On April 09 2017 05:57 eagle wrote: i mean DARTH METEOS is clearly better at tank jungler i mean Zac and Elise but i think inori better at like Rengar and Khazix
Then they pick Iven a supporty farmy kind of jungler.
I'm watching on lolesports and noticed that you can't check runes, masteries and ability order after clicking champion portraits on the right anymore. Should I blame riot or my browser?
On April 10 2017 05:49 Numy wrote: Shame that IMT couldn't get it together fast enough to make it to playoffs. Seeing FQ in it instead if a bit frustrating.
CLG isn't exactly impressing me. Makes me wonder if either of these teams could've taken down Dignitas, but instead Dig had to face the far more formidable P1.
On April 10 2017 05:49 Numy wrote: Shame that IMT couldn't get it together fast enough to make it to playoffs. Seeing FQ in it instead if a bit frustrating.
CLG isn't exactly impressing me. Makes me wonder if either of these teams could've taken down Dignitas, but instead Dig had to face the far more formidable P1.
The playoffs across both regions has just been pretty shit one sided games constantly. Very rarely get anything competitive even if the series is competitive.
Moon and Stixxay still playing pretty dam solid though. I feel like if you combine these two teams, you could get something pretty strong coming out.
On April 10 2017 05:49 Numy wrote: Shame that IMT couldn't get it together fast enough to make it to playoffs. Seeing FQ in it instead if a bit frustrating.
CLG isn't exactly impressing me. Makes me wonder if either of these teams could've taken down Dignitas, but instead Dig had to face the far more formidable P1.
The playoffs across both regions has just been pretty shit one sided games constantly. Very rarely get anything competitive even if the series is competitive.
Moon and Stixxay still playing pretty dam solid though. I feel like if you combine these two teams, you could get something pretty strong coming out.
Hai and Moon to CLG and the rest of CLG is the same?
On April 10 2017 05:49 Numy wrote: Shame that IMT couldn't get it together fast enough to make it to playoffs. Seeing FQ in it instead if a bit frustrating.
CLG isn't exactly impressing me. Makes me wonder if either of these teams could've taken down Dignitas, but instead Dig had to face the far more formidable P1.
The playoffs across both regions has just been pretty shit one sided games constantly. Very rarely get anything competitive even if the series is competitive.
Moon and Stixxay still playing pretty dam solid though. I feel like if you combine these two teams, you could get something pretty strong coming out.
Hai and Moon to CLG and the rest of CLG is the same?
Prob expect get rid of Balls and Darshan. They are both really not good enough.
On April 10 2017 05:23 dsyxelic wrote: lol from the huhi asol to now the huhi ahri
the difference is staggering
He didn't really have that bad of a game, his Aurelion Sol is just strangely really fucking good.
his ahri mechanics were really bad
it was clear he wasnt very comfortable on the champ. though I agree in the grand scheme of things he played at a passable level but I saw so many opportunities huhi could've exploited had he been a better ahri player.
On April 10 2017 08:49 Gahlo wrote: Power of friendship acquires more vacation time.
If they make it through the break, no way this roster doesn't have changes at the end of the year.
Still surprised this roster didn't change at the start of the year. Anyway both of these teams looked very mediocre. Really sad we didn't see Dig/IMT here instead.
On April 10 2017 08:53 Ansibled wrote: Holy shit Zion uninstall the game.
Both teams looked thoroughly mediocre. They were just playing passively, waiting for the other team to throw, and Darshan took the initiative because that's how good teams play right? Except his play was bad, and his team wasn't on the same page. What a depressing end to the series, with the team that plays passively for longer being rewarded with the win.
On April 10 2017 08:58 dsyxelic wrote: honestly not surprised zion was the one to throw
he's done several of these already
zion would have been better than this darshan guy :^)
Watching Post League Time after the fact is hilarious. "Darshan is the most improved, he's so much better than earlier in the season when he was inting." Scarra cursed him! And all of CLG.
Does it feel like CLG is always aiming for mediocrity? There's no risk taking to find a star or anything like that. Just that team that will always be sorta good but not great.
Like I dont' think xmithie, darshan, or huhi (except for when he's on asol) can take over a game. They get recognition for being solid and playing solid, but you'd never image them 1v5 outplaying the enemy team. And that's really worrying that you can't play around your sololaner or get a game where your jungle just gives you a huge earlygame lead.
And its compounded by the fact that adc and support are the worst roles to try and carry a game from. The dual lane just doesn't have the freedom to affect the map.
Honestly, I feel like they gave up after Doublelift left. Stixxay and Huhi were moved from a sub to the main roster and they were able to get by with success in the spring/MSI due to Yellowstar being washed up. Their results have slowly decayed and the only reason they made it to Worlds was because of the massive point load up they got from winning Spring was aided by TSM winning Summer.
If they made it to Semi's and had a shot for 3rd in playoffs I'd say that maybe the org is trying to keep the band together to hit Worlds one last time before calling it quits, but after what happened against Flyquest... that team's in need of a tear down. It needs sololaners bad.
I don't think Stixxay is that bad, and Huhi played better in the series than I'm used to seeing. But Darshan made some pretty bad plays, I didn't like his Fizz in the third game, it's a pick that requires good decision making because it's risky playing without Flash and Fizz can be pretty useless when behind (he killed Balls solo but Rumble will still be useful in team fights).
that team's in need of a tear down. It needs sololaners bad.
Agreed, Darshan needs to go, and if they find a suitable replacement for Huhi, then do it. Only problem I see is that picking up rookies means CLG will be even more passive than before, who shotcalls for them anyway?
As for CLG aiming for mediocrity... they have their ups and downs. They've had to fight for their lives twice in the promotion tournament- but they've also been NA champions twice, one of only three teams to ever achieve that.
I feel CLG has improved dramatically from where they were back in seasons 3 & 4, the team feels cohesive nowadays instead of being in a state of perpetually breaking down in the middle of the split. Sure, they look underwhelming now because they're in a downswing from the lofty heights of their back-to-back championships in S5 Summer and S6 Spring, but NA has also gotten a lot more competitive with time.
Their loss to Flyquest is kind of pathetic, I won't argue that. But CLG isn't a team aiming to win international competitions. TSM aims to win Worlds- sure, they inevitably get completely run over at Worlds when they get there, but at least they're reaching for the sky, and are not content just to do well in NA. CLG, on the other hand, seems perfectly content with making playoffs in NA. I wouldn't expect more from them, because they aren't looking to be more than that.
That was such a weird game. Nothing happens for 25 minutes then C9 gets a small advantage and game is over 5 minutes later. Contractz is playing like a beast so far.
I'd be very surprised if P1 ends up winning this series, after going 0-2 vs. TSM & C9 in week 9.
Off-topic: Is it just me who finds Arrow to be kind of overrated? He's a good ADC to be sure, one of the best in the NA LCS, but all the credit he gets as far and away the best ADC in the region and one of the foremost candidates for Spring Split MVP seems completely unwarranted to me.
P1 is so weird. Stunt plays a bunch and in series before this. Now he's not playing. Meteos comes in does a great job, now it's just Inori every game. What the hell is going on.
arrow only feels overrated because markz/scarra go crazy about him on their shows which just happen to be the most popular shows right now for league
trickles down to reddit as well
he's an excellent player and best ADC NA currently but he's not s3 bjergsen relative to their league at the time
On April 16 2017 05:17 Numy wrote: P1 is so weird. Stunt plays a bunch and in series before this. Now he's not playing. Meteos comes in does a great job, now it's just Inori every game. What the hell is going on.
dunno but only reason I'm hesitant on judging them for it is because their drafts have been great so im assuming the coach is competent
P1 looks real bad. C9 is looking ok. Contractz is still an absolute beast. Looks like another season of LCS with only 2 real teams in the whole league.
edit: Now P1 changes almost half their team mid series. This team is so random.
edit2: yea this is easy 3-0. Rather sad P1 putting up essentially no resistance whole series. Don't know what this team is thinking with drafts/roster/play. If they manage to turn this around it'll be a dam miracle.
