2015 Worlds Group Stage Day 1-4 Results - Page 121
Forum Index > LoL Tournaments |
![]()
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
| ||
Yorbon
Netherlands4272 Posts
On October 03 2015 01:48 Plexa wrote: I didn't see the draft ):What would you have picked, given you're not willing to FP elise? But if they had the chance to pick elise, that's a no brainer. | ||
F1rstAssau1t
1341 Posts
YUROP!! | ||
![]()
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On October 03 2015 01:49 Yorbon wrote: I didn't see the draft ): But if they had the chance to pick elise, that's a no brainer. Bans: Varus, GP, Darius (LGD), Morde, Lee Sin, Rek'Sai (Origen) LGD first picks lulu, fair enough imo. OG picks elise/kalista. | ||
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
On October 03 2015 01:49 TheYango wrote: Also, GodV has an annoyingly high tendency to do stupid shit later on in the game, which can't really be blamed on TBQ. His big plays are good and are what make him popular, but the tendency to randomly do stupid shit actually is a bigger deal in a practical sense. But in fact, who would you replace him with? | ||
Kavas
Australia3421 Posts
On October 03 2015 01:46 wei2coolman wrote: I mean, this is with considering he has TBQ as a jungler. Meanwhile every other worldclass midlaner has a non-brain dead jungler. Faker when rest of SKT was slumping. For people that like to bring that TBQ is a shit jungler that drags GodV down, you need to remember he has Imp and Pyl (and occasionally Acorn/Flame) to carry both their asses. | ||
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
Not a hate post, but I think China needs to get rid of all their Chinese players to far. | ||
![]()
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On October 03 2015 01:39 Azarkon wrote: But actually, Pyl and GodV are considered two of the best players in China. The team only has one weakness; in the past that was enough to win as the other roles were able to out perform Western teams, but this year it looks as though native European players are at the same level/higher than Chinese/Korean players. I mean, China's best Worlds performance was by a team that was weaker individually on 3/5 positions than their Western opponent. Individual skill basically played next to zero part in that team's ability to go as far as it did. | ||
MuddyJam
535 Posts
On October 03 2015 01:52 Plexa wrote: Bans: Varus, GP, Darius (LGD), Morde, Lee Sin, Rek'Sai (Origen) LGD first picks lulu, fair enough imo. OG picks elise/kalista. Varus ban is silly. I doubt xpeke would of even played it | ||
Zato-1
Chile4253 Posts
On October 03 2015 01:48 1oo wrote: Niels is so underrated, always plays so well. GG so happy for Origen, always believed they could do it. Agreed, Niels is a beast | ||
![]()
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On October 03 2015 01:53 MuddyJam wrote: Varus ban is silly. I doubt xpeke would of even played it Yeah that ban is *really* weird. | ||
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
| ||
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
![]()
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On October 03 2015 01:53 TheYango wrote: I mean, China's best Worlds performance was by a team that was weaker individually on 3/5 positions than their Western opponent. Individual skill basically played next to zero part in that team's ability to go as far as it did. RIP Tabe, you were too good for China | ||
MaestroSC
United States2073 Posts
Veigar or Azir..both bring control to help protect the Kogmaw, and add a bit of separation. I still dont think the malphite was a good pick. IMO Tops are bit weak atm, and there are several VERY strong mids and I dont think its worth giving up the damage of the strong mid champs, for a supportive mid like Lulu. The only time i like Lulu mid is if you are going to focus on having a strong top that NEEDS the utility spells from Lulu. IMO she isnt worth it as a mid, just doesnt do enough damage IMO to make it worth putting her in the position usually responsible for 40+% of the damage. Also, I think Origen should have used Alistar instead of Annie.. Kalista Alistar IMO would have had the same utility as annie stun, and would have brought some more tankiness to OG...who were against a single damage comp..the tankier you are the more and more pressure on the other teams 1 source of damage. IDK I feel Alistar is better in every way while you have a Kalista..so if they arent picking Alistar with a Kalista i feel like they just dont like the champion, which imo is a point of concern for them. | ||
Yorbon
Netherlands4272 Posts
On October 03 2015 01:52 Plexa wrote: Hm, with these bans you're in a bind at blue side either way i guess. The varus ban puzzles me a bit. Is it to avoid his poke (given that you're going for juggermaw that is)?Bans: Varus, GP, Darius (LGD), Morde, Lee Sin, Rek'Sai (Origen) LGD first picks lulu, fair enough imo. OG picks elise/kalista. | ||
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
Can SKT T1 beat it?! | ||
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On October 03 2015 01:55 MaestroSC wrote: Personally.. I would have had lulu top, and gotten a different mid. Any of the in-meta mid champs would have been good. Veigar or Azir..both bring control to help protect the Kogmaw, and add a bit of separation. I still dont think the malphite was a good pick. IMO Tops are bit weak atm, and there are several VERY strong mids and I dont think its worth giving up the damage of the strong mid champs, for a supportive mid like Lulu. The only time i like Lulu mid is if you are going to focus on having a strong top that NEEDS the utility spells from Lulu. IMO she isnt worth it as a mid, just doesnt do enough damage IMO to make it worth putting her in the position usually responsible for 40+% of the damage. i agree. thought they had to draft something else given the bad matchup mid. but they were a bit too arrogant and wanted to facerush OG down. | ||
![]()
Inflicted
Australia18228 Posts
| ||
| ||