World at War Mafia - Page 41

Stupid logic through and through. Think I'd really be that obvious, as to make Japan's argument in third person?

I pointed out that there may be very good reasons for the person who fired the anti-nuke to remain under cover, whether they be town aligned or mafia aligned. Therefore, your call for the anti-nuke person to reveal themselves is redundant, ill-conceived, and spam.

On March 26 2010 10:03 ~OpZ~ wrote:



Who cares? Nukes/Anti-nukes are not all that important. What is important are actual roles/lynches/night kills.

Seriously. You're probably going to die tomorrow. Let's face that. Nikon maybe too, but I'm still supporting Nemy or Jspazz, or someone that provides nothing. Abenson built a decent case against Jspazz, but it was brushed off by a "I couldn't make up my mind" when it was more "I was riding every bandwagon to pop up"

-_-
Produce something useful. Post a list of suspects that doesn't include the almost bussed L.
I've stated my suspicions. Nemy will be insanely hard to confirm for town or against town. (I don't know if I was clear on why I'm suspicious of him, but he's always suspicious)

On March 26 2010 10:51 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
lolol fucking Japanese always have to ruin fun.

Viva La Revolucion.

Good luck~

On March 26 2010 10:53 L wrote:
Given your past history, yes.

On March 26 2010 10:53 L wrote: Do you know what redundant and spam mean? Because while you might disagree with the idea and call it ill-conceived, it is in no way either of the other two.

On March 26 2010 10:53 L wrote:
Which leads me to believe that you're trying to play yourself up as a big shot or something without knowing what the words you're typing actually mean. Which is pretty hilarious in and of itself.

On March 26 2010 10:53 L wrote:
If you read prior, you'd know that I didn't see that Japan was mentioned in Ace's post, so I already DID retract the statements above. Your defense, however, ignoring that point and trying to attack me on other grounds for no reason is highly suspect.

On March 26 2010 11:15 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
##Nuke: JohnnySpazz

My power is limited, and I didn't realize my power was supposed to post in the thread.

On March 26 2010 11:06 tree.hugger wrote:

Open ended, intentionally vague arguments are really really persuasive.


Attacking my vocabulary is another great way to gain points. Count it!


I would never play myself up to be a big shot. That's your domain.

I suggested we lynch you on Day 1, as per the normal strategy of lynching inactive players. Beyond this, I was aware of your singular ability to disrupt the functional working of the town. I have already made clear that these were my reasons for voting to lynch you. When you returned, you defended yourself, by lashing out at me - perfectly reasonable. In the meantime, of course, you have succeeded in your perpetual quest to derail the town's efforts and confound everyone involved.

Here's specifically what I object to. Your grandstanding, and pretending that you have any motive for lynching me beyond a defense against my accusations against you. You don't. Admit it.

I'll be voting for you, bar anything unexpected, (like my living to tomorrow, for example) because your disruption of common sense in this game has been pernicious, in actively asking a potentially valuable potential town member to compromise their safety.


When did you retract your argument? You were still advocating it a page ago. But at the very least, it's nice you admitted to being wrong about something.

On March 26 2010 11:15 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
##Nuke: JohnnySpazz

My power is limited, and I didn't realize my power was supposed to post in the thread.

On March 26 2010 11:25 Abenson wrote:
Now the most important matter:
To save or not to save
As you've probably know, I'm all for lynching/killing JSpazz.
The most important part is that we, as a town, should collectively decide whether to save JSpazz or not.

On March 26 2010 11:27 L wrote:

We collectively were pretty cool with Caller dying, so how's this going to be any different :3.

On March 26 2010 11:29 Abenson wrote:


Well I just thought that giving Jspazz a chance to talk could perhaps give us some evidence/information :O

On March 26 2010 11:19 L wrote:

1) Wasn't vague. I looked through your past games. You make substantial errors in reasoning repeatedly.

As for behaviorally:

You played in mafia 16 and 18. You were town in both of these games. You did very, very little posting in both of them. In 16 you seem to have made an effort at posting. Your few posts were fairly large, but included a lot of town building consensus language and you generally looked at issues instead of starting fights. Your posts aren't 100% accurate reasoning, but at least you make an effort. A substantial effort. Even when you disagree with people, maybe one or two posts has potentially inflammatory content.

In 18 you hold off. You make nearly zero content posts and are generally happy to lounge around and do nothing. You're probably one of the top 3 lurkers in that game.

This game you've been incredibly offensive from the start.

I'm not the only one that realizes that trying to off me for 'inactivity' when its a 2 day ban is kinda silly. The idea behind inactivity hits is to get people posting and to try to pre-emptively take out a lurker. Its pretty obvious that I'm not going to say nothing all game long, so why would you hold onto the inactivity logic? Fishball is a ball of rage, so I understand why he's butthurt about me raping his logic last game. Versatile is permanently on a PMS bender and loves to pile the hate on me, so I can understand why she'd be eager to try and thumb her nose at me. For everyone else? They have explaining to do and that vote list comprises a significant mafia pool in my eyes because I'm not mafia.

If i was mafia and saw that I could potentially bus one of the best town players out of the game, would I? LOL FUCK YES I WOULD. THATS WHY I BUS ACE PRETTY MUCH EVERY GAME. Hence why I think mafia are probably somewhat concentrated in that list. Granted that you're on that list, yeah, I'd kill you, because I'd probably want to kill the majority of people on that list.