EPTTeam Melee Mini Mafia - Couples Therapy - Page 22
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On November 05 2011 01:04 GMarshal wrote: Not really well not from not having contributed at all. What you *can* do is offer an alternate lynch, with good supporting arguments! That would go a long way towards remedying the whole "hasn't done anything all game long" argument. GOOD JOB I AM THEN | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
##Unvote ##Vote Team Red21 Also: FoS Nipple, post moar! | ||
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
On November 05 2011 01:04 redFF wrote: gm you ignored my examples aswell as what i said about team ss Because it only came up now, when I have you on the chopping block. Too little too late. Why didn't you share these earlier? The fact that I had to call you scum in a massive post and get two votes on you before you gave anything says you don't really care about the town, only about your own neck. As far a PYP:I goes, your shared smurf has some decent posts, so I can also truthfully say you contributed there. What you can't do is say "obviously all the bad posts were mine" because that is unverifiable, its impossible to know which posts were yours and which ON's. At worst it has to be ignored, at best it supports my arguments. | ||
|
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
On November 05 2011 01:05 redFF wrote: in fact after filtering you i notice you haven't said a thing about team SS, the team leading in votes, all game. SCUMPARTNERS MUCH? I said "I don't think sandroba is scum" several times. Learn to read. Lovely reaction to being accused though. He accuses me "HE MUST BE SCUM". | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On November 05 2011 01:09 GMarshal wrote: Because it only came up now, when I have you on the chopping block. Too little too late. Why didn't you share these earlier? The fact that I had to call you scum in a massive post and get two votes on you before you gave anything says you don't really care about the town, only about your own neck. As far a PYP:I goes, your shared smurf has some decent posts, so I can also truthfully say you contributed there. What you can't do is say "obviously all the bad posts were mine" because that is unverifiable, its impossible to know which posts were yours and which ON's. At worst it has to be ignored, at best it supports my arguments. holy crap you're now lying scum. and you ignored ptp | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On November 05 2011 01:08 Forumite wrote: I don´t have much time to post. I just want to say that I support GM's case and throwing mine and prplhz's vote to support it. We won´t be here for the lynch, but I think it´s the best place to put that vote right now, so that´s what we have to go by. If something huge comes up before the deadline then I expect there to be enough people online that one vote won´t much matter. ##Unvote ##Vote Team Red21 Also: FoS Nipple, post moar! you're fucking retarded. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
also i love how as soon as gm posts a long wall of text the newbies come out in full force and vote us without even reading it lol. | ||
|
deconduo
Ireland4122 Posts
On November 05 2011 00:51 redFF wrote: there are no clues in this game, i haven't talked about lurking once. i haven't defended anyone and i have had scumreads on you and wbg this game, and also team SS (which ill get to) i counter you with PYP interesting, i am in a hydra with ON I think its fairly obvious who is posting what. i was town. also PTP2 both games im town, both games i post spammy one liners. Contrary to your belief GM, you don't need to post page long walls of bullshit to be town. NOW HERE'S SOMETHING INTERESTING GM posts long fos, decon sheeps it with no original thought, decon attempts to start shitty bandwagon on a townie to save his scummy ass from being lynched. ##Unvote ##Vote Team SS Hint, I already said I was going to vote you last night once I got sandro's approval. Read the thread. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On November 05 2011 00:49 GMarshal wrote: Wow kita, you completely fail to address the majority of my points, while focusing on the nitpicking, great job! Nope, only the points that seemed relavent. If there is anything you want me to respond to, go ahead. Watch your tone mister.  On November 05 2011 00:49 GMarshal wrote: Yet you didn't offer another outlet for discussion, which is what I take issue with. Town kita would have given something else to work with, if just an accusation or a push against a player, you just said "lol, no" and left it at that, "lol, no, but...." is pro-town, "lol no." is anti-town. Don't muddle the issue. At that point I'm at work skimming the thread for 60 seconds between loading screens. My opening post already provided discussion topics: -Majority lynch, don't hammer. -No lynch isn't helpful -Offensive jailkeeper -Random vote You mimic'd my points with your L-2 discussion and no-lynch discussion. You accuse me as taking a "safe" stand only after 2 others have already commented on the issue, yet I'm the one who brought it up in the first place. On November 05 2011 00:49 GMarshal wrote: No, you made a veiled accusation calling me scum and didn't push on it. You weren't saying "gm, be nice" or anything like that, you were implying that I was scum. Without going out and saying it. That's also not town behavior, if you thought my meta indicated I wouldn't do that as town, you should have elaborated, if you wanted me to back off, you should have said it. Instead you go with a veiled accusation. That's called seeding suspicion. My vote was on you, I was questioning your posts, I was questioning why you are attacking peoples ideas as if you were Ace and I'm asking others their opinion about you. What makes you so sure that I'm not thinking you're scum? On November 05 2011 00:49 GMarshal wrote: As I said, scum love setup discussion. Its interesting that this is the only place you show a strong opinion Sounds familiar. With the exception of the recent case