On April 16 2017 05:58 Numy wrote: P1 looks real bad. C9 is looking ok. Contractz is still an absolute beast. Looks like another season of LCS with only 2 real teams in the whole league.
edit: Now P1 changes almost half their team mid series. This team is so random.
edit2: yea this is easy 3-0. Rather sad P1 putting up essentially no resistance whole series. Don't know what this team is thinking with drafts/roster/play. If they manage to turn this around it'll be a dam miracle.
Welp, looks like Inori + Shady vs. Meteos + Stunt makes no difference, C9 stomps them either way.
On April 16 2017 06:50 Numy wrote: It's more just anything stable. Constantly changing around series after series sounds like a really bad way to build a solid team.
Man this series was a complete stomp. G2 vs Fnatic was close compared to this. Is NA LCS just going to be 2 real teams and 8 inters forever?
This feels a little unfair to P1 to me. Yes, they got smashed in week 9 by both TSM and C9, then proceeded to get smashed even harder by C9 in Playoffs.
At the same time, TSM, C9 and P1 all looked shaky at one time or another during the split, and while now C9 and TSM are clearly a tier above them, this wasn't the case throughout the regular split. P1 were legitimate contenders for a top-2 finish all the way up to the final week of the regular split, and I for one favored them over C9 leading up to that 9th-week showdown (C9 went 2-2 over the previous 2 weeks, compared to P1's 4-0). P1 had lost their 1st series vs. TSM, but they'd won vs. C9 in week 5.
The race for the top honestly looked like a 3-horse race to me, until P1 decided to fall into a slump at the worst possible time.
On April 16 2017 06:50 Numy wrote: It's more just anything stable. Constantly changing around series after series sounds like a really bad way to build a solid team.
Man this series was a complete stomp. G2 vs Fnatic was close compared to this. Is NA LCS just going to be 2 real teams and 8 inters forever?
This feels a little unfair to P1 to me. Yes, they got smashed in week 9 by both TSM and C9, then proceeded to get smashed even harder by C9 in Playoffs.
At the same time, TSM, C9 and P1 all looked shaky at one time or another during the split, and while now C9 and TSM are clearly a tier above them, this wasn't the case throughout the regular split. P1 were legitimate contenders for a top-2 finish all the way up to the final week of the regular split, and I for one favored them over C9 leading up to that 9th-week showdown (C9 went 2-2 over the previous 2 weeks, compared to P1's 4-0). P1 had lost their 1st series vs. TSM, but they'd won vs. C9 in week 5.
The race for the top honestly looked like a 3-horse race to me, until P1 decided to fall into a slump at the worst possible time.
The issue I have with this is that P1 beat the lower end teams and lost to or at best scraped an even record against the top teams. Then they get slaughtered in playoffs. That's the hallmark of a team at the top of the middle of the pack and not at the very top of the league. Maybe if they manage to pull through next season we can say they in the running for a top team.
Just as a side note you can't just scoff off their "slumping". When it mattered most the team didn't perform. That's a huge negative for them. There seems to be a massive lack of players and teams with BMT in Western league. The few players I can think of are mostly old guard like Soaz. Over the years "league" play seems to have been propped up as so important that this fundamental aspect of competition has kind of faded. Where are the Xpekes, Soazs, Diamonds, Alex Ichs. The guys who when shit hits the fan and all is on the line they step up to perform miracles. That's what made Bengi so freaking scary. The guy could have the worst split ever but you just knew come crunch time when SKT needed him he'd be there to bail them out.
Yeah, Flyquest is perfectly capable of taking a game here if they get a big enough early game lead. TSM are the overwhelming favorites to take the series though.
Not as bad as expected from FLY in game 1. If Altec hit that bunny on bjergson that could have ended differently. Fairly sloppy from both teams but that's not surprising for a FLY game.
I'm expecting a 3-1 TSM win, mainly because Hai's going to go off one game and 1v9.
Game 1's problem for Flyquest was that Altec got behind on CS in lane phase, which stalled his item progression during the pivotal moments in the mid game while Wildturtle hit his 2 item power spike on time and snowballed with it. Him missing a couple key arrows in the mid game fights is also a big problem.
On April 17 2017 05:21 Numy wrote: Have my doubts about FQ managing to get one game unless TSM drops the ball hard.
I don't think TSM will drop any games in playoffs. Cloud9 had close victories against Phoenix1, and I think against an actually decent team C9 will be completely crushed.
On April 17 2017 05:21 Numy wrote: Have my doubts about FQ managing to get one game unless TSM drops the ball hard.
I don't think TSM will drop any games in playoffs. Cloud9 had close victories against Phoenix1, and I think against an actually decent team C9 will be completely crushed.
Honestly disagree with C9 vs P1 being close. C9 just plays a pretty patient game so they didn't crush through lanes in most of the games. P1 never had a chance in any of those games really. C9 had complete control and just crushed them so hard.
So FQ is still pretty sad team. They got really lucky to face the other worst team in playoffs. Obviously any other team besides C9 would just lose anyway but at least they'd put up a bit of a fight. Well I hope they would...
I really don't understand the whole AD Kennen top crap. I guess BotRK is slightly better, but the days of a lane dominant AD Kennen in top lane are looooong over. Might as well go AP if you're gonna sack a lane so you actually do something late game. Specially if you're gonna build tabbi/two dorans/Jaurim's Fist... at what point are you ever going to be a threat?
I don't know who told Balls to stay pushing bot, but if he was there for the Hai shockwave, Flyquest would've turned that around easy.
On April 17 2017 05:59 zer0das wrote: I really don't understand the whole AD Kennen top crap. I guess BotRK is slightly better, but the days of a lane dominant AD Kennen in top lane are looooong over. Might as well go AP if you're gonna sack a lane so you actually do something late game. Specially if you're gonna build tabbi/two dorans/Jaurim's Fist... at what point are you ever going to be a threat?
They want Kennen for split push and the AoE stun option from his ult, as the lack of damage from AP items is made up for the fact that the mid and the ADC usually have AoE skills, or in the case of ADC, go Hurricane.
Personally I say just go BotRK into AP items, mainly Zhonyas and Void Staff. Gives him enough AD for split pushing, but has the AP for the ulti to do more damage, especially when most of the ulti's damage is back-loaded (due to nerfs previously to stop support Kennen from being a thing).
On April 17 2017 05:59 zer0das wrote: I really don't understand the whole AD Kennen top crap. I guess BotRK is slightly better, but the days of a lane dominant AD Kennen in top lane are looooong over. Might as well go AP if you're gonna sack a lane so you actually do something late game. Specially if you're gonna build tabbi/two dorans/Jaurim's Fist... at what point are you ever going to be a threat?
No one understands it man. It just seems terrible.
lol @ balls flashing in with ulti with everyone on TSM being low hp into doing fuck all. AD kennen is just useless.
I think TSM will 3-0 as well but it's not that clean. FLY had some opportunities in both games so far. If TSM finish up it should be an interesting series versus c9. I actually feel like c9 won more easily versus p1 then TSM is versus FLY at the moment. I'd probably still favor TSM though based on the second half of the season.
On April 17 2017 06:11 Kyo Yuy wrote: I can't see FlyQuest coming back from this, TSM looking like the better team in all aspects.
Well, we'll find out if NA LCS really is a scripted Anime now. We can have confirmation If Flyquest reverse sweeps TSM and Doublelift ends back up in TL.
FQ baffles me. Why on earth would you pick Mao here. Do they just like going for champs that used to be good but got nerfed into being worse than others?
edit: Man it's crazy how bad the early games of both NA and EUs best teams are.
