|
|
On September 21 2013 14:06 Chrispy wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2013 14:05 Volband wrote:On September 21 2013 14:04 petered wrote:
I do agree with the casters, wildturtle definitely impressed that game. If regi finally retires I'll probably start cheering for TSM. If WingsofDeath gets to play instead of Dyrus, and they get a midlaner, like mancloud or sth, me too. WingsofDeath superior to Dyrus... ha.
Truth hurts, but that's just it. He can also play mid if needed for some tricky strats.
|
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On September 21 2013 14:06 Fionn wrote:
Only way TSM gets a playoff tiebreak is if OMG loses their next three games (TSM, SKT, GG.Eu) and they win their last three (OMG, LD, GG.Eu).
OMG will never lose to GG.eu. My 1 week of LoL has taught me that much.
|
On September 21 2013 14:06 Volband wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2013 14:05 .maLice. wrote:On September 21 2013 14:04 NeoIllusions wrote:On September 21 2013 14:04 .maLice. wrote:On September 21 2013 14:02 Numy wrote:On September 21 2013 14:01 .maLice. wrote:On September 21 2013 14:00 Chexx wrote:
still believe that the requiem double kill in bot was pure luck and the siegeing t3 tower while t2 is still up was being fooling around. That's because you're biased as fuck. Lol ok unbiased man did Dyrus plan to die as SKT engaged bottom while Sona fails? Not at all. That's simply what you would generally do as a dead Karthus.. Your question doesnt even make sense. Who the fuck plans on dying? ... you realize Dyrus was Karthus? Yes. That's what I just said. Dyrus died and pressed R. And got lucky, because his requiem was actually useful bottom lane, but that was totally unintentional. No skill involved.
Is there a way to ignore people on TL? This guy's posts are hurting my brain.
|
Australia18228 Posts
If SKT loses to OMG, don't they secure their quarterfinals spot?
|
On September 21 2013 14:05 .maLice. wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2013 14:04 NeoIllusions wrote:On September 21 2013 14:04 .maLice. wrote:On September 21 2013 14:02 Numy wrote:On September 21 2013 14:01 .maLice. wrote:On September 21 2013 14:00 Chexx wrote:
still believe that the requiem double kill in bot was pure luck and the siegeing t3 tower while t2 is still up was being fooling around. That's because you're biased as fuck. Lol ok unbiased man did Dyrus plan to die as SKT engaged bottom while Sona fails? Not at all. That's simply what you would generally do as a dead Karthus.. Your question doesnt even make sense. Who the fuck plans on dying? ... you realize Dyrus was Karthus? Yes. That's what I just said. Dyrus died and pressed R.
Yes but it was unintentional that it timed up with the fight bottom. He was ulting for the Jax top but SKT just happened to engage bottom at the same time as he died.
|
On September 21 2013 14:07 stuchiu wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2013 14:06 Fionn wrote:
Only way TSM gets a playoff tiebreak is if OMG loses their next three games (TSM, SKT, GG.Eu) and they win their last three (OMG, LD, GG.Eu). OMG will never lose to GG.eu. My 1 week of LoL has taught me that much.
1 week? you're practically an expert, I look forward to your writing contributions in this forum.
|
On September 21 2013 14:06 Numy wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2013 14:04 .maLice. wrote:On September 21 2013 14:02 Numy wrote:On September 21 2013 14:01 .maLice. wrote:On September 21 2013 14:00 Chexx wrote:
still believe that the requiem double kill in bot was pure luck and the siegeing t3 tower while t2 is still up was being fooling around. That's because you're biased as fuck. Lol ok unbiased man did Dyrus plan to die as SKT engaged bottom while Sona fails? Not at all. That's simply what you would generally do as a dead Karthus.. Your question doesnt even make sense. Who the fuck plans on dying? You are saying the double kill wasn't luck. Which means that TSM had planned to force SKT to engage on them and Dyrus to ulti at the same time. What happened was Dyrus got ganked then SKT engaged. So dyrus was dead at the time thus nets a double kill. How exactly was that planned from Dyrus? So why are you calling him biased as fuck?
No man, I'm saying that it WAS simply luck on Dyrus' part. He simply pressed R on Karthus during passive, as you would normally do. This allowed bot lane to engage, and then the missed crescendo, and so forth.
|
On September 21 2013 14:07 stuchiu wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2013 14:06 Fionn wrote:
Only way TSM gets a playoff tiebreak is if OMG loses their next three games (TSM, SKT, GG.Eu) and they win their last three (OMG, LD, GG.Eu). OMG will never lose to GG.eu. My 1 week of LoL has taught me that much.
