EPTWorld at War Mafia - Page 43
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Versatile
United States396 Posts
| ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
On March 26 2010 12:28 Versatile wrote: why are you telling people to nuke me? take it back. You told people not to anti-nuke me. If I die, you'll see my role and you should die as responsibility right there. That said, the only person I think should be nuked is tree.hugger. Nuking players get nuked. This is the exact type of stupidity that I wanted to avoid by going through with the threat to nuke RoL. | ||
|
Versatile
United States396 Posts
in any case, tree.hugger tried to be nice to you and you just kinda threw it back in his face. and then he nuked you. THAT shyt was funny. but zona's point about saving anti-nukes applies as well. | ||
|
johnnyspazz
Taiwan1470 Posts
On March 26 2010 12:35 Versatile wrote: but zona's point about saving anti-nukes applies as well. then it would be a good idea to save me since i have nukes and anti-nukes that i can't use until day 2 | ||
|
Versatile
United States396 Posts
| ||
|
Elemenope
Burkina Faso1704 Posts
On March 26 2010 12:36 johnnyspazz wrote: then it would be a good idea to save me since i have nukes and anti-nukes that i can't use until day 2 wat | ||
|
johnnyspazz
Taiwan1470 Posts
| ||
|
Zona
40426 Posts
On March 26 2010 12:24 tree.hugger wrote: Here's what I have to say: - If L is not mafia, he might be saved. - If L is mafia, he will definitely be saved. - There is no way this nuke will be as successful as I wish it could be. But at least it might make L a little more friendly and constructive. Why did you launch the nuke if you figured it likely wouldn't be successful? You've just put a lot of heat on yourself for the slim chance of getting rid of L. I highly doubt L will change how he plays because of it. He's consistently like this over multiple games, he'll either die or continue to be himself. | ||
|
johnnyspazz
Taiwan1470 Posts
On March 26 2010 12:38 Elemenope wrote: wat my country is mentally retarded, nothing i can really do about it | ||
|
Versatile
United States396 Posts
On March 26 2010 12:38 johnnyspazz wrote: whoa calm down buddy jesus lmao. it was a jay-z quote. haha. | ||
|
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On March 26 2010 12:39 johnnyspazz wrote: my country is mentally retarded, nothing i can really do about it Then you are.... Romania! | ||
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
*** Let me qualify an earlier statement. If you are town-aligned and have anti-nukes and are thinking about using them to save L, please refrain from doing so, or deciding so until the very last minute. As I noted before, should L be mafia, he will be saved no matter what, so let the mafia waste one of their anti-nukes first. Play this like a game of chicken, and if you're more convinced of L's innocence then I am, then go ahead and take the action you deem necessary. On March 26 2010 12:38 Zona wrote: Why did you launch the nuke if you figured it likely wouldn't be successful? You've just put a lot of heat on yourself for the slim chance of getting rid of L. I highly doubt L will change how he plays because of it. He's consistently like this over multiple games, he'll either die or continue to be himself. I launched the nuke for two reasons: - The first was that L had it coming. If he's town, and the nuke kills him, then at least we'll be spared his incessant whining and opining until the next mafia game. (and he invariably will try to kill me off immediately, but that's a fight for another day...). I know he probably won't change, but I was getting tired of him anyway. - The second reason was that I'm curious to see if L is mafia or not. About the only way I can force a rolecheck is by nuking the dude. If he's saved, hopefully enough people will see the light, and we'll also get the name of one of the mafia-aligned countries. On March 26 2010 12:31 L wrote: You told people not to anti-nuke me. If I die, you'll see my role and you should die as responsibility right there. That said, the only person I think should be nuked is tree.hugger. Nuking players get nuked. This is the exact type of stupidity that I wanted to avoid by going through with the threat to nuke RoL. I know we don't have a great history of making deals, but I'll offer another one. In honor of L's oft-used tactic of pretending to sacrifice himself to win a vote, I will vote to lynch myself tomorrow if L flips green, and if there are more than ten votes to kill me. (I won't vote for myself if there aren't the votes, because that would be counter-productive to the town's interests to throw away a vote.) However, let me repeat myself, if L is innocent, I will hop on my own bandwagon. And unlike L, every time he pulls this move, I mean it. *** I'm more than happy to answer more questions. | ||
|
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
| ||
|
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