On April 17 2017 05:59 zer0das wrote: I really don't understand the whole AD Kennen top crap. I guess BotRK is slightly better, but the days of a lane dominant AD Kennen in top lane are looooong over. Might as well go AP if you're gonna sack a lane so you actually do something late game. Specially if you're gonna build tabbi/two dorans/Jaurim's Fist... at what point are you ever going to be a threat?
You can't really have the same impact late game if you go AP, since they somewhat back loaded the damage on his ult so you can't just run in and blow things up the same way anymore..
On April 17 2017 06:08 Kinie wrote:They want Kennen for split push and the AoE stun option from his ult, as the lack of damage from AP items is made up for the fact that the mid and the ADC usually have AoE skills, or in the case of ADC, go Hurricane.
Personally I say just go BotRK into AP items, mainly Zhonyas and Void Staff. Gives him enough AD for split pushing, but has the AP for the ulti to do more damage, especially when most of the ulti's damage is back-loaded (due to nerfs previously to stop support Kennen from being a thing).
Here's the problem: you're expecting Altec to do something. Also, TP takes forever to channel these days, you're not split pushing and getting a good flank nearly as easily as you used to be able to. You're probably sitting on fountain so you have the speed buff. How much time do people actually get split pushing these days? To the point where it results in kill, turrets getting taken, the game turning off of it? Very few. And you're not doing it with a mediocre split pusher like Kennen.
On April 17 2017 06:30 Numy wrote: FQ baffles me. Why on earth would you pick Mao here. Do they just like going for champs that used to be good but got nerfed into being worse than others?
edit: Man it's crazy how bad the early games of both NA and EUs best teams are.
It's hard to have a good early game with WildTurtle on your team
What scrappy games, I guess TSM's plan was to force FQ to play at their pace, and they just went with it. But so many mistakes from TSM, those games were not clean at all. Especially those early Sven invades... The EU games today looked of a far higher quality.
Welp, that went about as expected. The only surprising thing about this series is that Flyquest even managed to make it this far, I'm fully expecting them to get rolled by P1 next week as well.
On April 17 2017 05:59 zer0das wrote: I really don't understand the whole AD Kennen top crap. I guess BotRK is slightly better, but the days of a lane dominant AD Kennen in top lane are looooong over. Might as well go AP if you're gonna sack a lane so you actually do something late game. Specially if you're gonna build tabbi/two dorans/Jaurim's Fist... at what point are you ever going to be a threat?
No one understands it man. It just seems terrible.
lol @ balls flashing in with ulti with everyone on TSM being low hp into doing fuck all. AD kennen is just useless.
Smeb makes it look good. The TLDR of BORK Kennen is you should be 2-3 levels and 50+ CS ahead.
Also. Is Hai the biggest miracle in Esports right now? 2 years ago I was (and I think everyone was) saying, "Its a shame that he's the best shotcaller in the west, but doesn't have the mechanics for his team to be competitive." Now he seems perfectly capable of stalling midlane with elite shotcalling, and I'm saying, "Its really a shame Hai's sidlanes are such shit they lose even with significant gank advantages."
I must say it is pretty impressive how TSM and even more so SKT stay so strong all this time.
TSM pre Bjergsen had pretty stacked in region rosters and Bjerg era TSM and SKT have had the best player in the region at the most impactful position in the game. So I don't know how impressive that really is.
I must say it is pretty impressive how TSM and even more so SKT stay so strong all this time.
TSM pre Bjergsen had pretty stacked in region rosters and Bjerg era TSM and SKT have had the best player in the region at the most impactful position in the game. So I don't know how impressive that really is.
It's true that Bjerg is a beast and Faker is even more of an animal. Extremely talented people. However it has been shown that without every cog working, and not just the star, that it is very easy to fall and fall hard. Even TSM and SKT have had their moments. However, they got past it and TSM has been in every NA final and SKT have won Worlds 3 times. The impressive part is the fact that they are consistent when more teams are becoming stronger and stronger in a game where one chink in your armor will send you spiraling down if not vanishing outright.
I must say it is pretty impressive how TSM and even more so SKT stay so strong all this time.
TSM pre Bjergsen had pretty stacked in region rosters and Bjerg era TSM and SKT have had the best player in the region at the most impactful position in the game. So I don't know how impressive that really is.
It's true that Bjerg is a beast and Faker is even more of an animal. Extremely talented people. However it has been shown that without every cog working, and not just the star, that it is very easy to fall and fall hard. Even TSM and SKT have had their moments. However, they got past it and TSM has been in every NA final and SKT have won Worlds 3 times. The impressive part is the fact that they are consistent when more teams are becoming stronger and stronger in a game where one chink in your armor will send you spiraling down if not vanishing outright.
TSMs consistency really is amazing but I think it's a bit disingenuous to say other teams have become stronger. NA has been largely a two horse race for the entirety of the scenes existence with merely who were the two horses changing at certain times. The fact that TSM has basically always been one of the two is incredible.
Do wonder if the weakness of the rest of the teams is partly to blame for lack of any kind of international success. When you're always at the top uncontested mostly it must be hard to truly get to the next level. You need that running buddy pushing you forward to new heights. SKT has always had that force of antagonism. Western League seems to lack that currently.
I must say it is pretty impressive how TSM and even more so SKT stay so strong all this time.
TSM pre Bjergsen had pretty stacked in region rosters and Bjerg era TSM and SKT have had the best player in the region at the most impactful position in the game. So I don't know how impressive that really is.
It's true that Bjerg is a beast and Faker is even more of an animal. Extremely talented people. However it has been shown that without every cog working, and not just the star, that it is very easy to fall and fall hard. Even TSM and SKT have had their moments. However, they got past it and TSM has been in every NA final and SKT have won Worlds 3 times. The impressive part is the fact that they are consistent when more teams are becoming stronger and stronger in a game where one chink in your armor will send you spiraling down if not vanishing outright.
TSMs consistency really is amazing but I think it's a bit disingenuous to say other teams have become stronger. NA has been largely a two horse race for the entirety of the scenes existence with merely who were the two horses changing at certain times. The fact that TSM has basically always been one of the two is incredible.
Do wonder if the weakness of the rest of the teams is partly to blame for lack of any kind of international success. When you're always at the top uncontested mostly it must be hard to truly get to the next level. You need that running buddy pushing you forward to new heights. SKT has always had that force of antagonism. Western League seems to lack that currently.
I can't argue the 2 horse view. You are totally right on that one.
I must say it is pretty impressive how TSM and even more so SKT stay so strong all this time.
TSM pre Bjergsen had pretty stacked in region rosters and Bjerg era TSM and SKT have had the best player in the region at the most impactful position in the game. So I don't know how impressive that really is.
It's true that Bjerg is a beast and Faker is even more of an animal. Extremely talented people. However it has been shown that without every cog working, and not just the star, that it is very easy to fall and fall hard. Even TSM and SKT have had their moments. However, they got past it and TSM has been in every NA final and SKT have won Worlds 3 times. The impressive part is the fact that they are consistent when more teams are becoming stronger and stronger in a game where one chink in your armor will send you spiraling down if not vanishing outright.
TSMs consistency really is amazing but I think it's a bit disingenuous to say other teams have become stronger. NA has been largely a two horse race for the entirety of the scenes existence with merely who were the two horses changing at certain times. The fact that TSM has basically always been one of the two is incredible.
Do wonder if the weakness of the rest of the teams is partly to blame for lack of any kind of international success. When you're always at the top uncontested mostly it must be hard to truly get to the next level. You need that running buddy pushing you forward to new heights. SKT has always had that force of antagonism. Western League seems to lack that currently.
