|
|
|
|
|
##Vote: TEAM VIKING
Post regarding them to come
|
honestly gm you used meta as your main reason for a scumread on me and i provided you with 2 games that directly countered that meta read you had on me.
|
United States22154 Posts
On November 05 2011 01:48 redFF wrote:
nice try though
Oh, you mean posts like
On July 25 2011 10:44 redFF wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2011 10:42 Curu wrote:
Anyways I'm going out for a bit. I don't understand why the initial reaction to my plan was UR SCUM so if anyone cares to point out why knowing everyone's roles and being able to see which powers were used in an Anti Town manner and who has those powers is super harmful to Town I'd like to enlightened.
Don't give that blue sniping BS, every Townie is a blue this game and Mafia already know what several of the powers are. Pure simple DT-type roles are also very unlikely considering deconduo encouraged interesting and whacky ones. Because scum can see which roles threaten them and block/shoot accordingly...Plus mafia could call out people for fake-claiming and possibly fake claim themselves. Analysis wins games not roles!
On July 25 2011 11:59 redFF wrote:
Give it to sandroba, from his reaction to having the stick and not sneakily giving it to his mafia team member and not telling the thread, I have him as town or mafia but not with jackal or ON. Give it back to sandroba, the less kp the better. On July 25 2011 14:43 redFF wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2011 14:36 youngminii wrote:
It's not the randomisation thing, it's the "VOLDEMORT HAS DISGUISED HIMSELF AS TOWN"
I wrote that in caps because half the people posting seem to have completely missed that. It could just be like You are harry potter and you know he who must not be named is evil and a douche and scary and a snake man but somehow he has become part of town, MUST BE A DISGUISE!!! So i wouldn't necessarily say that Jackal lied while doing that. That said, it's the best evidence we have so far and I would be fine with a Jackal lynch. I think the stuff that someone brought up about Drazerk was the most damning evidence though. Ima wait for Jackal to post tommorow before i cast my vote.
On July 26 2011 03:56 redFF wrote:Show nested quote +On July 26 2011 00:39 DropBear wrote:
Ok I may as well cop the penalty. Mafia now knows who shot youngminii and all his abilities so I have to come out and save him now. I made the Tim Roth role.
Supersoft is Tim Roth. He only gets one kill. His kill causes his alignment and role abilities to be PMd to everyone of the opposite alignment to him. I didn't get that PM so supersoft is now 100% confirmed to be town.
His other ability is an alignment check, which activates if you get into a 3 each quote convo with him i.e. you post, he quotes, you quote the quote until there is 3 each.
I would suggest forcing people to quote him. Not everyone at once though as it would shit up the thread something shocking. What was your penalty? Good job Supersoft, I didn't get a pm telling me tackster's alignment, was that a mistake?I'm still weary of Jackal. Behaviourally i'm not noticing anything that scummy though. I'm tired of Kurumi getting away from doing jack-shit every game and doing no analysis and just trolling so i'm voting him until something better comes up. kita-iirc he played this way early on in the first ptp and was town and a lot of people(mainly mafia) jumped on him for it to get an easy lynch, I suggest someone starts quoting supersoft though. i will do it if necesssary.
On July 26 2011 10:24 redFF wrote:
Supersoft killed a mafia day 1. This is the same terrible reasoning that got palmar lynched. Let's think for a second.
Tackster is copycat and gets supersoft's role. Tackster shoots YM, if they were both scum supersoft could have just claimed the shot right? Why would Supersoft kill his scumbuddy? SS is not scum as far as im concerned.
He's asked bc to quote him so he can alignment check and BC has refused, arguing SS is untrustworthy, when SS killed a mafia day 1. SS telling us BC is scum would get BC lynched but if BC is town we would just kill SS, so that wouldn't happen. The only reason I can think BC is refusing the alignment check is because he is afraid of what he will come up as...
##Vote BC
Huh, some actually hepful posts from that game, not a bunch of one line garbage that helps no one but the mafia.