OMG already gbeat GG.Eu
|
so if OMG beats TSM does that mathematically end this group?
|
On September 21 2013 14:07 Gahlo wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2013 14:06 Volband wrote:On September 21 2013 14:05 .maLice. wrote:On September 21 2013 14:04 NeoIllusions wrote:On September 21 2013 14:04 .maLice. wrote:On September 21 2013 14:02 Numy wrote:On September 21 2013 14:01 .maLice. wrote:On September 21 2013 14:00 Chexx wrote:
still believe that the requiem double kill in bot was pure luck and the siegeing t3 tower while t2 is still up was being fooling around. That's because you're biased as fuck. Lol ok unbiased man did Dyrus plan to die as SKT engaged bottom while Sona fails? Not at all. That's simply what you would generally do as a dead Karthus.. Your question doesnt even make sense. Who the fuck plans on dying? ... you realize Dyrus was Karthus? Yes. That's what I just said. Dyrus died and pressed R. And got lucky, because his requiem was actually useful bottom lane, but that was totally unintentional. No skill involved. Is there a way to ignore people on TL? This guy's posts are hurting my brain.
Why don't u go to the solomid forums, to your baylifers?:D (TL+ btw)
|
Korea (South)11232 Posts
On September 21 2013 14:08 .maLice. wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2013 14:06 Numy wrote:On September 21 2013 14:04 .maLice. wrote:On September 21 2013 14:02 Numy wrote:On September 21 2013 14:01 .maLice. wrote:On September 21 2013 14:00 Chexx wrote:
still believe that the requiem double kill in bot was pure luck and the siegeing t3 tower while t2 is still up was being fooling around. That's because you're biased as fuck. Lol ok unbiased man did Dyrus plan to die as SKT engaged bottom while Sona fails? Not at all. That's simply what you would generally do as a dead Karthus.. Your question doesnt even make sense. Who the fuck plans on dying? You are saying the double kill wasn't luck. Which means that TSM had planned to force SKT to engage on them and Dyrus to ulti at the same time. What happened was Dyrus got ganked then SKT engaged. So dyrus was dead at the time thus nets a double kill. How exactly was that planned from Dyrus? So why are you calling him biased as fuck? No man, I'm saying that it WAS simply luck on Dyrus' part. He simply pressed R on Karthus during passive, as you would normally do. This allowed bot lane to engage, and then the missed crescendo, and so forth.
so we are agreeing?
iirc SKT T1 botlane engaged before Dyrus died
|
On September 21 2013 14:08 Dodgin wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2013 14:07 stuchiu wrote:On September 21 2013 14:06 Fionn wrote:
Only way TSM gets a playoff tiebreak is if OMG loses their next three games (TSM, SKT, GG.Eu) and they win their last three (OMG, LD, GG.Eu). OMG will never lose to GG.eu. My 1 week of LoL has taught me that much. 1 week? you're practically an expert, I look forward to your writing contributions in this forum.
Kick that wonderscrub off and put in this guy.
|
On September 21 2013 14:08 Slusher wrote:
so if OMG beats TSM does that mathematically end this group?
Yeah, not sure how it will end up if SKT wins next game vs OMG though, tiebreaker?
|
On September 21 2013 14:08 Slusher wrote:
so if OMG beats TSM does that mathematically end this group?
Yes.
EDIT: In other news, still think TOO is one of the least impactful junglers on Elise I've ever seen. His massive champion pool of 2, you'd only think he'd be better at the two he plays.
|
On September 21 2013 14:08 Slusher wrote:
so if OMG beats TSM does that mathematically end this group?
yes
|
United States23455 Posts
On September 21 2013 14:08 Slusher wrote:
so if OMG beats TSM does that mathematically end this group?
The group is over if OMG beat GG.eu, so you can pretty much say it's over. If TSM do lose to OMG, though, they are out before tomorrow's games.
If they somehow beat OMG, then they need GG.eu to beat OMG.
|
On September 21 2013 14:08 .maLice. wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2013 14:06 Numy wrote:On September 21 2013 14:04 .maLice. wrote:On September 21 2013 14:02 Numy wrote:On September 21 2013 14:01 .maLice. wrote:On September 21 2013 14:00 Chexx wrote:
still believe that the requiem double kill in bot was pure luck and the siegeing t3 tower while t2 is still up was being fooling around. That's because you're biased as fuck. Lol ok unbiased man did Dyrus plan to die as SKT engaged bottom while Sona fails? Not at all. That's simply what you would generally do as a dead Karthus.. Your question doesnt even make sense. Who the fuck plans on dying? You are saying the double kill wasn't luck. Which means that TSM had planned to force SKT to engage on them and Dyrus to ulti at the same time. What happened was Dyrus got ganked then SKT engaged. So dyrus was dead at the time thus nets a double kill. How exactly was that planned from Dyrus? So why are you calling him biased as fuck? No man, I'm saying that it WAS simply luck on Dyrus' part. He simply pressed R on Karthus during passive, as you would normally do. This allowed bot lane to engage, and then the missed crescendo, and so forth.