SKT having decent competition is definitely a bonus. I, honestly, still find it extremely disappointing that people don't see that Piglet/Impact being relevant LCS players is a joke. That is the gap. Those guys were the undoing of 2014 SKT, and yet are fairly high tier in NA. Like I said above, people complained about Hai's mechanics holding C9 back in 2015, his mechanics are average in the NALCS now, and Balls & Lemon are starting on the 3rd best team in NA. That is the gap.
I must say it is pretty impressive how TSM and even more so SKT stay so strong all this time.
TSM pre Bjergsen had pretty stacked in region rosters and Bjerg era TSM and SKT have had the best player in the region at the most impactful position in the game. So I don't know how impressive that really is.
It's true that Bjerg is a beast and Faker is even more of an animal. Extremely talented people. However it has been shown that without every cog working, and not just the star, that it is very easy to fall and fall hard. Even TSM and SKT have had their moments. However, they got past it and TSM has been in every NA final and SKT have won Worlds 3 times. The impressive part is the fact that they are consistent when more teams are becoming stronger and stronger in a game where one chink in your armor will send you spiraling down if not vanishing outright.
TSMs consistency really is amazing but I think it's a bit disingenuous to say other teams have become stronger. NA has been largely a two horse race for the entirety of the scenes existence with merely who were the two horses changing at certain times. The fact that TSM has basically always been one of the two is incredible.
Do wonder if the weakness of the rest of the teams is partly to blame for lack of any kind of international success. When you're always at the top uncontested mostly it must be hard to truly get to the next level. You need that running buddy pushing you forward to new heights. SKT has always had that force of antagonism. Western League seems to lack that currently.
SKT having decent competition is definitely a bonus. I, honestly, still find it extremely disappointing that people don't see that Piglet/Impact being relevant LCS players is a joke. That is the gap. Those guys were the undoing of 2014 SKT, and yet are fairly high tier in NA. Like I said above, people complained about Hai's mechanics holding C9 back in 2015, his mechanics are average in the NALCS now, and Balls & Lemon are starting on the 3rd best team in NA. That is the gap.
Were fairly high tier in the case of Piglet. No way in hell Flyquest is the 3rd best team.
what's so bad about Impact being good in NA? He's not as good as the elite korean tops in LCK but he's certainly right below them so its not bad.
like we know ssumday (and others outside of NA) is individually better but impact has transitioned nicely
impact could still play in the LCK and be probably an average top or at least a serviceable one.
piglet's stock has dropped heavily. the only time he was the 'top' of NA LCS was in s6 spring when he was easily top 2 ADC NA. which is not too surprising considering the meta then. piglet's streaky patch player. on a good run he is a world class ADC and the other times he is barely average to below average.
NA players aren't the joke, it's the NA system.
in the case of ssumday: he's clearly individually the best top laner in the NA LCS but outside of the korean system he is near helpless besides the rare 1v9. the only one that seems to have some hope is TSM but even they have their many flaws.
now if TSM and TL combined with steve doing only the business side ($$$) and regi doing everything else, I could maybe see a team that's consistently worlds bracket stage tier but other than that lol
I must say it is pretty impressive how TSM and even more so SKT stay so strong all this time.
TSM pre Bjergsen had pretty stacked in region rosters and Bjerg era TSM and SKT have had the best player in the region at the most impactful position in the game. So I don't know how impressive that really is.
It's true that Bjerg is a beast and Faker is even more of an animal. Extremely talented people. However it has been shown that without every cog working, and not just the star, that it is very easy to fall and fall hard. Even TSM and SKT have had their moments. However, they got past it and TSM has been in every NA final and SKT have won Worlds 3 times. The impressive part is the fact that they are consistent when more teams are becoming stronger and stronger in a game where one chink in your armor will send you spiraling down if not vanishing outright.
TSMs consistency really is amazing but I think it's a bit disingenuous to say other teams have become stronger. NA has been largely a two horse race for the entirety of the scenes existence with merely who were the two horses changing at certain times. The fact that TSM has basically always been one of the two is incredible.
Do wonder if the weakness of the rest of the teams is partly to blame for lack of any kind of international success. When you're always at the top uncontested mostly it must be hard to truly get to the next level. You need that running buddy pushing you forward to new heights. SKT has always had that force of antagonism. Western League seems to lack that currently.
SKT having decent competition is definitely a bonus. I, honestly, still find it extremely disappointing that people don't see that Piglet/Impact being relevant LCS players is a joke. That is the gap. Those guys were the undoing of 2014 SKT, and yet are fairly high tier in NA. Like I said above, people complained about Hai's mechanics holding C9 back in 2015, his mechanics are average in the NALCS now, and Balls & Lemon are starting on the 3rd best team in NA. That is the gap.
Were fairly high tier in the case of Piglet. No way in hell Flyquest is the 3rd best team.
1. Impact was the best toplaner in the LCS for a while. So IDK wtf you are talking about.
2. Fly placed 3rd, will finish 3/4, and its not like CLG would be favored against them...
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: what's so bad about Impact being good in NA? He's not as good as the elite korean tops in LCK but he's certainly right below them so its not bad.
Its, basically, part 1 of "the gap".
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: like we know ssumday (and others outside of NA) is individually better but impact has transitioned nicely
That is bad.
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: impact could still play in the LCK and be probably an average top or at least a serviceable one.
Serviceable for a team no decent NA team will ever face internationally.
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: piglet's stock has dropped heavily. the only time he was the 'top' of NA LCS was in s6 spring when he was easily top 2 ADC NA. which is not too surprising considering the meta then. piglet's streaky patch player. on a good run he is a world class ADC and the other times he is barely average to below average.
Its embarrassing he was ever the top of NA LCS
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: NA players aren't the joke, it's the NA system.
in the case of ssumday: he's clearly individually the best top laner in the NA LCS but outside of the korean system he is near helpless besides the rare 1v9. the only one that seems to have some hope is TSM but even they have their many flaws.
Clearly we have demonstrated that it is both.
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: now if TSM and TL combined with steve doing only the business side ($$$) and regi doing everything else, I could maybe see a team that's consistently worlds bracket stage tier but other than that lol
Regi appears to outclass Steve at all relevant skills so IDK what the point of the merger is.
On April 18 2017 07:04 cLutZ wrote: Catastrophe of multiquoting.
What I'm saying is the Impact is still pretty good in NA but Piglet has not been for a while unless the meta fit him perfectly. That is "wtf" I'm talking about.
Flyquest finished 5th, only ahead of DIG because they lost one fewer games. They are going to end up 4th in playoffs because CLG has the accidental choking capability of a toddler.
Piglet was never on the top of NA LCS. Not even close, beating up the bottom tier scrubs doesn't count for anything. You'd think by 2017 people would realize this, but I guess we're still donning the TL googles of Piglet can do no wrong.
On April 18 2017 07:04 cLutZ wrote: Catastrophe of multiquoting.
What I'm saying is the Impact is still pretty good in NA but Piglet has not been for a while unless the meta fit him perfectly. That is "wtf" I'm talking about.
Flyquest finished 5th, only ahead of DIG because they lost one fewer games. They are going to end up 4th in playoffs because CLG has the accidental choking capability of a toddler.
I don't like Piglet either. I have been under the impression that people liked his performances, at least when he first came over. Even when some guy like "Joe" or "Steve" was better.
I must say it is pretty impressive how TSM and even more so SKT stay so strong all this time.
TSM pre Bjergsen had pretty stacked in region rosters and Bjerg era TSM and SKT have had the best player in the region at the most impactful position in the game. So I don't know how impressive that really is.
It's true that Bjerg is a beast and Faker is even more of an animal. Extremely talented people. However it has been shown that without every cog working, and not just the star, that it is very easy to fall and fall hard. Even TSM and SKT have had their moments. However, they got past it and TSM has been in every NA final and SKT have won Worlds 3 times. The impressive part is the fact that they are consistent when more teams are becoming stronger and stronger in a game where one chink in your armor will send you spiraling down if not vanishing outright.
