|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On January 28 2011 12:13 Coagulation wrote:sure like now i can point out how extremely aggressive kitaman27 is pushing suspicion on me for no reason and say its starting to look scummy. + Show Spoiler +"So there has been nothing this entire game that has been worth posting about? Not a single person that seems fishy?" i gave you an example that proves your blowing things out of proportion.
I wouldn't say its suspicion for no reason. The fact that haven't contributed anything is what makes you look suspicious. The fact that you can provide only a single weak post out of 900 posts in the thread doesn't really seem like blowing things out of proportion.
|
when town its usually best to lay low unless theres a reason not to.
when late game comes i post more.
also many people will confirm that i post 100x more when im mafia.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On January 28 2011 12:17 Coagulation wrote:
when town its usually best to lay low unless theres a reason not to.
when late game comes i post more.
also many people will confirm that i post 100x more when im mafia.
What reason is there a reason to lay low? Is there something to hide from?
An active thread provides more information so when you get to late game, you actually have something to go by.
|
On January 28 2011 12:19 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2011 12:17 Coagulation wrote:
when town its usually best to lay low unless theres a reason not to.
when late game comes i post more.
also many people will confirm that i post 100x more when im mafia. What reason is there a reason to lay low? Is there something to hide from? mafia hits SK hitsAn active thread provides more information so when you get to late game, you actually have something to go by.
ok
|
EBWOP
On January 28 2011 12:22 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2011 12:19 kitaman27 wrote:On January 28 2011 12:17 Coagulation wrote:
when town its usually best to lay low unless theres a reason not to.
when late game comes i post more.
also many people will confirm that i post 100x more when im mafia. What reason is there a reason to lay low? Is there something to hide from? mafia hits SK hitsAn active thread provides more information so when you get to late game, you actually have something to go by. ok
|
United States22154 Posts
On January 28 2011 12:23 Coagulation wrote:EBWOP Show nested quote +On January 28 2011 12:22 Coagulation wrote:On January 28 2011 12:19 kitaman27 wrote:On January 28 2011 12:17 Coagulation wrote:
when town its usually best to lay low unless theres a reason not to.
when late game comes i post more.
also many people will confirm that i post 100x more when im mafia. What reason is there a reason to lay low? Is there something to hide from? mafia hits SK hitsAn active thread provides more information so when you get to late game, you actually have something to go by. ok
As town though its our job to get information by any and all means, even if it means dying for it. I mean unless you serve some other function by staying alive then you should post much and often. If I weren't buried in school work then I would certainly post more. (Ok, now back to studying calculus)
|
Sorry, I've been gone all day, had school, then had to go to hospital, then was at a restaurant with my brother for his birthday. Just read through thread.
So what do people think we should do with the lurkers? How should we treat them? It looks like we actually have about 13 people with only around 10 posts, give or take 4. That's about half the player list. I think we can safely assume that there's going to be at least a couple mafia hiding in there, with only a few posts. I'd like to hear what the rest of town thinks we should do. We may not have a ton of time before tomorrow's lynch to do much about it without distracting from the actual lynch, but I think it may be worth it to potentially do a little pressure voting on lurkers (later), or else just call them out on it (like what just happened to Coag while I was writing this). By lurker, I mean someone who is just reading and not contributing, or just writing posts that say: "Yeah, I agree", or "Good analysis d00d", or other spam. It'd be nice to see more people get active, or at least provide their own opinions, fleshed out somewhat, or their original analysis.
For example, a few people, Mr. Zergling, Divinek, Amber[Light], d3, where are you? None of you have really posted since the election or directly after night 1 ended, what's up?
|
United States22154 Posts
Mr. Wiggles, I belive BloodyC0bbler (I think I miss pelt that but w/e) said it pretty well in the TL Town Breakdown Thread
"IF people are routinely inactive, or exceptionally spammy/stupid. Town is not wasting lynches if they lynch them, nor are vigilante’s wasting hits on them. These are players that hurt the town as much if not worse than mafia."
Hence I think we should pressure and, if we don't get satisfactory results, lynch them. For now, I'm going to vote Coagulation , I may switch over to another equaly inactive player later, but for now Coagulation's pro inactive attitude seems highly suspicious to me.
|
im not pro inactive jesus
|
On January 28 2011 12:30 GMarshal wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2011 12:23 Coagulation wrote:EBWOP On January 28 2011 12:22 Coagulation wrote:On January 28 2011 12:19 kitaman27 wrote:On January 28 2011 12:17 Coagulation wrote:
when town its usually best to lay low unless theres a reason not to.
when late game comes i post more.
also many people will confirm that i post 100x more when im mafia. What reason is there a reason to lay low? Is there something to hide from? mafia hits SK hitsAn active thread provides more information so when you get to late game, you actually have something to go by. ok As town though its our job to get information by any and all means, even if it means dying for it. I mean unless you serve some other function by staying alive then you should post much and often. If I weren't buried in school work then I would certainly post more. (Ok, now back to studying calculus)
|
Kav looks like hes doing a good job so far he has covered all the bases i have seen.