In your words, lol, nice try.
|
except im posting content in this game. and i'm partnered with someone else.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Ok, its unfortunate that it has come to this, but we are the Parity Cop. Congrats :/
We are claiming for the following reasons:
The best case scenario at this point is a no-lynch with the afk prp/forumite vote and a tunneling GM. Even if we came up with a target like chaoser, he is obviously not going to vote for himself, nor is his scum buddy, so if we want to accomplish anything today, the claim is necessary. I'd rather give up our identity than throw away a lynch. We are claiming early enough in the day that there is still time to push a lynch. As for who that should be, we are still discussing that. We don't want Team Viking, which is what team chaoser seems to be pushing.
As I mentioned before, without protection and a series of mislynches, the parity cop only has about a 10% sucess rate. If there is a 66% there is a protection role in the setup, which helps our chances of staying alive.
On November 03 2011 07:30 kitaman27 wrote:
I think the most important thing to probably consider
As I mentioned in the ban thread earlier, its possible for blues to breadcrumb their roles with the first post, which is what I did. It's not absolute proof of the claim, but know that the claim was prepared from the start. What we can 100% confirm is that nobody else is the parity cop.
|
United States22154 Posts
On November 05 2011 01:53 redFF wrote:
except im posting content in this game. and i'm partnered with someone else.
...
content like? The first actual contribution you make is after my accusation. Anyone can verify this with the filter button...
Or are you refering to this OMGUS
On November 04 2011 11:23 redFF wrote:Show nested quote +On November 04 2011 11:08 wherebugsgo wrote:On November 04 2011 10:52 kitaman27 wrote:On November 04 2011 10:21 deconduo wrote:
Prime scum team, probably worthy of a vote. I want to here what sandroba has to say first though, still haven't gotten in contact with him yet. Won't be able to until tomorrow either as I'm off to bed now. Oh prime scum team? Funny, you haven't pointed out anything that was actually scummy. At this point, I believe the scum team is contained in this set of players. Ideally I'd like to be able to narrow it down as more people start to post, but RoL, Kurumi, Crofty, iGrok, and Katzeleute all need to give us more to work with. 1. sandroba & Sevryn Deconduo - TEAM SS 3. Radfield & wherebugsgo - TEAM CHEZINU 4. Kurumi & RebirthOfLeGenD - TEAM NIPPLE 5. Crofty & Gmarshal - TEAM LIQUID 7. chaoser & hyshes - TEAM EDWARD 8. iGrok & Katzeleute - TEAM SWITZERLAND lol @ this, kita names 2/3 of the player base as being possible scum and then doesn't explain why he conveniently excludes Forumite+prpl and Greymist+super. I mean, really, what is your point? Why are prpl+forumite not possible scum? Or Grey+super? For all we know, you could be scum. This "information" you provide is utterly useless. hes just giving his reads. its funny that this is the first time you've attacked us and its just after decon fos'd us. scum. ##unvote
##Vote wherebugsgo
or perhaps to
On November 04 2011 04:02 redFF wrote:
an idiotic sandroba plan! ofcourse!
we are lynching today lol
maybe
On November 04 2011 03:10 redFF wrote:
jesus christ lol we're lynching today.
i fear for you when RoL sees that post kurumi.
or
On November 03 2011 09:10 redFF wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2011 09:04 hyshes wrote:On November 03 2011 08:48 Forumite wrote:On November 03 2011 08:42 hyshes wrote:On November 03 2011 08:31 Forumite wrote:On November 03 2011 08:00 GreYMisT wrote:
One thing that will be interesting this game will be analyzing the behavior of teams. do we judge the 2 players as a unit, looking for scum behavior in both? Or is one player acting scummy enough to vote. Tricky... Two posters means twice the risk of mistakes, I would have liked to say that means it´s twice as easy to find scum, but Town make stupid scumslips too. I think we´ll have to take it on a case-by-case basis. Actually the best way of playing this kind of mafia is splitting up your team. If only one of you knows your role, then only one can make mistakes. The only thing you need to do together is analysis of the other teams. To prevent any possible mistakes, must the one who knows the role only paraphrase what his teammate says. Ofcourse by the second night the one who knows should tell the one who don't (a few nights later depending on the size of the game). There is an obvious easy mistake to make here: the role should always be hidden, even it's town. That doesn´t make sense. This tactic only help scum, Town don´t risk looking scummy from just knowing their role, so only scum would do this. Why are you thinking so much about a pro-scum tactic? This actually does not hinder town in any way. Since only the not-knowing person is actually posting and the other one paraphrasing, town does not lose a townie. You still have to do analysis with your teammate about all the other teams (without talking about own team), so you got all the pieces. If townie: your team actually plays as regular townie, so no harm If blue: your team plays as regular townie, so no extra eyes on you If scum: you play as town the first 2 days, you lose a lot of suspicion because of this. and then you accidentally lead the bandwagon on your godfather....
all these *wonderful* contributions, which say NOTHING about anyone around you.
