• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 22:32
CEST 04:32
KST 11:32
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10
Community News
Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.161Rollback Netcode in Brood War845.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 202623Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)0SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup10
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 2026 Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.16 StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon ESL Pro Tour for SC2 discontinued [Old] StarCraft 3 Reportedly in Development
Tourneys
$3,500 WardiTV Not-Summer Championship Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier RSL 2026 Offline Finals LCQ Sign-Ups ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts
Brood War
General
New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery! BW General Discussion ASL FINALS HYPE VIDEO 2X ASL22 General Discussion BSL23 Confirmations Starts on New BSL Portal
Tourneys
ASL 22 Finals [ASL22] Semifinal B [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Semifinal A
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do?
Other Games
General Games
Dawn of War IV Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Link Between Gaming and …
TrAiDoS
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 11208 users

LotV Community Feedback Update - October 22 - Page 2

Forum Index > Legacy of the Void
170 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 Next All
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany16102 Posts
October 22 2015 18:35 GMT
#21
As we often point out, it’s not as helpful for us when you give extreme feedback such as “this will never work no matter what, and it has to be completely removed from the game.” I’m sure many of you out there have seen plenty of times throughout this beta process that issues are rarely this extreme.

When you completely disagree with it from a design perspective it IS helpful; unless you don't care if the players think the game is badly designed.
Being able to instantly siege anywhere on the map removes all the positional aspects of tank play (mostly in tvt because you can't afford that many medivacs outside of marine tank play)
Disliking this is completely legit and has nothing to do with "to extreme feedback".
You may be able to balance this well but I know that I will always hate flying siege tanks.
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
Thezzy
Profile Joined October 2010
Netherlands2117 Posts
October 22 2015 18:38 GMT
#22
Why not just up the Nydus Worm health to something beyond what workers can easily kill off?
With an invincible Nydus Worm I'm surprised Zergs haven't used it yet to block off ramps or something akin to a Force Field.
Just up the health enough so that 2-3 workers can't just run up to it and kill it.
Playing Terran is like flying down a MULE drop in a marine suit, firing a Gauss Rifle
PinoKotsBeer
Profile Joined February 2014
Netherlands1387 Posts
October 22 2015 18:39 GMT
#23
Ultras and parasitic bomb change?... nope, another week of the same shit.
http://www.twitch.tv/pinokotsbeer
Kvothe1139
Profile Joined February 2015
United States17 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-10-22 18:39:40
October 22 2015 18:39 GMT
#24
A lot of people dont think the adept is in a good position right now which is why they are taking away one of their two nerfs to the adepts
What is dead may never die
zizerg
Profile Joined March 2010
Kyrgyzstan16 Posts
October 22 2015 18:44 GMT
#25
I like invulnerable nydus because it foreces an opponent to build army. If i c that my opponent just sitting behind the wall with no army I make nydus and get easy win. I agree that current state is too OP and it will be good to make delay before units come out from nydus. But I think delay must be as short as not to let workers to kill nydus. Opponent must have an army to kill it. So another option to fix nydus is to give armor and remove invulnerability, so workers can't still kill worm but any big army can.
HomeWorld
Profile Joined December 2011
Romania903 Posts
October 22 2015 18:45 GMT
#26
Well, when Dustin Browder was in charge at least they were more preoccupied with buffing and nerfing the rocks instead of introducing, rage inducing, nonsense making, buffs/nerfs
I don't know what to say, the whole thing since beta start looks like a futile attempt to fine cut a diamond with a sledgehammer ... and there are less than 3 weeks remaining till release.
Also, still no mention of parasitic bomb ...
Shinba
Profile Joined October 2015
25 Posts
October 22 2015 18:49 GMT
#27
The Lurker nerf is bad, it kills ZvZ and it makes ZvP a back to mass stalkers
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
October 22 2015 18:52 GMT
#28
Is the lurker thing about the "general timing" of lurker ZvP play, or has there popped up a "timing attack" I'm not aware of?
Because in the first case I greatly disagree with lengthening the lurker den build time even more. But I guess everything fun for zerg should go to T3ish tech, so that then they wonder when it's always mass roach and "stale metagame" complaints for years.
IceBerrY
Profile Joined February 2012
Germany220 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-10-22 18:55:58
October 22 2015 18:55 GMT
#29
On October 23 2015 03:38 Thezzy wrote:
Why not just up the Nydus Worm health to something beyond what workers can easily kill off?
With an invincible Nydus Worm I'm surprised Zergs haven't used it yet to block off ramps or something akin to a Force Field.
Just up the health enough so that 2-3 workers can't just run up to it and kill it.