TSMs consistency really is amazing but I think it's a bit disingenuous to say other teams have become stronger. NA has been largely a two horse race for the entirety of the scenes existence with merely who were the two horses changing at certain times. The fact that TSM has basically always been one of the two is incredible.
Do wonder if the weakness of the rest of the teams is partly to blame for lack of any kind of international success. When you're always at the top uncontested mostly it must be hard to truly get to the next level. You need that running buddy pushing you forward to new heights. SKT has always had that force of antagonism. Western League seems to lack that currently.
SKT having decent competition is definitely a bonus. I, honestly, still find it extremely disappointing that people don't see that Piglet/Impact being relevant LCS players is a joke. That is the gap. Those guys were the undoing of 2014 SKT, and yet are fairly high tier in NA. Like I said above, people complained about Hai's mechanics holding C9 back in 2015, his mechanics are average in the NALCS now, and Balls & Lemon are starting on the 3rd best team in NA. That is the gap.
Were fairly high tier in the case of Piglet. No way in hell Flyquest is the 3rd best team.
1. Impact was the best toplaner in the LCS for a while. So IDK wtf you are talking about.
2. Fly placed 3rd, will finish 3/4, and its not like CLG would be favored against them...
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: what's so bad about Impact being good in NA? He's not as good as the elite korean tops in LCK but he's certainly right below them so its not bad.
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: piglet's stock has dropped heavily. the only time he was the 'top' of NA LCS was in s6 spring when he was easily top 2 ADC NA. which is not too surprising considering the meta then. piglet's streaky patch player. on a good run he is a world class ADC and the other times he is barely average to below average.
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: NA players aren't the joke, it's the NA system.
in the case of ssumday: he's clearly individually the best top laner in the NA LCS but outside of the korean system he is near helpless besides the rare 1v9. the only one that seems to have some hope is TSM but even they have their many flaws.
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: now if TSM and TL combined with steve doing only the business side ($$$) and regi doing everything else, I could maybe see a team that's consistently worlds bracket stage tier but other than that lol
Regi appears to outclass Steve at all relevant skills so IDK what the point of the merger is.
why is it bad? what is so wrong about a player from a superior league being good in a lesser league? I don't understand your logic here. it's nothing new to sports or esports.
ok again what is your point? Impact would be average enough in a superior league that he wouldn't face NA teams internationally. what is the problem again?
no cause piglet was actually good then. or at least in the context of the world, 'good enough'.
yes it is both but the bigger problem is the system while you are focusing more on the players for some reason.
disagree. steve seems better at getting sponsorships at deals with a historically mediocre (and lately shit) team. granted it may be he is just spending more time on it, who knows. but you can't dismiss all the money steve has generated.
dunno why you are trying to edgelord here
though honestly not sure if you are just a really distraught NA fan who has just discovered that korea will be far superior than NA for a long time.
Personally, I don't mind the gap even if it means NA will always be the weakest region. Just like in real sports, you're always going to have a few regions dominate any one sport, but other regions will still play the sport. Japan will NEVER have the best basketball or soccer team, but that doesn't mean they should stop competing internationally.
I dislike how people think NA should just not compete internationally just because they suck. Yes we all know Worlds is basically LCK Autumn with random high school level (by comparison) League teams getting dumpstered, but I'd rather have that than let it be like Brood War where there was literally no scene outside of South Korea.
I must say it is pretty impressive how TSM and even more so SKT stay so strong all this time.
TSM pre Bjergsen had pretty stacked in region rosters and Bjerg era TSM and SKT have had the best player in the region at the most impactful position in the game. So I don't know how impressive that really is.
It's true that Bjerg is a beast and Faker is even more of an animal. Extremely talented people. However it has been shown that without every cog working, and not just the star, that it is very easy to fall and fall hard. Even TSM and SKT have had their moments. However, they got past it and TSM has been in every NA final and SKT have won Worlds 3 times. The impressive part is the fact that they are consistent when more teams are becoming stronger and stronger in a game where one chink in your armor will send you spiraling down if not vanishing outright.
TSMs consistency really is amazing but I think it's a bit disingenuous to say other teams have become stronger. NA has been largely a two horse race for the entirety of the scenes existence with merely who were the two horses changing at certain times. The fact that TSM has basically always been one of the two is incredible.
Do wonder if the weakness of the rest of the teams is partly to blame for lack of any kind of international success. When you're always at the top uncontested mostly it must be hard to truly get to the next level. You need that running buddy pushing you forward to new heights. SKT has always had that force of antagonism. Western League seems to lack that currently.
SKT having decent competition is definitely a bonus. I, honestly, still find it extremely disappointing that people don't see that Piglet/Impact being relevant LCS players is a joke. That is the gap. Those guys were the undoing of 2014 SKT, and yet are fairly high tier in NA. Like I said above, people complained about Hai's mechanics holding C9 back in 2015, his mechanics are average in the NALCS now, and Balls & Lemon are starting on the 3rd best team in NA. That is the gap.
Were fairly high tier in the case of Piglet. No way in hell Flyquest is the 3rd best team.
1. Impact was the best toplaner in the LCS for a while. So IDK wtf you are talking about.
2. Fly placed 3rd, will finish 3/4, and its not like CLG would be favored against them...
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: what's so bad about Impact being good in NA? He's not as good as the elite korean tops in LCK but he's certainly right below them so its not bad.
Its, basically, part 1 of "the gap".
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: like we know ssumday (and others outside of NA) is individually better but impact has transitioned nicely
That is bad.
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: impact could still play in the LCK and be probably an average top or at least a serviceable one.
Serviceable for a team no decent NA team will ever face internationally.
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: piglet's stock has dropped heavily. the only time he was the 'top' of NA LCS was in s6 spring when he was easily top 2 ADC NA. which is not too surprising considering the meta then. piglet's streaky patch player. on a good run he is a world class ADC and the other times he is barely average to below average.
Its embarrassing he was ever the top of NA LCS
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: NA players aren't the joke, it's the NA system.
in the case of ssumday: he's clearly individually the best top laner in the NA LCS but outside of the korean system he is near helpless besides the rare 1v9. the only one that seems to have some hope is TSM but even they have their many flaws.
Clearly we have demonstrated that it is both.
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: now if TSM and TL combined with steve doing only the business side ($$$) and regi doing everything else, I could maybe see a team that's consistently worlds bracket stage tier but other than that lol
Regi appears to outclass Steve at all relevant skills so IDK what the point of the merger is.
why is it bad? what is so wrong about a player from a superior league being good in a lesser league? I don't understand your logic here. it's nothing new to sports or esports.
ok again what is your point? Impact would be average enough in a superior league that he wouldn't face NA teams internationally. what is the problem again?
no cause piglet was actually good then. or at least in the context of the world, 'good enough'.
yes it is both but the bigger problem is the system while you are focusing more on the players for some reason.
disagree. steve seems better at getting sponsorships at deals with a historically mediocre (and lately shit) team. granted it may be he is just spending more time on it, who knows. but you can't dismiss all the money steve has generated.
dunno why you are trying to edgelord here
though honestly not sure if you are just a really distraught NA fan who has just discovered that korea will be far superior than NA for a long time.
TL is also one of the most storied Western esports franchises, and they have a site with lots of traffic. TSM is a relative newcomer, and I guess that their site/ etc. doesn't get the volume of traffic the TL properties do. Looking at it from a biz perspective, TL maybe offers more advertising opportunity, plus Steve has just been in the business longer so he knows people and such.
I must say it is pretty impressive how TSM and even more so SKT stay so strong all this time.
TSM pre Bjergsen had pretty stacked in region rosters and Bjerg era TSM and SKT have had the best player in the region at the most impactful position in the game. So I don't know how impressive that really is.