But dont worry i do got a list of you scummy fuckers its just not time to start shoving them down everyones fucking throat yet
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On January 28 2011 12:56 GMarshal wrote:
Hence I think we should pressure and, if we don't get satisfactory results, lynch them. For now, I'm going to vote Coagulation , I may switch over to another equaly inactive player later, but for now Coagulation's pro inactive attitude seems highly suspicious to me.
Despite me poking at coag, I still think we should focus the lynch between nemesis and RoL rather than spread it out between a bunch of people. RoL has been laying low relative to how he started and nemesis hasn't really defended himself adequately either.
|
United States22154 Posts
On January 28 2011 13:04 Coagulation wrote:
Kav looks like hes doing a good job so far he has covered all the bases i have seen.
But dont worry i do got a list of you scummy fuckers its just not time to start shoving them down everyones fucking throat yet
Fine, I'll retract my vote on you (as soon as I find a better target), but I expect to see that list sooner rather than later, and if you don't come through I'll make sure you hang.
|
On January 28 2011 13:04 Coagulation wrote:
Kav looks like hes doing a good job so far he has covered all the bases i have seen.
But dont worry i do got a list of you scummy fuckers its just not time to start shoving them down everyones fucking throat yet
I would disagree with you. I'd love to see that list right now.
|
also i just want to point out that blood seems to be a pretty fucking common theme in storys about murdering people if you guys think theres some kind of correlation between me and people who bleed when killed because of my name then your investigative skills are questionable at best.
|
My input on activeness, totally my opinion.
On January 28 2011 11:03 SiNiquity wrote:
On January 28 2011 09:12 LunarDestiny wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2011 09:09 darmousseh wrote:
There seem to be a lot of people who are not posting anything. Are people always this inactive? Give me a list and I'll try to tell you.
Over active
Same
Under active
No color = don't know/not enough games with/forgot
- Amber[LighT] (13)
- Beneather (13)
- BrownBear (31)
- bumatlarge (34)
- Coagulation (9)
- CubEdIn (26)
- darmousseh (48)
- Divinek (5)
- DoctorHelvetica (21) / d3_crescentia (4)
- Eti307 (4)
- GMarshal (22)
- ilovejonn (31)
- Impervious (13)
- Jackal58 (31)
- Kavdragon (96)
- Kenpachi (13)
- kitaman27 (38)
- LunarDestiny (66)
- Meapak_Ziphh (36)
- Mr. Wiggles (52)
- Mr.Zergling (7)
- Nemesis (19)
- Nfi (2) / Barundar (10)
- OriginalName (9)
- Pandain (9) / deconduo (4)
- papapanda (12)
- RebirthOfLeGenD (37)
- SiNiquity (20)
- TheAldo (6)
- tube (3)
- zerroth (10)
[/green]
And while I'm at it:
Names which could be clues:
- Coagulation: ...the drying blood staining his feet...
- LunarDestiny: And there in the clearing, in the moonlight...
|
United States22154 Posts
@LunarDestiny: I think that the names wouldn't be clues because its too evident, unless their profiles are otherwise bare, I suspect that the mods would make us work harder for results, this is why I think the RoL and Nemesis clue analysis both have merits, because they aren't immediately evident, and actually required work to uncover.
|
On January 28 2011 13:20 GMarshal wrote:
@LunarDestiny: I think that the names wouldn't be clues because its too evident, unless their profiles are otherwise bare, I suspect that the mods would make us work harder for results, this is why I think the RoL and Nemesis clue analysis both have merits, because they aren't immediately evident, and actually required work to uncover.
I didn't point out the clues. SiNiquity did. I just fulfill my request of describing people's activeness.
Also, I based most info on the 8 games that I played.
|
United States22154 Posts
I wasn't disagreeing with the post activity list, I think its a great effort, I wouldn't be able to contribute half as much as I don't know how much these guys usually post. I just addressed the name thing at you because I saw the "while I'm at it addendum" in your post, I just assumed it was your idea, apologies to you and SiNiquity for my confusion.
|
lunar didnt post that it was carried over from the original list
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
