On February 11 2011 16:56 gryffindor wrote:
So, let me get this straight, you're defending him by saying he plays the same way as both town and scum?

Fantastic point. Coag has definitely shown us no indication of at least trying to help town. He's an easy choice. Present a better candidate, Node, or just inform coagulation that he needs to change his meta. Who needs RNG?

gryffindor

United States524 Posts

February 11 2011 08:14 GMT

#182

I, for one, won't be jumping on the easy bandwagon. Call it hesitance if it will, but I am not going to blindly follow the town because the scum can easily buddy-up to town players, and steer mislynches. Node read as buddying up to Coagulation to me, he could easily be scum.

Node

United States2159 Posts

February 11 2011 08:23 GMT

#183

On February 11 2011 16:56 gryffindor wrote:
So, let me get this straight, you're defending him by saying he plays the same way as both town and scum?

I'm not defending him in particular. I don't think there's enough to go on to lynch anybody, yet. You asked for a read on Coagulation, and I gave it to you. Do I want his play to improve? Certainly. Does that change my opinion on him now? Nope.

I haven't actually played with a scum Coagulation in a long time. I think the only game I've played with him where that happened was Haunted Mafia, back in October (?). I don't think that he's actually done anything scummy yet this game. He's been a little spammy, but he hasn't contributed (or, more importantly, posed as having contributed) or done the sort of thing that actually rings warning bells for me.

Misder

United States1557 Posts

February 11 2011 08:32 GMT

#184

I, for one, don't believe Coagulation is mafia, yet. Everyone's reasoning on voting for him is kinda bad reasoning.

Vote: thefluffyone93

gryffindor

United States524 Posts

February 11 2011 08:34 GMT

#185

I have to agree with Misder. Node is reading as if he is buddying up to defend a mislynch as scum.
vote: Node

Believer

Sweden212 Posts

February 11 2011 08:36 GMT

#186

I think alot of people are jumping to conclusions here, not naming anyone of course.

There is yet much time left on this day, it might be worth biding one's time.

Ace

United States16096 Posts

February 11 2011 08:37 GMT

#187

actually gryffindor he answered your question - even though if it was terrible since he never defended Coagulation. What he did wasn't even buddying. Why so jumpy sir? And it only took you 2 minutes between reading Misder's post and voting to come firm to this conclusion?

Are you voting just to vote or do you honestly think Node is scummy?

Coagulation

United States9633 Posts

February 11 2011 08:38 GMT

#188

On February 11 2011 17:04 bumatlarge wrote:

Show nested quote +

Fantastic point. Coag has definitely shown us no indication of at least trying to help town. He's an easy choice. Present a better candidate, Node, or just inform coagulation that he needs to change his meta. Who needs RNG?

really man?

On February 11 2011 13:50 Coagulation wrote:
We should lynch zerroth
because the last game
completely inactive
only posted/vote to avoid modkill etc

Lets get the inactives out now

lets look at your contributions so far in this game

On January 23 2011 01:09 bumatlarge wrote:

Show nested quote +

Ohhh a penalty-esque game? I do have to redeem myself for the last one for Ace -_-

/In!

Awesome you joined the game!

On February 11 2011 15:29 bumatlarge wrote:
Alright time to get started.
Yep
Hopefully I can make good use of this role, as I have to do the character justice.
Filler
Coagulation has already spouted off to his random tangents, so we might be better off without him.
shows willingness to jump on the easy bandwagon. cause scum love easy bandwagons. that makes town sit around and not analyze people.
I still want to see what everyone is posting like, because I am seeing a good number of sentence long posts with nothing in it.
similar to this post.
Too be expected. I'm not putting my vote anywhere yet until I see what I want to see.
what is this? theres nothing of any value to your post so far for town.
"im not gonna vote"
awesome thanks for letting us know.

On February 11 2011 17:04 bumatlarge wrote:

Show nested quote +

So wait.. i clearly showed you my indication of trying to help town. you disregarded that to blow out of proportion that i am anti town for your own purposes clearly.
If you need an example of me trying to help town with info go ahead an read up top again.

your last post you decided your not gonna vote...OK......And now im the EASY Choice?
What changed your mind?

I'm not putting my vote anywhere yet until I see what I want to see.

What did you see?
Sounds wishy washy to me. I dont think you seen anything but an easy lynch.
And mafia love easy lynches. because it makes town not focus on scumhunting.
is that what you seen?

if your mafia
im going to hand your ass to town on a silver platter.
I will be watching you.