It's true that Bjerg is a beast and Faker is even more of an animal. Extremely talented people. However it has been shown that without every cog working, and not just the star, that it is very easy to fall and fall hard. Even TSM and SKT have had their moments. However, they got past it and TSM has been in every NA final and SKT have won Worlds 3 times. The impressive part is the fact that they are consistent when more teams are becoming stronger and stronger in a game where one chink in your armor will send you spiraling down if not vanishing outright.
TSMs consistency really is amazing but I think it's a bit disingenuous to say other teams have become stronger. NA has been largely a two horse race for the entirety of the scenes existence with merely who were the two horses changing at certain times. The fact that TSM has basically always been one of the two is incredible.
Do wonder if the weakness of the rest of the teams is partly to blame for lack of any kind of international success. When you're always at the top uncontested mostly it must be hard to truly get to the next level. You need that running buddy pushing you forward to new heights. SKT has always had that force of antagonism. Western League seems to lack that currently.
SKT having decent competition is definitely a bonus. I, honestly, still find it extremely disappointing that people don't see that Piglet/Impact being relevant LCS players is a joke. That is the gap. Those guys were the undoing of 2014 SKT, and yet are fairly high tier in NA. Like I said above, people complained about Hai's mechanics holding C9 back in 2015, his mechanics are average in the NALCS now, and Balls & Lemon are starting on the 3rd best team in NA. That is the gap.
Were fairly high tier in the case of Piglet. No way in hell Flyquest is the 3rd best team.
1. Impact was the best toplaner in the LCS for a while. So IDK wtf you are talking about.
2. Fly placed 3rd, will finish 3/4, and its not like CLG would be favored against them...
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: what's so bad about Impact being good in NA? He's not as good as the elite korean tops in LCK but he's certainly right below them so its not bad.
Its, basically, part 1 of "the gap".
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: like we know ssumday (and others outside of NA) is individually better but impact has transitioned nicely
That is bad.
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: impact could still play in the LCK and be probably an average top or at least a serviceable one.
Serviceable for a team no decent NA team will ever face internationally.
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: piglet's stock has dropped heavily. the only time he was the 'top' of NA LCS was in s6 spring when he was easily top 2 ADC NA. which is not too surprising considering the meta then. piglet's streaky patch player. on a good run he is a world class ADC and the other times he is barely average to below average.
Its embarrassing he was ever the top of NA LCS
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: NA players aren't the joke, it's the NA system.
in the case of ssumday: he's clearly individually the best top laner in the NA LCS but outside of the korean system he is near helpless besides the rare 1v9. the only one that seems to have some hope is TSM but even they have their many flaws.
Clearly we have demonstrated that it is both.
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: now if TSM and TL combined with steve doing only the business side ($$$) and regi doing everything else, I could maybe see a team that's consistently worlds bracket stage tier but other than that lol
Regi appears to outclass Steve at all relevant skills so IDK what the point of the merger is.
why is it bad? what is so wrong about a player from a superior league being good in a lesser league? I don't understand your logic here. it's nothing new to sports or esports.
ok again what is your point? Impact would be average enough in a superior league that he wouldn't face NA teams internationally. what is the problem again?
no cause piglet was actually good then. or at least in the context of the world, 'good enough'.
yes it is both but the bigger problem is the system while you are focusing more on the players for some reason.
disagree. steve seems better at getting sponsorships at deals with a historically mediocre (and lately shit) team. granted it may be he is just spending more time on it, who knows. but you can't dismiss all the money steve has generated.
dunno why you are trying to edgelord here
though honestly not sure if you are just a really distraught NA fan who has just discovered that korea will be far superior than NA for a long time.
TL is also one of the most storied Western esports franchises, and they have a site with lots of traffic. TSM is a relative newcomer, and I guess that their site/ etc. doesn't get the volume of traffic the TL properties do. Looking at it from a biz perspective, TL maybe offers more advertising opportunity, plus Steve has just been in the business longer so he knows people and such.
I think you're selling TSM a bit short on that. They have solomid, probuilds, champion.gg, and a few other websites.
I must say it is pretty impressive how TSM and even more so SKT stay so strong all this time.
TSM pre Bjergsen had pretty stacked in region rosters and Bjerg era TSM and SKT have had the best player in the region at the most impactful position in the game. So I don't know how impressive that really is.
It's true that Bjerg is a beast and Faker is even more of an animal. Extremely talented people. However it has been shown that without every cog working, and not just the star, that it is very easy to fall and fall hard. Even TSM and SKT have had their moments. However, they got past it and TSM has been in every NA final and SKT have won Worlds 3 times. The impressive part is the fact that they are consistent when more teams are becoming stronger and stronger in a game where one chink in your armor will send you spiraling down if not vanishing outright.
TSMs consistency really is amazing but I think it's a bit disingenuous to say other teams have become stronger. NA has been largely a two horse race for the entirety of the scenes existence with merely who were the two horses changing at certain times. The fact that TSM has basically always been one of the two is incredible.
Do wonder if the weakness of the rest of the teams is partly to blame for lack of any kind of international success. When you're always at the top uncontested mostly it must be hard to truly get to the next level. You need that running buddy pushing you forward to new heights. SKT has always had that force of antagonism. Western League seems to lack that currently.
SKT having decent competition is definitely a bonus. I, honestly, still find it extremely disappointing that people don't see that Piglet/Impact being relevant LCS players is a joke. That is the gap. Those guys were the undoing of 2014 SKT, and yet are fairly high tier in NA. Like I said above, people complained about Hai's mechanics holding C9 back in 2015, his mechanics are average in the NALCS now, and Balls & Lemon are starting on the 3rd best team in NA. That is the gap.
Were fairly high tier in the case of Piglet. No way in hell Flyquest is the 3rd best team.
1. Impact was the best toplaner in the LCS for a while. So IDK wtf you are talking about.
2. Fly placed 3rd, will finish 3/4, and its not like CLG would be favored against them...
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: what's so bad about Impact being good in NA? He's not as good as the elite korean tops in LCK but he's certainly right below them so its not bad.
Its, basically, part 1 of "the gap".
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: like we know ssumday (and others outside of NA) is individually better but impact has transitioned nicely
That is bad.
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: impact could still play in the LCK and be probably an average top or at least a serviceable one.
Serviceable for a team no decent NA team will ever face internationally.
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: piglet's stock has dropped heavily. the only time he was the 'top' of NA LCS was in s6 spring when he was easily top 2 ADC NA. which is not too surprising considering the meta then. piglet's streaky patch player. on a good run he is a world class ADC and the other times he is barely average to below average.
Its embarrassing he was ever the top of NA LCS
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: NA players aren't the joke, it's the NA system.
in the case of ssumday: he's clearly individually the best top laner in the NA LCS but outside of the korean system he is near helpless besides the rare 1v9. the only one that seems to have some hope is TSM but even they have their many flaws.
Clearly we have demonstrated that it is both.
On April 18 2017 06:32 dsyxelic wrote: now if TSM and TL combined with steve doing only the business side ($$$) and regi doing everything else, I could maybe see a team that's consistently worlds bracket stage tier but other than that lol
Regi appears to outclass Steve at all relevant skills so IDK what the point of the merger is.
why is it bad? what is so wrong about a player from a superior league being good in a lesser league? I don't understand your logic here. it's nothing new to sports or esports.
ok again what is your point? Impact would be average enough in a superior league that he wouldn't face NA teams internationally. what is the problem again?
no cause piglet was actually good then. or at least in the context of the world, 'good enough'.
yes it is both but the bigger problem is the system while you are focusing more on the players for some reason.
disagree. steve seems better at getting sponsorships at deals with a historically mediocre (and lately shit) team. granted it may be he is just spending more time on it, who knows. but you can't dismiss all the money steve has generated.
dunno why you are trying to edgelord here
though honestly not sure if you are just a really distraught NA fan who has just discovered that korea will be far superior than NA for a long time.
