|
On October 17 2011 04:30 Arctocod wrote:Show nested quote +On October 17 2011 04:24 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On October 17 2011 04:21 Arctocod wrote:
you're a moron cheese Thanks, that completely explains all the issues with what I had to say, I'm glad your trying to encourage me to contribute :/ If all you're going to contribute is trying to point out something that you want to be considered "scumtell" then I'd rather you just shut up. Role-fishing is not a scumtell in itself, it's only if it's done in a scummy way that it isn't. You're trying to paint syllogism scum because you're not thinking. This either makes you dumb or scum, and in both cases I actually don't mind you just shutting up. Are you scum?
What exactly is your idea of a difference between scummy and non-scummy rolefishing?
|
On October 17 2011 04:35 Cyber_Cheese wrote:Show nested quote +On October 17 2011 04:30 Arctocod wrote:On October 17 2011 04:24 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On October 17 2011 04:21 Arctocod wrote:
you're a moron cheese Thanks, that completely explains all the issues with what I had to say, I'm glad your trying to encourage me to contribute :/ If all you're going to contribute is trying to point out something that you want to be considered "scumtell" then I'd rather you just shut up. Role-fishing is not a scumtell in itself, it's only if it's done in a scummy way that it isn't. You're trying to paint syllogism scum because you're not thinking. This either makes you dumb or scum, and in both cases I actually don't mind you just shutting up. Are you scum? What exactly is your idea of a difference between scummy and non-scummy rolefishing?
If scum tries to rolefish it's scummy
But syllo isn't scum, he's just an asshole. There's a difference.
|
On October 17 2011 04:37 Arctocod wrote:Show nested quote +On October 17 2011 04:35 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On October 17 2011 04:30 Arctocod wrote:On October 17 2011 04:24 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On October 17 2011 04:21 Arctocod wrote:
you're a moron cheese Thanks, that completely explains all the issues with what I had to say, I'm glad your trying to encourage me to contribute :/ If all you're going to contribute is trying to point out something that you want to be considered "scumtell" then I'd rather you just shut up. Role-fishing is not a scumtell in itself, it's only if it's done in a scummy way that it isn't. You're trying to paint syllogism scum because you're not thinking. This either makes you dumb or scum, and in both cases I actually don't mind you just shutting up. Are you scum? What exactly is your idea of a difference between scummy and non-scummy rolefishing? If scum tries to rolefish it's scummy But syllo isn't scum, he's just an asshole. There's a difference.
I don't see it.
|
[14:00] <DropBear> so chaoser
[14:00] <DropBear> still no speakee
[14:00] <DropBear> you scummy bugger
[14:00] <hiro> hey dropbear
[14:00] <DropBear> hi hiro
[14:00] <hiro> you never said if you got the framer role
[14:00] <DropBear> well i didnt
[14:00] <DropBear> i didnt choose it
[14:00] <DropBear> but chaoser
[14:00] <DropBear> claims to know who the framer is
[14:00] <hiro> oh,
[14:00] <DropBear> i ask him how he knows
[14:01] <DropBear> and he goes
[14:01] <DropBear> brb
[14:01] <DropBear> half an hour later
[14:01] <DropBear> he "has to leave"
[14:01] <hiro> odd
[14:02] <DropBear> and now hes back in here
[14:02] <DropBear> and he not speaking 
[14:02] <DropBear> and his case on me is hilrious
[14:02] <DropBear> so wats the go chaoser
???
Session Start: Fri Oct 14 15:39:28 2011
Session Ident: DropBear
[15:39] Session Ident: DropBear (QuakeNet, chaoser) (webchat@CPE-124-178-52-119.lns2.pie.bigpond.net.au)
[15:39] <DropBear> hi
[15:39] <DropBear> what do you think of meapak?
[16:41] <chaoser> yo
[16:41] <DropBear> bad timeing
[16:43] <chaoser> ok
[16:43] <chaoser> lol
[16:44] <DropBear> im just going to bed
[16:44] <DropBear> its 440am
[16:44] <DropBear> long story short i want to kill meapak
[16:44] <DropBear> pm me what you think of him if you could please
Session Close: Fri Oct 14 18:11:42 2011
Session Start: Fri Oct 14 18:11:42 2011
Session Ident: DropBear
Session Close: Fri Oct 14 18:23:33 2011
Session Start: Sun Oct 16 11:43:44 2011
Session Ident: DropBear
[11:43] Session Ident: DropBear (QuakeNet, chaoser) (webchat@CPE-124-178-158-22.lns4.pie.bigpond.net.au)
[11:43] <DropBear> so how do you know who the framer is?
