|
On August 31 2011 08:31 Foolishness wrote:Show nested quote +On August 31 2011 07:41 redFF wrote:
I need to know whether i can play in resurrection or not T.T Just go play in it, the game could use a few more players as it is. Just don't get modkill or break any rules. Qatol appears to be mia, and if he doesn't like me saying this then he can eat me.
Sorry, my life is very very busy right now. I won't be able to get to this stuff until the weekend at the earliest and maybe not even then. Until I have time to actually look at this stuff, feel free to sign up for a game (unless you're looking at a ban which will almost certainly be at least 1 game - like BC - or your situation is complicated - like BM). But if you're modkilled or have problems in this new game, the consequences will be severe.
|
I'll be sure to check myself!
|
United States22154 Posts
Well, since no one is commenting on it, I assume people are done discussing the Personality Mafia bans. Taking care of those on my end
Host/chost votes will count for 2, Ban list moderator votes (Qatol and fw) will count for 2, player votes/people following the game will count for 1. Where people failed to give specific numbers ("between 19 and 100 bans") I took the liberty of just taking the median, unless preference in one direction was expressed
Starting with BC
Votes for 3+ bans (4)
+ Show Spoiler +On August 25 2011 12:02 Incognito wrote:
Personality Mafia Bans
BloodyC0bbler was modkilled for acting way over the top regarding his post restriction after two announcements not to discuss such things. In addition, his attitude in defending his rule breaking in the thread, as well as his attitude towards some of the other players were over the top.
Due to his past ban history, he would be getting a 5 game ban according to the current ban list rules. (He was given one ban for his behavior in XXII, where he provoked Scaramanga to give him the mafia list. He was modkilled in Diplomacy mafia for inactivity, and also got a warning for inactivity in Mini Mafia IV.) I think 5 bans is excessive, but since I'm biased, I'll leave the decision to others. I'm looking in the range of a 3-5 game ban).
Incog's vote counts for 2 On August 27 2011 03:47 flamewheel wrote:
I'm with GMarshal.
I will refrain from giving my opinion on James' situation in depth, though I agree with Incognito on three to five, but for three, not five. FW counts for 2
I am not counting BM's vote as long as he is on the permanent ban list, as I don't believe someone who is banned from the community permanently should have any weight
Votes for 1 game bans (1)
+ Show Spoiler +On August 25 2011 22:54 Palmar wrote:
With all this said, I would like to think that BC is able to let this shit just go, and move on. And I think a 5 game ban is very excessive unless there is something more to it than the frustration seen in the thread and the fact that he got modkilled for rulebreaking.
I'd say a 1 game ban for the rulebreaking is what he should get. It's enough time to cool off and get a clear head for the next game.
Palmar counts for 1
Votes for just warnings (3)
+ Show Spoiler +On August 27 2011 14:31 sandroba wrote:
Well GM asked me to be more especific, so here it goes:
A warning for the following players:
BC, kurumi (you really went over the top with spam this game bro), YM, redFF, VisceraEyes
1 ban for DocH: inactivity is what really ruins mafia games.
Absolutely nothing for Jackal58. I don't even see why this is up for discussion. He made a mild joke. Seriously. A single vote for sandrobaOn August 27 2011 14:38 Barundar wrote:
I agree with sand. It felt like bc was just unlucky enough to be the guy who had to get modkilled to statuette an example, red and ve same. in the scum team we highly suspected curu of sharing forbidden info about his forced claim to sand, they just didnt go ahead and post it in the thread.
So warning for the lot of them maybe with the exception of drh. And another from Barundar On August 28 2011 04:42 Kavdragon wrote:
I would also agree that warnings would seem more prudent.
I'm pretty sure people who want maximum punishment won't be posting in here because they will look like the bad guy or something, but I don't think that it's fair to not get the other side of the argument, so if people are out there that want harsher punishment, would you mind voicing your arguments/PM'ing gmarshal them?
I don't really understand why the punishments discussed so far are as harsh as they are. and one from Kav
The standard punishment would be 5 bans, with the cohost asking for 3-5 and the co-moderator of the banlist requesting 3, everyone else is tending to a warning or a single ban. In the interest of fairness it seems to me like the best compromise would be to give BC a two game ban, (less than the suggested 3-5, but more than just a warning), so unless I'm overruled or anyone has any major objections I think that is what we are going to go with.
2 game ban for BC for breaking the rules about not discussing post restrictions
The general sentiment towards jackal58 seems to be no punishment, (not that many people commented on him specifically, but those that did said they didn't want any punishment), so once again, unless someone has a strenuous objection, I think we are going to go with no punishment
Nothing at all for jackal58
|
United States22154 Posts
Qatol is exceedingly busy, so I'll handle the rest of the bans so we can move on.
Same guidelines apply as above. I'll only do vote-counts for controversial or heavily disputed bans, those with clear majorities or with no dissent I'll just give the majority ruling. If anyone feels like I misrepresented a situation please post and explain where, and I'll happily assemble a votecount.