This. Just give it some amor or/ and health. There is no counterplay until the nydus is up, thats just plain stupid.
Yes you can move your units into position and be ready, but its just so much effort for the defender and no pressure what so ever for the aggressor, -which is weird. Ofcourse it would be great that nydus has its rightfull place in the arsenal of zerg,
but that way it just feels to be "cheap" (,that beeing said as a zerg if that matters). Whatever, we don´t have anything to say anyway.
Shinba
Profile Joined October 2015
25 Posts
October 22 2015 18:55 GMT
#30
On October 23 2015 03:52 Big J wrote:
Is the lurker thing about the "general timing" of lurker ZvP play, or has there popped up a "timing attack" I'm not aware of?
Because in the first case I greatly disagree with lengthening the lurker den build time even more. But I guess everything fun for zerg should go to T3ish tech, so that then they wonder when it's always mass roach and "stale metagame" complaints for years.


There are rush lurkers builds but optimal builds are not out yet so they look OP

But in a macro game its terrible

Lurkers are hard to get and used, back to Roach vs Roach and blink stalkers being used in mass

If anything they could have helped Disruptors come out faster and lower their damage.

5 Disruptors hard counters Lurkers very hard
RaFox17
Profile Joined May 2013
Finland4581 Posts
October 22 2015 18:56 GMT
#31
On October 23 2015 03:52 Big J wrote:
Is the lurker thing about the "general timing" of lurker ZvP play, or has there popped up a "timing attack" I'm not aware of?
Because in the first case I greatly disagree with lengthening the lurker den build time even more. But I guess everything fun for zerg should go to T3ish tech, so that then they wonder when it's always mass roach and "stale metagame" complaints for years.

I fear this could lead right back to hots style full blink bs.
Cricketer12
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
United States14003 Posts
October 22 2015 18:58 GMT
#32
On October 23 2015 03:45 HomeWorld wrote:
Well, when Dustin Browder was in charge at least they were more preoccupied with buffing and nerfing the rocks instead of introducing, rage inducing, nonsense making, buffs/nerfs
I don't know what to say, the whole thing since beta start looks like a futile attempt to fine cut a diamond with a sledgehammer ... and there are less than 3 weeks remaining till release.
Also, still no mention of parasitic bomb ...

Rocks > Community Update
Engage, Zero target Engage, Engage, Kagari target Engage, Engage.
404AlphaSquad
Profile Joined October 2011
839 Posts
October 22 2015 18:59 GMT
#33
Making new extra rules, just makes the game overly complicated. I miss clean design from BW and WOL. Even HOTS has cleaner design:

I can already see the next patch:
+ Show Spoiler +
Snipe adjusted: snipe does a^2 + b^2 amount of dmg where a is the distance *2+4 and b is the unit type value: armored 10 light 5 anything else 3.75939. This applies to everything except for psionic units where a the equation e^{i x} = \cos x + i \sin x is used instead
aka Kalevi
TheGoldenKim
Profile Joined October 2015
1 Post
October 22 2015 19:06 GMT
#34
I agree a lot with the update and changes. As a terran player, I am completely fine with the liberator change. It still is relative to use and powerful even with the range nerf because it can be attained in the late game.

Personally, I don't think the seige tank drop is necessary to have because it really messed up the game in TvT. I don't like to play it. However, it does help to save siege tanks from good micro. But I just wish there was a better way.

Also, I think the photon overcharge should be changed to more energy, so that it won't be spammed so much especially in the early game not so much in the late game. Protoss should have some sort of defense for their expansions, but not something that completely gives them an easy way to do it without a way to punish them.

The nydus worm being untargetable until it pops can be a little op because that fact that even when you see and are prepared to kill it, the queens are able to heal it up and pretty much means GG for the terran especially. I suggest just to make it a longer time somehow to develop the nydus worm.

Additionally, the only thing I was wanting to hear was the parasitic bomb. I truly believe that this is overpowered in the fact that it can stack meaning if you don't have the skill and micro to split your air units fast enough then all the air units die almost instantly. I hope Blizzard could give a huge green mark on the air unit that has the parasitic bomb activated on just like the ravens seeker missile that radiates red on the unit being targeted on. This would at least help distinguish when one to split easier because it is already hard itself.