Where do I say that??
|
Heist
First off, let's look at this post by Chaoser.
On October 16 2011 04:01 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +On October 16 2011 03:52 heist wrote:
I'll be keeping my vote on Radfield. None of this, I PMed him. He comes across as town. If you are running for mayor I want you posting in the thread itself. The mayors at least should be leaving a mark on the thread, being active, contributing. Mig and Greymist, I feel like you two are feeling secure that you have a couple people believing you're town and doing pretty minimal stuff in the actual forum. I can't tell what you guys really are because you aren't active enough in-thread.
Do I know you guys are town? No. I can't just trust others telling me Greymist is town based on their conversations. And you guys expect me to have PM conversations in order judge for myself. Rather I expect you guys to start posting more in thread to more accurately gauge your alignments.
Radfield, at least, has been doing just that and even though he is better than most at hiding his mafia alignment, he's one of the most active players in thread right now and a really good scum-hunter. if he's better at hiding his mafia alignment why would you vote for him even if he is active??? How do the two cancel each other out???
To which heist replies:
On October 16 2011 04:05 heist wrote:
and the other candidates? they aren't exactly exuding townie to me.
And that implies that no matter what Radfield does, he needs to be killed off immediately since he's so unreadable.
This post is written in direct response to chaoser's point that it's very dangerous to put radfield in office. I don't think anyone can interpret this post as anything other than heist implying he thinks chaoser wants to kill radfield if he gets in office, as he seems to be pointing out the ridiculousness of chaoser being so afraid of putting an unreadable player in office.
But later heist really backtracks on this one:
On October 16 2011 05:09 heist wrote:
I never implied that you wanted Radfield killed off. This is getting stupid.
Which is an outright lie.
I think heist doesn't want to stick his neck out too much, I think he's basically scum who doesn't actually care too much about pushing his reads, he just wants to contribute without actually ever being in danger of being scrutinized.
I think heist would be an excellent lynch target tomorrow.
|
On October 16 2011 21:40 Radfield wrote:
What happens to the thief if the player he tries to steal from is 'jailkeepered'. Does the thief get another shot on a later night, or does he lose his power?
He wastes his ability.
Can the framer cause vanilla townies to 'visit' the NRA member, and hence be killed?
Yes.
|
On October 17 2011 04:37 Arctocod wrote:
If scum tries to rolefish it's scummy
But syllo isn't scum, he's just an asshole. There's a difference.
Let's play nice and not call each other names, please. Thanks!
|
Wow I thought I would have a load to read up on when I got back but today has been really quiet. I'm surprised no one has called for a vig shot on Foolishness, he's very obviously scum at this point especially as Node flipped scum. The rest of the people trying to get greymist elected should be checked, especially WBG.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On October 17 2011 08:47 deconduo wrote:
Wow I thought I would have a load to read up on when I got back but today has been really quiet. I'm surprised no one has called for a vig shot on Foolishness, he's very obviously scum at this point especially as Node flipped scum. The rest of the people trying to get greymist elected should be checked, especially WBG.
Well that made a lot of sense.
|
On October 17 2011 08:47 deconduo wrote:
Wow I thought I would have a load to read up on when I got back but today has been really quiet. I'm surprised no one has called for a vig shot on Foolishness, he's very obviously scum at this point especially as Node flipped scum. The rest of the people trying to get greymist elected should be checked, especially WBG.
yes, I should be checked, when I called on Radfield to lynch node.
Are you retarded?
|
On October 17 2011 08:47 deconduo wrote:
Wow I thought I would have a load to read up on when I got back but today has been really quiet. I'm surprised no one has called for a vig shot on Foolishness, he's very obviously scum at this point especially as Node flipped scum. The rest of the people trying to get greymist elected should be checked, especially WBG.
greymist is probably town.
|
and decon probably scum lol
|
On October 17 2011 08:52 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On October 17 2011 08:47 deconduo wrote:
Wow I thought I would have a load to read up on when I got back but today has been really quiet. I'm surprised no one has called for a vig shot on Foolishness, he's very obviously scum at this point especially as Node flipped scum. The rest of the people trying to get greymist elected should be checked, especially WBG. yes, I should be checked, when I called on Radfield to lynch node.Are you retarded?