On March 26 2010 13:04 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: You know, i'm curious about several players being mafia or not, but that doesn't mean i'm about to nuke them to sate my curiosity. I'm starting to think this is just some personal vendetta Note reason #1. Also—I mean—I offered to be nice to L and treat him like an adult, and he chose different path. So yes, about half of it was because he was getting on my nerves. Amendment to the post above. Third reason: As I've said multiple times throughout the thread, when L is posting, important town discussions literally get shut down, and L moved the discussion to whatever inane thing he thinks is important. L really doesn't help the town much at all. Also, about my pledge to vote for myself, if L flips green, I'll vote for myself as soon as possible. If the votes don't exist, then I'll move my vote, but I think it's more sincere if I kick off my own bandwagon. | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
The kid nuked me because I was honest about not having any nukes and he realized I completely eviscerated his arguments. Given my propensity for driving busses, he figured he'd have died tomorrow regardless and took his shot now. A complete joke of a player. Someone with a nuke should hit him right now, and someone with an anti-nuke should save me. | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
On March 26 2010 13:11 tree.hugger wrote: Note reason #1. Also—I mean—I offered to be nice to L and treat him like an adult, and he chose different path. So yes, about half of it was because he was getting on my nerves. Amendment to the post above. Third reason: As I've said multiple times throughout the thread, when L is posting, important town discussions literally get shut down, and L moved the discussion to whatever inane thing he thinks is important. L really doesn't help the town much at all. Also, about my pledge to vote for myself, if L flips green, I'll vote for myself as soon as possible. If the votes don't exist, then I'll move my vote, but I think it's more sincere if I kick off my own bandwagon. 1)You can't talk about something else? 2)You were trying to treat me like an adult while throwing insults out literally every line, calling my posts spam, redundant, calling me a kid, etc? I specifically relegated all of my bile towards you into a small TL;DR section so that my arguments would be direct and objective. Your pledge is similarly redundant in the REAL sense of the word; the town's response to rogue nukes is to kill the person nuking. You should be nuked immediately. | ||
|
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
On March 26 2010 13:12 L wrote: Starting? The kid nuked me because I was honest about not having any nukes and he realized I completely eviscerated his arguments. Given my propensity for driving busses, he figured he'd have died tomorrow regardless and took his shot now. A complete joke of a player. Someone with a nuke should hit him right now, and someone with an anti-nuke should save me. Your ego knows no bounds does it? Ever considered a job writing cheap crime thrillers? | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
On March 26 2010 13:17 tree.hugger wrote: Your ego knows no bounds does it? Ever considered a job writing cheap crime thrillers? What ego? Nuking nukers was the plan that was agreed upon and that we were going to move on before someone saved caller and had RoL's nuke delay stopped. What's the point of this post other than to piss me off? You argue against vague replies earlier, yet this isn't the only one you make against me. I'm going to 100% ignore posts from you from this point forward unless you actually deal with one of the central points in my arguments against you (and that's highly unlikely given how poor your analysis and self-justification has been thusfar). Our back and forth is becoming thread clogging. | ||
|
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
On March 26 2010 13:21 L wrote: What ego? Nuking nukers was the plan that was agreed upon and that we were going to move on before someone saved caller and had RoL's nuke delay stopped. What's the point of this post other than to piss me off? You argue against vague replies earlier, yet this isn't the only one you make against me. I'm going to 100% ignore posts from you from this point forward unless you actually deal with one of the central points in my arguments against you (and that's highly unlikely given how poor your analysis and self-justification has been thusfar). Our back and forth is becoming thread clogging. Ah, you beat me to the high road. I agree, it's pretty clear we're talking past each other. We'll see what happens. As you were, thread! | ||
|
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
god i thought having lynched RoL, we would prevent the stupidity of people like tree.hugger. i don't understand >.< guys. say no to nukes. have we all forgotten about ToD? this is the crucial difference between this game and the previous everyone-has-a-gun game. i was expecting one triggerhappy idiot, but after getting lynched so hard i figured nobody else would step up to the plate. yes it's great that you provide your reasoning for nuking but DO SO BEFORE YOU NUKE. and if a sizable amount of people agree with you, proceed. sure it's a little bit of a hassle but it prevents shit like this at this rate the game might be over day 1 and nobody wins. or some 3rd party laughs their ass off. don't you guys see this? stop fucking nuking people. i'll go to sleep and post back in about 9-10 hours when i get to work. L, you are planning to extend the day further? it is good to have more discussion but it also gives more idiots the opportunity to go "hey this fag's a fag! nuke:fag" so keep that in mind when you decide. | ||
| ||