Stop clutching at straws.
|
On November 05 2011 01:08 Forumite wrote:
I don´t have much time to post. I just want to say that I support GM's case and throwing mine and prplhz's vote to support it. We won´t be here for the lynch, but I think it´s the best place to put that vote right now, so that´s what we have to go by. If something huge comes up before the deadline then I expect there to be enough people online that one vote won´t much matter.
##Unvote
##Vote Team Red21
Also: FoS Nipple, post moar!
the stupidity of this post cannot be ignored.
also what kita said.
|
United States22154 Posts
On November 05 2011 01:54 kitaman27 wrote:Ok, its unfortunate that it has come to this, but we are the Parity Cop. Congrats :/ We are claiming for the following reasons:The best case scenario at this point is a no-lynch with the afk prp/forumite vote and a tunneling GM. Even if we came up with a target like chaoser, he is obviously not going to vote for himself, nor is his scum buddy, so if we want to accomplish anything today, the claim is necessary. I'd rather give up our identity than throw away a lynch. We are claiming early enough in the day that there is still time to push a lynch. As for who that should be, we are still discussing that. We don't want Team Viking, which is what team chaoser seems to be pushing. As I mentioned before, without protection and a series of mislynches, the parity cop only has about a 10% sucess rate. If there is a 66% there is a protection role in the setup, which helps our chances of staying alive. Show nested quote +On November 03 2011 07:30 kitaman27 wrote:
I think the most important thing to probably consider
As I mentioned in the ban thread earlier, its possible for blues to breadcrumb their roles with the first post, which is what I did. It's not absolute proof of the claim, but know that the claim was prepared from the start. What we can 100% confirm is that nobody else is the parity cop.
Facepalm...
Time to reconsider everything.
|
On November 05 2011 01:56 redFF wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2011 01:08 Forumite wrote:
I don´t have much time to post. I just want to say that I support GM's case and throwing mine and prplhz's vote to support it. We won´t be here for the lynch, but I think it´s the best place to put that vote right now, so that´s what we have to go by. If something huge comes up before the deadline then I expect there to be enough people online that one vote won´t much matter.
##Unvote
##Vote Team Red21
Also: FoS Nipple, post moar! the stupidity of this post cannot be ignored. also what kita said.
Agreed, as well as this one:
I like GMarshal's post. I'm leaving in an hour or so, maybe kitaman27 or redFF can conjure up something before that.
and this one
Sure, you can pick this lynch, I´ll pick the next one
|
On November 05 2011 01:56 GMarshal wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2011 01:53 redFF wrote:
except im posting content in this game. and i'm partnered with someone else. ... content like? The first actual contribution you make is after my accusation. Anyone can verify this with the filter button... Or are you refering to this OMGUS Show nested quote +On November 04 2011 11:23 redFF wrote:On November 04 2011 11:08 wherebugsgo wrote:On November 04 2011 10:52 kitaman27 wrote:On November 04 2011 10:21 deconduo wrote:
Prime scum team, probably worthy of a vote. I want to here what sandroba has to say first though, still haven't gotten in contact with him yet. Won't be able to until tomorrow either as I'm off to bed now. Oh prime scum team? Funny, you haven't pointed out anything that was actually scummy. At this point, I believe the scum team is contained in this set of players. Ideally I'd like to be able to narrow it down as more people start to post, but RoL, Kurumi, Crofty, iGrok, and Katzeleute all need to give us more to work with. 1. sandroba & Sevryn Deconduo - TEAM SS 3. Radfield & wherebugsgo - TEAM CHEZINU 4. Kurumi & RebirthOfLeGenD - TEAM NIPPLE 5. Crofty & Gmarshal - TEAM LIQUID 7. chaoser & hyshes - TEAM EDWARD 8. iGrok & Katzeleute - TEAM SWITZERLAND lol @ this, kita names 2/3 of the player base as being possible scum and then doesn't explain why he conveniently excludes Forumite+prpl and Greymist+super. I mean, really, what is your point? Why are prpl+forumite not possible scum? Or Grey+super? For all we know, you could be scum. This "information" you provide is utterly useless. hes just giving his reads. its funny that this is the first time you've attacked us and its just after decon fos'd us. scum. ##unvote
##Vote wherebugsgo or perhaps to Show nested quote +On November 04 2011 04:02 redFF wrote:
an idiotic sandroba plan! ofcourse!