TL is also one of the most storied Western esports franchises, and they have a site with lots of traffic. TSM is a relative newcomer, and I guess that their site/ etc. doesn't get the volume of traffic the TL properties do. Looking at it from a biz perspective, TL maybe offers more advertising opportunity, plus Steve has just been in the business longer so he knows people and such.
I think you're selling TSM a bit short on that. They have solomid, probuilds, champion.gg, and a few other websites.
Yes. TSM has tons of traffic. TL's main advantage is their better infrastructure outside of LOL, where I don't think TSM's teams have been all that successful.
TSM has the best Smash 4 player, one of the best Melee players, had one of the best Smite teams, has/had the best Vainglory team, had one of the best CS:GO teams, and has/had big name Hearthstone streamsers(I don't know about the HS competitive scene).
TSM being relevant in CSGO was something they merely bought in and then ceased to exist when they left. Competitive side they don't really seem to be that relevant outside of select individuals in some fighters(When US lets him in :<) and League. Their HS streamers mostly left TSM or don't really do much for TSM HS iirc.
For how big the team is in league and just pure fanbase I'd say it's a failing for the organisation. If you look at Cloud 9 on the other hand it they appear as more of a complete "esports" team than merely a League team with some side operations that TSM feels like.
C9 vs. TSM finals looks really close on paper. The things I'll be watching out for are:
Svenskeren: This guy's been really inconsistent- sometimes he's a beast, other times he feeds. C9 really wants to get an edge in the jungle to make up for their disadvantages in mid and toplane.
C9 Toplane: Impact on a tank sounds like C9's best bet to me. Playing Ray on a carry champion instead could pay off bigtime, but will more likely fall flat against a Hauntzer who can expect support from Bjergsen and Svenskeren.
Wildturtle: Turtle did surprisingly well vs. Flyquest in the semis, but Sneaky + Smoothie is a much scarier botlane than Altec + Lemon, and C9 is a hell of a lot tougher than Flyquest. I'm expecting Wildturtle's performance to fall anywhere between serviceable to irrelevant.
I won't call the series either way because I'm not even rooting that hard for TSM... I want to see them win, but I also want to see Turtle fail so Doublelift comes back into the fold.
As for P1 vs. Flyquest... Flyquest is on an upswing of sorts, P1 is in freefall, but I still have to favor P1. I just can't bring myself to favor the likes of Balls, Moon and Lemon over the likes of zig, Inori/Meteos and Ryu.
On April 22 2017 08:39 Zato-1 wrote: C9 vs. TSM finals looks really close on paper. The things I'll be watching out for are:
Svenskeren: This guy's been really inconsistent- sometimes he's a beast, other times he feeds. C9 really wants to get an edge in the jungle to make up for their disadvantages in mid and toplane.
C9 Toplane: Impact on a tank sounds like C9's best bet to me. Playing Ray on a carry champion instead could pay off bigtime, but will more likely fall flat against a Hauntzer who can expect support from Bjergsen and Svenskeren.
Wildturtle: Turtle did surprisingly well vs. Flyquest in the semis, but Sneaky + Smoothie is a much scarier botlane than Altec + Lemon, and C9 is a hell of a lot tougher than Flyquest. I'm expecting Wildturtle's performance to fall anywhere between serviceable to irrelevant.
I won't call the series either way because I'm not even rooting that hard for TSM... I want to see them win, but I also want to see Turtle fail so Doublelift comes back into the fold.
As for P1 vs. Flyquest... Flyquest is on an upswing of sorts, P1 is in freefall, but I still have to favor P1. I just can't bring myself to favor the likes of Balls, Moon and Lemon over the likes of zig, Inori/Meteos and Ryu.
Should be a 3-0 in favor of TSM, playoffs TSM is a different team from regular season TSM.
Team with lulu wins. Why would flyquest give away the lulu. Every fcking play they will make the lulu will fck them over and every play p1 makes the lulu will give them the edge to make it work.
On April 23 2017 04:15 TitusVI wrote: Team with lulu wins. Why would flyquest give away the lulu. Every fcking play they will make the lulu will fck them over and every play p1 makes the lulu will give them the edge to make it work.
P1 have lulu/ivern/kog. If they manage to lose this would be pretty weird honestly. That combo is just insane.
On April 23 2017 04:27 Zato-1 wrote: Is Ivern's early game shit, or is Inori just getting outjungled really hard by Moon? 26 cs to 53 is terrible
Ivern has a kind of shitty early game CS wise. The plus side is Ivern's lesser cs numbers should include tri buffing the enemy (because of his passive) and stealing a few early game camps
On April 23 2017 04:27 Zato-1 wrote: Is Ivern's early game shit, or is Inori just getting outjungled really hard by Moon? 26 cs to 53 is terrible
Ivern doesn't CS that hard. He's often down 20-30 cs but makes up for it with being boss once item thresholds come on.
He also doesn't really need items to make himself good, his abilities tend to be item independent so he just uses those small cs numbers to get support items.
Keep in mind that Ivern has underinflated CS scores because when he clears Krugs he only get credit from the ones the spawn. So he gets 2 CS for 80 gold from it as opposed to the 10 CS for 160g.
This should be an easy 3-0 but I said that last time and CLG shit the bed so who knows anymore.
On April 23 2017 04:48 Gahlo wrote: Keep in mind that Ivern has underinflated CS scores because when he clears Krugs he only get credit from the ones the spawn. So he gets 2 CS for 80 gold from it as opposed to the 10 CS for 160g.
Forgot about that. Yea CS numbers for junglers just really don't mean much since camps are so diverse when it comes to number of units unlike lane CS being uniform. Item breakpoints and level are way easier/better ways to check.
Watching the stream muted is weirdly satisfying because you can relax and understand the game on your own. No hate against casters but I lately do this quite often.
I still don't think they are a good team though. It's just the drop off after C9/TSM is so severe that they may be the top of the pack after that. These are meant to be part of the top 4 but the level of play really doesn't feel it is.
On April 23 2017 06:41 Kyo Yuy wrote: So do people still think FlyQuest is a 10th place team?
People stopped thinking Flyquest is a 10th place team a long time ago. The fact that they're an above-average team just speaks volumes about how shallow the number of good teams in NA is because Flyquest has some pretty washed up players in Balls and Lemon (I don't think Hai is washed up though).
Yeah, I don't think Flyquest are going to do better in the summer. Nor do I think they're above average. They were able to sneak into playoffs due to cheesing teams out early in the split. A lot of teams got better as time went along and could make big strides with 1 roster change in the right direction. Who does Flyquest have that's an actual carry potential in NA outside of Hai's shotcalling?
On April 23 2017 14:39 Gahlo wrote: Yeah, I don't think Flyquest are going to do better in the summer. Nor do I think they're above average. They were able to sneak into playoffs due to cheesing teams out early in the split. A lot of teams got better as time went along and could make big strides with 1 roster change in the right direction. Who does Flyquest have that's an actual carry potential in NA outside of Hai's shotcalling?
I think a decent proxy for that is to look at Player of the Game awards.
Lemon: 1 Balls: 1 Altec: 3 Moon: 8 Hai: 9
I think Hai carried a fair number of games for Flyquest and deserves a lot of credit for how far the team made it this split. Moon is no LirA but he's one of the better players on the team as well. Altec is a legit good ADC who I place roughly at Stixxay's level, only below the likes of Sneaky and Doublelift.
But to answer the question specifically, I think Hai represents Flyquest's best carry potential. He's no Bjergsen, Jensen or Ryu, but he's a good enough player in the most important role in the game and has been the one to carry Flyquest more often than not in their wins.
I think Hai and Moon make an excellent combo that has carry potential and Altec is a very solid adc. I don't think it's terribly surprising where they ended up this split. If Flyquest can nab a top tier top laner I could see them improving quite a bit.
