrote:On December 03 2011 03:58 Blazinghand wrote:One more thing. Soap's internet was not broken on the night of Wednesday, November the 30th. No, not at all. If it was, it must have been broken for a very narrow timeframe. It was working the night before at 8 pm: On November 30 2011 08:42 Soap wrote:On November 28 2011 13:38 Soap wrote:
##Vote: Hier
##Vote: wherebugsbo On November 28 2011 14:25 Soap wrote:
##Unvote: Hier
##Vote: Ace I unvoted Hier, not wbg ##Unvote: Ace
##Vote: Risen Pro analysis there bro. Ah, good point-- european times. I was mistake, and withdraw that portion of my analysis. However, you still were on at 3 am, weren't you? Did your internet come back online? Although there's now a larger window beforehand, the window afterwards is still less than 4 hours. On the other hand, can you explain your current votes? Or your inactivity and lack of any attempts at meaningful analysis? The deadline was Nov 30 12:00 KST, that's Dec 01 03:56 KST, almost 16 hours later. Today's vote is decided. Please don't expect me to hold to your standards of analysis.
Today's vote is decided... so you're gonna make worthless votes and give the mafia a chance at swinging the vote? Other people I've addressed on this issue have stepped in line. It's awfully scummy to make worthless votes, including trying to get rid of our double-lynches (what? are you serious) and refuse to even try to help.
I'm not holding you to my standards of analysis-- i'm holding you to make LITERALLY ANY USEFUL ANALYSIS AT ALL.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
Basically what I'm saying is, by not voting for K-pac and Ciry, and silently voting for WBC and BC (with no explanation at all) it is very clear that you're scum.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
Like, it's also worth noting that he's given no explanation at all for his votes. Hypothetically, if he really thinks WBC and BC are scum, and he's really town, he REALLY REALLY NEEDS TO START SPEAKING UP RIGHT NOW. because if WBC and BC are scum we need all the help we can get.
And yet he voted silently. If I thought BC and WBC were scum, I'd be aggressively fighting with them and trying to rally public support. I wouldn't silently vote for them. I'd be loud as hell.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
The other option is that he's an incredibly, indescribably, unbelievably, earth-shatteringly bad town.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
like, K-Pac and Ciry each have ~30 votes. If, somehow, this is what the voting structure looks like just before the vote closes, and 16 Mafiosos all change their votes from K-Pac/Ciry to, let's say, WBC/Blazinghand... well, we'd straight-up lose. Unlikely? Yes. Possible? Also yes.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
Basically: Vote K-Pac and Ciry, all you lurking punks, we don't have a lot of breathing room.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 03 2011 05:22 Soap wrote:Show nested quote +On December 03 2011 05:19 Blazinghand wrote:
like, K-Pac and Ciry each have ~30 votes. If, somehow, this is what the voting structure looks like just before the vote closes, and 16 Mafiosos all change their votes from K-Pac/Ciry to, let's say, WBC/Blazinghand... well, we'd straight-up lose. Unlikely? Yes. Possible? Also yes. There's only 14 mafia left. What the fuck are you doing?
On December 03 2011 04:43 Blazinghand wrote:
However, you still were on at 3 am, weren't you? Did your internet come back online? Although there's now a larger window beforehand, the window afterwards is still less than 4 hours.
On the other hand, can you explain your current votes? Or your inactivity and lack of any attempts at meaningful analysis?
Answer my questions first, scum.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
Soap, you better not dodge again. A Townie in your situation? He'd have some good explanations, AND he'd change his vote. What's your story, eh?
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
Wait, what am I talking about? there are no townies in your situation. If you're town, you tend to have, well, tried to contribute anything useful ever.
It's fine if you don't answer your questions; that itself is answer enough for us.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
No, but I think I know a guy from there. Galois?
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
Good point. Let's go back to the "WBC is actually scum" story. I'd like to hear more from you (SRJ) about this-- if WBC is scum, I have a lot of thinking to do.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
fu fuf uffufufufu
huge EBWOP: EVERY TIME I'VE SAID WBC I'VE MEANT WBG IN THE PAST COUPLE PAGES. G LOOKS LIKE C OK
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
Aww, look at that beautiful dodge. That's right, Soap doesn't have time to respond to allegations, he's two busy being a townie and voting.
That, or he's a mafia member, and doesn't need to even worry about this, and can't vote in this draw vote anyways.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 03 2011 05:53 Soap wrote:
Should I PM my draw vote to all the hosts or only one?