against myself, your main focus has been discussing the no-lynch as well. You call me out for yelling at lurkers, yet you yourself say: "As usual there is no excuse for lurking, don't do it and you won't have me lobbing for your lynch. Seriously, 2 players per team should mean a more than decent level of activity, you aren't going to get away with 2~3 posts per cycle unless they are an outstanding, wall of text, analytical set of three posts." On November 05 2011 00:49 GMarshal wrote: You know better than this. You never, ever post "I think this guy is town" or even imply it, as that makes them targets, instead you pick your top three scum candidates and push them. even if behind the scenes you are town hunting. You know this, you've played enough games. Huh? Do I really have to go back through all your games and point out all the times you've pointed someone out as town? You state your opinion as if its a fact. If I want to steer the lynch away from certain players, I'm going to say I think they are town. On November 05 2011 00:49 GMarshal wrote: You are scum. Sure as day. Quite confident based on less than 48 hours of information. Like I said, I'll reread the thread to look for a case for an alternate candidate. I'm openly sharing my opinions. Apparently that's scummy? | ||
|
deconduo
Ireland4122 Posts
On November 05 2011 00:51 redFF wrote: there are no clues in this game, i haven't talked about lurking once. i haven't defended anyone and i have had scumreads on you and wbg this game, and also team SS (which ill get to) i counter you with PYP interesting, i am in a hydra with ON I think its fairly obvious who is posting what. i was town. also PTP2 both games im town, both games i post spammy one liners. Contrary to your belief GM, you don't need to post page long walls of bullshit to be town. NOW HERE'S SOMETHING INTERESTING GM posts long fos, decon sheeps it with no original thought, decon attempts to start shitty bandwagon on a townie to save his scummy ass from being lynched. ##Unvote ##Vote Team SS EBWOP: In fact you're the one who's trying to save your scummy ass by trying to get the shitty bandwagon back onto me. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On November 05 2011 01:10 GMarshal wrote: I said "I don't think sandroba is scum" several times. Learn to read. Hey look, are you calling sandroba town? Didn't you just attack me saying that a town would never share a town read? And that I "should know better"? On November 05 2011 01:14 redFF wrote: you're fucking retarded. By which he means, you're voting for vote for awful reasons. I haven't discussed anything with red yet, but ignore the SS vote for now. If sandroba gave the "ok" on the case, I'd like to hear his opinion as well. | ||
|
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
I want to hear what other people think of the case, especially supersoft, who I have my eye on and radfeild who usually shows solid judgement. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
It´s not me who you need to talk to, it´s the owners of the other 4 votes needed to lynch you. I´ve read the case, read the first replies and dropped the vote, there´s nothing more to it, because I can´t change the vote when i´m offline, even if I wanted to. If you have something to say, say it to those online, they are the ones you need to convince of your innocence. You have a few hours left to do so, good luck. | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On November 05 2011 01:31 kitaman27 wrote: You're suspicious of prp's team, supersoft and myself? The three people I'm willing to trust. Either your reads are really off or you're intentially trying to break up any measure of trust that has been established on day one. Kita, who is your lynch alternative for today? you have posted a list of people you think might be scum. Who among those is the scummiest in your eyes, and why? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On November 05 2011 01:36 GreYMisT wrote: Kita, who is your lynch alternative for today? you have posted a list of people you think might be scum. Who among those is the scummiest in your eyes, and why? Discussing it with red at the moment. | ||
|
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
On November 05 2011 01:14 redFF wrote: holy crap you're now lying scum. and you ignored ptp ... Ok, last post I'm replying to before leaving this to the tender mercies of everyone else: Are you seriously saying posts like On May 31 2011 06:01 redFF wrote: I generally don't like policy lynches, because there are always special circumstances. LAL fine though, you don't need to state it at the beginning of the thread. On May 31 2011 06:50 redFF wrote: Oh if i was mafia who would I hit? Bumatlarge and GM have both shown strong play in games i have observed/played in. BC has a reputation as a good player too. As for this game i'm getting town vibes off both bum and BC, not so much off GM(This isn't me calling him scum). If i was going to say now who i wanted protected i would say Bum and BC. On May 31 2011 08:13 redFF wrote: I'm happy people started to call out Varpulis, especially experienced players, as his posting doesn't sit too well with me. He made a valid point and you told him to come at you? I don't see why a town player would do this. No he doesn't want you to stop posting. He wants you to stop posting bad, pointless stuff. This is weird, I'm not so sure we can be sure mafia has plenty of kp. Also saying you wouldn't be surprised if you saw some 3rd party roles when the OP says they are a distinct possibility is kind of weird and unnecessary. I know this was said jokingly but i think GM might have a point. I don't think I would make a joke like that as town. Could be nothing i guess. (All from PTP) Were not contributions? Because they certainly look like contributions to me. Face it, no game where you are town are you this deliberately unhelpful. By exclusion, you are not town. Now quickly produce a case, I want to see who you consider scum enough to lynch today. Who knows, maybe it will be enough to save you! | ||
| ||