Honestly, though thank you for the good updates. Good work.
TimeSpiral
Profile Joined January 2011
United States1010 Posts
October 22 2015 19:07 GMT
#35
Holy fuck this is going to be a gigantic nerf to Liberators, lol! Damn ... They needed a nerf, but in the context of a nerf to Carriers and Vipers. They specifically mentioned the Carrier's problem ability--release interceptors--so lets see if they address it in the update.

No mention of parasitic bomb ... Seems if Liberator and Carrier are getting nerfed they should also tone back Zerg's incredibly good air army.
[G] Positioning, Formations, and Tactics: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=187892
RaFox17
Profile Joined May 2013
Finland4581 Posts
October 22 2015 19:09 GMT
#36
On October 23 2015 04:07 TimeSpiral wrote:
Holy fuck this is going to be a gigantic nerf to Liberators, lol! Damn ... They needed a nerf, but in the context of a nerf to Carriers and Vipers. They specifically mentioned the Carrier's problem ability--release interceptors--so lets see if they address it in the update.

No mention of parasitic bomb ... Seems if Liberator and Carrier are getting nerfed they should also tone back Zerg's incredibly good air army.

Seems like they have created a huge problem with every air unit being near broken to combat the other near broken air units...
avilo
Profile Blog Joined November 2007
United States4100 Posts
October 22 2015 19:22 GMT
#37
Surprisingly, those all seem to be decent possible changes...the liberator one in particular i've seen people suggest on forums and that seems like a really good idea.

Uh, nydus worms....yeah...uh yeah just because people aren't abusing the fact they can get a freewin yet...doesn't mean they won't when tourneys start and people get freewins with it. Dunno how a 1 sec delay or 2 sec delay will stop queens from transfusing this thing into infinity. Me personally, i like the HOTS version because it has definitive counter-play - you see it, you can kill it. Just as it should be. Not this horse shit of "i need X amount of units here or this thing is going to fuck me."

Carriers, yep they're OP. Nerf.

Adepts...buff? No thank you...not looking forward to more of this non-sense. I still think adepts are too strong right now in the current patch with their perma stim. They basically replace zealots 100%.

WHY NO MENTION OF PARASITIC BULLSHIT BOMB. SERIOUSLY? What is their attachment to this bullshit ability being in the game? It's stackable, instant cast like the old INSTA AMAZING FUNGAL, and has absolutely no counter play in late game once there's 6+ vipers.

Please just remove parasitic bomb. I know they don't wnat "extreme feedback" but this is feedback from experience accumulated across the entire beta. Parasitic bomb is one of the most bullshit abilities i have ever seen in SC2, rivalling the archon toilet/insta fungal of old. Remove that shit.
Sup
Cluster__
Profile Joined September 2013
United States328 Posts
October 22 2015 19:29 GMT
#38
Surprised they feel the need to buff adepts.. already such a strong unit
Liquid`Snute, AcerScarlett, ROOTCatZ, MC, Maru, Soulkey, Losira
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20344 Posts
October 22 2015 19:30 GMT
#39
Carrier
We agree with your feedback in that even after the build time reduction, Carriers with the Release Interceptor ability are most likely too strong for cost in head-on engagements. We’ve been trying various changes, and we wonder if just a straight up Carrier health nerf is a decent way to go.


Kidding? That's insane. It needed a power nerf in the first place - why are we fucking around with the build time?

That was never the problem. Now we'll have a ridiculous long build time forever.
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
Shinba
Profile Joined October 2015
25 Posts
October 22 2015 19:30 GMT
#40
The changes are good except the lurker nerf, its pretty bad.

Prev 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PiGosaur Cup
09:30
#103
PiGStarcraft629
CranKy Ducklings86
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft629
Reynor 220
ProTech160
RuFF_SC2 157
ViBE143
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 2864
GuemChi 1560
NaDa 43
Dota 2
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
taco 421
Other Games
summit1g8082
JimRising 526
C9.Mang0357
WinterStarcraft168
Livibee166
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1026
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• EnkiAlexander 60
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP56
• davetesta13
• Letter1410
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Scarra1392
Upcoming Events
Kung Fu Cup
8h 28m
The PondCast
1d 7h
Online Event
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Rush vs Soulkey
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
BSL Open Qualifier
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
IPSL
4 days
BSL Open Qualifier
4 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
6 days
PiGosaur Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-10-13
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Copium Cup

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Acropolis #5
HCC Season 3
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.