EPTExperiment Mafia II - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Blue1
71 Posts
| ||
|
red2
18 Posts
/facepalm | ||
|
red2
18 Posts
On April 27 2011 06:09 Blue1 wrote: The question is, why were you doing it? Why pop up now? Time to take the focus off your buddy? Nope i was just making an observation about how you guys are ignoring other players like me. | ||
|
Blue1
71 Posts
| ||
|
red2
18 Posts
On April 27 2011 06:11 Blue1 wrote: You didn't answer my 2 first questions. I was busy getting a tooth pulled. and "why pop up now" is a silly question. your asking me why I came to participate in the game? should i just never start posting? | ||
|
Protoss1
47 Posts
On April 27 2011 06:03 Blue1 wrote: No lynch is terrible for town. The only way to kill mafia is to lynch. If we vote no lynch we only have a new day 1 all over again with one less townie. Also Protoss1 hinting blue in two posts annoys me greatly and I don't see how this can be pro-town. I don't believe people, newbie or not, can be this naive. I have not "hinted" anything. You thought I was suspicious for how I introduced myself ("obvious bandwagoner is obvious"), I said I was surprised you were being so hostile when we are just getting to know each other. And then I did not vote for you. I do not feel I have been naive about anything, so I'm not really sure where that's coming from. You still continue to be accusatory while my explanations are written off as scummy deception, so at this point I'm not sure what would satisfy you. | ||
|
purple2
56 Posts
Indeed. | ||
|
red2
18 Posts
yeah man cause your so good at scum hunting you dont even need to look for scum. they just stop by and say "look at me im lurking lynch me" Your a real credit to town. | ||
|
Blue1
71 Posts
| ||
|
Blue1
71 Posts
On April 27 2011 06:14 red2 wrote: I was busy getting a tooth pulled. and "why pop up now" is a silly question. your asking me why I came to participate in the game? should i just never start posting? You contradict yourself. First you say you were lurking and now you say you were busy. | ||
|
red2
18 Posts
On April 27 2011 06:24 Blue1 wrote: You contradict yourself. First you say you were lurking and now you say you were busy. well I stopped by to read the thread a couple times while i was out but didnt post cause i was on my phone. thats lurking while busy. | ||
|
red2
18 Posts
| ||
|
Blue1
71 Posts
| ||
|
Random4
24 Posts
| ||
|
purple2
56 Posts
On April 27 2011 06:23 red2 wrote: yeah man cause your so good at scum hunting you dont even need to look for scum. they just stop by and say "look at me im lurking lynch me" Your a real credit to town. I admit that sometimes the tooth fairy drops them in my lap. | ||
|
Blue1
71 Posts
Activity: As far as activity goes in this game, I am not using the standard rule. I hold you all tot he agreement you made and expect a commitment. I will nudge someone for inactivity to get them to post more, but I won't mod kill them. Punishments will be handed out post game with the severity and terms listed in the sign up thread. ... I will say this one more time. The two cardinal sins in this game are as follow. 1. Trying to find out AKA's of players, or who is in the game. 2. Inactivity. Neither will result in an immediate mod kill, but afterwords I will do everything in my power to make you suffer. Which can be quite a lot. I think this is incentive enough to make people post. I don't think a huge analysis at this point is necessary as I've pretty much commented on every post he's made so far and I don't feel like repeating myself. For now we have to use the info we have so far and I'm voting on the person I find most likely to be scum. Red is a close candidate though. If you don't feel the same way and have any leads on others I sugest you share it. | ||
|
Orange2
103 Posts
On April 27 2011 08:18 Blue1 wrote: This is from the op: Activity: As far as activity goes in this game, I am not using the standard rule. I hold you all tot he agreement you made and expect a commitment. I will nudge someone for inactivity to get them to post more, but I won't mod kill them. Punishments will be handed out post game with the severity and terms listed in the sign up thread. ... I will say this one more time. The two cardinal sins in this game are as follow. 1. Trying to find out AKA's of players, or who is in the game. 2. Inactivity. Neither will result in an immediate mod kill, but afterwords I will do everything in my power to make you suffer. Which can be quite a lot. I think this is incentive enough to make people post. I don't think a huge analysis at this point is necessary as I've pretty much commented on every post he's made so far and I don't feel like repeating myself. For now we have to use the info we have so far and I'm voting on the person I find most likely to be scum. Red is a close candidate though. If you don't feel the same way and have any leads on others I sugest you share it. I would agree with you, but as the last experiment proved the threat of excessive banning is not enough to persuade subjects to post as much as they should, which is why I believe we should be pressuring inactives/lurkers. I disliked Zerg's caps-locked attitude but he seems to have recovered from it and I now have no problem keeping him around. I fail to see why red pointing out that inactives are a problem makes him scum, he clearly stuck out his neck when it wasn't necessary to point out to us that the mafia could just be skating by, without being really pressured, and you guys want to lynch him for it? Once everyone has posted something of substance we can start worrying about scumhunting, but as far as we know the scum team has yet to post and are giggling franticly in a corner, watching us shove each other closer to the incinerator. Assume for a second you guys are right, and protoss is the newbiest of newbie mafias if thats the case even if we leave him around and pressure inactives now he is going to make some kind of major mistake that gives him away or revert to typical newbie mafia behavior, which we *will* catch him at. I'm content to leave him around in the knowledge that we will know if he is scum or not sooner rather than later. I'd much rather poke the people not doing anything to see how they squirm. On no lynch. Town almost never benefits from no lynch, in 98% of the previous experiments all no lynching did was fail to provide information and basically recreate day 1, nolynch provided no real benefits, and in the end meant the town had one less person to work with. yellow1 pink2 green2 have yet to make substantial contributions, and it annoys me, I did not know I could get annoyed, but apparently I can | ||
|
Blue1
71 Posts
| ||
|
Orange2
103 Posts
If you want to generate more information I suggest reevaluating your case against protoss and seeing if you can find any new angles to it, if you do post them and evaluate how he reacts to it. Just my suggestions. <3 | ||
|
Orange2
103 Posts
| ||
| ||