So, taking them in order
On August 25 2011 12:02 Incognito wrote:
~OpZ~ was modkilled, but gave a reasonable excuse, so I'm not going to ask for a ban for him.
Everyone seemed to be ok with this, and no one pointed out that they wanted a warning or a ban for him, so nothing for ~OpZ~
On August 25 2011 12:02 Incognito wrote:
DoctorHelvetica asked to be replaced after the game started without giving a reason or warning before hand. I think this deserves a 1 game ban.
This one is a little more tricky, so, a vote tally (oh boy, this is *exciting*! :-P)
One game ban (3)
+ Show Spoiler +Cohost On August 27 2011 14:31 sandroba wrote:
1 ban for DocH: inactivity is what really ruins mafia games.
No ban (1)
+ Show Spoiler +On August 25 2011 14:30 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
I will give my opinion on a few of the bans. I am fine with how you handled OpZ, DrH is kind of giving warning by asking to be subbed out, we can simply ask for his reason but I don't think asking to be subbed out deserves a ban.
Those are the only posts really addressing Dr.H directly, if someone feels like I missed their opinion please point it out. 3 to 1, and no real argument against it, I think a one game ban for joining a game with no intent to play is what a majority wants.
On August 25 2011 12:02 Incognito wrote:
irc conversation between redFF and VisceraEyesShow nested quote +[12:44am] coquelicotFF:
why did u claim ot me
[12:44am] VisceraEyes:
Cause I couldn't help but notice ur town
[12:45am] coquelicotFF:
is taht a post restriction lol
[12:45am] VisceraEyes:
No
[12:45am] coquelicotFF:
well
[12:45am] VisceraEyes:
But claiming medic is.
[12:45am] coquelicotFF:
erm
[12:45am] VisceraEyes:
Don't tell anyone I told you tho Even after two announcements about not discussing post restrictions, this happens. Furthermore, in the context of the whole irc log (which is too long for me to post here), basically redFF posted the log in order to get around VE's post restriction that didn't allow him to claim medic in the thread. So not only did they knowingly break the rules about not discussing post restrictions, but they were actively trying to get around it. I propose a 1 game ban for redFF and 2 for VE (would be 3 considering his previous ban list history, but he seemed not to want to go along with redFF's plan of posting the irc log in the thread).
People wanting a 1 game ban for redFF and 2 for VE (4)
+ Show Spoiler +Incognito On August 25 2011 14:30 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
I am fine with your take on the Redff/VisceraEyes. On August 25 2011 22:54 Palmar wrote:
Bottom line:
I think cheating, modkills, rulebreaking should always be punished.
( I'm interpreting that as supporting incog's stance)
1 ban for VE, 1 for redFF (1)
+ Show Spoiler +On August 27 2011 12:28 redFF wrote:
meh.
Yeah i guess we did kinda circumvent/abuse the rules. I think VE should only have a 1 game ban though as we didn't do any of this with malicious intentions or really know we were cheating lol.
A warning for both(3)
+ Show Spoiler +On August 27 2011 14:31 sandroba wrote:
A warning for the following players:
BC, kurumi (you really went over the top with spam this game bro), YM, redFF, VisceraEyes
On August 27 2011 14:38 Barundar wrote:
I agree with sand. It felt like bc was just unlucky enough to be the guy who had to get modkilled to statuette an example, red and ve same. On August 28 2011 04:42 Kavdragon wrote:
I would also agree that warnings would seem more prudent.
I don't really understand why the punishments discussed so far are as harsh as they are.
Because the cohost has more weight than the players playing in the game, and the people defending each side seem about even, I'm going to have to go for a one game ban for both VE and RedFF, VE is dropped to only one because of all the people who only wanted a warning, so,
one game ban for each redFF and VE.
On August 25 2011 12:02 Incognito wrote:
Show nested quote +On August 23 2011 07:50 youngminii wrote:
Basically..
"You have been banned! This means that you permanently lose all your bonus powers, and can no longer dodge a lynch. You have also lost your extra night life."
Might as well reveal it. Youngminii. Explicitly breaking the rules forbidding posting PMs from the host. In addition, he was involved in the flamewar with BC. YM has a history of 1 game ban. I propose a 1 game ban.
Youngminii agrees with his ban, and while there were some people requesting a warning instead the majority seems to want a ban, so 1 game ban for posting a PM from a host for youngminii
On August 25 2011 12:02 Incognito wrote:
Kurumi gets a warning, for continuing to spam after a general announcement and a little bit after explicit private warning. The only reason why its not a ban is that his personality was Bill Murray, so some level of spam is to be expected. After two warnings though, it definitely should have stopped.
No one really contested this one at all, so by clear majority, kurumi gets a warning for excessive spaming
And that's the lot of them, if anyone has any problem with how I adjudicated the situation then please shoot me a PM or post in the thread expressing your concerns.
|
Nice work GM.