we are lynching today lol maybe Show nested quote +On November 04 2011 03:10 redFF wrote:
jesus christ lol we're lynching today.
i fear for you when RoL sees that post kurumi. or Show nested quote +On November 03 2011 09:10 redFF wrote:On November 03 2011 09:04 hyshes wrote:On November 03 2011 08:48 Forumite wrote:On November 03 2011 08:42 hyshes wrote:On November 03 2011 08:31 Forumite wrote:On November 03 2011 08:00 GreYMisT wrote:
One thing that will be interesting this game will be analyzing the behavior of teams. do we judge the 2 players as a unit, looking for scum behavior in both? Or is one player acting scummy enough to vote. Tricky... Two posters means twice the risk of mistakes, I would have liked to say that means it´s twice as easy to find scum, but Town make stupid scumslips too. I think we´ll have to take it on a case-by-case basis. Actually the best way of playing this kind of mafia is splitting up your team. If only one of you knows your role, then only one can make mistakes. The only thing you need to do together is analysis of the other teams. To prevent any possible mistakes, must the one who knows the role only paraphrase what his teammate says. Ofcourse by the second night the one who knows should tell the one who don't (a few nights later depending on the size of the game). There is an obvious easy mistake to make here: the role should always be hidden, even it's town. That doesn´t make sense. This tactic only help scum, Town don´t risk looking scummy from just knowing their role, so only scum would do this. Why are you thinking so much about a pro-scum tactic? This actually does not hinder town in any way. Since only the not-knowing person is actually posting and the other one paraphrasing, town does not lose a townie. You still have to do analysis with your teammate about all the other teams (without talking about own team), so you got all the pieces. If townie: your team actually plays as regular townie, so no harm If blue: your team plays as regular townie, so no extra eyes on you If scum: you play as town the first 2 days, you lose a lot of suspicion because of this. and then you accidentally lead the bandwagon on your godfather.... all these *wonderful* contributions, which say NOTHING about anyone around you. Stop clutching at straws.
so the first one is a vote and an fos, the second and third ones are commenting on a plan brought forth, the fourth one points out a flaw in a plan put forward. nice try though.
|
United States22154 Posts
On November 05 2011 01:59 redFF wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2011 01:56 GMarshal wrote:On November 05 2011 01:53 redFF wrote:
except im posting content in this game. and i'm partnered with someone else. ... content like? The first actual contribution you make is after my accusation. Anyone can verify this with the filter button... Or are you refering to this OMGUS On November 04 2011 11:23 redFF wrote:On November 04 2011 11:08 wherebugsgo wrote:On November 04 2011 10:52 kitaman27 wrote:On November 04 2011 10:21 deconduo wrote:
Prime scum team, probably worthy of a vote. I want to here what sandroba has to say first though, still haven't gotten in contact with him yet. Won't be able to until tomorrow either as I'm off to bed now. Oh prime scum team? Funny, you haven't pointed out anything that was actually scummy. At this point, I believe the scum team is contained in this set of players. Ideally I'd like to be able to narrow it down as more people start to post, but RoL, Kurumi, Crofty, iGrok, and Katzeleute all need to give us more to work with. 1. sandroba & Sevryn Deconduo - TEAM SS 3. Radfield & wherebugsgo - TEAM CHEZINU 4. Kurumi & RebirthOfLeGenD - TEAM NIPPLE 5. Crofty & Gmarshal - TEAM LIQUID 7. chaoser & hyshes - TEAM EDWARD 8. iGrok & Katzeleute - TEAM SWITZERLAND lol @ this, kita names 2/3 of the player base as being possible scum and then doesn't explain why he conveniently excludes Forumite+prpl and Greymist+super. I mean, really, what is your point? Why are prpl+forumite not possible scum? Or Grey+super? For all we know, you could be scum. This "information" you provide is utterly useless. hes just giving his reads. its funny that this is the first time you've attacked us and its just after decon fos'd us. scum. ##unvote
##Vote wherebugsgo or perhaps to On November 04 2011 04:02 redFF wrote:
an idiotic sandroba plan! ofcourse!
