|
On October 03 2011 14:37 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2011 13:54 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On October 03 2011 13:43 chaoser wrote:Use and Power
Hider is stronger than Weak Cop in that it cannot be directly killed at Night. This in turn allows it to claim safely and give its targets in advance. In that way, it is a superbly powerful investigative role limited only by the complications that can result from having actions copied onto itself or dying when it investigates scum. That's how a real hider is used. You didn't play in a way that would have invited mafia bullets at all. What a bullshit claim. Why the fuck would Theon Greyjoy be in a Lotr themed game? I'm from an alternate universe and my role is in-character (I'm a greyjoy, we rob the coastline, we also kill people and take their shit) Yours makes no sense in-character. Thanks for the shit claim though. 100% mafia. Where is the quote from? That's just telling mafia which target to hit to get 2 for the price of 1... You're saying that you're playing a role you've never heard about and played before and you didn't go google it? This quote is fro mafiawiki. Obviously you don't tell people in advance who you are hiding behind but you can hint it to people by FOSing them and then when you die they will know. Regardless of that fact, what's your hider ability called? All of the abilities have names. What's yours?
It's called Cloak of the Elves.
|
Wow the games really slow now :/
|
On October 03 2011 20:22 kitaman27 wrote:haha did you just claim mafia?
|
On October 04 2011 01:19 chaoser wrote:
Ok switch back, I find it kind of odd that cyber_cheese decided to hide behind iGrok after he had claimed third party on Night 2, especially since it was very much possible for a vigi to have just shot him.
##vote: cyber_cheese
Sorry everyone but can you please switch back.
I spent a lot of time and energy defending him day 2, and my curiosity of whether it was justified or not overpowered my common sense.
|
|
|
On October 04 2011 01:50 chaoser wrote:
Drazerk and Kita, switch over now please.
For a vanilla townie, your awfully willing to lynch just about anyone
|
On October 04 2011 02:01 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2011 01:59 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On October 04 2011 01:50 chaoser wrote:
Drazerk and Kita, switch over now please. For a vanilla townie, your awfully willing to lynch just about anyone I'm clearly not which is why I've been going back and forth all day trying to figure out this tangled web of scum. Your buddies better kill me tonight before I get the rest of them. Does it feel good to have dropped all pretenses of defense and go after me instead? I'm already confirmed by Drazerk protecting me from a hit by mafia.
When your reply to my explaination of my actions is
On October 04 2011 01:45 chaoser wrote:
lol, bullshit
It's very hard to 'defend'.
This confirmation of you and Drazerk seems to rely heavily on you two confirming each other at the moment too...
|
On October 04 2011 02:06 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2011 02:03 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On October 04 2011 02:01 chaoser wrote:On October 04 2011 01:59 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On October 04 2011 01:50 chaoser wrote:
Drazerk and Kita, switch over now please. For a vanilla townie, your awfully willing to lynch just about anyone I'm clearly not which is why I've been going back and forth all day trying to figure out this tangled web of scum. Your buddies better kill me tonight before I get the rest of them. Does it feel good to have dropped all pretenses of defense and go after me instead? I'm already confirmed by Drazerk protecting me from a hit by mafia. When your reply to my explaination of my actions is On October 04 2011 01:45 chaoser wrote:
lol, bullshit It's very hard to 'defend'. This confirmation of you and Drazerk seems to rely heavily on you two confirming each other at the moment too... Drazerk is already confirmed by Curu. Burns doesn't it? Grasping for straws much?
Not really, I already knew that.
|
On October 04 2011 02:18 Drazerk wrote:
also did GGQ ninja vote?
yes
although he did accuse me much earlier so it's possible he simply forgot
|
|
|
|
|
Well GG
We came so close, It's a shame GGQ didn't make an arguement on trance based off my filter, with the sudden stance change on my last day 
Stuff happens
Here's what made Rayn rage
http://www.mediafire.com/?n73walyf4l73f5n
I ran him though a common word count ^_^
I wonder how long it'll be untill he spells 'becouse' wrong again
Well hosted Curu, sorry for raging about the Eowyn/Éowyn thing, though I do think it's a little harsh to need the word perfect 
|
On October 10 2011 15:35 GreYMisT wrote:
Yea I wasnt able to be too active at the start of this game, My RA training for college was in full swing and this (and MLP at the same time) was the first time I had rolled blue, didnt know how to initially handle it aside from not posting too much. I felt like I started to get the hang of it later on, but it was too little too late on my part.
The kill on you was more or less random.
In particular there are three things I would change in hindsight.
1) I feel like we should have attacked Drazerk instead of trying to bomb him (with ) because it was a weekend.
2) I should have realized I'd claimed to be ok with lynching neutrals on day1//Not defended iGrok to that extent. Or not said I was ok with it and defended iGrok that much.
3) Chosen my claim right on day 1 and played accordingly, or not claimed at all.
Oh and attacking chaoser/trance over that last night could have thrown suspicion on Heist for not dying
|
On October 17 2011 03:57 JACCUZISPLAT wrote:Show nested quote +On October 17 2011 03:56 qrs wrote:
OK, question for y'all players. I've just spent more hours than I care to admit reading through basically the whole game, like a mystery novel. I know that sometimes it's easier to see things from the outside, and also, I had plenty of wrong guesses as I read the thread, but I was 99% sure that kitaman was Mafia for ages before the town finally voted to lynch him.
It was the chat logs that supposedly "proved" kita's innocence to most of the town, but I never understood what they supposedly proved, since no one could refute them. As far as I could understand, no one could even prove or disprove that they had taken place at all, at the claimed times or at any others. What was it about the time stamps that was supposed to be so convincing? Was it that they matched up with referenced events in the thread? They proved nothing, town was being retarded.
This. I was telling him not to use them or he might have posted them much sooner. I had assumed him posting the logs wouldn't change anything.
On October 16 2011 10:14 raynpelikoneet wrote:
You all should give credit to Palmar. Fuck yeah, he won. Gratz man. GG You played awesome. ggwp.
Why town left him alive is a mystery to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/tCp90.gif)