Node

United States2159 Posts

February 11 2011 08:42 GMT

#189

On February 11 2011 17:34 gryffindor wrote:
I have to agree with Misder. Node is reading as if he is buddying up to defend a mislynch as scum.
vote: Node

I don't follow what you said. You think my plan is to let Coagulation die (even though I'm apparently defending him), and then when we realize that he's not scum (which, as far as I know, we can't), come out and say "I told you so". Do I have it right?

aidnai

United States1159 Posts

February 11 2011 08:44 GMT

#190

On February 11 2011 16:17 gryffindor wrote:
I see Coagulation is spazzing out. Why are you spamming the thread?

I have a town read already, but I will not disclose on who, and a casual suspicion. I will have to wait to see if I can pick up on any associative tells from them in the future. I might be reading too much into the situation. I do not want to tip them off to tighten up their game, though, as I want to see them lynched.

I am not really for Day 1 policy lynches if the person is town. Does anyone have any meta on Coagulation? I don't want to lose a player to a mislynch, though I do not know his alignment. Can anyone help out on this?

Thanks!

On February 11 2011 16:51 Node wrote:

Show nested quote +

Coagulation is generally known for being spammy and in general terrible. That's not to say it's entirely true, but it's what he's known for. However, he often has decent reads on who is mafia, but isn't really able to back them up with proper analysis and arguments.

For instance, in XXXVI he correctly identified about half of the scum team in his posts. Everybody ignored him, and I can't blame them for doing so. The rest of his posts were mostly spam and defense of himself when he was called out for being spammy.

His play is ordinary so far.

On February 11 2011 16:56 gryffindor wrote:
So, let me get this straight, you're defending him by saying he plays the same way as both town and scum?

So let me get this straight... You ask for meta on Coag because he's acting strange, Node gives it to you, then all the sudden Node is scum for buddying up to Coag who is all of a sudden likely town? Damn, you're either light years ahead of me...or...That doesn't really make sense does it?

FOS on gryffindor. I won't change my vote yet, until more people have posted and I have reads on more people. But your logic for voting Node is suspect to say the least.

Node is correct about Coag by the way, whether or not either of them is scum. Coag has done nothing unusual for his own 'meta' so far this game.

Coagulation

United States9633 Posts

February 11 2011 08:44 GMT

#191

Yes i am known as a impossible to read player.
But i am also a VERY OUTSPOKEN player at the same time.
I NEVER HIDE. Im always 100% UPFRONT and straight to the point.
And there are also many people who will confirm that i am an extremely HONEST player.
Im telling you guys
Zerroth is the best lynch
Your gonna get zero information on him.
Not because hes a hard to read player but because he doesnt post anything tangible at all.
and its alot worse having that around in the game than it is to have a hard to read player.

Ace

United States16096 Posts

February 11 2011 08:47 GMT

#192

Actually a hard to read player is still bad

If you don't appear Pro-Town to me why would I want to keep you alive?

Coagulation

United States9633 Posts

February 11 2011 08:53 GMT

#193

because i dont fuck around when i see bullshit. i call it and i call people on it. maybe recklessly but i still get the shit out in the open. and that makes people talk. and when people are forced to talk about their bullshit they tend to leave themselves open to scumslips and incriminating evidence .

Node

United States2159 Posts

February 11 2011 08:56 GMT

#194

On February 11 2011 17:47 Ace wrote:
Actually a hard to read player is still bad

Speak for yourself.

Coagulation

United States9633 Posts

February 11 2011 08:58 GMT

#195

and for the record i was townie in haunted mafia.

Ace

United States16096 Posts

February 11 2011 08:59 GMT

#196

On February 11 2011 17:56 Node wrote:

Show nested quote +

Speak for yourself.

if you dont agree then tell me why :D

gryffindor

United States524 Posts

February 11 2011 09:08 GMT

#197

unvote
My vote was more for pressure than anything. It didn't really gain the reaction that I wanted.

@Misder, why are you voting who you are voting?

gryffindor

United States524 Posts

February 11 2011 09:11 GMT

#198

p.s. I'm assuming you're only voting for him because he's voting for you

darmousseh

United States3437 Posts

February 11 2011 09:20 GMT

#199

Vote: zerroth

He was inactive in the last game and I don't think that will change in this game. I don't think spending the first lynch on an active player is a good idea. After the first night its fine, but odds are we are just lynching a townie. Better to lynch an inactive on night 1.