I think your conclusions are pretty fair, thanks for clearing this up.
|
yay now on to more pressing issues!
|
2 games for BC is both fair and appropriate. He is a part of the foundation of the mafia community here, and is both a great host and player.
|
United States22154 Posts
If anyone wants... context about BM, I suggest you start reading here till page 28, and this for like 3 pages, keeping in mind that gryffindor is BM.
Just some background for those who aren't up to speed.
edit: actually you can go all the way back here
|
Just a note: GMarshal had my permission to make that earlier post on handling the bans I was going to deal with. However, if you are unsatisfied with his decision or just would rather me handle it, please let me know and I'll deal with it when my schedule clears up.
|
On September 02 2011 10:46 Qatol wrote:
Just a note: GMarshal had my permission to make that earlier post on handling the bans I was going to deal with. However, if you are unsatisfied with his decision or just would rather me handle it, please let me know and I'll deal with it when my schedule clears up.
BITCH, MAYBE I PREFER THE MARSHAL. EVER THINK ABOUT THAT?
|
Zorkmid was just temp banned for 1 week by Nyovne.
That account was created on 2008-11-24 08:36:40 and had 1345 posts.
Reason: What the hell is your problem dude. You get warnings upon warnings and bans upon bans but you seem to be utterly and totally incapable or indifferent to even show the slightest bit of self control and manners when expressing yourself about other people. It's depressing.
Poor old Zorkmid...have troubles even outside MafiaLand
|
erm if i /sitout ace's game i cant /in a game until it finishes right? thems the rules?
|
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
Yeah the internet isn't the kindest place.
|
On September 02 2011 13:57 redFF wrote:
erm if i /sitout ace's game i cant /in a game until it finishes right? thems the rules?
Correct. Also, you cannot already be in too many games (you have to be eligible to play in Ace's game in the first place).
|
im in resurrection but thats just a mini so im fine. /sitout ace's game then.
|
Hello guys,
I got myself modkilled and banned during forum mafia XL I believe, because I had exams and other stuff. But I want to participate in future forum mafias on TL, so can you please un-ban me or make my account sit-out the required games (I'm not really sure how that works).
Thanks.
|
On September 05 2011 02:02 monsterDrakar wrote:
Hello guys,
I got myself modkilled and banned during forum mafia XL I believe, because I had exams and other stuff. But I want to participate in future forum mafias on TL, so can you please un-ban me or make my account sit-out the required games (I'm not really sure how that works).
Thanks.
You have 1 game ban as I see. You just type /sitout in a game You'd like to sitout, when the game's over Your ban has ended and You can join games.
|
On September 05 2011 02:02 monsterDrakar wrote:
Hello guys,
I got myself modkilled and banned during forum mafia XL I believe, because I had exams and other stuff. But I want to participate in future forum mafias on TL, so can you please un-ban me or make my account sit-out the required games (I'm not really sure how that works).
Thanks.
basically what Kurumi said. /sitout the next game (Ace's will work i think), and pm Qatol informing him that you're sitting out.
Once the game that you're sitting out is over you will be off the banlist and may play again.
|
United States22154 Posts
Bans for VisceraEyes and Lucidity for being modkilled for inactivity in XLIV. Navilus is spared a ban as he just forgot to post his vote in the voting thread.
EDIT: Apparently Lucidity *did* post in the thread and ALSO forgot to vote in the voting thread, I suppose I can rescind the ban there. VE however lacks an excuse -__-
|
I don't even really want to talk about the gryffindor situation, GMarshal. That was very unjust in my eyes, and I will not be able to be anything but biased. The only thing I regret doing at all there is continuing posting at all.
RoL has said to me he "wouldn't have sought strict punishment in the ban thread", but that just shows the difference in mindsets here. I knew I was going to be permanently banned if it stuck, so I attempted to make it not stick. I felt I had a pretty good case based upon how frequently I was badgered that game, through my words and actions not intending to start fights... even going so far as to ask Jackal to take a breather and walk away from the thread (perhaps I should have taken my own advice!), and the inactivity of the host, RoL himself. If you'll notice, many of the dayposts from the most recent game in question from which I was banned were done by the backup mod. I had been consulting with said backup mod, had been told to calm down, and had actually quit posting completely. Right before I'm about to get off of here, though, I see RoL reveal my identity, and place upon me my 3rd ban. Nothing was done to Jackal... Oh well, like I said, I don't even want to talk about that game... biased opinion
I'm going to have a meal with my GF, then go to bed, and I will respond in the morning
peace out
and if you think I'm being a dick to RoL here is the beginning of his last pm to me
"
[quote]Original Message From RebirthOfLeGenD:
I will be completely straight with you right now. You are a dick."
He goes into about 6 paragraphs culminating in "I doubt you'll be able to play here, and you really need to change your life around"
and he doesn't even know me, does he?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