we are lynching today lol maybe On November 04 2011 03:10 redFF wrote:
jesus christ lol we're lynching today.
i fear for you when RoL sees that post kurumi. or On November 03 2011 09:10 redFF wrote:On November 03 2011 09:04 hyshes wrote:On November 03 2011 08:48 Forumite wrote:On November 03 2011 08:42 hyshes wrote:On November 03 2011 08:31 Forumite wrote:On November 03 2011 08:00 GreYMisT wrote:
One thing that will be interesting this game will be analyzing the behavior of teams. do we judge the 2 players as a unit, looking for scum behavior in both? Or is one player acting scummy enough to vote. Tricky... Two posters means twice the risk of mistakes, I would have liked to say that means it´s twice as easy to find scum, but Town make stupid scumslips too. I think we´ll have to take it on a case-by-case basis. Actually the best way of playing this kind of mafia is splitting up your team. If only one of you knows your role, then only one can make mistakes. The only thing you need to do together is analysis of the other teams. To prevent any possible mistakes, must the one who knows the role only paraphrase what his teammate says. Ofcourse by the second night the one who knows should tell the one who don't (a few nights later depending on the size of the game). There is an obvious easy mistake to make here: the role should always be hidden, even it's town. That doesn´t make sense. This tactic only help scum, Town don´t risk looking scummy from just knowing their role, so only scum would do this. Why are you thinking so much about a pro-scum tactic? This actually does not hinder town in any way. Since only the not-knowing person is actually posting and the other one paraphrasing, town does not lose a townie. You still have to do analysis with your teammate about all the other teams (without talking about own team), so you got all the pieces. If townie: your team actually plays as regular townie, so no harm If blue: your team plays as regular townie, so no extra eyes on you If scum: you play as town the first 2 days, you lose a lot of suspicion because of this. and then you accidentally lead the bandwagon on your godfather.... all these *wonderful* contributions, which say NOTHING about anyone around you. Stop clutching at straws. so the first one is a vote and an fos, the second and third ones are commenting on a plan brought forth, the fourth one points out a flaw in a plan put forward. nice try though.
You just claimed, so I'm done accusing you till I reevaluate, however I could easily go through a point how each and every one of your posts says pretty much nothing , so don't push it.
Chaoser, you said you had a case on prplhz, is that forthcoming?
|
What we can 100% confirm is that nobody else is the parity cop.
kitaman, why would that be?
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On November 05 2011 02:01 hyshes wrote:kitaman, why would that be?
Because there is only one parity cop?
|
On November 05 2011 02:01 GMarshal wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2011 01:59 redFF wrote:On November 05 2011 01:56 GMarshal wrote:On November 05 2011 01:53 redFF wrote:
except im posting content in this game. and i'm partnered with someone else. ... content like? The first actual contribution you make is after my accusation. Anyone can verify this with the filter button... Or are you refering to this OMGUS On November 04 2011 11:23 redFF wrote:On November 04 2011 11:08 wherebugsgo wrote:On November 04 2011 10:52 kitaman27 wrote:On November 04 2011 10:21 deconduo wrote:
Prime scum team, probably worthy of a vote. I want to here what sandroba has to say first though, still haven't gotten in contact with him yet. Won't be able to until tomorrow either as I'm off to bed now. Oh prime scum team? Funny, you haven't pointed out anything that was actually scummy. At this point, I believe the scum team is contained in this set of players. Ideally I'd like to be able to narrow it down as more people start to post, but RoL, Kurumi, Crofty, iGrok, and Katzeleute all need to give us more to work with. 1. sandroba & Sevryn Deconduo - TEAM SS 3. Radfield & wherebugsgo - TEAM CHEZINU 4. Kurumi & RebirthOfLeGenD - TEAM NIPPLE 5. Crofty & Gmarshal - TEAM LIQUID 7. chaoser & hyshes - TEAM EDWARD 8. iGrok & Katzeleute - TEAM SWITZERLAND lol @ this, kita names 2/3 of the player base as being possible scum and then doesn't explain why he conveniently excludes Forumite+prpl and Greymist+super. I mean, really, what is your point? Why are prpl+forumite not possible scum? Or Grey+super? For all we know, you could be scum. This "information" you provide is utterly useless. hes just giving his reads. its funny that this is the first time you've attacked us and its just after decon fos'd us. scum. ##unvote
##Vote wherebugsgo or perhaps to On November 04 2011 04:02 redFF wrote:
an idiotic sandroba plan! ofcourse!
