BC's Arkham Asylum - Page 102

On July 23 2011 17:58 Kenpachi wrote:

thats cool with me. btw thats not my strategy and i couldn't care less about being a townie. My job is to absorb hits (but I'm immortal because i don't die)

oh i know, im going to see if you were scummy this game. You know what this means, a possible analysis! If not, you arent scummy.

On July 27 2011 08:07 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
Also, even though palmar is almost certainly batman I feel we can use him for our gain. Keep in mind that batman and our win condition are not dependent on one another, we can both technically win. Sure we could spite smite palmar into death, but I say we just use him. Basically, we control where his KP goes every night while aiming for scum, and we let him live. The moment he doesn't listen to us, we kill him.

On that note, Palmar I order you to kill Lucidity. If anyone has an actual issue with that feel free to let me know.

On July 27 2011 08:08 Palmar wrote:


I order a pizza.

On July 27 2011 08:24 supersoft wrote:


is that a yes?

On July 27 2011 08:07 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
Also, even though palmar is almost certainly batman I feel we can use him for our gain. Keep in mind that batman and our win condition are not dependent on one another, we can both technically win. Sure we could spite smite palmar into death, but I say we just use him. Basically, we control where his KP goes every night while aiming for scum, and we let him live. The moment he doesn't listen to us, we kill him.

On that note, Palmar I order you to kill Lucidity. If anyone has an actual issue with that feel free to let me know.

On July 27 2011 07:42 Zona wrote:
Also, is this a bulletproof claim that we all missed earlier?

On July 27 2011 10:01 snotboogie wrote:


Sure, but why?

I still think scumhunting other likely candidates is a good move for Day 1 but for the reasons I outlined above I am against changing votes away from Supersoft.

I find your "analysis" very, very unconvincing. You're reaching at straws when you say "This also contradicts his previous post about how he was voting for Mig based on the PM; here he is saying that PM ruins games, but in the previous post he uses it as total evidence." He is voting here for Mig because, obviously, he believes Mig has an opinion on PMs consistent with Mafia - that is, YM believes Mafia likes sticking to PM because presumably there are less eyes on the information, and co-ordinating analysis on different bits of PMs between different people is harder than analysing public posts.

YM tries to avoid PMs, and believes Mig is scummy (at least in this particular instance) because Mig seems very intent on advocating PMs. The logic here is clear to me and I believe you using the fact that YM is basing his vote on a PM is deliberately missing the point. Furthermore YM is consistent in his dislike of PMs by publicly airing his conversation here.

Further I am inclined to believe notasmurf, not only because he was town but because he knew enough that he was going to be killed and still trusted YM.

Now YM's post where he reemphasized the facts of Honeypot - I, as a Townie, took that post to be a reminder for us Townies to scumhunt based on data that good work went into. Further it was a summary of a heavy piece of work that was a very logical topic of discussion since it was only the previous page that it was revealed.

You instead took this as YM trying to give himself town cred - you've not only obviously given a lot of thought into a scum perspective on things (hmm...) but you're reeeeeaaaachingggg, bro. In fact I found your ENTIRE ANALYSIS reaching. It reeks of scum panicking under pressure.