How's that relevant?
|
On October 17 2011 08:34 Arctocod wrote:HeistFirst off, let's look at this post by Chaoser. Show nested quote +On October 16 2011 04:01 chaoser wrote:On October 16 2011 03:52 heist wrote:
I'll be keeping my vote on Radfield. None of this, I PMed him. He comes across as town. If you are running for mayor I want you posting in the thread itself. The mayors at least should be leaving a mark on the thread, being active, contributing. Mig and Greymist, I feel like you two are feeling secure that you have a couple people believing you're town and doing pretty minimal stuff in the actual forum. I can't tell what you guys really are because you aren't active enough in-thread.
Do I know you guys are town? No. I can't just trust others telling me Greymist is town based on their conversations. And you guys expect me to have PM conversations in order judge for myself. Rather I expect you guys to start posting more in thread to more accurately gauge your alignments.
Radfield, at least, has been doing just that and even though he is better than most at hiding his mafia alignment, he's one of the most active players in thread right now and a really good scum-hunter. if he's better at hiding his mafia alignment why would you vote for him even if he is active??? How do the two cancel each other out??? To which heist replies: Show nested quote +On October 16 2011 04:05 heist wrote:
and the other candidates? they aren't exactly exuding townie to me.
And that implies that no matter what Radfield does, he needs to be killed off immediately since he's so unreadable.
This post is written in direct response to chaoser's point that it's very dangerous to put radfield in office. I don't think anyone can interpret this post as anything other than heist implying he thinks chaoser wants to kill radfield if he gets in office, as he seems to be pointing out the ridiculousness of chaoser being so afraid of putting an unreadable player in office. But later heist really backtracks on this one: Show nested quote +On October 16 2011 05:09 heist wrote:
I never implied that you wanted Radfield killed off. This is getting stupid. Which is an outright lie. I think heist doesn't want to stick his neck out too much, I think he's basically scum who doesn't actually care too much about pushing his reads, he just wants to contribute without actually ever being in danger of being scrutinized. I think heist would be an excellent lynch target tomorrow.
are you trying to direct ace's target for tonight?
|
On October 17 2011 08:47 deconduo wrote:
Wow I thought I would have a load to read up on when I got back but today has been really quiet. I'm surprised no one has called for a vig shot on Foolishness, he's very obviously scum at this point especially as Node flipped scum. The rest of the people trying to get greymist elected should be checked, especially WBG.
Decon is implying a scum family was pushing Greymist to be elected, and implicating me and foolish of being part of that family.
That's why it's relevant.
|
On October 17 2011 08:52 Arctocod wrote:Show nested quote +On October 17 2011 08:47 deconduo wrote:
Wow I thought I would have a load to read up on when I got back but today has been really quiet. I'm surprised no one has called for a vig shot on Foolishness, he's very obviously scum at this point especially as Node flipped scum. The rest of the people trying to get greymist elected should be checked, especially WBG. greymist is probably town.
Never said he wasn't. Node and Foolishness were hardcore lurky and supported his campaign when they should know better, thats why they are scum. I even said it to you on IRC before Node flipped.
I haven't played with WBG so I before won't say he's scum for certain, but he definitely deserves a check, as does anyone who wanted greymist elected.
|
Also, look at how Foolishness played as mafia in PTP2. Its almost the exact same style and totally different from his town play.
|
On October 17 2011 08:52 wherebugsgo wrote:yes, I should be checked, when I called on Radfield to lynch node.
Are you retarded?
Well you were also the biggest proponent for NOT electing Radfield, so it's odd to take any kind of credit for his actions. Also at one point before the one-liner against node you said you'd get him (Radfield) lynched if he didn't kill plprhz or Chaoser.
But all I want to know is: What is your opinion of Foolishness?
|
On October 17 2011 09:14 Scamp wrote:Show nested quote +On October 17 2011 08:52 wherebugsgo wrote:yes, I should be checked, when I called on Radfield to lynch node.
Are you retarded? Well you were also the biggest proponent for NOT electing Radfield, so it's odd to take any kind of credit for his actions. Also at one point before the one-liner against node you said you'd get him (Radfield) lynched if he didn't kill plprhz or Chaoser. But all I want to know is: What is your opinion of Foolishness?
1. That was before prpl was confirmed town and also before chaoser claimed.
2. I was against electing Radfield but he got elected. So instead I told him who to lynch. Problem?
3. Foolishness is null to me atm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