we are lynching today lol maybe On November 04 2011 03:10 redFF wrote:
jesus christ lol we're lynching today.
i fear for you when RoL sees that post kurumi. or On November 03 2011 09:10 redFF wrote:On November 03 2011 09:04 hyshes wrote:On November 03 2011 08:48 Forumite wrote:On November 03 2011 08:42 hyshes wrote:On November 03 2011 08:31 Forumite wrote:On November 03 2011 08:00 GreYMisT wrote:
One thing that will be interesting this game will be analyzing the behavior of teams. do we judge the 2 players as a unit, looking for scum behavior in both? Or is one player acting scummy enough to vote. Tricky... Two posters means twice the risk of mistakes, I would have liked to say that means it´s twice as easy to find scum, but Town make stupid scumslips too. I think we´ll have to take it on a case-by-case basis. Actually the best way of playing this kind of mafia is splitting up your team. If only one of you knows your role, then only one can make mistakes. The only thing you need to do together is analysis of the other teams. To prevent any possible mistakes, must the one who knows the role only paraphrase what his teammate says. Ofcourse by the second night the one who knows should tell the one who don't (a few nights later depending on the size of the game). There is an obvious easy mistake to make here: the role should always be hidden, even it's town. That doesn´t make sense. This tactic only help scum, Town don´t risk looking scummy from just knowing their role, so only scum would do this. Why are you thinking so much about a pro-scum tactic? This actually does not hinder town in any way. Since only the not-knowing person is actually posting and the other one paraphrasing, town does not lose a townie. You still have to do analysis with your teammate about all the other teams (without talking about own team), so you got all the pieces. If townie: your team actually plays as regular townie, so no harm If blue: your team plays as regular townie, so no extra eyes on you If scum: you play as town the first 2 days, you lose a lot of suspicion because of this. and then you accidentally lead the bandwagon on your godfather.... all these *wonderful* contributions, which say NOTHING about anyone around you. Stop clutching at straws. so the first one is a vote and an fos, the second and third ones are commenting on a plan brought forth, the fourth one points out a flaw in a plan put forward. nice try though. You just claimed, so I'm done accusing you till I reevaluate, however I could easily go through a point how each and every one of your posts says pretty much nothing , so don't push it. Chaoser, you said you had a case on prplhz, is that forthcoming?
actually im pushing it
|
everyone on us should be unvoting
|
On November 05 2011 02:02 redFF wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2011 02:01 GMarshal wrote:On November 05 2011 01:59 redFF wrote:On November 05 2011 01:56 GMarshal wrote:On November 05 2011 01:53 redFF wrote:
except im posting content in this game. and i'm partnered with someone else. ... content like? The first actual contribution you make is after my accusation. Anyone can verify this with the filter button... Or are you refering to this OMGUS On November 04 2011 11:23 redFF wrote:On November 04 2011 11:08 wherebugsgo wrote:On November 04 2011 10:52 kitaman27 wrote:On November 04 2011 10:21 deconduo wrote:
Prime scum team, probably worthy of a vote. I want to here what sandroba has to say first though, still haven't gotten in contact with him yet. Won't be able to until tomorrow either as I'm off to bed now. Oh prime scum team? Funny, you haven't pointed out anything that was actually scummy. At this point, I believe the scum team is contained in this set of players. Ideally I'd like to be able to narrow it down as more people start to post, but RoL, Kurumi, Crofty, iGrok, and Katzeleute all need to give us more to work with. 1. sandroba & Sevryn Deconduo - TEAM SS 3. Radfield & wherebugsgo - TEAM CHEZINU 4. Kurumi & RebirthOfLeGenD - TEAM NIPPLE 5. Crofty & Gmarshal - TEAM LIQUID 7. chaoser & hyshes - TEAM EDWARD 8. iGrok & Katzeleute - TEAM SWITZERLAND lol @ this, kita names 2/3 of the player base as being possible scum and then doesn't explain why he conveniently excludes Forumite+prpl and Greymist+super. I mean, really, what is your point? Why are prpl+forumite not possible scum? Or Grey+super? For all we know, you could be scum. This "information" you provide is utterly useless. hes just giving his reads. its funny that this is the first time you've attacked us and its just after decon fos'd us. scum. ##unvote
##Vote wherebugsgo or perhaps to On November 04 2011 04:02 redFF wrote:
an idiotic sandroba plan! ofcourse!