On December 03 2011 03:41 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
The current vote is 9-4 in favor of a draw. Please vote by PMing me only, I'm not going to count what people say in the thread. Also Please make your subject line either Accept or Decline, it makes it easier to sort so I have a smaller chance for error. 17 votes is the majority.
Edit: yes it's 17.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 03 2011 05:55 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On December 02 2011 21:40 GMarshal wrote:On December 02 2011 18:13 Hier wrote:On December 02 2011 16:46 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
The mafia has offered a draw. The town will vote on whether to accept their offer. Please PM your vote to the hosts, make the title either "Accept" or "Decline." If a majority accept then this game will be declared a draw. Do we just PM one of the hosts? Or all of them? All of them. Please
OP updated, I've been pretty sick (again -__-) over the last two days, which is why I was MIA. I crawled out of my bed to update the OP and now I'm going back to catch up on work. PM one of the other hosts if you need a quick answer.
This is old. This is incorrect. Newer:
On December 03 2011 03:41 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
The current vote is 9-4 in favor of a draw. Please vote by PMing me only, I'm not going to count what people say in the thread. Also Please make your subject line either Accept or Decline, it makes it easier to sort so I have a smaller chance for error. 17 votes is the majority.
Edit: yes it's 17.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
That's a fair point, KP. Would you mind elaborating?
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 03 2011 07:24 vaderseven wrote:Show nested quote +On December 03 2011 05:22 vaderseven wrote:
Extremely correct. Not voting the two confirmed scum is BAD.
LOOKS AT WBG. Show nested quote +On December 02 2011 18:12 wherebugsgo wrote:
##unvote vaderseven
##vote ciryandor O I C. You like ninja changed to a better vote so I will stop gawking at you for now.
On December 02 2011 18:13 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On December 02 2011 18:06 Blazinghand wrote:
WBG: I see you're voting for V7 and K-pac. Consider moving your V7 vote to Ciry so we can consolidate onto unassailable lynches. In fact, please do so. V7 won't be lynched today so let's focus on K-pac and Ciry handled broski I'm curious, who all voted to accept the draw? I haven't sent my PM in yet.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 03 2011 07:37 Serejai wrote:
I declined the draw because I'm confident my team will win.
Which team is that?
On December 03 2011 07:38 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
Current vote is 15-5 in favor of draw. Please vote if you haven't already.
._. this voter turnout, not so good
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 03 2011 09:20 Kavdragon wrote:Show nested quote +On December 03 2011 08:10 Lanaia wrote:
I've voted against because I really do want to try. +1
Why are you even posting in this thread?
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 03 2011 09:59 GreYMisT wrote:
I choose to abstain, my activity this game has been god aweful, so i don't wish to decide the outcome for the people who have invested more than I.
Abstaining is the same as voting "no" to the draw, since it's a majority if townies, not majority of townies who voted.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 03 2011 10:02 GreYMisT wrote:Show nested quote +On December 03 2011 10:00 Blazinghand wrote:On December 03 2011 09:59 GreYMisT wrote:
I choose to abstain, my activity this game has been god aweful, so i don't wish to decide the outcome for the people who have invested more than I. Abstaining is the same as voting "no" to the draw, since it's a majority if townies, not majority of townies who voted. Oh i was not aware that It was not the majority of the people who voted, although technically an abstain vote in this situation is the same as whatever the majority currently is, as it does nothing to combat it, but w/e. i am going to vote for the draw,
Well, ANY vote is a vote to be the same as the majority, unless you're the tie-breaking vote (in theory). An abstain vote just doesn't break ties. The thing in this case is that if the vote is tied, we won't draw-- which means that voting "no" and not voting are the same, since it's not "majority rules" it's "majority needed to draw"
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On December 03 2011 10:55 bumatlarge wrote:Show nested quote +On December 03 2011 10:35 wherebugsgo wrote:
Bum you scummy scum scum
I'm just twiddling my thumbs at this point. I'm 100% dead tonight.
Should I vote yes? herp derp what do you think, you know what fine dont vote yes see what happens. I feel bad for the newer players that just joined in, it's really awesome of you to sub in like that, but if you've looked at any of the numbers, you realize that this not just an uphill battle is god damn vertical.
Dude it's np we just need to have perfect lynches and perfect medics
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
Hey man I played great and had fun :D during my first game, I did not get to lynch anyone. Or have a vote counted. Or use any powers, mafia-ize/kill someone. Or get killed.
not bad eh?
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
It was only a matter of time before I deduced everything.
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