Then why are you calling someone "biased as fuck" when they said it was luck.
|
United States7639 Posts
On September 21 2013 14:08 .maLice. wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2013 14:06 Numy wrote:On September 21 2013 14:04 .maLice. wrote:On September 21 2013 14:02 Numy wrote:On September 21 2013 14:01 .maLice. wrote:On September 21 2013 14:00 Chexx wrote:
still believe that the requiem double kill in bot was pure luck and the siegeing t3 tower while t2 is still up was being fooling around. That's because you're biased as fuck. Lol ok unbiased man did Dyrus plan to die as SKT engaged bottom while Sona fails? Not at all. That's simply what you would generally do as a dead Karthus.. Your question doesnt even make sense. Who the fuck plans on dying? You are saying the double kill wasn't luck. Which means that TSM had planned to force SKT to engage on them and Dyrus to ulti at the same time. What happened was Dyrus got ganked then SKT engaged. So dyrus was dead at the time thus nets a double kill. How exactly was that planned from Dyrus? So why are you calling him biased as fuck? No man, I'm saying that it WAS simply luck on Dyrus' part. He simply pressed R on Karthus during passive, as you would normally do. This allowed bot lane to engage, and then the missed crescendo, and so forth.
So you're saying the exact same thing as Chexx, but for some reason, it makes him biased. Ooookay.
|
On September 21 2013 14:09 Chexx wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2013 14:08 .maLice. wrote:On September 21 2013 14:06 Numy wrote:On September 21 2013 14:04 .maLice. wrote:On September 21 2013 14:02 Numy wrote:On September 21 2013 14:01 .maLice. wrote:On September 21 2013 14:00 Chexx wrote:
still believe that the requiem double kill in bot was pure luck and the siegeing t3 tower while t2 is still up was being fooling around. That's because you're biased as fuck. Lol ok unbiased man did Dyrus plan to die as SKT engaged bottom while Sona fails? Not at all. That's simply what you would generally do as a dead Karthus.. Your question doesnt even make sense. Who the fuck plans on dying? You are saying the double kill wasn't luck. Which means that TSM had planned to force SKT to engage on them and Dyrus to ulti at the same time. What happened was Dyrus got ganked then SKT engaged. So dyrus was dead at the time thus nets a double kill. How exactly was that planned from Dyrus? So why are you calling him biased as fuck? No man, I'm saying that it WAS simply luck on Dyrus' part. He simply pressed R on Karthus during passive, as you would normally do. This allowed bot lane to engage, and then the missed crescendo, and so forth. so we are agreeing?
Yeah, apparently :D
|
Korea (South)11232 Posts
On September 21 2013 14:10 .maLice. wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2013 14:09 Chexx wrote:On September 21 2013 14:08 .maLice. wrote:On September 21 2013 14:06 Numy wrote:On September 21 2013 14:04 .maLice. wrote:On September 21 2013 14:02 Numy wrote:On September 21 2013 14:01 .maLice. wrote:On September 21 2013 14:00 Chexx wrote:
still believe that the requiem double kill in bot was pure luck and the siegeing t3 tower while t2 is still up was being fooling around. That's because you're biased as fuck. Lol ok unbiased man did Dyrus plan to die as SKT engaged bottom while Sona fails? Not at all. That's simply what you would generally do as a dead Karthus.. Your question doesnt even make sense. Who the fuck plans on dying? You are saying the double kill wasn't luck. Which means that TSM had planned to force SKT to engage on them and Dyrus to ulti at the same time. What happened was Dyrus got ganked then SKT engaged. So dyrus was dead at the time thus nets a double kill. How exactly was that planned from Dyrus? So why are you calling him biased as fuck? No man, I'm saying that it WAS simply luck on Dyrus' part. He simply pressed R on Karthus during passive, as you would normally do. This allowed bot lane to engage, and then the missed crescendo, and so forth. so we are agreeing? Yeah, apparently :D
then why I am biased? :<
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