we are lynching today lol maybe On November 04 2011 03:10 redFF wrote:
jesus christ lol we're lynching today.
i fear for you when RoL sees that post kurumi. or On November 03 2011 09:10 redFF wrote:On November 03 2011 09:04 hyshes wrote:On November 03 2011 08:48 Forumite wrote:On November 03 2011 08:42 hyshes wrote:On November 03 2011 08:31 Forumite wrote:On November 03 2011 08:00 GreYMisT wrote:
One thing that will be interesting this game will be analyzing the behavior of teams. do we judge the 2 players as a unit, looking for scum behavior in both? Or is one player acting scummy enough to vote. Tricky... Two posters means twice the risk of mistakes, I would have liked to say that means it´s twice as easy to find scum, but Town make stupid scumslips too. I think we´ll have to take it on a case-by-case basis. Actually the best way of playing this kind of mafia is splitting up your team. If only one of you knows your role, then only one can make mistakes. The only thing you need to do together is analysis of the other teams. To prevent any possible mistakes, must the one who knows the role only paraphrase what his teammate says. Ofcourse by the second night the one who knows should tell the one who don't (a few nights later depending on the size of the game). There is an obvious easy mistake to make here: the role should always be hidden, even it's town. That doesn´t make sense. This tactic only help scum, Town don´t risk looking scummy from just knowing their role, so only scum would do this. Why are you thinking so much about a pro-scum tactic? This actually does not hinder town in any way. Since only the not-knowing person is actually posting and the other one paraphrasing, town does not lose a townie. You still have to do analysis with your teammate about all the other teams (without talking about own team), so you got all the pieces. If townie: your team actually plays as regular townie, so no harm If blue: your team plays as regular townie, so no extra eyes on you If scum: you play as town the first 2 days, you lose a lot of suspicion because of this. and then you accidentally lead the bandwagon on your godfather.... all these *wonderful* contributions, which say NOTHING about anyone around you. Stop clutching at straws. so the first one is a vote and an fos, the second and third ones are commenting on a plan brought forth, the fourth one points out a flaw in a plan put forward. nice try though. You just claimed, so I'm done accusing you till I reevaluate, however I could easily go through a point how each and every one of your posts says pretty much nothing , so don't push it. Chaoser, you said you had a case on prplhz, is that forthcoming? actually im pushing it
As soon as hyshes gathers it up lol
|
hahaha. what a start. okay ppl that deserve a lookover on my list are: viking, SS and GM.
|
On November 01 2011 17:50 Palmar wrote:Setup This is an open mini setup with a twist. There will be 18 players but only 9 roles in the game, each role will be played by two players, and they will for all intents an purposes be considered a single entity throughout the game, they will vote together (the last vote always counts) and they will be voted for together, and if they have any actions they will do them together. As for the roles, the setup will be randomly chosen among the following. - 1 Mafia Goon, 1 Mafia Role Cop, 5 Vanilla Townies, Parity Cop, Doctor.
- 1 Mafia Goon, 1 Mafia Role Cop, 5 Vanilla Townies, Parity Cop, Jailkeeper.
- 1 Mafia Goon, 1 Mafia Role Cop, 5 Vanilla Townies, Doctor, Jailkeeper.
- 1 Mafia Goon, 1 Mafia Role Cop, 6 Vanilla Townies, Parity Cop.
- 1 Mafia Goon, 1 Mafia Role Cop, 6 Vanilla Townies, Jailkeeper.
- 1 Mafia Goon, 1 Mafia Role Cop, 6 Vanilla Townies, Doctor.
okay wait. this claim doesnt confirm them...
they're only confirmed if there is no other blue in here. however another blue is not enough to determine if they're lying.
this claim is basically worthless right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
