| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
seRapH
United States9776 Posts
On November 15 2010 15:43 Ace wrote: Great now figure out who owns it. You can't. Isn't this why I suggest a mass province claim? Worst that could happen with this is that we get Mafia x2 suspects. If there're 6 mafia that's 12 suspects. Not bad. If caller meant that there's no way for town, even cooperating, to stack attacks then fine, half the plan is worthless. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Good luck with your plan! | ||
|
Caller
Poland8075 Posts
seraph i already explained that only people on the same faction can stack. two random people can't say they will stack on a person. That's just silly when (in game) you don't have any solid trust with the other person. | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
On November 15 2010 15:57 Caller wrote: i'm feeling lenient so you get 12 more hours for night actions. seraph i already explained that only people on the same faction can stack. two random people can't say they will stack on a person. That's just silly when (in game) you don't have any solid trust with the other person. you shouldnt slow the game down because people are 2 lazy to send in night actions. if they dont take the time to properly defend or w/e and get killed thats their own fault.. think of it as a modkill for being inactive except dished out by the active players. | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
| ||
|
Hesmyrr
Canada5776 Posts
The Caller's confirmation that unofficial PM alliance do not stack their kills is good news though (I just asked him via PM and he confirmed it); should help to reduce the chaos somewhat if defending oneself is almost assured protection til nation with multiple province/fronts appears as long as gunpowder/elite soldier roles don't behave stupidly. | ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
On November 15 2010 15:57 Caller wrote: i'm feeling lenient so you get 12 more hours for night actions. seraph i already explained that only people on the same faction can stack. two random people can't say they will stack on a person. That's just silly when (in game) you don't have any solid trust with the other person. -_- longest mafia game ever... | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
On November 15 2010 15:47 seRapH wrote: Isn't this why I suggest a mass province claim? Worst that could happen with this is that we get Mafia x2 suspects. If there're 6 mafia that's 12 suspects. Not bad. If caller meant that there's no way for town, even cooperating, to stack attacks then fine, half the plan is worthless. Feel free to claim. I'm listening | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
On November 15 2010 14:15 Ace wrote: 3.) Read the rules: You CANT PUNISH PEOPLE FOR ATTACKING! So you don't know who claimed what province. Fine. Let's just all gang up on the guy who was aggressive and pop him! WHOOPS! What's that? The player that pops someone Night 1, who is suspected of being Scum because he didn't play by your non-majority sanctioned little rules ends up taking someone out of the game and defends on Night 2. Oh snap - you can't punish him! Why? Because you need players that are directly allied to break him. Are all pro-town players directly allied? I don't see that anywhere in the rules, especially since you know, Caller hinted at this being broken up into factions. Oh wow, that changes a lot | ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
This is something I thought everyone realized. The only way to really punish an attacker is to lynch him. Or to use a special blue role or something. But in order to lynch, you must convince everyone to lynch. Thus, seraph, your plan is hardly "fail-safe". | ||
|
Veldril
Thailand1817 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On November 16 2010 00:00 jcarlsoniv wrote: This is something I thought everyone realized. The only way to really punish an attacker is to lynch him. Or to use a special blue role or something. But in order to lynch, you must convince everyone to lynch. Thus, seraph, your plan is hardly "fail-safe". Either everyone doesn't read the rules or they are scum trying to lol us with some crap plan. So seraph, LSB are you bad townies or genius scum? | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
I couldnt imagine a mafia would feel the need to build an alliance solely based on geographical location. seraph however from his posting in this thread and a brief exchange of pm's i feel might be up to something. | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
On November 16 2010 00:44 Coagulation wrote: I feel fairly certain lsb is pro town I couldnt imagine a mafia would feel the need to build an alliance solely based on geographical location. seraph however from his posting in this thread and a brief exchange of pm's i feel might be up to something. I agree that I don't think LSB is scum just because he didn't read the rules seeing as he has been arguing with seraph over being passive the whole time. However, if you're going to play, you have to read the freaking rules... I don't feel as sure about seraph. The only thing that makes me feel like he is town is the fact that he came out with his non-aggression plan immediately, and is no sticking his neck out because of it. However, this can get a little WIFOM, so I don't want to dwell on it. As Ace said, PM land can be dangerous, be careful. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Chezinu
United States7448 Posts
On November 16 2010 02:16 Ace wrote: god DAMN Caller what's the hold up? I've gotta see how much extra land I conquered last night. I was thinking the same thing, I want to see my empire expand! | ||
|
Veldril
Thailand1817 Posts
| ||
|
Caller
Poland8075 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
Wardi Open
Wardi Open
Replay Cast
WardiTV Korean Royale
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
Kung Fu Cup
Classic vs Solar
herO vs Cure
Reynor vs GuMiho
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
RSL Revival
Solar vs Zoun
MaxPax vs Bunny
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