With that said, while I think Hai is a very good mid laner he is not quite top tier and with the mid lane being so critical, that seriously handicaps how high they can rise at the moment because Hai is also the glue that holds everything together and can't really be replaced for Flyquest.
Think we're going to see Impact fielded for the rest of the series, Ray is getting absolutely hammered. I feel bad for him, he almost outplayed Hauntzer despite being so far behind, but he failed.
26 minute inhib, ouch that's brutal.
What a one sided game, TSM played it flawlessly, and C9 couldn't keep up with the pace.
Don't even think it was really Ray's fault. He soaked up two tank attempts from Ivern and stayed even in CS. Most of the crushing came later on. Largely I think it was a failed draft and bottom lane getting pulverized due to that which allowed Biofrost and Turtle to make some important early game plays. Jensen also didn't do squat despite facing a laner starting with 10% hp. Still, C9 should have just started with Impact.
It seems like subs are usually a detriment in playoff games. I can't remember a sub making a difference in an important game. I only remember the "starters" having to come back to save the day.
On April 24 2017 05:14 lilwisper wrote: It seems like subs are usually a detriment in playoff games. I can't remember a sub making a difference in an important game. I only remember the "starters" having to come back to save the day.
Faker and Easyhoon is the classic, although it's SKT, so not really the best example. EDG made it work today, China in general is the region you see teams fielding subs often, if not always to great effect.
I really wish the TSM bias from the casters would just stop. I think about 2/3rd of their statements and opinions are about TSM in a positive light or dumping on C9 for some reason.
Sure, C9 is under-performing this series, but even when C9 had a lead in the third game, all of them were like, "C9's doing ok, but TSM is-" and I'm just sick of it, because when TSM has a lead they just fellate TSM even more and don't present ways for C9 to get back into it until they get done stroking Rege's ego.
What the hell is this TSM draft? Instead of going for the unkillable hyper-carry ADC, they go for the super unkillable tank and leave all the damage up to basically Orianna, because the moment Turtle gets caught out he's going to die.
I'd rather TSM went with Shen and then pick some hyper-carry ADC, because come mid and late game Turtle can go super ham and have a 1k+ shield on him at all times.
On April 24 2017 07:11 Kinie wrote: What the hell is this TSM draft? Instead of going for the unkillable hyper-carry ADC, they go for the super unkillable tank and leave all the damage up to basically Orianna, because the moment Turtle gets caught out he's going to die.
I'd rather TSM went with Shen and then pick some hyper-carry ADC, because come mid and late game Turtle can go super ham and have a 1k+ shield on him at all times.
Lucian works really well with lotsa shields.
Weird that lulu didn't go for the tdl AND got exh. Guess they just gonna play super passive.
On April 24 2017 07:11 chipmonklord17 wrote: Letting one team get Lulu and Ivern feels like a tremendous oversight in pick/bans but I'm curious how this draft will work
I think C9 got a very slight advantage with the Kled last pick, should let them do a pretty solid 1-3-1, they just have to not vomit up an insurmountable lead to TSM.
Rofl they gave Hauntzer MVP. Riot NA get your shit together. This is just embarassing. So the series started awful but we had 2 really hype games to end it off.
All I can say after that series is: Can we please now get Doublelift back? I don't think Bjergsen and Hauntzer's shoulders can stand the pressure of another split of carrying Wildturtle.
They lost game 4 because their comp sold out hard on protecting their ADC, but then they picked an ADC that isn't a hyper carry and it fell behind early. I was yelling at the TV "Twitch" over and over again when Cait/Kog were banned in phase 2. It was the only correct pick at that point.
On April 24 2017 19:17 Gahlo wrote: They lost game 4 because their comp sold out hard on protecting their ADC, but then they picked an ADC that isn't a hyper carry and it fell behind early. I was yelling at the TV "Twitch" over and over again when Cait/Kog were banned in phase 2. It was the only correct pick at that point.
They also got mindgamed hard by the Gragas. Thinking it was top, they decided to go with Nautilus into Gragas instead of Shen into Gragas. Instead, C9 flexed Gragas support and took Shen for themselves. If TSM knew that it was going to be Gragas support and that C9 had yet to pick their top laner, they surely would not have went for Nautilus over Shen.
Still, the "protect the Lucian" comp has been done before, and it almost worked this series. Sneaky flashing into the bush to deny vision of the last AA probably won them that game because it snowballed bot irrevocably in their favor. Imagine if that first blood goes to Lucian instead.
On April 24 2017 19:17 Gahlo wrote: They lost game 4 because their comp sold out hard on protecting their ADC, but then they picked an ADC that isn't a hyper carry and it fell behind early. I was yelling at the TV "Twitch" over and over again when Cait/Kog were banned in phase 2. It was the only correct pick at that point.
They also got mindgamed hard by the Gragas. Thinking it was top, they decided to go with Nautilus into Gragas instead of Shen into Gragas. Instead, C9 flexed Gragas support and took Shen for themselves. If TSM knew that it was going to be Gragas support and that C9 had yet to pick their top laner, they surely would not have went for Nautilus over Shen.
Still, the "protect the Lucian" comp has been done before, and it almost worked this series. Sneaky flashing into the bush to deny vision of the last AA probably won them that game because it snowballed bot irrevocably in their favor. Imagine if that first blood goes to Lucian instead.
Yeah, I've seen Lucian comps before, but I haven't seen them where the jungle position is sold out for it too - which puts even more onus on the ADC. I also mentioned the FB, albeit indirectly, by noting it fell behind.
tsm did get tricked but I don't think it was as bad.
tsm never really wanted shen anyways. shen into gragas is still a fine matchup and shen is the better champ right now. hauntzer/tsm has just not preferred the shen lately and would rather play naut in not losing matchups (ex. like grag vs naut). if they knew the shen was top they probably would have picked renekton or something. c9 knew this so they just bait out the naut and get the winning matchup in shen vs naut.
normally this wouldn't really be worth (especially if you can get the shen anyways) because you generally would rather have a better support and an even matchup top tank than a weaker lane bot with winning top tank but in this case where top was the lane c9 was generally getting snowballed on by hauntzer/sven I think it was a smart move to put some power there.
it was a good adapatation by c9 but don't think the impact (heh) was as big as it would seem and don't really blame tsm for falling for it. if we HAD to blame I would just blame them for not getting their shen better but thats a different story.
If that's really the case then that bodes very poorly for them at MSI. You can't go to an international tournament and just not play one of the most contested top laners - especially when it's a top laner with a global map pressure, because whenever champs like Shen/TF are remotely viable they're always super contested in pro play. And outside maybe Gangplank there isn't really an adequate substitute for Shen.
they play it but only twice the last 2 months and didn't seem that strong in hauntzer's hands both times. so yes that was a bit concerning given the strength of shen in the recent patch. however I'm not as worried because I know hauntzer was able to play shen (he did before) so I'm not sure if tsm were just like meh we played only 2 shen games in the last 2 months and it sucked so lets just not focus on it. which isn't the greatest but I doubt its hauntzer saying that he can't play it or saying he doesn't want to.
also the shen nerfs were quite large for the 7.8 patch (which MSI will be played on) so I highly doubt shen will be a priority pick anymore for the time being. so this will probably be a non-issue there.
On April 25 2017 13:14 Gahlo wrote: Hauntzer played Shen 6 times this split with a 4-2 record. The wins coming against Dig, C9, NV, and P1 while the losses were IMT and EF.
yes we know he played it in the past without much problems which is why it's strange
also for context 66% on a champ is his 2nd lowest. the lowest being his 0% 0-1 gangplank. so it's not really unreasonable to assume TSM and/or hauntzer just didn't want to use shen last patch. they never really seemed to want to shen last patch even when open when most other teams would take it.