EPT[IEM] Season 6 Championship - Page 119
| Forum Index > LoL Tournaments |
At any point of IEM Season 6 Championship, if you think of an interesting byline, please drop a sentence in the Pro Scene thread. At the end of the month, I'll catalogue the results of Hannover but also any interesting facts or events that happen over the course of the tournament. Thanks. Neo, 06.03.2012 | ||
JBright
Vancouver14381 Posts
| ||
|
Woony
Germany6657 Posts
On March 07 2012 23:31 daemir wrote: Which is why pro players need training for it. Whether they like it or not, PR is important. Hell they should know, they live by streams and websites...publicity is everything. I just think it's pretty stupid to force the looser to do an interview. I mean even in something as professional as soccer, the coach of the loosing team will often refuse to do interviews or is just pissed as hell. | ||
|
triangle
United States3803 Posts
On March 07 2012 23:32 Dakmaniac wrote: TSM out  No, if they beat SK and M5 does as well then they can still advance. | ||
|
romanov
Netherlands892 Posts
On March 07 2012 23:32 Dakmaniac wrote: TSM out Some guy in chat just said they can still advance if SK loses twice | ||
|
Shanba
Scotland144 Posts
On March 07 2012 23:32 daemir wrote: Dunno why kog was playing the explorer, but then again lyumi (spelling?) played an atrociously bad vayne too. What happened to lounet playing AD for sypher? His urgot was pretty strong. | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
| ||
|
daemir
Finland8662 Posts
| ||
|
Dakmaniac
212 Posts
On March 07 2012 23:33 triangle wrote: No, if they beat SK and M5 does as well then they can still advance. ah silly me you are right ofc  thx | ||
|
pokerface
507 Posts
On March 07 2012 23:33 triangle wrote: No, if they beat SK and M5 does as well then they can still advance. Isnt it like this: TSM beats SK and IF SK beats M5 then! they have a chance to advance? | ||
|
Woony
Germany6657 Posts
On March 07 2012 23:33 Shikyo wrote: This tournament has motivated me to start commentating league of legends :3 Look forward to some vods soon~ It blows my mind how CLG.eu is at this event and not competing and yet they haven't had anyone guest cast. I mean Phreak/Rivington/Zenon are very decent casters but you just really need somebody that knows what's going on. | ||
|
dooraven
Australia2820 Posts
| ||
|
krews
United States1308 Posts
On March 07 2012 23:34 pokerface wrote: Isnt it like this: TSM beats SK and IF SK beats M5 then! they have a chance to advance? Its either SK has to lose to M5 and TSM or TSM has to beat SK and Curse lose to Ehome | ||
|
Chiharu Harukaze
12112 Posts
So TSM needs to beat SK, and M5 need to beat SK for TSM to have a chance for advancing. If SK beat M5, even if TSM beat SK, they can't advance as Curse will advance over TSM due to head-to-head. | ||
|
triangle
United States3803 Posts
On March 07 2012 23:34 pokerface wrote: Isnt it like this: TSM beats SK and IF SK beats M5 then! they have a chance to advance? No. TSM beats SK, SK beats M5 Crs, SK, M5 advance. Because M5 is then 4-1 or 3-2 and beats TSM on tiebreaks, and SK is 4-1, and Crs is 3-2 and beats TSM on tiebreaks. TSM needs M5 to win. TSM beats SK, M5 beats SK M5 1st seed, TSM, Crs, SK all tied. Determined by time. | ||
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
| ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On March 07 2012 23:34 Woony wrote: It blows my mind how CLG.eu is at this event and not competing and yet they haven't had anyone guest cast. I mean Phreak/Rivington/Zenon are very decent casters but you just really need somebody that knows what's going on. Yep and that doesn't talk in a monotone boring voice or screech like a madman, I notice that there's a huge void to be filled ;D Phreak/Rivington/Zenon are indeed the only ones I find bearable, funnily enough Phreak is my favorite simply because he speaks decent English and doesn't sound like a Zombie Karthus after a night at a club. | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands21944 Posts
SK and M5 are basicly through but if TSM can beat sypher they are threw or draw depending on if Curse beat Sypher and then its about time? | ||
|
daemir
Finland8662 Posts
On March 07 2012 23:36 NeoIllusions wrote: Granted that SK played EH and Sypher early in the groups, how have they been performing? I haven't seen a single one of their games yet. Team look ok or is it just Oce putting 4 guys on his back (which is what I typically feel like how SK wins games)? They looked strong so far, but all it takes is to get oce off his play and it's down the sink for them. | ||
|
little fancy
Germany2504 Posts
On March 07 2012 23:29 Chiharu Harukaze wrote: It's been talked about in the SC2 Forums a bit. A lot of progamers haven't had PR training. You think of some of the best SC2 interviews. Liquid. EG. They've all had PR training. A lot of LoL progamers haven't had that. Maybe Dignitas? I don't expect professional behaviour, I just want the interviewed persons to show some respect to the guy that inverwies them and not to pretend to be something / act like someone uber fresh wannabe. I for myself can't take people showing such a behaviour seriously. On March 07 2012 23:29 Woony wrote: You have to keep in mind that a) english is not everyone's first language and not everyone is comfortable giving them and b) no one wants to give interviews after loosing a game it's just depressing as hell. Still the EHOME player was polite after the loss and you could understand him. Or look at the interview from MoMa yesterday. He wasn't that firm with english, too, and you could clearly hear the typical german accent, but he was polite, gave reasonable answers and presented himself in a way so you can take him seriously. | ||
|
Shanba
Scotland144 Posts
On March 07 2012 23:35 dooraven wrote: Woooooooot Sypher is out, I'm happy because this just adds to the proof that Lyumi is terrible and hopefully sypher gets some sense and kicks him out. Pyri + Lounet was so much stronger. Can't sypher still advance if crs somehow loses to ehome, tsm loses to sk and they beat m5? Granted very very unlikely, but that would put all three teams at a 2-3 tie in third place and it would go back to the timebreaker rule. | ||
| ||
